Why I Hate Twilight

95 reasons why you shouldn’t read Twilight, one of the worst pieces of literature ever written.

  1. Bella is a perfect character (“Mary Sue”), which Meyer hides by calling her clumsy.
  2. Being clumsy is not a flaw if Edward always catches her.
  3. She can’t do anything without Edward.
  4. And when he leaves she attempts to commit suicide.
  5. Meyer is living out her own fantasies by writing about Bella, who is clearly herself.
  6. The books aren’t well written, just because every other word is a fancy adjective doesn’t make it good writing.
  7. All the rules Meyer sets for being a vampire are broken by the end of the series.
  8. Not only that, she breaks rules set by more esteemed authors.
  9. The world population will come to an end because all girls who read this book will think they are Bella and will wait for their Edward to come until they are old. And he’ll never come.
  10. Bella almost dies fifty thousand times, but Edward always saves her. This is boring.
  11. Edward is too perfect and has no flaws either. Even vampires should have flaws besides wanting to suck human blood because it’s natural to them.
  12. The reason the books became so popular is because Bella has no personality and any loser can put themselves in her shoes.
  13. If Bella is so ‘plain’, why do so many guys fall for her within the first two chapters?
  14. Bella teaches women to let the man handle everything, which pretty much is a huge step backward for women everywhere, who have fought for equality.
  15. Isn’t it convenient that her father always leaves her alone and doesn’t question her? Real parents aren’t that way.
  16. Lack of character development.
  17. Bella is a useless, whining, doll that suddenly has become the idol for girls everywhere.
  18. People say that Twilight is better than Harry Potter. Guess what? WRONG.
  19. Edward is extremely possessive, border-line abusive, and boring as anything.
  20. It’s too cliché.
  21. This book contains no real sex, so it’s not really a vampire novel.
  22. Read Anne Rice – those are vampires, not the girly men that Meyer has created.
  23. You don’t have to describe the character every two pages, we know all about Edward’s ‘perfectly toned chest’ the fourth time she mentions it.
  24. Bella reflects upon herself through the entire novel to tell important plot developments. Hey Meyer, ever heard of “Show, don’t tell”?
  25. She never uses the word fangs in the entire book series, and it’s supposedly about vampire.
  26. Her vampires sparkle. Enough said.
  27. Supposedly Meyer never uses the word ‘said’ in the entire first book, instead using breath.
  28. There is too much face touching.
  29. It’s predictable, and childish.
  30. We read the entire series just to laugh at the stupidity of it.
  31. Meyer can’t think of original names. The only original name she used was Rennesme, which is combination of two names and doesn’t count.
  32. Vampires can’t get people pregnant. SPOILER!
  33. Vampire baseball was just a disgrace.
  34. People think Meyer is the best writer ever.
  35. The plot drags on forever, when it really could have been completed in two books.
  36. Wow, yet another ‘original’ plot of forbidden love.
  37. Why is it called the Twilight Series if only one book is titled Twilight?
  38. It’s too easy to mock. Go on Youtube, how many mocks on Twilight do you see?
  39. They use a drug reference in a book written for ten-year-olds.
  40. Stephanie Meyer creates some interesting characters ie: Jasper and Alice. She then ignores them, and gives them no development.
  41. Every Other Facebook bumper sticker is about Twilight/Edward. EVERY OTHER ONE.
  42. Fangirls are so blinded by their love for Edward that they don’t realize the book is terrible.
  43. Stephen King agrees that Stephanie Meyer can’t write ‘worth a darn’.
  44. It’s stupid.
  45. Bella.
  46. Bella is Edward’s beard.
  47. Meyer wrote four books about nothing, really.
  48. Straight men sparkle?
  49. It’s teeming with grammatical errors.
  50. Bella Swan means beautiful swan, which is horribly cheesy.
  51. Edward Cullen is sparkly; crows like sparkly things.
  52. Do any guys actually like Twilight?
  53. If the first 200 pages of your book rely on the mystery of a character’s identity, don’t slap “First, Edward was a vampire” on the back cover.
  54. There’s far too little actual conflict in the story. But this probably stems from having a flawless main character.
  55. They fall in love way too quickly and it seems fake because no one falls in love instantly, especially teenagers.
  56. They only love each other because she smells good and he’s hot. There’s no other given reason why.
  57. It’s just not healthy to teach young girls that True Love involves the guy watching you while you sleep.
  58. Edward is HOT. We get it.
  59. She had only been in Forks for a month when Edward had been watching her sleep for two months.
  60. There’s something disturbing about Carlisle turning only teenagers into vampires.
  61. All Twilight fans are insane, proved by several responses to criticism such as…

    “What is your name, address and phone number, just so that i can track you down ank kill You with my super awesom vampire powers THAT I AQUIRED FROM READING THE SERIES!!!!!!!!!!”

  62. And this…

    “do you WANT a cult of angry twilight luvers like mysef at your doorstep at night trying to behead you????? you shouldnt voice an absurd oppinion like this on the internet.”

  63. And this…

    “you must have not read much good litterature in youre life, because if you cannot appreciate the quality of this art…..YOU ARE MENTALLY UNSOUND!!!!!!!”

  64. Isn’t funny how Twilight fans can’t spell and use proper capitalization? By the way, 61, 62, and 63 are real quotes.
  65. The reason Edward can’t read Bella’s mind is because she doesn’t have one.
  66. T. Pain would totally win Bella’s heart and beat up Edward because he’s on a boat.
  67. Edward hits on the school faculty to get out of classes.
  68. We applaud Stephanie Meyer, as she’s got to be a rich woman by now, having found her forte in the insane cult of teenage girls who go rabid over her writings.
  69. Vampires vs. werewolves (isn’t that a Facebook application and such a original idea?)
  70. There’s nothing worse than a fan girl going insane over a fictional guy. It’s rather pathetic actually, so, um, yeah, get a life and keep reading those books, chickies.
  71. This book was not worth the paper on which it was printed.
  72. Bella has no goals and no future, her life revolves around Edward.
  73. WWJTFD: What Would a Judgmental Twilight Fan Do? Answer: attempt to attack with the ‘cool vampire powers’ they gained from reading the series. Awesome!
  74. Even if you like the book, it doesn’t live up to its hype.
  75. Edward is a good VILF, that’s it.
  76. “And I cried numerous times upon realising there would never be an Edward in this world.” – quoted from Almuvira Anona on Yahoo Answers.
  77. A hundred years difference = pedophile.
  78. It’s a co-dependent relationship stripped down to the bare essentials. Girl: “I can’t live without you. I want to change myself to be with you.” Boy: “If you leave me, I will kill myself.”
  79. Stephanie Meyer must really be into pedophilia: first Edward and Bella, now Jacob and Renesseme? SPOILER.
  80. New hot couple name for Bella and Edward = Bedward
  81. You may think Edward Cullen is smart and fast, but Chuck Norris could take him.
  82. Bella’s only deep thoughts are, ‘Edward is so perfect. I love him.’
  83. The only reason I kept reading was to see if Bella could redeem herself by getting over him.
  84. Jacob, who didn’t abuse Bella and was nice to her, was dumped and she chose Edward. Hmm, masochistic much?
  85. Ms. Meyer writes the way I did when I was twelve years old, doodling in my journal.
  86. “It would have been much better if Jacob and Edward discovered they were gay: no sequels, no whiny Bella. Amen to that.”
  87. Many people have enjoyed the making of this, many have helped with it too…in other words lots of people hate Twilight.
  88. You are allowed to have your own opinion, just like we are allowed to have ours. Get over it. Twilight fans don’t seem to understand that though and attack at the mention of flaw in the book.
  89. Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.
  90. “Cause it’s dumb.” – Random Person on the Street
  91. “It’s annoying as hell.” – Random Person on the Street #2
  92. Martin Luther would not have not have approved if the book was written during his lifetime.
  93. Harry Potter could beat Edward any day with his magic powers.
  94. It’s offensive to the entire human race, both male and female.
  95. The book was so bad we wrote 95 reasons why we hate it.
2421
Liked it
Liked this? Share it!
Tweet this! StumbleUpon Reddit Digg This! Bookmark on Delicious Share on Facebook
1,684 Comments
  1. Noraowolf
    Posted March 19, 2009 at 7:22 am

    You’re as right as hell.

  2. Posted March 19, 2009 at 9:27 pm

    I got half way through book one, and couldn’t go any further. It was a lot of talking…a LOT of talking.

  3. Ex-Bosnian Riot Officer
    Posted March 19, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    wow. couldn’t agree any better. Twilight sucks as hell.

  4. Blink182Fan
    Posted March 28, 2009 at 11:29 pm

    Lol Bella has a man voice ^_^

  5. Posted March 28, 2009 at 11:37 pm

    I agree on every point.

  6. Cammy
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:21 am

    Wonderful–couldn’t agree more.

    Comment on number 9 though–I would hope that at least a FEW girls were smarter than that (myself included). After all, not everyone worships the ground Mrs. Meyer walks on.

  7. Julie
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:51 am

    While I don’t think Twilight is the greatest book ever, I think you’re reasons are pretty lame. I think a lot of people are angry because someone became a HUGE “success” on such a simple idea, that I personally had seen plastered all over online fiction communities (quizilla, fictionpress, etc.) years before Twilight came out. I read a lot of stories on those sites that were far better and more original than Twilight, but I wouldn’t go so far to say that Twilight is a HORRIBLE book.

    It obviously appeals to young girls, and I don’t see why people are so keen to crush them by telling them that’s it’s a horrible book and a waste of time. I’ve read books that were far worse, but I don’t see anyone bashing those nearly as much as people are bashing Twilight. I’ve read every book in the series, and while I definitely wouldn’t say they are my “favorite” books, they were enjoyable in a sort of this-is-entertaining-and-I-don’t-have-to-think-that-hard sort of way.

    So in summary, while I agree with some of your reasons, I think the vast majority are pretty insubstantial and lame. There are definitely a lot of better books out there, but there are also a lot more that are worse. In all, I think it’s a good book, and for whatever reason, you are writing out of spite or jealousy or some other uncalled for emotion.

  8. -shrug-
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:53 am

    To post #12, Not even: Of course it’s the authors opinion. That’s obvious. And the sentence “It’s awesome, you make stupid points that rely on NO fact.” DUH. It’s a fictional book, it’s not based on fact in the first place. Also, the author of the list is female, not a ’sir’.

    I haven’t read the books, not interested, but it’s a list people, a list. It’s something that states someone’s opinion, and probably meant to be humorous. Get over it.

    To posts 10 and 11, thank you for good grammar. :]

  9. Forserious?
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:56 am

    Umm, Real quick bring it down a notch. Okay, so This is the Internets (this is referring to comments #9,11,&12) Yes you are allowed to have your opinion and yes The person who made the list is. I understand that you don’t like reading about people badmouthing your favorite book, BUT, THIS IS THE INTERNET Seriously, The author is ALLOWED to post his/her opinions here, If they didn’t what would the internet be filled with, I don’t understand why you read the list, why just be like “Oh a list badmouthing Twilight, I like Twilight, I best not read this, for fear that I may become enraged…” Just calm down. Please? or don’t read posts that upset you

  10. Fail
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:59 am

    If you read the books you know exactly why…they don’t have fangs…read more variations of vampire books they’re all different, do you make fun of Elves in Lord of the rings because they’re tall and beautiful when honestly in older times elves where either short little things that were closely related to fairies or the little people that help Santa? I don’t think so, so drop the whole “I thought we were talking about vampires” bit. And who ever said vampire novels had to be sex filled to be vampire novels? Your a perverted jackass!

    She can’t think of original names? what the heck? yeah because Jasper is an everyday name…and so is Esme and the last name Cullen, grow up.

  11. Misses Angel and Buffy
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:05 am

    Isn’t the wafewolf Jacob a pedophile in a sense? I mean hes in love with their baby… right? at least thats what my sister tells me. And she doesnt see whats wrong with him loving a toddler. oh well- joss weadon is in his ivory tower laughing.

  12. Julie
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:05 am

    I do realize you probably meant the “it has to have sex to be a vampire book” bit as a joke, but I just thought I would point out that you considered Anne Rice’s books to be vampire books, and I have a hard time remembering any substantial sex scenes in there.

  13. huh..
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:06 am

    Ok I liked Twilight but this list is pretty funny (and mostly true), so to you other people who say who ever made this list didn’t read it, I think they did. Stefanie Meyers really did not create good role models for any one in these books. Her other book The Host was much better.

  14. Just a Stumbler
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:09 am

    Does Twilight really have grammatical errors? (I haven’t read it.)

  15. the bunny
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:23 am

    Yo, #25 Connor: You don’t get it, go to youtube “i’m on a boat” T-Pain would so win. This book is perfect for teenage girls with relativley inactive imaginations, beyond that, it’s tripe.

  16. Mariel
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:25 am

    I’m a reader, wide reader.. I’m no expert at all, I think that there’s no such thing as read all. I also believe that there’s no book in the world that suck that much that doesn’t give you something..
    This saga left me the idea that I’m growing up, and the fanatism and idealistic clichés works for some books. I’m not saying that the books are inmature, it’s the kind of books that atracks youg people.
    And it’s true, every author it’s free to put their own rules, the exciting part it’s being innovative, congruent, funny.. and I didn`t saw any chalenge on the “new” vampires, that’s just me.
    Anyway, for some people work, for some other don’t.
    So don’t hang up on jokes, unless it offends you, and if it does, some of it might be true. ;)

  17. Jessica
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:28 am

    I feel like you are ignorant and can’t accept change. Why can’t someone write a book that sways from the typical “vampire” without people getting butthurt over it? how cute. Books are books, if you don’t like it move on

  18. hannah
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:30 am

    i like how most of the people who have commented this have attacked you because its your opinion, yet they seem to forget that by saying the book is great they themselves are voiceing an opinion. She’s allowed to not like it just as much as you liked it. So stop attacking her.

    I enjoyed the books but also agree that they were poorly written and about twice the length they needed to be. But most of it was enjoyable (aside from new moon which spent far too long going on about Bella being depressed). The books obviously arent going to win the nobel prize for literature, but as a bit of fluff, they are fairly entertaining. If your willing to take them as what they are a written soap opera about a vampire who glitters and the girl who falls for him its an enjoyable but not enlightening read.

  19. Sarah
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:30 am

    I read all four books. I hated them immensely but was oddly drawn to finish them, excited to finish them even, which makes me feel more than just a little bit less then I was once.

    The writing is terrible, the errors are to numerous to count and the heroine is nothing but a sad sap of a girl, illustrated even more startlingly in the movie, yes I watched it, I beat myself with a soap filled sock afterward.

    My daughter has Edward and Bella posters in her room, I can’t even bring myself to look at them without thinking of the contradictions to my parenting they espouse. I let her love them anyway, against my better judgment. I am sure she will not grow up to be a ridiculous woman who relies on men for her overall satisfaction and success in life. If she does turn into that, most likely I won’t be blaming it on Twilight.

  20. J-bird
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:31 am

    You do realize that you used the reason of the “they sparkle” like 5 or 6 times….just like “we got it Edwards HOT or the reason of his built chest after the “fourth time she says it”…yeah we get it…you don’t think its right that they sparkle, CONGRATS!

  21. ZL
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 5:45 am

    You’re reasons are about as good as the reasons some love the series. Could have done a lot better. And make sure your semantics are correct before you criticize others’. You left out at least half a dozen “is.”

    A few snorts and at least one chuckle… try harder next time.

  22. Damian
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 5:59 am

    You left off the best life lesson….

    If men could read women’s minds…..

    THEY WOULD NEVER LOVE THEM.

    So, of course, the one mind he can’t read…is fascinating.

  23. CF
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 6:28 am

    I agree. i read the books simply to understand what the fuss is about. However, thank god for them. Now, thanks to Twilight a whole section of society will never reproduce thanks to their obsession waiting for their Edward. And this should be celebrated… who would want weirdos that are obsessed completely by fictional characters to reproduce anyway?

  24. Gabrielle
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 6:43 am

    omg i squee’d at this… Even though I love the book im not some crazy fan who cant see that yeah there are flaws… I absolutly loved the harry potter comment. So true.

  25. Dukky
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 6:53 am

    I agree, Twilight (and the entire series) is grossly over rated. I also agree with most of your reasons as to why it is stupid; although your accusations of terrible grammar would have been more effective if not for your own errors.

    By the way, Harry Potter was over rated too.

    If I were to say one positive thing it would be this: The books may be average and a little trashy, but at least they have kids reading.

  26. Kate
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 6:56 am

    I have never personally read the book, so I can’t say whether I think it is good or not- That’s kind of a matter of opinion anyway. I do, however, think it is a bit silly for people to become so obsessed over such a thing. It’s a book for cripes sakes- good or bad. Read and then move on with reality.

  27. wow.
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:03 am

    I do believe that some of you all need to review the basic rules of either British grammar or American grammar. Yes, they are different, and many of you violated multiple rules in one sentence. To those of you who are clearly seniors in high school, it’s called a dictionary and can help with the completion of words in the proper context. The post was funny, and reading the comments was like watching a car crash in slow-motion – I wanted to look away, but just couldn’t.

  28. Erin
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:03 am

    I LOVE YOU!!
    you are so right!!!
    =D
    Haha you made my night!

  29. Mrow
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:06 am

    I can’t tell which is more amusing, the list, or the flame war occurring in the comments ^_^ Good show!

  30. Jan
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:08 am

    It is just a story…….Everyone can like what they want….who cares if you don’t like it….or if you do like it??

  31. Zak
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:21 am

    This list made me laugh a few times, and although I’ll agree that a lot of your reasons for Twilight being crap are groundless, they still made me lol a little.

    I’m glad someone pointed out the fact that people saying your opinion is rubbish and shouldn’t be allowed to exist are showing an opinion themselves. However, I’m surprised that Twilight fans have been dissing someone for reading the series. How can you have a go at a person who has actually taken the time out of their life to give this series a chance?
    “You didn’t enjoy it, don’t read it.” Er, a little too late there really, seeing as you have to read it to actually know if you enjoy it or not first. Besides, like I said, at least the author of this list actually had the common decency to read the series before she attacked it.

    I’ll be honest, I haven’t read the series and I probably won’t just because it’s been hyped up so much and I’m now totally aware of the fact that it’s a complete and utter girly wet dream.
    For me, the only good things that came out of Twilight are A River Flows In You, by Yiruma, and Decode and I Caught Myself by Paramore.

    Oh, and I’ve also got to add that #89: “Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you” actually made me laugh so much and appreciate the author of this list. If they have good enough taste to have read/watched Death Note and to refer to it in a completely unrelated piece of writing then I high five them with all my heart.
    Hail Kira!

  32. Lisa
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:00 am

    Hahaha. This was AMAZING and yet sooooo true!
    I’m going to send it to all my fellow peers who are too obsessed with twilight.

  33. ShineTilly
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:03 am

    Numbers 69 and 70 have grammatical errors. Males and females are different sexes not different races. Otherwise I agree with most of your comments.

  34. J
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:07 am

    People have said, “It’s your opinion who cares.” As an 8th grade English teacher I care. I don’t want my students reading this crap literature. I’d rather they read Playboy and Hustler.

  35. B
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:31 am

    I have a doctorate level degree and majored in English literature. I understand the criticism. It is not great literature and not an example of healthy feminism. With that being said, I enjoyed all 4 books. It ends too cleanly, but for those of us who read fluff for escapism, it is enjoyable.

    #54, at least kids are reading. I am not advocating throwing out Shakespeare and reading it as part of a curriculum, but people can read for enjoyment’s sake. Frankly, I care about that.

    You are entitled to your opinion, but many of your comments were whiny and immature… Maybe there is some pot calling the kettle black.

  36. JustMe
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:32 am

    Thank you, reading this list was truly entertaining and I certainly agree with most of it. Sure, today it’s a good thing to get kids to read a book, but please not something as stupid and cheesy as this… Rather go for Harry Potter, it’s of unmeasurably higher quality in every aspect, be it character development or plot.

  37. Moi
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:02 am

    I agree that Twilight is an awful series and that the fangirls can be annoying as anything but in reality when you read some of this list you are just as bad as them. Seriously, when you justify not liking something because “so and so doesn’t like it” you sound just as much as a follower as all those you are trying to make fun of. Also, though I understand that this is supposed to be written to comedic effect, when you make a list of reasons to dislike things, try to avoid things like 64 and 95. They really are not reasons, not even opinions really. Just space filler.

  38. Kyle
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:12 am

    Wow, you commenters take these things far too seriously. Twilight was awfully written and had no character development, nor did it have any original ideas. It was predictable, boring and tiresome. As for the movie of it. It was the same.

    Those are facts, not opinions, and are valid. ;)

  39. Jax
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:14 am

    Your my hero

  40. Taco
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:55 am

    you are awesome. Also, your captcha isn’t hard as balls to read.

  41. Dan
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:02 am

    I won’t go so far as to say that you’re a complete idiot for hating Twilight, in fact, I won’t even get mad, but please don’t get snarky at others for reading a book and enjoying it. Maybe nobody in that book is really well developed. Maybe they fall in love too quickly for it to be real. Maybe it’s not a perfectly written book. I don’t care. I, for one, read books just so I can enjoy them. If you didn’t like the book, that’s perfectly fine, but please don’t go around telling other people that they’re complete and utter fools for liking a book that was written to be enjoyed. If most of those fans are teenage girls, well, I guess we can see who the book was written for.
    And please, if you are going to tell people what a bad book it is and why nobody should read it and why it should be burned for the good of humanity, give good reasons. Don’t throw in stupid things that aren’t true. Or at least, be reasonable with what you put in.
    Ah, whatever. I probably digressed in there accidentally.
    One last thing: you said that Twilight fans don’t have good grammar, right? Well, look right above my post. “Your my hero”. No apostrophe, no period. Unless you’re going to get people to agree with you who love taking the extra five seconds to make sure their three words are properly written, don’t use that as a reason not to read the books. Good God, I could use this last thing as a reason why someone should read the series. Well, no, ’cause it’d be a very bad reason, and anyone worth two grains of salt would be able to see as much. Ah whatever. You’re entitled to your opinion. I just hope you read the books before passing judgement. You can’t judge a book by its readers alone. Not all the people who read the books fit into one of two categories. It is possible to enjoy them without becoming a giggly fangirl.
    At least I hope so. It would be extremely awkward if I grew a uterus. I’d have a lot to explain if I ever got a girlfriend.
    And on that light note, I’m off. Have fun arguing on the internet, boys!

  42. Steven
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:20 am

    Your list is insta-win because of #66 alone.

    I’M ON A BOAT!

  43. Becca
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:35 am

    Rofl, love it! Here’s one for you… a friend of mine had a coworker tell him that his girlfriend dumped him because he “wasn’t anything like her Edward”. He thought she was cheating on him… until he found out she meant Edward from Twilight! Can you imagine being dumped because you weren’t enough like a fictional douchbag?

  44. Captain
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    lol, I like the post.

    But I have to say that I enjoy reading the comments when anything is Anti-Twilight. Most of the time it’s really entertaining. Especially when the psychotic fans get wind of it.

  45. Grammar Guy
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    It’s probably not a good idea to complain about poor grammar when your own list is just as guilty.

  46. hamburger
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    The list and posts are much more entertaining than any piece of fiction. Good job. Here is an idea for a book. All Twilight fans are given an invitation to meet the REAL Edward in Arizona. They are directed through a curtain where they drop into the Grand Canyon never to be heard from again. Who invited them? Stephen King, because for once he wants to write truly scary non-fiction. Twilight fans are scary.

  47. esa
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    Grammar Guy: She is not publishing a book, she’s writing a list.

    I don’t understand why people compare HP to Twilight in the first place. I’ve read Twilight and a Mary Sue cannot be compared to a wizard fighting for what is right.

  48. Just my opinion
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    I remember I was so obsessed with vampires when I was middle school (before all of this Twilight drama emerged). I loved Annette Curtis Klause’s vampire love stories, Anne Rice, Dracula, and even the bloody Cirque Du Freak series and all the other girls would think I’m weird.
    What now freaks? At least the stuff I read had substance and some form of message. You have no idea how sick I am hearing about all the retarded Twilight book reports in my English HONORS class. “OH the grammar and writing wasn’t very good, but it was a romantic story” To bad that whole forbidden vampire love crap was written a bazillion times before in a BETTER format.
    Thank goodness I started high school and got preoccupied with all the school work just in time before the Twilight plague could get to me.

  49. nananana
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    dear lord! I looked at the comments, and wow! can nothing be spared from angry people attacking other peoples ideas? we know you Twilight lovers enjoy that book series, but some people don’t like it. This list was made for people who didn’t/don’t like Twilight. if you don’t like it, then don’t read a list called “why to hate Twilight”. I had contemplated being an asshat, but that would make those of you who love Twilight even more pissed off.

  50. Michelle
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    I have read all the books. I liked them, but I wouldn’t call myself a fanatic. Your list however had me laughing. And better yet I think a lot of them are true, which is where I am at a conflict.

    I enjoyed the books because there is no base of truth in them whatsoever, and people thinking there is, are just crazy. But that’s just it I read this books to relax and read something I think would be fun to read. There are a lot of mistakes in the book and plot holes but I think it was enjoyable as a book to read on a weekend since it isn’t exactly heavy reading.

    And as for Stephanie Meyers, she is living the dream. Playing on the emotions teenagers feel (Falling in ‘love’ for no reason but looks) and made a lot of money for it. I’m just mad I didn’t think of it first. I think she knew that she couldn’t write a novel that would change literature for the better, so she wrote silly little things for money.

    As for your list, I love it! I agree with it all and I think you should add more. But I will continue to like Twilight.

    Also, you are right, Harry Potter would kick Edward’s ass!

  51. Bebe2
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    i love twilight but i think the writing and stuff sucks :)

    um and also harry potter is better

  52. Narwhal
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    I hate Twilight, however, your list is unimaginative. All you do is attack people because they like something, and your jokes aren’t funny. With one exception, “66. T. Pain would totally win Bella’s heart and beat up Edward because he’s on a boat.” That’s pretty funny.

  53. Stefanie
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    I have to admit that I read the first book, kind of. I really don’t remember the book at all. It was that lack luster. I can deal. I was just in high school and I swear to all Gods in the universe that if I hear one more pathetic, no brained teenager scream that Twilight is the end all be all, I will go Clockwork Orange* on them. That’s right, classical music, Twilight,and no way to shut their eyes. Soon, they will be disinclined to make a “Twilight will pwn your soul” comment. Besides we all know that Bella Lugosi and Gary Oldman, can truly play vampires as they were meant to be seen, through Bram Stocker’s eyes.

    *Clockwork Orange was written by Burgess, all right doth belong to him.

  54. Tara
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    Haha yeah.. also.. in the book, it says that their little clan are all like vegitarians.. so does that mean that Bella is like a cow? XD Beistiality, much?

  55. Hey
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    You know what i think is funny. I’ve actually started reading these series & liked it… But i agree w/EVERY point you’ve made on here. It’s definitley “CLiche” & in no way is it Better then Harry Potter.. absolutely no way!

    Oh & You know I’ve been thinking that the WHOLE TIME… “Why is it called the Twilight Series?” Like w/ Harry Potter, that’s the name of the series but Twilight… There’s like no name… I get so confused everytime i ask for it at the library. I’m like do i just ask for the New Moon or do i say New Moon, the sequel to Twilight or do i call it New Moon from the Twilight Series (which never makes any sense to me). I have NO Clue. But yeah good job… I guess.

    LONG LIVE Harry Potter.!!!

  56. mel
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    Okay I really had to comment… The list made me laugh… a lot… and I agree with several points, especially the bits involving sparkling, grammatical errors, Stephan King saying she can’t write, and Bella being an attempt at a flawless character (Mary-Sue anyone… yes I read fanfiction… and the bit about Edward’s character being a ‘mystery’ and ‘Edward is a Vampire’ being posted on the back cover.

    So for the record… I have read about 250 pages into the first book. I will admit that the genre of teen romance is not my cup of tea. I tend not to read romance romance at all really… the genre does nothing for me. I gave up on Twilight (and I really, really tried to read it) because I simply could not stand it. I didn’t particularly like it but as a writer and a major reader, it made me cringe. Horribly.

    I want to point out that there are loads of really good things about the books. They’re popular which means they get kids to read, especially young teens girls, and reading is good for them. They’ll look into the books in the sections labeled ‘If you like Twilight read…’ and thus be exposed to more material, and that’s good. Literacy is good. The book itself, written is not horrible… I admit this.

    Now this is not a bashing, but you have to understand, that Twilight is not a good work of literature. It’s okay, mediocre at best. There’s a million things she could have done better, the major one which jumps out at me is rewriting the vampire myths in a different way because honestly, the sparkling, is hokey. It’s ridiculous and I’m a big fan of old horror stories and films and legends and though I accept that she had to find a way around the sun myth for the book to work, she didn’t do it very well.

    The writing itself could have been a million times better if she wrote it 3rd person (again… only read 250 pages into the 1st book) because quite frankly, Bella boarders to much on a imperfectly perfect, mary-sue type character and I honestly what to know what her editor was thinking when she let Meyer get away with not giving Bella a total personality makeover. If we were taken out of her head she could have gone places with it. It would have the potential to be less monotonous, to take a more, omniscient point of view on the thing, which would have been neat, especially if she still refrained from mentioning that Edward was a vampire until 200 pages in (and didn’t tell her audience this on the back cover). It would have pumped things up.

    Also, for the record, this is perfectly fine that she can’t write very well. It was her first book and she was writing in a genre that sells books through crappy writing. Honestly. Romance books are full of clichés, lots of talking, lots of expressing, little plot, and just a lot of crappy writing. That is what makes it entertaining, that’s how the genre sells. There is NOTHING wrong with that at all because it works. Similar to comedy in films… the straight foreword comedy tends to suck as movies (think… dodgeball, anchorman… ) but that’s okay because we don’t watch them to be moved, we watch them to be entertained. Teen romance is great because it’s entertaining and it gets kids to read, but the writing is generally (generally, not exclusively) crap. And that’s okay.

    I think (and as a writer… I’m not published but I certainly have the ability to recognize very good writing and not so good writing, weather or not I actually enjoy the book itself) that ultimately she did not write a good book and that is really where my issue lies. I have a problem when people claim that it is a good book because honestly… no it’s not. It has virtues, absolutely, but the writing is not good at all, the characters need serious work, the plot… yeah I’m not gonna even go into that… and she’s defacing a really great and creepy legend, not making it more beautiful.

    So the list is kind of harsh, maybe a little, not very well informed (yeah my articulation went out the window… it’s late and I’m emotional and tired) but I found it highly funny and I just wanted to put a couple thoughts in.

  57. Tyler
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    I too hate Twilight. However, this list is almost as badly written as the series itself.

  58. DarkfireSG
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    I’ve heard nothing but bad things about this. definitely not gonna waste my time. Just the synopsis is enough to make me think its dumb.

  59. Andrea
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    Love Harry Potter.

    Twilight itself= meh. It’s not the worst thing I’ve ever seen. I am rather disturbed by their relationship, which is unhealthy at best, codependent and emotionally abusive at its worst.

    Ultimately, Buffy did everything Myers is trying to do 500x better, with more complexity and authenticity, 10 years ago.

    Twilight fans are what make me go crazy. My sister is one. But she’s not one of the abusive ones. I can make fun of it to her and she sticks out her tongue and moves on. I’ve seen people get seriously chewed out for so much as mentioning they aren’t crazy about the series, though. That’s not cool, kids. I’ll defend Harry & co to the last, but I’m not gonna attack someone outright just for saying they don’t like him. I understand. If they want to get into it, I’ll get into it, but here’s a tip, Twilighters–just saying, “You are so wrong they are the best you are stupid!!!!” isn’t a defense, it’s a straw man attack. Ah well.

  60. Ash
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    I love how the fans are reacting. Everything they say proves you right.

  61. fat queen
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    I couldn’t even finish the first book. I simply can’t read page after page of how Edward is perfect and Bella can’t, for some reason, live without him.
    My main problem is figuring out why Edward liked Bella so much, especially after getting to know her. She has zero personality.
    If he can read minds, I’m sure that in the span of a hundred years he read some pretty intelligent minds…
    Also, the kids choose to do high school over and over again. I wish Meyer would have explained how they got driver’s licenses or permits with old birth certificates. I mean, we can’t really ignore the real fact like these just so the story can go smoothly and Edward can go to school and drive around…
    Good job coming up with the list. I enjoyed reading it more than reading Twilight!

  62. Abby
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    I agree on most of your points. Most of the girls and women I know that obsess over Twilight, are actually very rational people. I don’t understand what makes them say, “TWILIGHT IS TEH BEST BOOK EVAR!!11!” Maybe it’s because the majority of those women don’t read much?

    The lesson here; make your young daughters read. Give them classics instead of letting them read Twilight.

  63. Emma.
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    65 is sosososo true.

    “Wasted money on the stupid film. But its a fact that twilight fans r super defensive abt that film. WTF im not allowed to say it stinks instead let u bore me to hell abt its story????????
    PS Its a super Queer movie”

    and even better…”OMFG!!1111!!! TwiLite is sou gay and dum!!11one!!!”

    Twilight haters’ grammar isn’t so hot either :D

    Twilight is overrated, its true. But y’know…its alright to read. If you don’t go in thinking “THIS IS GONNA BE AMAAAAZING.”

  64. Emma.
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    Wait, one more thing.

    Twilight gets people who don’t read into reading. That’s good enough for me.

  65. Ria
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    You and the others who compiled this list are my heroes. Seriously. I utterly despise this series. It is poorly written and I completely agree with your statement about adjectives, because, no just since you can use a bunch of adjectives does not mean you are a real writer. Give a first grader a thesaurus and I’m sure that kid will be able to produce something of more substance.

    Yes, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, so you crazy little fangirls out there need to get your knickers out of a knot and calm the hell down. I mean, just the other day I was in Barnes & Noble and saw the Twilight books out on a table in a display for a middle school’s book wishlist. I remarked to my friend, a fellow Twilight hater, “These books are absolutely horrendous. They should not be allowed out here.” A girl sitting nearby heard me and looked at me with such loathing. She immediately slammed her book shut, stiffly stood up and walked away, shooting me death glares as she left. I mean, come on, honestly? Grow up.

    Want to read a real vampire series? Try the Sookie Stackhouse novels. Anyone can make a book into a movie, but a book into an appraised television series on HBO, now that requires actual literary skill.

  66. Kiwi Pepper
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    well, i read the first book thats actually called twilight when it first came out and thought it was the best book ever. i used to watch buffy and angel alot and loved the whole vampire shmeel, but i never read the sequel, new moon. then came the twilight craze. girls all over my school carried it around in their bookbags and were always reading it and talking about it and then i realized, why did i like that book? really, why did i like it?? and i started reading these things, and the steven king review on the book comparing it to harry potter. then i started reading new moon and i just couldnt keep reading it. i tried, i really tried. i thought, if i liked twilight so much when i was younger (i only read it once, while i read the whole harry potter series quickly and more than once) why dont i like new moon now?? so i put the book down and i will never read it again. i can already tell the rest of the series sucks.

  67. Lydia
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    I used to be good but now it just sucks and i think the only reason people think its ‘good literature’ is because they don’t know what good literature is because they are 13 years old and because the book is really easy to read so they think that’s what it means. Try Dracula, now that’s a good book.

  68. Rizzle
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    To post #17

    LOTR sucked just as bad as Twilight.

  69. Sam
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    66. T. Pain would totally win Bella’s heart and beat up Edward because he’s on a boat.

    This one made me laugh so hard. When I was in High School I liked these books, but the more obsessed people become the more I want to just forget I ever read them.

  70. Really!?
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    As much as the purists may want to disagree, literature is about making money. You may dislike the story, you may find grammatical errors, you may even think the message is dangerous, but if it SELLS then maybe instead of wasting your time compiling a list of why “Twilight” sucks, you may want to study why it has succeeded and see if you have the talent or ability to do so yourself. If you can’t make as much money and as many sales as this author has, then no matter what, she is more SUCCESSFUL than you are or may ever be.

  71. ShilohSkellyton
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    I read the whole series so no one can accuse me of not reading the books and not knowing what I’m talking about (although i don’t remember half of it because quite frankly nothing notable went on), and i read Twilight before anyone besides people that lived in Forks (my best friend’s grandma) and ate lunch at this small cafe. My friend bought it because she thought it had something to do with forks, and decided that it was half decent but not worth much rave and passed it on to me read. It’s not a horrible book because quite honestly there have been worse written, however in no way is Twilight worth half the hype its getting, in fact it should’ve stayed in the clearance sections of those small cafes in rather remote areas instead of filling shelves at every book store in the US. The poorly developed plot, lack of real drama or irony, and dull characters made for a very recycled book. The only reason i kept reading was with the false hope that eventually there would be some wild plot twist to amount to the hype. Needless to say that never happened. Now many of the fan’s excuses include; but it’s so romantic, the moral of the story is grand, and she uses such imagery. There are authors that use much better imagery than stephanie meyer. At any local bookstore you could pick up a better written romance. Does love conquer all? I don’t know but i surely don’t need a long drawn out series about a handsome vampire and a blande heroine to give me a generic answer.

    As for this list?
    Spot on.

  72. Soapboxguy@gmail.com
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    These books are bad for this country sort of like McDonald’s is bad for this country. You can make the argument that “at least kids are reading” but with that same logic you can say “at least kids are eating” in reference to mikey D’s.

    It’s mindless fluff. It is a rationalization and people are wasting their time not being challenged by books. There are many great books that also manage to be good, entertaining reads. Even in Young Adult fiction (like Twilight is described as).

    There are books like Perks of Being a Wallflower, Feed, and Catcher in the Rye. None of which are the greatest books but at least they provoke thought in the reader.

    Twilight is mindless drivel that reinforces sexism and unoriginality. They aren’t even well written like Harry Potter is.

    People need to start reading their veggies instead of filling their minds with mcdonald’s.

    America is getting stupider and it’s things like Twilight leading these kids to believe that they understand what literature is that are causing it.

    Read something at least a little bit smart people.

  73. Nadine
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    Ok, to number 15, seriously, if your parent or your friend’s parent isn’t like that, doesn’t mean ALL parent’s aren’t like that. I recently visited my friends house, and we went inside, she got her keys and money and just left.
    Do you know ALL the parents in the world? I’m pretty sure you don’t.
    This whole list is stupid, everyone has their own opinion, right? You shouldn’t be against their opinion just because it isn’t the same as your nonsense.
    Ok maybe Twilight wasn’t so well written, but it’s a huge success and you should deal with it.
    EDWARD CULLEN! TWILIGHT! (=

  74. Pwnzord
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    I read the entire first book. I didn’t like it, but I don’t think it should be hated. However, I *was* disappointed by the lack of love (character development) shown for Jasper and Alice though (number 40). However, even with this major flaw, at least Meyer has written a popular book and made serious money off of it. More than you can say for yourself, right? XD

  75. Alex
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    89 made my day. Thank you so much. I do enjoy the twilight series, so dont go assissinating anyone or I’ll have to go all Ryuzaaki/Nate river/Mihael Kael on you.

  76. Ali
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    I have to say one thing, Stephanie Meyer is clearly brilliant because she successfully wrote an ill-thought out series and knew her target audience well enough to sell to them. She spent very little effort and good huge rewards for that effort. Small risk, big reward…that equals good business.

    Beyond that however, spot on. The books aren’t literature, they’re fan fiction. Albeit, author written fanfic.

  77. Kaitlyn
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    I actually liked Twilight (though I’ve only read the first book), but I still agree with everything on this list… lol It was an entertaining read, but in no way was it the literary masterpiece that the Twihards think it is.
    On that note, WTF to all the comments?? Jeez, some of these posters are just making themselves sound exactly as ridiculous as they’ve been accused of being.

  78. me
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    i hate twilight.

  79. B
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    Haha. I guess you’re right about some Twilight fans not being able to spell or understand that you’re stating your opinion. If you’re actually offended by reading this list (which I think is pretty funny and some of the reasons are legitimate), you’re digging your own hole. You make all Twilight fans look like the fat kids from high school who didn’t have any friends. Like Meyer.

    So what, if the list is stupid?

    And P.S. It’s not difficult to write a book if you know your target audience and have an editor. You people are a disgrace to the halfway literate portion of the human race.

  80. i agree with
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    1-8
    10-29
    35-36
    40
    43
    49-50
    53-57
    59-61
    69
    88
    94
    so basically i give you 45 reasons to hate twilight the others are either stupid or repeats no offence meant

  81. Maggie
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    I think that the list is amazing and hysterical. I only read page 2, thanks to StumbleUpon, but most people don’t understand that the basics of this was stuff nerds like us understand. T. Pain being on a boat is from an SNL Digital Short. Chuck Norris. Well, that sells itself. The fact that the majority of those defending a poorly written series, are choosing to ignore the bits and pieces they do understand:

    If someone writes about your poor grammar, stating something that you would most likely deny if guilty, you absolutely do not fight back with PROOF that it is a fact. All of the Twilight fans I know have HORRIBLE grammar and use chat speak on a daily basis, so thanks for proving that with your stupidity. Not the author, the obnoxious fan girls, which includes children, teens, and adults alike.

    Another factor that annoys me about the defenders, is that they don’t seem to understand that it is not necessary to post PARAGRAPHS of false reasoning. So maybe the reasons that the author gives are a bit far-fetched, but most of them are entirely true and cannot be denied. Stephanie Meyer has really nothing to be proud of except for the fact that a) She has tons of money and b) The money comes from a mob of rabid groupies that probably stalk her. Oh wait, NOT a plus.

    I’ll leave it all at that, because I know that I will probably be tracked down by said mob, and have my head bitten off for the mere fact that, the people against Twilight have the best intentions and reasoning. Even if I DID like Twilight, I would only admit that it is a funny and correct list.

    xoxo Meg

  82. msizzle
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    I would respect this list so much more if YOU had actually used correct grammar and spelling and did not leave words out.

  83. David Cartier
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    you people all need to get a life

  84. Me
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    By swearing, acting obnoxious or stating rude comments against the author of the blog, one reinforces the author’s ideas. If you enjoy the Twilight series, fine. Acting as if a puppy was just shot and eaten in front of you when someone criticizes Twilight diminishes your credibility.

    The Internet does allow for posting ones ideas freely and thus the author, all the commenters, and even myself may post what we wish. The author of the list has every right to post it. If people dislike the list, they are not required to read it on the hour every hour. They may offer a dissenting opinion however they wish. A dissenting opinion that is poorly phrased may not be useful.

    In conclusion this argument has gone on ad nauseam.

  85. Hippocrates
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 7:19 pm

    This list could’ve been great had you only used proper grammar and spelling… BE CAREFUL WITH YOUR CONTRACTIONS! Also, avoid repeating things MORE THAN TWICE! It starts to become very annoying.

  86. stumbler
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    must admit reading twilight made me appreciate Harry Potter and JK Rowling much more as a writer. I actually thought I was reading a bad fanfiction when I read twilight online. Twilight is seriously just an empty, empty series. The only characters worth anything are Jasper and Jacob but Meyer being the crappy writer she is, doesn’t realise this and relegates them to the dark.

  87. Cool, wait. no...
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    Hey wow, everyone totally has to comment even if they don’t have anything to say… wait… oh damnit all.

  88. casey
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    Haha I actually like the Twilight series, but I thought this was hilarious! It’s all so true. Those fan girls are insane.

  89. Candice
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    I agree with most of your points, and did, in fact, find the Twilight books predictable with little to no character development for the truly interesting characters. However, inexplicably, I love the series. I have read all four books several times and seen the movie twice. I am doubly embarrassed by this fact because I am not a mindless tweener fan girl – I am actually a married adult female, and have no known mental disorders. I explained to my husband that these books are like empty calories for my brain.

  90. Karla
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    Thank you for that! Twilight is a disgrace to the human population. I read the books, and im deeply ashamed of that.

  91. KarolineA
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    This make me smile, even laugh a little. And yes I am I huge Twilight fan. Own all the books, bought the movie, and went to a 12 o’clock showing of the movie. The books were far better than the movie was, the movie was a way to different. In my point-of-view the books were really good. I’ve read all kinds of literature but that doesn’t change the fact that I like Twilight. And I agree that Meyer was eh-okay on her writing, but you have to keep this is mind- this was her first book ever, and it all started with a creepy dream she had. Stephen King has written over 40 books with that he cannot judge an amateur writer. Anywho- Being a teenager, I can say that girls are head
    over heals for Edward because Meyer makes glittered men who watch you at night and is over protective sound damn sexy.

    And to the people who is totally bashing on Twilight, calm down. You’re just as bad as the people who are far too protective over Twilight.

  92. KarolineA
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    Oh, I also have no idea how many novels SK has written, I read only five so I guessed.. I goggled it and it turned out to be a lot more. Sorry Stephen King fans.

  93. Amber
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    So my friend sent me the link to this. I took the time to read it and found out two things: 1. Most of the reasons are repeated.. several times and 2. The Chuck Norris joke was absolutely ridiculous. Honestly, it was a little funny, but a complete waste of your time. If you hated Twilight (and the rest of the saga), why did you take the time to put all the reasons down when you could simply have said “The books suck.”?

    P.S. I loved the books.

  94. Holly
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    To all the stupid people making idiotic comments who are most likely under the age of twelve: You are just proving the author’s point. SHUT UP…..

    Author: You are completely correct. Harry Potter does PWN…..

  95. Roqulere
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:32 pm

    Yes the book and movie is tripe…and should be banned for sheer stupidity.

  96. Hippo.
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    This is amazing. It made my life.

    83. The only reason I kept on reading was to see if Bella could redeem herself by getting over him.

    That and I wanted to see who’d die first, Edward or Bella. Neither unfortunately.

  97. holy carp
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    apparently, it was a girl who posted this is a girl. sorry again for referring to you as the dude gender.

  98. a Stumbler
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    When I read #9, I just instantly thought to myself:
    “Good God, this guy’s right!”
    One of the better “why twilight sucks” lists I have seen on the net.
    (You’re right, Chuck Norris COULD beat the living hell out of Edward in an instant.)

  99. Kelsey
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    if you have enough time to post this…you obviously have no life which means you are right on par with those who read and/or are obsessed with the twilight series..

  100. holy carp
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    The creator of the list never mentioned Twilight fans as to having no life, nor mentioning that the creator had a life.

  101. Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    Honestly, I don’t think your list was very well-presented, and you repeated a lot of the same points more than once… Perhaps that was for effect.

    I wasn’t impressed with Twilight, but I can see why teenage girls would like it.
    Each to their own.

  102. Alicia
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    So, I was totally drawn into Twilight and read the series obsessively, and since I’m an English teacher the entire time I kept telling myself, “This writing really is god awful.” And it really is. Painfully god awful. But, I still went to see the movie, which was horribly done. I don’t know why the story still draws me in, I think I’m just delusional. But anyway, I just wanted to comment because I actually really enjoyed this list, particularly 69, 75, 80 and 81.

    Everyone just calm down, that woman made a boatload of money and Twilight will still go on even if people hate it. Basically, the world will not end just because people don’t agree with you :)

  103. Steve
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    Ok so I read the first book all the way through. My friend recommended it to me and told me it was “the best book he’d ever read.” So I gave it a shot. I got about halfway through it (dragging my ass the whole way through) and asked my friend how in the world he could think this was the best book ever. He swore to me that the last few chapters made it worth it. So I kept reading….and reading…and reading. Eventually I got through the entire book, and was still not understanding what was so great about it.

    I understand the appeal to the specific audience it was written for, pre- teens to late teens, primarily girls. I’m totally cool with people enjoying the book, to each their own and whatnot. What I still have trouble understanding is how it got to be so rediculously popular so quick. I mean seriously, my friend who recommended it to me was, at the time, a senior in high school who would never read a book out of pure enjoyment if his life depended on it (I know this because he told me). So my main gripe with this book is that I have no idea why people such as my friend, and hundreds of people like my friend, who have never taken to reading any books ever had suddenly become so obsessed with these books… it just makes no sense to me.

    And as far as it being good literature, people who think that were probably dropped on their head as a child….repeatedly…

  104. Krystal
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    personally I love the books, but I still think this is great. And all the obsessive fans get on my nerves too. We’re not all like that guys.

  105. Krystal
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    what I really don’t get though is why this book becoming popular has turned into world war 3. ITS JUST A BOOK. CALM DOWN. I don’t care if your part of the obsessive group or pissed off group but would everyone get over it?! It’s just a book! and you guys realize that the more you complain about it, the more known you make it, and that makes this go on longer, right?

  106. rebecca
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    i dont know what it is but i actually like the series although i cant help agree with everything on this list. i especially feel that the writing is bad, upon first reading it i thought “this sounds like a twelve year old wrote it” but yet i still like the books….

  107. Orlando
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    You forgot to mention that sparkling vampires would make Bram Stoker spin in his grave like a top.

  108. Terrance
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    While the Twilight books are awful and I worry about the intelligence of anyone who enjoys them; this is probably the worst written topic on the subject.

    Sarah Rebecca actually made more grammatical errors in her list than the writer of Twilight did in the same amount of character duration in her first book.

    Furthermore Sarah’s are far worse because she appears to be on a high horse; which I’m sure is buckling under her immense wit.

    *insert eye-roll”

  109. Les
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    Haha, I love Twilight but I still have to agree with some of the stuff you wrote. It also helps me not to be angry because it was so funny!

  110. Bill Xiong
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 9:52 pm

    So sad, so true.

  111. stumbleee
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:01 pm

    I think that it is silly that you spent this much time dwelling on something that you don’t even like. 95 reasons is a bit excessive.
    Also, yes a lot of twilight fans are ridiculous 13 year old girls, but I can assure you i am older and not a “rabid fan” who thinks I have vampire powers. Please do not put all of twilight’s fans into such a terrible category. The books are good, and I enjoyed reading them. I did not see the movie and I do not think the books are the best pieces of literature out there, but I do appreciate them for what they are and I think people are too judgmental for their own good.

  112. hasty
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:01 pm

    Edward Cullen was a huffelpuff.

  113. Mary
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    Funny I feel this is based more on the movie than the book!!!!!

  114. Me
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    I agree with all the people stating that your reasoning is pathetic. Firstly, Twilight is a FICTITIOUS book; therefore, things are obviously going to be abstract and unrealistic.
    Meyer was trying to move AWAY from the idea of the conventional vampire, hence the whole no fangs thing. Having another typical vampire story would be, as you said “predictable and boring.”
    If you’re going to state that Twilight sucks, you might as well state that Harry Potter sucks, because they’re both about completely unfathomable things that little girls dream about.
    “Vampires can’t get people pregnant! SPOILER.” -I reiterate my point: it’s fictitious.

    Get over yourself.. I understand that you’re jealous of the success of this book, but next time you want to criticise the author’s writing skills, you should probably keep in mind that this is her FIRST novel, and she must be good if the book has been this successful.

  115. Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    I haven’t read Twilight. But girls who like Twilight move onto Anne Rice and then Dracula and then classic horror. Pre-pubescent girls are reading- I can’t complain. Their taste can improve with age.

  116. Anonymous
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:10 pm

    I read the first book long before the craze began. It was a decent book. It sucked me in and made me want to find out what will happen. So I read all 4 books and then realized that nothing happens. Really. Not enough action for the thousands of pages read.

    I also wholeheartedly agree that the Bella-Edward relationship should not be viewed as a model relationship. When I learned about the 12-year-old girls who love this book, I worried about what society will view as a healthy relationship in 10 years when these young girls are beginning their adult lives. Scary.

  117. Smart One
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:19 pm

    I am a guy that loves Twilight. I am not gay. I don’t like it for the whole sparkly vampire crap aspect of it. I like it for the storyline and the characters (i.e. Carlisle, Alice, Jasper).

    You have the worst reasons in the world for why Twilight sucks. Take #94 for instance….”It’s offensive to the male and female race and just the entire race as a whole.” Since when are male and female RACES? I’m pretty sure those are genders.

    Also, since when is Bella the perfect character? Bella is clumsy, plain, and extremely pale. I’ve always thought that perfect women characters were beautiful and graceful.

    You fail at life. Period.

  118. Ktay
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    Practice what you preach and get a life. How much time did you spend writing these AND reading the book? Get a job.

  119. Steph V
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    I might have missed it in the comments, but otherwise I’m surprised that many of Twilight’s flaws mentioned here in the list and in the comments are being blamed on the author. An author’s job is to write a good story, yes (and by good I mean by definition, not in one’s opinion).

    But there is so much more to the process once a writer has a book deal. Writing a book, as any author will tell you, is a collaborative effort. Which means it’s not solely the author who’s to blame if a book is less than satisfactory. As a copyeditor, it’s my job to ensure an author looks his or her best. Countless professionals read a book once a deal’s been signed. If there is anyone to blame for plot holes, grammatical errors, and poor character development, and any other inconsistencies or inaccuracies, ultimately that should be the publisher.

    Aside from the author, who’s main goal is really only to tell a marketable story, the editors, copyeditors, proofreaders, and the like — who are paid to ferret out anything that make the book and author and publisher lose credibility and who should be making suggestions to the author so he or she can produce a well-crafted story — are responsible for putting out good-quality fiction, regardless of whether it’s by Meyer or King.

    Ultimately, however, if the main objective of a publisher is the bottom line, which it is, kudos to Little, Brown for recognizing a marketable story and series when they saw one and for advertising it to obvious great effect.

    Kudos as well to Meyer for following a dream (most of all) and for creating characters and situations that, while fantastical and flawed, even sometimes irritatingly so or annoyingly limited in emotional range, yet allowed millions to relate, which is a main reason that many, including me, liked the books in spite of recognizing amateur writing. While it’s true Meyer’s writing leaves something to be desired, especially in a technical sense, she *can* and likely will get better with practice. And seeing as publishers usually demand more from a successful author, she’ll be getting lots of that. We just have to give her some room, some freedom to develop her own style and tell her own stories.

  120. Stephen
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    #89 was the best reason for me to hate Twilight.

  121. s m blomker
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    Well, Interesting list of thoughts you have for a book that has gotten so many books sold and them also turning into movies. I think everyone has a right to thier opion. I’ve read the books but I’m not going to share what I thought of them. I just wanted to say that you are allowed to share what you think, because it was published and I tthink you should have realized that you were going to get a lot of comments too.

  122. Just me...
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    Thank you so much for this! Twilight makes one realize just how sad our society has become in regards to literature. I agree with every point you made, but have one more to add:

    95.) Stephanie Meyer can’t write; therefore, there are no real climactic moments in any of the books. Every time she begins to build one, it just stops.

  123. Jamie
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:10 pm

    This is hilarious, this list has so many good points, and the comments are great as well
    I read the books and I liked them a lot, but it doesn’t mean I don’t realize that meyer sucks at writing, and that I need to bash someone who’s only pointing out the obvious as well as poking fun at the books
    I don’t understand why so many people are upset about this, if you love the books so much, why are you wasting time reading a hate list about them?

  124. whatever
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:12 pm

    I don’t care, one way or another, how anyone feels about Twilight. However, if you have the gall to call someone out on their grammatical errors you had better re-read what you type. People in glass houses should not cast stones.

  125. me
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:13 pm

    ok people. just an effing book, get over yourselves.

  126. shellybeast
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    Haha, yes, I have to admit, I fell into the Twilight obsession around September of last year. And now I totally regret it. God, I even bought a shirt. How lame was that?

    After reading this, I really am ashamed that I had fallen so in love with the series. It wasn’t… what I expected it to be when I first read it. But the hype was all around me, and I joined in with the obsession. All the fan girls were sighing about how they’ll never get their own Edward — and my best friend was telling me every single day: “This is the 15th time reading this book!” very excitedly, I may add.

    The only thing I kind of like about this book is Taylor Lautner. But not really. And he’s not even in the book. He’s in the movie.
    God, I’m retarded.

  127. Kira
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    No offense, but I have found the commentary following to be much more entertaining than the list itself. Yes, it is a list. Yes, it is some one’s opinions. It is a book. You either like it or hate it. Books were meant for enjoyment. If you don’t like it, don’t read it and forget about it. It is a popular series, but that doesn’t do anything but make people read it and buy it. I think it wrong to shove your own opinions on other people. So live and let live I say. Concentrate on other, more important things. If some one wants to bad mouth a book, let them.

  128. Laura
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    I know the books are incredibly bad, but they’re quite entertaining.

    I like Twilight, but not like a tween likes Twilight.

    They’re tweens! What do you expect? We were all delusional at 13. Also, like most fads, this too will die out. As soon as all the movies are made these tweens will be teens and will have moved on to other things.

  129. Aleasha from RI
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 11:58 pm

    I appreciate someone who is honest. Personally, I really liked the series, but I am not a “crazed teenage girl” who obsesses over the mere mention of Edward or any of the other characters. I am 26 years old and enjoy fiction stories. I loved reading your list and found most of the reasons you hate Twilight amusing. The rest I have heard before, so pardon the lack of humor on my part for them. I do have a comment on one of your reasons in particular, #77. I totally thought the same thing and if thought about more deeply by fellow Twilight readers, it is most disturbing in a real-life sense. You don’t like it, sue me. I am not dissing the series, just stating an obvious, and hysterical fact.

  130. Aeden
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 12:19 am

    Almost every single person I know is in love with the series, except me. Thanks for confirming I’m not the only one.

  131. Posted March 30, 2009 at 12:32 am

    Sorry, but I loved the movie. Have not read the books. I honestly was not interested in Twilight at all until I rented it on PPV this weekend. I thought that it would be a silly vampire teen movie. But, I was so surprised. I personally loved the fact that it wasn’t just a blood and guts vampire vs. garlic, stakes, and holy water movie. It had a plot behind the vampire aspect. It was about love from different worlds, caring more about someone else than yourself, inner struggle, choice and consequence, etc…

    Also, one of your c/o was about the sex aspect. What is wrong with taking a cult classic like vampires and making them moral. Why do you think they only feed on animals. She is creating an emotional side to the vampire character that I enjoy much better than …”oh I am going to suck your blood and make you one of my concubines.”

  132. Jane
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 12:38 am

    You’re completely entitled to your opinion, but if you REALLY hate Twilight that much, why waste your time making a list about it? Doesn’t make sense.

  133. Please... just stop
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 12:43 am

    First off, total kudos to the author of the list for making this. I’m 100% sure you knew you were going to have hateful death threats from teenage girls everywhere, but you still made it. Way to be. Secondly it was funny, and from what i’ve heard of the people raving about how incredible the book is, the list is pretty freaking accurate.

    Now that that is out of the way.

    Everybody quit freaking taking everything so freaking personally! Did you write the books? i didn’t think so. Don’t be so offended when someone doesn’t like it. You like the book, great for you, you’re allowed to think its an excellent piece of American literature if you want. BUT! and that is VITALLY important word…. but, EVERYONE CAN THINK/SAY/BASH/APPRECIATE/SLAM anything they want to. It’s called opinion, it’s called personal preference. Don’t threaten to kill someone because they don’t appreciate a book that you pray to.

    All I want to get across. Is stop being so freaking angry, its a book some people will hate it, some will love it. Why can’t everyone just respect that. Try saying what you think from a neutral standpoint instead of attacking someone for what they think.

    Twilight fans. You’re incredible, keep loving it.
    Anti-Twilight, try not to get too upset at those who love it, maybe someday they’ll learn. We can only hope.
    Long live Harry Potter ;)

  134. Echo
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 1:09 am

    I find it very interesting that you mention feminism and Martin Luther… reasons 14 and 92… in some attempt to prove your point. Great idea to pair someone who believes that women are inferior to men with the ideals of feminism! Now, lets get one thing straight… your opinions are legitimate and I understand that they are shared by many people the world over, but when you insult my intelligence (because I am, of course, a Twilight fan) you are overstepping your bounds. The next time that you decide to degrade thousands of people based on their personal preferences, try to make sure that your arguments are a bit more stable, k? Otherwise, your really only insulting yourself :)

  135. #38
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 1:30 am

    I’m so glad that I came back to read the comments left after my own. I also find it hilarious that six new comments had been posted since coming back in rereading -this thread has really taken off.

    I’m pleased that most (note MOST) of the mindless Twilight Edward-or-death! supporters have gone away and the newer posters in support of the book have included reasons not based on fallacies.

    Thank you, non-fangirl groupie ‘tards. I support your informed enjoyment of the useless yet (as I hear) captivating fluff that is this book series.

    Peace, love, and literature! :)

  136. Agnes
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 1:38 am

    I’m perturbed that there is so much passion poured into the Twilight debate when (often) those same people are apathetic about voting, conservationism, equal rights for genders, races, and sexualities, and all manner of things that actually affect their lives.

  137. Beth
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 1:46 am

    If anyone tries to compare Twilight to Harry Potter they are stupid. Harry Potter had a plot, Twilight is the ravings of a middle aged woman writing out her sexual fantasies that’ll never come true. I’m not trying to make fun of anyone for reading the series, they’re meant for entertainment but people take it too far in trying to say Stephanie Meyers has talent. That’s just not true.

  138. Tom
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 2:03 am

    I’m seeing books like this and others become popular with young people and don’t understand why it is so. First it was Harry Potter which was a good series in its own right. Not the best book or books I’ve ever read but still not bad really by any standard. What I really don’t get is why young people don’t really search for a good book. It isn’t that hard and you don’t really lose anything by looking. While I was waiting for Harry Potter series to finish I found and started reading books by a T.A. Baron who put a seemingly masterful twist on the story of Merlin and his life. I highly recommend it to any Harry Potter fan. Right now I’ve gotten into a combination of stark realism and fantasy in “The Black Company” which is about a band of free soldiers or mercenary company

  139. Anita-Fan
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 2:26 am

    You idiots Twilight is a rip of Anita Blake for little girls who don’t get real relationships. Want Vampires who are sexy and real MEN – Try a decent author. There’s hundreds out there from Christine Feehan to Laurell K Hamilton. It is creepy that this guy is hanging out for a 16 year old not even an adult. And people age of consent in Oregon AND Washington is 17 so it isn’t even legal.

    Trust me, PacNW weather isn’t constant enough that they could wander in the daylight. And Vampires are Night Creatures. Read your Stoker and Palidori for Godess’s sake

  140. David
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 2:55 am

    I think it’s good to hate things that suck. Publicly and loudly.

    It’s called quality control, and it’s a behavior exhibited by people who don’t want their world to suck.

  141. RandomStumbler
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 3:39 am

    Not a fan of the books by any means, I think the characters are without fail vapid and weak. However, I don’t really think it’s doing any kids long-term harm. I can’t seriously see any sane 30yr old women saving themselves for a vampire (although this is the internet, so who knows).
    At least they get kids reading, never a bad thing. And frankly, I’m happy it’s not sexual. To whoever said they didn’t remember Anne Rice novels having substantial sex scenes, that’s quite wrong. There are a number of them, and her books in general are highly eroticized. I read them at 13 and honestly, I’d be happier having my kids read less graphic stuff at that age. Since the book is aimed at young to mid-teens, it seems right.

  142. Posted March 30, 2009 at 4:35 am

    wow thats some hell of a good reason
    won’t be picking up that book

  143. Jb
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 7:44 am

    I liked Twilight before the hype.
    I still like it, but it is quite simple and easy to make fun of.

    It’s a good read when you don’t want to really think, or be challenged.

  144. Fernanda
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 9:16 am

    @JB you’re so right.
    And, well, Romeo and Juliet were teenagers and have fallen in love out of nothing. I don’t think this is a problem. LOL

  145. Sara
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 9:19 am

    I dont need say antything else… you say everything what I need… Twilight (or Crepusculo here) its the worse book in the world… and more.. I hear some dumb fan talk “twilight its better than Romeo and Juliet” SHUT UP!

    love it!

  146. poproxluvr
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 9:21 am

    You do make some valid points here, and I completely respect your right to post your opinion on the web (those fangirlies are just CRAZY).

    I would just like to point out that it is possible to enjoy reading Twilight without becoming a fangirl, that isn’t a black & white situation.

    That being said, I think you should give the book series credit, because they do have an escapest quality to them, its easy to get lost in the story. Also, if you wanted realistic characters/events… read non-fiction books… this is fiction, therefore, it doesn’t have to be “real,” just imaginative.

  147. Karly
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 9:45 am

    This absolutely made my day. Epic kudos.

  148. Liv
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 9:58 am

    The only reason I disagree with is the comment about Vampire Baseball. Other then that, this gave me a chuckle.

    To this comment “…That being said, I think you should give the book series credit, because they do have an escapest quality to them, its easy to get lost in the story. Also, if you wanted realistic characters/events… read non-fiction books… this is fiction, therefore, it doesn’t have to be “real,” just imaginative.”

    It’s pretty sad when you have to escape into the mind of a boring teenage girl that has no personality and her only passion is to screw an ancient vampire.

    Also, for all those who beleive that Twilight is better the Harry potter, PUHLEASE. Meyers and Rowling shouldn’t even be in the same category. Rowling wrote on napkins. It takes serious dedication to do that. Plus, she has trunks full of development on every character that people will never know about. Every single one. She even has Dean Thomas’s full bockground written down somewhere. You can’t tell me that Ms. Meyers has the full background of Mike hidden somewhere when all she focused on ever was Edward and Bella.

    I could go on forever, but I’ll spare the Twilight fans the heart attack.
    =)

  149. Jagere
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 10:24 am

    The perturbing thing I found with the Twilight ’series’ is this:

    Book One “Twilight” was tolerably written, and not a bad concept. I might finish that by saying this book on its own would have quietly served as a series without my explicit complaint.

    Unfortunately the writing grew progressively worse and more convoluted as they wore on. It would stand to a logical form of reason that they should have gotten better, however only the first book had any clear inspiration or plan at all. Simply put: New Moon, Eclipse, and Breaking Dawn felt as if they were written to cash in on the first books hype.

    As for inspired writing, read the classic John Milton book Paradise Lost. Powerfully poetic imagery, beautiful flow, and a fine manner of storytelling. Just don’t read the sequel, I can’t even remember the name, what I do remember was forcing myself to complete the book trying to understand why Milton ever allowed it to print. Anyways, that’s as far as I go.

    Yes, I am aware of my own grammatical errors. Could have been worse, I read that overblown ego trip “A Million Little Pieces” by James Frey once too. For some reason I thought he was going to choke up a volkswagon piece by piece before the end…

    Just my opinion mind you, and as for Stephen King he has a few worthy reads, but a lot of crap as well. Never take someones opinion of how terrible something is; You will never appreciate how terrifying a 350 pound woman in leather pants is until you turn and look yourself. Twilight is only a 300 pound lady in spandex ;)

  150. Snitches
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    #66 is absolutely histarical, but yet competely true

  151. Taffizah
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    dammit, this made me want to read Harry Potter again.

    BTW, awesome list. Made me chuckle. It was that horrific “can’t stop even though I want to” sort of thing that made me read all 4 books. It’s good fantasy fluff for when the estrogen spikes and you need girly crap… but other than that, it’s bad. Very bad.

  152. Jennifer521
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    I bought the movie not really that good either. Parts were drug out to much and other parts should of been aded.

  153. Paige
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    I hope you don’t mind me taking a copy of this to my creative writing class so that I might educate on how NOT to write a book.

  154. Lewis
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    Lol ‘T. Pain would totally win Bella’s heart and beat up Edward because he’s on a boat.’ you’re so right, i can’t think of a better reason then that, of apart from Chuck Norris [May he protect us] I agree a pathetic attempt at literature i personally wonder how these got published. And may i point out that Harry Potter is also crap and her writing style stinks, and Twilight is wore then that, you want a good book about Twilight? Get the Night watch by Sergie Lukvenyenko that man is a true genius

  155. Posted March 30, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    Wow! Funny! So much attention to Twilight–the author must’ve done something right–even if it wasn’t how it was written, I guess the story plot (or lack thereof…) — whatever, teens and other folks enjoyed.

    It’s not the first movie that millions love and hate and certainly won’t be the last–enuff said!

  156. LoDub
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    I couldn’t even finish the first chapter of the first book, and I rarely put down a book even if I don’t like it. This list made my week, you have no idea.
    And I hate that people compare it to Harry Potter. Harry Potter is well written and actually has a lot of depth to it. Twilight is flat and seriously boring.

  157. Posted March 30, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    We have the same experience, LoDub…I tried to read Twilight because my girlfriend was and still is very engaged to it. Out of curiousity, I tried to read it. But then, as a teacher of writing, I found the works of my students (3rd year high school students in the Philippines are only 15 years old) to be of better quality than Twilight. So, I did not even attempt to finish the first chapter. Likewise, when my girlfriend pulled me, literally, to watched the movie, I just snoozed my way out until the part where they played “the vampire baseball”

  158. liz
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 5:25 pm

    I actually liked the book, it was a fun read cause you did not have to think about … anything but i also think that your list was funny!!

  159. Jill
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    You sit here and talk bad about Twilight and the Twilight fans which means you have no life. You say that the fans can have their opinions but yet you continually tell people not to read the book. That is very childish of you in my opinion and I am a Twilight fan and I can use proper grammar and English.

  160. Molly
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    I read the whole series and I don’t plan on ever picking up the books again. I watched the movie in hopes that there might be more characterization, (at least we would know what Edward actually looked like, besides you know, wonderful) only to discover there was less. My favorite was 86.

  161. Posted March 30, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    After this I don’t will read this literature piece.

  162. QuinMonty86
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    Twilight was a horribly written series and yes I read all four of them. Had to see if they got any better. The movie, OMG, was the worst thing I have ever seen. I love vampire movies. This was not a vampire movie. I was bored to tears. I should have known, after all, I read the book.
    Loved your list.

  163. Jameslolol
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    MARRY ME.

    Twilight blows balls. These reasons made me lol.

    Honestly i could school smeyer at writing in my sleep, no lie.

  164. lobsterman
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    i dont get why people like twillight, it sucks in everyway.

  165. amanda
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    haha.

    i read the twilight series and thought it was exactly what i expected it to be. MADE FOR TEEN GIRLS.

    you dont go to a chick flick and expect it to be on the same level as a academy award winning drama.

    teen girls are also obsessed over hannah montana and zac efron. I dont see anyone ripping them apart. Because they are as corny as the audience they are intended for, teen girls.

    all of you obsessing over how bad twilight sucks are just as pathetic as all the girls that think twilight is the best book ever.

    the movie however… THAT you can bash as much as you like. i watched a bootleg version online and couldnt even make it through the whole thing.

  166. Werdbot
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    I love this list. It is all so true.

  167. Rebelluver
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    This is my theory:

    You see, Twilight isn’t well written at all. Plus, I waited all 4 books for a plot to arise, and it never did. But here’s the thing; it’s the first book anybody’s read. THAT’S why it’s so popular. Girls who have never read anything else read Twilight and fall in love with it, but what they don’t realize is that it’s not Edward they’re in love with, it’s reading. They don’t understand that there are so many books out there that are much better than Twilight, because they’ve never read them.

    I’ve read them, and they’re not that amazing.

    But the reason I tolerated them was because they were an easy read, and I think Twilight’s a pretty love story. Not because they were well-written, in any sense.

  168. Adrienne
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    wow you’re as right as crap. very entertaining, as well.

  169. Erika
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    It’s a good story, but it could have been written so much better by someone else. Even in saying that, some of your points are stupid and have no real basis. I agree that Bella has no personality in the movie, but the book does get a little deeper into her character. Either way, what is so wrong with letting teenagers just enjoy the books for what they are? At least they are reading. The books really aren’t challenging, but they can pose as a doorway to other literature in a world where reading literature is becoming scarce with young people. I applaud anyone who tries to aid in the intellectual development of the next generation, even if they don’t meet up to the standards that others hold them to.

  170. Lauren
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 9:11 pm

    Seriously, i know that wasn’t the one of the best things I’ve ever read, but get over yourself. Why would you ever waste your time to write this about how much you hate the book?

  171. Posted March 30, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    Forget what people say this was really nice and i agree with the whole thing

  172. Posted March 30, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    Everyone is free to have their own opinion; and do let anyone take that away from you. Some areas were repeat with a change of wording. I enjoyed the list.

  173. be
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    If you’re going to write 95 reasons on why you hate a book, then next time you get butthurt and write a review, make sure you actually write 95 different reasons. Repeating something over and over again makes you look ignorant. Some people like the book, and some people don’t, GET OVER IT.

  174. lks
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    all im saying to everyone is that this something funny posted on the internet, read it and move on, dont insult it or over analyze it, just do as you would if they were making fun of something on family guy

  175. bails
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 11:27 pm

    66… HAHAHAHA

  176. erschlady
    Posted March 30, 2009 at 11:36 pm

    okay, I respect your opinion on the book and all, but half of the 95 reasons you’ve so kindly listed, say the same reason over again just in a different way, and half of what you said has nothing to do with twilight at all, i mean where does T-Pain come into all of this?
    however i do agree with some of the points made above,
    but saying you shouldnt read it just because “its stupid” is rediculous. Thats YOUR opinion. There’s no facts that prove “its stupid”, and by giving this as a reason not to read the book, it just makes you look like a dumbass, and not to mention it makes you look really ignorant.

  177. Aggie
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 12:03 am

    You forgot to mention the annoying filler junk there was, like the side stuff about bella’s other friends (I guess you could call them friends?) is really pointless and boring just because no relationships ever develop between her and her normal “friends”. It’s like when you have to write a 600 word essay and only write 450 words, so you go through and change words like “can’t” to “can not” and add extra “the”’s and “it”’s.

    Oh yeah and I wish I had a dollar for every time she overused the word “grimaced”.

    But I mean I did find the books incredibly entertaining to read, I just wish it was written better, perhaps by a different writer. Some of the ideas are good. It’s a fun, very simple read- but is nowhere near being in the same league as Harry Potter. It’s too bad, the story had some potential.

  178. Rafal
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 3:43 am

    Stop saying ‘GET OVER IT’
    She is trying to make people ‘GET OVER’ TWILIGHT.

    CBF reading them all right now but I’m getting the feeling this is anti therefore it’s awesome already.

    BTW; calling people names does not make you look smart, it makes you look like a moron, Twilighters, mmkay.

  179. Meta
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 5:23 am

    Haha! YES! I’m not going to lie, I was cracking up the entire time I was reading this. Dear lord that was funny. I think I might’ve cried a little. And might need sleep. Regardless, great work!

  180. kate
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 5:33 am

    Reason number 66 made me LOL hard.

  181. Totes eh...
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 5:35 am

    i hate Twilight like balls

  182. Jess
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 5:40 am

    Yes! : )

  183. Patrick
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 5:43 am

    Yes the books are terrible. However, on your comment about Anne Rice, there is no sex at all in any of The Vampire Chronicles. That being said The Vampire Chronicles are my favorite books ever.

    Also, totally agree with you about the character names thing. She completely stole the character Laurent from Rice.

  184. Posted March 31, 2009 at 6:31 am

    I agree completely, this new teenage girl cult that Twilight has brought up is getting on my nerves.

  185. adam
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 7:18 am

    i watched the movie. for some reason there are a whole lot of college aged women who think edward is hot, so they watch the movie, and though the book was amazing.

    i wanted to puke watching the damn thing. i laughed hysterically when i saw his sparkling skin. he needs a haircut. and if he wasnt in twilight, the guy playing him would be looked at like a pale, pasty, emotionally disturbed kid on the street and most women would want to be with him. the plot was pathetic. there is only so much filler that can be used, and when there is no character development, its a waste of resources. there is absolutely nothing that calls out romance in this book. just whiny teenagers (even though one is over 100 years old) caught in a puppy love, and a cliche fetish thrown in. of course, saying this to my buddy in front of my gf almost got me crucified…

  186. David M. Brown
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 10:45 am

    If the book is so undeserving of the reviewer’s attention, why is it getting so much of the reviewer’s attention? I think the notion that Twilight is ineptly written is fabricated–it springs from resentment of the success the series has enjoyed. If one really thought the book was such dreck, one could not have gotten past page one and acquired enough knowledge of the characters and story to come up with the phoney-baloney litany of laments.

  187. Pernille K. Westby
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    The reason why Bella is portraid as full of flaws, is because the book is written from her point of view- and she has a low self esteem. And as far as Edward being too perfect goes, that’s totally wrong. He has such a low self esteem, he has lived alone for hundreds of years, he’s oldfashioned, and over-protective and stupid at times. You really don’t seem to underdstand that just because both of the characters look good, doesn’t mean that they’re not perfect. If you’re such a fan of litterature as you seem to be, you should read the books yourself, and create your own image of Twilight. I think you might be surprised. Well, no matter what there will always be more people that love Twilight than the people who hates it. I don’t have a problem with those who just doesn’t read it because they don’t think they would find it interesting, but I just think it’s embarresing that you seriously use your spare time to write a list of 95 reasons why you hate Twilight. Do something better with your time, write a book.. Maybe it will be better than Twilight (ha!).

    A few comments on the rest of the posts;

    #16 – You obviously haven’t read all of the books to say this. Bella gets a better self-esteem, she grows up a lot, she apreciates her life better. Edward also gets a better self-esteem, he learns to loosen up a little, he realises that he isn’t destroying Bellas life. Jacob grows up, and realises that he’d rather have Bella as his friend than to not have her in his life at all. And other characters also develop a lot.

    #25 The vampires in Twilight don’t have fangs. This isn’t dracula.

    #27 Ofcourse she use the word ’said’ many times in the book. Stupid.

    #31 What abour Aro, Carlile, Shioban, Laurent, Quil, Embry, Athenodora, Kachiri, Zafrini, Eleazar & Alistair? Are those names too normal aswell?

    #32 Oh, and what was the name of the vampire you knew, again?

    #39 Stephenies didn’t expect that 10 year olds would read the book when she wrote it. It’s not like she can forbid them to read it or anything.

    Btw, I love Harry Potter as well- but, sorry to say this, IT HAS FLAWS TOO!

    In the end, I’m just glad that I’m not you. And that I’d rather use 15 minutes defending something I love, rather than using 2 hours working against A BOOK that I hate. Really, if it was environmental damage or animal cruelty that you were finding 95 reasons to hate I would be aplauding – but a book. It’s embarresing. And you know it too.

    (PS: If there’s any spelling mistakes, it’s not because I’m unintelligent, it’s because english isn’t my first language.)

  188. Rebecca
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    66. T. Pain would totally win Bella’s heart and beat up Edward because he’s on a boat.

    HELL YEAH!
    haha

  189. Nikki
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    First of all, yes, I am a fan of Twilight, but not because I think it’s a great book/ series. I like the originality of it and the way she’s put in aspects and plot twists that most people wouldn’t normally associate with the vampire/ werewolf myths.

    That said, I do agree with parts of your list, but I have a couple major problems with it. Firstly, ‘breaking rules made by more esteemed authors’? The whole point of fiction is that you create your own rules. Just because Anne Rice or Bram Stoker came up with particular rules that applied to their characters, and authors since have stuck by them, doesn’t mean they *have* to be followed. There’s a reason we don’t know what a vampire exactly looks like: it doesn’t exist. So who’s to say a vampire couldn’t sparkle? Just because it’s not likely doesn’t mean Meyer can’t make up her own rules for her own books.

    And secondly? ‘Edward is hot’, ‘Bella’s clumsy’, ‘we get the point’. Let me echo your own statement. We get the point. I have no doubt that if you hadn’t repeated the same thing over and over time after time, this list probably would’ve been half the length it is.

  190. tw1st3dcory
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    it reminds me of the 95 theses’ by martin luther haha
    good job.

  191. laputamage66
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    thank you you are a god in my eyes i saw the the movie with my friends and the only part i enjoyed was when bella almost died and when they blamed her injures on a flight of stairs made my day

  192. Posted March 31, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    Without having read the novels or seen the movie as of yet, I can only say that the hype and following is getting on my nerves – not the actual story or author (yet). My oldest daughter went with friends to the movie and she says she doesn’t see what everyone is all hyped up about.

    I’ve heard that both girls AND boys get into these books. Perhaps they are easy reads? I am going to read them eventually just to find out what it’s all about.

    The review started out ok – actually interested me (especially Stephen King’s comment, I’m a fan of his) but even halfway down the list it started becoming more of a bashing than a review. Had it stayed more objective, I think it would have been a decent review, albeit a bit one-sided.

  193. Kayla
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    technically you only wrong 94 reasons why you hate it.

  194. Tiffany
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    I don’t have any plans on reading the Twilight books or watching the movie. I think it’s horrible, everyone is obsessed with it. But this is harsh.

  195. Elizabeth
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    wow get a life. if you hate the books so much why did you read them?

  196. stfu
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    stfu be quiet

  197. Bella Swan
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    OMG
    Twilight is teh bestestset book ever! get over it! ur just jealous!

  198. Danielle
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    Ohkay, well I did read the series, and I admit, I liked it at first. Well I went back to reread the first book before I saw the movie, and I picked out a lot of flaws in Meyer’s writing. A lot of these do make sense, althought the T.Pain one threw me off a bit. xD I have friends that are like number 78, and it does get incredibly irritating. I just don’t understand why people should bash someone for speaking their mind. I’m sure they wouldn’t like it if it happened to them. I thing everyone needs to just mature a little more. I enjoyed reading this list, it did make me laugh a little.

  199. Caitlin
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    I hate these books.

    And I think the worst part about them is the fact that from now on every time a new vampire book comes out girls will be like “They’re trying to copy Twilight.”

    And if you read “Vampire Diaries” (which was written long before Twilight) they are very similar. I think Meyer might have copied it a bit.

  200. Mike1229
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    I love #91!

  201. minkmuse
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    So true, i agree it was a very poorly written series, but it had a nice overall idea. Meyer set her expectations high and failed to achieve them. the series could have been great had it been written by someone else lol. Jacob was my fav tho regardless of the creepy pedo thing… eh OH! and i don’t even know where to begin with he movie i cant believe i didn’t walk out, probably since i invested time into the series i guess. who ever it is that plays Bella acts about as good as Meyer writes… so theres my two bits

  202. EmilyHHHH
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 11:03 pm

    Add some reasons for why we hate the movie just as much:

    1. 6 montages in an hour and a half long movie is a few too many.
    2. In the scene in the forest their conversation goes along these lines:
    “I want to kill you.”
    “I love you.”
    “I dream about drinking your blood.”
    “You’re perfect.”
    “I’m sparkly.”
    “You’re beautiful.”
    “I’m imagining breaking your neck right now.”
    “It no matter.”
    3. Kristen Stewart literally says “It no matter.”
    4. The 8 minute scene in the hospital where Kristen Stewart hyperventilates and shouts out random sentence fragments over the prospect of her hot, seemingly mentally handicapped boyfriend leaving her.
    5. The line “Hold on tight, Spidermonkey.”
    6. The fact that other than Robert Pattinson, every other actor playing a vampire was somewhere between ugly and hideous.
    7. It was the same as the book.
    8. Jacob’s hairstyle.
    9. Everything else.

  203. Posted March 31, 2009 at 11:20 pm

    I agree with you 100%. I was beginning to think I am the only person on the planet who is not spellbound by this series. I am reading through the third book right now, simply because when I start something, I am determined to finish, but all I can see is a co-dependent relationship, an incredibly possessive vampire, who would not be considered wonderful in real life. Edward would be scary, because it seems at any second he is going to explode with anger. The other thing is the fluff that is added into the book. The fact that he wants Bella to marry him first. What teenage girl would agree to marriage these days? Not many. It is like a school girl fantasy. The never ending love story, with all the things girls are supposed to want, but created far too over the top to be at all enjoyable.

  204. Steph89
    Posted March 31, 2009 at 11:57 pm

    hahahaha that was great… i love the twilight series but i can admit that was awesome… people that defend it that hardcore are nuts…

  205. Posted April 1, 2009 at 12:28 am

    Hi there Sarah Rebecca, interesting write-up. There’s a lot of anger and indignation in here.

    You know what, there’s just one last thing you need to do.

    Write your own novel.

    If you don’t get any harsh criticisms (like the one you just wrote), then I’ll be convinced you’re a better writer than Twilight’s author. :-)

    Have fun. :-)

    P.S: And oh, as you write this, the Twilight author is earning money left and right…while in contrast, this article is making quite a few cents (with thousands of page views of course).

  206. Quincy
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 2:12 am

    I never watched it because I hate both Stephanie Meyers’ first and last names, and I think the girl on the front looks ugly and sick, and pathetic, and oh-so-dark, and Edwuard looks like a gay in a Phantom of the Opera mask. Also, I saw an interview with Stephanie, and she totally looks like a burnt-out palm reader.

    Oh, and a human falling in love with a vampire? Let’s get serious here, unless we gonna go out an make a comedy of it. Which is something that could be debated.

  207. David
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 2:29 am

    Heheh! At this rate I will HAVE to read the damn thing, just to see what all this fuss and hype is about and if it is really the great crime against humanity that so many people say it is. Fortunately I have better things to do – and read!

    That said though – from what you say, this seems like a continuation of the classic fantasy idea of perfection – ‘I’m perfect, I want to meet someone beautiful beyond everything’ – which dates back as far as you care to look and maybe should be accepted as a part of humanity’s dreams. Like the superhero genre (until Allan Moore took it and made it interesting by giving the characters flaws) or the James Bond arena (until it wisely realised not to take itself too seriously), only transposed to the female side. We accept the silkily perfect Bond and the boneheaded superheroes fixing the world with their fists with a certain wry acknowledgement of their silliness and appreciation of the spot that they do touch on in our souls. So why should this Twilight be any different? Why should this fantasy world of young girls suddenly become a feminist issue? It is somewhat dumb to dream wistfully of being as suave and all-purpose as a Bond or as powerful and free as a caped crusader. And of course it is also dumb to expect nice Edwards to turn up and look after you, just as it is dumb to expect anyone to BE this grand glamorous Edward or whatever he is. And it strikes me as somewhat uninteresting (my worst criticism for it) to set a story within that sort of an interaction so unquestioningly. But it’s all a part of fantasy life in a way, which has always been at odds with reality. And always will be. Even back to the old days when the girls would dream of their handsome princes and the boys would muse happily about the graceful woodman’s daughters etc. And Twilight and all the rest are only going to be symptoms of that rather than causes. If people are so lost in their fantasies as to let Twilight rule their lives and lose touch with reality – if they cant tell the difference between this fantasy and the reality around them or if they can no longer accept the reality because of it – then they are probably lost anyway and doomed to unhappiness even without Twilight to help them along the road!

    That said – it really doesn’t sound the most interesting book ever written! You want vampires, you want to look in stranger territories! Try Lucius Shepard’s ‘The Golden’ for a really unusual and interesting vampire novel.

  208. Jemma
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 5:43 am

    Ok this kind of irritates me. Sure, all the people completely obsessed with this book who treat is like a bible annoy me too…doesn’t mean I deliberately slam the book just to spite them. I found the books quite entertaining, and I think you missed most of the point – it is a LOVE STORY. It is CLICHE. It is ROMANTIC. And yes – people sparkle. And as for all your comments on how they aren’t very good vampires, seriously how cliche is that if you are searching for all the cliche reasons that makes a make up creature exactly the same in every god damn story. By the way, many of your comments contradict each other. First you complain about the ‘lack of sex’. Then you complain about ‘drug references’ cause the audience is too young. Seriously. I’m pretty sure sex is worse then a few drug references. The point Meyer is trying to bring across is that love is possible despite all odds – which for the audience attended, is a quite normal moral in most tween books. If you like a story, feel free to tell us how great it is. If you don’t like it, no one really cares. If somebody wants to read these books, I doubt that your one bad post is going to outweigh the millions of positive ones out there. Oh, and isn’t good literature SUPPOSED to be about being different, and NOT following all the ’so called rules of writing’ you speak of? There are no rules of writing. That’s the same as saying there is a limit to imagination.

  209. Sarah
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 6:09 am

    lmfao. This is brilliant. Thank you.

  210. L
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 9:45 am

    Well if you don’t like twilight, fine.

    You don’t need to list down 95 reasons, coz it’s kinda unreasonable…

    Some reasons lack “reason”, get it?

    Why don’t you just feed your own imagination?

  211. jessica
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 9:49 am

    you need to get a life! dont you have anything better to do besides make fun of twilight? i love the books and im planning on watching the movie this summer! i am defending steffany meyer because shes a great writer how would you like it if you worked really hard on something and then people took some time and hated on it like this its just wrong i wish you would just let it go and move on with your lives why dont you go pick on Harry Potter for crying out loud its pretty much the same as twilight

  212. IAMDUMB
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 9:57 am

    This is a pretty cool list. Does get kinda repetitive though which is funny because you say the book is repetitive. But, i like it. It’s funny, has alot of good points. I agree with the whole cult aspect and how ridiculous people can be about these books but come on. The fact that you dedicated so much time to writing this is a win for all twilight fans. You took “x” amount of time not only reading the book, but writing this and asking random people about it when you could have actually enjoyed reading a good book or four. So it’s kinda dumb. Funny that you get actual threats over this though. Makes me laugh. But if people wouldn’t sit around all day writing things like this and wasting there time twilight would probably be forgotten by now. But since it’s not, enjoy this article. It’s fun.

  213. Jetsu1337
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 10:47 am

    Author, you’re an idiot. I will agree that Twilight is severely over-hyped, and that some things within the writing itself are annoying, and that the movie should NEVER have existed, but a lot also makes sense within the context of the books. If you’re going to say you have “95″ reasons that the books are bad, please actually have 95 reasons. This list was a bigger waste of time than the books.

    P.S. I’m a male Twilight fan who is capable of spelling and punctuating my sentences correctly. Gasp.

  214. Elizabeth
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    You’re taking a love story way too seriously.

  215. Amethyst_Jade
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    While I can agree with some of the points made in this list, I must say that it is rather repetitive and unnecessarily long. You criticize Stephanie Meyer’s writing style, but I don’t really see a difference between hers and yours. To be honest, at least she kept my attention for more than 30 seconds.

    I must agree with Jetsu1337 that you should actually have 95 “reasons Twilight is bad” if you’re going to post that statement.

    Also, please remember that this story was written for the entertainment of mid-to-late teens. It was never meant to be a great novel of literary genius.

    You can reach me at amethyst_jade@live.com

  216. Posted April 1, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    you, have no right bashing on the people, this book or this author.

    Stephenie Meyer has put her heart and soul on this book. That something you could never do. All you did was waste time on writing the sack of grabbage.

    Look around you, twilight is biggest thing every. I was not much of a readder untill I got to this book. Twilight is the first book I could say that I enjoyed everything about. Stephenie Meyer took a new idea about vampires than the traditional stories about vampires. IT called beening creatative. Something that you don’t know about. IF you think you could better then, try it. IF you can’t the shove off. You might be the type of person that sits in a chair all day eating chips with grease in them. I don’t feel sorry for you. you have no life. We all hate you!

  217. cassie
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    I think twilight is good. Afterall, it is a love story. Lovestories have alot of talking in it. Anyways, the talking is interesting.

  218. Julia
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Funny for the most part, but there is one thing I have issues with- Anne Rice’s vampires being manly? Sure, they don’t sparkle, but other than that…yeah.

  219. mz.brar
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    Do you mind if I put this on my xanga page it’s to funny to pass up.(I’ll credit you)

  220. Nessa
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    People need to understand that the more popular a work of literature is, the more it will be critiqued. This book was not as well-written as much as it appealed to our emotions. Most Twilight lovers don’t know a good book. They just know what an easy-read is. Like, real good books are truly genius. Though, there is nothing wrong with liking Twilight, I must say you have bad taste. There is nothing wrong with having a negative opinion. Take constructive criticism and don’t act like you have the right to defend the work as if you were the one who wrote it personally.

    HOWEVER, other than comedic appeal, not all these reasons were VALID on why we should hate Twilight. If you put, 95 things you noticed that were off thats one thing. But telling someone to hate something that someone else may actually like is overboard. Though your humor was catchy. I just think being obsessed about this book because you are bored with your life and looking for a happily ever after that will never happen, realistically speaking, is overrated. Like seriously: GROW UP

  221. Chloe
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    People. Y-O-U apostrophe R-E means you are. Y-O-U-R means your, used when talking about possessions.
    Aside from that, the whole vampire concept has been stretched so far and so thin, that there are no original ideas about them left. All vampire books are roughly the same. I liked your list, it was silly, and cynical. Bella is a horrible character giving a bad name to strong girls everywhere who pride themselves on grace and independence. Meyer has written a story that basically says “Hey girls, find a man that will make your decisions for you and make all your dreams come true. And if he takes the engine out of your car so you can’t leave him, well, that means he loves you!”
    It is the essence of retarded. End of story.

  222. Speed Limit
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 7:33 pm

    Bravo! Very rarely do I read an article which goes against the popular public opinion. Keep up the good work no matter what people thihk or say. Only your own opinion counts when you write.

  223. Mordre
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    I personally love the fact you, while having some valid points ruined a perfectly good paper by overstating yourself. I got bored by point forty, at least twilight managed to keep my intrest till the end of book one. I have not, however, been able to read book two, instead have moved onto the House of Night series, which gives a far more interesting look at teenage vampires… with much more realistic scenes for teens of THIS era. I suggest it to all those who decided to flame twilight. It would be an interesting book, if the characters had been handled differently.

  224. Posted April 1, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    i would rather read this than the book

  225. Jenny
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    Get over it. Its fun as hell to read and why does it matter to you what other people enjoy? Instead of sitting and thinking of 95 reasons why you hate a book of sub-par literature, read one of your Pulitzer’s prize winners, snob. You should get started on your 95 reasons why you hate the Jonas Brothers, people are probably enjoying them way too much for your liking.

  226. rai sinbran
    Posted April 1, 2009 at 10:32 pm

    ummm….i totally like the series but i get it doesn’t make alot of sense, i read it because it is funny. and i agree with you on a lot of those points. however you are a hypocrite. because you say that twilight fans force their beliefs on you but your doing the same damn thing. as for grammar its the internet no one gives a damn but you and your anal cavity. so get your head out of your butt and and get over it. no offense asshat.
    p.s. # 29 you can suck it harry potter is amazing.

  227. Dani
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 1:13 am

    Really, you’re saying that Twilight fans are dumb and obsessive and teenage girls, or that’s what I gathered. I know that they are obsessive, but you seem obsessed with it too, or obsessed with hating it. I personally know some people who love Twilight, and many of them are smart. Dissing someone’s intelligence for liking a book that gives them an escape into another world is a bit harsh. As for it being a teenage girl’s book, I know adults who love the book and I know straight guys who love the books. I love reading the Twilight books. If you don’t like them then don’t read them. Don’t dis people because they like the books because I’m sure that there are books you are obsessed with because you can relate to them or because they take you to another world. If you don’t get what I’m saying then you’re not as smart as you think you are.

  228. Posted April 2, 2009 at 1:51 am

    The reasons in this article were so absurd to me, that I had to publish a rebuttal to this article.

    http://www.bookstove.com/Fantasy/Why-to-Hate-Twilight-Rebuttal.621697

  229. Posted April 2, 2009 at 2:20 am

    haha i totally agree with you and LOL’D the whole time i wuz reading. number 65 wuz my favorite.

  230. Mcgrimus
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 7:10 am

    Only one reason is needed: terrible writing.

  231. Sumner Eves
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 9:36 am

    Ok…..Right now I hate StumbleUpon…..Because they only have an “I Like It” button….not an “I LOVE it” button.
    This list was awesome.

  232. Joseph
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:08 am

    It angers me more than anything that these fangirls say that Twilight is the best book ever, even though it is truly a piece of trash. I would recommend The Lord of the Rings, although people tend to say “I saw that movie, it was boring.” …………. Okay, but I recommended the BOOK, idiot. Gah, I’d better stop or I’ll go into a long rant.

  233. Kathleen
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:18 am

    not read it and have no plans to. anything that Wal-Mart gets a display with t-shirts, book bags, posters etc is crap. It is drivil like harliquin romance novels but worse. Little girls with no brains enjoy it.

  234. Kayla
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:54 am

    “T. Pain would totally win Bella’s heart and beat up Edward because he’s on a boat.”

    That’s win right there. Really, what more reason do you need?

  235. nana
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:55 am

    yes,everybody likes edward but he is a vampire?♥

  236. Ben
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 11:20 am

    So, I agree whole-heartedly that everything having to do with the Twilight Series is a great big pile of horse crap, but you are making everybody with that opinion look like a complete retard. The fact that only one book in the “Twilight Series” is called Twilight means nothing. In t “Hitchhikers Trilogy”, which is one of the greatest series ever written, only one of the books has the word Hitchhiker in it and there are FIVE books, not three. It doesn’t matter. Also, you say that the books are unoriginal (a statement with which I completely agree) yet you point out that shiny vampires (one of the only original things about the books) is a flaw. Think about what you say next time before you make yourself and all those who share your opinions look like morons.
    “Its better to keep one’s mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.” – Abraham Lincoln. Think about that.

  237. apruiz09
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 11:58 am

    I liked the Twilight Series. It may have been childish but it is written for teens and you. You can’t seem to get over the fact that Bella is so perfect but it sounds more like you are jealous of Bella and maybe the fact that she’s not alone. Have you ever fallen in love? Not just puppy love but true love? Maybe that’s why you are so bitter toward the story.

    If you think it is so terrible, why don’t you write a book and see how far you can go with it? Let the readers decide if you are right or wrong. That would be the best way to take out your frustrations about the Twilight Series.

    Like you said everyone is entitled to their own opinion and I think some of your reasonings have some ground but they are few and very far between. Especially with you repeating a lot of them. So technically you don’t have 90 (whatever) reasons you actually have fewer. I don’t think it is right that you use a dead persons name to knock what you don’t like. You don’t know if they would have liked it or not. You are not them and you don’t have their mind. So next time keep the references of other people who could not have possibly told their opinions out of it.
    apruiz09

  238. Patrick
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    Would everyone get off this chicks case. Yes she repeated herself. So what, she was entitled to her opinion. Quit calling her stupid. So what she didn’t like the books. Neither did I. But even if I had, you wouldn’t see me yelling about the fact that someone had a different opinion than mine.

    I will point out a huge flaw in these criticisms. Saying that Anne Rice’s vampire’s aren’t “girly men” is a little wrong. Most of the male vampires have homosexual tendencies. Also, Anne Rice has more than male vampires in her books. By the way, I love Anne Rice. She is the greatest vampire author of all time.

  239. Hardline
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    #66
    that is the most important one.

  240. Mas
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    I just want to say that Reason #15 isn’t a good reason.
    Everyone’s parents are different.
    Some parents don’t bother their kids, some always hover.

  241. James Strickland III
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    Lovely Story. Unique angle. Surprising structure. Very well-written and marks way up there in creativity.

  242. Becky
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    I loved your list and am so jealous, mainly bc I didn’t write it myself. I was particularly entranced with 77, as I thought the same thing….http://beckstaspage.blogspot.com/2009/03/old-man.html

  243. Brooke
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    Okay, first off… you say Twilight readers are stupid and mindless. Well? Look at you!? Who has time to write 95 resons on why to hate a much loved book. I mean it isn’t our faults you are to blinded and stupid to not understand the true point of the book and enjoy it as much is everyone else. Plus, these aren’t really even 95 reasons, they say the same thing over and over! Bella isn’t a stupid person without a brain. She ws actually very smart, and she did love Edward, very much. Yes, reason 15 is stupid parents don’t always hover, they have trust. Charlie is very protective of Bella if you actually read the book you will come to learn that. Jacob was very nice, but Bella can’t help she doesn’t love him the way she loves Edward. Plus, Jacob is completely in love with Rennesme, which in my opinion is a creative and beauitful name. The book isn’t even about sex, what person would say it’s not even a rea book because it doesn’t have enought real sex? So, just get over yourself. The books are anazing, you are self centered and heartless. I’ll pray for you and keep your opinions to yourself, cause they are bad ones.

  244. Anna
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    I myself am a huge Twilight fan, but i have to admit when you break down the books like that, it’s true. but the reason why most people like the books is becuase is impossible. when you read it its just like daydreaming. the perfect guy, willing to die for you, blah blah blah. its an escape from reality. thats why most people like it. at least that’s why i like the books.

  245. Grace
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    hahahahahaha i read all four books over my thanksgiving break. Basically four books in four days. I’m a huge fan of Harry Potter and that is REAL fantasy writing. This list was so true and hilarious! Fantastic.

  246. Julian
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    My girlfriend keeps trying to get me to read at least the first book before i criticize it. I was considering it until I heard the vampires sparkle :P i was like um wtf? then they apparently have no heart beat = no blood flow = no cellular respiration = no movement = dead = not able to do anything.

    The plot has clearly been taken from a million other books and btw literature is considered to be novels such as Milan Kundera, Charles Dickens, Shakespeare, Kurt Vonnegut, George Orwell. Literature is supposed to be a metaphor, microcosm, analogy, well written, like these books are, not cliche ;)

    Also, quite hilarious to see these 13 year old girls going crazy over a 109 year old virgin, who is in a teenager’s body. I know plenty of girls, one who reads daily, who threw the books away because of the “lack of substance, the crappy writing” etc.

  247. Madelyn
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    Honestly- it’s just a book. Personally, I didn’t think it was that great, but I’ve read much worse. I just read the series from all the hype, said, ‘Hmm. This is ok,” and then didn’t touch them again. I’m neither obsessively addicted to them, nor obsessively hateful either. It’s a story- I think both groups- the ones who hate them and the ones who love them- just need to move on and get over it.

  248. Amy
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    Worst piece of writing to have ever been published. It’s entirely immature and ridiculous. Awful, awful, awful. Stephenie Meyer should just burn all of her books and never write again. I read about half of book one. I simply couldn’t stomach any more of that crap.

  249. natalie
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    I read the entire series just because once I start something, I have to see how it ends. It was an extremely guilty pleasure. Everything I hated about the books is on this list. Kudos times a million.

  250. I
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    You are sooo WRONG!
    Twilight is amazing.
    If you have read it, your opinion is yours.
    But everyone I know who has read it LOVE IT.
    The movie wasn’t so great,
    but don’t judge a book by a movie.
    Most your comments are from losers you haven’t reads the book,
    so lay down and be amazed.
    Bell isn’t perfect, because she IS clumsy.
    And she isn’t even beautiful.
    So you have issues.
    Go to a therapist.
    Byyyatchh.

  251. Tyler
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    I think your all idiots for even talking about the book in the first place…if you think its so bad, just leave it alone and let all the little crazy girls go emo and slash themselves when they realize that edward will never come…that way u dont have to deal with all the girls in the first place :D

  252. Blondiezz
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    Jealous much?

  253. Vanessa
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    Amen to you and those who helped you write this. I will say that I have not wasted my time reading this book and I will tell you why… I have a sister who just turned 18 and she was all over these books. Now she is a cool high school drop out that is too cool too read. Anything a teenage girl is going to fall over heels for is not going to be a good book. I would rather spent my time reading something intelligent and yes not something where someone gets knocked up because of a vampire. Vampires are dead… they do not make sperm anymore. dead = no sperm = impossible to get someone pregnant . WOW the math is outrageous! I have to agree that Anne Rice wrote great vampire books.
    GIRLS READ SOMETHING THAT WILL EXPAND YOUR MIND AND NOT TAKE US BACK TO 1950. You don’t need a man to protect you or make your life easier.

  254. dive
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    it sounds like each of those reasons could also be used to say why twilight is good…

  255. ccube921
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    95 reasons. Overboard. Two sentences is just fine. It was a plotless book, full of impossibilities, about 2 (semi) perfect lovers. If that’s what you want to read, be my guest (It is a good waste of time if you have nothing better to do, like in the Dr. office.

  256. winelips
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 6:38 pm

    i agree with every complaint.
    doesn’t mean i didn’t read them all and enjoy them.

    the books were like candy. no redeeming value whatsoever, but still delicious.
    ;-)

  257. ccube921
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    P.S. I’m not anti-twilight, read what you want, all I’m saying is that if you want to live a book (Figure of speech, Duh) this is not the one I would spend my time on. Like I said, it is a great waste of time, but, nothing to marvel at. If you want to truly read a book, try Jeffrey Archer, John Grisham, David Baldacci, when you finish one of their books, you can laugh at the genius of the plot, every word implying something else.

    @vanessa
    If Vampires are dead and don’t make sperm anymore, they should have cuts in every part of their body. As you said, they are dead, so they obviously can’t produce new skin cells. So what is the huge myth that vampires (Together with practically every other undead type creature) heal nearly instantaneously. As you said, impossible.

    Another question on this outrageous math.

    Vampires are undead creatures, through the same logic that you said, they’re dead, so they don’t produce sperm, you can say “Well, they’re dead so they shouldn’t be walking around, or moaning, or biting people.” Obviously, they’re undead (emphasis on un) they are neither dead, nor alive. Plus, they’re mythical creatures, MYTHICAL CREATURES! You don’t apply rules to mythical creatures.

    P.P.S. I try to punctuate correctly, sorry for the unclosed parentheses in the previous post.

  258. Emma
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 7:26 pm

    I do agree with a lot of what you said…though you could have been a little more creative with the book bashing. Stephanie Meyer is not that bad of an author, and as far as her meandering away from the ‘typical’ vampire novel, bravo. People get tired of reading about the same bloody, human killing, vampires. Not all vampire books have to have smut in them. Bella is a total klutz but Meyer wanted her to be a typical, awkward teenager, though I do not know many that trip or stumble every 5 seconds.

    It did get a little boring during the second book, and it is a little ridiculous that they fell for each other so quick…although I do not know many girls who would not mind if Edward Cullen caught them…but it is a little unnerving how Bella was not terrified every second with him…and creepy that he knocks her out every time they have sex and she seems to be fine with that.

    They are decent books and I am just glad that people are reading instead of gaming or something, lol. It kind of makes me happy that not EVERYONE likes them, it keeps conversations spicy, lol.

  259. Sean
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    Speaking of “esteemed” authors, Steven King COMPLETELY disses Meyer and pretty much says that Rowling is like 10,000 times better.

  260. SnowBoy
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    U R AWSOME I HATE TWILIGHT!!!!!!!!
    lol im sending it to all my friends!

  261. Frankenstine
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 7:51 pm

    I just love it when people rant and rant about grammatical errors whilst making their own. It’s always cringetastic! Most of your reasons were redundant and irrelevant- but, kudos on the Light Yagami & Potter references, it ALMOST make you likeable. And the fact that you say “we” within your list makes it a bigger disaster- apparently multiple heads aren’t always better than one.

  262. Sosano
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    I actually liked the books, (Im a man by the way) and it is kind of stupid and everything. BUT, Harry Potter is a wussy, he sucks at magic on almost all the books.

  263. Roxannee
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    LMFAO to the “Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.”.

    Twilight is useless, as are rants. :D

  264. Shockeye
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    Haven’t read it or seen it, and don’t plan to. If the teenyboppers love, I’m sure to hate it. (Except for Harry Potter :) )

    Want to read a real vampire story? Check out Anne Rice’s books or Stephen King’s Salem’s Lot.

  265. MJ
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 8:34 pm

    I have to laugh. I’d never even heard of this book series until last night when my daughter called me to tell me to read them as they were the worst thing she’d ever read and were being compared to good literature. She was both appalled and frightened for what it portends for young readers. I STILL haven’t read them but was clicking the stumble button and found this and thought it has to be the same one she was telling me about. Someone direct children to the My Book House set of books for such glorious reading starts.

  266. Josh
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    I like this guy. He is write as hell.

  267. kenz
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    personally i have not read the books nor do i care to, but i’ts my opinion that for someone so intent on not liking the book you sure to give it a lot of attention. secondly, get over yourself. obviously for all your bashing on the author’s creativity you don’t have a lot of your own, you repeated yourself several times, taking the same concept and rewording it.

    no, id didn’t think it was worth my time, but if you kept reading it you must of thought it was worth yours. you know what they say -
    those without talent become critics.

    cheers to tyler

  268. Shaun
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    “We read the entire series just to laugh at the stupidity of it.”

    you just helped the popularity by reading the books and making this list.

    I’m neither a fan or a hater. I’ve only seen the movie… If you really want to get rid of Twilight never mention it again and hope it goes away. lol. right now you are just being counterproductive. My guess is you are one of those people that loved it when it first came out and once it got popular you turned your back on it.

  269. Vanessa
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    Are you sure you read the Saga? Because most of your reasons aren’t true. Meyers DOES mention fangs. Bella never listens to Edward especially about Jacob. In fact she stands her ground so much that Edward changes his opinion and lets her see Jacob. Twilight is a fictional book and if you ever took a literature class, when writing a fictional book, you have to think about your audience and what they want to read. Which Meyer does exactly right. Also whose to say that vampires have fangs and have to have flaws… they don’t exist!!!! At first your list was full of reasons and then it just turned into a list of your nonsense. Also, did you forget that teenagers DO fall in love that quickly and that exactly what Bella and Edward are. Teenagers grasp to the thought that “they never felt this way about someone” and automatically assume its love. So that is very typical of them to feel the way they do. People like twilight! Get over it. Stephanie Meyers got all the fame she deserved for these books. As for your other reasons I don’t have time to waste correcting you on everything you have no idea about. Oh, and I know plenty of straight guys who like twilight. Maybe because I like it. Sorry if you will never experience that.

  270. Anonymous
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 9:04 pm

    “It obviously appeals to young girls, and I don’t see why people are so keen to crush them by telling them that’s it’s a horrible book and a waste of time.”

    Maybe because it’s crap like this that’s teaching our girls to be submissive and totally dependent on men? Not only does Bella’s entire life revolve around Edward, Edward is also an abusive creep. All this book does is encourage submission and domestic violence.

  271. JC
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    This list was awesome!

    I would add one extra thing (and sorry if anyone mentioned it): The best marketing quote they could find from the book was “I dream of being with you forever.” Really? That’s the BEST LINE in the whole book?

  272. Posted April 2, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    “A hundred years difference = pedophile.”
    Made me laugh SO hard!

  273. Jordan
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    Be comforted by the fact that there is a small sect of twilight fangirls who do recognize that it is horrendous writing and not in any way literature. I simply do not always want to read “literature.” Don’t write us all off so easily; some of us are intelligent. Twilight is to reading as toast is to making breakfast. Of course there are better things out there, but you don’t always want to expel the effort, and it fulfills its purpose.

  274. DraculaIsARealVampire
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    #95 Edward either has blue balls or herpes…. he’s been around for a LONG time…. something had to have happened there.

  275. Jesh
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 9:48 pm

    Y’know… I’d be almost disappointed if this post had perfect grammar. It’s a blog post. A brain drain. It’s just kinda there. Doubtful that it was about getting attention.

    For years I was a professional editor and there’s a time and place to exercise my talents. Right now? Not one of them. Blog post? Nah. A SET OF NOVELS? Hell yes.

    The comments have made my evening. People have actually been suggesting you see a THERAPIST or that you had recently been broken up with and that’s why you’re so bitter? Oh man I love the internet.

  276. Kelli
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:05 pm

    I’m not going to lie, I’m a “fangirl” for Harry Potter, but as this list proves, HP is significantly better than everything else in the world, I mean, Twilight.

  277. Kelli
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    oh and lol at comment #302. Way to prove the lists point.

  278. Jassie
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:11 pm

    Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.

    That’s the only reason you need.

    Hail Kira.

    Plus she’s pretty much having sex with a dead guy.

    o.o

    Excellent list.

  279. Zillah1066
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:13 pm

    Oh man. You’re my hero!

    You make me so happy it’s rediculous!

    Honestly am I the onlyy girl offended by the weak disgusting portrayal of Bella. Gross. Really.

  280. Jenn
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:22 pm

    You’re entitled to your opinion, but you may want to check your spelling and punctuation before posting something, especially before you criticize the spelling and punctuation of others.

  281. carol anne
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:26 pm

    The world population will come to an end because all girls who read this book will think they are Bella and will wait for their Edward to come until they are old. And he’ll never come.

    … I’m a girl
    … I read the book
    … I hated it.

    So, thanks for saying that.

  282. Ian
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    I wish these brainwashed Twilight fans could grasp their mind around some truly magnificent literature. Maybe London, Joyce, or Hemingway will become the next fad, but I sincerely doubt it.

  283. John
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 11:37 pm

    This book was deplorable and the series went down hill from there. Conflict creates interest and Meyer left it out completely, I am an English teacher and in my opinion the entire series is worth less than an old paperback sleaze novel.

  284. Jimmy
    Posted April 2, 2009 at 11:48 pm

    Ok 1) I hate the books 2) if you liked the books i feel sorry for you, but more power to ya, who am i to judge… 3) this list was CLEARLY put up as a joke, I mean I have no doubt that the author dislikes the series, but read the list… clearly a joke.

    I will say this, however, #89 makes it all worth while…
    “Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.”

    If you don’t get it go watch death note… literally laughed out loud when I read that one

  285. No Name
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 12:40 am

    So the books and the movie weren’t that great but these reasons kind of sucked too, esp. because they kept repeating over and over how much Bella sucks, I got the point after reading the first 3 reasons. Nevertheless, the whole vampires sparkle comment was a good one.

  286. SpiderMan
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 1:02 am

    Wow, does this really make people feel better about themselves? Finding something to bash? Agreed that you do have your opinion I think you might have gone a tad over board on some of your points. Yes the typical vampire doesn’t sparkle, but why should the author be contained by the constraints set forth by previous authors? The amendments change, so why can’t a FICTIONAL book as well. I liked the series but like some wish there was a bit more to them. The Harry Potter series in my eyes had more connections that made reading the series worthwhile, while this series was basic and easy to guess each next step. Anywho, people need to stop freaking out when someone has a contrasting opinion, and those with the contrasting opinion need to lighten up and get out our your own little ‘perfect’ box as you see it.

  287. Amused
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 1:07 am

    Just to put this obvious and well-known fact out there: your NOT EQUAL to you’re.

    So, from my own observations, it’s rather amusing to see people be haughty about grammatical correctness. OOH are you judging me too? Because obviously, there is an inverse relationship between my grammatical prowess and the quality and content of my thought processes.

    Also, it is rather amusing to peruse this and read such vehement responses! Take into account that really, of all the pertinent issues in the world to take a passionate stance about, this is one of the most trivial out there.

    But rock on everyone, rock on- do whatever you have to to validate your existence.

  288. bitehardxx
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 1:27 am

    LOL @ #66

  289. Alex
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 1:32 am

    I liked the book, but only because I have a vagina and I’m a hopeless romantic.

    I giggled the whole way through your list.
    Cheers!

  290. Juliet
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 2:21 am

    I’ve taken baths deeper than you.

    If you had actually read the book and looked at the inner meaning you would have seen you are entirely WRONG on everything here. I went through each of your reasons and thought of a rebuttal to each. You are just pissed that there is a huge following of the books. I did not like the movie. I believe the director sucks and did not give the book justice. Maybe you should find something you are good at or some better way to spend your day then tear down works others took more time on than you ever will on something.

  291. wow your have no time on your hands to think of real reasons
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 2:31 am

    wow! geez if you hate twilight so much, why do you care so much to spend your time writting a list about it.. plus everybody has a different view of how they see vampires.. second vampires and werewolfs have a history its not just a facebook ap! third which if you actually read the books bella didnt try to kill herself, idk where you got that one from… There are better books out there… and there is a actually plot.. maybe you dont see it cause your to close minded… and if you think harry potter is better for little kids to read…ya lets have our kids think they can fly on a broom stick or that they have powers. and go and fight evil snakes and gaint spiders. with moving stair cases… the movies are kool but the books are boring… people have different interest so why bash on a book you didnt take the time to enjoy… for all those who said i just read the book to see what idiot dies first or if bella gets over edward.. i think your just making an excuse to cover up that you exactly did enjoy the books and you couldnt put them down cuz if you hate them so much why would you spend days read like 7 hundred page books..??? i dont see it after the first book wouldnt you think if you didnt like it you wouldnt go rent or buy the second and the third and fourth…??? i think your just trying to fit in and say you dont like twilight cuz your too embarsed to admit it.. 95 reason not to like twilight? i’d say alot of these reason dont make sense and that most of them are stupid and repeated… and if you know anything about writting books. a lot of books are based off the author’s life and what they wish they can be or a situtation they have been in so back off her… most others write about their fantasies…

  292. wsfsd
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 2:45 am

    Light Yagami doesn’t approve?

    Wow, that really just pulled ANYTHING validation this list had against the book.

    Having a comment from a fan from an EQUALLY obnoxious and useless fanbase? GG.

  293. Posted April 3, 2009 at 3:52 am

    The list is quite hilarious, I presume a lot of it is in jest but the tone is quite venomous so I guess you really don’t like Twilight…you’recertainly getting a lot of recation anyway, so well done for that.
    I have to say, I read all of the books recently and while they are not particularly well written, and books 2 and 3 should really be combined because it’s the same story stretched out to a ridiculous length, I have to say Catherine Hardwicke did a fantastic job with the film adaptation, which I found much more enjoyable than the books. Check it out at http://www.cinemaroll.com/Horror/Twilight-Strangely-Captivating.462577
    Here’s to the Internet, were EVERYONE is entitled to their opinion :)

  294. ha
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 3:55 am

    the only reason guys hate this book is because they know they could never be as perfect as edward. or robert pattinson

  295. I Hate Twilight
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 5:15 am

    This list makes me want to make sweet sexy non-Mormon vampire love to you. Twilight is just as bad as those bodice rippers you can buy at the dollar store.

  296. Posted April 3, 2009 at 7:45 am

    twilight is such a good movie for me…..everything in twilight is so great for me.Bella ,who was portray by Kristen Stewart is really good and she is such a good actress.

  297. WTF
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 7:58 am

    I agree with ha to a point, but Robert Pattinson is a messed up Edward, and all you f**kin preps reading it has pissed me of!!!

  298. Posted April 3, 2009 at 8:01 am

    nice reason for 66 because hes on a boat ;p does anyone here hate the jonas brothers? if you do go to my page

  299. jassielm@gmail.com
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 9:07 am

    Hmm. I was wondering if you would mind if I linked to this on my blog, for pure amusement. It is an excellent list and I would love to share it with people I know.

    Hope you write more like this.

    Personally I haven’t read Twilight (except the last Chapter of the last book, just to ruin it for an obsessed friend =)) and due to all the hype I probably won’t. I have too many Twilight obsessed friends. I went and saw the movie due to them and got slandered for not having any idea what it was about; down to not knowing they were vampires.

    Stephen King makes a very good point.

  300. yeah
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 11:12 am

    alright, you say we’re all allowed to have an opinion but when you’re trying to force your views on others it’s annoying and unnecessary. You’re just one of those people who love harry potter and can’t like anything else. i like both series, but just like twilight, harry potter has equally ridiculous plot lines and undeveloped characters. It is a book, who care if it isn’t original? Harry Potter isn’t original either, get over it. It is about entertainment and that’s it. Since when do authors have to create creatures in the exact way others have before? what does it matter? it is a fantasy and no more, so they can be however the author wants them to be. get over yourself.

  301. rose
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 11:18 am

    are you serious? i mean really, just because a book is not feministic enough or whatever, does not mean it is not incredibly romantic. also, have you ever thought that some girls dont mind that bella is “useless” its a nice thought that someguy so comeletly perfect would come and wisk you away?? and u said that edward doesnt have flaws, then you said that he is overly protective and whatever. anyway, if u dont like the book that is fine, but dont make ppl think its so stupid and un pc. ur annoying.

  302. Sonia Grobstein
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 11:35 am

    Read the book and liked it. Why? It is a book, not real life, lets pretend etc. Sometimes it is good to be able to read a book that will take your mind off of your every day or some bad days. It is fiction and most people realize it is fiction.

  303. Amila
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    Why are you wasting your time with this?
    I read Twilight over two years ago and it was good. Not the best thing I’ve ever read, but it was enjoyable.
    I don’t understand why you’re spending time dwelling on this and building up so much hate for a BOOK. or book series.
    Really, you’re telling people that read Twilight and are in love with it to get a life. Why? Because they love Twilight? Well isn’t hate just as strong as an emotion?
    Isn’t it about time you got a life, too?
    I realize we’re all have our opinions and can say what we want, but most of your ‘reasons you shouldn’t read Twilight’ are repeated and dull, like you’re just coming up with things to fill in to make the list long.

  304. coffeejunkie79
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    I haven’t read the books but I do have a comment about:

    #37. Why is it called the Twilight Series if only one book is titled Twilight?

    A book series is a sequence of books with certain characteristics in common that are formally identified together as a group. Book series can be organized in different ways, such as written by the same author, or marketed as a group by their publisher.

    This does not mean that they all need to have the same title.

  305. Jasper
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    #95 isnt exactly a reason…i like twilight, its interesting.
    but errr who would bother to write 94 reason you hate twilight?

  306. Victoria (Death Note fan)
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 2:56 pm

    I wholeheartedly agree. Reason 89 is genius, by the way. I’m pretty sure that L doesn’t approve either.
    Anne Rice is also vastly under appreciated and sadly, I think I prefer it that way. No insane fangirls.
    I miss the days when grammar and punctuation were important and you was spelled with three letters…

  307. Posted April 3, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    Hi, Sarah, how are you?
    I see that you at least took the time to actually read the books before commenting on them! That’s good! I wrote an article on Twilight as well, and it’s important to at least have a head’s up on the facts before posting an opinion.

    I’m a guy! I’ve read the first three books of the Twilight series. I almost chose not to read the second and the third volumes because of my opinion on the first. However, I had a younger female friend who was vehement that I read the series because of how much she loved it. That’s why I decided to give Meyer a shot. Plus, I love werewolves, so I was anxious to see what happened with Jacob.

    No offense, but, I think it’s fair to say that most of your list was written in bias. While I can understand your frustration, ((I didn’t like the first book all that well either)) using the list to vent was certainly not a good idea. That is why you have received such negative comments—because of your negativity. You reap what you sow!

    Before you get upset again because of my comment, just realize one thing: I agree that Twilight could have been 10 times better. I also agree that the characters are pretty extreme and that the story could have developed more appropriately given different circumstances.

    The book was successful though, even with its apparent flaws. No matter how many people join this bandwagon, nothing can be done about the past. It was successful for as many reasons as it has flaws, so, who are we to judge?

    One question: Did Stephen King really say that, or did you just make it up? Cite your information so that we can all get the truth from it, otherwise we’ll be spreading false information. Do you really want to be the one who started a rumour? Cite your quotes from famous people, so that we have an idea that you’re being honest.

    There are so many other discussions that could be had with regards to this set of books, but none of them deserve the condemnatory remarks that have been posted. As far as civility goes, most of the people who posted here have a lot to learn.

    Thanks for sharing, and have a nice day.

    Oh, and, to explain something about book series: First-time authors rarely get a say in what a series of books could be entitled. It is mostly the well-known authors who produce series-starters that have a series title. Meyer’s publisher was most likely curious to see if the book would turn a profit first before considering signing her on for another in the same realm. Twilight came out as an exploratory novel. Because it did well in sales, her publisher most likely decided for her that the series would be called the Twilight series—which most generally happens with first-time authors and their novels: The series is named by its first book’s title. I hope that explains it. Because of the popularity of these books, one can ask for the title of the book itself and still get what one is looking for.

  308. Posted April 3, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    I agree with your reasons.

    I don’t ‘hate’ twilight; I just dislike it and the stupid girls who drool over it.

    Twilight has been in libraries as long as I could remember and until now they show some attention? Great fans they are.

    Over all, I agree with your reasons. Kudos.

  309. k
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    you’re all kinda a bunch of whiners in my opinion. we get that you don’t like the book…but i feel like this whole statement to show that you don’t like the book is really just a cover up. think about it…why would someone who hates the book so much spend so much time talking about it?? if you really hated it, i would think that you wouldn’t want to waste any of your time even thinking about it. stop complaining and go find something better to do with your life.

  310. LanceSlash
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    I haven’t read the book yet, and seriously I’m thinking that I shouldn’t read it. I was about to just when you type up “95 reasons that you hate Twilight”. Good reasoning, and others! I really shouldn’t read Twilight after all! Yah! I kind of feel a bit sorry for the blind people that like Edward… lol!

  311. Seldenta
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    xD I love twilight but i agree with this one. # A hundred years difference = pedophile.

  312. WTF
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    WTF! its an ok seres get over it U morons!!!

  313. yabadabado
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 8:45 pm

    Its a lame, slow and totally unbelievable story.

  314. karli
    Posted April 3, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    i aplaud every1 who wrote the 95 reasons clap clap =D

  315. Posted April 3, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    I have never heard of Twilight(very sheltered life)but you certainly got your point across very well. I don’t think I will even be interested in checking it out after this review! Thank you for stopping me from wasting my time. I don’t have any to waste for sure.

  316. SRK
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 12:17 am

    well, I did like the Twilight books. The movie was TERRIBLE. While I agree with many of your above statements, I feel that if one of your complaints is about Stephanie Meyers’ grammatical errors, you should probably fix the grammatical errors in your post.

  317. Nesferatu
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 1:17 am

    Twilight is horrible… what’s even worse is the fact that GROWN WOMEN read these stupid books and fall in love with Mr. Perfect uumm… i mean Edward.

    Look Twilight groupies, if you want to read a book where the character is perfect try reading the Bible…

    I hate Twilight, their fans and the so-called author.

    P.S. The movie sucked too… all I could do is stare at the HUGE Chiclettes Bella had in her mouth. (for all you slow people, her huge buck teeth! I guess we know what Bella wanted for X-mas!!)

  318. Jeff
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 3:06 am

    The only reason people think these books are good is because the people who read them are illiterate.

  319. Billie
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 9:20 am

    I am an English major and do have respect for a lot of good literature. However, I still enjoyed reading Twilight because it was simply entertaining. You’re right though about the obsessive fan girls; they’re way over the top.

  320. nonya
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 10:25 am

    gah who cares, the book is popular whether you like it or not, get over it.

  321. Kendra
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 10:42 am

    You spelled acquired wrong. Along with many other words. Also, even a person who hates the series understands that your points make no sense and your logic is horribly flawed. There would be no point in marking you on how wrong you were with about 90% of these because you’re clearly an annoying 13 year old who cannot spell or comprehend literature. Oh yes, and because most of these are not real points, just you saying things like “stupid”, nobody will have any real respect for this. If they do, they’re clearly annoying 13 year olds as well. Please do some research, or at least know some common knowledge about the world in general, before you decide to write a post like this.

  322. claire
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 10:42 am

    i love how some people actually take this list seriously correcting grammar and such and trying to be smart and anal at the same time. Get over yourselves morons. We that dont like twilight are a minority so be happy in your stupid fantasy worlds while we suffer through reading youtube video comments that read,”This would be perfect for Twilight” and it’s a song with an apple in it or something completely twi unrelated and stupid. So what if she doesn’t have proper English, apparently neither does Meyer.

  323. Kendra
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 10:43 am

    Ah yes, I forgot to mention one other thing. Stephenie Meyer is making more money than you, pwn.

  324. claire
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 10:44 am

    btw, Kevin, I don’t think someone in the world could be more right.

  325. katiarai
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 11:01 am

    This is brilliant. I’ll admit I haven’t read the entire series but I agree with every single point, especially those about the unhealthiness of Bella and Edward’s relationship and the fact that the author is writing her own wish fulfillment.

  326. Rowan
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 11:41 am

    Well you certainly have a lot of things to say about how long and pointless the books are, yet your list is even more long, pointless, and pathetic. While you do have some good reasons in there, most of them are the same reasons 4 times, or one word reasons with no actual meaning. I think you were too hypocritical, and you arent that great of a book critic.

  327. Cat Night
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 11:54 am

    hello…
    yes i agree with you and im 13…
    Twilight isn’t very interesting and i’ve been trying my best to tell people my age that twilight is quite horrible and im not just reffering to the 1st book, i mean the entire series is horrid…
    the movie was a bit good to me, but i didn’t want to even watch it. my friend dragged me there. Twilight is a ridiculous book…

  328. Andrea
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    I applaud your enthusiasm in attempting to right the stupid girls everywhere who have given up all thoughts of ever becoming independent women by following Bella’s example. No guy will make your life meaningful; only you can make your life meaningful. Don’t let men, or ANYONE, get in the way of you leading a healthy, fun, rewarding life; if they leave you, get over it because it’s not worth killing yourself over. Read Sunshine by Robin McKinley if you want a good, wonderful, romantic vampire book without all the horrible qualities.

  329. Kelly
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    When I first read Twilight, I thought it was everything, I read it practically everyday, and begged my dad to get me the last two books. But, now I realize Stephanie Meyer’s writing is mediocre. The books don’t “suck”, but I’d say she’s not the greatest writer. And also, you know how all you guys getting mad, because twilight fans are mad at you, GET OVER IT!!! Their crazy thinking they have “powers”, but you will never change their mind, until they realize that there are ACTUALLY better books out there.

  330. Anonymous
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    I like Twilight and I agree with this…

  331. Anonymous 2
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    Hmmm, Im not sure if Light Yagami is a good judge…he had a relationship with Misa….

  332. Paige
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    eh, I love the series, but I agree with you. Not to mention the writing is strictly OK. However I think it’s quite entertain but there are so many other great books out there.

  333. Posted April 4, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    Amen to that : )

    I also wrote an article about Twilight and the various sites available where you are free to express you’re rage. ;)

    Great article!

  334. Crazy Cat Lady
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    Let’s get married. (AKA I agree.)

  335. Mafie
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    You are my hero! EVERY girl, here in México, is reading that piece of crap…¬¬ This kind of books only makes girls more stupid. ¬¬

  336. Lana
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 7:25 pm

    I’d just like to point out that Jacob, who you say was good and nice to her, absolutely PILED on the sexual abuse in the third book ‘Eclipse’. Erm, forced kissing including when she’s shoving against him to get away, threatening to kill himself if she doesn’t want to kiss him…etc. :S

  337. Lana
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    TO KEVIN: Post 335

    I enjoyed the Twilight series, and yes I have read Kurt Vonnegut. In fact, I did a book report on “Slaughter House 5″ when I was in grade 6. Just because someone enjoys a mindless read once in a while doesn’t mean that they are idiots.

  338. RowlingHamiltonRice
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    OKay, I haven’t read rice’s books yet, but I can’t wait to. The only thing I would add to this list (and it is an awesome list) is that Edward “Ted” Forester would hunt down Edward Cullen for fun. Ted is a vampire hunter/sociopath in the Anita Blake Vampire Hunter Series, Written by Laural K. Hamilton. Those are real vampires.

  339. amy
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    This list is made for people who have read that book, not for someone who has yet to read it…You should probably change the title of your list, it’s misleading. I stopped reading Goosebumps in elementary school, and would never entertain the possibility of picking this Walmart best seller up off a shelf. You should constructively direct your argument towards the people who are on the fence as to whether they should read it or not.

  340. MakeItGoBoom
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 8:27 pm

    *snicker* yeah, the series would be a whole lot better with gay vamps/weres. really. but they’re good books if you don’t want to have to think about anything.

  341. Impious observer
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 9:11 pm

    FACT: there are books written about the philosophy of other cult classics such as harry potter, lord of the rings, etc

    FACT: this coul not be done with twilight. why? because, espite protestations that the twilight series is “deep”, it goes no deeper than Edward’s sparkling skin.

    p.s. dear Piper, it is in fact possible to be original in some aspects and unoriginal in others. Also, i do not think redefining the terms of vampirism counts as original, because the vampire has been a staple in folklore for many thousands of years, and i believe the author of this list, when referring to “more esteemed authors” probably intended to include the oral “authors” of thousands of years of cultural lore. but, i mean, if ms meyers decided that you no longer had to die to be a zombie, i guess that’d be okay with everyone. i mean, as long as the zombies were hot, right?

  342. laputamage66
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    does no one rember Bram stokers Dracula the original vampire every thing vampires can and cant do are listed there

  343. Tracy
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 9:28 pm

    MAN, I’ve been thinking this for months! Had I known that such a list would become so popular, I would’ve written it myself. I might still add a few points of my own. XD

    Anyway, I agree. TrueBlood is a lot better, largely because THOSE vampires aren’t somehow immuned to sunlight.

  344. Ana
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    Have actually read Twilight though everyone I know thinks I should because I like real vampire novels. If you want a good one read The Historian. Very deep, with real characters and conflict.
    Anyways, Twilight seems to be a cross between vampires and One Tree Hill/The OC or any other teen drama that comes to mind (except those are better/smarter/deeper) and then dumb everything down.

  345. SANE twilight fan
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    Okay, I accept that you don’t like Twilight. This would be okay, as you have a right to your own opinion, if you’d read it. But not spelling Renesmee’s name right, not even once? This makes me doubt the truth behind your statements of how you read the entire saga, and therefore you discredit yourself by not being fully educated on that which you attempt to criticize. Aside from that, you contradict yourself repeatedly…ie., #21 and 39. #49…I’m extremely OCD about grammatical errors (of which you have many in your list), and I didn’t find a single one in any of the four books. #53…anyone who doesn’t live in a cave knows that it’s about vampires, whether they’ve read it or not. So, duh…why shouldn’t she put a great quote on the back, when it’s not revealing anything new anyway?? #52…do any guys actually like ANY romance novels, which is essentially what Twilight is?? #74…of course it doesn’t live up to its hype. Neither did Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings! That doesn’t make them entirely bad, it just means that people over-exaggerate their appeal. #84…no, Jacob didn’t abuse Bella, but neither did Edward. So why shouldn’t she be able to pick whoever she wants?

    I respect that you have an opinion about the books, but at the very least, you could express it in a way that doesn’t make you look foolish.

  346. liljj
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 11:11 pm

    you really hate it that much? because it seemed like you read the whole series really closely….

  347. Lys
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 11:12 pm

    The whole book series is like crack for lonely, over-analyzing, bored women… and men who want to believe there’s some ultimate, magical secret to us/or are trying to get into a fangirls pants.

    It’s awful, really.
    Then again, I’m rather judgmental when it comes to this myself. Three of my friends (one girl and two guys) relate themselves to a certain threesome in the book, constantly. I’m allowed to hate it. I never hear the end of it. They don’t even know who Anne Rice is. WHY!?!! WHY!!!!?!?!?!?!!!!!!

  348. Posted April 4, 2009 at 11:13 pm

    freaking love this. I think its funny. I’m sorry to say, I have not read the books, but from what I hear, a lot of these have popped up in my head such as “straight men don’t sparkle!”

  349. Posted April 4, 2009 at 11:27 pm

    ha ha ha! I don’t recommend Twilight either. It’s too shallow.

  350. Milianne
    Posted April 4, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    You have the right to your own opinion, as do I. Though i think that the Twilight saga was a lovely series, to the point where I would call myself a fan, I would have to say that it is not the best vampire book out there. Honestly try some real vampires. What ever happened to Lestat, or Dracula. Better yet go read some H. P. Lovecraft and get some real reading in.

  351. Posted April 5, 2009 at 12:16 am

    I’ve read Twilight. I agree on the part that Harry Potter is better.

  352. Shay
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 12:19 am

    You are now my favorite person in the entire world.
    Thumbs up.

  353. Ewa
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 12:23 am

    I think that woman need to have something to think about, someone to dream about. Men so often let us down.
    Woman like to think there is at least one man out there who is worthy of a woman. Well that woman is not bella, she is a snobby little brat.
    As far as the People being so obsessive of the book, i think it’s stupid. But then again people are sheep, most people believe what they are told to.

    A lot of those were pretty funny!

  354. Posted April 5, 2009 at 12:44 am

    you clearly had to of watched this movie to have gotten all of that info lol and you have to have watched it a few times to get 95 reason you must really like twilight

  355. A Stumbler
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 1:12 am

    A lot of these reasons are nebulous and could be combined to, say, 25. Or 10, really.

  356. A Twilight Anti-Fan
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 1:39 am

    I fully agree 100% with this list. Twilight is just another crappy excuse for over obsessive fangirls. If they want to obssess they can at least choose a good book.

  357. Francine
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 3:31 am

    I hate the fact that they fell in love so quickly. its ridiculous,it annoys the hell out of me…

  358. Jib
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 5:10 am

    I suggest the Sookie Stackhouse Vampire mystery series instead.

  359. Shai
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 6:38 am

    Do you have ANY idea how many people asked me to explain why i hate twilight..?
    God i will have so many links of this to send now!
    I LOVE YOU ALL.

  360. Stumble...
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 9:47 am

    I love you for writing this. Numbers 43,71,78,81,82 and 86 are Immense :D

  361. Danya
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 10:06 am

    Yes, people are allowed to have their own opinion, they just need to make sure their opinion isn’t worthless. I’m sorry to say, in your case, it is.
    You repeated yourself constantly then criticized Meyer for “dragging on?” This list can be condensed into 5 semi-valid reasons.
    You contradicted yourself by saying that Edward is flawless in your 11th “reason” then calling him extremely possessive, abusive, and boring in number 19.
    You say that she broke rules set out by other authors – darling, since when are there RULES in writing fiction? Especially VAMPIRE fiction. Just because somebody else wrote about vampires before doesn’t make their theories “rules” And Meyer obviously did her research then decided to challenge the archetypal image of a vampire. This doesn’t make her a lousy writer; it makes her a great one.
    Mentioning her not-so-perfect grammar would have been a good reason had you not made plenty mistakes of your own.
    The fact that Meyer depicted Bella’s character in a way that every reader could fit themselves into her shoes does not make Meyer inadequate; but very skilled. Is she not making millions now? You’re either jealous of Meyer or just dense – I’m going with the latter.
    You said it yourself, people are allowed to have their own opinions, but they don’t have to go around passing judgment on opinions that don’t match their own.
    It seems as if most of your reasons are about you hating Twilight because everyone else loves it: Get over yourself. The world does not revolve around you and being negative doesn’t make you “unique” it just makes you stupid.

  362. Qrjusz
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 10:29 am

    Oh come on! It ain’t no Heller nor Eco! You don’t like it: don’t read it. There are TONS of literature which is even worse. I guess it’s fine that kids read anything

  363. danica
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 10:31 am

    I think the whole series is horrible. I guess it’s aimed for teenage girls, but being 17 myself, I can hardly call this a literary work of art. Vampires are such an unoriginal idea, and Twilight seems to be jumping on the bandwagon. It makes me sad that people think that Twilight is “good litterature” but I think we should just be happy that people are getting off their lazy arses and reading!

  364. Nicole!!
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 11:56 am

    OMFG I LOVE YOU FOR POSTING THIS… my “best friend” said she totally hated it and then some other chick told her how great it was so she ended up reading it and watching the movie and now she loves it and is obsessed with… I shouldn’t even have to say his name but for the record… EDWARD wooo! and wants a guy like that. not to mention she tried forcing me to read and watch the movie and i on the other hand refuse to be hypocritical and say i hate it and then go read/watch it .. im sorry but no i refuse to belong in any kind of Twilight cult.. i hate twilight soo much i can’t even stand the word .. how embarrassing..

  365. Lex
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    Okay, you were a teenager once right? well id hope so.

    Charisle didn’t just turn all teenagers into vampires…he also turned Esme into one. also if you read the book a lot of the vampire’s are young when they are turned into vampires.

    Just because Twiliht is not a ‘typica;’ vampire book you shouldn’t just write it off. I liked the book because it was different in that regard..

    You just refuse to let people hope to find the man of their dreams… Even in if it was a guy named edward. Sometimes you just love people regardless of who they are..

    you dont sound like a very happy person…and hate is a bad word. her plot wasn’t the greatest (lets face it) but people found the story mystical and it gave them hope… and some people are crazy ( i mean people reacted the same way to harry potter…) so you have nothing there…

  366. Mr. Grammar
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    I love when people harp about grammatical errors of others’ writing when their own posts are so flagrantly error-ridden that they become hypocrites through their own posting.

    I’m not talking about the OP, though. I’m talking about comment posters who are, hopefully, merely uneducated and don’t know any better. If they are properly educated, shame on them for being stupid beyond repair.

  367. God
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    i….i love you.

  368. cool man
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    awsome

  369. bear
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    i think this is halarious! but i still like twilight. I agree with #8 by julie, there are a bunch of books that suck more than twilight and its unfair for people to tell little girls (twilights’ intended audience) that it sucks.

  370. Cheesy name
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    THE BEST EXPLANATION OF TWILIGHT EVER!!!!!!!! Harry Potter is much better than this garbage.

  371. Lindy
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    4. And when he leaves she attempts to commit suicide.
    She doesn’t attempt to commit suicide. In fact, she says on several occasions that she’s going to keep her promise to him that she wouldn’t even if he doesn’t keep his promise to stay.

    5. Meyer is living out her own fantasies by writing about Bella, who is clearly herself.
    This makes it a bad book because . . . many authors have written themselves into the characters in their books. Or artists in their works of art.

    7. All the rules Meyer sets for being a vampire are broken by the end of the series.
    Which ones?

    8. Not only that, she breaks rules set by more esteemed authors.
    This is her own work, she’s not copying other vampire stories. Her vampire lore is different. Again, this makes it a bad book how . . .

    11. Edward is too perfect and has no flaws either. Even vampires should have flaws besides wanting to suck human blood because it’s natural to them.
    Edward does have flaws. The book is written from Bella’s perspective, and she thinks he’s perfect, so obviously from her point of view, he doesn’t have any. He does not see himself that way, nor do many of the readers. For one, if I were Bella, I would hate that Edward was constantly thinking I was too fragile to do anything for myself. Oh and wait, Bella does get frustrated with this about him in each book of the series. So one example of a flaw there.

    13. If Bella is so ‘plain’, why do so many guys fall for her within the first two chapters?
    Bella isn’t plain. She only sees herself that way. The books are from her perspective mostly, and there isn’t anyone in the world who truly thinks of themselves completely beautiful and without flaws. Edward is constantly telling her “you don’t see yourself clearly” when she comments on her plainness.

    15. Isn’t it convenient that her father always leaves her alone and doesn’t question her? Real parents aren’t that way.
    There are MANY parents that are this way. Ever heard of neglect?

    21. This book contains no real sex, so it’s not really a vampire novel.
    Since when do vampires and sex have to be constantly intertwined? In fact, as a fan of occult and vampire fiction, I find it ridiculous that the mainstream view of vampires comes down to cleavage, leather, and whips. Dominatrix and Vampires are not synonymous. Also, Stephanie Meyer is religious, and these are teenage fiction novels. From her perspective, keeping the sex out of it is good for her age group of readers.

    25. She never uses the word fangs in the entire book series, and it’s supposedly about vampire.
    Again, this is a different view of vampires. It’s her lore, not that of Anne Rice. These vampires don’t NEED fangs. Their teeth are sharp enough without them. We’re not talking double toothed puncture wounds here via Buffy.

    31. Meyer can’t think of original names. The only original name she used was Rennesme, which is combination of two names and doesn’t count.
    The names she uses for the characters are appropriate because of each character’s time-line. Edward was a popular name for his time. The same for the other vampire characters. Even those characters that are human have names that go along with their time. Bella’s friend, Jessica, is mentioned to have the same name as three others from her old school. It’s done to show the contrast, to explain that it is a common name for their age group. Meyer goes over all this in the novel.

    43. Stephen King agrees that Stephanie Meyer can’t write ‘worth a darn’.
    I’ve honestly never liked Stephen King. Umm the “Langoliers” anyone?Laughable.

    70. There’s nothing worse than a fan girl going insane over a fictional guy. It’s rather pathetic actually, so, um, yeah, get a life and keep reading those books, chickies.
    I really don’t see the difference in girls appreciating a character in a book much like others have done. For one example, there’s Romeo. He’s been idolized a lot longer. It’s tween fandom. He’s the new tiger beat guy. What teenage girl hasn’t idolized some character in a book, tv show, or movie? Guys idolize the girls in playboy or sports illustrated, or maxim. Idolization has many forms.

    I think you should have your opinions. Hate Twilight all you want. I just thought a few, non-aggressive opinions from a Twilight fan might be a breath of fresh air.

  372. Nathan
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    I totally and completely agree with this page, but it was a little iffy when Sarah Rebecca started insulting Meyer’s grammar; Sarah made countless mistakes throughout this entire list.

  373. Saint
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    I’m not a big harry potter fan so the few reasons you listed that involved HP I sorta threw out but all the ones commenting on Bella’s backward mindless female personality hit home. The books were something to read but I wouldn’t give them much fanfare. I saw the movie unfortunately which in all its stupidity made Bella out to be some sort of feminist which pissed me the hell off. Stephanie Meyers has created a cult..just about any brainless twit can do that.

  374. Liz
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    wow 95 reasons and you didn’t even get to any of the parts of the series where she goes on and on about stuff unrelated to the plot like what clothes she was picking out or food she was eating for dinner Lame

  375. meeksj
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    I cannot say, honestly, that it was a bad movie. I can not speak for the book, but the movie was not bad. I kind of liked the vampire baseball. How many movies or books do you really read or watch where vampires play baseball. They can only play when there is a thunderstorm… This is a small detail but not to bad. The whole “hunt” when the ponytailed vampire is after the girl and Edward “comes to the resuce,” of course it’s a little cheesy, who doesn’t like a little bit of a cheesy story every now and than. You are taking it a little to serious, relax, kick your feet up and breath easy for a little while. It was not that bad. Coming up with 95 reasons to dislike anything let alone a movie is a little overboard.

  376. Johnny
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    Reason number 96 that Twilight sucks: There are now at least 388 comments on the original post. Wtf, really.

    P.S. Don’t bother to tell me that I contributed to the comments, I know that. After all, I did take time to write this, didn’t I?

  377. Juliet Christie Murray
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    The funniest thing when I saw the title of this article I was genuine intrigue because I thought it was going to say somrthing about hating the real twilight. I wondered who could hate twilight. Well in Jamaica I could because of the amount of mosquitoes that come out at this time. I love though twilight because it lends a fairy pink to the place and building that are not so beautiful take on a romantic look.I have a builder friend whose used to make fun at some houses saying they could only be sld at twilight.
    So your Twilight book seem to be similiar some will hate it for the mosquitoes they find in it and some will love it because of the unrealistic characters and story line. So he what the heck read it if you like to each his own.
    http://www.specular-jamaica.com

  378. Brandon
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    Youre totally right.

    A girl at school had to to a hierarchy tree (A list-like chart that shows one large concept, and breaks it down into different ones)

    She put Vampires and Fantasy separate. I felt like picking up my desk and throwing it at her. And what was an example of Vampire novels? Twilight.

    I feel like a retard being surrounded by twitards.

  379. Sam
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 9:23 pm

    I can’t lie, I do like the books, but I understand your point. I adored this article. It made me laugh basically from beginning to end. You had very valid points. I guess that makes me a bad Twilight fan. All well, I’m over it. They are possibly some of my favorite books, and I am aware that they are two-dimensional. It’s BECAUSE we can put ourselves in Bella’s shoes that attracts girls to them. I don’t wait around for anyone like Edward, or anything. I think people who want to do something like that are utterly wasting their time because, well, it’s a fictional character, and he does not exist. Also, just because Robert Pattinson plays Edward in the movie, this does not mean he is actually like Edward. You should have put that on your list. :) I’ve met so many Twilight-obsessed girls that are all, “I’m going to marry Robert and make him act like Edward and we will be in love and he will be romantic!!!!!!!” To which I am forced to reply, “Hmmm…. Keep me posted on how that works out for you.” Sorry, I apologize for rambling. In conclusion, Kudos to this posting. I needed a good laugh. :D

  380. gabrielle
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 10:42 pm

    I agree with you, because i know it is not good literature. but if you hate it very much, why waisting your time reading the book and writing 95 reaons??….i think you should let the people to think whatever they like about the book….

  381. Lauren
    Posted April 5, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    i. love. you.
    :)

  382. niki
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 12:38 am

    Hey, 394:

    The book made millions because millions of boring people like buying popular things.

  383. twlight fan
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 12:42 am

    Quite frankly I think you are a moron.

    Yes the internet is a place to voice your opinion… however, your ‘reasons not to read it’ are merely that… your own opinion… you have not provided any substantial reason for someone not to read this book saga.

    It always amuses me when people are bitter about someone else’s success. You say that it’s not as good as Harry Potter, in your opinion.. HOWEVER, regardless of how successful Harry Potter is NOW, are you aware that at least 7 publishing houses turned it down before it was published?…so plenty of people thought it wasn’t even worth publishing.

    You’re entitled to your opinion but don’t dress it up as a list of reasons why someone shouldn’t read it. Oh yes and if it was really as bad as you claim it to be then you wouldn’t
    have bothered to finish the book let alone the entire saga!…I have put many a book down after the first chapter because it was dreadful… perhaps you should have done the same and then we wouldn’t have been exposed to this lame and ridiculous list of INCORRECT ‘reasons’ not to read it.

  384. loveislikekitties@hotmail.com
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 12:59 am

    bwahaha! you sir/madam are a brilliant genius! and i mean that in the most sincerest way! i thought i was the only one who thought this series was CRAP. all of it was just totally utter rubbish!

    btw

    Go Death Note! and I’m pretty sure L doesn’t approve either…. just saying cuz well he’s a genius much like your self.

    thanks and i pretty much love ya! haha

    ~GenmetsuReikou

  385. impartial
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 1:20 am

    Number 11 and number 19 are contradictions no matter what you think of the book. That annoys me.

  386. RiRi
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 1:48 am

    …I applaud you for this.

    “Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.”

    This whole thing made me laugh ridiculously hard, but that one just killed me.

  387. Amber
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 1:53 am

    I actually enjoy the series, but this was incredible. You’re pretty much spot on with everything. I particularly loved number 66.

  388. Jingo Mantis
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 2:55 am

    I didn’t read the book, and I don’t care what anyone has to say about it. This blog hidden deep within the internet got more attention than most things of actual importance do. More than 400 posts telling one another that “your opinion is wrong.” Don’t waste your breath, read what you like to read. Do not stem your life or your what you believe from a popular series of fictional books about vampires. And for christ-sakes, OP, if you consider things like ’she tries to kill herself when he leaves,’ & she can’t do anything without him, then you’ve already lost.

  389. me
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 4:26 am

    go kira!

  390. niamh
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 4:34 am

    too many people i know have only gotten half way through the book.

  391. Do Cantin-Meaney
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 8:58 am

    Nice thoughts. You’ve clearly thought about this carefully.

  392. bookmaggot
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 9:10 am

    You do realize that by having so many complaints about the book(s) you have actually read them? I think that Kind of defeats your objective in complaining.

    But maybe that’s just my outlook on the subject.

  393. Posted April 6, 2009 at 9:32 am

    LMAO, Some are so true, but thats one of the things you have to love about twilight,
    Its meyers first and she’s good, she has room to improve and I look forward to reading more of her books.

  394. firewolf
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 10:19 am

    you have some good points, i have always prided myself on being able to read just about anything, and what i couldnt i put it up and read another and then went back to it, but i could not get past the first page of the book no matter what i tried, it was just…..idk. The main problem i have is the Ed. obsessed fan girls i have to be around

  395. Habubrat
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 10:24 am

    I thoroughly enjoyed them! But I have never read Vampire Genre and have no interest in them, so for me comparing was irrelevant. The movie was not enjoyable however. But that’s nothing new when books are made into movies, the book is generally better.

  396. stumbler
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 10:24 am

    I agree that everyone is truly entitled to their own opinions, and that will never change-especially on the internet.
    However, I do find it quite funny and pathetic that you are targeting a book aimed for pre-teens that became more famous than expected,and congratulations for Stephanie Myer for nailing it right on the head!
    There are better writers out there and there is much more imaginative plots but at the end of the day no-one fources you to read the series!
    Yes, i do agree that Twilight seems to have spewed up all over the internet, but if it annoys you so much then stop talking about it-one less post about it to deal with then.

  397. firewolf
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 10:25 am

    you have some good points, i have always prided myself on being able to read just about anything, and what i couldnt i put it up and read another and then went back to it, but i could not get past the first page of the book no matter what i tried, it was just…..idk. The main problem i have is the Ed. obsessed fan girls i have to be around

  398. Beth
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 10:53 am

    To say that neither Edward nor Bella have any flaws is ridiculous…have you actually read the books? Edward clearly has a huge ego due to the fact that he can read minds and thinks he’s heard it all. Bella clearly has emotional issues because of her relationships with her parents (and let me tell you, there are PLENTY of parents like Charlie out there), which may be partly why she’s so dependent upon Edward. Not to mention that Edward really is a terribly selfish being to not stay away from her when he knows how dangerous it can be for her, and Bella is willing to throw away her soul to spend eternity with him. If that’s not flawed, I don’t know what is.

    Most of your reasons are not even valid critiques of the book…such as numbers 4, 5, 9, 21, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 89-95, just for starters. More than half your reasons have nothing to do with the book and everything to do with either Stephenie Meyer’s personality, quotes from people who don’t like the book, or attacking those who do like the book. In this list, I’d say there’s maybe 15 valid points (none of which you explained adequately). If you’re going to bother making a list like this, at least back it up instead of just saying “Harry Potter’s better.” Okay…explain to me why Harry Potter is better?

    Is Twilight the next War and Peace? Is Twilight the next Pride and Prejudice? Of course not. It was written merely to entertain pre-teens and any other romantics at heart. I enjoyed reading the books, because it was strictly entertainment. I am completely insulted by your statement in number 61: “ALL Twilight fans are insane…”

    Because clearly, I’m not.

    Also, you may want to start a list: 95 Reasons why Sarah’s List Makes Her a Hypocrite (grammatical errors, it’s flawed, it’s not well written, etc.). If you’re going to pick on someone, then make sure you don’t have those same flaws.

  399. Allison
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    Although there are quite a few legitimate reasons why some people hate Twilight, I have to admit that I love it. I will acknowledge the fact that it is not written so well, but it doesn’t matter to me. I enjoy it. It makes me happy. I am entirely aware that this book will never win a Pulitzer and the movie will never win an Oscar, but it is not meant to. This book was not written to do so. It was written to give girls (and yes I know a few straight guys who love it, also) an interesting love story to read. Yes, some fan girls take things too far, and that makes the rest of us seem insane, too. But believe me when I tell you that there are indeed a few intelligent, college girls who thoroughly enjoy this saga.

  400. Sarah
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    I have to say, I kind of agree with Allison when she wrote that “there are indeed a few intelligent college girls who thoroughly enjoy this saga”. I’ll be honest, when I first read these books, I did fall under Edward’s spell. It isn’t hard to see why, especially for us college girls who have had our hearts broken: a guy who lives just to protect you is, let’s face it, kind of alluring. Now, almost a year later, I could not be more sick of hearing about this series. The movie was laughable (although Jasper’s baseball trick was sexy), and I want to gag every time I see something about the stars. Anyways, the series doesn’t do it for me anymore. And while I don’t want to sound like some concerned parent, because I honestly don’t really even like children, it does kind of irk me that Bella has become some sort of heroine for girls. Young girls have enough moronic “role models” as it is. Can we please not force feed them another one? I guess I think girls should maybe wait to read this until they are a little older and can fully recognize how ridiculous the love story is. I keep wondering what’s gonna happen when Bella and Edward get sick of one another? I mean, do they LITERALLY not change, emotions and all? If so, then I’m burning my copies, because that is just absurd. My advice? If you want a REAL vampire love story, check out “Let the Right One In”. That is love, boiled down to its most basic elements. None of this “he’s hot so let’s overlook the fact that he’s a murderer” junk. Ugh. My one positive thought on “Twilight”: it is definitely brain candy. When the world is getting me down, or I feel like maybe I’ve been thinking too much, I know I can turn to Bella and for a few hours, pretend to be a mindless, gibbering (I’m talking to you Kristin Stewart; that hospital scene was atrocious) idiot. Ah, sweet, sweet bliss.

  401. ...
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    here is one to add to the list, the only reason the books became so popular is because of the movie, I read the first book like two years ago and it just became popular this year…thats sad

  402. JG
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    Here’s where I agree with you:
    Yes, it’s cheesy and Edward is the embodiment of the guy many girls can only have in their dreams.
    Yes, people have gone completely insane over this book, but it’s happened before with a book you laud so profusely in this post–Harry Potter. It went so far with those books that the church actually tried to ban it, and some churches were successful. Don’t get me wrong, I like Harry Potter, but all that trouble over fictional words?
    Here’s what I think you should know:
    The battle between vampires and werewolves is not original, you’re right. But it’s not like she saw it on myspace and took it. Watch Van Helsing. Who are the only ones who can kill a vampire in that movie? Werewolves. I think there may be some basis in legend there, much like in Harry Potter with many of the creatures.
    Yes, most certainly, you are entitled to your opinion just as much as a Twilight fan (which I am not. I’ve seen the movie, thought it was pretty good, but a bit cheesy, and Edward seemed quite stalker-ish until he finally got together with Bella. And guess who in my house wants to buy the movie and read the books? My fiancee. By the way, he’s a guy.), this doesn’t mean that stating your opinion includes making fun of those who defend their own opinions (which, you make clear, they are entitled to). State your opinion. Some of your points are funny, but don’t insult the people who don’t think like you. That’s just foolish.

    In conclusion, sure, it’s not a masterpiece, but it does what books are meant to do: it gives its readers a world in which they can place themselves and relate to the characters. Let them have that, just like people allow you to enjoy the books you read. You could have spend the time gathering this information (you actually asked random people on the street?) doing something productive with your life. Keep that in mind for the next time you decide your life just isn’t interesting enough and you think you need to anger others for entertainment.

    Good luck

  403. Sandra
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    LMAO !!!

    I’m so glad someone said something about the spider monkey line! That was the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. In fact it will probably remain in history forever because of its stupidity. I do have to be honest and say that I did enjoy the books, but I also laughed a lot while reading this.

    THANKS

  404. Mon
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    Although I agree with you and I don’t think the Twilight series is quality literature, if you want your criticisms taken seriously I don’t think it’s a good idea to include petty arguments like “it’s stupid” on your list. Some of your points are right on, though!

  405. someotherperson
    Posted April 6, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    although i don’t like twilight as much as the next guy, i found almost all 95 reasons extremely dumb. how many goddamned times do you need to repeat that the vampires sparkle, bella has no personality, or that you don’t like that edward is “hot” in the book? these “95 reasons” could easily be compacted into 20 actual good reasons. how can you count #95 for instance. one of your 95 reasons for disliking a book being that you wrote 95 reasons for disliking it is contradictory. You critiqued bad writing with more bad writing, splendid

  406. Eve C
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 4:45 am

    I agree with this blog. I think Twilight and all the other books are overrated.

  407. I KUSH I
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 6:39 am

    Nice statements made.I totally agree with you.But I dont get why you said fangs were never talked about in the story when it talks about it when Bella talks to Edward about it.

  408. Blaze
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 8:18 am

    Can’t even read the whole first book, to plain for me. Besides, who can read a book about whiny teenagers. Teenagers fall in and out of love everyday in the world, and then most try to kill themselves over it. *get over it* Im so sick of ‘Twilight this, and Twilight that’ *ugh*

  409. bookmaggot
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 9:26 am

    I have to agree with sarah and allison. I read this book for the first time in for a college course, and then had to create a teaching unit based on this book. While it may not be the “best” book in the world, it has it’s possibilities. I enjoy the books because I understand the difference between reality and fantasy. I am not insane because i enjoy light reading. I just have different priories in my reading material. Its good to relax once in awhile, and not have to worry about analyzing what I’m reading.

  410. _bella_is_me
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    You do realise that every single one of your points is what is commonly known as COMPLETE AND UTTER RUBBISH? Ok, you say that it isn’t a proper vampire book because it is clean, then that it is too adult for ten-year-olds (I read it when I was ten; have I been scarred for life? Except for where James bit me, no.). You also say that it is cliche, and then reprimand Meyer for ‘not obeying the rules’. And these are just two examples! I don’t mean to be rude (it’s just a compulsion), but do you have some kind of obsession with oxymorons?

  411. Posted April 7, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    it was good

  412. TwilightFOREVERox
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    4 and 5 are the most crappest reasons ever! If you READ new moon, you’d know she jumped of the cliff because she was cliff diving, and Jacob wasn’t there. She did the adrelaline jump to hear Edwards voice, so to be honest read first ok? and Bella is NOT stephanie, she clearlt stated that she worte this series baed on a dream of a girl and vampire in a meadow, and wrote that scene first. To be honest, all of the above reasons were complete nonsence. I, am one of those twilight obsessive fans, and to be honest, whats wrong with liking something. Its like me finding out what YOU like and critizing it, wouldn’t like it would you? No so leave the twilight saga, stephanie meyer (an AMAZING first time novelist) the cast and everything about twiliht alone. Like my mum says, if you havent got anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all.

  413. 351200.21
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    All fans need to get a life becuz this book sucks!

  414. Zoe
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    Ok, so maybe Twilight isn’t the best book in the world. But, seriously, if they tortured you THAT much, than why did you read all four? I myself used to love the books, but then I discovered that they were all the same thing. Edward. But when you wrote that you aren’t considering that some people who LOVE the books may read that. Think about it.

  415. insanefreddy
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    Wow, I’m pretty sure about ninety-two of those reasons aren’t real justifiable reasons at all. Twilight isn’t all that great of a book, but this article is a bunch of meaningless, unsubstantiated, tautological crap, if you ask me.

  416. Posted April 7, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    Holy crap… There are more worthless comments from today alone than there is article! That means this is really really really good! And it is. While it seems five or so of the reasons stated weren’t real reasons and were just thrown in for fun, this really did state, in essence, why Twilight is crap.

    You forgot to mention that they bite on the wrist. I have never heard of vampires biting someone on the wrist to suck their blood. Being poisonous is a maybe, but the wrist is a no-no. They go for the neck.

    Way to go on the ‘no plot development’ reasons. That hit the series dead on. I wish that people would get that worked up over a book, series, movie, or TV show with any real backround instead of brainless romance, stupidly thought out plots, and expensive special effects.

    Spoiler: This article is meant to be funny everyone! Laugh at it, cry at it, piss yourself and have a stroke because your so goddam obsessed with Twilight, just shuddap and stop complaining. No one wants to hear/read you complaining about how this hurt your feelings. Give some constructive criticism at the very least if you want to complain. Retards.

  417. woopwoop
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    this is hilariousnesses i tottly agree with you.
    ur reasons for hating it are justified
    BUT i actually have read the twilight saga many times
    u porbli fink im wierd now
    buh why are you giving other ppl reasons for not reading it, yh its a frikin shyt peice of litriture and you find it so damn annoying but broadfcating tht on the net is just LAME
    people dnt read for others
    so ppl STOP having a dig at books everyones diffrent and i find this tottly takin the p***

  418. Rosalie Cullen*
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    You know what!? What is ur problem guys??
    TWILIGHT… is an AWESOME… book!!!!!***
    Unlike all of you out there who says it sucks!!
    But that’s just my opinion!

  419. "MARY"
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    Even though i read all the books i do think that some of your reasons are funny and totally true. I think that to many people are obsessed wit it.

  420. o.o
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    Harry Potter was willing to sacrifice himself to save the world. Edward watches girls sleep at night.

  421. Raiden Delter
    Posted April 7, 2009 at 11:33 pm

    to the guy above me:

    lolz man yet so true

  422. Bianca
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 8:42 am

    truth be told i love twilight i thought that it was a great movie and although some dont think so i love the movie aswell. but just because i love the book doesn’t mean i can’t bash it. bella is the manliest girl i have ever seen apart from a girl at my old school. i think this list was freakin.

  423. carole
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 8:46 am

    i lovee twilight to be truly honest with u. i don’t think anyone should bash the book just b/c they don’t like it. they just have to deal with it and move on with thier figgin lives!!!! i mean come on the posts you had were totally unnessacery!!!!!! people need to deal with the fact that others, like me, love the books and the movie!! people shouldn’t bash the books as i already said.

  424. Bianca
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 8:49 am

    i mean i love the movie and the book

  425. Jeannine
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 9:40 am

    I liked the books, but I totally agree with you. There’s way too much hype and it doesn’t stack up WHATSOEVER!
    Plus, all those stupid people that say it’s better than Harry Potter.. News flash, NOTHING will ever compare to Harry Potter. =]

  426. meme
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    your insane the book was beyond perfect it was better then gone with the wind although i think your right about jasper and alice she doesn’t talk alot about them and there characters are realley interesting…

  427. Angela
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    soo true i hate twilight it so stupid people are obsessed

  428. Victoria
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    I loved Twilight but could not get into the rest of the books. I agree with 13. I mean its so true but most of your other examples are repeats, quotes which dont prove to be evidence that Twilight is dumb, and or jokes. This was very piontless. Your word would be more stronger and you would win over more people to hate twilight if you acctually made a research paper with correct proof. Here are some examples i have a problem with.
    : 15. He leaves Bella out alon because she has proven to be responsible and thats how it ussually is when your a teenager with one parent to live with.

    34. This is an example of no proof! Hello its called their fans!

    35. She is trying to get rich or become a famous writer of course the plot is goin to drag on. She wants to spread out her ideas for more books.

    my last example i will critize even though there are more is..

    60. Carisle is saving them. If you were dying and your what 40, he would save you if he was real.

    Thank you.

    ~ This piece of writing was inspected by Victoria Wright the writers critic.

    Even though i disagree your writing deserved 3 stars.

  429. Diana
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    Yo guys, chill..
    This is just a book.. No im not a twilight crazy fan, or an anti-twilight, im a neutral (though i do hate kstew as Bella)but i just think you’re making suc a big deal out of it..

    unless, it’s all for the lulz

  430. Ami
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    OK. I do like the books, but not as much as some of my friends. Anyway, you say the same 10 thing like all 95 times. Example:

    25. Her vampires sparkle. Enough said

    48. Straight men sparkle?

    51. Edward Cullen is sparkly; crows like sparkly thing

    Ok we get it. You think it is weird that Edward Sparkles. WE GET IT! Also, the following is not a reason!

    88. You are allowed to have your own opinion, just like we are allowed to have ours. Get over it. Twilight fans don’t seem to understand that though and attack at the mention of flaw in the book.

    And isn’t number 14 the whole point of this list?

    14. It’s stupid

    I agree that Harry Potter kicks Edward’s butt, and i hate the movie.

  431. J
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    “9. The world population will come to an end because all girls who read this book will think they are Bella and will wait for their Edward to come until they are old. And he’ll never come.”

    So you think the only purpose of females, your own gender, is to have kids? What if we don’t want to have kids?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “This book contains no real sex, so it’s not really a vampire novel.”

    And yet you say Bella is the shallow one. Ha.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “Why is it called the Twilight Series if only one book is titled Twilight?”

    That’s what series are called. The clique series, the series of unfortunate events, etc. Common sense.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “Stephanie Meyer must really be into pedophilia: first Edward and Bella, now Jacob and Renesseme? SPOILER.”

    You don’t say SPOILER after u SPOIL it. That’s just stating the obvious. Either that, or you just don’t understand – we read left to right, top to bottom. And the countless times you’ve said SPOILER like that? (cont. below)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “You don’t have to describe the character every two pages, we know all about Edward’s ‘perfectly toned chest’ the fourth time she mentions it.”

    Accusing the book of being repetitive? Look who’s talking.

  432. antitwilight
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    I’m just going to say it. Twilight was a horrible book and movie and we should all buy the series just to rip it apart and burn it in the streets. I’m not against those who like twilight, its just that you don’t just like it your addicted to it. All the girls at my school have Twilight shirts and sweatshirts and have the book at all times. If they had to let go of the book to live I think they would gladly die. I don’t think this of all Twilight lovers just the one at my school who cuddles the book like a teddy bear.

  433. antitwilight
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    Heres the main reason I hate Twilight: Meyers is a terrible writer but is getting all this publicity and money even though there are way better writers out there who actually deserve it.

  434. Katie
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    Don’t love it, don’t hate it.

    To Twilight haters : Enough with the mean burns. They can like whatever they want. There’s no reason to be rude to the author, either. She never expected the book to be this big, anyway. Gosh, this book is to be read and enjoyed. You’re not supposed to get anything out of it, no life lessons or morals or life changing revelations. The point was to enjoy reading a book.

    And to Twilight fanatics: It’s only a book! It’s NOT REAL. Deal with it. No reason to have your life revolve around it. It’s not healthy to be obsessed with a fictional character. There’s also no need to be so defensive if a person critiques one minor detail of it. Meyer is a decent writer, but you can;t deny that the book has may flaws. Just read it, like it, and be done.

    And to all you poeple who waste your time arguing about a book: LEAVE EACH OTHER ALONE! Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but there is no need to be extreme when trying to tear down the other side. I pity anyone who would take the time to be involved with all of this BS. Just leave it.

  435. Jeff
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    Rant much eh?

  436. Angie
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    Aha, I laughed numerous times at this.
    I want to high-five you for making this.
    But the BEST reason has to be reason 66!
    Hilarious!
    I can’t thank you enough for posting this!
    :3

  437. KLR
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    … i love you.

  438. ECB
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    Bra.Vo.

  439. DeeDee
    Posted April 8, 2009 at 11:53 pm

    You are amazing and I couldn’t agree more with all the reasons above. Love #66 the most ;)

  440. Mark Grisham
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 12:18 am

    Now, I have not read the Twilight series, and I have no intention to. In my own opinion, it is a Wanna-be Harry Potter spin-off. But HP was better. But it was a fad. Just like Twilight. Its an easy way for the author to make an easy million bucks, but that is where the puck ends.

    In 5 years, all the Twilight lovers will look back and realize, “Jeez, I was so immature.”

  441. sam
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 10:19 am

    please do read my poems .they pretty good.really

  442. kyle
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 10:37 am

    twilight sucks. and the three books that follow it.
    all 95 were great but #81 was the best.Chuck Norris would kill ed in less than one one millionth of a second.

    Chuck Norris RULES!!!!!

  443. OBSESSEDtwilightFAN!
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    Stephanie Meyer is a FIRST TIME WRITER!  comprende?  She woke up from a dream, with NO writing experience what so ever and wrote. Within 3 weeks, twilight was created. Twilight fans like myself LOVE the series because of the great PLOTS AND STORY LINES! The books are brilliant, and if not, why have millions across the world read them ? I could start bashing something you PERSONALLY love ok? please respond so I can start. I will run with my awesome vampire abilities to Volterra, Italy and provoke the Volturi and blame you. Demitri will track you using your brain waves and your senses will be cut of by Alec and you will be tortured by Jane ok? haha. boo sucks to you suckers (:  btw, if you hate the twilight series so much, why waste i don’t know, blog space and DAYS writing a 95 point list. And YOU personally have obviously read the books MORE THAN ONCE to pick up the knowledge to make these accusations. So if you hated them so much the first time, why re-read?  Ok, thats all, I am obviuosly not looking for a arguement but I am argueing my point. (which is right mwahaha)Goodbye. Leah Clearwater.

  444. mwahaha#2
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    To the reason number 25. SHE DOES USE THE WORD FANGS IN ECLIPSE. Jacob asks Bella what it is like to have Edward. SO READ BEFORE POSTING CRAP!

  445. mikee
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    wow, a lot of responses.
    I thought your list was funny.

    I personally have read the first book, and I own the second and third — haven’t gotten around to reading those though.
    I’m a sixteen year old girl, and I thought it was alright.
    it certainly should not be held to very high literature standards, in comparison to real works of art such as dickinson or twain, and I don’t think most people understand that.

    for a TEEN hokey pokey novel, it’s alright.
    for a book in general, in comparison to all books, it’s about a two on a scale of ten.

    it’s simple, everything is laid out for you.
    no need to think about metaphors or symbolism or parallelism.
    it’s just there.

  446. Nosferatu
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    Ok I read the book and liked it , now I don’t like ur good and ur right p.s. Chucks Norris couldn’t take Edward, why would a guy like Chuck Norris even try to fight Edward knowing Edward stood no chance and it would just waste his time

  447. Reno
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    Wow, I just read comment number #455, and wow. Some people really need to be checked out to a doctor if they honestly believe they have magical vampire abilities, or have vampire friends.

    Anyways – I have not read Twilight, only been told about all the ‘amazing plot twists’, and honestly, they aren’t that great. I don’t know why Meyer (being a first time writer as someone pointed out) would go for a romance novel about NOTHING.

    I really wish people would just shut up about how great Twilight is. Jeez. I agree with miss Sarag btw. :D

  448. Wowwwww
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    You really need to grow up and accept that if some people like it, than they like. Oh and you should think of better excuses that “Since when to straight guys sparkle” if you want to make the list this long. Grow up.

  449. Gisseykidd
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    all of these reasons are the same ones i’ve been telling my edward obsessed classmates. if you think about this logically, the books make absolutley no sense and im tired of the twilight craze.

    ugh.

    another reason why i hate the books:

    in breaking dawn, jacob imprinted on renesmee. she is a half-VAMPIRE, half-HUMAN. to me, it makes no sense on how jacob could imprint on the Human side of her, when she has 2 sides. werewolves and vampires are common enemies, no sense and frankly, twilight can kick rocks.

    my new books- The Mortal Instruments trilogy-By Cassandra Clare. actual good writing and its not deficient like twilight.

  450. rose
    Posted April 9, 2009 at 11:59 pm

    agreed.
    the book needs a 5th addition.
    edward finally touches jacobs penis, and realizes ‘hey that was pretty cool’

  451. Posted April 10, 2009 at 3:00 am

    wow u really hate the books i never watched the show movie watever nor read the books. they dont really intrest me

  452. Ann O'Nonimous
    Posted April 10, 2009 at 8:33 am

    Haha. A lot of these are true, and 53 and 56 made me laugh. Yes, they are really badly written (Mary Sue red alert!) and they are complete trash, but…I liked them. A couple of things annoyed me, like the “no sex before marriage” thing when neither of the characters are religious, and the convenience of Bella’s amazing self control in Breaking Dawn etc. etc. but they’re good when you have nothing else to do and can’t be bothered to think about what you’re reading.

    You’d never tell I’m a literature student…I should be ashamed!

  453. laurissa
    Posted April 10, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    ummm i do have to agree with like maybe 2 reasons but this “95 reasons” suck big gorills ones!!! most of your reasons repeat themselves over and over and over… and you siad the book was predictable….pshh please

  454. Diva_Tink
    Posted April 10, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    Ok my friend was looking this up and I have something 2 say, YOU ALL must be ppl with NO life if your going 2 waste ALL ur time reading and writing this. *NEWS FLASH* – everything this retard wrote is NOT TRUE!So u all r just WASTING UR TIME ON THIS HORRIBLE SITE! So all u life-wasters reading this crap, just 2 let u no AGAIN its NOT TRUE! Im a fan of Twilight, and im sticking up 4 it because all this crap is fake and stupid.

    TO: HORRIBLE RETARDED SITE

  455. Random Person
    Posted April 10, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    Uhh ive never read Twilight, but I hate it because it justannoys me :P
    And to everyone who is attacking this page, why? 2 Questions
    1. She only wrote this to voice her opinion, so if someone hated your opinion, how would feel?
    2. Why are you even SEARCHING I hate twilight XD Just and ideaa.

  456. i hate stupid twilight!!!!!
    Posted April 10, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    you now what!!!!!!!!!!!WHY DID THEY EVEN MADE TWILIGHT IF NO ONE LIKE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!UGH!!!!!!!IM GOING TO KILL THAT PERSON WHO DID THIS….WELL ILL BE IN TRUBLEH ….BUT IT IS WORTH IT!!!

  457. MissClandestine
    Posted April 10, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    Although I myself thoroughly enjoyed the Twilight saga, I find your list extremely amusing and will not proceed to make childish threats because you insulted something I like. As you said in your list, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It would be ridiculous to think by threatening or insulting someone in return that it’s going to make any difference to anyone’s opinion (well only their opinion of yourself, because afterwards, everyone’s going to think you’re just some Twilight-obsessed teenie without an actual life or properly functioning mind.)

  458. Nichole (:
    Posted April 10, 2009 at 7:26 pm

    Twlight is a digusting book and a terrible movie. Even people who haven’t read the book wouldn’t understand what in the hell is happening in the movie. The author has to get some writing skills because she clearly, sucks. Bella, weak and scrawny. Edward, gay and just plain stupid. “Night in shining armor” type of crap. Twlight sucks and so do the fans.

  459. isteyp
    Posted April 10, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    i like reading the book and adore the characters but the 95 reasons is just hilarious XD fans shouldn’t take this seriously since taste in book is a matter of opinion XD lolz. good work, mate.

  460. Billy Mays
    Posted April 11, 2009 at 5:11 am

    Billy Mays approves of this message

  461. DrRandy
    Posted April 11, 2009 at 6:00 am

    I keep wanting to clobber the Twilight fangirls with my leatherbound copy of Stoker’s /Dracula/, shouting “THIS IS HOW YOU DO VAMIPRES!” Then I want to shove a copy of Charlaine Harris’ /Dead Until Dark/ into their hands – THAT’S how you do vamps and weres in the same book!

    Crazy fen make me all stabbity…

    SMeyer SAYS her Mormonism has nothing to do with the books – but her protagonist is a completely subservient female who has met her “fated” soulmate. Sounds Mormon to me.

  462. Iris
    Posted April 11, 2009 at 11:21 am

    Why is Edward a nice vampire?
    I think the series would be a heck of a lot better if the cullens were evil. And junkies. That’d be hilarious.
    Stephanie Meyer isn’t a very good writer. She only lobs in the occasional unpronouncable word.

  463. AshleighTheWolfchild
    Posted April 11, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    THis book was so stupid.
    The second you say “Twilight sucks” you have a angry mob of Edwars loving freaks at your feet saying “DONT MAKE ME SEND THE VOTURI ON YOU!”, who the hell is the volturi???

  464. Bright_eyes
    Posted April 11, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    AshleighTheWolfchild: vampire enforcers, roughly.
    I respect you for voicing your opinion, but I really liked this series while I agree with some of your views.
    (by the way: I do know that there will never be a real life Edward)

  465. Vanna
    Posted April 12, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    Okay, so I’m not some die hard Twilight fan. But, I do love the books. I think that Meyer did a great job. Besides, no matter what you say, Meyer is still getting rich and still has fans. Half of your “points” dont even makes sense. Half of them contradict eachother. And I spell very well and use correct grammar. And whats with the sex thing? You must be one of those mindless morons that thinks that sex makes everything better. That’s why movies always have so many sex scenes, because of idiots like you. This is why there are so many pregnant girls, people think that sex is just a parkt of life. The book didn’t have sex in it, DEAL WITH IT. And Edward and Bella do eventually have sex, Meyer just doesnt elaborate on it.

  466. julia
    Posted April 12, 2009 at 10:43 pm

    its stupid to get so worked up over opinions.
    i was all but peeing myself the whole time i read this. ;) funny.

    its obvious she isn’t serious, people. good lord.

  467. Kasya
    Posted April 13, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    I LOVED Twilight. But reading through this was semi entertaining. You did however, use the same points multiple times and some were quite ludicrous.
    These things basically appear on the internet for any series that becomes a movie. I believe there was a few about Harry Potter somewhere. I’m sure these lists will dwindle shortly, just like the HP ones did. Also, trying to say that the world is going to end for those waiting for their Edward, the same thing happens for girls with their prince charming. Yet, they will grow up and move on.
    For those people that love Twilight and are upset about this, move on. As goes for those who hate Twilight. Like someone said before, it’s the internet. If you don’t like the oppinions expressed, close it.

  468. Babii gurl
    Posted April 13, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    LOL i loved it

  469. Maddie
    Posted April 13, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    Haha. I loved this! It was hilarious. I actually like the series [ dont ask me why. ]amd i agree with all of this. ALL OF IT. Especially 84. So true. And the one about Harry Potter being much better. I have countless discussions a day about that with crazy Twilighters.

  470. Amanda
    Posted April 13, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    … … ….. shut up. =/

  471. Lilly
    Posted April 13, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    what happened to your imagination?

    stephenie meyer is an amazing writer and storyteller, so just get over it. jealous much?

  472. Karitt0
    Posted April 13, 2009 at 9:06 pm

    Loved this!!! I haven’t read the books YET, I guess I will just to have an informed opinion, BUT if the movie is the reflection of the greatness of the book… well…
    If we talk about vampire stories written within the las 5 years, I would rather watch True Blood ^^

  473. Nicholas
    Posted April 13, 2009 at 10:20 pm

    I love how all these people are getting mad at you for voicing your opinion. Honestly Dracula could kick edwards butt any day should also be on there. And people chill dont tell this person they need to grow up, when your the ones getting mad and yelling at them for having an opinion.

    Also if i had the time i would do the same thing, they just didn’t like the book and they gave 95 reasons why, there’s those people who love it why dont you come up with 95 reasons why you love it instead of hatting on this person :D

    kthanksbye

  474. Terra
    Posted April 13, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    You know what, I still can’t believe you guys thought of all those reasons! Because you know what? TWILIGHT SUCKS!!!!!!!!!! AND THOSE OTHERS WHO SAY THAT EDWARD IS THE MOST PERFECT GUY ON EARTH, YOU’RE WRONG ‘CAUSE HE’S FICTIONAL!!!!

    WAKE UP!! I seriously love this list. Am I allowed to put it into my newest fan fiction?

  475. Maddy
    Posted April 13, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    I actually enjoyed reading the book, but after a few times I agree with a lot of the items there. And I HATE how now it’s this huge media frenzy and girls are all obsessed over Edward Cullen. GET OVER IT LADIES, the man you fall for with not be a vampire and he will NOT be “perfect”. Everyone has flaws, and I feel bad for the man the obsessed twilight fans fall for because they’re gonna have a huge standard to meet. Oh, and Bella is an annoying, selfish brat who doesn’t even enjoy the fact that she has a sexy vampire and a pretty damn cool life. But I like the way it was written and I do love the story line, but I wish it was a little better :)

  476. Hannah
    Posted April 14, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    HAHAHAHAHAHA
    I COMPLETELY agree. I made a few lists myself of specific reasons WHY Twilight sucks. Just so I had something else to do while every other stupid teenage girl was gushing about how “amazing” it is.

  477. Pie-eater
    Posted April 14, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    To all you fans that Love this book Screw you i never read this book but watched the movie there is nothing bad about vampires and they sparkle in the sun they cant die unless you rip their heads out… and pretty much the Movie gives it all away nothing really else… and WE HAVE A LIFE WE DONT DRESS UP AS DOUCHE BAG VAMPIRES WANNA-BE’S and act all cool id rather Read something like Spiderwick Chronicals that has more Action(really) than twilight and why would you even look at this if you love The book?

  478. piah
    Posted April 15, 2009 at 12:08 am

    who cares?
    hahahahaah
    everybody has a edward cullen!

  479. Meg
    Posted April 15, 2009 at 10:07 am

    I’m not a big fan of the books either, but really this list could’ve been 15 things. Your reasons were often redundant or completely insubstantial. If you want to criticize something, try to sound more intelligent than what you’re criticizing.

  480. Wouldn't you like to know
    Posted April 15, 2009 at 11:47 am

    I love this list. ^_^

  481. Jen
    Posted April 15, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    This entire list was an epic win, and I agree 100%.

  482. Hutchy
    Posted April 15, 2009 at 10:03 pm

    I couldn’t stand the series. I read the first two books when they came out and never bothered touching the other two… though I hear Meyer saved all the particularly lolful stuff for the latter installments. As a writer, I’m kind of insulted that something so badly written was published, let alone fawned over.

  483. Smiling Silently
    Posted April 16, 2009 at 2:01 am

    I am a reader of Twilight and while I do enjoy the books of the series. I TOTALLY give you kudos on the ability to nitpick TWILIGHT’s every flaw. That was dire sarcasm by the way.
    Every book has it’s flaws.
    Even though Twilight produces a newly-dressed but common plot, it does not mean it is not enjoyable for other people. Every author has their style and every person has their reading level. If you are a person of a higher level of reading and are into complex plots and literary works, then yes, I would not recommend Twilight as a read. But simplicity has it’s own beauty in my opinion. I’ll admit it is a nice, simple book that pleases me and I don’t mind taking a break from more advanced literary works to chill out and read it.

    Despite everything, I laughed a lot with this list as it pointed out things I didn’t notice before. I frowned at some and laughed at others. For that I do give you real kudos. Haha, keep up the good work but keep in mind that while you are entitled to your opinions, we are also entitled to ours.
    I like to think that Twilight fans should be able to laugh at ourselves a little bit because, all in all, Twilight is just catering to our every fangirl wish and I don’t see why we should be ashamed to indulge like that. Lighten up everyone, there’s a little humour in everything we do.

  484. Smiling Silently (Take 2)
    Posted April 16, 2009 at 2:10 am

    I forgot to add one last thing onto my post. Whoops!

    There are some people who, I admit, do take it in all too seriously, but there are a few people like myself that like to indulge a little bit and laugh at the book’s and our own expense because really? What else would we do?

    Keep writing lists in anycase, I need my laughs in the morning.

  485. nillee
    Posted April 16, 2009 at 3:15 am

    hahas, i love this and i actually finished all 95, considering i am not very persistant when it comes to such things, and am quoting it (:

  486. meh
    Posted April 16, 2009 at 8:55 am

    I have read somewhere before that reading about the other vampire’s pasts would have been better than the romance- I just think that writing in first person isn’t the done thing anymore.
    If the series was written in 3rd person we wouldn’t have to put up with Bella saying how many holes she has and how beautiful Edward is, every other paragraph- we would read the action and have a slight insight into all of the character’s heads instead of just one main. The fact that we would only here Bella’s thoughts in first person, is sort of tried to be made up for with Edward reading minds, and the werewolf pack too.
    Other than that, it’s too dialoguey in between Bella’s whinging and aweing of Edward, to try to compensate for long periods of thought.

    I read it fort he sake of reading it- when you reread a BOOK, you’re supposed to find something else new in it. doesn’t happen with Twilight- oh actually, I stand corrected! You find another reason to add onto the list above!

    the themes are thrown in for dramatic purposes that are never fulfilled- there’s superficial use of suicide and drugs
    at least harry potter series uses these properly- like potions as substance abuse and calling someone mudblood as racism etc

  487. mad twilight fan
    Posted April 16, 2009 at 10:52 am

    who ever hate twilight are freaks twilight is the best !!! edward is very hot and bella is cool,erm me and my sis had a very emotional cry at this so all you haters are freaks

  488. Wouldn't you like to know
    Posted April 16, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    Well, you are living up to your name–’mad Twilight fan.’

    Just because someone hates/dislikes something does not make them freaks. I’m sorry you and your sister are so sensitive, but I have to remind you–anything you like, there is someone out there who hates it. It’s a fact of life.

    A book is not good simply because its characters are ‘hot.’ That, to be frank, is quite shallow and means you honestly do not know what a good book is, if that is how you judge a ‘good’ book from a ‘bad’ book.

  489. A Twifan Apologist
    Posted April 16, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    To be honest, I love the books. That may be though, because I recognize and appreciate them for the nonsense that they are and am old enough to know that a sparkly stalker is not fantasy material, even if Edward is totally a VILF. I don’t Bella was quite as one dimensional as you made out but point taken, and I wish characters like Jasper and Alice had been developed more, they did seem very interesting.

    I did love the classic chick lit style and cut and dry happy endings – isn’t that what it was written for? Definitely not Kundera or even Kinsella, but cute enough :)

    Not all Twifans are abusive, violent or ignorant!!! But we apologise for those who are

  490. smileyface
    Posted April 16, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    really, u lot are sad sad people. u lot want to hate twilight becos it was a big success and there were lots of fans but u just wanna be different just to be cool, or i dunno, maybe u want to think you are better than most people. but well, watever what makes u happy haters!

  491. Wouldn't you like to know
    Posted April 16, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    Smileyface … you are a typical fangirl (horrible spelling, accusing us of hating Twilight just because of its success, fudge like that) and it makes me very sad. I don’t care one iota that it was a big success or that it has a lot of fans. I care about the horrible writing style, the ’sparklepires’ (they are not real vampires) the bad messages it is giving teenage girls-and they are believing-and such.

  492. Karlee
    Posted April 17, 2009 at 9:38 am

    OMG HOW DO YOU HATE TWILIGHT IT IS THE BEST MOVIE EVER!!!!!!!!!!!! I CAN’T WAIT TO SEE THE NEXT MOVIE…SO WHAT IF THEY MAKE BELLA CLUMSY IT DOES NOT MATTER!!!!!!!!!! LIKE COME ON!!! AND WOULN’T YOU KNOW…NO DUA THAT THEY ARE NOT REAL VANPIRERS!!!!!!!! IT DORS NOT MATTER!!! WHAT MATTERS IN THAT MOVIE IS THE LOVE BETWEEN BELLA AND EDWARD!!!!!!!!! SO DO NOT EVER SAY THAT TWILIGHT IS A BAD MOVIE!!!!!!!!!!! EVERRRRRRR!!!!!!!

  493. Wouldn't you like to know
    Posted April 17, 2009 at 11:58 am

    Twilight is a bad movie.

  494. Tessa
    Posted April 18, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    Last time I checked, vampire and sex weren’t synonyms.
    It definitely makes sense how you say he has no flaws in 11. and then point one out in 19.

  495. TBTF
    Posted April 18, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    You forgot the most important point- Twilight is essentally Buffy The Vampire Slayer for brainless pre-teen girls who feel threatened by strong females and want non-sexually threatening guys to drool over.

    Please kids; watch Buffy, read LJ Smith’s novels and stop dreaming about ‘White Knights’… Why should you wait for a guy to come into your life to ’save you’ from boredom?

  496. KATE
    Posted April 18, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    Some of these posts are incredibly immature. No one is going to take Twitards seriously. They can’t even form a proper sentence, and their arguments are all the same. ” You’re just jealous!” Blah blah.
    The Twilight series is terrible. We all have our opinions, and you don’t need to go rabid over a badly written book.

  497. A
    Posted April 18, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Butthurt fan girls, lol.

  498. Emily
    Posted April 18, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    IMMATURE.

  499. AMANDA
    Posted April 18, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    Clearly EVERYBODY has their own opinions. I am not a ” twilight ” fan , but i did enjoy the books. Just cause it was a good read ” to pass time ” !! tough some of things written on the list is true and very CORRECT. I still enjoyed the book , though i know IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN , MEYER has quite an imagination. CLEARLY if she was a ” BAD ” author as you say. The books would not have been published and she wouldn’t be “RICH” off such “HORRIBLE BOOKS” ..

    one i don’t know, what there is to be JEALOUS of, many people can become creative and create such books like the TWILIGHT SERIES.

    i find it very funny for those ” unforuntiate Girls ” who are madly INLOVE with such a false “FLAWLESS CHARACTER” who will never exist in this generation , or ANY generation to be EXACT! ..

    Sorry TWIFANS. on that part.

    But. overall, i still enjoyed the read (Y)

  500. interesting
    Posted April 18, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    well ok. some are true.

    and some are COMPLETELY STUPID
    and some are REPEATS

    so technically there isnt really 95 reasons why to hate it, because repeating doesnt count (y)

  501. blueirony
    Posted April 18, 2009 at 9:47 pm

    I’m 18 years old. I’m female. I’m sick of Twilight. I’m sick of Edward Bloody Cullen. I’m sick of screaming fan girls. I’m sick of screaming fan girls who are in love with a fictional vampire who SPARKLES (???) and resort to death threats when people tell them the truth about the “works of art” that these books supposedly are.

    The books, put simply, SUCK. There really is no other way to say it.

    Thank you for writing this. I agree with you 100%. I just wish more people did.

  502. pleaselistentoreason
    Posted April 19, 2009 at 12:15 am

    First of all, i’ve never read the books but i do have a rather hostile outlook on them due to the fact half the girls i know are frakking twilight-junkies…it’s scary, but anyways if this person wants to put down 95 resons it sucks in their opinion shouldn’t you let them say their opinion because you have said your’s? It’s just someone putting their opinion up so if you hate it why not make a diffrent 95 reasons why it’s good?

  503. hp fan
    Posted April 19, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    i totaly agree with everything u said. with one exception. Martin Luther was an antisemite (jew hater), so i dont take his oppinions to heart very often. i know, i know, he lead the protestant reformation and stuff, but he was still a racist.

    and TWILIGT SUCKS!!!! no plot whatsoever!

  504. AM(:
    Posted April 19, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    Um I AGREE COMPLETELY!
    The books were completely pointless and the biggest waste of my time.

  505. Envy
    Posted April 19, 2009 at 6:47 pm

    LOL. super powers from reading.
    the book was OKAY. but i noticed it did get annoying, and yes, some guys read twilight lol

  506. Izzy
    Posted April 19, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    Could YOU write a best selling novel?

  507. Envy
    Posted April 19, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    yes i could izzy, if i had powers like alice, see, i knew you were gonna write that.

    lol. stupid book

  508. Katie
    Posted April 20, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    the difference between fiction and reality, is that fiction has to make sense. Some one should tell that to S. Meyer……

  509. ...
    Posted April 20, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    i only read the first book….and it wasn’t terrible…but a fluffy teen romance novel should be limited to under 300 pages.

  510. Hermione > Bella
    Posted April 20, 2009 at 11:44 pm

    I was “Agree, Agree, Agree” the whole way though! That was great =]
    I especially liked “People say that Twilight is better than Harry Potter. Guess what? WRONG.” – I am a big Harry Potter fan!
    Twilight = Epic Fail!

  511. Hermione > Bella (Take 2)
    Posted April 20, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    *Sorry, I meant to write ‘the whole way through’. I am getting my grammar wrong – please don’t blame me, I don’t feel well!

  512. thisisbull
    Posted April 21, 2009 at 6:05 am

    bull
    this sux
    you guys are dumb
    crappy poo
    little twits

  513. Hermione > Bella (Take 3)
    Posted April 21, 2009 at 6:09 am

    thisisbull, come on! just because we don’t like twilight doesn’t mean we’re twits!

  514. thisisbull2
    Posted April 21, 2009 at 6:11 am

    first of all
    its tru
    you are
    argggghhhhh
    if you guys love harry potter soo much go watch gossip girl
    its 10 times better
    yeah
    go gossip girl

  515. Hermione > Bella (Take 4)
    Posted April 21, 2009 at 6:14 am

    What’s Gossip Girl got to with Harry Potter or Twilight? Not every Anti-Twilighter here loves Harry Potter, I’m sure. Come to think of it, Harry Potter didn’t really have much to do with that list in the first place – but seriously!

  516. thisisbull3
    Posted April 21, 2009 at 6:19 am

    GOSSIP GIRL IS THE BEST
    people
    loook inside your brains
    we are meant to be talking about gossip girl
    not some stupid twilight crap and litter
    where are your brains?
    oh, i know
    down the toilet
    and soon to be your face down there as well
    if we dont change this gossip into gossip girls
    people
    WAKE UP!!!!

  517. greenumbrellatree245
    Posted April 21, 2009 at 7:44 am

    AHAHAHA
    omigod, these made me laugh so hard. What’s sad is that I am a Twilight fan, and I’m mostly just laughing at my stupidity after reading these. You have several valid points though, my personal favorite being:

    “If the firs 200 pages of your book relies on the mystery of a character’s identity, don’t slap ‘First, Edward was a vampire’ on the back cover.”

    ROFL thank you for these. Twilight fans shouldn’t be so hardcore, laugh at the books and love em, I’ve learned to do both XDD

  518. Captain Dangle
    Posted April 22, 2009 at 2:36 am

    Twilight is the My Chemical Romance of fiction!!!

  519. ding dong ditch
    Posted April 22, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    only you could think of these reasons not to like this book. Its a book and girls aren’t going to wait for ever to find their Edward Cullen. Have you found your Edward?

  520. Sarah
    Posted April 22, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    haha. i personally am a fan of the series but this is funny. and you guys have a few good points. like
    “If the first 200 pages of your book relies on the mystery of a character’s identity, don’t slap ‘First, Edward was a vampire’ on the back cover.”
    haha. people shouldnt get so damn serious about it.
    so..good job!
    =))

  521. Vanessa
    Posted April 22, 2009 at 8:29 pm

    “Vampires can’t get people pregnant. SPOILER!”

    Yes they can.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_(film)

  522. Jess
    Posted April 23, 2009 at 1:49 am

    Hahahaha! I doubt anyone will read mine since it’s at the very bottom.

    Yeah, I agree with the whole Bella depending too much on Edward but I guess you get that when you read literature from a Mormon. I actually liked Twilight when I first read it, even though I found some of the lines really cheesy.I always wanted to read the next page because of the conversations yet I couldn’t stand how she went on and on about describing every little detail of Edwards stone face to every little tree trunk covered in moss (We don’t actually care) The plot went no where though and I really started to hate Twilight when all the teenage girl fans arrived and had nothing else to talk about at lunch time.

    What really angers me is WHY THE HELL do they have to turn every damn book into a damn movie now a days. Why can’t people apply their imaginations? That’s what makes novels so precious or there’s actually no reason in reading them if you going to ruin it all and watch the movie instead.

  523. alex
    Posted April 23, 2009 at 2:31 am

    Nice list. Mostly spot on. And while I know that some of you will disagree, I personally found Twilight rather twisted. I mean, since when has blood that smells like it would taste nice been the basis of any relationship? And stalker much, in essence telling Bella sleeps pretty? The premise would have worked better if it was meant to be messed up. The almost religious fanaticisim that this book instils in its fans is demonstrated by one of my fried’s ex. She told him that she wanted to have two kids; a boy named Edward and a girl named Bella, named after a chronically depressed emo and her sparkly vampire boyfriend… I rest my case

  524. Crystal♥
    Posted April 24, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    EPIC WIN! Hahaha. Have you read this: http://twilightsucks.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=fangirls&action=display&thread=5175

    That would give you more reasons to hate Twilight.

  525. Alice
    Posted April 24, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    I couldn’t stop laughing, all of it true.

    The whole vampire falls for human girl and saves her and has a baby (or so I’ve heard, no clue is the baby is true) is so… 7th grade-9th grade teen girl angst late night writings of their long desires.

  526. Ash
    Posted April 25, 2009 at 9:14 am

    I completely agree!

    Read Anne Rice, THOSE are vampires.

    The Twilight vampires are a laughing stock…
    what sort of vampire doesn’t DRINK BLOOD, LUST OBSESSIVELY, and HAVE MALICIOUS INTENT?!

    seriously, people.

  527. Ainsley
    Posted April 25, 2009 at 11:24 am

    I have enjoyed reading the books and agree with a select few of the things tha thave been said (for instance, the ‘baby’ writting and bad use of adjectives). And I am also very happy that, once readng through the entire list, I came across “You are allowed to have your own opinion, just like we are allowed to have ours. Get over it. Twilight fans don’t seem to understand that though and attack at the mention of flaw in the book.”

    I agree. We are all allowed to have and state our opinions. My opinion is that it is a good book in the fact that it has attracted so many people and fans. It was a page turner, though you may say only because you wanted to hear more ‘lameness’.

    The major problem I have with the book is that it was written for intelligent people. Don’t get me wrong here. It was poorly written, but the plot was meant for people with developed brains. The fan girls who have come to love Edward should do just that. If they want to waste their life waiting for him… well that just tells me that they were mentally unprepared to read Twilight.

    Some other things I don’t like are the sequels. Twilight was a fairly good book until the Baseball scene. I didn’t care for the James/Victoria nonsense. New Moon was annoying becuase she was sulking throughout the entire book. Eclipse and Breaking Dawn were quite revolting. Yet I read them. And from what you have said, so did you. That is the power of the series. Though you may not have realised it, it drew you in, if only barely. You kept reading becuase some aprt of you wanted to know what would happen. Of course, you might have wanted to know just so you could write this. But it did it’s job.

    I enjoyed reading your list, though I would like to point out that there are quite a few times where you repeat yourself (if I were writing this, I would have done that to emulate the repetitivness of the series itself). There are also a few comments that have nothing to do with why you shouldn’t read Twilight. As a whole, I think you SHOULD read Twilight, not becuase it is compleling (which it isn’t at all times) or becuase it is written well (which it isn’t) or becuase everyone else is doing it. No, you should read it becuase it will allow you to view the style of many authors. You can take what you read and apply it to your own writing, and even your conversation and beliefs. You learn what you hate about certain books, and what you like.

    On that note, I leave one question that bothered me the entire time I read the book: What happens when Bella is having her period? If Edward can’t resist her blood, then they have a problem.

  528. Hmm...
    Posted April 26, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    FINALLY!! Someone who hates the book as much as I do…
    I wasn’t even able to finish the first book, I hated Bella way to much…she’s a disgrace to women everywhere!! I hate her and her guts..
    It amazes me how the girls at my school die over this series…ugh everywhere I turn I see another stupid cover/title which by the way never has anything to do with the book..
    You’re right, Stephanie Myer does right like an amateur and it sickens me…
    Furthermore you’re right…this also led to me hating the book… In the book.. did Stephanie Myer not say that Bella was plain, clumsy and ugly? Well… that’s what I remembered or maybe that’s just what I interpreted whatever she said as… but anyway if this is so… why were all the guys dying over her? Edward Jacob…the other dude from school? Really? Be realistic here..

  529. Cat
    Posted April 26, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    I think its funny that you kept talking about how Meyers isn’t original, and kept repeating herself, when you did the same exact thing writing this list. If you are going to write a list, at least make valid points, other than that girls will stop liking boys because they aren’t Edward. I liked the books, and oddly enough I am not waiting for a sexy vampire to come sweep me off my feet. I also think its funny that you had to go to random people on the street just to make a longer list, to make it seem more impressive.

  530. Mai
    Posted April 26, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    i love twilight, but you are so right….

  531. love twilight
    Posted April 26, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    oh my god you really dont have a life dont you?? jajajaja 95 excuses why you dont like twilight? LAME and by the way twilight is the best book ever! and stephenie is an awesome writer too , who the heck is steph king??? jaja i gotta admit some excuses are right but who cares?? twilight is so good!
    by! love twilight !!

  532. Sasha
    Posted April 28, 2009 at 8:05 am

    You could have written more!

    Seriously…

  533. Jess
    Posted April 28, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    …Okay, to the Twitard with the name ‘love twilight’…you seriously have no idea who Stephen King is? Wow, have you been living in a little bubble your entire life? Seriously?

  534. Brittany
    Posted April 28, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    I think the people criticizing you for having “stupid” reasons are stupid themselves. Most of the reasons you mentioned were purely meant to be looked act as satire, but several others can be seen as absolute truth. I’m sick of people getting butthurt because people are expressing their dislike for Twilight; even if it’s “just a book”, we still have the right to express our feelings on it, regardless if it’s not that serious or not. And fans, grow up. Not everyone was brainwashed into believing that Twilight is a wonderful series. (And by the way: TWILIGHT IS NOT A SAGA, IT IS A SERIES. GET IT RIGHT PEOPLE.)

  535. twilightxoxo
    Posted April 29, 2009 at 4:43 am

    most of the reasons are totally nonsense. there’s no book that’s good for everyone. each one has their own likes and dislikes. it’s just a book, if you don’t like it then read another one. there’s no need to make a very long list of why you hate it and telling others that they shouldn’t read it. please…not everyone hates it as much as you do!

  536. kate902
    Posted April 29, 2009 at 4:56 am

    if she used the word “fangs” in the story then it’s like saying “sleeping in coffins”. it was mentioned several times in ms. meyer’s interviews that her vampires are not like the legendary one’s. apparently it means that they are different from the vampires you think.

  537. Dead man dancin
    Posted April 29, 2009 at 5:33 am

    Just to make my pint absolutley clear if she writes that her vvampires are differetn to “the legendary ones” first of all does that mean she thinks these aren’t legendary then does that mean she thinks they are real? And secondly don’t call them vampires then!

  538. ME!
    Posted April 29, 2009 at 8:20 am

    I hate this book

  539. :]
    Posted April 29, 2009 at 8:23 am

    SO DO I!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  540. ChristyG
    Posted April 29, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    Smiling Silently…I couldn’t have said it better myself!

  541. Jaz
    Posted April 29, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    i hate twlight!

    shhhhffeeet!

  542. KT
    Posted April 29, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    i love twilight its anwesome book and most of the peolple that posted commenst on this website havent even read it so how can u hate something u havnt even read???
    i think that everyone that hates twilight so much needs to get a LIFE!

  543. tSlefh
    Posted April 29, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    52. Do any guys actually like Twilight?

    I do, actually (and I’m a guy). Unfortunately, that means nothing. I’ve trained myself to ignore terrible plots and bad grammar in order to enjoy a terrible story that gets embellished in my own brain. Hell, I read fanfiction. Like, bad fanfiction. Yeah. I agree with this post, even though I love Twlight.

    Bella/Edward forever.

  544. tSlefh
    Posted April 29, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    Also, disputing #27 : Supposedly Meyer never uses the word ‘said’ in the entire first book, instead using breath.

    “I’m glad you like it,” Charlie _said_ gruffly, embarrassed again.” (bottom of page 8, if you’re interested)

    Just a blatant lie. Good job.

  545. Random Guy
    Posted April 30, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    I agree with you that this book is horrid and a bane to human kind, but if you are giving reason not to read the book you can’t use the same reason multiple times. Just like you argued that we know Edward is perfect after the 4th time being told you can’t use that argument 2 or 3 times, it is the same with the argument that he sparkles.

  546. karissa
    Posted April 30, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    All written is spot on. Stephenie Meyer is a terrible story teller. Sparkling vampires? C’mon. But I’m positive she knew this will be a teeny hit. Never mind the characters will dull personalities, and excruciating predictable bad plot as long as it will titillate every teenage girls fantasies. Obviously, she just wants to get rich.

  547. Sherry
    Posted May 1, 2009 at 1:46 am

    Agreed! I wrote exactly like Meyer when I was 12. As for the “love,” it took me a lot of years to realize that my marriage was not a Sweet Dreams romance and that sometimes my hubby can be a total dickface. Like any real man in any real relationship. This kind of crap just further warps our Disney-fed girls into unrealistic expectations. That’s my real fear here.

  548. Down With Twilight
    Posted May 1, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    http://www.yudu.com/embed/library_item/56242

    See the investigational report above on why Twilight needs to be banished!

  549. Anonymous
    Posted May 2, 2009 at 9:35 am

    Now, see, I agree with all your reasons, but I disagree with your conclusion. Your conclusion is that Twilight is bad. Nothing is objectively bad. Actually, you know what, by that logic, you’re right. Twilight is bad. It’s also good. It’s also horrible, great, average, and anything else a book could ever be, because book quality is a subjective variable that cannot be irrefutably determined. Twilight’s quality, and, for that matter, any quality, is a metaphorical superposition caused by multitudes of opinions. But it’s not objectively bad; it’s SUBjectively bad, and that’s why it can also be good without contradiction. So essentially, if these reasons denote a bad book to you, then don’t read Twilight, because it sucks. If you like the sound of these reasons, go ahead and read it, because it’s amazing.

  550. hp fan
    Posted May 2, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    first of all twilight SUCKS and if the 95 reasons obove aren’t enugh to prove it to u, just follow this link to my

    bloghttp://www.classblogmeister.com/blog.php?blogger_id=225819&new_display_count=1000
    (u might need to copy and paste)

    and HARRY POTTER FOR THE WIN!!

  551. hp fan
    Posted May 2, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    if u want to ask me why hp rulz, ill tell u. it has one of the most intricit web of charicters i have ever seen. not only that but you could tell all sorts of things about the plot. like severus snape re-written looks like “pursues evens” (spoiler) and voldemorts wand is yew, which in mythology represents imortality. and malfoy means bad faith in french. and on and on and on….

    does twilight have that? NO!!!!

  552. sera
    Posted May 3, 2009 at 12:34 am

    twilight is one of the worst books ever written i agree with all of the reasons to hate twilight from 1-95.

  553. ????
    Posted May 3, 2009 at 12:44 am

    ummm if you hate “The Twilight Saga” so much why would you write 95 reasons about the book??????

  554. emma
    Posted May 3, 2009 at 12:48 am

    i am a twilight fan,
    although i am not one of the crazy,
    stupid ones.
    but i am agreeing with nearly
    everything you are saying.

    but i also think that people who hate twilight
    with such a passion don’t truly hate the books
    as much as they say,
    they may just not enjoy them and are annoyed
    by the fact that all this hype has come from
    these books when other, more skilled litriture is
    not as famous as this.

  555. Clarissa
    Posted May 3, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    ha ha This is so hilarious…I really liked the book until I read this and now I notice all the things you said and your totally right!! ha ha

  556. Bianca
    Posted May 3, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    OMG, I absolutely love these reasons xD I agree with almost everything. Good job!

    And yeah…I’m a Twilight fan LOL xD.

  557. love twilight
    Posted May 4, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    SHOOT YOU!!!!twilight is the best book and movie!!!!!

  558. I HATE TWILIGHT :D
    Posted May 5, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    umm to the person named love twilight….
    tell me where you live so i can kill you…
    you have no reason to live talking about this nonsense. Twilight is crap. The twilight movie is also… crap. And you my friend..
    are the cousin of… you guessed it! CRAP!

  559. nel
    Posted May 5, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    I agree on almost all of the reasons, especially #10 and #65.

    In my point of view, there are a lot of fans of Twilight and EDWARD because (1)everyone seems to be into it and others don’t want to be out-dated or behind; (2)Robert Pattinson, an eye-catcher guy, played Edward’s part; and (3)it’s made for teens and teens don’t really mind reading between the lines, all they care about is the “ROMANCE” part of the book.

    I don’t really like Twilight. :/

  560. D.woods
    Posted May 5, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    i posted this in a bulletin on myspace and everyone told me to send it to you, so I am. It wasn’t ment to start anything at all. I like hearing what people think. I’m not one of the freaks who will try to kill you, promise. I liked twilight when I read it, just don’t really like the hype that comes with it. It’s gotten just a little out of hand. Just remember that when and if you read it(:

    Okay so my sister sent me this website, and I thought it was quite funny, so Know myself I decided to defend the people who actually like twilight. The top will be this girl’s opinion, and the bottom will be mine(: if you’d like to read it.. go ahead, if not… I really don’t care. Have fun :D

    Why I Hate Twilight
    by Sarah Rebecca, Mar 19, 2009

    95 reasons why you shouldn’t read Twilight, one of the worst pieces of literature ever written.

    Bella is a perfect character (“Mary Sue”), which Meyer hides by calling her clumsy.
    “Perfect Character” There is no such thing.

    Being clumsy is not a flaw if Edward always catches her.
    Edward doesn’t always catch her, must we go back to the scene in the movie where he drops her at the end? yepp, I’m gunna be a smartass.

    She can’t do anything without Edward.
    She lasted almost a whole book without him…. I’m pretty sure she did anything a normal person would do… Eat, breath, sleep, bathe, think.

    And when he leaves she attempts to commit suicide.
    Plenty of people, have done that, and Plenty of “good” novels have wrote about that, even movies, try wristcutters. AMAZING (:

    Meyer is living out her own fantasies by writing about Bella, who is clearly herself.
    And what is the crime here? Writers do that all the time. People who agree with this are just to sad to imagine doing anything but living their normal lives… how boring.

    The books aren’t well written, just because every other word is a fancy adjective doesn’t make it good writing.
    Well, then what is a good written book persay. There isnt a rubric to decide the perfect style of writiing, that’s why every freakin book is different. &It’s called well written because she uses very good imagry.

    All the rules Meyer sets for being a vampire are broken by the end of the series.
    Like what? I didn’t even know at the beginning there was a whole chapter titled “Thel rules of being a vampire, which also may never be broken”
    Rules are broken all the time, so do even try that one. It happens constantly in those fariytales you were probably oh so fond of when you were a child, like Cinderella for example. She was not nobility and in the middle ages it was a great crime to even talk to someone outside you class.

    Not only that, she breaks rules set by more esteemed authors.
    Hahaha, this one is funny. Once again, there are no rules to writing books.
    Seriously, if there were, we’d all know how a book would end if they all had the same “rules”

    The world population will come to an end because all girls who read this book will think they are Bella and will wait for their Edward to come until they are old. And he’ll never come.
    Females or males who believe that they will find Edward Cullen or a Vampire, I’m sorry, but get over yourselves and just think clearly. You’d be quite dumb to believe that, and I highly doubt that’d happen though.

    Bella almost dies fifty thousand times, but Edward always saves her. This is
    boring.
    Actually it’s interesting, cause you never know if she’s actually gunna die one time.

    Edward is too perfect and has no flaws either. Even vampires should have flaws besides wanting to suck human blood because it’s natural to them.
    He has flaws with the way he sees himself. He thinks he is, a killer, and an awful being that has no soul, and just dies when he dies. His flaw would be his low self esteem.

    The reason the books became so popular is because Bella has no personality and any loser can put themselves in her shoes.
    Not true, it’s cause it is a love story that every girl dreams of. Most best selling books among females are novels written about love.

    If Bella is so ‘plain’, why do so many guys fall for her within the first two chapters?
    Quite possibly, because it is a small town, they’ve dated all the girls or their friends have, and have heard all the storys of the girls. Meaning that they want something new and unknown. I.e. Bella. Also, getting her, would mean that the guy to get her, would have status, that’s way they all try to get to her first.

    Bella teaches women to let the man handle everything, which pretty much is a huge step backward for women everywhere, who have fought for equality.
    Not truely, there are women out there that see, that the men should do everything, while the female worries about him. it’s not abnormal you know.

    Isn’t it convenient that her father always leaves her alone and doesn’t question her? Real parents aren’t that way.
    Hahaha, really. Real parents aren’t that way?! Bahahaha, wow, this person knows nothing of society. Do you not notice how many kids are into drugs, drinking, partying, sex and pregnant. It’s cause parents leave them alone, and don’t question them.

    Lack of character development.
    Uhh, actually many of the characters realize flaws within themselves or change throught the whole series…

    Bella is a useless, whining, doll that suddenly has become the idol for girls everywhere.
    Bella, an idol? No, I’d think not. Many girls veiw her as ugly.

    People say that Twilight is better than Harry Potter. Guess what? WRONG.
    Uhhh, I gotta agree with this one. Harry Potter is the shizz [:

    Edward is extremely possessive, border-line abusive, and boring as anything.
    It’s too cliché.
    Boring? no you never know if he's like gunna get so pissed, not be able to control the possessiveness and anger issues he's got and just lose it, and kill bella. It could happen in all those vampire books you say set "rules". &wouldn't these also be flaws?

    This book contains no real sex, so it’s not really a vampire novel.
    This book was geared towards young readers. You wanna read or see a good sex seen got get penthouse or something, but don't complain about a book that is advertised towards the young ones. Parents are constantly complaining how their children know to much about that kind of stuff at a young age.

    Read Anne Rice - those are vampires, not the girly men that Meyer has created.
    Yeaaa, don't know Rice, but that was her version of vampires. &just because the Rice version of vampires came out 1st doesn't mean that if there were vampires they'd be just like the way they are written about in Rice.

    You don’t have to describe the character every two pages, we know all about Edward’s ‘perfectly toned chest’ the fourth time she mentions it.
    You said you wanted some sex appeal to the book. That's as close as you can get when it's for, oh yea, YOUNG READERS!

    Bella reflects upon herself through the entire novel to tell important plot developments. Hey Meyer, ever heard of "Show, don’t tell"?
    It's a book first of all, so she'd be telling it either way. She just chose Bella to tell it.

    She never uses the word fangs in the entire book series, and it’s supposedly about vampire.
    Just like I said, if vampires are real, how do you know what they'd look like. I could be one at this very moment, and I don't have fangs. There aren't real rules so stop comparing the books. They are two different veiws.

    Her vampires sparkle. Enough said.
    How do you know.... don't even gotta finish.

    Supposedly Meyer never uses the word ‘said’ in the entire first book, instead using breath.
    And you hate this cause?? It's that better writting thing you were talking about.

    There is too much face touching.
    &You don't touch peoples face and real life. Would you rather her not build up the tension by describing the kiss slowly and piece by piece and instead say, Edward leaned forward grab her boob, and made out with Bella. there.

    It’s predictable, and childish.
    So predictable, did you know she was going to have a kid? When Meyer had said it's not possible by one of her rules that you are suposed to go by.

    We read the entire series just to laugh at the stupidity of it.
    Well, it was entertaining wasn't it?? &that is the point of a book. &I bet you bought them, which ment Meyer got your money... now let's see who's the dumb one, & you doing this thing, just made her popularity go up, because for the people who haven't read it, they'll want to read it to see if what you say is true. You are quite intellegent, ya know that? [;

    Meyer can’t think of original names. The only original name she used was Rennesme, which is combination of two names and doesn’t count.
    Go read any book about the 1800's, there is atleast one person named Elizabeth, and a male named Henry. Go complain about that.

    Vampires can’t get people pregnant. SPOILER!
    Uhhh, it made the book more interesting thought didn't it. Bet ya didn't see that comeing? Which made it UNpredictable.

    Vampire baseball was just a disgrace.
    A disgrace?!?! No if they ran the bases just like any other baseball team, that would be a disgrace, cause wouldn't that be like.... "Oh, Vampires don't play baseball like a normal human being. They have super strength, and run with amazing grace and quickness. That goes against the rules" sounds about what you'd say.

    People think Meyer is the best writer ever.
    This is false. People that think this have never read another book. But then again, it is their opinion, and they may see her as the best writer they ever read stuff from.

    The plot drags on forever, when it really could have been completed in two books.
    Uhh, Harry Potter? Lemony Snicket series of unforunate events? Star Wars?? Movies and T.v. shows are like that too. I can summarize stuff like that in two sentences.

    Wow, yet another ‘original’ plot of forbidden love.
    Yet you want her to follow the "rules" set by past vampire novels and go off the things they say, which would be UNoriginal. You're not making anysense.

    Why is it called the Twilight Series if only one book is titled Twilight?
    It's called the Twilight Saga. &It's because the series begins at twilight. It's the time that Edward loves most in a day. It's when vampires can be themselves. It's just like the Luxe Series, Only one book is called Luxe. Or even the Clique Series. Only one is called The Clique. Go write 95 things about those books.

    It’s too easy to mock. Go on Youtube, how many mocks on Twilight do you see?
    Anything is easy to mock if you have an imagination. People mock Harry Potter all the time. Harry Pothead.. come on now. &I am also mocking you right now. So what, is that a reason to hate you or your opinion? [which I don't I actually love because I can argue] (:

    They use a drug reference in a book written for ten-year-olds.
    Once again, and you want to put a graphic sex scene in it?! I’d let my child here about drugs before sex.

    Stephanie Meyer creates some interesting characters ie: Jasper and Alice. She then ignores them, and gives them no development.Every Other Facebook bumper sticker is about Twilight/Edward. EVERY OTHER ONE.
    This isn’t true either. Many people say that Alice is there favorite character, and I’d have to say Jasper is my favorite out of the whole book. Even if he isn’t in it much. I bet you love Neville in Harry Potter or even Draco, and it doesn’t revolve around them.

    Fangirls are so blinded by their love for Edward that they don’t realize the book is terrible.
    Your opinion. &So, I’m pretty sure you have a band that has a guy in it that you adore, yet they are awful. Especially if it is Anthony Green. [don't get me started on that one] lol

    Stephen King agrees that Stephanie Meyer can’t write ‘worth a darn’.
    It’s stupid.
    Stephen King’s mind is screwed up. he may think that because she’s getting all the attention instead of his freakish mind and sadistic books. He writes of crazy clowns, houses that live, cell phones and cats, I bet you want a ten year old to read that too.

    Bella.
    uhhhh, you can hate characters because you want to be them… it happens often, don’t worry.

    Bella is Edward’s beard.
    Yeaaaa?

    Meyer wrote four books about nothing, really.
    Well, it’s four more best selling books than you’ll ever write (:

    Straight men sparkle?
    Well, you see, I bet if a vampire were gay… it’d be breaking the rules of vampire writting.

    It’s teeming with grammatical errors.
    So are like ten other books I’ve read this year. It happens all the time. Go read a Jane Austin book… It’ll make your head spin with all the errors.

    Bella Swan means beautiful swan, which is horribly cheesy.
    Okay… there are plenty of oxymorons that are cheesy.

    Edward Cullen is sparkly; crows like sparkly things.
    &You hate the book because you wish even atleast a crow would pay attention to you?

    Do any guys actually like Twilight?
    Uhhh, actually I happen to know that all my guy friends that have read it enjoy it. and you know, even those gay boys like it to read about Edwards sparkly body.

    If the first 200 pages of your book rely on the mystery of a character’s identity, don’t slap “First, Edward was a vampire” on the back cover.
    It wasn’t a mystery though. If you didn’t freakin know, going off the “esteemed writers” previous “rules” on being a vampire, then your a moron. not even gunna apologize either.

    There’s far too little actual conflict in the story. But this probably stems from having a flawless main character.
    The whole actual conflict is that unoriginal forbiden love. We all know about those stories. &there are many conflicts in the story. Such as the volturi, the fact that she lies to her dad, the bestfriend begins to like her, her bestfriend and boyfriend cant stand each other, someone is freakin trying to kill her in one. but no, that’s totally not a conflict if some crazy chick ever trys to take my live from me.

    They fall in love way too quickly and it seems fake because no one falls in love instantly, especially teenagers.
    Oooooooo, well obviously someone should take a class in psychology. Once people are teens, we have the same thought process as an adult. Which means we have all the same feelings as and Adult, meaning we can be in love. The reason love doesn’t work so well when you are a teen though, is because we are going through so many changes of our own.

    They only love each other because she smells good and he’s hot. There’s no other given reason why.
    Goodness, they explain in the book how at first Edward didn’t even smell her, he realize she was the only person whose thoughts he couldn’t hear. &yes of course she is attracted to him because he’s gorgeous, that’s how everyone is on first impressions. We base it of physical appearence. But then later on, they go one and tell other reasons why they do love eachother. Just like anyone else.

    It’s just not healthy to teach young girls that True Love involves the guy watching you while you sleep.
    When you get older and live with someone you “Love” or you are married to, there are times when you loved one watches you while you sleep. I mean when I first read it I was thinking freak, and don’t really plan on having my boyfriend come in to my room at night to watch me sleep. Besides he never slept, it gave him something to do ;p

    Edward is HOT. We get it.
    Not everyone thinks that. &People in the paper and tabloids always talk about how hot a guy or girl is for that week. Go complain about that, while your at it.

    She had only been in Forks for a month when Edward had been watching her sleep for two months.
    Where did we get this bit of information? &If you really looked into it that hard, you have no life.

    There’s something disturbing about Carlisle turning only teenagers into vampires.
    He didn’t turn only teenagers into vampires. He’s got his wife who is what, 23? & he only turned Edward and Rosalie into vampires. Edward because he promised his mother he’d watch over him, and Rosalie as a mate for Edward. Rosalie found Emette and turned him. &Alice and Jasper found Carlisle together, while they were already vampires.

    All Twilight fans are insane, proved by several responses to criticism such as…
    “What is your name, address and phone number, just so that i can track you down ank kill You with my super awesom vampire powers THAT I AQUIRED FROM READING THE SERIES!!!!!!!!!!”
    That is acutally quite funny.

    And this…
    “do you WANT a cult of angry twilight luvers like mysef at your doorstep at night trying to behead you????? you shouldnt voice an absurd oppinion like this on the internet.”
    It’s your fault for posting stuff like this.

    And this…
    “you must have not read much good litterature in youre life, because if you cannot appreciate the quality of this art…..YOU ARE MENTALLY UNSOUND!!!!!!!”
    Post anything like you did about Twilight, but instead for Harry Potter, X-MEN, Star wars… you’ll get the same replys.

    Isn’t funny how Twilight fans can’t spell and use proper capitalization? By the way, 61, 62, and 63 are real quotes.
    They are just so enraged. they’re insane… what can you say.

    The reason Edward can’t read Bella’s mind is because she doesn’t have one.
    Not true, if you get to the end, you find it’s a gift of hers.

    T. Pain would totally win Bella’s heart and beat up Edward because he’s on a boat.
    Hahahaha, WOW this is true xp

    Edward hits on the school faculty to get out of classes.
    Well, ya gotta do, what ya gotta do. that’s all I can tell ya.

    We applaud Stephanie Meyer, as she’s got to be a rich woman by now, having found her forte in the insane cult of teenage girls who go rabid over her writings.
    Like I said, she’s smart, while you were the dumb one who funded her cult (:

    Vampires vs. werewolves (isn’t that a Facebook application and such a original idea?)
    A face book app that prolly came from the Underworld or even this series. &Once again you get on to her for not following the typical stereotype, and the turn around and scold her for do that exact thing.

    There’s nothing worse than a fan girl going insane over a fictional guy. It’s rather pathetic actually, so, um, yeah, get a life and keep reading those books, chickies.
    You read Harry Potter, and you prolly obbsessed over him at a time to when you were young. You’ve prolly had fantasy about that one guy from that one movie you really love. So let’s really try not to be hypacritical.

    This book was not worth the paper on which it was printed.
    Yet once again, you helped fund once upon a time, and are now. You’re not making people not want to read it, your forceing them the other way.

    Bella has no goals and no future, her life revolves around Edward.
    Her goal actually was to become a vampire. & there are plenty of people yet again who’s lives revolve around other people. it’s not some new witchcraft.

    WWJTFD: What Would a Judgmental Twilight Fan Do? Answer: attempt to attack with the ‘cool vampire powers’ they gained from reading the series. Awesome!
    Hahaha, that’s funny, but not a reason to hate twilight. Just a reason to mock other people.

    Even if you like the book, it doesn’t live up to its hype.
    No, the movie didn’t live up to it’s hype. the book does. Unless you don’t like books about vampires that hate wolves, and fall in love with a plain jane girl. Then of course it wouldn’t live up to its hype for you. DONT FREAKIN WASTE TIME AND MONEY READING IT.

    Edward is a good VILF, that’s it.
    Yeaaaa?

    “And I cried numerous times upon realising there would never be an Edward in this world.” – quoted from Almuvira Anona on Yahoo Answers.
    Okayy, that’s just rediculous.

    A hundred years difference = pedophile.
    Yet seventeen, so legally, he’s not one.

    It’s a co-dependent relationship stripped down to the bare essentials. Girl: “I can’t live without you. I want to change myself to be with you.” Boy: “If you leave me, I will kill myself.”
    Okayyy, that is how many teenagers veiw their love life. That’s one way that they connect with the book better than you. You’ve probably never had a love so you take it out on a book that gets more action then you.

    Stephanie Meyer must really be into pedophilia: first Edward and Bella, now Jacob and Renesseme? SPOILER.
    Jacob doesn’t like Renesseme like that yet. He just wants to be like a big brother to her. There is nothing wrong with that. It happens in everyday life. &Soon she’ll catch up to his age at the rate she grows.

    New hot couple name for Bella and Edward = Bedward
    &this pretains to you hating the book how?

    You may think Edward Cullen is smart and fast, but Chuck Norris could take him.
    Once again??

    Bella’s only deep thoughts are, ‘Edward is so perfect. I love him.’
    She has deeper thoughts then that. She thinks of the conflict of her bestfriend that she has love for and how it entertwines with her love for Edward in New Moon. just an example.

    The only reason I kept reading was to see if Bella could redeem herself by getting over him.
    that’s not true because you could’ve skimmed it or waited til the last book to came out and had one of your friends tell you after they’d read it. Admit it, you’re just as crazy over the book, you just don’t like how much hype and how popular it is now. You thought you were independent and “original” then everyone started freaking over it.

    Jacob, who didn’t abuse Bella and was nice to her, was dumped and she chose Edward. Hmm, masochistic much?
    They say that in the freakin book. Obviously. Girls do that all the time now. Teens always go for the bad boy that treats them wrong the first couple of times.

    Ms. Meyer writes the way I did when I was twelve years old, doodling in my journal.
    &you’re just mad you didn’t think to turn it into a book before she did, and get the fame and tons of cash, since you’re a nobody. DERN :/

    “It would have been much better if Jacob and Edward discovered they were gay: no sequels, no whiny Bella. Amen to that.”
    Wow, this one is original. I hear this one for pretty much all books/movies/tv shows. Harry Potter and Draco Malfoy anyone?

    Many people have enjoyed the making of this, many have helped with it too…in other words lots of people hate Twilight.
    Many people hate Pres Bush, hate Obama, hate religion, hate aithiest, hate gays, hate children, hate elderly people, hate wars, hate tree huggers, hate middle eastern people….. you don’t see anything being done. You really expect this one to mean anything to people.

    You are allowed to have your own opinion, just like we are allowed to have ours. Get over it. Twilight fans don’t seem to understand that though and attack at the mention of flaw in the book.
    I enjoy your opinion, I’m just proving you wrong(;

    Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.
    Yea and if they ment anything, I’d know who they are.

    “Cause it’s dumb.” – Random Person on the Street
    If that’s all they could come up with, they couldn’t even read it if they attempted to.

    “It’s annoying as hell.” – Random Person on the Street #2
    Once again, a little better response, but still, not good enough. The hype is annoying though, I will give them that.

    Martin Luther would not have not have approved if the book was written during his lifetime.
    This has nothing to do with it. Martin Luther has to do with the Catholic religion which there probably was much he wouldn’t approve of[not bad mouthing] but he also taught the gospel. And in God’s word, you don’t have to go to church or anything, you just have to know him. &Bella actually believed in heaven if you didn’t catch that and so did Carlisle. So, tell me the wrong in the situation through God’s eyes.

    Harry Potter could beat Edward any day with his magic powers.
    True, very true. He could easily rip him to shreds with his wand and then of course use that wand to start a fire.

    It’s offensive to the entire human race, both male and female.
    Offensive how? When you say that you are also talking of Romeo and Juliet wich of course an “esteemed writer” wrote. &In that story the two kids kill themselves….and we study that in school, yepp that one has a much better moral then two people living happily together forever…

    The book was so bad we wrote 95 reasons why we hate it.
    &Not all of them were actual reasons. Many were just made up randomness….. Bedward for one.

    So, If you read this entire thing. Good for you. I will be posting this in a blog, comment me there if you will. But seriously come on! Those weren’t even all good reasons. I’m not saying everyone sould love TWILIGHT, no. Because I know not everyone does, and I understand that. But atleast have a good reason, don’t contradict yourself and actually have read it. Don’t go around saying you hate it to be different. And don’t go around saying you love it for attention and to have something to talk about. I’ve read it. loved it, but not obssessed. Still gotta have my Harry Potter ;p

    -deanaleewoods
    May 5, 2009

  561. Stephanie
    Posted May 6, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    You’re so right! Don’t listen to what some of the other comments say about none of the reasons being valid; most of them are very good reasons, and the rest are funny! :D

  562. Paula
    Posted May 6, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    you morans, twilight is the best book i ever read. you s***s. how can you say that bella doesn’t have a brain??? shes the best girl in biology for heaven sakes. i think YOU dont have a brain damn it

  563. Richie
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 10:47 pm

    Reads like a formula Mills & Boon with two-dimensional characters. Loner pretty girl meets loner strong handsome guy. Only their love for each other can save them, like codepenant drug-addict trash. The superficiality of it all makes me wanna puke, almost as much as the attention it gets. Litterary slop from the gutter.

  564. Hermione Granger
    Posted May 8, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    lol
    totally true
    twilight is a waste of time to read
    harry potter isn’t
    harry potter would bet twilight any day
    twilight’s book really sucks but who’s Anne Rice??

  565. Light Yagami
    Posted May 8, 2009 at 11:48 pm

    I hated the whole series and everything about twilight. It’s seriously gay and annoying how it’s everywhere. Once I was driving around my town when I saw a car with the bumper sticker saying, “got twilight?” and I laughed at the sight of an obsessed freak of nature. I hate twilight and amen to all that you said.

  566. Nynke
    Posted May 9, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    I especially agree with reason number five.

  567. Teska
    Posted May 10, 2009 at 5:33 am

    I totally agree with you. I read a lot of books, I’m basically a biblioholic (a biblioholic is someone that has an obsession with books) and I have read quite literally 100 books that are soooo much better than the Twilight series. I wish that people would get over it. One of my friends saw these two girls at that thingy in geelong were you could meet the people that play Laurant (I think that’s how you spell it) and Emmet and get their autograph it cost $30 dollars!!! Anyway the two girls started hyperventilating and had to be taken out of the line and when they had calmed down they got back in the line and when the got to them they jumped over the barrier and ran at them screaming. OMG get a life!!!!

    -Teska

  568. Katie
    Posted May 10, 2009 at 6:44 am

    Jees your more moaney and wingy than bella.

    Harry Potter sucked ass and so did twilight especially the last book, get over it. Why don’t you vent some of your rage and energies in to something productive like creating some descent literature.

    There are far too many lazy critics in world all they are good for is a moan.

  569. cl
    Posted May 11, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    I agree with you completely. I actually kind of liked the first book despite all the flaws until I read the second one.

  570. hp fan
    Posted May 11, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    katie, hp is the best book ever. it has one of the best developed plots i have ever seen (and i have read A LOT of books, good and bad) and although i am definitely a critic, I AM TRYING TO WRITE A BOOK!!

  571. JJ Twilight Freak
    Posted May 12, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    You know what I have to say? Quit criticizing twilight! If you don’t like it oh well.

    Answers:

    1.) Bella isn’t perfect… she’s clumsy and most girls are. Bella lives in her own world and most girls dont.

    2.)Edward dosnt always catch her. What about Jacob? Forget him too? Yeah well, friends do always catch you when you fall.

    3.) She does to do stuff without Edward. So you are forgetting Jacob! Well, let me tell you that you are wrong!

    4.) She dosnt try to commit it! Get a life! She is cliff-diving FYI! Try it sometime!

    5.)Bella is not Steph! Steph is not Bella.

    6.)The books are well written! Thats why it was made into a movie and plus there making the whole series. So there! Plus Twilight has a million fans!

    7.)What Vampire rules? Trying to scare little kids now right? Well I never liked Dracula anyways.. he was lame!

    8.) Same as 7

    9.) Sorry. And so what if they like Alice or Rosalie? Then Jasper and Emmet are for them. Seriously, the book would influence those boys if they read it.

    10.) GIVE JACOB CREDIT TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!

    So JJ Twilight lover (ME) will be back! Dont worry

  572. JJ Twilight Freak
    Posted May 12, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    Ok so I am back

    11.) Something inhuman wouldnt have flaws. Mythical creature? DUH!

    12.) You call me a loser! No, I know you didnt call ME a loser! I have plenty of friends and 2 BFF’s! I am no loser! You shouldnt call people losers because they like something. Everybody that agrees with this loser are losers too. 3x the loserness!

    13.) This is in Bella’s point of view. she dosnt think she’s special. She’s got low self-esteem. look it up

    14.) When Bellas a vampire she takes a huge step up. edward would’ve killed Renesme FYI. Bella took control though!

    15.)Guess what?! They dont know each other well. It’d be awkward!

    16.) Guess what? You lack of that!You probably cant read!

    17.) She is a regular whining useless girl then. All girls are like that… but never useless. she cooks for charlie. call that useless?

    Peace

  573. kc
    Posted May 13, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    #31 Bella, Swan. There is a deeper meaning behind that( Bella means beautiful and Swans are suposed to usually travel in pairs…. get it?) and the other names are the ones that were around when that character was born so they make sense. e.g. Edward was an extremely popular name for the time he was supposedly born so it kida, really makes sense.

  574. Aroosa
    Posted May 15, 2009 at 8:37 am

    THANK YOU!!!!
    Now I know I’m not alone.

  575. Brittany
    Posted May 16, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    I think who wrote this website is a STUPID HEAD. You probaly couln’t write any better if you about to get killed. If I wanted to I could write 94 reasons why I hate YOU!!!! The 95th reason was NOT a reason. Bye Bye Dummy mc. stupid head.

  576. Emilee(Twilight LOVER)
    Posted May 16, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Okay,To begin with,Sarah has some mental issues she needs to work out with her crazy doctor.She is the worst human being alive!So shut down this website,LUNITIC!!!!!!!

  577. Nikki
    Posted May 17, 2009 at 9:09 pm

    Yeah,i know,it’s so annoying..
    guess what?
    i bought an entire saga and hated the first book so much i never bothered to read the last three..
    it sucks!now i end up regretting that i bought thos instead of the deathly hallows!!
    i mean,bella is still too young and she gets married and her mom agrees?
    what kind of a mother is her mother??

  578. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ
    Posted May 18, 2009 at 2:50 am

    Omfg…
    You’re just trying to show of by showing people how cool
    you are just because you hate Twilight. :O

  579. Hannah
    Posted May 18, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    To #598 no were not ‘trying to be cool’ bye hating Twilight, we are just trying to express our opinions about the book-if you are allowed to have your opinion, then we are allowed ours. You don’t see us hijacking the ‘we love Twilight’ or ‘how much do you love Twilight’ lists and forums.
    We want a place to express OUR OPINIONs with out people contridicting us, we are allowed our own opinion.

    In my mind, Twilight is a poorly written book, filled with gramatical mistakes and over use of descriptions. It’s just anout a sappy girl who thinks her life revolves around Edward bloody Cullen and expects to be rescued by her ‘prince charming’ everytime she gets into trouble.

  580. livy
    Posted May 18, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    I can’t really say anything too mean because I haven’t read Twilight, but I don’t plan to. Mainly because that is all anyone ever talks about, what is so great about a few vampires and some other random creatures mixed in?

    I kind of agree and disagree to some points of your list, but I loved # 53 (If the first 200 pages of your book rely on the mystery of a character’s identity, don’t slap “First, Edward was a vampire” on the back cover) and The book was so bad we wrote 95 reasons why we hate it.

    Love the list — AWESOME — LOL!

  581. Tiffa
    Posted May 18, 2009 at 11:12 pm

    Honestly, I enjoyed the books. Where I live, it wasn’t even popular until this year. That’s one thing that bothered me. :x
    I read it before most people here.
    Then the crazed ‘Twilighters’ showed up. How disgusting.
    The books were NOT that amazing people. They were… okay, at best. I met Stephanie Meyer, and she’s not that great either. Yeah, she’s pretty nice. But she’s almost as bland as the books were.

  582. Sarah :-)
    Posted May 19, 2009 at 2:55 am

    I liked the books when they were released (I.e. 2006) but i’m sick of the hype around them.
    And i agree with the poster, the fans who “sprung” up this year with the release of the movie can’t let anyone have an opinion :/
    Haha and # 53 is so true xD

    Sarah :-)

  583. BSR
    Posted May 19, 2009 at 10:45 am

    Thank you for this incredible list! Made my morning a little bit brighter….and now I have a list of my own to share with you, in a way –this is a column I wrote for my local paper. The best bits are the responses I got, and I’m sure you can identify. People are fantastically idiotic.
    http://www.thecourier.com/Issues/2009/Jan/11/ar_news_011109_story9.asp?d=011109_story9,2009,Jan,11&c=n

  584. twilight defendor
    Posted May 19, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    Personally i loved the series. I’m not like those other fans who say you cant express your opinion. But now its time to express mine. There are a few things wrong with this list.
    1. You repeat the same things over and over again.
    2. If you say Bella is perfect why is shy masoquist or doesn’t have a mind.
    3. Edward is 108 years old and Bella has the mind of an adult so they tecnically aren’t teenagers.
    4. Atractive guys flirt with teachers.
    5. At least Bella is capable of love you guys only seem to hate.
    6. A lot of parents ignore their kids.
    7. Isn’t writting supposed to be you fantasies.
    8. She doesn’t breaks the rules of vampires because there are no rules when it comes to writting, its her imagination so keep Meyer out of it.
    9. Not all twilight fans are crazy obsesive, only the ones who don’t have a life.
    10. I know plenty of guys who read twilight, straight guys.

    You guys will probably ignore this because you also only care about your opinions, but think that there are a lot more people who love twilight that people who hate it so watch out. And don’t even think about twisting this comment around to fit your needs because then you will only be scared cowards.

  585. BSR
    Posted May 19, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    To #604
    I can’t understand half of what you’re trying to say in this comment; maybe try learning proper grammar and spelling before calling out someone else. No one will respect your opinion if you don’t even care to express it in a way that can be understood. I’m not even going to go into why I disagree with your reasoning, because I can’t get past how awful the comment itself was.

  586. BSR, back for more
    Posted May 19, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    Actually, I’m really bored. So I am going to respond to your comment in what I hope will be a slightly constructive manner.

    1. Admittedly, this is a legitimate criticism of the list; it has nothing to do with the content of the list, however, and is irrelevant.
    2. In calling Bella “perfect” I believe the author of the list meant (and forgive me if I’m putting words in mouths) that Bella is a Mary Sue character: the type of character written in such a way that anyone can project their own feelings and emotions onto her without any actual characterization getting in the way. Bella is perfect only in that she is perfectly empty.
    3. Having the mind of an adult doesn’t make one not a teenager. The author was pointing out the hideous age discrepancy between the characters, not commenting on their maturity.
    4. What does that have to do with anything?
    5. Bella is not capable of love; Bella is capable of slavish devotion to an Adonis-esque figure whose only real attraction seems to be his wonderful gorgeous body and ability to brood.
    6. The point was that the relationship between Bella and Charlie is implied to be much stronger; I know very few teenagers given half the freedom Bella had. Yes, a lot of parents ignore their children, but that’s not how the relationship is written -only how it works. And it’s a poor bit of characterization.
    7. Yes, and no. When an individual’s fantasies get this much attention (an individual with poorly written and shallow fantasies), something is wrong. There’s no problem with writing a story based on your own dreams, but to try to get it published (and in this case, succeed, sadly enough) is ridiculously self-serving and rather disgusting.
    8. There are things called “genres” and “canon” in literature, conventions and rules that *most* authors follow when writing. Innovation is all well and good, when it isn’t terrible. Meyer is a terrible writer, and she essentially took vampire lore and removed anything good and worthwhile from it. And yes, there are rules for writing. And you should know them before you go about writing something, otherwise you look like an idiot.
    9. That I’ll give you.
    10. So what? Who cares? Congratulations for you, I suppose. This is another relatively irrelevant point.

  587. Twilighting
    Posted May 20, 2009 at 3:08 am

    Sarah Rebecca…your list is lame and redundant. Why are you so jealous? Why are you such a hater? I guess this was the only thing you could get people to read. Actually, it’s just a list of 95 or so things that you complain about, most of which is just reworded in different ways (much like your complaints about Twilight), and even then I stopped reading somewhere around 11 on your list of complaints. Why are you such a hater? Seriously, maybe you should talk to a professional about your anger issues.
    I’m just saying….

  588. misa
    Posted May 20, 2009 at 9:54 am

    ALL HAIL KIRA. haha.
    I can’t help but comment. Yes, it’s terribly written. Yes, the one who wrote this list doesn’t have a published book.
    No, twilight is not better than harry potter. Chuck Norris can actually destroy cullen’s face if he wanted to.

    No, you can’t stop people from having their own opinions. You can’t tell someone to stop hating something just because you like it.

  589. XxlaurenxX
    Posted May 20, 2009 at 11:39 am

    OMG !!!!!!! SHUT UP !! twilight is da best seris of books evermade !!! could u write 4 books ?? i dont tink so !!! all books are based onn igmation u all dont have any !!! yes boys dont sparkle !!! but they dont wear black capes either !! so stephines is a more real and modren type vampire !!! yous are ovislously either stupit or slow cause look around twilight is da biggest ting out dare !!!

    YOU ARE JUST A OBBESED AS EVERYONE ELSE CAUSE IF U DIDNT LIKE IT U WOUNT NT HAVE SPENT UR TIME WRITING 95 THINGS ABOUT TWILIGHT ??

  590. BSR
    Posted May 20, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    Wow, Lauren.
    I really hope you’re a troll, but I’m betting you’re maybe 12 at best. Get over yourself and learn to write before you flame on someone, or don’t do it.

  591. Liz
    Posted May 20, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    i so agree with every single word that you guys said. How about if the STUPID twilight fans wanna kill us, how about we kill them and make them shut up about their obsession of the damn series.

  592. Miriam
    Posted May 20, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    haha… your funny SARAH REBECCA… but your by far the stupidest person i have ever heard of… i really enjoy how much you hate TWILIGHT but still decide to write about it… you need to get a life… you wouldn’t know a good book if it sat in your face… so just to let you know… i love the humor you brought to me… this really made my day… really…! like… how stupid can you be…? i’ll answer that… VERY!!!!!… so as for you and your little crew that supposidley hate TWILIGHT can all just jump off a bridge. because this girl right here is a twilight fan… haha…

  593. ashamed to have read twilight T_T
    Posted May 20, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    omg! # 89 had me lmaoing.
    Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight and you shouldn’t either!! XD
    I LOVE YOU PEOPLE!!!

    (misaki doesnt approve either. God told him not to)

  594. Christos.
    Posted May 21, 2009 at 2:10 am

    and now? There are over 600 posts, perhaps Martin Luther should’ve sticky noted the door instead for effect.

  595. Michelle
    Posted May 21, 2009 at 7:11 am

    You were SPOT ON. I was so desperately seeking for someone who hates twilight as much as me. It’s terrible. I wanted to tear the book when I got to the 3rd chapter. And your reasons were absolutely hilarious!! I TOTALLY agree. THANK YOU

  596. Underworld Loooover
    Posted May 21, 2009 at 10:59 am

    underworld and twilight are basically the same. the only difference is that underworld calls the werewolves are called lycans.

  597. Emma
    Posted May 22, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    You clearly haven’t read the book, #4…. Bella doesn’t try to commit sucide.
    And also #88 i think

    You are allowed to have your own opinion, just like we are allowed to have ours. Get over it. Twilight fans don’t seem to understand that though and attack at the mention of flaw in the book.

    You cant say that after #18
    People say that Twilight is better than Harry Potter. Guess what? WRONG.
    A little hypocritical don’t you think?
    :)

  598. Noelia
    Posted May 22, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    You are right. So right.

    I didn’t read the entire series, I read the first one and wondered why and how this woman (Meyer)had got her book published. I believe everybody has a right to write, because it’s something so wonderful to do ^^.

    Personally, I don’t like books written in first person. And really, reading all the book through Bella’s thoughts was hell. She is plain, and selfish, and acts like a completely brat, even if she is not even pretty (let’s remember, she thinks she is ordinary but ALL the men want to be with her).
    And annoying, so annoying. She has no goal in her life, other than not getting old.
    When Edward confessed he couldn’t read his mind all I could think was “lucky bastard”.
    I believe that it was told by Bella’s POV just to point out that she indeed has thoughts.

    One of my most favourite parts of the first book was the night Bella came to the conclusion “Edward must be a vampire”. Then, the following day is sunny and none of the Cullen family assist school and Bella, our very clever main character, seems so confused by their absence. I suppose some girls got it (sunny day = no vampire) and they thought they were oh so smart for getting it. Yes, I got it. No, I didn’t feel clever, I was to busy laughing at this.
    And girls, Edward is a stalker. If you need a creepy boy to be always watching you to feel you worth something you have issues.

    As I said before, I didn’t read the whole series but a friend did.

    SPOILER..
    The magicaaaaal baby. Oh, Lord. The magical baby, “I am the magical baby, touch me and feel my life.” I usually don’t need to touch people to let them know I am alive.
    END OF SPOILER

    Hannah, they shouldn’t burn them, they should recycle them ^^.

    I apology for any grammatical mistake or wrong use of word. English is not my first language, but I just wanted to tell you, Rebecca, you are very right.

  599. Millie
    Posted May 22, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    “9. The world population will come to an end because all girls who read this book will think they are Bella and will wait for their Edward to come until they are old. And he’ll never come.”

    That’s not fair. Don’t stick stereotypes on us fantasy-loving-to-the-point-where-it’s-almost-a-cult teenage girls. The first time I read twilight, I thought it was boring, poorly written and creep… it reminded me of a fan fiction… like Stephanie Meyer made one of her sexual fantasies into a book.

    I’m a huge fan of vampire novels. It’s safe to say I’m obsessed. So my friends found it SHOCKING when I HATED this book. But to anyone in their right mind, it’s not hard to see why.

    Twilight is an insult to vampires. AND THAT’S AN UNDERSTATEMENT.

    One of my friends stopped talking to me because I hate the book. She calls me an “Edward Hater”.

  600. Kerry
    Posted May 23, 2009 at 7:20 am

    I love you.

    I didn’t read this book, or any in the series, nor do I plan too.

    Just the same, this list is amazing.

    You rock.

  601. Ash
    Posted May 23, 2009 at 8:18 am

    Twilight is the worst book in the world. That, and y does everyone think Robert Pattinson is hot? HE’S SOOOOOOOOOO UGLY!!!!! Idk wut Bella sees in him. The book doesn’t even make sense. If shes trying to be close with him and then he moves away, y does he apologize? “Oh, I’m so sorry for avoiding your greasy touch. PLEASE stop dating me.” Twilight is so dumb! Y does everyone love it?????????

  602. jessina
    Posted May 23, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    BLAH BLAH BLAH to all you twilight haters.twilight is awesome.if you have a problem with twilight,take it up with STEPHENIE MEYER.understand?and sarah rebbecca,you are really a bad judge.
    TO:Ash,for one,robert pattinson is HOT.and two, if bella stops dating edward,there’s no story.SO HA!!!!!!!

  603. Kath
    Posted May 23, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    I totally agree with you about twilight.
    I’m so annoyed with Bella. I mean who goes into a depression for 6 months over a stupid guy she’s only been dating for less than a year. Drama queen.
    And why did Bella have to be in the battle in Eclipse. Sit back and relax. Everyones heard enough about you.
    Why did Bella go and have a kid in the end. Renessme ruined the whole series and all of Breaking Dawn was SOOOOOOOOOOOOO CHEESY!
    Anyway thanks for writing this!

  604. I hate Twilight
    Posted May 23, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    My friend wanted me to read the book… I nearly barfed when I read the back… Imagine how much I would have puked after reading the whole series.

  605. Twilight is CRAP
    Posted May 23, 2009 at 10:34 pm

    I enjoy reading it, but twilight is CRAP. It’s a lot of crap about a talentless hack called Bella and a pedophilic vampire who fall in love with each other instantly for the only two reason that Bella smells good and Edward is hot. Bella’s life revolves completely around Edward. Truth: 95/95

  606. that one person
    Posted May 23, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    ok so you say “Wow, yet another ‘original’ plot of forbidden love”, but when meyer tries to be original and create her own ideas for vampire traits (like super speed, and the fact that they dont burn when the come out into the sun) you tottaly atack her and say “she breaks rules set by more esteemed authors”

    oh and for yor info, jacod forcedly kisses he in one of the books, she doesnt commit suicied she jumps off a cliff because of the adrenaline (and the fact that million of other people had already jumped of that cliff and came out perfectly fine, didnt help your cause)and just to prove to you that you dot read really well, edward explains why doesnt have fangs in the first book

  607. twilight hater
    Posted May 24, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    actually you probably could fit those 4 books into 1…without all the description and stuff like it takes about 3 pages for bella to jump off a cliff…

  608. Liz
    Posted May 25, 2009 at 9:17 am

    Read it, thought I liked it. Then after a month of sitting at a lunch table with one of the most twilight obsessed people I know, I decided it would be better if I made fun of it. It’s what I do best. Oh and a comment on #93, about Harry Potter, I have a shirt that says “Harry Potter can beat Edward Cullen sparkly ass.” True story. (:
    Oh, and kudos to you for writing this, opinions make the world go round, especially when the opinions are the more logical ones.

  609. SusanBoyle
    Posted May 25, 2009 at 11:51 am

    I loved this book, Bella was prehaps THE most original character ever created, as is the story line. I can’t wait for my very own Edward to come along, and he can rescue me and he can catch me when I’m clumsy. If people dont like twilight I Susan Boyle will us my AWESOME vampire powers on you!
    Glitter Mode! Engage!

  610. Esme
    Posted May 25, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    For commenter #10

    Esme and Jasper are actually relatively popular names. They are not ‘original’ and i know/ or have met several people with the same name as me.
    Picking a slightly old fashioned name does not make it ‘original.’
    Love the list guys.

  611. Lilith Shadows
    Posted May 25, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    The list was great!I laughed as much as I laughed when I read Twilight.

  612. Audrey
    Posted May 25, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    I’m 15, and I read all four books. Or, kinda read them. I had to skip over many paragraphs of the gushy adjective nonsense (Edward is so perfect and amazing and beautiful and has the most gorgeously defined jawline ever, etc). By the way, that book is horribly written. Meyer abused the thesaurus and doesn’t know how to pace plots.

    Edward! He is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo damn controlling, it’s abusive! And Bella is just stupid! She has no goals in life. She’s blinded by Edward’s hotness. And the book is the most sexist thing I’ve ever read that was published in the last decade. Females who obsess over the book are being disgraceful to their gender!

    Anyways…love the list, although I personally don’t agree that Twilight was for 10 year olds, haha. In fact, I don’t think anyone under 13-14 should read it…partially because of the sex and graphic ‘labor’ scene in the fourth book, but mostly because it gives girls an UNREALISTIC expectations of men, indirectly promotes sexism, and makes them confuse the difference between lust and love. Hell, I don’t think ANYONE should read Twilight!

    Oh, and the only thing that pisses me off more than a Twilight fan is a Twilight fan who hates Harry Potter. Why, because Harry Potter actually has developed characters, has several strong females (even though the main character was a male), and isn’t gushing to the brim with stupid, brainless conversations about how they ‘love’ each other?

  613. lovepugs
    Posted May 25, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    WRONG!!!!

  614. musicguyguy
    Posted May 25, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    lol, AGREED!
    The only reason I kept reading is because I expected it to get better. Why else could it be so popular? Unfortunately, I was wrong, although there were a few moments in the book that were pretty good. The whole thing still sucks.

  615. emkat
    Posted May 25, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    YES #66 is so right.

  616. Ellester
    Posted May 25, 2009 at 11:03 pm

    I agree with you 100% and there are SO MANY MORE reasons Twilight sucks. Oh by the way all the vampires in the series are PUSSIES you want to see real vampires watch 30 Days Of Night

  617. priya
    Posted May 26, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    I have read the first three books of the Twilight series
    I have enjoyed all three but I am not going to bother reading the last book yet, as I am reading something far more interesting: Wuthering Heights
    :)
    It is far more romantic than the whole Twilight series
    and oh, I’m in love with the novel
    so overall, Twilight is good, but theres way much better :)

  618. Demi Levato
    Posted May 26, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    I agree with most of these, but come on, I think you guys are just obssessing over hating twilight.

  619. kit
    Posted May 26, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    As previously said the people who moon over Edward all there lifes will never have any children.

    Meyer Elevated the Gene pool.

  620. unlike
    Posted May 27, 2009 at 12:16 am

    If you have that much time to make that many criticisms about a book meant for young teens to read and fantasize about than you have no life. Get over the fact that a bunch of young kids enjoy a book about vampires and werewolves. I don’t know if you know this or not but there is a whole genre dedicated to fiction and fiction is full of made-up, unreal stories.. Stick to criticizing your own work or become a professor and criticize your students work so you can put all your “knowledge” to work. Just know you sound pathetic that you can sit and make up that many dislikes about a book made for mostly young teenagers. Think about it. And when you think about how pathetic you are you can GET A LIFE.

  621. Norwegian Twiligther
    Posted May 27, 2009 at 6:14 am

    I’m sorry, I know nobody gives a crap about my opinion, but I just have to say it!

    I didn’t even read this whole list, because most of them are childish, stupid, confusing, narrow-eyed (don’t know if that’s a word in English) and most of all, not true. Sure, some of them might work for you people who just gotta hate it, but it’s so many things I can’t see how it’s a bad thing! For instance, why is the fact that you think Bella is perfect a bad thing?
    And for your narrow-eyedness (I really don’t think THAT is a word..), she doesn’t mention fangs, because they don’t have any. Are you so stupid that you really don’t realize that it’s fiction, and that you can write almost anything you want when you writing fiction? Of course she doesn’t have to stick to all the other vampire-legends! It’s a huge part of it all!!
    And you use the same accusations sooo many times. It’s not 95 reasons, it’s maybe 10. And, if you have an IQ above 80 and have read the books, the list probably gets much, much shorter than those 10 reasons.

  622. meira
    Posted May 27, 2009 at 8:04 am

    You are the coolest person right now!!!

  623. BSR
    Posted May 27, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    Norwegian Twilighter –I think the word you were looking for was narrow-mindedness. :)
    I disagree with your comment to some extent -yes, the author of this list is vitriolic and repetitive, but in her defense, so are most of the comments she receives. Trying to have a conversation with a “Twilight” Fan is usually like trying to converse with a rabid wolverine; none of them will accept any legitimate criticism of the stories (and there is plenty), so we descend into the same level of immaturity we deal with.
    Now to promote myself…I have a similar article that was published in my local newspaper, and I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on it. Here’s the link:
    http://www.thecourier.com/Issues/2009/Jan/11/ar_news_011109_story9.asp?d=011109_story9,2009,Jan,11&c=n

  624. Jared
    Posted May 28, 2009 at 11:16 am

    I agree w/ Derek. This book somehow manages to both suck and blow at the same time.

  625. Krista
    Posted May 29, 2009 at 12:03 am

    You forgot to mention that they go to high school over and over again. For decades. I saw the movie and they had a million graduation hats on the wall. Wtf is up with that? If I could live forever I wouldn’t be going to high school over and over.

  626. Krista
    Posted May 29, 2009 at 12:07 am

    I also think that a lot of women in the next generation will often have black eyes due to reading Twilight for dating advice in their teens..

  627. Amy
    Posted May 29, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    lol, i totally agree! i hate twilight with all my heart!! death to twilight!

  628. Georgina
    Posted May 29, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    Lol-to Hannah (commenter 611) you comment cracked me up so much:) I couldn’t stop laughing

    Quote

    ‘Did I choose Team Edward or Team Jacob?
    I choose neither because…..

    I choose TEAM BURNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Burn all Twilight Books:))’
    end quote.

    So funny:))
    God I hate Twilight!!!!! Twilight should DIE!!!!!!

  629. Maris
    Posted May 30, 2009 at 6:33 am

    Excuse me Lola-you do realise you talking about a book?? your vehemently defending a character in a book who does not exist and will never existed-the fact that you think that he IS real is a sign of Physicosis-no offense or anything but no one is ever going to get a guy like Edward because he does not exist-please just don’t say anything else because it just sounds overly obcesive and it also sounds as if you have fooled your brain into beliving that fictional characters exist.
    And to conclude we can actually ‘trash talk’ anyone we want because if you have not noticed that this is a Hating Twilight List-we are on this site because we do not like the book-do not expect every person in the world to like the same thing as you do-get over yourself.

  630. Maris
    Posted May 30, 2009 at 6:35 am

    Excuse me Lola-you do realise you talking about a book?? your vehemently defending a character in a book who does not exist and will never existed-the fact that you think that he IS real is a sign of Physicosis-no offense or anything but no one is ever going to get a guy like Edward because he does not exist-please just don\’t say anything else because it just sounds overly obcesive and it also sounds as if you have fooled your brain into beliving that fictional characters exist.
    And to conclude we can actually \’trash talk\’ anyone we want because if you have not noticed that this is a Hating Twilight List-we are on this site because we do not like the book-do not expect every person in the world to like the same thing as you do-get over yourself.

  631. sifr
    Posted May 30, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    i just hate how all the girls reading it, and by that i mean half the population, don’t have lives. i have not read the twilight books, because they sound like crap.

  632. Sally
    Posted May 30, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    So, yeah, ummm…. Twilight is NOT literature. Twilight is a TIME OF DAY!!!!!! And literature is by Poe, Shakespeare, Mary Shelley, and the like. All who read this Twilight rubbish are mentally unsound!

  633. Claire
    Posted May 30, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    I love it how most of the Twilight fans are talking about the CHARACTERS as if they are real people. This book has made millions of girls obsessed with something that is completley and utterly made up.

  634. Indi
    Posted May 30, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    That was the most amazing list I’ve ever read.
    Ever.

  635. drew46n2
    Posted May 30, 2009 at 10:45 pm

    I thought Twilight was written by R.L. Stein, so, hey! What an informative blog i’ve stumbled onto.

    Luckily the literary community does not take 14-year-old girls’ opinions seriously. But im sure the scholastic bookfair does.

  636. twilight hater9
    Posted May 31, 2009 at 10:10 pm

    Wow, I couldn’t agree anymore. I do have to say that some of your reasons to hate twilight were lacking some support, but i have to agree Twilight was a very poor piece of literature. What upsets me even more is the huge succes it’s became winning mutiple awards in the MTV Movie awards. Plus I think Kristen Stewart might be on some type of narcodic. Haha! Overall these were very good reasons to hate the book twilight and the rest of the seemingly never ending, pointless series.

  637. maikee
    Posted June 1, 2009 at 2:58 am

    oh my god..i love it..your reasons are just so perfect..whats with twilight anyway?..thats true Harry Potter can kick Edwards ass anytime!..but i do get why they love twilight..and its because of Edward..he’s sexy and everything that is perfect for a guy..girls love the idea of him in their minds while they are reading the book..he is like the perfect modern Romeo/Prince Charming..girls just love the idea of it right..i too fell for it..but i just hate when people say its the best or it tops among the other books..i just hate when people give too much fuss about it..there are so many books and movies that are better than twilight and its series..or books turned into movies..what lord of the rings and harry potter just went out of the picture when twilight arrived?..come on!..look at the content..look at the effort people went through to write these books..look at the talent Tolkien and Rowling and other renowned writers..they are nothing compared to whoever wrote the twilight series..twilight and its other books may be good and its writer might be good too..but please dont ignore and make it the best book ever written for there are so many books better and has more substance than it..some books may lack the “Edward-factor” but some books are more romantic, more interesting and more thrilling and some books also have cute/hot characters..so lets just put this twilight fever into a stop..some other movies and books require our much needed attention and appreciation!!!!

  638. >
    Posted June 1, 2009 at 7:01 am

    I read Twilight, liked it. Then these screaming fangirls all of the sudden come whirling in from nowhere, and…it kind of insulted me, the way they obsessed over Edward and Jacob. And it was kind of like, “Erm, excuse me, miss, but do you even know how to read?” I hate telling people I like Twilight now because they all assume I’m “just another fangirl.”
    And.
    This list could be better.
    I’m serious.
    I like Twilight, but there are certainly some flaws with the books…as there are with this list.
    Bella has, since Edward left in New Moon, been my least favorite character, so the Bella bashes, I kind of enjoyed…=]
    But she was my least favorite character because one of her biggest flaws: being so dependent on Edward. She certainly has more flaws than just being clumsy.

  639. Sparky
    Posted June 1, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    ahh these are amazing lol
    especially:
    81 – chuck norris ftw? :D
    86 – that comes up alot but still

  640. May
    Posted June 1, 2009 at 6:27 pm

    THANK YOU!!!! All the girls in my class drools over that book!
    Noone cares about my opion yet I respct thers! What up whit that!
    One of my so called frends said”You have the right to state your opion, but not your opion on twilight.” WHAT UP WIYH THAT!!! GOD!!
    And today at luch they was biching on me about not liking Twilight! Twilight is just as bad as war!

  641. jack
    Posted June 1, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    You know, Twilight is going to cause the next world war with dumbshi* up vampires and warewolfs the only cool guy is Jacob who the only person that isnt a rapist. Haha Join the cult Twilight haters.

  642. hurray
    Posted June 1, 2009 at 8:17 pm

    hey what a list! but hey you mustve read the book from cover to cover to be able to come up with almost a hundred reasons to hate Twilight series.

    im not THAT crazy about the saga but i just liked the story since i kind of like the supernatural as well. i thought it was too kiddie too before but when i read it, i think it was ok. meyer tried to intertwine fanstasy, supernatural, etc with reality and may be thats why some people actually thinks it can or may be possible to exist even though its not lol. its healthy sometimes to snap out of reality but be sure to go back lmao! let the kids ‘drool’ over the saga for now, they’re still young. its a fiction too so there’s no need to debate what supposed to have happened or what and who should the character be. peace!

  643. hahaha
    Posted June 1, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    i actually enjoyed the series as a part of pleasure reading and free time. but i also enjoyed this list. (:
    i’m pretty unbiased. but i agree with almost your whole list most def

  644. Collie Dog
    Posted June 2, 2009 at 1:52 am

    Oh My God… there are actually people who hate Twilight?! I am not alone!?
    *crawls out of bomb shelter, hiding from crazy Twi-Fans*
    I LOVE you!

  645. Smook
    Posted June 2, 2009 at 2:07 am

    Those Fan girls are utterly INSANE! But, the truth is, anyone of the non-loving Twilight people could kick any Fan chick’s ass.., I mean, come on; after they threaten your life with their aquired Vampire powers, the second you attempt to grate their face with the floor they’re going to run screaming or hope with their pathetic little hearts that their ‘Edward’ will save them. And then they will die. xD

  646. Emma
    Posted June 2, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    I just love your list. I couldn’t stop laughing when I read it. Twilight is such crap and the fans are so weird.

  647. whale sweater
    Posted June 2, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    did i miss something, isn’t this supposed to be funny? i mean there is a little bit of dramatic irony here with the author commenting on how intense and humorless twilight fans are and then the fans respond by being totally intense and completely humorless. i have never read the books but i did watch the movie when i was really sick. i thought it was visually appealing to watch but that nothing happened. no story arc or real character development or anything. but perfect to watch when you have the flu!
    anyway even having not read the books but being familiar with them, this list was pretty funny! not every item on the list was great but quite of few of them really cracked me up. like these:

    Why is it called the Twilight Series if only one book is titled Twilight?

    A hundred years difference = pedophile. ha ha!

    If the first 200 pages of your book rely on the mystery of a character’s identity, don’t slap “First, Edward was a vampire” on the back cover.

    and finally: It’s just not healthy to teach young girls that True Love involves the guy watching you while you sleep. priceless.

    and i am pretty sure that was the point. to be funny. not to “shove a personal opinion down everyone’s throats.” um, intense much? it’s a joke, chillax.

  648. bob
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 6:18 am

    Disgusting how Bella loves 2 guys and enjoys kissing them both. Probably just reflecting the author’s own life. And how dare the critics say ‘move over, harry potter’? twilight is not even fit to be compared to a book as great as harry potter. The whole book just makes me want to puke.

  649. ObsessedTwilightFan
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 10:06 am

    You Seriously Need Yo Check Into A Mental Health Clinic If You Think That There Is ANYTHING Wrong With Twilight! I Am A Obsessed Fan And If I Were You, If You Don’t Want A Cult Of Fan Girls At Your Door Trying To Kill You :) , Keep Your Crappy Opinions To Yourself :) Meyer Is The Best Author Ever! Twilgiht Beats HP Hands Down, And Btw, Twilight Haters Need A Life Check =D

  650. Sarah
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 10:14 am

    #to Obsessed Twilight Fan
    At least Twilight Haters don’t base their entire lives around a BOOK!!! I mean seriously why does it matter if we don’t like Twilight? you don’t like Harry Potter and I’m not biting your head off-get over yourself.

  651. ObsessedTwilightFan
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 11:17 am

    Actually I Like Harry Potter So Yeah, Im Just Saying No Need Try And Put People Off It By Puttng Them Thigs Down Is There? No. And Is My Life Based Around This Book, Er No :) So Next Time Wanna Check Before You Accuse Because I Like My Tvm!

  652. ktmporta
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 11:28 am

    ja ele o ele
    a la verdad que no tienen mas nada que hacer
    en serio
    matate loka
    te sientes mejor tirandole a otras cosas
    no tienes mas nada que hacer? ke vida mas triste

  653. ..
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 11:34 am

    osea no me molesta que no te guste
    yo se un cojon de gente k no le gusta y estoi fine con eso
    pero
    lol
    gastar tanto fkn tiempo, osea 95 razones? loka matate, en realidad no tienes mas nada que hacer
    tripeate esto, te gusta hp y es una senda mierda
    la gente fanatica dice esas cosas de twilight pq sabemos que les jode la paciencia jaja
    tu lo coges demaciado de serio

  654. Sarah
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    To ObsessedTwilightFan

    I’m sorry I offended you, I’m not trying to put people of the books because everybodys got their own opinions and tastes-if one person likes something theres going to be people that hate it. That’s the only point I want to get across to people-it doesn’t matter what different opinions on something are.

    Sorry again I offended you.

  655. Kristie
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    true true

  656. Martha
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    The Twilight books are badly written. But that’s fine, as long as they are kept in the tween to teen category. No one over 21 has any business reading them.

  657. A.
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    I really wish people would stop talking about it. Trying to convince Twitards that the book is ultimately a highly flawed piece of literature is like trying to convince Baptists that being gay is not a psychological problem that can be solved by Jesus.

    I want to stop hitting “Stumble” and seeing Twilight wordvomit. Just sayin’.

  658. Original person 1
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 11:34 pm

    Why would anyone like someone who’s always “cold”.

    If Edward doesn’t want Bella to become a vampire then she’ll just get old & die and he’ll suicide.

  659. GeoGeo
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 11:40 pm

    My Mom read the first chapter of New Moon, said it’s cheesy(Period)

  660. Jinn
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 12:45 am

    Oh men, finally someone other than me gets it… I mean here I would be burned alive saying “I HATE TWILIGHT”… And they would confine me in an insane asylum and make me read the book again and again until I like it… I’m not kidding… They said that to me…

  661. ObsessedTwilightFan
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 10:55 am

    Thanks :) , I Appreciate A Civil Response From A Twilight Hater :D I To Am Sorry For Judging Your Opinions, Your Right :) And Don’t Worry People Say Worse Things About Twilight At My School Haha (: I Do See Your Point Of View A Little Bit, I Admit =D We Can All Get Along Together Haha (:  And Twilight Rules Haha Had To Put That In (Y)!

  662. bobo
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    I think eveyone is sick of it because its stupid and a sucess!!!
    (response to post # 7)
    The movie won every other award in the MTV movie awards.

  663. Bebo
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    I think you are just as much as a LOSER as the people who rave about twilight because you spent all that time making up 95 reasons why you hate it. FACE IT YOU’RE A LOSER!!!!

  664. Karla
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    I am so angry with Twilight everybody says that Twilight is better than Harry Potter and guess what everybody picked Twilight I mean what is so good about that movie. Everybody likes it did you see the movie awards they won every thing. Lets just name it the Twilight awards. Did you see the girl who played Bella she acted like she didn’t want to be there. I only remember the guy Edward from Harry Potter as Cedric Diggory. If you don’t know who that is its the Twilight guy. I just don’t like that movie for some reason.

  665. megan
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    Whoever wrote this is a legend.

  666. Balls
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    hater

  667. A real goer of the interweb
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    My main point is, number 62 made me lol so hard…

    The internet has people expressing their opinion?! Go figure!!
    Seriously, that\’s all the internet is. Has anyone seen site\’s like 4chan? I mean, really.

    There goes my faith in humanity… although, most of the Internet\’s population has already killed that.

    Anyway, look! I managed to use coherent sentences, and proper spelling! Punctuation, even! See, it\’s not that hard, now is it?

    Although, to those writing this list, many of your points were repeated, and not all of them were actual reasons against the book. Just for the record.

    Now that I\’ve made my few points, I want to recommend an EXCELLENT series of books, so amazing and well written, with and intricate plot and amazing character development. It\’s not for you stupid teenage girls, either, with your sparkly vampires. Its got assassins, magic, death, lots and lots of blood, various other mature things… for those looking for a GOOD book, with REAL action, this is the book for you. It\’s a trilogy, and the first is called Way of the Shadows.

    Please read it.

    And be wary… Most people online may be sarcastic, or joking. Don’t take all jokes, or even statements, seriously.

    YOUR ALL WRONG, ALL OF YOU. SHUT UP AND STOP BEING STUPID. I GET IT. YOU HAVE YOUR OPINIONS. YES MOST OF THIS LIST WAS STUPID. YES MOST OF TWILIGHT WAS STUPID. THAT’S THE TRUTH, THE END, GET OVER IT

  668. someone who doesn't give a s***
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    OH MY GOD MY BRAIN CELLS

    all of you have killed them. ALL of you. Twilight haters and Twilight lovers alike. You have your own opinions. This was obviously a list made for twilight haters. Get over it. No matter how much you whine in the comments, tis not going to change.

    Done.

    That’s it.

    Get over it, and go away.

  669. tyler
    Posted June 5, 2009 at 11:23 am

    its the stupidest plot ever! he likes her because she smells good and cant read her mind! this is insane i have read stories by 1st graders that make more sense

  670. Mars
    Posted June 5, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    @Bebo

    “Face it you’re a loser!”

    And you’re the person who read all the way through that “loser” list, and then had the time to comment.

    What does that make you? A double loser?

  671. sarahrebeccahater
    Posted June 5, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    your comment on twilight made me puke!their so stupid it made me think your stupid!then again maybe you are, i don’t know!i find your stupid reasons very HURTFUL!mars just might be right! you are a loser because if you didn’t like “Twilight” why did you waste your time reading the rest of [to you] the oh so boring “Twilight” series!

  672. jessina
    Posted June 5, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    sarah rebecca you need a life. a real one that you don’t make stupid bashing websites about twilight and other things like that.even though your stupidness is humerous to me,your really stupid. (and i love how much you are)

  673. Avi
    Posted June 6, 2009 at 2:49 am

    I read the first book. I read the second book thinking it would somehow redeem itself. Harry Potter was meant for a younger audience, so maybe you just have to get through the slosh. I’m sure there had to be some real story in there other than the Mary-Sure and Mr Sparkles to be so popular, right? I wish I could get my money back.

  674. HeroJaejoong
    Posted June 6, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    Twilight is really stupid and overrated.

  675. EliG
    Posted June 6, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    “People say that Twilight is better than Harry Potter. Guess what? WRONG.” I rather read Harry Potter than Twilight…

  676. LYAHness
    Posted June 6, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    LOL iLove this list!! it’s so true. lmao.
    i haven’t read any of the twilight series books because, the sight of it disgusts me.!! and to all the “vampires” (LMMFAO) that are getting ANGRY about this post calm the fudge.N down LOL it says – Why I Hate Twilight – so OBVIOUSLY you’s are not going to like it!! yet you still read it . HAHAHAHA

    - Harry Potter rocks.! :D i TOTALLY AGREE WITH # 692 – Elig -
    harry potter is way better than TWILIGHT. hahaha because unlike Twilight, The Harry Potter characters arn’t immortal which is sooo stupid!! ♔ ♕ ♚ ♛
    (i mean bella and edward can’t die thats just stupid!!)

    im borrowing your list :D

  677. BekahBOO
    Posted June 7, 2009 at 2:46 am

    I love you! C: This perfectly sums up that entire piece of trash series.

  678. EG
    Posted June 7, 2009 at 4:18 am

    This is as fun as reading the comments on YouTube videos. Never have people hated each other more than they have on the internet. Or, at least, never have they made themselves more ridiculous doing it.

    As for my opinion: I don’t really have one other than it’s not the best series I’ve read, but neither is it the worst.

    I would like to comment on parts of your list. Some things I agree with and others I do not.

    #8 Do you mean rules written by other authors for vampires? An author is entitled to create his or her own universe where different rules apply than those in other books. If every book had to follow standard rules, we never would have had the privilege of reading many of what are now considered classics.

    #21 Sex does not have to be standard for a vampire novel. Sexuality seems to be fairly standard, but not necessarily the actual, physical act.

    #27 I’ve never heard that Meyer never used the word ‘said’ in the first novel, but I can tell you for certain that it is not true.

    #31 Original names? Does everyone in real life have an original name? It was realistic. And I appreciate that it a novel.

    #32 You do have a point there. That really did drive me nuts.

    #34 People also think of Stephen King as the best writer ever, but I disagree. In fact, skipping to #43 here, I don’t like his work and therefore his criticism of another author does not affect my opinion at all.

    #35 Yes, it was long. It was very long. They could have done without the entire second book and the whole, “Oh, I must be with Edward, but I love you, too, Jacob,” part.

    #37 Why is the “Redwall Series” called the “Redwall Series if only its first book is called “Redwall”? Why are the “Bloody Jack Adventures” and “The Princess Diaries” called such if only their first books bear the same name? This is done sometimes.

    #44 “It’s stupid.” Well, we could sling around things like, “You’re stupid,” and “It’s stupid,” all day, but that will get us nowhere.

    #49 If the people who enjoy the books don’t notice, it should hardly matter. I’ve read much worse.

    #52 So… It’s not a good novel if a guy doesn’t like it?

    #55 This is where Meyer really gets it wrong. They do not fall in love with each other, they fall in lust. I do not believe in love at first sight, but I do believe in lust at first sight. Love takes longer.

    #57 I agree wholeheartedly. It’s creepy. It’s not romantic, it’s just creepy.

    #61, 62, 63, and 64 Three examples do not prove the norm.

    #76 That quote made me laugh.

    Well, this ended up being much, much longer than I intended. But… I really needed to tell someone what I thought. Feel free to ignore or dismiss my words as drabble, but… they’re good points in my mind, and I’m sure there’s bound to be someone out there who agrees with me on some point.

  679. okay.
    Posted June 7, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    The only reason why this book/series is “enjoyible” to teenage girls in perticular is because the book is easy to read and they would rather read something easy (such as the Twilght series) than to read something they would actually have to think about(and figure out for themselves).

  680. Hate
    Posted June 7, 2009 at 8:18 pm

    There is so many more reasons to hate it then just 95 plus you cant even say bite me any more and twilight fans say it will take over the world but truely it wont because there are many people that hate it the only thing that twilight will do is brain wash people and make a good fire!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  681. Julia
    Posted June 7, 2009 at 10:01 pm

    I hate it too! http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090607195844AADCJ4D People who also hate it, comment here about why xD BAN TOGETHER!!

  682. Sally
    Posted June 7, 2009 at 10:10 pm

    Your reasons are the best!! Twilight is NOT literature. Literature is Poe or Shakespeare or Shelly! If you want a vampire novel read Dracula by Bram Stoker. That is literature that isn’t just for dorks who want a book thicker that 1 millimeter!

  683. Molls
    Posted June 8, 2009 at 7:23 am

    ROCK ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I LOVE this website!!!!!!!

    I’m still trying to get over the fact that this series got published!

  684. Trl
    Posted June 8, 2009 at 9:54 am

    To those of you who actually like Twilight:

    I respect your position, but seriously, check out this CP.

  685. Mrs.Potter
    Posted June 8, 2009 at 11:38 am

    haha the whole time i was reading your reasons i was like ‘THATS WHAT I SAID!!’ i posted a link to this on my fackebook page, i hope more people read this and realize how right u are, ugh twilight bugs me so much, thank you for sharing this wonderful writing,and i read the article where stephen king said stephenie meyers is a horrible author and im just like yes yes a million times yes, i love jkr and omg i hope twilight is destroyed

  686. Toodles
    Posted June 8, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    count chocula is more of a vampire than edward is.

    nuff said.

  687. hm
    Posted June 8, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    I feel terrible for Stephenie Meyer….I hate it when people start bashing HER. You can say what you don’t like about the book series, and you can rant about the ridiculously misled fandom, but Stephenie, as “poorly written” as Twilight is, put a lot of work into the books. It’s not her fault that this is the only kind of “literature” that my generation seems to want to read. She wrote them, a bunch of stupid girls fell for her characters.

  688. Rachel
    Posted June 8, 2009 at 8:19 pm

    All I have to say is “YES!!
    I would not blow my nose on the paper that failure of a piece of literature is printed on.

  689. TwilightHater
    Posted June 9, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    Holy crap! I hate Twilight! One of my friends will not stop talking about it, and it makes me not even want to talk to her. When I read the 1st book, I thought the series was alright, but i was dead wrong. It is the worst written, most boring, most predictable pice of crap I have unfortunately wasted time in my life reading. If Stephanie Meyer wants to be a good author, maybe she should take tips from people like J.K. Rowling. At least Harry Potter has fans other than stupid teenaged girls who need to get a life (and I even am a tennaged girl). This series was pretty much the biggest waste of time, effort, and money I have made in my life!

  690. Antibella
    Posted June 9, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    Thank you so much for making me laugh. I hate Twilight. Need I say more? I guess so.

    Twilight
    A sappy love story
    Bella is worse than Nancy Drew (no offense)
    Perfect yet stupid characters
    Do not read
    Cliche

  691. ILoveSS501
    Posted June 9, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    L0l @ hero jaejoong’s comment.
    Twilight sucks and the fan girls are just as stupid

  692. michele
    Posted June 9, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    Yeah, we get it, Twilight may not be the best piece of Literature ever written, but it certainly does not deserve all this hate. Well over half of your reasons make zero sense, and more people like the series, than dislike it. I’m not saying that the strange people who believe it, and live for the book are right, I’m just saying that you shouldn’t hate on it just because you didn’t enjoy it. Also, if you hate it so much, why write a long blog about it?

  693. Mary
    Posted June 9, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    terribly written, but addicting to read. & robert pattinson ;)

  694. Allie
    Posted June 9, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    I’m really disappointed. I googled “Twilight hate” to see what people who hate the series have to say about it. I found this site, and I was hoping/expecting that it would be legitimate, accurate, well thought out and well expressed reasons.

    Fail.

    Can’t you do any better? Please?

    I love the series, though I do have my own issues with it. Bella is pathetic in that she “cannot live without Edward.” I understand that when you love someone so much losing them can and probably will tear you apart, but you survive and life goes on. Not so for Bella, probably because she wrapped her life up in him. Edward is rash and selfish for trying to kill himself over Bella’s death, not caring about what that would do to his family. I’ll agree with you on those points, which you sort of hit. Oh, and I’ll also agree on #84 about Jacob. I prefer him over Edward because he’s so much more real, in my opinion. I can’t agree with you about much else. None of the characters are “perfect,” not in the slightest. I don’t know how you could have read the books and not realized that. You also contradict yourself by saying that they are perfect and then later saying that Edward is abusive, possessive, etc. Weird definition of perfect, no? Second, how can you say that “teens don’t fall in love that fast”?!? That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard! All teens do is “fall in love fast” and become infatuated with each other. Ha. Mm, there is much more I could say, but I’ll end with this. Stephen King’s opinion on her writing doesn’t count for much for two reasons. One, though he is a writer himself, that very fact makes him a little biased, and he is probably just a little irked that Stephenie Meyer is currently a more popular author than he is. Two, he is criticizing her as a writer, which Stephenie herself has not claimed to be. She has said that she does not consider herself a writer, but rather a storyteller. Sure, she isn’t the best writer ever, but her millions of fans (and dollars haha) say that she’s one hell of a storyteller. Haha. She’s a smart woman who has managed to make herself rich and famous while giving girls something to obsess over haha. And you might be surprised by how many men like the series too. I’ve had some interesting experiences with that (think a big-tough-middle-aged-biker-guy-Twilight-lover… yea).

    Rewrite this and give 95 legitimate reasons, please.

  695. Lani
    Posted June 10, 2009 at 9:26 am

    Live and let live… everyone is entitled to their own opinion… it’s human nature after all…

    I personally didn’t mind the books as a lark (something to read) but, I’m not treating the saga as the new testament or anything, unlike many on Yahoo Answers Mythology and Folklore section…

    But, you have to admit that love it or hate it by blogging about it you’re giving more fuel to the fire…

    As opinions go one man’s trash is another man’s treasure, and literature is quite the same…

  696. Annie (who loves twilight)
    Posted June 10, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    You are very, very wrong.
    You obviously have no emotion and are not prepared to suspend your disbelief.Whilst I admit Twilight is a VERY popular book at the moment and some people can become very obsessive and protective over it I think you are being extremly spiteful to a woman who has put all her love, passion, imagination and intelligence to a book which is a huge sucess. I believe you are jealous of her superb talent for words and I think her books hold a much deeper meaning than just a trashy high school romance, which is what you obviously think it is. Your bitterness towards her and her work is pretty offensive to say the least, your life must suck a lot for you to wake up one morning and think ” Yes, I’m going to post a blog stating 95 reasons why I hate Twilight!” It’s pretty sad don’t you think, that a person can be so sour to do this. And lastly, (you’ll be pleased to know) do you think you could write four books and still captivate audiences right till the very last page? No.
    You don’t have the heart, the sense, or the expertise to write even a page worthy of competing with Stephenie Meyer. Go to hell.

  697. My several cents
    Posted June 10, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    The Twilight craze has completely taken over the nation: the minds and Facebook profiles of teenaged girls across the country are consumed by this series of books and the accompanying movie, and it is really beyond understanding. Those who truly know good literature and what it entails cannot comprehend the attraction to these books, nor the obsession that so often results.
    Before the legions of angry Twilight defenders descend, hurling invective and claiming that no one has read the books can dare to criticize them, be aware that each one of the books has been read, cover to cover. And the books deserve every bit of legitimate criticism they receive.
    First and foremost, the characters themselves are appalling. Nobody in the entire world acts like the characters in this series, except in B-movies and romance novels. And girls, Edward is not that great. He’s paranoid, obsessive and controlling: sitting outside someone’s window while they sleep is not a romantic gesture. It’s stalking. Bella is what is known as a “Mary Sue”: a character written into a major role with her main purpose being wish fulfillment for the writer or readers (or both). Bella is not a well-developed character by any stretch of the imagination. Her main purpose is to narrate the story and complain about her life, allowing unhappy teenagers to insert their own personalities where Bella’s is left to be nonexistent, or annoying.
    As for the rest of the cast, the stereotypes are so obvious as to be sickening. The jealous “other man” (Jacob and apparently every other guy with whom Bella goes to school), the gooey best friends who contribute nothing but convenient interruptions to Bella’s musings on Edward, annoying parents and, in the case of these fantasy stories, slick, unlikeable but tempting villains. The list goes on and on, but the point is this: the characters are cardboard cutouts, destined to fall over at the first sign of a real plot line.
    And there is another problem: the story itself. Rarely, if ever, has a book (much less an entire series) been so contrived and poorly written that it really wasn’t worth finishing. Every book in the series follows the exact same narrative path, without changing a bit. A narrative arc is one thing; repeating it four times over many hundreds of pages is another.
    Meyer’s books are incredibly puerile in both content and form; they may be intended for younger audiences, but youth does not equal the inability to read complex stories or well-constructed sentences. Any stickler for proper grammar and good writing will be horrified at the sheer number of mistakes and poorly written sentences –even if the books were great, sloppy writing is sloppy writing, and it detracts from the work.
    The vampire genre itself is an old one, and many of the characteristics shown by Meyer’s cardboard lookalikes are nothing new. However, many of the traits are downright ridiculous when thought about (sparkly vampires? Really?). While holding onto a literary theme or motif for a long period of time can cause it to stagnate and become uninteresting, Meyer’s “innovations” on the vampire genre completely ignore any and all of what makes vampires so interesting. Her creations are emasculated, shiny and entirely too convenient for them to be the fascinating creatures promised by the series.
    One of the biggest issues with Meyer’s writing is her absolute inability to take a risk as an author. Nothing in real life works out as smoothly as it does in the Twilight series. The entire story line condenses into a simple, neat package, as easily put together as a four-piece puzzle, and about as interesting. Nothing goes wrong that is not remedied; no questions are left unanswered; no actual tragedy or real harm befalls any single character. No imagination or intelligence is required of the reader beyond the ability to read. When readers are left wishing that the villains had in fact killed a few of the main characters, something is not right.
    No story worth the acclaim Twilight has received should fall into place without even the slightest hitch. No books as long as these should leave the reader without anything to think about except how dreamy Edward is, or how much they wish they were Bella. Escapism is not a new tradition in writing, and it’s not without merit, but Twilight crosses over from “escapism” into “absolute pipe-dream.” Escapism can be lots of fun to read when it’s well done. Unfortunately for Twilight and its legions of fans, these books are not well done.
    In the end, there’s nothing wrong with sitting down and reading Twilight, if you don’t mind wasting several hours or days on a series of books not worth the paper on which they are printed. By all means, read and enjoy, drool over Edward, curse Jacob, revile the Volturi; that’s your prerogative. But stop insisting to the world that these are “the greatest books ever.” They aren’t.

  698. Katherine
    Posted June 10, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    AMEN! You put that perfectly.

  699. haha
    Posted June 10, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    u prob made a lot of money from publishing this on triond haha

  700. Me
    Posted June 11, 2009 at 8:09 am

    i have a friend who likes it.. i still don’t get it why.. but i guess all twilight fans are just immature girls, who dream of a white knight in … sparkly armor… they are pathetic.. i only saw the movie and i got so bored that i constantly used the forward arrow on my keyboard… boooooooooring…i would never read the book… not even if i would be alone on an island and it would be the only thing i have.. i would use it to light the fire instead…
    this is great! you are absolutely right about what you said..like you read my mind xD

  701. Posted June 11, 2009 at 10:56 am

    We just did a video about why Twilight stinks….. check it out here, send it to your friends:

  702. Posted June 11, 2009 at 10:58 am

    my embedded file didn’t work..here is the Anti-Twilight video direct link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kI4P4GyLYo

  703. MARLIN
    Posted June 11, 2009 at 11:32 am

    omggg ur funny…. i agree with everything loooooooooooooool……………..except for the light yagami part lool what does that got to do withg anything but stilll funny…. i am actually listening to the audio books and i am tottally hating it and i know then why am i still listening to it lol. i was actually trying to fathom why its such a big deal.. nd i am glad to know i am not the only one who feels that way lol.

    HERE ARE MORE REASONS I HATE TWILIGHT

    REASONG EDWARD CULLEN IS ANNOWING PIECE OF SHIT

    1. I will creepily watch Bella as she sleeps and eats cause that’s what ALL the cool kids do….

    2. I control my Bella and don’t let her do what she wants…even though she is pathetically stupid. Oh, was “my Bella” possessively sexist? Yes. Because it’s in the book folks, no denying it.

    3. SHE CAN’T SEE HER BEST FRIEND CAUSE I IS JEALOUS

    4. I’m extremely handsome. And the terms “marble cold body and melting topaz eyes” haven’t been used enough.

    5. We talk about the most boring shit, like me killing her. And then me asking her out. And then me warning her. But then asking her out again.

    6. I like Bella because of: …her smell and..and..yea there isn’t anything else is there?

    7. Left Bella and made her depressed for like half the book. Who even wants to read about that?

    8. Be more of a serious sally please.

    9. I’M AN OLD MAN PREYING ON A YOUNG GIRL
    Oh wait what? Definition? Pedophile. There we go.
    _______________________________

    REASONS WHY BELLA IS ANOTHERANNOWING BITCH

    1. OMG MI FAVOURITE CULOR ITS BROWNZ CUZ ITS BORINGS LYKE ME

    2. I hate my dad even though he lovingly sacrificed his daily life to let in a pubescent, hormonal, moody teenage girl.

    3. Everyone wants to be friends with me but I don’t want to be friends with them cause I like wallowing in my own sadness

    4. I do exactly the opposite of everything I’m told to do cause I know that way I’ll almost die and Edward will have to come save me… again.

    5. I trip on everything cause I know it makes teh boyz like me

    6. I get mad at the boy who almost killed me when he tries to apologize

    7. I think Renesmee is a good name

    8. I think Renesmee is a pronouncable name

    9. I likez the sex

    10. I made out with my daughter’s boyfriend… won’t THAT be an interesting bedtime story

    11. I have no appreciation for sex jokes.

    12. I think its sexy when boys tell me they want to kill me

    13. I’m just a pathetic boring shell with no personality whatsoever that was created so that fangirls could pretend they were me

    14. I am so antisocial i hate going to parties or hanging out with friends unless abosolutely nessecery.

    15. I hurl at the sight of blood yet i want to become a vampire.

    16. I would rather go out with a hot gye with no personlity rather than fun young gye full of spirit (warewolve) beacuse i am so shallow.

    17. it takes me more than half a year to get over a boy.

    Twilight sucks. Times infinity.
    Please feel free to add more reasons to the list.

    MORE THINGS WRONG WITH TWILIGHT

    1. Controlling boyfriends are okay, if they are hot.
    2. True love can be defined through hot boys and great smelling chicks.
    3. Making boys save you from all your problems is the right path to becoming a good and independent individual.
    4. Girls are all weak and need boys to come save them.
    5. Give up all of your dreams and goals (even if that DOES mean reading Wuthering Heights over and over) for a boy.
    6. Be mean to your dad.
    7. The Chief of Police is stupid and won’t be able to tell you are sneaking a boy into your room. So do it.
    8. Women are meant to be in the kitchen, because cooking it the only thing Bella knows how to do.
    9. Making out with your daughter’s bf is okay.
    10. Making out with someone else when you are engaged is also okay.
    11. Name your child Renesme and you won’t regret it.
    12. Refuse to have any friends at school because they aren’t good enough for you anyway.
    13. Killing yourself is okay, as long as it’s in the name of love.
    14. Date Edward Cullen. And then you too can marry him and have a crazy half-vampire kid that doesn’t exist.
    15. Vampires produce semen as well as venom
    16. The name of the books are nothing to do with the contents.
    17. Twilight sucks even the actors of the shit (however somehow box office hit) movie thinks so too. and i would act in a shit movie as well if i got paid 12 million dollars so i dont blame them.

  704. MARLIN
    Posted June 11, 2009 at 11:33 am

    omggg ur funny…. i agree with everything loooooooooooooool……………..except for the light yagami part lool what does that got to do withg anything but stilll funny…. i am actually listening to the audio books and i am tottally hating it and i know then why am i still listening to it lol. i was actually trying to fathom why its such a big deal.. nd i am glad to know i am not the only one who feels that way lol.

    HERE ARE MORE REASONS I HATE TWILIGHT

    REASONG EDWARD CULLEN IS ANNOWING PIECE OF SHIT

    1. I will creepily watch Bella as she sleeps and eats cause that\’s what ALL the cool kids do….

    2. I control my Bella and don\’t let her do what she wants…even though she is pathetically stupid. Oh, was \”my Bella\” possessively sexist? Yes. Because it\’s in the book folks, no denying it.

    3. SHE CAN\’T SEE HER BEST FRIEND CAUSE I IS JEALOUS

    4. I\’m extremely handsome. And the terms \”marble cold body and melting topaz eyes\” haven\’t been used enough.

    5. We talk about the most boring shit, like me killing her. And then me asking her out. And then me warning her. But then asking her out again.

    6. I like Bella because of: …her smell and..and..yea there isn\’t anything else is there?

    7. Left Bella and made her depressed for like half the book. Who even wants to read about that?

    8. Be more of a serious sally please.

    9. I\’M AN OLD MAN PREYING ON A YOUNG GIRL
    Oh wait what? Definition? Pedophile. There we go.
    _______________________________

    REASONS WHY BELLA IS ANOTHERANNOWING BITCH

    1. OMG MI FAVOURITE CULOR ITS BROWNZ CUZ ITS BORINGS LYKE ME

    2. I hate my dad even though he lovingly sacrificed his daily life to let in a pubescent, hormonal, moody teenage girl.

    3. Everyone wants to be friends with me but I don\’t want to be friends with them cause I like wallowing in my own sadness

    4. I do exactly the opposite of everything I\’m told to do cause I know that way I\’ll almost die and Edward will have to come save me… again.

    5. I trip on everything cause I know it makes teh boyz like me

    6. I get mad at the boy who almost killed me when he tries to apologize

    7. I think Renesmee is a good name

    8. I think Renesmee is a pronouncable name

    9. I likez the sex

    10. I made out with my daughter\’s boyfriend… won\’t THAT be an interesting bedtime story

    11. I have no appreciation for sex jokes.

    12. I think its sexy when boys tell me they want to kill me

    13. I\’m just a pathetic boring shell with no personality whatsoever that was created so that fangirls could pretend they were me

    14. I am so antisocial i hate going to parties or hanging out with friends unless abosolutely nessecery.

    15. I hurl at the sight of blood yet i want to become a vampire.

    16. I would rather go out with a hot gye with no personlity rather than fun young gye full of spirit (warewolve) beacuse i am so shallow.

    17. it takes me more than half a year to get over a boy.

    Twilight sucks. Times infinity.
    Please feel free to add more reasons to the list.

    MORE THINGS WRONG WITH TWILIGHT

    1. Controlling boyfriends are okay, if they are hot.
    2. True love can be defined through hot boys and great smelling chicks.
    3. Making boys save you from all your problems is the right path to becoming a good and independent individual.
    4. Girls are all weak and need boys to come save them.
    5. Give up all of your dreams and goals (even if that DOES mean reading Wuthering Heights over and over) for a boy.
    6. Be mean to your dad.
    7. The Chief of Police is stupid and won’t be able to tell you are sneaking a boy into your room. So do it.
    8. Women are meant to be in the kitchen, because cooking it the only thing Bella knows how to do.
    9. Making out with your daughter’s bf is okay.
    10. Making out with someone else when you are engaged is also okay.
    11. Name your child Renesme and you won’t regret it.
    12. Refuse to have any friends at school because they aren’t good enough for you anyway.
    13. Killing yourself is okay, as long as it\’s in the name of love.
    14. Date Edward Cullen. And then you too can marry him and have a crazy half-vampire kid that doesn\’t exist.
    15. Vampires produce semen as well as venom
    16. The name of the books are nothing to do with the contents.
    17. Twilight sucks even the actors of the shit (however somehow box office hit) movie thinks so too. and i would act in a shit movie as well if i got paid 12 million dollars so i dont blame them.

  705. MARLIN
    Posted June 11, 2009 at 11:34 am

    omggg ur funny…. i agree with everything loooooooooooooool……………..except for the light yagami part lool what does that got to do withg anything but stilll funny…. i am actually listening to the audio books and i am tottally hating it and i know then why am i still listening to it lol. i was actually trying to fathom why its such a big deal.. nd i am glad to know i am not the only one who feels that way lol.

    HERE ARE MORE REASONS I HATE TWILIGHT

    REASONG EDWARD CULLEN IS ANNOWING PIECE OF SHIT

    1. I will creepily watch Bella as she sleeps and eats cause that\\\\\\\’s what ALL the cool kids do….

    2. I control my Bella and don\\\\\\\’t let her do what she wants…even though she is pathetically stupid. Oh, was \\\\\\\”my Bella\\\\\\\” possessively sexist? Yes. Because it\\\\\\\’s in the book folks, no denying it.

    3. SHE CAN\\\\\\\’T SEE HER BEST FRIEND CAUSE I IS JEALOUS

    4. I\\\\\\\’m extremely handsome. And the terms \\\\\\\”marble cold body and melting topaz eyes\\\\\\\” haven\\\\\\\’t been used enough.

    5. We talk about the most boring shit, like me killing her. And then me asking her out. And then me warning her. But then asking her out again.

    6. I like Bella because of: …her smell and..and..yea there isn\\\\\\\’t anything else is there?

    7. Left Bella and made her depressed for like half the book. Who even wants to read about that?

    8. Be more of a serious sally please.

    9. I\\\\\\\’M AN OLD MAN PREYING ON A YOUNG GIRL
    Oh wait what? Definition? Pedophile. There we go.
    _______________________________

    REASONS WHY BELLA IS ANOTHERANNOWING BITCH

    1. OMG MI FAVOURITE CULOR ITS BROWNZ CUZ ITS BORINGS LYKE ME

    2. I hate my dad even though he lovingly sacrificed his daily life to let in a pubescent, hormonal, moody teenage girl.

    3. Everyone wants to be friends with me but I don\\\\\\\’t want to be friends with them cause I like wallowing in my own sadness

    4. I do exactly the opposite of everything I\\\\\\\’m told to do cause I know that way I\\\\\\\’ll almost die and Edward will have to come save me… again.

    5. I trip on everything cause I know it makes teh boyz like me

    6. I get mad at the boy who almost killed me when he tries to apologize

    7. I think Renesmee is a good name

    8. I think Renesmee is a pronouncable name

    9. I likez the sex

    10. I made out with my daughter\\\\\\\’s boyfriend… won\\\\\\\’t THAT be an interesting bedtime story

    11. I have no appreciation for sex jokes.

    12. I think its sexy when boys tell me they want to kill me

    13. I\\\\\\\’m just a pathetic boring shell with no personality whatsoever that was created so that fangirls could pretend they were me

    14. I am so antisocial i hate going to parties or hanging out with friends unless abosolutely nessecery.

    15. I hurl at the sight of blood yet i want to become a vampire.

    16. I would rather go out with a hot gye with no personlity rather than fun young gye full of spirit (warewolve) beacuse i am so shallow.

    17. it takes me more than half a year to get over a boy.

    Twilight sucks. Times infinity.
    Please feel free to add more reasons to the list.

    MORE THINGS WRONG WITH TWILIGHT

    1. Controlling boyfriends are okay, if they are hot.
    2. True love can be defined through hot boys and great smelling chicks.
    3. Making boys save you from all your problems is the right path to becoming a good and independent individual.
    4. Girls are all weak and need boys to come save them.
    5. Give up all of your dreams and goals (even if that DOES mean reading Wuthering Heights over and over) for a boy.
    6. Be mean to your dad.
    7. The Chief of Police is stupid and won’t be able to tell you are sneaking a boy into your room. So do it.
    8. Women are meant to be in the kitchen, because cooking it the only thing Bella knows how to do.
    9. Making out with your daughter’s bf is okay.
    10. Making out with someone else when you are engaged is also okay.
    11. Name your child Renesme and you won’t regret it.
    12. Refuse to have any friends at school because they aren’t good enough for you anyway.
    13. Killing yourself is okay, as long as it\\\\\\\’s in the name of love.
    14. Date Edward Cullen. And then you too can marry him and have a crazy half-vampire kid that doesn\\\\\\\’t exist.
    15. Vampires produce semen as well as venom
    16. The name of the books are nothing to do with the contents.
    17. Twilight sucks even the actors of the shit (however somehow box office hit) movie thinks so too. and i would act in a shit movie as well if i got paid 12 million dollars so i dont blame them.

  706. Posted June 11, 2009 at 11:36 am

    omggg ur funny…. i agree with everything loooooooooooooool……………..except for the light yagami part lool what does that got to do withg anything but stilll funny…. i am actually listening to the audio books and i am tottally hating it and i know then why am i still listening to it lol. i was actually trying to fathom why its such a big deal.. nd i am glad to know i am not the only one who feels that way lol.

    HERE ARE MORE REASONS I HATE TWILIGHT

    REASONG EDWARD CULLEN IS ANNOWING PIECE OF SHIT

    1. I will creepily watch Bella as she sleeps and eats cause that\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s what ALL the cool kids do….

    2. I control my Bella and don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t let her do what she wants…even though she is pathetically stupid. Oh, was \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\”my Bella\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\” possessively sexist? Yes. Because it\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s in the book folks, no denying it.

    3. SHE CAN\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’T SEE HER BEST FRIEND CAUSE I IS JEALOUS

    4. I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’m extremely handsome. And the terms \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\”marble cold body and melting topaz eyes\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\” haven\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t been used enough.

    5. We talk about the most boring shit, like me killing her. And then me asking her out. And then me warning her. But then asking her out again.

    6. I like Bella because of: …her smell and..and..yea there isn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t anything else is there?

    7. Left Bella and made her depressed for like half the book. Who even wants to read about that?

    8. Be more of a serious sally please.

    9. I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’M AN OLD MAN PREYING ON A YOUNG GIRL
    Oh wait what? Definition? Pedophile. There we go.
    _______________________________

    REASONS WHY BELLA IS ANOTHERANNOWING BITCH

    1. OMG MI FAVOURITE CULOR ITS BROWNZ CUZ ITS BORINGS LYKE ME

    2. I hate my dad even though he lovingly sacrificed his daily life to let in a pubescent, hormonal, moody teenage girl.

    3. Everyone wants to be friends with me but I don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t want to be friends with them cause I like wallowing in my own sadness

    4. I do exactly the opposite of everything I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’m told to do cause I know that way I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’ll almost die and Edward will have to come save me… again.

    5. I trip on everything cause I know it makes teh boyz like me

    6. I get mad at the boy who almost killed me when he tries to apologize

    7. I think Renesmee is a good name

    8. I think Renesmee is a pronouncable name

    9. I likez the sex

    10. I made out with my daughter\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s boyfriend… won\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t THAT be an interesting bedtime story

    11. I have no appreciation for sex jokes.

    12. I think its sexy when boys tell me they want to kill me

    13. I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’m just a pathetic boring shell with no personality whatsoever that was created so that fangirls could pretend they were me

    14. I am so antisocial i hate going to parties or hanging out with friends unless abosolutely nessecery.

    15. I hurl at the sight of blood yet i want to become a vampire.

    16. I would rather go out with a hot gye with no personlity rather than fun young gye full of spirit (warewolve) beacuse i am so shallow.

    17. it takes me more than half a year to get over a boy.

    Twilight sucks. Times infinity.
    Please feel free to add more reasons to the list.

    MORE THINGS WRONG WITH TWILIGHT

    1. Controlling boyfriends are okay, if they are hot.
    2. True love can be defined through hot boys and great smelling chicks.
    3. Making boys save you from all your problems is the right path to becoming a good and independent individual.
    4. Girls are all weak and need boys to come save them.
    5. Give up all of your dreams and goals (even if that DOES mean reading Wuthering Heights over and over) for a boy.
    6. Be mean to your dad.
    7. The Chief of Police is stupid and won’t be able to tell you are sneaking a boy into your room. So do it.
    8. Women are meant to be in the kitchen, because cooking it the only thing Bella knows how to do.
    9. Making out with your daughter’s bf is okay.
    10. Making out with someone else when you are engaged is also okay.
    11. Name your child Renesme and you won’t regret it.
    12. Refuse to have any friends at school because they aren’t good enough for you anyway.
    13. Killing yourself is okay, as long as it\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s in the name of love.
    14. Date Edward Cullen. And then you too can marry him and have a crazy half-vampire kid that doesn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t exist.
    15. Vampires produce semen as well as venom
    16. The name of the books are nothing to do with the contents.
    17. Twilight sucks even the actors of the shit (however somehow box office hit) movie thinks so too. and i would act in a shit movie as well if i got paid 12 million dollars so i dont blame them.

  707. emerald
    Posted June 12, 2009 at 6:38 am

    reference to pst about jacob being a peadopile. There is reasons human reasons about why people are attracted to younger people. Pick up a psychology book look for aguy called Freud and read about the Oedipus complex.

  708. Linz
    Posted June 12, 2009 at 8:07 am

    Ok so I’ll admit, I like Twilight.
    But I do agree with several of these points. While it has a fairly good plot line, Ms. Meyer’s actual writing skills aren’t that great. There are a lot of better writers out there who aren’t as famous/aren’t as rich/don’t get as much credit as her.
    But I do like the concept of being in love with a man who can always be there for you. Or something like that.
    And also, vampires are only stereotypically scary with fangs and burning in the sun. I like how Stefanie Meyer changed that.
    So I think i’m 50/50. I like the books but I agree with quite a lot of these reasons as to why they’re not good.

  709. jessica
    Posted June 12, 2009 at 8:22 am

    Hhahahahahahah. Absolutely hilarious and soooo true.

  710. Screw Vampires, I prefer Assassins
    Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:28 am

    BY THE WAY, BEFORE YOU READ THIS COMMENT– I am the author’s intended target. 14 year old girls. Go figure, huh?

    @Annie (who apparently loves twilight)

    Hater’s of twilight are not prepared to ’suspend their disbelief? How is that so? Just because we dislike twilight, why does that suddenly mean we hate vampires in general. I, in fact, am an avid fantasy reader, which includes vampires. Hellsing is my favorite vampire media at the moment, because it is awesome in a video format. I also enjoy books about Assassins. And magic. And magic Assassins.

    “I believe you are jealous of her superb talent for words ”
    No. No I am not. In fact, I read half the first book, and had to stop reading it was so bad. See, I didn’t bother reading all of it, because that was all I needed to know. Guess what? All of you, you’re loser claims fail to apply to me.
    Mayer can’t write decent literature. In fact, most of the books directed at teens are horribly put together. If you want something written WELL, go read something by Orson Scott Card. Or Brent Weeks. Hell, go pick up anything from the fantasy or sci-fi section, it is almost guaranteed to be written better.

    By the way, the main reason I hate Twilight is because it is so popular. That’s all. I’m not trying to be spiteful to Mayer, it is simply my opinion that her book was no-where near the level of her fame. It should not be that popular, because it is not good enough to deserve it.

    “do you think you could write four books and still captivate audiences right till the very last page? No.”

    YES. A WELL WRITTEN SERIES BY A GOOD AUTHOR CAN GIVE YOU 3 BOOKS OF 800 PAGES EACH, AND STILL LEAVE YOU CRAVING MORE. Another author can give you 3 trilogies in the same universe, and still have you craving more. Face it. ‘Twilight’ should not have been 4 books. Mayer failed to keep attention throughout those books.

    All you Twilight haters, face it. Give it up. Your opinion will never seep through the thick skull of Twilight. If you are so obviously bugged by such a book, it is a pretty good sign that your intelligence has surpassed the target audience. Stop perusing the Teen aisle. Nothing there will attract your interest.

  711. hates twilight so much
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 3:04 am

    its funny cause clearly all the characters in the book have issues and are EXTREMELY LAME there all retarded. And edward is such a stalker omg thats not romantics thats something you should file a law suit over TWILIGHT SUCKS

  712. Serena Belle
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 4:47 am

    If anyone wants to hear my opinion on Twilight, please keep reading. PS: It is not a good one, so all you “Twilighters” can go somewhere else

    I began reading The Twilight Series as I was writing a review on it at the Queensland Post about a year ago. Even now it remains the most pointless book I have ever read. In fact I’d rather watch grass die. Seriously, that’s how bad it is. It’s just another obbesession like The disney channel stars (whom I also hate) and is hugely overrated. Just like my hero, Stephen King says “Twilihgt isn’t worth a darn”.Hahaha. But honestly, my entire family, including my 13 year old sister, can’t stand it. The reason for my hatred is, that it doesn’t have any remote character, book or writing development, and the ending is cheesy and trashy, just like stinking Stephenie herself (BTW, you don’t spell it like THAT). It is written horribly and completely overrated which is a complete disrespect to other incredible authors who sadly have not sold much to this crappy plague. Twilight sucks, and needs to die. Like Edward Cullen, who is pervy, like Josef Fritzel.

  713. Forhuh?
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 10:20 am

    I hate twilight becuase it’s predictable and such a clche’. LIke no one has ever read a tragic love story containing “I love you, if you leave me I will die.” And then he leaves and she almost dies and guess what – he saves her. Wow, not predictable at all.

  714. forhuh?
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 10:49 am

    Also, if you guys really want a laugh, you should totally check out toxic_glorys writing journal on the internet. She used to be this total Twilight saga freak but she seems to be over it. Anyhoo, she wrote this piece called “my life as a teenage vampire.” It’s really rib cracking funny. Check it out.

  715. Twilight-Fun
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    This reasons are so stupid and uncorrect. The girl (people) who wrote this reasons seems to not understend at all twilight Saga. The only reason Bella has not future like they said, is because her future is Edward, and the only future she will have is with Edward because he is the love of her life – AND THAT’S WAY EVERYBODY LIKE IT – BECAUSE BELLA’S LIFE IS PERFECT WITH EDWARD. AND THE BEST FUTURE FOT HER IS – EDWARD.

    By the way, “Edward cant read Bella’s mind because she dont have one” – One more reason to say that the people who wrote this are so stupid. EVERYBODY has a mind, and if those people was trying to be funny by writing this – they so NOT.

    “It’s predictable, and childish.” – You are sure you have been reading Harry Potter? not seems like that, sorry.

    Vampires are displayed in this book just like other normal people, they are not like in other vampire storys – thats why it is original and interesting. Twilight dont need TOO MUCH animation help, it’s interesting without that too. (What i cant say about Harry Potter).

    “Bella Swan means beautiful swan, which is horribly cheesy.” – What can i say? Why do you think the most perfect guy fall in love with her? JEALOUS.

    “The only reason I kept reading was to see if Bella could redeem herself by getting over him.” – You are sure it’s the reason ? so then you readed “Eclipse”, and “Breaking Dawn”. Bella was trying to get over him only in “New Moon” and not in the other books, that Stephenie wrote later.

    “Do any guys actually like Twilight?” – Most of the guy’s dont like Twilight because they cant have the personality of Edward, and that’s what gils want them to have.

    “There is too much face touching.” – AND WE LIKE IT.

    “People think Meyer is the best writer ever.” – Here is a good reason why people should read read this book, and not a reason why they shouldnt.

    “People say that Twilight is better than Harry Potter. Guess what? WRONG.” – that’s not a reason too, only your point of view. GET OVER IT, there is too much people who like Twilight, no matter that you will say.

    “The book was so bad we wrote 95 reasons why we hate it.” – The book was so good that you tried to find 95 stupid and uncorrect reasons, you are just angry that its a so good book – you spend so many time on it to find mistakes, and you hate this book – if you didnt like the book, you woldent spend so much time on it – YOU ARE JUST SO IDIOTS THAT ITS FUNNY :D

    So get over it. Really, if you dont like it (OR IF YOU HATE IT) stop spending so much time on it.
    Concentrate yourself on Harry Potter that is “so good” like you are saying.

  716. Anonymous
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    I read the books and i like them, sure the storyline could have been better, and Bella could have had more going on in her life than just focusing on Edward and maybe they did fall in love too fast, it is one of the most predictable cliche’s but who are you to judge. Have you attempted writing a book, i think not. It must have been good enough that it was sent to be printed.

    You call Twilight fans sad but arent you the sad one that has all that time to write 95 reasons why you hate the series, most of which were repeated.

    I think dont think that 61,62,63 are real as they all seemed to invovle the same thing and if they were you have no idea if they were joking or not. Were you there with them?

    I think what youve done here is completely pointless. I get that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I really liked the series and yeh their not the best books that ive ever read, they do have their faults but im not so closed minded as to say that they were ‘horrible’. Maybe you should stop being so jealous and narrow minded and think how hard it is to write a book and then how mean it is for someone to critisize, not to give ways on how she could have improved it.

    I just think that your reasons are just pathetic. Whoah have written loads. Just gonna say, am off out, you see, i have a life.
    XD

  717. Anonymous
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    I meant to say that i think 61,62,63 ARENT real.

  718. Forhuh?
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    I have written a book, actually and i can tell you that what I can think up in a day is way more original than twilight. Still..i admire meyer for having the guts for writing garbish like this.

  719. Randomer who hates Twilight
    Posted June 14, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    This is freakin awesome and
    to person named fail
    umm Jasper is quite a common name especially for dogs xD
    and cats
    and rabbits.

    Twilight ruined the reputation of vampires.
    D:<
    it should BURN.
    I am really fed up of hearing about it and people going “Edward Cullen should totally be real!” uhh..no
    Yeah the names are quite common lol
    If she had to make it with vampires
    A) no sparkles
    B)they all like are evil and are out to kill everyone and be creepy
    C)the werewolves and them like properly fight all the time
    D)they don’t like people
    E)they are there to kill werewolves/be terrorists/suck blood not fall in love, get back to work D:<
    F)Did the author know anything about vampires when she wrote this or did she think it would go well with the story or what?!

    conclusion: This list is awesome and Twilight is a disgrace.

  720. I.Like.Twilight.
    Posted June 14, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    Man you guys need to grow up. Fine, you don’t like the book. But just think about how lame it just was to actually write 95 reasons for why you don’t like it.

  721. I.Hate.Twilight.
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 12:24 am

    Think of how lame it was that a Twilight-lover read 95 reasons why a Twilight-hater dislikes it.

  722. I.Hate.Twilight
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 12:28 am

    Oh, and ‘Randomer who hates Twilight’, I’ve happily burned the book with my best friend. Made a video of it, posted on Myspace ^_^
    Great fun to pass time =D

    Fact: Edward looks like a transvestite

  723. I.Still.Hate.Twilight.
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 12:48 am

    “YOU ARE JUST SO IDIOTS THAT ITS FUNNY”

    that made me laugh so hard I think I almost coughed up a lung. Everything that “Twilight-Fun” said. omg. LMFAO!!

    “Most of the guy’s dont like Twilight because they cant have the personality of Edward, and that’s what gils want them to have” Really? REALLY? I mean, is this girl for real?

    “The book was so good that you tried to find 95 stupid and uncorrect reasons, you are just angry that its a so good book – you spend so many time on it to find mistakes”
    because like this, it is HILARIOUS to find mistakes in writings by people who think they know everything.

    Sarah Rebecca, you were right. Almost all Twilight-Lovers have horrible grammar xDD

  724. ForHuH?
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 5:33 am

    It’s true though, twilight-lovers really do over react whenever someone just mentions the words I hate and Twilight in the same sentence. Haha, I just about crack upn whenevr somene does this. And really “You guys are just so idiots that it’s funny?” Grammar, chick, really. Btw, check out toxic_glory’s writing journal, it really is hilarious.

  725. I.Meh.Twilight.
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 11:43 am

    To I.Hate.Twilight.

    Too much effort to read reasons and posts so just read last couple. Think how lame it is that you read the 95 reasons, mocked someone else for reading them and are now being mocked yourself.

    SHAME!

    Just thought id say, i think the book was ok but there is no need for that kind of criticism so maybe everyone on here should grow up. Especially the sados that comment on other peoples comments as if their waiting their for them. *cough* YOU!

  726. Percy Jackson and The Olympians Fan
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    “Straight men sparkle?” XDD so true. My friend was explaining the book to my guy friend, and she was like “and, he SPARKLES! That’s so hot!” i cut in and said “How is that hot? its gay!” then she cut in and said “HOW IS THAT NOT HOT?” and my guy friend and I just laughed. omg, this list is freaking amazing!

    BTW, my name is promoting an AWESOME book series, that has action, adventure, and yes: drama and romance, but only, its done PROPERLY! Which reminds me, there is only one good thing about Stephanie Meyer:
    My friend (who likes Twilight) looked on Meyer’s blog, and SHE SPOKE HIGHLY ABOUT THIS SERIES! I know: i would run away if that so called “author” recommened it, but you know, oh well, its publicity. =]

  727. Kiki
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    dear JJ Twilight Freak,
    look if you hate the list, the is only one thing to do. GET UP AND WALK AWAY. Your not a loser, just walk away if youd hate it. PLZ.

  728. sibby
    Posted June 16, 2009 at 1:46 am

    Bella doesn’t try to commit suicide! She was cliff diving: read recreational activity. And Charlie does question her and doesn’t trust Edward.

  729. Helekelekele
    Posted June 16, 2009 at 6:38 am

    Percy Jackson? I’ve read all four books. It’s totally awesom. I love greek mythology. And BTW people, just because someone likes Twilight dosn’t mean you guys should give thme hell about it. Its probably a good thing that taste differs otherwise we’ll all be losers.

  730. Ellie
    Posted June 16, 2009 at 10:00 am

    I’ve gotten half way through the book and all I can say is there is alot of talking. My friend freaks so much about Edward and says ” OH MY GOSH HE’S COMING SOON I CAN FEEL IT!” Men are not going to just pop up like Edward. And won’t sparkle either. So if your going to wait for your “Edward”, he’s not coming =).

  731. Salem
    Posted June 16, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    I hate Twilight very much and love this list! To people who hate Twilight, try Moonlight- there’s violence, it doesn’t revolve around one person, it is sad and romantic at times and the female and male main character aren’t googoogaga oer eachother! Just for the heck of saying it: I burn Twilight books!

    No offense to Twilight lovers but you are INSANLY defensive. Please it’s just a book, let Stephanie Meyer defend herself.

    But to the people who are obsessed with the book: Get a life! God! Why does your life revolve around a fictional book! Please!

    What were you thinking Meyer! Sparkly vampires. . .

  732. Posted June 17, 2009 at 12:25 am

    OH MY GODNESS
    U R SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO RIGHT
    I COULD NOOOT PUT IT BETTER MYSELF
    I AM TOTALLY FORWARDING THIS 2 ALL THE T LOVERS I KNOW
    MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    I LOVE U SOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH
    I HOPE U BECOME RICH SOMEDAY AND DIE HAPPY
    I THOROUGLY ENJOYED READING THIS LOVELY THING

  733. Jon
    Posted June 17, 2009 at 4:25 am

    If you actually go back tp 1856 theres a book published in Italy exactly the same plot but diffrent names and locations. Isn\’t that so unexpected. =)

  734. Emily
    Posted June 17, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    I am 13 and I read the entire Twilight Saga. I enjoyed it. For some strange reason, there are many people who have this concept that anyone who loves twilight is an overobsessed teenage girl. Looking at many of the commenters resent the fact that someone has insulted Twilight, you may think this is true. Well it’s not. My mother, father, many of my classmates (Male and Female), And ALL of my teachers, two of them Male have read the series. I am not overobsessed. I am not crazy. I am a honor student with a 4.3 GPA and 127 point IQ and I love Twilight!!!

  735. MrGart
    Posted June 17, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    I thik You’r right. Who the hell does meyer thinks she is coming up with this kind of “Fecal Matter” and going against the whole concept of vampires. I mean to say that one or a special kind of vampire can walk on daylight is one thing, but no lets make’em sparkle WTf is wrong with you woman.

  736. MrGart
    Posted June 17, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    By the way to like this or not is no a matter of IQ. im not an honor student nore is my Gpa so high. But Mi IQ is of 132. i read the books twice each. Its a matter of principles. This book goes against every concept of vampires i personally like vampires i found them misterious and cool and elegant Twilight has destroyed tha for me with how gay they look and weird. You know another thing i like. Women i’m a male 16 year old and i was raised by my mother so i respect women very much and this book basically states that women are rather to stupid or to weak to survive on their own. Newflash people THey’r not. i Think in this case Burning books isn’t so bad

  737. rachel cullen
    Posted June 17, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    this was the most pointless piece of s**t i’ve ever seen.
    Not only was it biased, but it was extremely reptitve and moreover WRONG!!

  738. Joelle
    Posted June 18, 2009 at 3:42 am

    i Totally agree
    it mainly the old lady who die over him
    and those cheeses saying like ” Bite me ”
    OMG

  739. ashl
    Posted June 18, 2009 at 4:00 am

    omg!my world is complete.people actully hating on twighlight yes!ive never read the book and never will it trash i would buy it to burn it

  740. Helekelekele
    Posted June 18, 2009 at 11:58 am

    Walalala. Twilight wasn’t so bad. I don’t like it, but other people seem to enjoy it. I guess its mainly because of Mr Cullen/Mason. I hope Meyer is making a lot of money because of teenage obsession. Basically, if you make the main character in a book hot, gorgeouse and immortal, you will be famous for creating such a beautiful piece of fictional art. haha.

  741. Isabella
    Posted June 19, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    I hate everyone who hates Twilight. It’s fair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Also if it where not for Sthephanie Meyer I’d be stuck reading boring books like Harry Potter. And twilight is a whole darn better than Harry Potter. Not to be mean to J.K.Rowling but it’s the turth !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! those reasons are stupid to hate twilight even the fangirl one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  742. Isabella
    Posted June 19, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    I think you twilight haters have something wrong your heads, maybe its this BS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HOW COULD YOU HATE THEM. Stephanie Meyer HAS A WONDERFUL BRAIN AND YOU TWILGHT HATERS HATE HER FOR THAT. GET MY POINT YOU FROM THIS WEBSITE JUST TO HATE STEPHANIE MEYER AND WONDERFUL BOOKS JUST TO HATE HER. YOU PEOPLE ARE SO SUTPID . AND WATCH IT I SPEAK FOR ALL TWILIGHT FANS
    P.S Bella dose have a brain you just don’t

  743. bored
    Posted June 19, 2009 at 11:28 pm

    do you people have a better website to be on!!! Do somthing ulse, kiss a girl. Sleep on the tolit. Scream!!!!!!!!!!! Get constupated .
    By the way I really don’t how I got here but I bored. Hey I was this wondering if anyone of you have a heart to get of this website and just do something eles. And I’ll be on for a bit. So please talk to me. call me bored beacase I’am bored. By the way what is this website?

  744. bored
    Posted June 19, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    why dosen’t anyone answer me? I am going to bed see you peuple later!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  745. Blue
    Posted June 20, 2009 at 2:58 am

    I couldnt agree more

    ” The books aren’t well written, just because every other word is a fancy adjective doesn’t make it good writing.”

    aha that is so true, it reminds me of my friend

    haha
    and straight men dont sparkle
    that was really funny

    i tried to read 60 pages of it, while driving to nevada. I tried to like it. everyone else did.
    but i didnt.

  746. Avital
    Posted June 20, 2009 at 3:13 am

    i agree

  747. Tasha
    Posted June 20, 2009 at 5:58 am

    It think that’s just down right disrespectful. So you didn’t enjoy the book, some people did, including me, so just get off Stephenie’s back. I’d like to see you try and write a novel as brilliant as hers. The evidence’ll be the paycheck, dear.

  748. twilight sucks arse
    Posted June 20, 2009 at 11:39 am

    i hate twilight. it takes half the book for the plot to go anywhere.

    ive seen about 98 girls wearing tops that say I LOVE EDWARD o_O…what edward..of coarse EDWARD CULLEN :@ . no one paid attention to the book before the movie came out. girls everywhere are saying I LOVE EDWARD!!!….HES A FICTIONAL CHARACTER LIKE SERIOUSLY GROW UP!

    thank you.

  749. twilightsucks
    Posted June 20, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    lawlz. i died laughing reading this. im going to print it for my friends xD
    twilight sucked ass and the movie was even worse. honestly, harry potter is waaaaaay better. Dude, i had to say this- Twilight fun? What you said before made me fall over laughing:
    “Do any guys actually like Twilight?” – Most of the guy’s dont like Twilight because they cant have the personality of Edward, and that’s what gils want them to have.
    PFFFFFFTTT! yea RIIIIIGHT!!!! okaii, so the guys that dont read twilight want to stalk theircrushes that they fell in love with in less than a month? umm….no. Edward is a perverted stalker who is conviniently a pedophile also.
    and the person who wrote this was soooo right about the fangirls of twilight having no proper grammar. they all make up random words that are inproper or dont exist -snorts- i, for one, hate improper grammar. i am a writer myself, so it irks me
    i cant believe how many people (girls with no lives….) obsess over this! its like….Edward is FICTIONAL, you cannot marry him, you cannot have his freakish not-so-sparkly baby, and live happily ever after for eternity as a vampire! get OVER yourselves!
    also, please tell m how a twilight FAN stumbles upon a list of 95 resons why twilight SUCKED?!?! really, they have no lives. i hate flamers- they look for things to criticze just for the sake of doing it. they say we have no lives? if we dont then….it must be horrible for them.
    anyways, you are a true master mind (straight men dont sparkle…teehee) i agree 100%. nice work

    p.s……twilight sucks xD

  750. bored
    Posted June 20, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    Hello is anyone on???????????????????????????

    Talk to me.

    Hey I read twilight!

    It’s long.

    Thats how come I don’t like it.

    Do you like Twilight?

  751. bored
    Posted June 20, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    Well if anyone bored.

    Just leave… but frist please, please, please tell me!!! I’ll be on for about… til 2:20

    Remeber I’ll be bored!

    Well what our you wanting for talk to me about Twilight!

    I want get mad!

  752. I AGREE
    Posted June 21, 2009 at 4:53 am

    Lol!!
    I havn\’t read the books, but I\’ve seen the movie. Just over an hour ago I watched \”Interview with a Vampire\” and I looked back on Twilight and just laughed. I mean, I really agree with the whole \”twist\” thing to make a story more interesting, but sparkling vampires? You can twist them a bit, but I think you should still stick with the main points about vampires. The first people to pick this book up knew vampires.
    As I said before, I haven\’t read it. But telling from these points, I can see that this book focuses on fellings and emotions of a female rather than the actual story. That\’s why people love it, they get pleasure from reading it. A good book has a good storyline, keeps it going, has good development. I hate Mary Sue characters. And that thing with Jacob being dumped, good point. What kind of moral is that?
    I don\’t hate Twilight because of it\’s flaws (even though they just make me laugh) but the FANGIRLS!! EVERY time you mention vampires, it\’s always Twilight. I honestly loved vampires BEFORE Twilight. I like the type from that movie I mentioned. Count Dracula type is ok, though a little sterotypical. Gothic vampires are the way to go! I also heard (not sure if it\’s true) that Meyer didn\’t even know much about vampires when she wrote it. i don\’t despise her at all, she did her best and was succesful, I congradulate her on that. It\’s just the fangirls, honestly. THE WORLD ISN\’T TWILIGHT.
    Also there\’s a lot of authors that I think \”Hey, I can do better than that\” and I can, if I took the time to. Meyer is one of those. I don\’t care if I\’m not as successful, as long as I write some good literature.
    To the fangirls, try looking at some quality vampire stuff. You\’ll see why we dispise the Twilight vampires.
    And only one point I don\’t agree on; number 70. Come on, fictional characters can be hot! It\’s just the obsession part thats a little weird…
    (and lol, light yagami part! XD)

  753. Shelby
    Posted June 21, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    Um.. all i have to say is that these reasons are NOT true! everyone has their own opinions and some of these reasons cant even be called reasons! one reason you stated was that there was too much face touching, well if you dont like romance then dont read it. also, bella talks about edward 24/7- so? if your in love, or if anyone falls in love then they would talk about them 24/7. you obviously dont know what real love is about. did you even read the book? because i dont agree with you. thats my opinion.
    P.S – dont say the book has a terrible plot because at least she knows how to write a book, a CONVINCING ONE.

  754. jinx
    Posted June 21, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    thank God someone made this

  755. Phil
    Posted June 21, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    If anyone didn’t like his reasons, read this http://bookstove.com/fantasy/why-i-hate-twilight/ it explains everything.

  756. Get-a-life!
    Posted June 22, 2009 at 9:16 am

    I don’t get it. Why are there twilight lovers on a website called “Why I hate Twilight.”? It makes no sense. And also, people who don’t like twilight have lives, their’s just don’t revolve around EDWARD-FREAKEN-CULLEN. So, he’s supposed to be hot, Chase Crawford is hot too, you don’t see people falling over him. And by the WAY, Chase Crawford is an actual person who is alive and non fictional.

    I think Edward is gay and is using bella as a cover story. Make sense? I don’t know, comment if you will. Also, the movie sucked. None of the actors had any emotion, like, AT-FREAKEN-ALL. I live in South-Arica (yes, people in Africa can read) and the people over here didn’t pay any attention to the book at all until the sucky movie came out.When I walk around school I see people walking around with the book everywehre where two years ago it was just another book with too many pages.

    Haha. Well, whatever. The person who wrote this website, you are a legend. Twilight fans who piss in their pants because of it, GET A FREAKEN LIFE. it’S SO NOT THAT HARD.

    Cioa people.

  757. Elyssa
    Posted June 22, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    I read Twilight and then i stopped. One it’s a shallow unorginal plot. Yay yet another vampire story because we haven’t read those before! But no she then decides to put a feud between vampires and werewolves. How orginal.

    On one of them (i can’t remember which my friends read this crap) it prattles on about Bella being depressed without Edward for the first half of the bloody book. Then lets commit suicide because he’s not around. (Crazy Ex-Girlfriend?)

    I mean even anime fans don’t cry themselves to sleep at night because Sasuke or Lelouch aren’t real. (And that’s saying something if you’re more crazy than a Sasuke fan girl!)

    Bottom line: Read a real vampire story. Read Anne Rice! Or atleast a story with a plot and actual (believable) characters.

    (I’m ashamed to say ALL my friends read and loved this stuff)

  758. Ivy
    Posted June 22, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    I HATE U, U HAD NO RIGHT TO MAKE THIS!!! IF U HATED IT SO MUCH, THEN Y DID U CONTINUE TO READ THE SERIES!?!? ALL U WANT IS SOME ATTENION!!! THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO GET IT! I AM NOT INSANE, AND USING INPROPER CAPITALAZTION IS SHORTER WAY OF WRITING NOWA DAYS! US,TWILIGHT FANS HAVE THE RIGHT TO LOVE WHAT WE WANT , U R A RUDE STUCK UP PERSON , GET A LIFE AND STOP MAKING STUPID LITTLE ESSAYS ABOUT AWESOME BOOKS UR JELOUS OF, GROW UP!!

  759. Caitlyn
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 12:33 am

    I HATE U, U HAD NO RIGHT TO MAKE THIS!!! IF U HATED IT SO MUCH, THEN Y DID U CONTINUE TO READ THE SERIES!?!? ALL U WANT IS SOME ATTENION!!! THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO GET IT! I AM NOT INSANE, AND USING INPROPER CAPITALAZTION IS SHORTER WAY OF WRITING NOWA DAYS! US,TWILIGHT FANS HAVE THE RIGHT TO LOVE WHAT WE WANT , U R A RUDE STUCK UP PERSON , GET A LIFE AND STOP MAKING STUPID LITTLE ESSAYS ABOUT AWESOME BOOKS UR JELOUS OF, GROW UP!!

    ——-

    I am so sorry, but I couldn’t help but laugh at this comment. Talk about hypocrisy. You claim not to be insane despite using all capitals, but just because you claim not to be proves nothing. I could say I’m not a girl, but I think anyone who looked between my legs could tell differently. It is easier to take the side of someone not freaking out against an opinion such as you, because it shows a sense of clarity in their own logic and reasoning as you clearly lack. You yell at the person posting this because you say they have no right, but if you have a write to like something, they have every right to disagree. So what if I said you have no right to post what you just said? I think you’d disagree with me immensely. It’s called freedom of speech hon. You’re right, Twilight fans have the right to love what they want as anyone does, just as anyone else has the right to hate what they want. The door swings both ways. As you put it, you can “get a life” and stop wasting your time on things you know you won’t agree with. If you are a die hard Twilight fan, you know you are going to get irritated by reading something titled “Why I Hate Twilight.” No jealousy involved, but a simple matter of stating an opinion. As for why they kept reading, check number 30: “We read the entire series just to laugh at the stupidity of it. ” I think that clarifies it. If you hate this list so much…why would you keep reading it?

    Oh, and if you want people to take you seriously. Stop being insane or lazy, which ever is behind the excessive use of capital letters, so that people won’t automatically assume you to be a close minded Twilight fan. Though we may write or verbalize our contempt for the book, we respect that you have every right to love it. You don’t see this person going to pro-Twilight fan sites and bashing all the Twilighters out there. Those who do go and do that are just as close minded as you are, but it seems there are far less of those insane anti-Twilighters than there are insane pro-Twilighters. In addition to this advice, work on proper syntax and grammar and maybe we might not consider you some Edward obsessed teenager who conforms to the desire of traits romanticized in something as Twilight rather than using your own mind to realize what you really want in life outside of a fictional vampire of perfection.

    Have a nice day.

  760. tish
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 1:37 am

    Okay some of the reasons are lame but they are funny. Personally i have no fondness for twilight but worse things have been written. I think people should just leave it the heck alone so it will fade away and i won’t have to hear anything more about it but that wont happen anytime soon with another movie coming out. Time to buy some more asprin and leave the tv and computer off.

  761. LauraLaura
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 5:16 am

    Ha you call meyer repetitive. How many times do you have to mention you don’t like sparkles. This is just about the most ridiculous list i have read. You could have summed up your opinions in maximum twenty points. I know its your opinion, but it kind of gets pathetic towards the end and it really shows how cynical you are. Stop taking things to seriously. Chill out. Breathe. Be happy.

  762. LauraLaura
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 5:31 am

    what i don’t understand, among many things, is whether or not the purpose of this, erm, list, was to take the piss out of twilight or the fans themselves. Its not your opinion on twilight that annoys me, i get it, you hate it. But it is the fact that you had the time to come up with over 90 points on why you hate it, most of which dont even make sense! You criticize the names! Come on, is that the best you can do. Mock the names Bella, Edward, Alice, Jasper, etc.

  763. Posted June 23, 2009 at 5:55 am

    ok i have read the twilight saga. and i loved it but i still lmao when i read this because if u look at it in a certian way any way. i agree that some fans go overbored with it and they need 2 chill. in my opinion they r some of the best books i have read much better than The Hobbit u i hate that book read the whole book and cant rember anything about it. every 1 has there opinion and every 1 has a right 2 like and hate what the want 2. but i dont think it is right 2 put a bunch of trash about a book just because u didnt like it and yes i do know 2 guys that like twilight well 1 of them is gay in mine and my friends opinion. anyway. these books r not 4 every1 and niether r ur precious harry potter even though i like harry potter too. and 4 stephiene meyer messing up vampires i think that it makes the story unique. because if it is just another stupid ordinary vampire story i would probavally hate it.

  764. Brinna-E-mail a sane Twilighter
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 7:35 am

    Okay, at least read this all the way through, ok?
    Reasons 1/2: Bella being clumsy doesn’t really matter.
    3: I agree that she’s pretty useless sometimes.
    4: She did not attempt to commit suicide, she was cliff diving for a thrill.
    5: Meyer is a mother of three, and it’s fine to hate her books, but you don’t have to hate her as a person.
    6: She openly admits that she’s not a writer, she had a dream, started writting and it became a book, and she is very modest about it.
    7: What if the first person who thought about writing vampires didn’t do it because it wasn’t “the way things were”?
    8: She doens’t even put herself in with the authers
    9: I’m with you on that one. I think that loving a story is great, but you should also still live your life.
    10: Hahaha, well yes, but that happens in most stories.
    11: He has many flaws, only Bella is so blinded by her love that she can’t see them. He knows how flawed he is.
    12: Bella is supposed to be a plain character, but I still disagree.
    13: Hahaha….because all the Forks highschool boys are hormonal and will take anything new.
    14: You could say the same thing about Juliet.
    15: Some parents are like that, but that is true that it’s awfully convienient. Then again, that’s probably why it’s fiction.
    16: It’s true, I do wish that she had developed the characters more.
    17: Bella’s just really bad at everything, like with being clummsy and all that. She can’t help that.
    18: Everyone has they’re personal oppinions.
    19: It does sound creepy, and in Midnight Sun (Edward’s story) he is thinking the same thing. But if they had been dating at the time, it wouldn’t have been creepy to people.
    20: It can be cheesy at times. Of course! Almost all stories have they’re moments.
    21: Stephenie Meyer has her own way of writting.
    22: What? You’re not allowed to like both? Well better kill me than.
    23: Bella is very obsorbed in her love interest.
    24: There are flaws in everything.
    25: Jacob: ‘You don’t worry about the fangs?” Bella: “Shut up Jacob! You know he doesn’t have fangs!”–Eclipse, page 218.
    26: I think it’s cool that she has her own version of vampires. If people never went against the grain, vampires wouldn’t have even been written about.
    27: ‘”Bella,” my mom said to me as I got on the plain.’ Twilight, page 4.
    28: I like face touching. :(
    29: So are most every story. It’s called forshadowing.
    Real 30: Haha. Well I hope you en joyed it. lol
    31: What should she have named them? Begarth, and Nalton? Maybe she just liked those names.
    32: I agree with that, it doesn’t make sense that he can’t sweat, he can’t cry, but he can impregnant.
    33: That’s your opinon and you are allowed to voice it.
    34: Some poeple also believe that Robert Pattinson is in love with them. That doesn’t effect the story at all.
    35: Sometimes.
    36: Well, all stories have something in common with others.
    37: You have a better idea? What’s so bad about that?
    38: You can make fun of anything. Jesus is really easy to make fun of too. lol
    39: The book wasn’t made for ten year olds.
    40: It’s hard to fit everything in. And the story wasn’t about them.
    41: Other people’s actions shouldn’t make one bit of differance in what YOU like or don’t.
    42: Fangirls go overboard a lot. Still, what differance does it make to YOU liking or disliking something?
    43: Stephen King is not god. Who cans what he thinks? look at answer above.
    44: Good reason.
    43: Okay then. lol
    44: That makes no sense.
    45: Meyer never even thought of herself as a writer, she just wrote a book and people loved it. A LOT.
    46: You’ve repeated this reason many times.
    47: Oh no!
    48: Hahahaha! Well that’s a good reason. Funny one though.
    49: I know many actually.
    50: Most books/movies do that.
    51: Actually teenagers fall in love the most quickly. But I think you’re right about it all happening so fast. But that’s kind of the plot. Maddly in love and all that.
    52: Hahahaha! You’re funny. :D
    53: Haha. That’s not what she Meyer was saying at all.
    54: I know what you mean. I really wish that some of these fan girls would just give it a rest. Even worse then that though is the fact that a lot of them think that Robert Pattinson (Edward Cullen) is actually the character he plays. Hense him being attacked by screaming fangirls (aka stalkers) dayly.
    55: Actually she’d been there for two.
    http://stepheniemeyer.com/pdf/midnightsun_partial_draft4.pdf
    Page 106-110.
    56: If you read Twilight, Bella notices that Rosalie and Emmett look too old to be in highschool, and he didn’t change Alice or Jasper, Esme’s not a teen, so only Edward.
    57-61: I agree with that very much. It’s no wonder you hate it when these are the only kinds of Twilight fans you’ve spoken too. I don’t think that it is right at all to threaten someone’s life just for voicing they’re oppinions. I don’t hate you, and I don’t disrespect you simply because you don’t like Twilght. Infact, I would love to hear you’re response to this, so e-mail me at brinna_drew@yahoo.com please.
    62: haha. Interesting theory.
    63: o.O ? lol
    64: If I were him I’d do the same thing. Hahaha.
    65: Hahahaha. I really do think that Stephenie Meyer is a good person, no matter how much you hate her books/fans.
    66: Vampire vs Werewolf is a classic.
    67: I agree. There’s nothing wrong with reading, loving and even obsessing a little over fictional things. But when it interfears with your life, it’s a problem.
    68: I disagree, but again, your oppinion is yours to voice.
    69: Well, thats the whole point of the story, she’s so in love that she doesn’t even care about herself anymore.
    70: Some people are so insane…..:(
    71: That may be true. I just hate it when someone likes Twilight because it’s so popular, or hates it because of the fans behind it.
    72: Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! rotl
    73: *sigh* that’s the point when you need to look at your life and say “what the hell happened?!”
    74: Hahaha. He doesn’t age. So he’s actually younger than him. She’s the pedophile. hahaha.
    75: Again, you kind of repeat yourself in this thing. :)
    76: I always hated Jacob for that. :(
    77: That is so lame. haha.
    78: Hahahaha. I doubt it.
    79: Repeat again.
    80: Love is a funny thing.
    81: He made her kiss him, abandened her because she loved vampires, and fell for her infent child. He’s not perfect either.
    82: sigh.
    83: Hahaha.
    84: Thats no reason not to read them.
    85: Again, I agree.
    86: Other peoples oppinions don’t change mine.
    87: Nice.
    88: Good reasons.
    89: WTF? He wouldn’t approve of a lot of things.
    90: Personal opinion.
    91: Look above.
    92: lol
    Okay, that’s my arrgument. lol
    E-mail me please and tell me your opinion.
    I think you sound nice and I’m not going to hate you just because you hate something I like a lot.

  765. Brinna
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 7:36 am

    Okay, at least read this all the way through, ok?
    Reasons 1/2: Bella being clumsy doesn\’t really matter.
    3: I agree that she\’s pretty useless sometimes.
    4: She did not attempt to commit suicide, she was cliff diving for a thrill.
    5: Meyer is a mother of three, and it\’s fine to hate her books, but you don\’t have to hate her as a person.
    6: She openly admits that she\’s not a writer, she had a dream, started writting and it became a book, and she is very modest about it.
    7: What if the first person who thought about writing vampires didn\’t do it because it wasn\’t \”the way things were\”?
    8: She doens\’t even put herself in with the authers
    9: I\’m with you on that one. I think that loving a story is great, but you should also still live your life.
    10: Hahaha, well yes, but that happens in most stories.
    11: He has many flaws, only Bella is so blinded by her love that she can\’t see them. He knows how flawed he is.
    12: Bella is supposed to be a plain character, but I still disagree.
    13: Hahaha….because all the Forks highschool boys are hormonal and will take anything new.
    14: You could say the same thing about Juliet.
    15: Some parents are like that, but that is true that it\’s awfully convienient. Then again, that\’s probably why it\’s fiction.
    16: It\’s true, I do wish that she had developed the characters more.
    17: Bella\’s just really bad at everything, like with being clummsy and all that. She can\’t help that.
    18: Everyone has they\’re personal oppinions.
    19: It does sound creepy, and in Midnight Sun (Edward\’s story) he is thinking the same thing. But if they had been dating at the time, it wouldn\’t have been creepy to people.
    20: It can be cheesy at times. Of course! Almost all stories have they\’re moments.
    21: Stephenie Meyer has her own way of writting.
    22: What? You\’re not allowed to like both? Well better kill me than.
    23: Bella is very obsorbed in her love interest.
    24: There are flaws in everything.
    25: Jacob: \’You don\’t worry about the fangs?\” Bella: \”Shut up Jacob! You know he doesn\’t have fangs!\”–Eclipse, page 218.
    26: I think it\’s cool that she has her own version of vampires. If people never went against the grain, vampires wouldn\’t have even been written about.
    27: \’\”Bella,\” my mom said to me as I got on the plain.\’ Twilight, page 4.
    28: I like face touching. :(
    29: So are most every story. It\’s called forshadowing.
    Real 30: Haha. Well I hope you en joyed it. lol
    31: What should she have named them? Begarth, and Nalton? Maybe she just liked those names.
    32: I agree with that, it doesn\’t make sense that he can\’t sweat, he can\’t cry, but he can impregnant.
    33: That\’s your opinon and you are allowed to voice it.
    34: Some poeple also believe that Robert Pattinson is in love with them. That doesn\’t effect the story at all.
    35: Sometimes.
    36: Well, all stories have something in common with others.
    37: You have a better idea? What\’s so bad about that?
    38: You can make fun of anything. Jesus is really easy to make fun of too. lol
    39: The book wasn\’t made for ten year olds.
    40: It\’s hard to fit everything in. And the story wasn\’t about them.
    41: Other people\’s actions shouldn\’t make one bit of differance in what YOU like or don\’t.
    42: Fangirls go overboard a lot. Still, what differance does it make to YOU liking or disliking something?
    43: Stephen King is not god. Who cans what he thinks? look at answer above.
    44: Good reason.
    43: Okay then. lol
    44: That makes no sense.
    45: Meyer never even thought of herself as a writer, she just wrote a book and people loved it. A LOT.
    46: You\’ve repeated this reason many times.
    47: Oh no!
    48: Hahahaha! Well that\’s a good reason. Funny one though.
    49: I know many actually.
    50: Most books/movies do that.
    51: Actually teenagers fall in love the most quickly. But I think you\’re right about it all happening so fast. But that\’s kind of the plot. Maddly in love and all that.
    52: Hahahaha! You\’re funny. :D
    53: Haha. That\’s not what she Meyer was saying at all.
    54: I know what you mean. I really wish that some of these fan girls would just give it a rest. Even worse then that though is the fact that a lot of them think that Robert Pattinson (Edward Cullen) is actually the character he plays. Hense him being attacked by screaming fangirls (aka stalkers) dayly.
    55: Actually she\’d been there for two.
    http://stepheniemeyer.com/pdf/midnightsun_partial_draft4.pdf
    Page 106-110.
    56: If you read Twilight, Bella notices that Rosalie and Emmett look too old to be in highschool, and he didn\’t change Alice or Jasper, Esme\’s not a teen, so only Edward.
    57-61: I agree with that very much. It\’s no wonder you hate it when these are the only kinds of Twilight fans you\’ve spoken too. I don\’t think that it is right at all to threaten someone\’s life just for voicing they\’re oppinions. I don\’t hate you, and I don\’t disrespect you simply because you don\’t like Twilght. Infact, I would love to hear you\’re response to this, so e-mail me at brinna_drew@yahoo.com please.
    62: haha. Interesting theory.
    63: o.O ? lol
    64: If I were him I\’d do the same thing. Hahaha.
    65: Hahahaha. I really do think that Stephenie Meyer is a good person, no matter how much you hate her books/fans.
    66: Vampire vs Werewolf is a classic.
    67: I agree. There\’s nothing wrong with reading, loving and even obsessing a little over fictional things. But when it interfears with your life, it\’s a problem.
    68: I disagree, but again, your oppinion is yours to voice.
    69: Well, thats the whole point of the story, she\’s so in love that she doesn\’t even care about herself anymore.
    70: Some people are so insane…..:(
    71: That may be true. I just hate it when someone likes Twilight because it\’s so popular, or hates it because of the fans behind it.
    72: Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! rotl
    73: *sigh* that\’s the point when you need to look at your life and say \”what the hell happened?!\”
    74: Hahaha. He doesn\’t age. So he\’s actually younger than him. She\’s the pedophile. hahaha.
    75: Again, you kind of repeat yourself in this thing. :)
    76: I always hated Jacob for that. :(
    77: That is so lame. haha.
    78: Hahahaha. I doubt it.
    79: Repeat again.
    80: Love is a funny thing.
    81: He made her kiss him, abandened her because she loved vampires, and fell for her infent child. He\’s not perfect either.
    82: sigh.
    83: Hahaha.
    84: Thats no reason not to read them.
    85: Again, I agree.
    86: Other peoples oppinions don\’t change mine.
    87: Nice.
    88: Good reasons.
    89: WTF? He wouldn\’t approve of a lot of things.
    90: Personal opinion.
    91: Look above.
    92: lol
    Okay, that\’s my arrgument. lol
    E-mail me please and tell me your opinion.
    I think you sound nice and I\’m not going to hate you just because you hate something I like a lot.

  766. Brinna
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 7:42 am

    Okay, at least read this all the way through, ok?
    Reasons 1/2: Bella being clumsy doesn\\\’t really matter.
    3: I agree that she\\\’s pretty useless sometimes.
    4: She did not attempt to commit suicide, she was cliff diving for a thrill.
    5: Meyer is a mother of three, and it\\\’s fine to hate her books, but you don\\\’t have to hate her as a person.
    6: She openly admits that she\\\’s not a writer, she had a dream, started writting and it became a book, and she is very modest about it.
    7: What if the first person who thought about writing vampires didn\\\’t do it because it wasn\\\’t \\\”the way things were\\\”?
    8: She doens\\\’t even put herself in with the authers
    9: I\\\’m with you on that one. I think that loving a story is great, but you should also still live your life.
    10: Hahaha, well yes, but that happens in most stories.
    11: He has many flaws, only Bella is so blinded by her love that she can\\\’t see them. He knows how flawed he is.
    12: Bella is supposed to be a plain character, but I still disagree.
    13: Hahaha….because all the Forks highschool boys are hormonal and will take anything new.
    14: You could say the same thing about Juliet.
    15: Some parents are like that, but that is true that it\\\’s awfully convienient. Then again, that\\\’s probably why it\\\’s fiction.
    16: It\\\’s true, I do wish that she had developed the characters more.
    17: Bella\\\’s just really bad at everything, like with being clummsy and all that. She can\\\’t help that.
    18: Everyone has they\\\’re personal oppinions.
    19: It does sound creepy, and in Midnight Sun (Edward\\\’s story) he is thinking the same thing. But if they had been dating at the time, it wouldn\\\’t have been creepy to people.
    20: It can be cheesy at times. Of course! Almost all stories have they\\\’re moments.
    21: Stephenie Meyer has her own way of writting.
    22: What? You\\\’re not allowed to like both? Well better kill me than.
    23: Bella is very obsorbed in her love interest.
    24: There are flaws in everything.
    25: Jacob: \\\’You don\\\’t worry about the fangs?\\\” Bella: \\\”Shut up Jacob! You know he doesn\\\’t have fangs!\\\”–Eclipse, page 218.
    26: I think it\\\’s cool that she has her own version of vampires. If people never went against the grain, vampires wouldn\\\’t have even been written about.
    27: \\\’\\\”Bella,\\\” my mom said to me as I got on the plain.\\\’ Twilight, page 4.
    28: I like face touching. :(
    29: So are most every story. It\\\’s called forshadowing.
    Real 30: Haha. Well I hope you en joyed it. lol
    31: What should she have named them? Begarth, and Nalton? Maybe she just liked those names.
    32: I agree with that, it doesn\\\’t make sense that he can\\\’t sweat, he can\\\’t cry, but he can impregnant.
    33: That\\\’s your opinon and you are allowed to voice it.
    34: Some poeple also believe that Robert Pattinson is in love with them. That doesn\\\’t effect the story at all.
    35: Sometimes.
    36: Well, all stories have something in common with others.
    37: You have a better idea? What\\\’s so bad about that?
    38: You can make fun of anything. Jesus is really easy to make fun of too. lol
    39: The book wasn\\\’t made for ten year olds.
    40: It\\\’s hard to fit everything in. And the story wasn\\\’t about them.
    41: Other people\\\’s actions shouldn\\\’t make one bit of differance in what YOU like or don\\\’t.
    42: Fangirls go overboard a lot. Still, what differance does it make to YOU liking or disliking something?
    43: Stephen King is not god. Who cans what he thinks? look at answer above.
    44: Good reason.
    43: Okay then. lol
    44: That makes no sense.
    45: Meyer never even thought of herself as a writer, she just wrote a book and people loved it. A LOT.
    46: You\\\’ve repeated this reason many times.
    47: Oh no!
    48: Hahahaha! Well that\\\’s a good reason. Funny one though.
    49: I know many actually.
    50: Most books/movies do that.
    51: Actually teenagers fall in love the most quickly. But I think you\\\’re right about it all happening so fast. But that\\\’s kind of the plot. Maddly in love and all that.
    52: Hahahaha! You\\\’re funny. :D
    53: Haha. That\\\’s not what she Meyer was saying at all.
    54: I know what you mean. I really wish that some of these fan girls would just give it a rest. Even worse then that though is the fact that a lot of them think that Robert Pattinson (Edward Cullen) is actually the character he plays. Hense him being attacked by screaming fangirls (aka stalkers) dayly.
    55: Actually she\\\’d been there for two.
    http://stepheniemeyer.com/pdf/midnightsun_partial_draft4.pdf
    Page 106-110.
    56: If you read Twilight, Bella notices that Rosalie and Emmett look too old to be in highschool, and he didn\\\’t change Alice or Jasper, Esme\\\’s not a teen, so only Edward.
    57-61: I agree with that very much. It\\\’s no wonder you hate it when these are the only kinds of Twilight fans you\\\’ve spoken too. I don\\\’t think that it is right at all to threaten someone\\\’s life just for voicing they\\\’re oppinions. I don\\\’t hate you, and I don\\\’t disrespect you simply because you don\\\’t like Twilght. Infact, I would love to hear you\\\’re response to this, so e-mail me at brinna_drew@yahoo.com please.
    62: haha. Interesting theory.
    63: o.O ? lol
    64: If I were him I\\\’d do the same thing. Hahaha.
    65: Hahahaha. I really do think that Stephenie Meyer is a good person, no matter how much you hate her books/fans.
    66: Vampire vs Werewolf is a classic.
    67: I agree. There\\\’s nothing wrong with reading, loving and even obsessing a little over fictional things. But when it interfears with your life, it\\\’s a problem.
    68: I disagree, but again, your oppinion is yours to voice.
    69: Well, thats the whole point of the story, she\\\’s so in love that she doesn\\\’t even care about herself anymore.
    70: Some people are so insane…..:(
    71: That may be true. I just hate it when someone likes Twilight because it\\\’s so popular, or hates it because of the fans behind it.
    72: Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! rotl
    73: *sigh* that\\\’s the point when you need to look at your life and say \\\”what the hell happened?!\\\”
    74: Hahaha. He doesn\\\’t age. So he\\\’s actually younger than him. She\\\’s the pedophile. hahaha.
    75: Again, you kind of repeat yourself in this thing. :)
    76: I always hated Jacob for that. :(
    77: That is so lame. haha.
    78: Hahahaha. I doubt it.
    79: Repeat again.
    80: Love is a funny thing.
    81: He made her kiss him, abandened her because she loved vampires, and fell for her infent child. He\\\’s not perfect either.
    82: sigh.
    83: Hahaha.
    84: Thats no reason not to read them.
    85: Again, I agree.
    86: Other peoples oppinions don\\\’t change mine.
    87: Nice.
    88: Good reasons.
    89: WTF? He wouldn\\\’t approve of a lot of things.
    90: Personal opinion.
    91: Look above.
    92: lol
    Okay, that\\\’s my arrgument. lol
    E-mail me please and tell me your opinion.
    I think you sound nice and I\\\’m not going to hate you just because you hate something I like a lot.

  767. Brinna
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 7:45 am

    Okay, at least read this all the way through, ok?
    Reasons 1/2: Bella being clumsy doesn’t really matter.
    3: I agree that she’s pretty useless sometimes.
    4: She did not attempt to commit suicide, she was cliff diving for a thrill.
    5: Meyer is a mother of three, and it’s fine to hate her books, but you don’t have to hate her as a person.
    6: She openly admits that she’s not a writer, she had a dream, started writting and it became a book, and she is very modest about it.
    7: What if the first person who thought about writing vampires didn’t do it because it wasn’t “the way things were”?
    8: She doens’t even put herself in with the authers
    9: I’m with you on that one. I think that loving a story is great, but you should also still live your life.
    10: Hahaha, well yes, but that happens in most stories.
    11: He has many flaws, only Bella is so blinded by her love that she can’t see them. He knows how flawed he is.
    12: Bella is supposed to be a plain character, but I still disagree.
    13: Hahaha….because all the Forks highschool boys are hormonal and will take anything new.
    14: You could say the same thing about Juliet.
    15: Some parents are like that, but that is true that it’s awfully convienient. Then again, that’s probably why it’s fiction.
    16: It’s true, I do wish that she had developed the characters more.
    17: Bella’s just really bad at everything, like with being clummsy and all that. She can’t help that.
    18: Everyone has they’re personal oppinions.
    19: It does sound creepy, and in Midnight Sun (Edward’s story) he is thinking the same thing. But if they had been dating at the time, it wouldn’t have been creepy to people.
    20: It can be cheesy at times. Of course! Almost all stories have they’re moments.
    21: Stephenie Meyer has her own way of writting.
    22: What? You’re not allowed to like both? Well better kill me than.
    23: Bella is very obsorbed in her love interest.
    24: There are flaws in everything.
    25: Jacob: ‘You don’t worry about the fangs?” Bella: “Shut up Jacob! You know he doesn’t have fangs!”–Eclipse, page 218.
    26: I think it’s cool that she has her own version of vampires. If people never went against the grain, vampires wouldn’t have even been written about.
    27: ‘”Bella,” my mom said to me as I got on the plain.’ Twilight, page 4.
    28: I like face touching. :(
    29: So are most every story. It’s called forshadowing.
    Real 30: Haha. Well I hope you en joyed it. lol
    31: What should she have named them? Begarth, and Nalton? Maybe she just liked those names.
    32: I agree with that, it doesn’t make sense that he can’t sweat, he can’t cry, but he can impregnant.
    33: That’s your opinon and you are allowed to voice it.
    34: Some poeple also believe that Robert Pattinson is in love with them. That doesn’t effect the story at all.
    35: Sometimes.
    36: Well, all stories have something in common with others.
    37: You have a better idea? What’s so bad about that?
    38: You can make fun of anything. Jesus is really easy to make fun of too. lol
    39: The book wasn’t made for ten year olds.
    40: It’s hard to fit everything in. And the story wasn’t about them.
    41: Other people’s actions shouldn’t make one bit of differance in what YOU like or don’t.
    42: Fangirls go overboard a lot. Still, what differance does it make to YOU liking or disliking something?
    43: Stephen King is not god. Who cans what he thinks? look at answer above.
    44: Good reason.
    43: Okay then. lol
    44: That makes no sense.
    45: Meyer never even thought of herself as a writer, she just wrote a book and people loved it. A LOT.
    46: You’ve repeated this reason many times.
    47: Oh no!
    48: Hahahaha! Well that’s a good reason. Funny one though.
    49: I know many actually.
    50: Most books/movies do that.
    51: Actually teenagers fall in love the most quickly. But I think you’re right about it all happening so fast. But that’s kind of the plot. Maddly in love and all that.
    52: Hahahaha! You’re funny. :D
    53: Haha. That’s not what she Meyer was saying at all.
    54: I know what you mean. I really wish that some of these fan girls would just give it a rest. Even worse then that though is the fact that a lot of them think that Robert Pattinson (Edward Cullen) is actually the character he plays. Hense him being attacked by screaming fangirls (aka stalkers) dayly.
    55: Actually she’d been there for two.
    http://stepheniemeyer.com/pdf/midnightsun_partial_draft4.pdf
    Page 106-110.
    56: If you read Twilight, Bella notices that Rosalie and Emmett look too old to be in highschool, and he didn’t change Alice or Jasper, Esme’s not a teen, so only Edward.
    57-61: I agree with that very much. It’s no wonder you hate it when these are the only kinds of Twilight fans you’ve spoken too. I don’t think that it is right at all to threaten someone’s life just for voicing they’re oppinions. I don’t hate you, and I don’t disrespect you simply because you don’t like Twilght. Infact, I would love to hear you’re response to this, so e-mail me at brinna_drew@yahoo.com please.
    62: haha. Interesting theory.
    63: o.O ? lol
    64: If I were him I’d do the same thing. Hahaha.
    65: Hahahaha. I really do think that Stephenie Meyer is a good person, no matter how much you hate her books/fans.
    66: Vampire vs Werewolf is a classic.
    67: I agree. There’s nothing wrong with reading, loving and even obsessing a little over fictional things. But when it interfears with your life, it’s a problem.
    68: I disagree, but again, your oppinion is yours to voice.
    69: Well, thats the whole point of the story, she’s so in love that she doesn’t even care about herself anymore.
    70: Some people are so insane…..:(
    71: That may be true. I just hate it when someone likes Twilight because it’s so popular, or hates it because of the fans behind it.
    72: Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! rotl
    73: *sigh* that’s the point when you need to look at your life and say “what the hell happened?!”
    74: Hahaha. He doesn’t age. So he’s actually younger than him. She’s the pedophile. hahaha.
    75: Again, you kind of repeat yourself in this thing. :)
    76: I always hated Jacob for that. :(
    77: That is so lame. haha.
    78: Hahahaha. I doubt it.
    79: Repeat again.
    80: Love is a funny thing.
    81: He made her kiss him, abandened her because she loved vampires, and fell for her infent child. He’s not perfect either.
    82: sigh.
    83: Hahaha.
    84: Thats no reason not to read them.
    85: Again, I agree.
    86: Other peoples oppinions don’t change mine.
    87: Nice.
    88: Good reasons.
    89: WTF? He wouldn’t approve of a lot of things.
    90: Personal opinion.
    91: Look above.
    92: lol
    Okay, that’s my arrgument. lol
    E-mail me please and tell me your opinion.
    I think you sound nice and I’m not going to hate you just because you hate something I like a lot.

  768. Brinna
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 7:58 am

    Okay, at least read this all the way through, ok?
    Reasons 1/2: Bella being clumsy doesn\\\\\\\’t really matter.
    3: I agree that she\\\\\\\’s pretty useless sometimes.
    4: She did not attempt to commit suicide, she was cliff diving for a thrill.
    5: Meyer is a mother of three, and it\\\\\\\’s fine to hate her books, but you don\\\\\\\’t have to hate her as a person.
    6: She openly admits that she\\\\\\\’s not a writer, she had a dream, started writting and it became a book, and she is very modest about it.
    7: What if the first person who thought about writing vampires didn\\\\\\\’t do it because it wasn\\\\\\\’t \\\\\\\”the way things were\\\\\\\”?
    8: She doens\\\\\\\’t even put herself in with the authers
    9: I\\\\\\\’m with you on that one. I think that loving a story is great, but you should also still live your life.
    10: Hahaha, well yes, but that happens in most stories.
    11: He has many flaws, only Bella is so blinded by her love that she can\\\\\\\’t see them. He knows how flawed he is.
    12: Bella is supposed to be a plain character, but I still disagree.
    13: Hahaha….because all the Forks highschool boys are hormonal and will take anything new.
    14: You could say the same thing about Juliet.
    15: Some parents are like that, but that is true that it\\\\\\\’s awfully convienient. Then again, that\\\\\\\’s probably why it\\\\\\\’s fiction.
    16: It\\\\\\\’s true, I do wish that she had developed the characters more.
    17: Bella\\\\\\\’s just really bad at everything, like with being clummsy and all that. She can\\\\\\\’t help that.
    18: Everyone has they\\\\\\\’re personal oppinions.
    19: It does sound creepy, and in Midnight Sun (Edward\\\\\\\’s story) he is thinking the same thing. But if they had been dating at the time, it wouldn\\\\\\\’t have been creepy to people.
    20: It can be cheesy at times. Of course! Almost all stories have they\\\\\\\’re moments.
    21: Stephenie Meyer has her own way of writting.
    22: What? You\\\\\\\’re not allowed to like both? Well better kill me than.
    23: Bella is very obsorbed in her love interest.
    24: There are flaws in everything.
    25: Jacob: \\\\\\\’You don\\\\\\\’t worry about the fangs?\\\\\\\” Bella: \\\\\\\”Shut up Jacob! You know he doesn\\\\\\\’t have fangs!\\\\\\\”–Eclipse, page 218.
    26: I think it\\\\\\\’s cool that she has her own version of vampires. If people never went against the grain, vampires wouldn\\\\\\\’t have even been written about.
    27: \\\\\\\’\\\\\\\”Bella,\\\\\\\” my mom said to me as I got on the plain.\\\\\\\’ Twilight, page 4.
    28: I like face touching. :(
    29: So are most every story. It\\\\\\\’s called forshadowing.
    Real 30: Haha. Well I hope you en joyed it. lol
    31: What should she have named them? Begarth, and Nalton? Maybe she just liked those names.
    32: I agree with that, it doesn\\\\\\\’t make sense that he can\\\\\\\’t sweat, he can\\\\\\\’t cry, but he can impregnant.
    33: That\\\\\\\’s your opinon and you are allowed to voice it.
    34: Some poeple also believe that Robert Pattinson is in love with them. That doesn\\\\\\\’t effect the story at all.
    35: Sometimes.
    36: Well, all stories have something in common with others.
    37: You have a better idea? What\\\\\\\’s so bad about that?
    38: You can make fun of anything. Jesus is really easy to make fun of too. lol
    39: The book wasn\\\\\\\’t made for ten year olds.
    40: It\\\\\\\’s hard to fit everything in. And the story wasn\\\\\\\’t about them.
    41: Other people\\\\\\\’s actions shouldn\\\\\\\’t make one bit of differance in what YOU like or don\\\\\\\’t.
    42: Fangirls go overboard a lot. Still, what differance does it make to YOU liking or disliking something?
    43: Stephen King is not god. Who cans what he thinks? look at answer above.
    44: Good reason.
    43: Okay then. lol
    44: That makes no sense.
    45: Meyer never even thought of herself as a writer, she just wrote a book and people loved it. A LOT.
    46: You\\\\\\\’ve repeated this reason many times.
    47: Oh no!
    48: Hahahaha! Well that\\\\\\\’s a good reason. Funny one though.
    49: I know many actually.
    50: Most books/movies do that.
    51: Actually teenagers fall in love the most quickly. But I think you\\\\\\\’re right about it all happening so fast. But that\\\\\\\’s kind of the plot. Maddly in love and all that.
    52: Hahahaha! You\\\\\\\’re funny. :D
    53: Haha. That\\\\\\\’s not what she Meyer was saying at all.
    54: I know what you mean. I really wish that some of these fan girls would just give it a rest. Even worse then that though is the fact that a lot of them think that Robert Pattinson (Edward Cullen) is actually the character he plays. Hense him being attacked by screaming fangirls (aka stalkers) dayly.
    55: Actually she\\\\\\\’d been there for two.
    http://stepheniemeyer.com/pdf/midnightsun_partial_draft4.pdf
    Page 106-110.
    56: If you read Twilight, Bella notices that Rosalie and Emmett look too old to be in highschool, and he didn\\\\\\\’t change Alice or Jasper, Esme\\\\\\\’s not a teen, so only Edward.
    57-61: I agree with that very much. It\\\\\\\’s no wonder you hate it when these are the only kinds of Twilight fans you\\\\\\\’ve spoken too. I don\\\\\\\’t think that it is right at all to threaten someone\\\\\\\’s life just for voicing they\\\\\\\’re oppinions. I don\\\\\\\’t hate you, and I don\\\\\\\’t disrespect you simply because you don\\\\\\\’t like Twilght. Infact, I would love to hear you\\\\\\\’re response to this, so e-mail me at brinna_drew@yahoo.com please.
    62: haha. Interesting theory.
    63: o.O ? lol
    64: If I were him I\\\\\\\’d do the same thing. Hahaha.
    65: Hahahaha. I really do think that Stephenie Meyer is a good person, no matter how much you hate her books/fans.
    66: Vampire vs Werewolf is a classic.
    67: I agree. There\\\\\\\’s nothing wrong with reading, loving and even obsessing a little over fictional things. But when it interfears with your life, it\\\\\\\’s a problem.
    68: I disagree, but again, your oppinion is yours to voice.
    69: Well, thats the whole point of the story, she\\\\\\\’s so in love that she doesn\\\\\\\’t even care about herself anymore.
    70: Some people are so insane…..:(
    71: That may be true. I just hate it when someone likes Twilight because it\\\\\\\’s so popular, or hates it because of the fans behind it.
    72: Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! rotl
    73: *sigh* that\\\\\\\’s the point when you need to look at your life and say \\\\\\\”what the hell happened?!\\\\\\\”
    74: Hahaha. He doesn\\\\\\\’t age. So he\\\\\\\’s actually younger than him. She\\\\\\\’s the pedophile. hahaha.
    75: Again, you kind of repeat yourself in this thing. :)
    76: I always hated Jacob for that. :(
    77: That is so lame. haha.
    78: Hahahaha. I doubt it.
    79: Repeat again.
    80: Love is a funny thing.
    81: He made her kiss him, abandened her because she loved vampires, and fell for her infent child. He\\\\\\\’s not perfect either.
    82: sigh.
    83: Hahaha.
    84: Thats no reason not to read them.
    85: Again, I agree.
    86: Other peoples oppinions don\\\\\\\’t change mine.
    87: Nice.
    88: Good reasons.
    89: WTF? He wouldn\\\\\\\’t approve of a lot of things.
    90: Personal opinion.
    91: Look above.
    92: lol
    Okay, that\\\\\\\’s my arrgument. lol
    E-mail me please and tell me your opinion.
    I think you sound nice and I\\\\\\\’m not going to hate you just because you hate something I like a lot.

  769. Brinna
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 8:10 am

    Okay, at least read this all the way through, ok?
    Reasons 1/2: Bella being clumsy doesn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t really matter.
    3: I agree that she\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s pretty useless sometimes.
    4: She did not attempt to commit suicide, she was cliff diving for a thrill.
    5: Meyer is a mother of three, and it\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s fine to hate her books, but you don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t have to hate her as a person.
    6: She openly admits that she\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s not a writer, she had a dream, started writting and it became a book, and she is very modest about it.
    7: What if the first person who thought about writing vampires didn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t do it because it wasn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\”the way things were\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\”?
    8: She doens\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t even put herself in with the authers
    9: I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’m with you on that one. I think that loving a story is great, but you should also still live your life.
    10: Hahaha, well yes, but that happens in most stories.
    11: He has many flaws, only Bella is so blinded by her love that she can\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t see them. He knows how flawed he is.
    12: Bella is supposed to be a plain character, but I still disagree.
    13: Hahaha….because all the Forks highschool boys are hormonal and will take anything new.
    14: You could say the same thing about Juliet.
    15: Some parents are like that, but that is true that it\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s awfully convienient. Then again, that\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s probably why it\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s fiction.
    16: It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s true, I do wish that she had developed the characters more.
    17: Bella\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s just really bad at everything, like with being clummsy and all that. She can\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t help that.
    18: Everyone has they\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’re personal oppinions.
    19: It does sound creepy, and in Midnight Sun (Edward\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s story) he is thinking the same thing. But if they had been dating at the time, it wouldn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t have been creepy to people.
    20: It can be cheesy at times. Of course! Almost all stories have they\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’re moments.
    21: Stephenie Meyer has her own way of writting.
    22: What? You\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’re not allowed to like both? Well better kill me than.
    23: Bella is very obsorbed in her love interest.
    24: There are flaws in everything.
    25: Jacob: \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’You don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t worry about the fangs?\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\” Bella: \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\”Shut up Jacob! You know he doesn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t have fangs!\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\”–Eclipse, page 218.
    26: I think it\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s cool that she has her own version of vampires. If people never went against the grain, vampires wouldn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t have even been written about.
    27: \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\”Bella,\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\” my mom said to me as I got on the plain.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’ Twilight, page 4.
    28: I like face touching. :(
    29: So are most every story. It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s called forshadowing.
    Real 30: Haha. Well I hope you en joyed it. lol
    31: What should she have named them? Begarth, and Nalton? Maybe she just liked those names.
    32: I agree with that, it doesn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t make sense that he can\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t sweat, he can\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t cry, but he can impregnant.
    33: That\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s your opinon and you are allowed to voice it.
    34: Some poeple also believe that Robert Pattinson is in love with them. That doesn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t effect the story at all.
    35: Sometimes.
    36: Well, all stories have something in common with others.
    37: You have a better idea? What\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s so bad about that?
    38: You can make fun of anything. Jesus is really easy to make fun of too. lol
    39: The book wasn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t made for ten year olds.
    40: It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s hard to fit everything in. And the story wasn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t about them.
    41: Other people\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s actions shouldn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t make one bit of differance in what YOU like or don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t.
    42: Fangirls go overboard a lot. Still, what differance does it make to YOU liking or disliking something?
    43: Stephen King is not god. Who cans what he thinks? look at answer above.
    44: Good reason.
    43: Okay then. lol
    44: That makes no sense.
    45: Meyer never even thought of herself as a writer, she just wrote a book and people loved it. A LOT.
    46: You\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’ve repeated this reason many times.
    47: Oh no!
    48: Hahahaha! Well that\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s a good reason. Funny one though.
    49: I know many actually.
    50: Most books/movies do that.
    51: Actually teenagers fall in love the most quickly. But I think you\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’re right about it all happening so fast. But that\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s kind of the plot. Maddly in love and all that.
    52: Hahahaha! You\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’re funny. :D
    53: Haha. That\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s not what she Meyer was saying at all.
    54: I know what you mean. I really wish that some of these fan girls would just give it a rest. Even worse then that though is the fact that a lot of them think that Robert Pattinson (Edward Cullen) is actually the character he plays. Hense him being attacked by screaming fangirls (aka stalkers) dayly.
    55: Actually she\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’d been there for two.
    http://stepheniemeyer.com/pdf/midnightsun_partial_draft4.pdf
    Page 106-110.
    56: If you read Twilight, Bella notices that Rosalie and Emmett look too old to be in highschool, and he didn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t change Alice or Jasper, Esme\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s not a teen, so only Edward.
    57-61: I agree with that very much. It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s no wonder you hate it when these are the only kinds of Twilight fans you\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’ve spoken too. I don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t think that it is right at all to threaten someone\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s life just for voicing they\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’re oppinions. I don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t hate you, and I don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t disrespect you simply because you don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t like Twilght. Infact, I would love to hear you\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’re response to this, so e-mail me at brinna_drew@yahoo.com please.
    62: haha. Interesting theory.
    63: o.O ? lol
    64: If I were him I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’d do the same thing. Hahaha.
    65: Hahahaha. I really do think that Stephenie Meyer is a good person, no matter how much you hate her books/fans.
    66: Vampire vs Werewolf is a classic.
    67: I agree. There\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s nothing wrong with reading, loving and even obsessing a little over fictional things. But when it interfears with your life, it\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s a problem.
    68: I disagree, but again, your oppinion is yours to voice.
    69: Well, thats the whole point of the story, she\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s so in love that she doesn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t even care about herself anymore.
    70: Some people are so insane…..:(
    71: That may be true. I just hate it when someone likes Twilight because it\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s so popular, or hates it because of the fans behind it.
    72: Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! rotl
    73: *sigh* that\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s the point when you need to look at your life and say \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\”what the hell happened?!\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\”
    74: Hahaha. He doesn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t age. So he\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s actually younger than him. She\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s the pedophile. hahaha.
    75: Again, you kind of repeat yourself in this thing. :)
    76: I always hated Jacob for that. :(
    77: That is so lame. haha.
    78: Hahahaha. I doubt it.
    79: Repeat again.
    80: Love is a funny thing.
    81: He made her kiss him, abandened her because she loved vampires, and fell for her infent child. He\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s not perfect either.
    82: sigh.
    83: Hahaha.
    84: Thats no reason not to read them.
    85: Again, I agree.
    86: Other peoples oppinions don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t change mine.
    87: Nice.
    88: Good reasons.
    89: WTF? He wouldn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’t approve of a lot of things.
    90: Personal opinion.
    91: Look above.
    92: lol
    Okay, that\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s my arrgument. lol
    E-mail me please and tell me your opinion.
    I think you sound nice and I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’m not going to hate you just because you hate something I like a lot.

  770. Cassie
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 8:25 am

    I totally agree with all of these and they had me totally in stitches.
    But the thing that bugs me most is that Meyers says that the books were based on/inspired by some of the greatest literature ever written; Twilight- Pride and Prejudice, New Moon- Romeo and Juliet, Eclipse- Whuthering Heights and Breaking Dawn- A Midsummer Night’s Dream. I’m not a big fan of these (except maybe P&P- happy endings aren’t all bad.) but at least they were well written. And the idea that there are any types of comparisons being made between them truly gets under my skin.

  771. Posted June 23, 2009 at 9:31 am

    Dont be hatin or jealous cause the only fame you will come by is making fun of something that millions of people love. Have a good day.

  772. Sinai
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    Hi. Well I can see that you completely aired your views upon The Twilight Series, and have received a numerous amount of negative responses, along with a couple who feel exactly the way you do.

    I would like to explain the reason why most teenage girls, as myself, or even older women have for expressing and defending to such extremes goddess Stephenie Meyer and the whole Saga. I believe it is the whole issue of sexual tension that exists between Bella and Edward, which you don’t get alot nowadays where raging hormonal teenagers just have a couple of sips of some cheap beer and start undressing themselves while playing spin the bottle. Also, the loss of the art of romanticism, ofcourse most of the phrases in the series are extremely corny and sometimes cliche and also appear very “suicidal”, but which author has the guts to publish a book with such literary errors and views that are not present any longer in this nation?, and what person would not like to have an “unconditional” love who suffers while being at your side ?(either for exquisite and tasty smell or because you are incredibly gorgeous and I can’t makeout with you), or have someone who is even the least willing to express suicidal thought, without the fear of being considered a perfect candidate of the psychiatrist, because they aren’t able to live by your side?

    Its not the perfect panorama that should be attained as a model for teenage girls, but it just shows how much lack of love a lot of people around the globe have and grasping it with a vampire/human novel, makes everyone daydream.

    Which is exactly why I am pro-twilight. Because maybe now teenagers will have an inner conflict in deciding whether or not they really do love a person instead of just going around dancing in circles saying, i love john, and later seeing the guy hooking up with a chick in the corner, and later running in circles saying i love mark. I know that a lot of people especially men, criticize the character edward because they believe that now women will unfallibly wait for a vampire love until the grow old, but I believe that edward is a good fictional character, not because he is “gorgeous” but because he raises the average standards for men especially the “today” man who has lost a lot of respect for women and lets just say anyone. ( i see it all the time, i live in the city and trust me when I say loss of respect. )

    As for Isabella Swan, Yes. She is clumsy. Yes. She is sometimes drowned in “edward” thoughts, but it is only because she is in love with him. Maybe it might have started with the fact that he is almost godlike but throughout the series her personality evolves and she does recognize his flaws (she mentions how he is always blaming himself for the damage that she causes upon herself and how he is extremely overprotective of her )and she does go beyond the means to break some of his rules.(hello. she went to la push while he was away, and also went to save her mom even though he told her DONT GO BELLA.) She is strength in character because she is stubborn, but she also shows her dominant side(hello. she convinced edward to have sexual intercouse with her even though he had said no.), and yet she can be completely fragile and defensless. Which in total equals perfect balance between both characters because they have a mutualistic relationship that evens out each others flaws.

    But since I am trying severely hard to sound diplomatic, i will end this with saying one thing, well several:

    I think that you are a person who is uncapable of reading such in depth literature because you are too consumed reading each line as if you were a grammar teacher. Ayyeeeee mate, I would love to see some of your emotional writing, I would like to see if you use original character names like bam bam noodle butt or dishwasher. Yeaaa, i know you love those because they are o-rigi-nal, not like edward or bella. Yeaaa you like that huh?huh? punk. Also, please define author, because I did not know that writing a novel had “rules” or even writing at all, in that case they should ban those damn haikus because they really do not say ish. The book is about love, not about the “Adventures of Alice: Seeing the future” or “A guide to controlling people emotions:Jasper”. I think the only part in your reasons for hating twilight which where purposely trying to be funny, and that actually made me laugh was the Chuch Norris one. So kudos on that one. Yeaaa I am a die hard Twilight fan, and by the way if it werent called the Twilight Series, then should it be called “The phases of the day series, or maybe the phases of the moon series.” Ayyeee mate. Youre just stating the obvious, which doesn’t make it a good reason for hating twilight.”

    Peace out.

  773. Sinai
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    Hi. Well I can see that you completely aired your views upon The Twilight Series, and have received a numerous amount of negative responses, along with a couple who feel exactly the way you do.

    I would like to explain the reason why most teenage girls, as myself, or even older women have for expressing and defending to such extremes goddess Stephenie Meyer and the whole Saga. I believe it is the whole issue of sexual tension that exists between Bella and Edward, which you don\’t get alot nowadays where raging hormonal teenagers just have a couple of sips of some cheap beer and start undressing themselves while playing spin the bottle. Also, the loss of the art of romanticism, ofcourse most of the phrases in the series are extremely corny and sometimes cliche and also appear very \”suicidal\”, but which author has the guts to publish a book with such literary errors and views that are not present any longer in this nation?, and what person would not like to have an \”unconditional\” love who suffers while being at your side ?(either for exquisite and tasty smell or because you are incredibly gorgeous and I can\’t makeout with you), or have someone who is even the least willing to express suicidal thought, without the fear of being considered a perfect candidate of the psychiatrist, because they aren\’t able to live by your side?

    Its not the perfect panorama that should be attained as a model for teenage girls, but it just shows how much lack of love a lot of people around the globe have and grasping it with a vampire/human novel, makes everyone daydream.

    Which is exactly why I am pro-twilight. Because maybe now teenagers will have an inner conflict in deciding whether or not they really do love a person instead of just going around dancing in circles saying, i love john, and later seeing the guy hooking up with a chick in the corner, and later running in circles saying i love mark. I know that a lot of people especially men, criticize the character edward because they believe that now women will unfallibly wait for a vampire love until the grow old, but I believe that edward is a good fictional character, not because he is \”gorgeous\” but because he raises the average standards for men especially the \”today\” man who has lost a lot of respect for women and lets just say anyone. ( i see it all the time, i live in the city and trust me when I say loss of respect. )

    As for Isabella Swan, Yes. She is clumsy. Yes. She is sometimes drowned in \”edward\” thoughts, but it is only because she is in love with him. Maybe it might have started with the fact that he is almost godlike but throughout the series her personality evolves and she does recognize his flaws (she mentions how he is always blaming himself for the damage that she causes upon herself and how he is extremely overprotective of her )and she does go beyond the means to break some of his rules.(hello. she went to la push while he was away, and also went to save her mom even though he told her DONT GO BELLA.) She is strength in character because she is stubborn, but she also shows her dominant side(hello. she convinced edward to have sexual intercouse with her even though he had said no.), and yet she can be completely fragile and defensless. Which in total equals perfect balance between both characters because they have a mutualistic relationship that evens out each others flaws.

    But since I am trying severely hard to sound diplomatic, i will end this with saying one thing, well several:

    I think that you are a person who is uncapable of reading such in depth literature because you are too consumed reading each line as if you were a grammar teacher. Ayyeeeee mate, I would love to see some of your emotional writing, I would like to see if you use original character names like bam bam noodle butt or dishwasher. Yeaaa, i know you love those because they are o-rigi-nal, not like edward or bella. Yeaaa you like that huh?huh? punk. Also, please define author, because I did not know that writing a novel had \”rules\” or even writing at all, in that case they should ban those damn haikus because they really do not say ish. The book is about love, not about the \”Adventures of Alice: Seeing the future\” or \”A guide to controlling people emotions:Jasper\”. I think the only part in your reasons for hating twilight which where purposely trying to be funny, and that actually made me laugh was the Chuch Norris one. So kudos on that one. Yeaaa I am a die hard Twilight fan, and by the way if it werent called the Twilight Series, then should it be called \”The phases of the day series, or maybe the phases of the moon series.\” Ayyeee mate. Youre just stating the obvious, which doesn\’t make it a good reason for hating twilight.\”

    Peace out.

  774. Sinai
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    Hi. Well I can see that you completely aired your views upon The Twilight Series, and have received a numerous amount of negative responses, along with a couple who feel exactly the way you do.

    I would like to explain the reason why most teenage girls, as myself, or even older women have for expressing and defending to such extremes goddess Stephenie Meyer and the whole Saga. I believe it is the whole issue of sexual tension that exists between Bella and Edward, which you dont get alot nowadays where raging hormonal teenagers just have a couple of sips of some cheap beer and start undressing themselves while playing spin the bottle. Also, the loss of the art of romanticism, ofcourse most of the phrases in the series are extremely corny and sometimes cliche and also appear very (suicidal), but which author has the guts to publish a book with such literary errors and views that are not present any longer in this nation?, and what person would not like to have an unconditional love who suffers while being at your side ?(either for exquisite and tasty smell or because you are incredibly gorgeous and I cant makeout with you), or have someone who is even the least willing to express suicidal thought, without the fear of being considered a perfect candidate of the psychiatrist, because they arent able to live by your side?

    Its not the perfect panorama that should be attained as a model for teenage girls, but it just shows how much lack of love a lot of people around the globe have and grasping it with a vampire/human novel, makes everyone daydream.

    Which is exactly why I am pro-twilight. Because maybe now teenagers will have an inner conflict in deciding whether or not they really do love a person instead of just going around dancing in circles saying, i love john, and later seeing the guy hooking up with a chick in the corner, and later running in circles saying i love mark. I know that a lot of people especially men, criticize the character edward because they believe that now women will unfallibly wait for a vampire love until the grow old, but I believe that edward is a good fictional character, not because he is (gorgeous) but because he raises the average standards for men especially the (today)man who has lost a lot of respect for women and lets just say anyone. ( i see it all the time, i live in the city and trust me when I say loss of respect. )

    As for Isabella Swan, Yes. She is clumsy. Yes. She is sometimes drowned in (edward)thoughts, but it is only because she is in love with him. Maybe it might have started with the fact that he is almost godlike but throughout the series her personality evolves and she does recognize his flaws (she mentions how he is always blaming himself for the damage that she causes upon herself and how he is extremely overprotective of her )and she does go beyond the means to break some of his rules.(hello. she went to la push while he was away, and also went to save her mom even though he told her DONT GO BELLA.) She is strength in character because she is stubborn, but she also shows her dominant side(hello. she convinced edward to have sexual intercouse with her even though he had said no.), and yet she can be completely fragile and defensless. Which in total equals perfect balance between both characters because they have a mutualistic relationship that evens out each others flaws.

    But since I am trying severely hard to sound diplomatic, i will end this with saying one thing, well several:

    I think that you are a person who is uncapable of reading such in depth literature because you are too consumed reading each line as if you were a grammar teacher. Ayyeeeee mate, I would love to see some of your emotional writing, I would like to see if you use original character names like bam bam noodle butt or dishwasher. Yeaaa, i know you love those because they are o-rigi-nal, not like edward or bella. Yeaaa you like that huh?huh? punk. Also, please define author, because I did not know that writing a novel had (rules)or even writing at all, in that case they should ban those damn haikus because they really do not say ish. The book is about love, not about the (Adventures of Alice: Seeing the future) or \(A guide to controlling people emotions:Jasper) I think the only part in your reasons for hating twilight which where purposely trying to be funny, and that actually made me laugh was the Chuch Norris one. So kudos on that one. Yeaaa I am a die hard Twilight fan, and by the way if it werent called the Twilight Series, then should it be called (The phases of the day series, or maybe the phases of the moon series.( Ayyeee mate. Youre just stating the obvious, which doesntmake it a good reason for hating twilight.)

    Peace out.

  775. Sinai
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    Hi. Well I can see that you completely aired your views upon The Twilight Series, and have received a numerous amount of negative responses, along with a couple who feel exactly the way you do.

    I would like to explain the reason why most teenage girls, as myself, or even older women have for expressing and defending to such extremes goddess Stephenie Meyer and the whole Saga. I believe it is the whole issue of sexual tension that exists between Bella and Edward, which you dont get alot nowadays where raging hormonal teenagers just have a couple of sips of some cheap beer and start undressing themselves while playing spin the bottle. Also, the loss of the art of romanticism, ofcourse most of the phrases in the series are extremely corny and sometimes cliche and also appear very (suicidal), but which author has the guts to publish a book with such literary errors and views that are not present any longer in this nation?, and what person would not like to have an unconditional love who suffers while being at your side ?(either for exquisite and tasty smell or because you are incredibly gorgeous and I cant makeout with you), or have someone who is even the least willing to express suicidal thought, without the fear of being considered a perfect candidate of the psychiatrist, because they arent able to live by your side?

    Its not the perfect panorama that should be attained as a model for teenage girls, but it just shows how much lack of love a lot of people around the globe have and grasping it with a vampire/human novel, makes everyone daydream.

    Which is exactly why I am pro-twilight. Because maybe now teenagers will have an inner conflict in deciding whether or not they really do love a person instead of just going around dancing in circles saying, i love john, and later seeing the guy hooking up with a chick in the corner, and later running in circles saying i love mark. I know that a lot of people especially men, criticize the character edward because they believe that now women will unfallibly wait for a vampire love until the grow old, but I believe that edward is a good fictional character, not because he is (gorgeous) but because he raises the average standards for men especially the (today)man who has lost a lot of respect for women and lets just say anyone. ( i see it all the time, i live in the city and trust me when I say loss of respect. )

    As for Isabella Swan, Yes. She is clumsy. Yes. She is sometimes drowned in (edward)thoughts, but it is only because she is in love with him. Maybe it might have started with the fact that he is almost godlike but throughout the series her personality evolves and she does recognize his flaws (she mentions how he is always blaming himself for the damage that she causes upon herself and how he is extremely overprotective of her )and she does go beyond the means to break some of his rules.(hello. she went to la push while he was away, and also went to save her mom even though he told her DONT GO BELLA.) She is strength in character because she is stubborn, but she also shows her dominant side(hello. she convinced edward to have sexual intercouse with her even though he had said no.), and yet she can be completely fragile and defensless. Which in total equals perfect balance between both characters because they have a mutualistic relationship that evens out each others flaws.

    But since I am trying severely hard to sound diplomatic, i will end this with saying one thing, well several:

    I think that you are a person who is uncapable of reading such in depth literature because you are too consumed reading each line as if you were a grammar teacher. Ayyeeeee mate, I would love to see some of your emotional writing, I would like to see if you use original character names like bam bam noodle butt or dishwasher. Yeaaa, i know you love those because they are o-rigi-nal, not like edward or bella. Yeaaa you like that huh?huh? punk. Also, please define author, because I did not know that writing a novel had (rules)or even writing at all, in that case they should ban those damn haikus because they really do not say ish. The book is about love, not about the (Adventures of Alice: Seeing the future) or \\(A guide to controlling people emotions:Jasper) I think the only part in your reasons for hating twilight which where purposely trying to be funny, and that actually made me laugh was the Chuch Norris one. So kudos on that one. Yeaaa I am a die hard Twilight fan, and by the way if it werent called the Twilight Series, then should it be called (The phases of the day series, or maybe the phases of the moon series.( Ayyeee mate. Youre just stating the obvious, which doesntmake it a good reason for hating twilight.)

    Peace out.

  776. LauraLaura
    Posted June 23, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    Ok, you are a total hypocrite.You quote that twilight fans need to get a life. You came up with 95 reasons why u hate it. Hmm, i think its you who needs to get a life. You also say that all twilight fans are insane. You’re insane, does that mean every person that also hates twilght is insane? no. Now i have no problem with you coming on and saying what you think the books flaws are, thats fine. But what does how twilight fans act have anything to do with the book itself? You are basically coming on here and criticizing twilight fans for no reason, and that shoudnt be allowed. And i can guarentee you, twilight fans could come up with more than 95 reasons on why they do like twilight without having to criticize you and your fellow anti-twilghters

  777. Astrid
    Posted June 24, 2009 at 4:18 am

    I agree with everyone of your points. people may be pleased to know that at least one 12 year old – who read each one of the books – hates it with a passion.

  778. Clary
    Posted June 24, 2009 at 7:29 am

    Ok, look I think that everyone should just chill. Freedom of speech sure, but, come on people, opinions are something that people use to air their views. Twilight lovers on a “Why I hate Twilight” sight is just realy sad.

    THere asre a lot of books out there that are better, that’s true, like Vampire Diaries, The mortal instruments, Night world. Everyone of them is diffrent, everyone of them has a diffrent point of view. But in none of the books I have read have the vampires EVER been sparkly, glittery, shiny warawarawara. They do, however, burst into flames. Which is really cool.

    And thinking out 95 reasons as to why she hates twilight is not pathetic, it’s just a way to show how she feels about the whole stupid saga. And , also, no one ever said that the reasons had to make sense, I’m not going to tell anyone to get a llife, except maybe for the twilighters on this sight, but I am going to say that everyone should just calm down, Whoo saaa. Get it? Got it? Good.

    See ya

  779. Miette
    Posted June 24, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    brb, posting at evey school in walking distance.

  780. Chill
    Posted June 24, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    Dear Isabella,
    What kind of crak you been smoking, because the last time i check twiligth and its arthor was lame. Not everybody is gona like the same thing. SO stop getting your hair in a not a chilllaxs. I a book if you write a bokk you will egt some criyasume and that gose for me too.
    P.S Sory for saying crak
    PSS PLZ forget any spelling incoresins. Im not a good speller
    PSSS I hate Twilight

  781. Some person
    Posted June 25, 2009 at 1:40 am

    I was a really big Twilight fan… Now that I look back at it, I hate it. No offence to the real fans. It is going too far to say you’re going to kill someone though. I mean come on! It’s not real, it’s FICTION. So shut the hell up. When I was a big fan, and I mean a BIG fan, I would get really worked up about people bashing on edward and the book. But, I’m over it! Ya’ll are acting like obsessed children(I used to be one of you). But, just take a look at what you’re getting so pissed about..what?.. I’m sorry I couldn’t hear you…That’s right, PAPER, INK, AND A DREAM! (and a movie)

  782. point_blanc
    Posted June 25, 2009 at 6:56 am

    although,i may agree to some points but whoever wrote these reasons to hate twilight is just pathetic..
    most of the reasons aren’t enough reasons to hate twilight at all..please..do u have anything else to do?
    i am NOT a twilight fan, and i never got past book 1..
    but you shouldn’t hate Ms. Meyer if you want to criticize her book…
    ..and c’mon,what does Harry Potter,Light Yagami have to do with all this?Hello,NERD much!
    they’re fictional characters too..

  783. Posted June 25, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    lol. that was the best thing i have read in a while. Very amusing and just about 99% true. But i must say, its harsh to critisize Stephinie so bad. I dont think she is a terrible writer just because the plot of the stroy was cliche and the characters were a bit shallow. Have you read her other book The Host, that was pretty good, though i could not help but to notice that it was a bit similar to twilight. oh well

  784. Dexter
    Posted June 25, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    Congrats on telling it like it is dude. At this point i REALLY hate the stupid series because it pushed Harry Potter back 8 MONTHS. I hope someone assassinates Stephanie Meyer.

  785. ScribbledDoodles
    Posted June 26, 2009 at 6:01 am

    Hey, not all Twilight Fans spell badly, have their lives revolved around Edward or act like totally brain washed zombies who want to kill anyone who insults Twilight. :(

    But, I’ve got to agree with some points, like the one about Edward Cullen being a pedophile. When I was reading the book I kept laughing when he mentioned that he was 100 something. And, I would have been totally okay with Bella moving on and choosing Jacob. But, noooooooooooo. Oh, well.

    I liked the books though. Even, if alot of people say they suck.
    By the way, some of the points maybe found really offensive by some fans. So, yeah. Maybe you could tone down the hatred a tad bit ’cause not everyone hates Twilight.

  786. LauraLaura
    Posted June 26, 2009 at 7:28 am

    “Dexter” says he hopes someone assassinates Stephenie Meyer. This, i hope proves that it is not only Twilight fans who are violent. Yes some fans are a little crazy and will resort to physical violence if you diss the book. But please stop stereotyping. Things like all twilight fans are violent, obsessed and illiterate is just annoying because its not true. I am not going to say all anti-twilighters are crazy just because one of them wants to kill Stephenie Meyer. She’s isnt holding you down and making you read the damn book, she wrote it for those who like it, which there are a lot of. So stop judging the book because you dont like the fans. This is a website about books, not fans of books.

  787. Joseie Kiyokuro
    Posted June 26, 2009 at 10:07 am

    ScribbledDoodles: I don’t think the Author should do anything with the offensive points, it’s his/her opinion, why change it? If the Twilight fans don’t like, they shouldn’t be reading this, after of it’s called “Why I Hate Twilight”.

    LauraLaura: You say not all Twilight fans are violent, well I would like to believe you but from my personal experience I haven’t met any non-violent Twilight fans. All of them are so obsessed with that book they are ready to kill you and I’m not joking there. It is pathetic. Besides, Dexter wasn’t commenting on the Twilight fans, he was commenting on the writer, don’t confuse that. People are, in fact, discussing the book here, and nobody would even care about the fans if they weren’t making peoples lives harder.

    Everybody has a right for their opinion and if the Author of this 95 reasons puts them this way, it is his/her right to do so, besides the criticism is very good.

  788. Kayla
    Posted June 26, 2009 at 10:39 am

    yeah….so, some of these reasons…SUCK.
    i mean really…how are u supposed to know that Martin Luther would have hated it?
    And you mentioned the vampires sparkling like 3 times….I think you guys just needed a ton of reasons so people would look at the vast reasons why these books suck, and think, “Woah! These books must be awful cus some ppl came up with 95 reasons why their so bad!”
    But most of those reason are just junk….and stupid opinions.
    Like, the Bedward thing..
    #30. New hot couple name for Bella and Edward = Bedward

    That has NOTHING to do with the book…NOTHING, and just added one to ur stupid list.

  789. JEWJEW
    Posted June 26, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    Haha. You people are funny.

  790. Christina
    Posted June 26, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    lol…I love twilight. I’m not a teenage girl or in love with Edward. I love the fantasy, it’s fun to get into a book that is based on fantasy to get you out of reality for a little bit. Your 95 reasons are very funny and I think people who get offended by others who bad mouth twilight are even funnier.lol

  791. F.l.
    Posted June 27, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    Hello :)

    While I am happy that there are people that can give criticism longer than one angry sentence, I don’t think that any book should be crushed like that. Yes, it’s lame to be in ‘love’ with fictional characters, but pouring all your anger into hating them is not that great too.

    I’ve read a lot of books in my life, including most of the old classics, a lot of fantasy and crime novels and yes, several of S.King’s too.Reading Twilight was somewhat enjoyable and on my mind for a week or so…it was neither that great, nor that bad – definitely not worth obsessing over. Cliche plot and Mary-sue characters aren’t the best choice when writing a novel, but Twilight seems to have a little ’somethng’ that appeals to people and makes some of them happy – is that a bad thing, I ask? There are a lot of books worthy of reading out there, so if you don’t like this one – just go and pick another; I think doing that will be a better way of spending your time than bashing what others read( I’m not talking about this article, or well-rounded criticism – I’m talking about all the lame hate going around the Internet). And when a person obsesses over a fictional character – well, that speaks for itself about him/her – do we need to shout it to the world?

    That’s just my opinion on the matter, no offense to anyone. Whether a person likes/doesn’t like a book is up to them and their taste and shouldn’t be taken SO seriously :)

  792. Posted June 27, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    I think I died laughing. No, really I did, and now I am a vampire and have super awesom vampire powers… ehem…
    Anyway I agree 100% with you.

    ~TEEHEE~

  793. Issa
    Posted June 28, 2009 at 1:05 am

    those opinions were lame.
    &’ really? you would actually say that about a book, i mean come on have a life. i bet you were juss irritated to the girls who were obsessed with twilight. but whatever came out of yur head and said this lame stuff, get a life. if you think that twilight is a horrible book keep that to yurself, its yur opinion, no one wants to know.&’ i simply know that a lot of people dislike twilight, but still don’t judge it like that. seriously tho. if you hate it so much why don’t you juss say it to the authors face, since yu got the nerve to say alla’ that crap.

    skankkk .

  794. Issa
    Posted June 28, 2009 at 1:06 am

    those opinions were lame.
    and really? you would actually say that about a book, i mean come on have a life. i bet you were juss irritated to the girls who were obsessed with twilight. but whatever came out of yur head and said this lame stuff, get a life. if you think that twilight is a horrible book keep that to yurself, its yur opinion, no one wants to know. and i simply know that a lot of people dislike twilight, but still don’t judge it like that. seriously tho. if you hate it so much why don’t you juss say it to the authors face, since yu got the nerve to say all of that crap.

    skankkk .

  795. Issa
    Posted June 28, 2009 at 1:06 am

    those opinions were lame.
    and really? you would actually say that about a book, i mean come on have a life. i bet you were juss irritated to the girls who were obsessed with twilight. but whatever came out of yur head and said this lame stuff, get a life. if you think that twilight is a horrible book keep that to yurself, its yur opinion, no one wants to know. and i simply know that a lot of people dislike twilight, but still do not judge it like that. seriously tho. if you hate it so much why do not you juss say it to the authors face, since yu got the nerve to say all of that crap.

    skankkk .

  796. Mickey
    Posted June 28, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    I agree on many points. I think Meyer’s mormon beliefs really show in her books. Also she builds, builds, and builds to a big climax….and just has it end with everyone talking. like the rest of the book. In Breaking Dawn, the one thing i wanted to read was the battle part. and it didnt even happen. I hate how Meyer shows Bella, who is supposed to be the heroine, as a weak, stupid, and helpless girl. She doesnt really have any endearing qualitites but no character flaws either. This is my opinion, and any Twilight fans can go “OMG Edwrd is sooo HOTT” blog on Twilight sites.
    P.S. Issa– “yur” is not a word. it’s “your”. maybe go read some real literature and you will learn how to spell correctly.
    Also, how are we supposed to say this to the author’s face? Fly to where she lives? break into her house? The internet is for venting, honey.

  797. Posted June 29, 2009 at 2:21 am

    it sucks, i know a lot of girls who take the book to far.
    i call them the twilight fan club or the KKK.
    they piss me of way way way way more then fat mama jokes
    any one who likes it is dead to me!

  798. Vampire Girl
    Posted June 29, 2009 at 4:41 am

    I do agree! I don’t understand how people can love Twilight. Stephenie Meyer pays them to love her books. It has to be so simple, because you can’t really love theese books, can you?

  799. Cara
    Posted June 29, 2009 at 7:17 am

    And ‘furthermore’, has anyone else noticed that everyone standing up for twilight is A) using word’s too big for them to grasp how awkward their writing is, B) using words hysterically out of context, C) pathetically attempting to defend their hero by falling into the stereotypical twitard lingo (lyk OHEMGE! SHUT UPP!!!!! STEPTHENIE MEYER IS DA BOMBBA!) or D) trashing on more talented writers when they have nothing to back up their jabs with.

    JK Rowling has unreal talent. Harry Potter is 100000000000000000000000 times more imaginative, and better written than Twilight. Twilight is a flat-liner as a novel. Nothing happens during the course of the story to change the outcome. The whole saga is nothing short of unnecessary. And don’t you dare say that without Twilight you would have nothing to read.

    Try:

    The Vampire Diaries, The House Of Night Series, The Blue Bloods Series, The Evernight Series, The Evermore Series, The Awakening Series, The Vampire Academy Series, The Cirque Du Freak Series, etc.

    I could go on forever. The only reason anyone likes Twilight is because it hands you a cookie cutter fantasy on a platter and shoes big enough to fit any clown.

    I’m not saying that people can’t like Twilight. All I want is for them to shut the funk up about it. How would you like it if I ran through a public place screeching about whatever book I’m reading? (Which is Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, by the way. Totally awesome!)

    Okay. I’m done ranting.

    I loved your list :)

  800. Danielle
    Posted June 29, 2009 at 7:19 am

    Issa…was it really necessary to post that three times? Really? And you wonder why we think you’re insane.

    You tell her to get a life, and the term is GET a life, not have, when you just read 95 reasons why someone hates something you love.

    Why?

    So you could yell at them and call them bad names.

    I totally see the logic in your thinking! If you have a right to love it, you can bet your wooly socks we have a right to hate it. If I was to tell you that nobody wanted to hear your opinion one something, to shut the heck up, you wouldn’t appreciate it would you now?

    So don’t tell us to shut up pretty please, because thats just downright rude. We can judge it however we want to.

    PS. Calling people skanks isn’t good for your image. Don’t.

  801. Danielle
    Posted June 29, 2009 at 7:29 am

    Cara, you are my theoretical Goddes, and you are totally and entirely right. Thank you.

    WOOT! You’re list was made of awesome and major cool. Children should aspire to grow up to be like you.

  802. Cara
    Posted June 29, 2009 at 7:34 am

    PS. WTF is a nebulous? Do you people even know what you’re saying?

  803. Posted June 29, 2009 at 8:09 pm

    WHAT!!!!

    I <3 TWILIGHT!

    GET A LIFE!!!!!!!

    FACE IT TWILIGHT ROX!!!!!

    I HAVE TSO
    TWILIGHT SERIES OBSESSION

  804. Caroline
    Posted June 29, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    Excerpt: “Engine snarling like a hunting panther, the car jolted forward so fast that my body slammed into the black leather seat and my stomach flattened against my spine. “Arg!” I gasped as I fumbled for the brake.”

    Sentences such as this one make me laugh. What poor writing!
    The first page of the excerpt couldn’t even hold my attention.
    The books pretty much teach teenagers to confuse love with infatuation, especially physical–if not downright sexual–infatuation. Sure, agree to marry a guy–and at such a young age–who thinks you need permission from him to see one of your friends. That’s brilliant.

    You can like the series if you want…but why would you? Do people see the same things I am but just don’t care because they like shallow, dramatic teenage romance that makes people like me roll my eyes?

    Brinna, you DID make some good points, and not all the 95 reasons this site provided were well-constructed, or even real reasons to not read the series. Some weren’t even true (such as, teenage girls don’t fall in love instantly?!). But overall, I think the points are very valid.

  805. Caroline
    Posted June 29, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    Wow, Isabella, get a life.
    Mickey, I agree all the way.

  806. Jeffrey
    Posted June 30, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    I am a man. Or a boy. 19 years old, you decide. Anyway, I hated Twilight before I read it. I bought it for laughs, knowing all of the criticisms of the book. The plot and purple prose were everything I expected. Every time the book described their undying love for each other, I felt like I was reading a 14 year old girl’s diary about her newest boyfriend. The vampire part was just an excuse to validate it for all eternity. It was all a disgusting co-dependent fantasy about the perfect man.

    But somehow, I still enjoyed the book. Go figure.

  807. Bella
    Posted July 2, 2009 at 3:04 am

    I hate twilight so much and i am completely ashamed that my name is being used in such a lame way. I must say, i hate no idea how twilight was a good idea for a movie.

  808. EdwardIsGayLitterally
    Posted July 2, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    “Rofl, love it! Here’s one for you… a friend of mine had a coworker tell him that his girlfriend dumped him because he “wasn’t anything like her Edward”. He thought she was cheating on him… until he found out she meant Edward from Twilight! Can you imagine being dumped because you weren’t enough like a fictional douchbag?”

    Lol, the comments are just as hilarious as the article. Especially when a fangirl gets on. :P

    PLEASE, PLEASE do more :D

  809. Michelle
    Posted July 3, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    This is driving me crazy! Well the comments are anyways. Everyone is voicing there opinions and getting mad at each other for getting mad at the post and loving Twilight. Get a life. As for the actual post it has some good points. Although it was filled with space fillers and errors. Don’t any of you people have anything better to do than this

  810. Suck it, betch;]
    Posted July 4, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    Lol I like Twilight, but this list made me laugh a lot.. It was also funny that you were complaining about grammar, when you had a few mistakes, too, but we aren’t perfect. Lol:] Nicely done:D

  811. Maressa
    Posted July 5, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    I LOVE Twilight. Just because you read a book does not mean you worship it. Not only do I think you’re stupid and pathetic but the fact that you and other sad, pathetic and lifeless people actually made 95 “reasons” you hate Twilight is just sad. This is more of 5 reasons, 10 at the most. You are just repeating yourself. Obviously, you are most likely someone who is uneducated and are angry because it’s not sad and depressing like Harry Potter. The comment you made about fancy adjectives probably made you angry because you had to read the entire book with a dictionary sitting right next to you. And honestly, you can’t judge a series without reading the entire thing, that’s just being plain ignorant. Also, this book probably also pisses you and the other 30 year old obese friendless people off is because unlike any of you, Bella and the rest of us in the human race actually have friends and family who love and care about us. Edward is not a pedophile because obviously, if you read as many vampire books as you say you do, you’d most likely realize that in quite a few there’s tons of love in there, and they’re centuries old. Also, none of us care about what you find kinky, with that whole bit about the Twilight series being complete trash because there’s no real sex. Why do you think so many women love it? It shows what men SHOULD be like. Not at all like the world we have today, where people go around getting knocked up at 12 and getting STDs from guy or girl who’s name they can’t even remember, probably like you did in your younger years. And no, Jacob isn’t a pedophile because he’s not in love with Renesmee, he’s her best friend. I mean, like you, the following is my opinion, but I would absolutely LOVE to have a guy that doesn’t want anything bad to happen to me and would anything for me, no matter what it is, and no mater what time or reason. Besides, just because somebody somewhere said this is what a vampire is, it doesn’t mean it is. It’s an opinion, and Stephenie Meyer projected her own. Besides, if you’re actually going to have the nerve to criticize Twilight, grow some balls and criticize Romeo & Juliet, seeing as it’s the same concept of teenage love. Oh, and on last thing: if you’re actually stupid enough to say Renesmee isn’t a real name because it’s combined, it’s common to do that, something only an educated person would know. If you think that name is stupid, you prbably think names such as Sheneequah, Shenaynay, Bonquiqui, LaFonda, Latifah, or Shontelle are stupid.

  812. Mephisto
    Posted July 6, 2009 at 12:32 am

    okay, so this was entertaining and mind numbing. the list was the entertaing part. the fangirls and guys were the mind-numbing part. ha ha, some of the defence reasons were just retarded. for example: the response to bella not having a mind was “everyone has a mind”. that should be enough for you. but just in case “her future IS edward”. ahem, you’re only serving to prove her/their points. it’s truly and wholesomely best if you just do not comment this or visit this page. most, if not all of these points are true. some are just fun little tidbits that have less to do with the book, but never-the-less, she/they are right. this is a sad, unoriginal, plotless, insult to the male and female genders, literature, and, in a weird way, paedophiles. and let’s not forget that it underminds the whole “think for yourself” way of life.

    Thank you for your time. Yours truly,

    Mephisto

  813. Posted July 6, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    i love twilight, but i will admit stephanie meyer saying edward was a vampire on the back of the book made the book less interesting

  814. glittery/sparklepooh.
    Posted July 7, 2009 at 6:02 am

    “What is Bella’s favorite colour? Blue, becuase Edward said so.”
    That really made me laugh because it’s true. cara, you are awesome.

    And, as for overly obsessed, Edward loving, twilight worshipping, teenage fan girls, they just really make me laugh because some of them are just really pathitic. Telling them to get a life is way too easy. I think the correct term would be to become a vampire, marry fictional Edward, annoy freaky-ass Italian vampires and have a lot of sex while your daughter is in the other room sleeping. That’ll really make your day. Haha

    And has anyone noticed that Bella doesn’t actually fight during the entire series either? Is she that pathetic at everything? I mean, really. I feel sorry for people who haven’t read any REAL vampire books. Vampire Diaries is awesome, so is Blue Boods.

    The people I loved the most in Twilight were Jacob, for anoying the crap out of Edward, Emmette, for anoying the crap out of Edward, and the Volturi, for almost killing Edward. Its a shame that they didn’t, maybe then Bella would get a personality.

    And also, yes, Shaneequah is a stupid name. whahaha.

    I love the people on this sight, espesialy the opinionated ones.

  815. Helen
    Posted July 7, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    thats soo true :D

  816. Becka.
    Posted July 8, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    I love twilight. It wasn’t what i expected which is why i like it. During twilight, stephenie has broken all the rules when it comes to vampires. You said that stephenie said that vamps can’t have children, that’s true. None of the Cullen women, like, Rosalie, Alice or Esme can have children because their vampires. Their bodies can’t change in order to have children. Bella’s body CAN change, she’s still human.
    Since you criticise stephenie so harshly, i think that YOU should write a book and then publish it on the internet.

  817. random person #8
    Posted July 9, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    i think that the twilight saga was great and was outraged that someone would make this page. quiet fanquetly i think your writting is the only thing that stinks and that u do 2. i dont care what people think because this is my opion and no1 elses.

    THANKS:p

    RANDOM PERSON #8

  818. twilight#1HATERS
    Posted July 9, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    Reasons I hate Twilight-
    When I read Twilight, I swear half of my brain melted.
    Edward Cullen looks like my ass, but my ass doesnt have fleas.
    Look at Bella’s new haircut, instead of being with Edward, I guess she was trying to have matching hair.
    I wonder how Edward lovers read the book, they are obviously blind to think Edward is attractive.
    There are too many reasons to write.

    By the way, if you are a twilight fan I am going to come to your door and beat you up with the hardcover edition of all four Twilight books… but dont worry since you have all those “magical vampire powers” from reading the book. Oh, and you can have all four of mine, I don’t want them. You can have my contacts too, you need them WAY more then I do if you think Edward is cute. Edward doesn’t need “powers” all he needs is his ugly face and bug infested hair to kill someone.

  819. Light Yagami :)
    Posted July 10, 2009 at 3:38 am

    haha, funny :) The reason why the series are so popular is because Edward depicts teenage girls/ females’ (I know someone who is 38 and enjoys reading the series) ultimate fantasy in what they want in a man. They want somebody who is more superior – richer, stronger, smarter.. etc I mean.. when it comes to other things than finding a boyfriend/husband, women DO want equality, but when it comes to finding their man, they prefer someone who is superior. It’s true. I know I’ll get bashed.

    I don’t think the series should be read by really young girls, because it’s just not right. It’s self-explanatory.

    Most people read it for the storyline. It’s not really about literature – I mean people aren’t doing ’studies’ on it.. it’s just a fictional book right?

    Anyway I know a guy that reads Twilight. He’s my cousin in fact. :)

  820. Me,me,me!!!!
    Posted July 10, 2009 at 7:09 am

    Aaaaah, and the pathetic fan girl attacks continue.

    “Top story in today’s news; Random person#8 was spotted outside of an internet cafe’ yelling at random teenagers who had metioned that Twilight is “unsatisfactory litterature, and should be taken off all shelves” Atfer about five minutes of yelling “Random person#8″ broke down in tears sobbing, “Twilight is an AWESOME book, and Edward IS hot, and you just have really suckish taste and should be burnt for critiscizing literature of such pheanomenon class and quality.”

    Fan girls get a little crazy sometimes.

    Obsessed fan girls go over board and start yelling at random people. I’ll probably get bashed for this comment, too, but, seriously, is it too much to ask that fans stay OFF an I hate twilight site if the are going to get all BLEH! I hate you every time?

  821. Greece
    Posted July 13, 2009 at 3:21 am

    whats wrong with u, twiligt is the best book ever, and edward is so hot, your so jelous

    jk

    No, Twilight is not the best book ever, and no, i’m not a fan thank god.

    I have many reasons why I hate Twilight, and only one reason why I love it, if you noticed somethng, since Twilight became so popular the Jonas Brothers’ popularity seemed to decrease.

    One of the reasons why I hate Twilight, is because it braught us Twilight Fans, which are the ones that braught the low reputtion to the book series.

    I don’t hate Twilight, I hate Twilight Fans. There are a lot of vampire fans that read the books, say “it’s ok, not that bad” and move on reading another vampire books. But Twilight fans call them selfelfs “Vampire lovers” and don’t know anything about vampires.

    Mayers, not the best auhor ever, but not the worst either, but for her age whe should write something better than that. I bet that Amelia Atwater Rohdes probably wrote a better book when she was 13.

    I could go on and on, but I have to go back to write my own vampire books that I starte thinking about before Twilight was even published, and I don’t want to write 500 lines of what we already know, Twilight fans are stupid.

  822. JenniLee
    Posted July 13, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    Okay, well I will probably get bashed for this, but I have a few comments to make. Read the whole thing before you start yelling at me. Well first off, I think that the Twilight Saga is a good series. After reading this list, I do understand that some of these reasons are very well thought out, and do make sense, while others seem to have been just slapped on your list to make it longer.

    The first thing I would like to point out is how people are saying, “we can write this list because if other people have a right to love the books, we have a right to hate it.” I completely agree that you have a right to hate it, but why broadcast a huge list all over the internet? Authors spend much of their time trying to write books and they put a lot of effort into their books, for the benefit of fans. But to write something, put most of your effort into it, and then have people bash it, well that would make you feel bad, wouldn’t it? Obviously Stephenie Meyer realizes that this book will not be liked by everyone, and that’s perfectly normal, but why make her feel worse? Same with musicians; they are not liked by everyone, but when someone criticizes their work publicly, it would give them a glum feeling.

    Another comment I have, is that some people are writing things on here such as ‘Edward is ugly, of course I hate him.” I thought we were on here to criticize the books, not the movie, so rethink what you write before you write it.

    Any of the reasons on the list that say Stephenie Meyer is defying rules by making her vampires sparkle, and not mentioning fangs, is quite dumb. She has her own vision of what vampires are, and who would want to read these books if they had the predictable vampire characters?

    As for saying that Bella’s father always leaves her alone, and that normal fathers don’t do that? Yes, well some actually do. Not all, but there is the occasional father that does, such as mine.

    Stephenie can’t think of original names? When is the last time you have heard Bella, Esme, Rosalie, Jasper, Emmett, Edward, and Carlisle all over the streets? Granted, the humans in the books (such as Mike, Angela, and Jessica) do not have original names, but you cannot sit there and say that none of them are original except for Renesme.

    Also, since when could vampires not get people pregnant? Once again, Stephenie Meyer is shaking it up a little by playing around with what vampires actually are. You cannot blame her for not falling into using the vampire stereotype, can you?

    The last thing I can think of now, is how many of your reasons are stating that Twilight fans are horrid. Once again, we are on this website to talk about the books, not about the fans. Sure they get annoying, but you tell them to stop talking about Twilight, not blame them for the reason you hate the books.

    I cannot think of anything else wrong with this list now, but if I do, I will post another comment.

    I am not trying to bash your list, I am just trying to prove a point that not all of your reasons are worth listing.

  823. Posted July 13, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    Okay, well I will probably get bashed for this, but I have a few comments to make. Read the whole thing before you start yelling at me. Well first off, I think that the Twilight Saga is a good series. After reading this list, I do understand that some of these reasons are very well thought out, and do make sense, while others seem to have been just slapped on your list to make it longer.

    The first thing I would like to point out is how people are saying, \”we can write this list because if other people have a right to love the books, we have a right to hate it.” I completely agree that you have a right to hate it, but why broadcast a huge list all over the internet? Authors spend much of their time trying to write books and they put a lot of effort into their books, for the benefit of fans. But to write something, put most of your effort into it, and then have people bash it, well that would make you feel bad, wouldn\’t it? Obviously Stephenie Meyer realizes that this book will not be liked by everyone, and that\’s perfectly normal, but why make her feel worse? Same with musicians; they are not liked by everyone, but when someone criticizes their work publicly, it would give them a glum feeling.

    Another comment I have, is that some people are writing things on here such as \’Edward is ugly, of course I hate him.\” I thought we were on here to criticize the books, not the movie, so rethink what you write before you write it.

    Any of the reasons on the list that say Stephenie Meyer is defying rules by making her vampires sparkle, and not mentioning fangs, is quite dumb. She has her own vision of what vampires are, and who would want to read these books if they had the predictable vampire characters?

    As for saying that Bella\’s father always leaves her alone, and that normal fathers don\’t do that? Yes, well some actually do. Not all, but there is the occasional father that does, such as mine.

    Stephenie can\’t think of original names? When is the last time you have heard Bella, Esme, Rosalie, Jasper, Emmett, Edward, and Carlisle all over the streets? Granted, the humans in the books (such as Mike, Angela, and Jessica) do not have original names, but you cannot sit there and say that none of them are original except for Renesme.

    Also, since when could vampires not get people pregnant? Once again, Stephenie Meyer is shaking it up a little by playing around with what vampires actually are. You cannot blame her for not falling into using the vampire stereotype, can you?

    The last thing I can think of now, is how many of your reasons are stating that Twilight fans are horrid. Once again, we are on this website to talk about the books, not about the fans. Sure they get annoying, but you tell them to stop talking about Twilight, not blame them for the reason you hate the books.

    I cannot think of anything else wrong with this list now, but if I do, I will post another comment.

    I am not trying to bash your list, I am just trying to prove a point that not all of your reasons are worth listing.

  824. Posted July 13, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    Ignore the slash marks in my comment above, they were inserted when a posted my previous comment.

  825. TWILIGHT IS A BALL SUCKER
    Posted July 14, 2009 at 3:12 am

    lol my spelling sucks cause i type fast, u can complain about it i dont really give a crap, kkkkkkkk

  826. Becca
    Posted July 14, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    okay so i liked twilight… but it was terribly written… it couldve been much better… and i really dont believe it deserves all the hype its getting… plus robert whatshisface… really is not hot at all… and the movie sucked even worse then the book… but really i read the book.. and all i have to say is… if “edward cullen” fell in love with me… i would gladly reject him for someone sayy…. human?

  827. Becca
    Posted July 14, 2009 at 7:01 pm

    oh but i would also like to add.. that i know several guys that read twlight… and they are straight as they come…

    and also.. i completely agree that some twilight fans are totally psycho!.. a girl i know… wants to buy the crappyest truck she can find just because bella has a crappy truck.. also she only dated this one kid because his middle name was edward…

    and i think that you are entitled to your own opinion of what a vampire should be, and meyers is too. like if i think vampires are sparkley and dont have fangs and arent as terrible as folklore says, whats it matter? if i think so, fine. if you think they are bloodsucking, fanged, not sparkling, evil creatures, thats fine i dont criticize your opinions

  828. Jasper myers
    Posted July 15, 2009 at 1:08 am

    u ar my hero also reason 96= angel and or buffy could totally kill the whole charcters cast of twilight also shiny vampires i mean come on even too human has a better reason for vampires being invulnerable to the sun also i thinks the average twlight fans/groupies brain size is that of a molecule and vampires exist as a sexual metaphor so they dont deserve to be emo/deppressive manic stalker weird ass vampires i mean wth people this is coming from an australian enemy of twilight so we dont have it as bad as u yanks but hey united by ideals i guess [oh god the groupies are coming!!!!!]

    Twilight hater 4 ever

  829. Pen
    Posted July 15, 2009 at 7:40 am

    roflcoptamayo lol :P reason 12 says it all.

  830. Nadia
    Posted July 15, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    Wow. There are way too many comments on this post. (My post included.) First off, why do people need a valid reason to hate anything? I hate American Idol winners and to this day, I still don’t know why.

    The comments people made above are all valid (some have VERY good points and kind of made me feel like an ass for not liking Twilight) and everyone needs to chill out. Twilight and New Moon are awful Straight up. I won’t give an opinion on the whole series because I haven’t read it. But what I did read made my head hurt. The books were boring an unoriginal. For the first 5 chapters of Twilight, I enjoyed that. But when the plot didn’t pick up, I got irritated. So I put it down, read some Harry Potter, felt my IQ drop 5 points and started again. It’s no big deal.

    I’m not hating on the fans themselves (though the ones I know ARE insane), but I will just say that I don’t understand the appeal of this book. I just don’t. And if you tried to explain it to me, I still don’t think I would understand. At all.

    By the way, my friend and I are making the Light Yagami reason into a t-shirt.

  831. Mary
    Posted July 15, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    okay first of all twilight is a pretty good book but you dont have to like it! but to me it seems like you really dislike twilight alot! and thats okay but for someone who hates it that much why would you take the time to write 95 reasons why you hate it all you have to say is i dont like twilight or i hate it .. i find this pretty sad for someone to spend there time writing this. i kinda feel bad for you if you have this much time to write this cus you must have read all the books and then write this. i do agree with some of your reasons tho!

  832. Posted July 15, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    okay first of all twilight is a pretty good book but you dont have to like it! but to me it seems like you really dislike twilight alot! and thats okay but for someone who hates it that much why would you take the time to write 95 reasons why you hate it all you have to say is i dont like twilight or i hate it .. i find this pretty sad for someone to spend there time writing this. i kinda feel bad for you if you have this much time to write this cus you must have read all the books and then write this. i do agree with some of your reasons tho!

  833. Posted July 15, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    I just love this! (:

    You guys may want to read my article on Twilight

    http://bookstove.com/fantasy/the-twilight-case-its-not-what-it-looks-like/

  834. Vincent
    Posted July 16, 2009 at 12:07 am

    LOL I don’t know why but I’ve had a burning passion to hate this series ever since I recall hearing about it. Too many girls in my high school (last senior year 2008) had loved the series as though it was the new Harry Potter. I mean Harry Potter was a great series in my opinion… but honestly Twilight sounds horrible and there’s been a movie out already…I think it’s just a fad though… like boy bands or something.

    P.S. To those Twilight fans I may have offended… I hate because I can.

  835. Posted July 16, 2009 at 12:47 am

    Honestly, I’m not obsessed but I do have to say, you’ve wasted time writing all of this just to be a b*tch and talk about how you hate something? At least when Twilight fans go online and make fan sites or read the books a billion times or obsess over a character, they’re doing it outta something they love. Not coming online to make a “why I hate Twilight” article.. that’s pretty pathetic. Grow up. “Vampires can’t get people pregnant. SPOILER!”-Hahahah. Let me re-word that for you “VAMPIRE’S DON’T EXIST. ZPO1L3R.” Stupid ass. AGAIN just part of the story SHE MADE. IT’S NOT REAL SO SHUT UP. And another thing, “Stephen King agrees that Stephanie Meyer can’t write ‘worth a darn’.” Um hi, so when did Stephen King become the God of books, idiot? Just cause he says that doesn’t mean crap. He’s just butthurt he’s not in the spotlight anymore :) one more… “Straight men sparkle?” Ha okay, uhh Kids can get a visit from an owl and the owl will give them a letter telling them they’re Wizards? Oh NO! That’s not real either is it?! Oh anddd maybe one day a Hobbit will come to my door and take me to middle earth so I can burn a magical ring with my skitzo friend Gollum. Harry Potter and Lord Of the Rings were both amazing stories as well. There’s stuff in it that’s not real cause it’s a Fantasy book. It’s part of the book. Get a life man let them enjoy the story dang. Twilight obsessed people continue! Ignore the haters. Make your websites cause you’re doing it outta passion while these dumbbells are doing it outta hate. Pft that’s a lot worse. By the way, the books were great. Peaceee

  836. Googlooooidian
    Posted July 16, 2009 at 10:20 pm

    I love you = D The first reasons were everything I\’d ever thought. I love you all list-writers.

    Twilight fans… go find Edward… and according to him, he should be in hell = D

  837. Anonymous
    Posted July 18, 2009 at 8:59 am

    I love lists like these. :)

    Aside from the baseless plot, I really hate the grammatical errors. Whatever happened to proof reading?

  838. Charlotte
    Posted July 18, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    Okay. Seriously? I LOVE THIS! It’s totally true. I’m thinking of taking all four books and setting them on fire. Then, I’ll take the ashes and put them in a bottle labeled “Poison”. That is how badly this book SUCKS!

    Hey, I can write too! I’m even better than Stephanie Meyer! I’m 14!!! Maybe I’ll publish a book and dedicate it to Meyer by saying “To Meyer, who showed me that writers, no matter their ability can get published.”

    I really don’t like the series.

  839. Kagura
    Posted July 18, 2009 at 6:47 pm

    While I kind of like Twilight, I have to agree with the points you made, and I laughed at some of them =) Thank you for posting this

  840. Posted July 19, 2009 at 3:31 am

    Coolio. EPIC WIN.

  841. Lucius
    Posted July 19, 2009 at 6:44 pm

    My English teacher likened it to “literary heroin” because, “Once you start you can’t stop.”

    I must be able to quit heroin quite easily, then. I read the first three pages of book one, dropped it, closed my eyes, and thought about what I just read. It was awful.

  842. Caroline
    Posted July 19, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    I couldn’t even finish the first chapter of “Twilight”. The book is like a litmus test for idiocy.

    I agree with ALL of the things you said, and lmao, why would Twilight fans read this anyway?

  843. sarah
    Posted July 19, 2009 at 10:32 pm

    I used to love twilight, but when i started reading the 2nd book, i began to realize that something was wrong with the story… THE PLOT CRAPS.

    I agree to all 95 reasons that you wrote. It’s perfect~ Stupid book series, I hate it!

    It took me one year to read the third book (though i still haven’t finish reading it yet) , and i haven’t started with the fourth. It’s the first time that it took me so long to read. It’s that bad! I have to FORCE MYSELF to read it to the end to know what happen next, and then, like you said, laugh about it…

    Waste of my own money to buy the series… ugh.

    I’m glad I found this wonderful website. Thanks for the wonderful list…

  844. sarah
    Posted July 19, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    I used to love twilight, but when i started reading the 2nd book, i began to realize that something was wrong with the story… THE PLOT CRAPS.

    I agree to all 95 reasons that you wrote. It\’s perfect~ Stupid book series, I hate it!

    It took me one year to read the third book (though i still haven\’t finish reading it yet) , and i haven\’t started with the fourth. It\’s the first time that it took me so long to read. It\’s that bad! I have to FORCE MYSELF to read it to the end to know what happen next, and then, like you said, laugh about it…

    Waste of my own money to buy the series… ugh.

    I\’m glad I found this wonderful website. Thanks for the wonderful list…

  845. A Human
    Posted July 19, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    Basically, this is what I would add from Edward’s thoughts:

    96. “Bella I love you so much because you smell good”
    97. “Bella I love you so much because you’re squishy”
    98. “Bella I love you so much because you talk like a man (since i’m a girl)”
    99. “Bella thanks for using tampons for me”
    100. And also, when she finds a new, big, fancy word to play with she uses it near ten times on the same page(actually my friend noticed this)
    101. People say that other vampire books are rip-offs of Twilight(not true) Twilight is actually the rip-off
    102. Basically, what Stephanie Meyer is telling us is that she got this sucky idea because she dreamed of a glittering guy named Edward.
    103. It is so realistic that normal people don’t REALIZE that the Cullens are floating white people, oh! and also that they’re anorexic.
    104. Really? Edward likes blood? then why bother covering that up with strawberry shampoo…really…
    105. This is a rip-off of the Nightworld Series written by L.J. Smith in 1998 (I recommend people read it… SUPER good, if you like action, good grammar, thriller, and romance PLUS the book has original names like Rashel and Quinn<<my two fave charcters.^-^ and it’s cheap! The concept is bascially three stories in each book[all revolving around the same concept] and somehow they all connect…)
    106. I can’t believe that Twilight even beat the Night World Series(they just have sucky covers….I have to admit)

  846. Giselle
    Posted July 19, 2009 at 11:58 pm

    When i started twilight i loved it. I thought there wasnt a book in the world that could top this….so i gave it to my friends..and those friends gave it to other friends…until it turned into a twilight love fest. They talked about it every day of every second..and my hatred of this book slowly came. I then question the plot of this book..and it was a total downer. Bella was AH-NOYING! i wish the bitch died when she fell off the cliff ! and as this hatred started comming i started to love jacob more and more and started likeing edward less and less. he is obssessive and soo melodramatic! this book sucked…but i had to find out what happens and i read every book in the series…so far my favorite couple is nessie and jacob.
    I thought i could never read stephenie meyers books again…but then i stumbled upon “the host”…the beginning was horrible..but as the 100th page passed by..i was hooked… the drama was overwhelming! i had no idea who my favorite character was..or who i wanted to live..or which guy was the greatest..and till this day “The Host” by stephenie meyer is my all time favorite book..i recommend this book to everyone! even those who love and hate twilight..along with this reccomendation i will say that people who love reading as much as i do should read “The Private Series” by kate brian! (deffinatly read this book! i have been stuck on it for years!) the vampire academy series, the house of night series, the A-list series, The gossip girl series, the It girl series, anything by sarah dessen and many more!

  847. The Human
    Posted July 20, 2009 at 12:00 am

    Oh yea and also one more thing. If you already read it the first time….read it the second time and you’ll realize how bad it is(this is what I did….but I still realized it the first time :P )

  848. Random User
    Posted July 20, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    Twilight is so stupid the real storyline when you think about it is so stupid and pointless it doesnt deserve to be a great book! I dont know why people have to make a big deal about it! THE STORY IS BS!!!!!!!! BELLA IS UGLY AND EDWARD IS HOMO!! ITS A DISGRACE TO ALL NOVELS!!!!!! – Randomuser :)

  849. Poopy
    Posted July 21, 2009 at 12:55 am

    Twilight is for fat chicks who a) don’t read good books and b) can’t get a man.

    YUCK!

  850. Night shift Guy
    Posted July 21, 2009 at 10:47 am

    Firstly I love the writer of this list.
    I have not read the book nor seen the film but I hate the thing already as I’m just a poor nightshift worker who gets creeped out by vampire fangirls during the day due to living somewhat nocturnally due to my career. It doesn’t help I have natural fangs (in reality they’re just ever so slightly longer than the teeth next to them and a little pointy, not like stereotypical vampire teeth) combined with a light sensitivity and pale skin from working at night and sleeping most days.

    Why can’t the vampire lovers have been 20 something hotties instead of preteen young teen girls? Sadface.

  851. Posted July 21, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    HEY I admit that twilight those have some flaws but still the series is pretty good even I have to admit!

  852. Posted July 21, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    You know I agree with you 100% These books and the movie even, a total disgrace to the vampire nation! I liked vampires before this teeny bopper phase! My cousin is 13 and her friends and her worship Twilight. I liked vampires growing up too, but at least the books I read were good ones. Anyone remember Christopher Pike’s last vampire series? That is where I started. Before vampires “sparkled” how dumb is that! This author was definitely after the younger audiences, I’m pretty sure, this fad too shall pass.

  853. Caitygirl120
    Posted July 21, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    ok, so this list made me laugh…a lot. to reiterate many of the points made in said list, please follow the attached link and see for yourself a real, live (or undead?) Twifan freaking out, and basically having an orgasmic experience while watching the trailer for New Moon for the first time.

    You’re welcome.

    And (I do know that a sentence shouldn’t start with “and,” but this is needed) for all of those crazy obsessed Twilight fans out there comparing the Harry Potter series to the snot rag that is Twilight…don’t. J.K. Rowling understands how to grab hold of her readers using correct grammar, sentence structure, and flow…S. Meyers, not so much.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLvNGZjMt8I&feature=fvw

  854. Caitygirl120
    Posted July 21, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    I was scrolling through some of the comments, and happened upon this one…It would appear as though the author of this comment has taken after Mrs. Meyers as far as grammar is concerned.

    #
    JJ Twilight Freak
    Posted May 12, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    You know what I have to say? Quit criticizing twilight! If you don’t like it oh well.

    Answers:

    1.) Bella isn’t perfect… she’s clumsy and most girls are. Bella lives in her own world and most girls dont.

    2.)Edward dosnt always catch her. What about Jacob? Forget him too? Yeah well, friends do always catch you when you fall.

    3.) She does to do stuff without Edward. So you are forgetting Jacob! Well, let me tell you that you are wrong!

    4.) She dosnt try to commit it! Get a life! She is cliff-diving FYI! Try it sometime!

    5.)Bella is not Steph! Steph is not Bella.

    6.)The books are well written! Thats why it was made into a movie and plus there making the whole series. So there! Plus Twilight has a million fans!

    7.)What Vampire rules? Trying to scare little kids now right? Well I never liked Dracula anyways.. he was lame!

    8.) Same as 7

    9.) Sorry. And so what if they like Alice or Rosalie? Then Jasper and Emmet are for them. Seriously, the book would influence those boys if they read it.

    10.) GIVE JACOB CREDIT TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!

    So JJ Twilight lover (ME) will be back! Dont worry
    #
    JJ Twilight Freak
    Posted May 12, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    Ok so I am back

    11.) Something inhuman wouldnt have flaws. Mythical creature? DUH!

    12.) You call me a loser! No, I know you didnt call ME a loser! I have plenty of friends and 2 BFF’s! I am no loser! You shouldnt call people losers because they like something. Everybody that agrees with this loser are losers too. 3x the loserness!

    13.) This is in Bella’s point of view. she dosnt think she’s special. She’s got low self-esteem. look it up

    14.) When Bellas a vampire she takes a huge step up. edward would’ve killed Renesme FYI. Bella took control though!

    15.)Guess what?! They dont know each other well. It’d be awkward!

    16.) Guess what? You lack of that!You probably cant read!

    17.) She is a regular whining useless girl then. All girls are like that… but never useless. she cooks for charlie. call that useless?

    Peace

    Reading this comment was almost as fun as reading the list its self.

    **Peace**

  855. Lorraine
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 2:07 am

    I will never touch these books or let along read them. I’ll stick to writers that are actually good like JK Rowling, J R Tolkien, Jodi Picoult (chick novels), Kathy Reich( she writes amazing forensic anthropology novels with started the show Bones)

  856. ChaoticDreaming
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 11:13 am

    I’m currently reading the fourth book, but at this point only because I’m curious where the writer is going out of some masochistic desire of my own.

    I find Bella annoying and completely lacking of independent thought, even prior to meeting Edward. While I think the new ideas involving vampires in this series are campy and ridiculous, I do applaud Myers for attempting to be original, or as original as one can get with the vampire concept. Edward is over protective, at times abusive, and for someone who has lived as long as he has, lacks the wisdom that comes with age. The story was not thought out very well and has gaping plot holes that are hard to ignore.

    While reading it I sometimes wish that Buffy or Lestat will pop in and bring depth to the bland plot, but I’m left disappointed that not even my own imagination can brighten such a dreary excuse for story. Teen girls, however, are mostly shallow self absorbed creatures and it doesn’t surprise me that they have taken to this drivel with such ferocity. I hope when they grow up that the sudden reality shock doesn’t hurt them permanently.

  857. Sam
    Posted July 23, 2009 at 3:44 am

    There are way too many people willing to bash this author’s opinion while shouting their own. You can have a rational discourse but this comment flamage is nothing but teen fueled hysterics.

    Not everyone is going to worship these damn books, get over it. This author has a sense of humour which too many posters here need to ask for Santa to bring them this year. Your fanatical, borderline, extremist behaviour towards others shows immaturity and a heavy reliance on others thinking for you.
    That is a damn sad state of affairs for the young girls who are to become the women of tomorrow

  858. anya
    Posted July 23, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    thankyou so much
    at least some other people agree that it is rubbish and is not meant to be so overrated. Worst piece of literature I have ever come across,

  859. Kim-chi
    Posted July 24, 2009 at 11:56 pm

    There are lot’s of people who say, if you don’t read it you wont understand it.

    Well, i read it and…. i wasted a good few nights. I found nothing appealing in the series but i have picked up Myer’s new book the Host and the first chapter or so did convince me to give her a second chance. Of course, just now the love of her life has entered the story. This opinion may change very fast.

    I do not hate the series, i just don’t like. I find much more enjoyment reading posts such as this one than i did all the books combined. I think that says something.

    There are lot’s of girls who swoon at the mention of Edward, i am happy to say i am made of sterner stuff. I mean, i have my weak spots for some fictional men but… i suppose i’m different because i’ve read so many other books. I’m not saying illiterate people love Twilight, i’m just saying i have have seen all that already and it’s uninteresting and predictable.

    everyone i know who has read and loved it are either girls who rarely even saw a book before Twilight, or read Nora Robert’s books or similar almost religiously.

  860. Anna
    Posted July 25, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    I totally agree! I just think it’s crazy how there are 10 year old girls running around in my neighborhood screaming about how the just adore Edward and want to marry him…his not real get over it! I also think that this book it a bad influence on little kids…sadly i have a 9 year old cousin reading about love and sex

  861. Posted July 25, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    Oh, thank you! I hate this series!

  862. Giselle
    Posted July 26, 2009 at 1:28 am

    “Rodimus Assprmer!” u might be the funniest person in the world! hahaha “basterdize” great word :)

  863. Posted July 26, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    i can say i cant agree because i did enjoy the twilight series…..(newmoon eclipse breakingdawn) but i didnt obsess over it. sometimes a good series will comke around and not everyone will enjoy it but some people do enjoy the twilight series like myself.

  864. Posted July 26, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    i can say i cant agree because i did enjoy the twilight series…..(newmoon eclipse breakingdawn) but i didnt obsess over it. sometimes a good series will comke around and not everyone will enjoy it but some people do enjoy the twilight series like myself.

  865. gustnbones
    Posted July 27, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    Hahaha I agree 100% with this list… Twilight is awful

  866. Elizabeth+Georgia
    Posted July 28, 2009 at 11:55 am

    Can i just ask, How many of you people have actually read the twilight saga?
    Twilight is amazing, completely revolutionary.
    How can you say there is a lack of character developement? Have you not read the complete series? Have you not noticed the changed in edward and bella from twilight to breaking dawn?
    You say it is not a vampire novel, Well you have obviously no time to go on stephanie meyers website. I quote ‘I like to say that Twilight is a vampire novel for people who dont like vampires’ Stephanie says.
    FAIL TO YOU, its become obvious by number 25 that you havent read the series, because it does mention fangs!
    You say that the series is boring, the characters dont develope, but it seems to me that you are the one with boring tastes. You dislike the fact that Meyer breaks most vampire rules, that the have no fangs and sparkle, so seen as you do not like change, u are not open to explore other options.

    21. This book contains no real sex, so it’s not really a vampire novel.
    29. It’s predictable, and childish.
    Actually, i think maybe you are the childish one

    “We read the entire series just to laugh at the stupidity of it”
    How sad, really, you must be sone middle aged balding twit.

    39. They use a drug reference in a book written for ten-year-olds

    Oh yes because 10 year olds would be allowed to read books about vampires and skin being ripped open with vampire teeth, yes i see your point idiot.

    43. Stephen King agrees that Stephanie Meyer can’t write ‘worth a darn’.
    44. It’s stupid.
    45. Bella.
    46. Bella is Edward’s beard.
    47. Meyer wrote four books about nothing, really.
    48. Straight men sparkle?
    I think maybe your getting a little desperate on your points now

    “Do any guys actually like Twilight?”
    Yes, 4 of my male friends have all read twilight. I take it you are a guy, a very ignorant one as it seems.

    54. There’s far too little actual conflict in the story. But this probably stems from having a flawless main character.
    Wow, what a typical male comment.

    55. They fall in love way too quickly and it seems fake because no one falls in love instantly, especially teenagers.
    LMFAO, Bella is drawn to edward, part of the way vampires attract prey, therefore spending more time together, falling in love eventually.

    85. Ms. Meyer writes the way I did when I was twelve years old, doodling in my journal.
    Well maybe is your writing was that good a standard when you were twelve, you should release a book about sad smelling widowers writing on the internet about more fortunate books.

    “Martin Luther would not have not have approved if the book was written during his lifetime.”
    How dare you discrace such a name. How exactly would you know that Martin Luther would have disapproved, did you know him? I think not.

    “The book was so bad we wrote 95 reasons why we hate it”
    Yes, 95 reason that were very repetative, very narrow minded and very immature. Your either sad middle aged men with nothing better to do, or sad teenage boys also with nothing better to do.
    Either way, you are obviously of the male species, and say that all women are now blinded by thinking men will be like edward cullen. Well maybe u shud start to adjust to being more like edward, as i dont see u with girlfriends atm.

    Yes u say that twilight fans are sad and will come and attack this piece, well your right.
    One more thing, FAIL.

  867. seriously people??
    Posted July 29, 2009 at 1:07 am

    Oh yeah and you FAIL at life

  868. Lily
    Posted July 29, 2009 at 4:21 am

    Every single one of those reasons is true. I’ve read all the books but am now ashamed to admit it- I don’t know how I managed to make it through any of them. I would rather drill into my head than read those books again.

  869. Anonymous_Girl
    Posted July 29, 2009 at 4:29 am

    LOL I’m a Twilight fan too but I thought some of ur reasons were very funny and valid:

    “If Bella is so ‘plain’, why do so many guys fall for her within the first two chapters?”

    Agreed. That is such a ‘Bollywood’ thing to do :p All the guys falling for the lead female. It’s an insult to those girls who have never been asked out by a single guy all throughout school and college. For a writer who has received such high acclaim, its disappointing to see such cliche’s in Meyer’s protagonist. Bella could have been different.

    Another Meyer logic I don’t seem to understand is that if anyone can become a vampire by simply being bitten by a vampire, how is it possible that all vampires are, more or less, impeccably beautiful? I mean do the person’s features change once they are a vampire? Or is Meyer suggesting that all human beings are beautiful but their attractive sides are accentuated and made more conspicuous by the transformation?

    “Isn’t it convenient that her father always leaves her alone and doesn’t question her? Real parents aren’t that way.”

    Exactly what I was thinking while reading the books…And the way Charlie implements his discipline is pathetic. Meyer is teaching kids the wrong things by making forbidden love look easy.

    “Bella is a useless, whining, doll that suddenly has become the idol for girls everywhere.”

    I couldn’t STAND her in Eclipse. With all that walking along the beach hand in hand with Jacob. They were always touching! You don’t DO that when you know the kid likes you…and you kinda do to. Things just get out of hand that way. And Edward showed WAY to much patience in Eclipse. Bella doesn’t deserve it. And OH yeh…if Bella’s true love was Edward then why does she whine so much about getting married to him? Dumb dumb dumb

    “People say that Twilight is better than Harry Potter. Guess what? WRONG.”

    Amen, girl!

    “You don’t have to describe the character every two pages, we know all about Edward’s ‘perfectly toned chest’ the fourth time she mentions it.”

    Lol exactly. She has to make the books longer one way or another. So she chose to throw in unnecessary to catalyse that process.

    “Her vampires sparkle. Enough said.”

    LMAO. I was so disspointed when I read that. I liked it the traditional way.

    “There is too much face touching”

    “Stephanie Meyer creates some interesting characters ie: Jasper and Alice. She then ignores them, and gives them no development”

    She focuses too much on Bella. And because everybody is so perfect to begin with she doesn’t improve them.

    “Do any guys actually like Twilight?”

    NO. I don’t see why they would. And I prefer it this way.

    “It’s offensive to the entire human race, both male and female.”

    Mhmm. Too much power and importance given to the male. And the whole beautiful thing.

    I kind of don’t agree with your evaluation of Jacob though. Jacob was supposed to be mature for his age. But he practically pounced at every opportunity he got to snog Bella…You may argue that Bella DID kind of lead him on but still, we can’t excuse him for not failing to exercise his self-discipline on so many occasions.

    Also, why ruin such a great piece of criticism with remarks like these?:

    # It’s stupid.
    # Bella.
    # Bella is Edward’s beard.
    # Meyer wrote four books about nothing, really.

    Bella is Edward’s beard? :P I hope you wrote that just to be funny. Coz that’s all it was.

    “Being clumsy is not a flaw if Edward always catches her.”

    That made no sense. :)

  870. Alison
    Posted July 29, 2009 at 4:36 am

    To Elizabeth and Georgia… Twilight is not revolutionary. It didn’t do anything new or change anything. It’s just about the same collection of ideas written by somebody with the grammer capabilities of a 12 year old.

    Bella is still the same whiny girl she was in Twilight as she is in Breaking Dawn. I don’t see any character development there.

    By the way, quoting Stephanie Myer doesn’t give you any credibility. Just because she says its a vampire novel for people who don’t like vampires doesn’t mean it is. In fact I’d say it’s a novel for people who don’t read good vampire novels.

    Also, the book is read by ten-year olds. I’d say that’s where the bulk of the fans come from, I guess they can relate to the writing style.

  871. Anonymous_Girl
    Posted July 29, 2009 at 4:47 am

    Oh yes another addition is that if vampires are genetic dead-ends then how did Bella fall pregnant? Bella’s pregnancy means Edward’s reproductive organs are still active, but the female vampires’ organs aren’t. Sexist much? If half-vampires can exist then so should full-vampire offspring. According to Carlisle vampires have 25 chromosomes so technically they arent so genetically dead are they?

    This is why the Twilight saga is so predictable. Because there is no logic behind the things that happen! And although Harry Potter seems even more bizarre, its story-line is heaps more layered, intricate and complex than Twilight’s. And hence its popular amongst a much wider audience.

  872. JessiKa xoxo
    Posted July 29, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    Why would someone write somthing like this? How does poops and giggles work for you? Thats all it was for me. (excluding the poops) I enjoyed reading this, it was very funny.

  873. trish
    Posted July 29, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    shut the hell up all of use, why would u make a thing saying how much u hate twilight? if u know all of the things about the saga then u have read it have to of liked it to keep going,, geezz get a life all of youh,,,,,,,,,

  874. peach_peachy
    Posted July 30, 2009 at 6:18 am

    “Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.” LOOOOOOOOOOOL!!! that was awsome

  875. jESSICAAA
    Posted July 30, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    I laughed so fcking hard at this. Its very true, but al the comments about “This isnt what a real vampire does’ How would you know what a vampire really is? Everything is all make belive. You shouldnt really insult someones imagination, no amtter how stupid it is, and aty least somme people liked it, But all the other points were RIGHT on lmao.

  876. sweeti
    Posted July 31, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    I really liked this, I am kind of enjoying the book though, I am 15 and I agree on all of your points, I am reading it so I can compare the book and the movie(which I HATED by the way). My friend has a saying- \”why would you go to high school, then come home and read about high school?\” I couldn\’t agree more! I go to school, I live the drama, I don\’t want to read a book about the drama i basically just lived, it doesn\’t make sense.
    THANK YOU for making it clear that people are entitled to their own opinions, it seems that Twilight lovers don\’t realize that, I can\’t so much as say I hate one sentence in that book without getting chewed out by my sister or friends because it\’s \”mean\”
    my friend said this on facebook because she took offense to a post I posted:
    \”i dont like twilight haters! get over it people! people like different things and always will so leave us be!\”
    I never said she couldn\’t like it, I don\’t undersand how this is defending her though…

  877. sweeti
    Posted July 31, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    and just because you read the book doesn’t mean you had to like it just ’cause you finished the series…

  878. Megan
    Posted August 1, 2009 at 12:59 am

    I’m one of the people who enjoyed the series but I’m not obsessed with it. I agree and disagree with some points listed above; however #61-63 are ridiculous. No one acquires vampire powers from reading a book. No one should be that obsessed and no, Edward Cullen does not exist. Jacob Black is NOT a real person and they’ll never be real. Jacob can and never will imprint on you and Edward will never come for you cause they don’t exist. So girls, get over yourself and face the reality that fictional characters don’t just jump out of books and decide to be your boyfriend. If Harry Potter, Ron Weasley, Draco Malfoy, and the Weasley twins can’t do it, neither can Mr. Sparkles.

  879. Megan
    Posted August 1, 2009 at 1:04 am

    Oh and Dear Elizabeth Georgia, get a life and stop defending a book. You need to see a therapist.

  880. whats the big deal with this thing?
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    its funny how ppl think that vampires are real.

    the idea of this book is so copy writed.

    why are the books called what they are?
    i never read them. and i wont either

    girls were bascially presured into reading the book because all their friends did and they said it was ‘amazing’ so they read it also and thought well everyone likes these there pretty good…

    yea

  881. Ann
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    Hehe. It’s so funny to read all these reviews! Dude, it’s just a book!

  882. Yuki
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    u.u sure it’s just a book…a horrible book that made a tons of money of girls who either had bad romances or never had a real one.

    O.o oh yes this book approved of necrophilia…and the ability to make babies with them.

    In short the series proved that fan-fiction can make tons of money if you targeted young females. With hybrid sparkling vampires with no significant flaw like “sunlight” except the thirst. Also it pushed back Harry Potter from coming out, because they rather not have a good book and good movie to be destroyed by an influx of pathetic swooning teenagers.

  883. Posted August 2, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    personally, i LOVE the books. and if you don’t like them, don’t read them…it’s not that hard to figure out! god damn it. i wish that people would stop finding all of the “flaws” in these books and just focus on the good parts. you people obviously have nothing better to do with your time any way…so read something else!

  884. Emma
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    ok. i like the books, but yeah sure there are some flaws. but there are far worse books that i have read…i didn’t go off and bitch about them on the internet however. so stop slamming the books! they are actually pretty good. plus lots of people really like them and you could be offending those “twilight fans”. some of your points aren’t very accurate either. :)

  885. everybody calm down!!!
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 9:07 pm

    i am not a big fan, but i liked the books. slamming them won’t help. they are too big of a success. i am not obsessed like many other girls and agree and disagree on some points in your list. i think that everyone is entitled to there own opinion, but it is just a book and i think that everyone needs to chill. :)

  886. Unkown
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    In many respects Edward and Bella’s relationship have reminded me of Mr Rochester and Jane Eyre’s. What do you think?

  887. Catherine
    Posted August 3, 2009 at 6:28 am

    LOL i forgot to add TAKE THAT RABID TWILIGHT FANGIRLS! i bet you that’s how we are all going to die one day

  888. Posted August 3, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    this is SOO true, i would have liked this trashy novel if you pathetic twilight fans would have put it to rest after reading it. seriously, people go so crazy over some old ,dead, pale, glittering guy whose NOT even REAL. threatening to so-called BEHEAD you for not liking this. Get a life, now your life revolves around some crappy book series that is a digrace to the human race. Some annoying 7th grader said i was a taylor laughtner(whatev) hater. UHMM, eww, that busted dude, no. how many of you twilight haters have been verbally attacked for saying what is true about the book? Please, answer.
    In conclusion, edward, bella, and jacob aren’t real. GET OVER IT!!!!
    all the characters look like shyt.
    Epic fail.
    What kind of guy glitters? Not a real vamp.
    kristen stewart smoked pot, ILLEGAL, if not i don’t care.
    and don’t let those twilight fans dragg you in with them, you’ll just be brainless.
    And for those people who say all girls love twilight,
    THINK AGAIN!!
    cuz i sure the hell don’t!!

  889. Posted August 3, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    The books suck. I really, REALLY hated the first one. There was no plot whatsoever and it drove me crazy. But after hearing from friends that it “gets better”, I’m giving the second one a shot. It IS better and go figure, Edward isn’t in this one. I despise Edward’s character. He is horribly boring. Jacob has more personality. Still, I read it quickly because I only skim through when Bella is by herself. She never has any interesting or insightful thoughts whatsoever.

    I’ve compared reading this book to watching a sitcom. It’s dead literature, comparable to mind-numbing television.

  890. Posted August 3, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    entirely agree

  891. Denise
    Posted August 3, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    Amen.

    Love,
    Denise

    P.S. The movie sucked too.

  892. Chulupa
    Posted August 3, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    Yes, yes and yes! Your rules are dead on. Twilight sucks and I’m soooo sick of it. We need a cure.

  893. Bizzy
    Posted August 3, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    yes, meyer took a story line that has been used many times, but she made it better than ever and i really don’t care what you think because my edward is coming to get me someday even if you don’t believe me!!! TWILIGHT ROCKS!!! AND SO DOES STEPHENIE MEYER!!!

  894. bizzy
    Posted August 3, 2009 at 11:20 pm

    oh and Elizabeth Goergia, your opinion was the best one here i read it all and loved it and i so agree with you (they are either teenage boys or middle aged men with nothing to do) lol i love you!!!

  895. C-Zoo
    Posted August 4, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    Kudos to you. I hate Twilight. Edward is sparkly and hot, Bella is a complete arse b*tch. >_>

  896. Eliz.
    Posted August 4, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    hahaha, so true.
    I hate the Twilight series…reading the first book made me want to barf.
    I was always contradicted by the fact Edward can’t read Bell’s mind. But he can read everyone else’s. I love your solution.

  897. Oh ye Gods
    Posted August 4, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    You have my respect for doing this.
    Let’s just hope that there won’t be any creepy fangirl who starts stalking you and nibbling you.

    That’s pretty much all the fangirls, anyways.

  898. Posted August 5, 2009 at 5:05 am

    TWILIGHT IS FUGLY.
    the truth is that Stephenie Meyer copied the ideas of L.J. Smith who wrote “Vampire Diaries” which was made 14 YEARS before TWILIGHT. She’s disgraced Anne Rice and all the other vampire authors, plus EDWARD CULLEN is a fictional SUPERHUMAN MORON, girls, so get a LIFE! I’m still a teenager and I’ve read Twilight, and to be honest I wrote like that when I was 09. OMG.

  899. Kren
    Posted August 5, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    Wow. Lots of venom here. I think Bella was an airhead, but come on, guys, it wasn’t that bad. And at least we got some awesome music out of the movie (ie; Supermassive Black Hole, which I am listening to right this very second)

  900. boom mc tavish
    Posted August 5, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    Reading Twilight was one of the most infuriating experiences of my life.

    The book is cliched, repetative and banal. I couldn’t finish it. And i tried, really tried but i just couldn’t. Just awful. I didn’t think there was worse writing that Da Vinci Code but Twilight is so much worse.

    Worst of all it glorifies the “weak woman rescued from herself by knight in shinning armour” scenario that makes women victims of life rather than the incredible resourcful powerful beings they actually are.

    And just for the record, speaking as a male of the species, i HATED Bella. That whiny self doubt of hers has every quality men avoid! Run from actually. Men want women to love not babysit!

    Twilight is bad writing with great marketing….and that is an evil combination.

    Thanks for the list….

    Boom Mc Tavish

  901. HATETWILIGHT
    Posted August 6, 2009 at 1:30 am

    I TOTALLY AGREE
    ALL THESE PEOPLE TRIPPIN OVER WHAT
    ITS A TERRIBLE MOVIE WITH BAD ACTORS WHO ACT LIKE THEY DONT CARE
    I HATE THE PLOT
    STORY
    TSHIRTS
    TEAMS
    APPLES
    AND THE OPINION OF NOT COMBING HAIR
    PLEASE BUY A HAIR BRUSH
    FOR THE LOVE OF GOOD MOVIES

  902. allie
    Posted August 6, 2009 at 7:43 am

    I have to say that i am a twilight fan but some of your comment are really good. i did not know that bella swan meant beautiful swan = CHEESE i am sorry but it is sorry for all the few twilight fan i am also a HP fan and it is a LOT deeper then twilight the fast falling in love thing is really cheesy and the whole i would die for you over and over and over again is a waste of pages i love it but you are right on some of the piont and yes i am not an addict so i dont have tshirts teams or name my children after a character!!!!! <—- all that is creepy!! xxx

  903. funny stufffff.
    Posted August 6, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    LOL this is hilarious. I use to be a twilight fan, until my best friend starting liking it. She thinks the vampires are real and that she “has” Jasper Hale. It drives me crazy! I still think its an okay book, but it isnt worth obsessing like most people do. I don’t base my life around twilight. I could care less about it now.
    This post made my day :D

  904. Posted August 6, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    Gosh, that was frickin’ hilarious!
    Although I actually don’t mind Twilight that much, it doesn’t deserve the crazy attention it’s getting because it’s pretty stupid.

  905. Sarah
    Posted August 6, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    If you had read the book and understood them you wouldn’t have made such invalid points …

    ie Bella isnt plain, thats the way SHE sees herself (clearly you have not read the books)

    ie Edward does have faults – (again, clearly you have not read the books)

    i could challenge you on many of these but its not worth it, its just your opinion and sorry, but it dosent count for much …

    Its little wonder people are too shy to try and get published, with people like you waiting to pounce on them. Perhaps you might like to try not being so judgemental and rude.

  906. Mirabel
    Posted August 7, 2009 at 2:14 am

    this list is laughable…if you dont like Twilight then fine. So what…

    there are always extreme and crazy fans out there, but not all Twilight Fans are 12 and think vampires are real.

    Go and find something to do that is worth your while instead of behaving like 2 year olds.

    I doubt very much that you could ever write anything worthy of publishing. Because you are obviously unable to understand the books.

    Spite and jealousy are your motivations. I feel sorry for you.

    Stephenie Meyer followed her dreams. Good for her.

  907. sarah
    Posted August 7, 2009 at 2:17 am

    im laughing at stephen kings comments – his books are dead boring !

    All of his books are soo predictable.

    what a tool

  908. Jasmine
    Posted August 7, 2009 at 2:31 am

    these people who wrote this list are only trying to antagonise twilight fans,, your reactions (as above) are only giving them what they want …

    which shows what sad people they are…

  909. Sara
    Posted August 7, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    I really feel sorry that someone squashed your imagination so much. Dont get me wrong, I would chose HP over Twilight if a gun were to my head, but a 46 year old man trying to kill a 1 year old baby is more realistic than two teenagers falling in love at first sight? All teenager think its love at first sight. Im feel really bad that someone hurt you so badly that you have to attack things that are different. And just clear up some facts, it wasn’t written for 10 year olds, and there is not real sex because she’s mormon and they don’t discuss that stuff.

  910. brenda gomez
    Posted August 9, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    Twilight is so stupid! There is really no point to it!
    I just thikn that twilight and the rest of the seires are just sexual pick me ups for little teenage girls.
    for god’s sake read a reall vampire book that makes sense!
    like the Anne Rice novels.

  911. EX-twihard
    Posted August 10, 2009 at 1:26 am

    bhahaaaa i loved this!
    its soo freakig true in every way.
    my brother who is all time lover of Stephen King and Anne Rice books would soo agree.he couldn\’t believe i was such a major twihard.im sooooo glad im not anymore.i sold my twilight shirt at my aunt\’s garage sale for $1,drew on my twilight poster, and im gonna burn my twilight books :)

    its true how teenager girls are blinded by there love of edward they can\’t realize that the book is CRAP!!! I was one of them.Im not afraid to admit it beacuase i can tell off any and every twiligh fan.

    HARRY POTTER IS SOOOO MUCH BETTER!! :)

  912. Tianna
    Posted August 10, 2009 at 6:09 am

    Okay, you know what?
    I’m just going to leave it like this:
    Twilight Sucks. The End.

    No elaboration needed, those four words just says it all.

    And for you die hard fans, I’ve read the series. Yes, all four books. And I hated them.

  913. Anonymous
    Posted August 10, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    I whole-heartedly agree with this list! I used to like Twilight, but after Breaking Dawn and the movie, I hated it.

  914. george
    Posted August 10, 2009 at 11:11 pm

    yeah, twilight has definitely corrupted people’s minds and should just not exist… i’m pretty sure there is no such thing as vampires. and #41 is so true, i couldn’t go to photobucket or bumpersticker, or even google images without finding something having to do with twilight in the most recent searches it’s ridiculous, stupid and unnecessary… the end.

  915. Michele
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 5:46 am

    So true! I’m a teenage girl and I HATE Twilight. It’s relieving to know that other rational people are still out there.

  916. michael
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    I think hes just mad that he doesnt have a gf that loves him. Think about it he has all this time to read the books and find every flaw must have alot of time on his hands. And plus I dont like the way you talk about women. GET A LIFE.

  917. michael
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    another thing most of the points u listed r invalid
    and u repeated some of your points at least ten times we get it u think Edwards “HOT” why dont u go marry him?

  918. michael
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    um i agree with elizibith+gergia but i dont agree with her on some points like atacking the male speicies but i do agree with the other FACTS like them being ignorant s.o.bs

  919. Posted August 11, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    I read twilight because my friends told me it was ‘amazing’. Yeah, I fell for it. Sue me. The first book was lame but for some reason I bought all four books (I want my money back!) and read them all more than once. I went to see the movie and thought it was sappy and unrealistic. Shortly after that I came to my senses. Twilight sucks, Harry Potter will always be the best. The end.
    Also, Amen to this list. Especially: “The reason Edward can’t read Bella’s mind is because she doesn’t have one.” LOL
    I was team Jacob from the start, because I hate Edward ’cause he’s a piece of bull crap.
    Sorry to all you fans, go ahead and love it if you want, and don’t get me wrong: I have a very good friend who is a Twilight addict, and I support that. I just don’t think Meyer’s portrayal of some real issues are very accurate, and are quite insulting, such as her views on teenage pregancy, suicide, and parental concern.
    Ok, I’m done now. :D

  920. Anonymous
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 8:34 pm

    I personally dislike Twilight, and I’m not even sure why, lol.
    But, I guess I can see how it appeals to certain people.
    But, whatever.
    I loved your list!!
    Lol.
    :)

  921. liz
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    i SO agree! twilight is a bunch of crap!! it’s all a bunch of lies about vampires. they have been created from a pshyco who drank blood, seduced women, was afraid of the sun, believed he would die from garlic, and was nicknamed dracula. vampires sparkeling in the sun is just stupid! and all those fans who said all that, YOU JUST THREATENED TO KILL OVER THE WEB! last time i checked, that’s illegal. it’s a stupid book and movie. get over it!

  922. Rebecca
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    Haha… Twilight. Oh, Twilight. I used to like Twilight… Yes, I thought the first book was very good. But then I went on to the second book… Then the third. I was a freshman in college and it took me three months to finish the fourth one.

    It was terrible, albeit the torture I went through was my own fault. When I liked this book, I was on Team Jacob, haha. I never liked Edward, not one bit. In fact, I hated Bella. But I was ever aware that these were fictional people.

    Currently, I’m obsessed with hating Twilight. It really has no conflict, which bothered me… And I always wondered why this completely average, clumsy girl was so popular with everyone in this small town. If she was so ugly – as she thinks – why were all the guys all over her?

    *Sigh* I don’t hate Twilight just to hate it. I hate it with reasons. And I laughed so hard when I stumbled upon this. You see, my best friend also hates Twilight, and her name is Sarah. My name’s Rebecca… So, that has nothing to do with anything, but it was funny anyway.

    From this book, I have decided – because I’m writing my own book. Four hundred and fifty pages and counting! – that my characters have to be more real… Oh, yeah. It’s about vampires and werewolves, but not vampires vs. werewolves. It’s an original idea, but I bet everyone will say that I’m copying off of Stephenie Meyer… Even though I started writing it two years before I read Twilight…

    I actually have this shirt that says: “Proud Twilight Hater” on the front and “Real Vampires Don’t Sparkle… They Burn” on the back. Then there’s a black sheep on the left sleeve. ‘Cause, you know, I’m the black sheep in the bunch of raving Twilight fans…

    By the by… Robert Pattinson is very unattractive. And I actually liked Kristen Stewart before she became Bella. She was really good in The Messengers.

    But anyway… I guess I’m slightly obsessive with hating Twilight, but at least it gives me the drive to write my book. So I have to thank that horrible piece of fiction for that much! ^^ Huzzah.

  923. lalala
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    This list was great! I loved it. I’ve read all four books, and I did like them for the most part, but when the movie came out, which, btw, was HORRIBLE, I really hated the first book. I’m not even going to waste my money to see the other movies because they’re just really bad. I also hate all the attention these books are getting. People are so obsessed, and it’s sick.

  924. Kate
    Posted August 13, 2009 at 2:22 am

    #64 is my favorite, because it is so true! Why can’t the Twilight fans spell? They’re grammar is almost as bad as Stephenie Meyer’s lack of vocabulary.

  925. Posted August 13, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    i agree that book sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the grl who plays bella in the movie is hot though……..

  926. jada
    Posted August 13, 2009 at 8:22 pm

    u know i think it is ridicoulous that girls are in love with edward cullen when hello? he is not real. your right it is pathetic & wierd. but i enjoyed the books but didn’t go into a frenzy about them. the movie sucked badly(:

  927. Jay
    Posted August 14, 2009 at 12:21 am

    Lol I loved this!!! It’s so true and funny. 5 stars definitely. The twilight series was one of the worst teenage book series ever written.

  928. Alexa
    Posted August 14, 2009 at 1:08 am

    I hate how everyone got sucked into this Twilight fad. First of all, Twilight wasn’t orginally meant for young adults. It was meant for adults, and was supposed to have more sex in it. However, it became popular with the younger generation, so Meyer gayed it up.

    Second, I’ve heard so much, “I didn’t like to read until I read Twilight!” Wtf? Seriously? Go to a freaking library and get a book with some substance. If Twilight is the most amazing book you’ve ever read, you seriously need to get a brain.

    Twilight vs Harry Potter:
    That Edward Cullen guy was in Harry Potter. He’s the one who died in the Goblet of Fire. But Harry Potter wins, hands down.

    And Twilight fans, don’t get offended that MANY people hate Twilight. We don’t hate you just because you have horrible taste in reading material.

    Haha, I’ve never even read Twilight :)

  929. isabella black
    Posted August 14, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    Please people call down.The person responsible for this list is a f*ck*ng idiot.If you didn’t like Twilight,then why did you take the time to make the stupid list?I admit they were funny,but they were ridiculous.I mean some guys like Twilight,and for some people to say that vampires don’t sparkle,well they don’t but would you like to hear the same thing about vampires,that this and this and so and so.Meyer was only trying to write something else than the same boring stuff.And all of you Harry Potter fans are just freaking jealous because people are moving on with other things rather than staying with same old same old,but good news for you,the same thing will happen to Twilight,not right now,but maybe in a few years.And let people be happy with reading Twilight,in what way does it affect you?huh?You can’t tell someone what to read or what not to read.You’re not their mother.LEAVE THEM ALONE!!!!!!!!One day they’ll get tired of it and moved on,the same as Harry Potter.If you don’t like the book,then forget about it.If you think about it that means you like it,evn if you say no way jose.And in the comment above me,what does Michael Jackson has to do with any if this feud???????
    P.S TWILIGHT ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  930. Kendall
    Posted August 14, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    When i saw action figures, bios of the actors and why they are their roles books, misc books about the movie, and borders and hot topic looked like twilight threw up all over my favorite stores..

    THAT was when it crossed the line.

    Also the fact i couldn’t stop staring at bella’s gaping mouth like she was mentally retarded but then again.. bella is mentally retarded.

  931. Meg
    Posted August 14, 2009 at 10:03 pm

    Ugh you people are so freaking clueless. I will make a point that everything you said is wrong.

    1. Bella is not a perfect character I don’t think this Mary Sue person fell in love with a freakin vampire who is 17 forever and sparkles in the sun. Plus the perfect normal character would not have a bestfriend who is a werewolf.

    2. Edward dosen’t always catch her thats why she gets hurt so much in the book(Read the book before you talk bad) and still its a flaw anyway.

    3. Uhh Bella spends like 9 months with out Edward. God you people are stupid.

    4. Bella does not try to committ suicide she was cliffdiving and Jacob was going to go with her but he had some wolf stuff to do.

    5. Stephanie Meyer does not live in Forks, she is not 17, she dosen’t have a vampire boyfriend, she is not a vampire either.

    6. If it is written so badly was is it the New York Times Bestseller, and why has it sold 17 million copies?

    7. The rules aren’t broken. The vampires are still undead, pale, beautiful,strong, and venomous.

    8. Stephanie Meyer made up her own rules, she dosen’t have to follow the others examples.

    9. I’m in love with Edward but I’m more in love with my boyfriend Evan.

    10. How are life threatening sicimstances boring? You have got major brain damage

    11. EDWARD DOES HAVE FLAWS HE’S A KILLER! And he’s overprotective and too catious.

    12. Bella does have a personality. She is grown up for her age, respponsible, funny, sarcastic, lovable, strange,and so much more.

    13. Bella has 0 confidence, she really is pretty she just thinks she’s not.

    14. Edwards a vampire, and um by the way Bella does NOT let Edward control her.

    15. Charlie Bella’s dad does watch her behavior, he HATES Edward and one time he grounded Bella because she was going to vivsit her MOM with Edward.

    16. You probley only read the first page of Twilight, how do you know how if Bella is Developed or not? same with Rosalie Emmett and Jasper they don’t get to tell thier stories until Eclipse.

    17. How is Bella whiny? I mean if you had a cychotic vampire chasing after you, you would be pretty whiny.

    18. Oh yeah cuz geeky flying wizards are all the rage.

    19. Edwards not abusive. If he was Bella would be dead already. And how can Edward be boring he’s a vampire.

    20. How is a love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town called Forks “cliché”.

    21. Uhh HELLO this is a young adult novel not some dirty sex book.

    I could go on allll day but I don’t feel like typing anymore. Anyway I bet you just watched the movie and read like one pge of the book.

  932. Say and Em
    Posted August 15, 2009 at 3:45 am

    “I solemnly swear that I am up to no good.”

    To Meg:

    Thank you for proving all of the above points, like the horrible grammar in the like.

    Bella is a flat character, which is extremely bad for a main focus of several novels. The characteristics are too stereotypical to count for a personality. It’s like Ms. Meyer went down a teenager checklist of traits. The Mary Sue reference has nothing to do with who she interacts with, so you’re missing the point. Mary Sue is implying that Bella is too static of a character: unchanging and predictable. There are no conflicting traits and she has a very flexible set of morals.

    Bella only gets seriously injured once and that’s because Edward isn’t there to save her. Her injuries aren’t even the her own fault.

    In the nine months without Edward, she is still completely focused upon him. You’re correct that she does not attempt suicide, but she seems extremely depressed and she takes extreme risks which could easily lead to death, so it appears that it crossed her mind at least once. She heard Edward’s voice every time she did something stupid anyway, which just proves my point: dependent and creepy.

    Yes, we know Stephanie Meyer is not a teenager with a vampire boyfriend, but that’s not the point. Again, you’re off the mark. She is basing the characters and plot so much off her fantasies that in effect Bella is a fictional representation of the author to the point where it’s concerning. When the actor that plays Edward Cullen thinks that the books are a written down version of Meyer’s sexual fantasies you know there’s a problem.

    First of all, to become a New York Bestseller you have to sell a lot of copies, so your pieces of evidence are completely redundant. Also, as stated above, the major fans of this book, primarily preteen to teenage girls, are completely obsessed with the attractiveness of Edward Cullen. Sex sells, as they say. I’ve actually heard stories of men getting dumped because their girlfriends want to find Edward. That, if anything, further proves the point of this book being focused around Meyer’s fantasies. I’m happy you have a boyfriend that you care about, but you’re the exception not the rule.

    Life threatening circumstances can be put into any situation with words. They do not make a story interesting. There are life threatening situations discussed in medical journals, but I doubt that, unless you’re a medical student, you find them interesting. The application of a commonly used plot scenario does not make a good book.

    As previously presented, the fact that Edward is indeed a vampire and thus a killer is a plot point, not a flaw. If he wasn’t a vampire there would even less of a story. The other traits, overt caution and over protectiveness, are a result of being a vampire and a killer. Though they could be considered flaws, these are static flaws. They are stereotypical and thus do not count.

    The listed characteristics that make Bella’s assumed personality are again very stereotypical. Sarcasm is practically a necessity of being a teenager. Bella’s slight ability to be funny is directly tied to her sarcastic nature. Even so, she seems extremely deadpan and thus has no real sense of humor. Responsibility and maturity are almost identical and thus redundant. Strange and lovable are extremely variable and depend on your perception of normalcy. The very fact that there is a vampire involved in this story means that the characters will have a strangeness because it alters the variables and thus the reaction. Also, having low confidence is a common characteristic of being a teenager and does not constitute a personality. Meyer doesn’t even give her a distinct attractive characteristic, deciding to keep her very plain. It’s sticking with the typical, overused forbidden love story.

    She really has no independence from Edward. She needs him for everything. When he leaves her in the second book, she is so devastated that her father, who rarely makes a real appearance involving her personal feelings, asks her if she’s okay and if she can initiate her social life without him. She is sulking in the house for months. Oh, and thank you for stating the extremely obvious fact that Edward is indeed a vampire. I think we know.

    Fathers always hate boyfriends, especially in the beginning. This does not constitute a father that’s in tune with his daughter or a father that questions what her daughter is doing. He doesn’t express any real concern until she’s wallowing in the house all day, something that’s hard to miss. He is completely oblivious to her emotions and her struggles.

    Bella’s past and personality are never developed beyond the bare basics in all four of the novels. She’s flat, unchanging, and with no true uniqueness. There is no real connection with her family and her life before Edward. The story is so focused on their relationship that it loses all of it’s realism to the reader. We know vampires and werewolves aren’t real, but the characters should feel realistic. Rosalie and Emmett are barely touched upon in the later books. The stories are told, but not explored. Jasper is also left undeveloped, though not as much as Rosalie and Emmett. If you are going to make a major character, they have to have more of a purpose and more of a life then what is imperative to the plot. Otherwise, they seem pointless or the lack of information becomes a major distraction.

    I don’t know if I should respond to this one because you just completely contradicted yourself about Bella’s whining. You ask how she can be considered whiny, and then justify and explain why she’s whiny. Make up your mind. Yes, I admit that being stalked by a vampire that actually intends to kill would put a slight damper on my day, but she becomes obnoxious to the point where it irritates the reader, not her fellow characters. If your main character is supposed to be who we’re rooting for, then she shouldn’t be constantly obnoxious and childish. Note that this contradicts her supposed maturity. If her whiny behavior dominates the book’s conversation, then she’s not mature.

    First, they said border-line abusive. Second, not all abuse is physical. Edward emotionally and mentally abuses Bella. This is related to her complete reliance on him. His over protective nature resulting from his vampire blood teaches Bella not to trust in herself, but to trust in him instead. This a major form of emotional abuse and can cripple a person’s confidence and independence.

    A love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town is cliché because it’s a love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town. It’s a very basic, predictable twist on forbidden love and blood feuds. Think Romeo and Juliet, but much worse. The little town scenario is so overused it has been rendered completely meaningless. These novels are just generic copies of old plot lines.

    If this is a young adult novel, then why does it resemble a sexual fantasy almost to the letter. My thirteen-year-old sister, who is helping me write this, caught a great deal of sexual references and adult themes without my assistance. The books make people, including Robert Pattinson, uncomfortable. It’s actually completely inappropriate for young adults as it seems to sponsor creeping into a girl’s room and watching her sleep, emotional abuse, pedophilia, and other behaviors that are generally frowned upon. As this is quite apparently Meyer’s sexual fantasy, these young adults become overwhelmed by the raw emotion of a lust driven story, especially seeing that there is no true connection beyond physical characteristics between Bella and Edward that is mentioned. Young adults, for whom these novels are supposedly written, are still exploring their notions of the world. Not only does this imply that looks are everything in a relationship, but citing lust as the cornerstone of a “true love” relationship is so damaging to the true meaning of love that it causes these girls to become completely obsessed with Edward because, as he is fictional, he would be their only chance at what is implied to be true love in the novels.

    We had to save this one for the end. “Geeky flying wizards” have been far more popular for far longer. These books have complicated plot lines and three dimensional characters. The people feel real, despite the wizardry aspect. In comparison Twilight is so simplistic that it provides no real mental stimulus. Harry Potter books appeal to a much wider age range, which helps to explain why they can take the time to make an excellent movie without worrying about losing the interest of the screaming preteen girls that Twilight needs to survive.

    Lastly, we took the time to respond to your post because, not only do we blatantly disagree with you, but you seem to miss the point of opinions and literary criticism. You seem so proud that you’ve read the books, yet you demonstrate no understanding of the beauty of what literature actually is. Literature is based on opinions. You are welcome to yours and I am allowed mine. It is what makes literature fascinating. However, lashing out in disagreement without backing up an argument just hurts your cause. It makes you seem defensive, fueling the idea that the person you are arguing against is, in fact, correct. Literary criticism should be based on what’s in the story as well as opinions.

    We hope that you will use our comments to improve your debate. The goal is not to change opinions but explore and better explain them.

    Sincerely yours,
    Say and Em

    “I open at the close.”

    P.S. Learn to spell. Psychotic. Yes, there are silent letters but we learn those in the third grade. Circumstances. At least I think that’s what you meant. Responsible. Please proof read if you want to be taken seriously.

    “Mischief managed.”

  933. Say and Em
    Posted August 15, 2009 at 3:46 am

    \”I solemnly swear that I am up to no good.\”

    To Meg:

    Thank you for proving all of the above points, like the horrible grammar in the like.

    Bella is a flat character, which is extremely bad for a main focus of several novels. The characteristics are too stereotypical to count for a personality. It\’s like Ms. Meyer went down a teenager checklist of traits. The Mary Sue reference has nothing to do with who she interacts with, so you\’re missing the point. Mary Sue is implying that Bella is too static of a character: unchanging and predictable. There are no conflicting traits and she has a very flexible set of morals.

    Bella only gets seriously injured once and that\’s because Edward isn\’t there to save her. Her injuries aren\’t even the her own fault.

    In the nine months without Edward, she is still completely focused upon him. You\’re correct that she does not attempt suicide, but she seems extremely depressed and she takes extreme risks which could easily lead to death, so it appears that it crossed her mind at least once. She heard Edward\’s voice every time she did something stupid anyway, which just proves my point: dependent and creepy.

    Yes, we know Stephanie Meyer is not a teenager with a vampire boyfriend, but that\’s not the point. Again, you\’re off the mark. She is basing the characters and plot so much off her fantasies that in effect Bella is a fictional representation of the author to the point where it\’s concerning. When the actor that plays Edward Cullen thinks that the books are a written down version of Meyer\’s sexual fantasies you know there\’s a problem.

    First of all, to become a New York Bestseller you have to sell a lot of copies, so your pieces of evidence are completely redundant. Also, as stated above, the major fans of this book, primarily preteen to teenage girls, are completely obsessed with the attractiveness of Edward Cullen. Sex sells, as they say. I\’ve actually heard stories of men getting dumped because their girlfriends want to find Edward. That, if anything, further proves the point of this book being focused around Meyer\’s fantasies. I\’m happy you have a boyfriend that you care about, but you\’re the exception not the rule.

    Life threatening circumstances can be put into any situation with words. They do not make a story interesting. There are life threatening situations discussed in medical journals, but I doubt that, unless you\’re a medical student, you find them interesting. The application of a commonly used plot scenario does not make a good book.

    As previously presented, the fact that Edward is indeed a vampire and thus a killer is a plot point, not a flaw. If he wasn\’t a vampire there would even less of a story. The other traits, overt caution and over protectiveness, are a result of being a vampire and a killer. Though they could be considered flaws, these are static flaws. They are stereotypical and thus do not count.

    The listed characteristics that make Bella\’s assumed personality are again very stereotypical. Sarcasm is practically a necessity of being a teenager. Bella\’s slight ability to be funny is directly tied to her sarcastic nature. Even so, she seems extremely deadpan and thus has no real sense of humor. Responsibility and maturity are almost identical and thus redundant. Strange and lovable are extremely variable and depend on your perception of normalcy. The very fact that there is a vampire involved in this story means that the characters will have a strangeness because it alters the variables and thus the reaction. Also, having low confidence is a common characteristic of being a teenager and does not constitute a personality. Meyer doesn\’t even give her a distinct attractive characteristic, deciding to keep her very plain. It\’s sticking with the typical, overused forbidden love story.

    She really has no independence from Edward. She needs him for everything. When he leaves her in the second book, she is so devastated that her father, who rarely makes a real appearance involving her personal feelings, asks her if she\’s okay and if she can initiate her social life without him. She is sulking in the house for months. Oh, and thank you for stating the extremely obvious fact that Edward is indeed a vampire. I think we know.

    Fathers always hate boyfriends, especially in the beginning. This does not constitute a father that\’s in tune with his daughter or a father that questions what her daughter is doing. He doesn\’t express any real concern until she\’s wallowing in the house all day, something that\’s hard to miss. He is completely oblivious to her emotions and her struggles.

    Bella\’s past and personality are never developed beyond the bare basics in all four of the novels. She\’s flat, unchanging, and with no true uniqueness. There is no real connection with her family and her life before Edward. The story is so focused on their relationship that it loses all of it\’s realism to the reader. We know vampires and werewolves aren\’t real, but the characters should feel realistic. Rosalie and Emmett are barely touched upon in the later books. The stories are told, but not explored. Jasper is also left undeveloped, though not as much as Rosalie and Emmett. If you are going to make a major character, they have to have more of a purpose and more of a life then what is imperative to the plot. Otherwise, they seem pointless or the lack of information becomes a major distraction.

    I don\’t know if I should respond to this one because you just completely contradicted yourself about Bella\’s whining. You ask how she can be considered whiny, and then justify and explain why she\’s whiny. Make up your mind. Yes, I admit that being stalked by a vampire that actually intends to kill would put a slight damper on my day, but she becomes obnoxious to the point where it irritates the reader, not her fellow characters. If your main character is supposed to be who we\’re rooting for, then she shouldn\’t be constantly obnoxious and childish. Note that this contradicts her supposed maturity. If her whiny behavior dominates the book\’s conversation, then she\’s not mature.

    First, they said border-line abusive. Second, not all abuse is physical. Edward emotionally and mentally abuses Bella. This is related to her complete reliance on him. His over protective nature resulting from his vampire blood teaches Bella not to trust in herself, but to trust in him instead. This a major form of emotional abuse and can cripple a person\’s confidence and independence.

    A love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town is cliché because it\’s a love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town. It\’s a very basic, predictable twist on forbidden love and blood feuds. Think Romeo and Juliet, but much worse. The little town scenario is so overused it has been rendered completely meaningless. These novels are just generic copies of old plot lines.

    If this is a young adult novel, then why does it resemble a sexual fantasy almost to the letter. My thirteen-year-old sister, who is helping me write this, caught a great deal of sexual references and adult themes without my assistance. The books make people, including Robert Pattinson, uncomfortable. It\’s actually completely inappropriate for young adults as it seems to sponsor creeping into a girl\’s room and watching her sleep, emotional abuse, pedophilia, and other behaviors that are generally frowned upon. As this is quite apparently Meyer\’s sexual fantasy, these young adults become overwhelmed by the raw emotion of a lust driven story, especially seeing that there is no true connection beyond physical characteristics between Bella and Edward that is mentioned. Young adults, for whom these novels are supposedly written, are still exploring their notions of the world. Not only does this imply that looks are everything in a relationship, but citing lust as the cornerstone of a \”true love\” relationship is so damaging to the true meaning of love that it causes these girls to become completely obsessed with Edward because, as he is fictional, he would be their only chance at what is implied to be true love in the novels.

    We had to save this one for the end. \”Geeky flying wizards\” have been far more popular for far longer. These books have complicated plot lines and three dimensional characters. The people feel real, despite the wizardry aspect. In comparison Twilight is so simplistic that it provides no real mental stimulus. Harry Potter books appeal to a much wider age range, which helps to explain why they can take the time to make an excellent movie without worrying about losing the interest of the screaming preteen girls that Twilight needs to survive.

    Lastly, we took the time to respond to your post because, not only do we blatantly disagree with you, but you seem to miss the point of opinions and literary criticism. You seem so proud that you\’ve read the books, yet you demonstrate no understanding of the beauty of what literature actually is. Literature is based on opinions. You are welcome to yours and I am allowed mine. It is what makes literature fascinating. However, lashing out in disagreement without backing up an argument just hurts your cause. It makes you seem defensive, fueling the idea that the person you are arguing against is, in fact, correct. Literary criticism should be based on what\’s in the story as well as opinions.

    We hope that you will use our comments to improve your debate. The goal is not to change opinions but explore and better explain them.

    Sincerely yours,
    Say and Em

    \”I open at the close.\”

    P.S. Learn to spell. Psychotic. Yes, there are silent letters but we learn those in the third grade. Circumstances. At least I think that\’s what you meant. Responsible. Please proof read if you want to be taken seriously.

    \”Mischief managed.\”

  934. Say and Em
    Posted August 15, 2009 at 3:57 am

    I solemnly swear that I am up to no good.

    I am sad that it wont let me use correct punctuation.

    To Meg:

    Thank you for proving all of the above points, like the horrible grammar in the like.

    Bella is a flat character, which is extremely bad for a main focus of several novels. The characteristics are too stereotypical to count for a personality. Its like Ms. Meyer went down a teenager checklist of traits. The Mary Sue reference has nothing to do with who she interacts with, so youre missing the point. Mary Sue is implying that Bella is too static of a character: unchanging and predictable. There are no conflicting traits and she has a very flexible set of morals.

    Bella only gets seriously injured once and thats because Edward isnt there to save her. Her injuries arent even the her own fault.

    In the nine months without Edward, she is still completely focused upon him. Youre correct that she does not attempt suicide, but she seems extremely depressed and she takes extreme risks which could easily lead to death, so it appears that it crossed her mind at least once. She heard Edwards voice every time she did something stupid anyway, which just proves my point: dependent and creepy.

    Yes, we know Stephanie Meyer is not a teenager with a vampire boyfriend, but thats not the point. Again, youre off the mark. She is basing the characters and plot so much off her fantasies that in effect Bella is a fictional representation of the author to the point where its concerning. When the actor that plays Edward Cullen thinks that the books are a written down version of Meyers sexual fantasies you know theres a problem.

    First of all, to become a New York Bestseller you have to sell a lot of copies, so your pieces of evidence are completely redundant. Also, as stated above, the major fans of this book, primarily preteen to teenage girls, are completely obsessed with the attractiveness of Edward Cullen. Sex sells, as they say. Ive actually heard stories of men getting dumped because their girlfriends want to find Edward. That, if anything, further proves the point of this book being focused around Meyers fantasies. Im happy you have a boyfriend that you care about, but youre the exception not the rule.

    Life threatening circumstances can be put into any situation with words. They do not make a story interesting. There are life threatening situations discussed in medical journals, but I doubt that, unless youre a medical student, you find them interesting. The application of a commonly used plot scenario does not make a good book.

    As previously presented, the fact that Edward is indeed a vampire and thus a killer is a plot point, not a flaw. If he wasnt a vampire there would even less of a story. The other traits, overt caution and over protectiveness, are a result of being a vampire and a killer. Though they could be considered flaws, these are static flaws. They are stereotypical and thus do not count.

    The listed characteristics that make Bellas assumed personality are again very stereotypical. Sarcasm is practically a necessity of being a teenager. Bellas slight ability to be funny is directly tied to her sarcastic nature. Even so, she seems extremely deadpan and thus has no real sense of humor. Responsibility and maturity are almost identical and thus redundant. Strange and lovable are extremely variable and depend on your perception of normalcy. The very fact that there is a vampire involved in this story means that the characters will have a strangeness because it alters the variables and thus the reaction. Also, having low confidence is a common characteristic of being a teenager and does not constitute a personality. Meyer doesn’t even give her a distinct attractive characteristic, deciding to keep her very plain. Its sticking with the typical, overused forbidden love story.

    She really has no independence from Edward. She needs him for everything. When he leaves her in the second book, she is so devastated that her father, who rarely makes a real appearance involving her personal feelings, asks her if shes okay and if she can initiate her social life without him. She is sulking in the house for months. Oh, and thank you for stating the extremely obvious fact that Edward is indeed a vampire. I think we know.

    Fathers always hate boyfriends, especially in the beginning. This does not constitute a father thats in tune with his daughter or a father that questions what her daughter is doing. He doesnt express any real concern until shes wallowing in the house all day, something thats hard to miss. He is completely oblivious to her emotions and her struggles.

    Bellas past and personality are never developed beyond the bare basics in all four of the novels. Shes flat, unchanging, and with no true uniqueness. There is no real connection with her family and her life before Edward. The story is so focused on their relationship that it loses all of its realism to the reader. We know vampires and werewolves arent real, but the characters should feel realistic. Rosalie and Emmett are barely touched upon in the later books. The stories are told, but not explored. Jasper is also left undeveloped, though not as much as Rosalie and Emmett. If you are going to make a major character, they have to have more of a purpose and more of a life then what is imperative to the plot. Otherwise, they seem pointless or the lack of information becomes a major distraction.

    I dont know if I should respond to this one because you just completely contradicted yourself about Bellas whining. You ask how she can be considered whiny, and then justify and explain why shes whiny. Make up your mind. Yes, I admit that being stalked by a vampire that actually intends to kill would put a slight damper on my day, but she becomes obnoxious to the point where it irritates the reader, not her fellow characters. If your main character is supposed to be who were rooting for, then she shouldnt be constantly obnoxious and childish. Note that this contradicts her supposed maturity. If her whiny behavior dominates the books conversation, then shes not mature.

    First, they said border-line abusive. Second, not all abuse is physical. Edward emotionally and mentally abuses Bella. This is related to her complete reliance on him. His over protective nature resulting from his vampire blood teaches Bella not to trust in herself, but to trust in him instead. This a major form of emotional abuse and can cripple a persons confidence and independence.

    A love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town is cliché because its a love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town. It’s a very basic, predictable twist on forbidden love and blood feuds. Think Romeo and Juliet, but much worse. The little town scenario is so overused it has been rendered completely meaningless. These novels are just generic copies of old plot lines.

    If this is a young adult novel, then why does it resemble a sexual fantasy almost to the letter. My thirteen-year-old sister, who is helping me write this, caught a great deal of sexual references and adult themes without my assistance. The books make people, including Robert Pattinson, uncomfortable. Its actually completely inappropriate for young adults as it seems to sponsor creeping into a girls room and watching her sleep, emotional abuse, pedophilia, and other behaviors that are generally frowned upon. As this is quite apparently Meyers sexual fantasy, these young adults become overwhelmed by the raw emotion of a lust driven story, especially seeing that there is no true connection beyond physical characteristics between Bella and Edward that is mentioned. Young adults, for whom these novels are supposedly written, are still exploring their notions of the world. Not only does this imply that looks are everything in a relationship, but citing lust as the cornerstone of a true love relationship is so damaging to the true meaning of love that it causes these girls to become completely obsessed with Edward because, as he is fictional, he would be their only chance at what is implied to be true love in the novels.

    We had to save this one for the end. Geeky flying wizards have been far more popular for far longer. These books have complicated plot lines and three dimensional characters. The people feel real, despite the wizardry aspect. In comparison Twilight is so simplistic that it provides no real mental stimulus. Harry Potter books appeal to a much wider age range, which helps to explain why they can take the time to make an excellent movie without worrying about losing the interest of the screaming preteen girls that Twilight needs to survive. Also, why does Twilight need to be constantly shoved in our face? Harry Potter and his so called geeky flying wizards do not need to be present in every single store to make money.

    Lastly, we took the time to respond to your post because, not only do we blatantly disagree with you, but you seem to miss the point of opinions and literary criticism. You seem so proud that youve read the books, yet you demonstrate no understanding of the beauty of what literature actually is. Literature is based on opinions. You are welcome to yours and I am allowed mine. It is what makes literature fascinating. However, lashing out in disagreement without backing up an argument just hurts your cause. It makes you seem defensive, fueling the idea that the person you are arguing against is, in fact, correct. Literary criticism should be based on whats in the story as well as opinions.

    We hope that you will use our comments to improve your debate. The goal is not to change opinions but explore and better explain them.

    Sincerely yours,
    Say and Em

    I open at the close.

    P.S. Learn to spell. Psychotic. Yes, there are silent letters but we learn those in the third grade. Circumstances. At least I think thats what you meant. Responsible. Please proof read if you want to be taken seriously.

    Mischief managed.

  935. Say and Em
    Posted August 15, 2009 at 3:58 am

    I solemnly swear that I am up to no good.

    I am sad that it wont let me use correct punctuation.

    To Meg:

    Thank you for proving all of the above points, like the horrible grammar in the like.

    Bella is a flat character, which is extremely bad for a main focus of several novels. The characteristics are too stereotypical to count for a personality. Its like Ms. Meyer went down a teenager checklist of traits. The Mary Sue reference has nothing to do with who she interacts with, so youre missing the point. Mary Sue is implying that Bella is too static of a character: unchanging and predictable. There are no conflicting traits and she has a very flexible set of morals.

    Bella only gets seriously injured once and thats because Edward isnt there to save her. Her injuries arent even the her own fault.

    In the nine months without Edward, she is still completely focused upon him. Youre correct that she does not attempt suicide, but she seems extremely depressed and she takes extreme risks which could easily lead to death, so it appears that it crossed her mind at least once. She heard Edwards voice every time she did something stupid anyway, which just proves my point: dependent and creepy.

    Yes, we know Stephanie Meyer is not a teenager with a vampire boyfriend, but thats not the point. Again, youre off the mark. She is basing the characters and plot so much off her fantasies that in effect Bella is a fictional representation of the author to the point where its concerning. When the actor that plays Edward Cullen thinks that the books are a written down version of Meyers sexual fantasies you know theres a problem.

    First of all, to become a New York Bestseller you have to sell a lot of copies, so your pieces of evidence are completely redundant. Also, as stated above, the major fans of this book, primarily preteen to teenage girls, are completely obsessed with the attractiveness of Edward Cullen. Sex sells, as they say. Ive actually heard stories of men getting dumped because their girlfriends want to find Edward. That, if anything, further proves the point of this book being focused around Meyers fantasies. Im happy you have a boyfriend that you care about, but youre the exception not the rule.

    Life threatening circumstances can be put into any situation with words. They do not make a story interesting. There are life threatening situations discussed in medical journals, but I doubt that, unless youre a medical student, you find them interesting. The application of a commonly used plot scenario does not make a good book.

    As previously presented, the fact that Edward is indeed a vampire and thus a killer is a plot point, not a flaw. If he wasnt a vampire there would even less of a story. The other traits, overt caution and over protectiveness, are a result of being a vampire and a killer. Though they could be considered flaws, these are static flaws. They are stereotypical and thus do not count.

    The listed characteristics that make Bellas assumed personality are again very stereotypical. Sarcasm is practically a necessity of being a teenager. Bellas slight ability to be funny is directly tied to her sarcastic nature. Even so, she seems extremely deadpan and thus has no real sense of humor. Responsibility and maturity are almost identical and thus redundant. Strange and lovable are extremely variable and depend on your perception of normalcy. The very fact that there is a vampire involved in this story means that the characters will have a strangeness because it alters the variables and thus the reaction. Also, having low confidence is a common characteristic of being a teenager and does not constitute a personality. Meyer doesnt even give her a distinct attractive characteristic, deciding to keep her very plain. Its sticking with the typical, overused forbidden love story.

    She really has no independence from Edward. She needs him for everything. When he leaves her in the second book, she is so devastated that her father, who rarely makes a real appearance involving her personal feelings, asks her if shes okay and if she can initiate her social life without him. She is sulking in the house for months. Oh, and thank you for stating the extremely obvious fact that Edward is indeed a vampire. I think we know.

    Fathers always hate boyfriends, especially in the beginning. This does not constitute a father thats in tune with his daughter or a father that questions what her daughter is doing. He doesnt express any real concern until shes wallowing in the house all day, something thats hard to miss. He is completely oblivious to her emotions and her struggles.

    Bellas past and personality are never developed beyond the bare basics in all four of the novels. Shes flat, unchanging, and with no true uniqueness. There is no real connection with her family and her life before Edward. The story is so focused on their relationship that it loses all of its realism to the reader. We know vampires and werewolves arent real, but the characters should feel realistic. Rosalie and Emmett are barely touched upon in the later books. The stories are told, but not explored. Jasper is also left undeveloped, though not as much as Rosalie and Emmett. If you are going to make a major character, they have to have more of a purpose and more of a life then what is imperative to the plot. Otherwise, they seem pointless or the lack of information becomes a major distraction.

    I dont know if I should respond to this one because you just completely contradicted yourself about Bellas whining. You ask how she can be considered whiny, and then justify and explain why shes whiny. Make up your mind. Yes, I admit that being stalked by a vampire that actually intends to kill would put a slight damper on my day, but she becomes obnoxious to the point where it irritates the reader, not her fellow characters. If your main character is supposed to be who were rooting for, then she shouldnt be constantly obnoxious and childish. Note that this contradicts her supposed maturity. If her whiny behavior dominates the books conversation, then shes not mature.

    First, they said border-line abusive. Second, not all abuse is physical. Edward emotionally and mentally abuses Bella. This is related to her complete reliance on him. His over protective nature resulting from his vampire blood teaches Bella not to trust in herself, but to trust in him instead. This a major form of emotional abuse and can cripple a persons confidence and independence.

    A love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town is cliché because its a love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town. It\’s a very basic, predictable twist on forbidden love and blood feuds. Think Romeo and Juliet, but much worse. The little town scenario is so overused it has been rendered completely meaningless. These novels are just generic copies of old plot lines.

    If this is a young adult novel, then why does it resemble a sexual fantasy almost to the letter. My thirteen-year-old sister, who is helping me write this, caught a great deal of sexual references and adult themes without my assistance. The books make people, including Robert Pattinson, uncomfortable. Its actually completely inappropriate for young adults as it seems to sponsor creeping into a girls room and watching her sleep, emotional abuse, pedophilia, and other behaviors that are generally frowned upon. As this is quite apparently Meyers sexual fantasy, these young adults become overwhelmed by the raw emotion of a lust driven story, especially seeing that there is no true connection beyond physical characteristics between Bella and Edward that is mentioned. Young adults, for whom these novels are supposedly written, are still exploring their notions of the world. Not only does this imply that looks are everything in a relationship, but citing lust as the cornerstone of a true love relationship is so damaging to the true meaning of love that it causes these girls to become completely obsessed with Edward because, as he is fictional, he would be their only chance at what is implied to be true love in the novels.

    We had to save this one for the end. Geeky flying wizards have been far more popular for far longer. These books have complicated plot lines and three dimensional characters. The people feel real, despite the wizardry aspect. In comparison Twilight is so simplistic that it provides no real mental stimulus. Harry Potter books appeal to a much wider age range, which helps to explain why they can take the time to make an excellent movie without worrying about losing the interest of the screaming preteen girls that Twilight needs to survive. Also, why does Twilight need to be constantly shoved in our face? Harry Potter and his so called geeky flying wizards do not need to be present in every single store to make money.

    Lastly, we took the time to respond to your post because, not only do we blatantly disagree with you, but you seem to miss the point of opinions and literary criticism. You seem so proud that youve read the books, yet you demonstrate no understanding of the beauty of what literature actually is. Literature is based on opinions. You are welcome to yours and I am allowed mine. It is what makes literature fascinating. However, lashing out in disagreement without backing up an argument just hurts your cause. It makes you seem defensive, fueling the idea that the person you are arguing against is, in fact, correct. Literary criticism should be based on whats in the story as well as opinions.

    We hope that you will use our comments to improve your debate. The goal is not to change opinions but explore and better explain them.

    Sincerely yours,
    Say and Em

    I open at the close.

    P.S. Learn to spell. Psychotic. Yes, there are silent letters but we learn those in the third grade. Circumstances. At least I think thats what you meant. Responsible. Please proof read if you want to be taken seriously.

    Mischief managed.

  936. Say and Em
    Posted August 15, 2009 at 4:02 am

    I solemnly swear that I am up to no good.

    I am sad that it wont let me use correct punctuation.

    To Meg,

    Thank you for proving all of the above points, like the horrible grammar and the like.

    Bella is a flat character, which is extremely bad for a main focus of several novels. The characteristics are too stereotypical to count for a personality. Its like Ms. Meyer went down a teenager checklist of traits. The Mary Sue reference has nothing to do with who she interacts with, so youre missing the point. Mary Sue is implying that Bella is too static of a character, unchanging and predictable. There are no conflicting traits and she has a very flexible set of morals.

    Bella only gets seriously injured once and thats because Edward isnt there to save her. Her injuries arent even the her own fault.

    In the nine months without Edward, she is still completely focused upon him. Youre correct that she does not attempt suicide, but she seems extremely depressed and she takes extreme risks which could easily lead to death, so it appears that it crossed her mind at least once. She heard Edwards voice every time she did something stupid anyway, which just proves my point: dependent and creepy.

    Yes, we know Stephanie Meyer is not a teenager with a vampire boyfriend, but thats not the point. Again, youre off the mark. She is basing the characters and plot so much off her fantasies that in effect Bella is a fictional representation of the author to the point where its concerning. When the actor that plays Edward Cullen thinks that the books are a written down version of Meyers sexual fantasies you know theres a problem.

    First of all, to become a New York Bestseller you have to sell a lot of copies, so your pieces of evidence are completely redundant. Also, as stated above, the major fans of this book, primarily preteen to teenage girls, are completely obsessed with the attractiveness of Edward Cullen. Sex sells, as they say. Ive actually heard stories of men getting dumped because their girlfriends want to find Edward. That, if anything, further proves the point of this book being focused around Meyers fantasies. Im happy you have a boyfriend that you care about, but youre the exception not the rule.

    Life threatening circumstances can be put into any situation with words. They do not make a story interesting. There are life threatening situations discussed in medical journals, but I doubt that, unless youre a medical student, you find them interesting. The application of a commonly used plot scenario does not make a good book.

    As previously presented, the fact that Edward is indeed a vampire and thus a killer is a plot point, not a flaw. If he wasnt a vampire there would even less of a story. The other traits, overt caution and over protectiveness, are a result of being a vampire and a killer. Though they could be considered flaws, these are static flaws. They are stereotypical and thus do not count.

    The listed characteristics that make Bellas assumed personality are again very stereotypical. Sarcasm is practically a necessity of being a teenager. Bellas slight ability to be funny is directly tied to her sarcastic nature. Even so, she seems extremely deadpan and thus has no real sense of humor. Responsibility and maturity are almost identical and thus redundant. Strange and lovable are extremely variable and depend on your perception of normalcy. The very fact that there is a vampire involved in this story means that the characters will have a strangeness because it alters the variables and thus the reaction. Also, having low confidence is a common characteristic of being a teenager and does not constitute a personality. Meyer doesnt even give her a distinct attractive characteristic, deciding to keep her very plain. Its sticking with the typical, overused forbidden love story.

    She really has no independence from Edward. She needs him for everything. When he leaves her in the second book, she is so devastated that her father, who rarely makes a real appearance involving her personal feelings, asks her if shes okay and if she can initiate her social life without him. She is sulking in the house for months. Oh, and thank you for stating the extremely obvious fact that Edward is indeed a vampire. I think we know.

    Fathers always hate boyfriends, especially in the beginning. This does not constitute a father thats in tune with his daughter or a father that questions what her daughter is doing. He doesnt express any real concern until shes wallowing in the house all day, something thats hard to miss. He is completely oblivious to her emotions and her struggles.

    Bellas past and personality are never developed beyond the bare basics in all four of the novels. Shes flat, unchanging, and with no true uniqueness. There is no real connection with her family and her life before Edward. The story is so focused on their relationship that it loses all of its realism to the reader. We know vampires and werewolves arent real, but the characters should feel realistic. Rosalie and Emmett are barely touched upon in the later books. The stories are told, but not explored. Jasper is also left undeveloped, though not as much as Rosalie and Emmett. If you are going to make a major character, they have to have more of a purpose and more of a life then what is imperative to the plot. Otherwise, they seem pointless or the lack of information becomes a major distraction.

    I dont know if I should respond to this one because you just completely contradicted yourself about Bellas whining. You ask how she can be considered whiny, and then justify and explain why shes whiny. Make up your mind. Yes, I admit that being stalked by a vampire that actually intends to kill would put a slight damper on my day, but she becomes obnoxious to the point where it irritates the reader, not her fellow characters. If your main character is supposed to be who were rooting for, then she shouldnt be constantly obnoxious and childish. Note that this contradicts her supposed maturity. If her whiny behavior dominates the books conversation, then shes not mature.

    First, they said border line abusive. Second, not all abuse is physical. Edward emotionally and mentally abuses Bella. This is related to her complete reliance on him. His over protective nature resulting from his vampire blood teaches Bella not to trust in herself, but to trust in him instead. This a major form of emotional abuse and can cripple a persons confidence and independence.

    A love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town is cliché because its a love story about vampires and werewolves in a little town. Its a very basic, predictable twist on forbidden love and blood feuds. Think Romeo and Juliet, but much worse. The little town scenario is so overused it has been rendered completely meaningless. These novels are just generic copies of old plot lines.

    If this is a young adult novel, then why does it resemble a sexual fantasy almost to the letter. My thirteen-year-old sister, who is helping me write this, caught a great deal of sexual references and adult themes without my assistance. The books make people, including Robert Pattinson, uncomfortable. Its actually completely inappropriate for young adults as it seems to sponsor creeping into a girls room and watching her sleep, emotional abuse, pedophilia, and other behaviors that are generally frowned upon. As this is quite apparently Meyers sexual fantasy, these young adults become overwhelmed by the raw emotion of a lust driven story, especially seeing that there is no true connection beyond physical characteristics between Bella and Edward that is mentioned. Young adults, for whom these novels are supposedly written, are still exploring their notions of the world. Not only does this imply that looks are everything in a relationship, but citing lust as the cornerstone of a true love relationship is so damaging to the true meaning of love that it causes these girls to become completely obsessed with Edward because, as he is fictional, he would be their only chance at what is implied to be true love in the novels.

    We had to save this one for the end. Geeky flying wizards have been far more popular for far longer. These books have complicated plot lines and three dimensional characters. The people feel real, despite the wizardry aspect. In comparison Twilight is so simplistic that it provides no real mental stimulus. Harry Potter books appeal to a much wider age range, which helps to explain why they can take the time to make an excellent movie without worrying about losing the interest of the screaming preteen girls that Twilight needs to survive. Also, why does Twilight need to be constantly shoved in our face? Harry Potter and his so called geeky flying wizards do not need to be present in every single store to make money.

    Lastly, we took the time to respond to your post because, not only do we blatantly disagree with you, but you seem to miss the point of opinions and literary criticism. You seem so proud that youve read the books, yet you demonstrate no understanding of the beauty of what literature actually is. Literature is based on opinions. You are welcome to yours and I am allowed mine. It is what makes literature fascinating. However, lashing out in disagreement without backing up an argument just hurts your cause. It makes you seem defensive, fueling the idea that the person you are arguing against is, in fact, correct. Literary criticism should be based on whats in the story as well as opinions.

    We hope that you will use our comments to improve your debate. The goal is not to change opinions but explore and better explain them.

    Sincerely yours,
    Say and Em

    I open at the close.

    P.S. Learn to spell. Psychotic. Yes, there are silent letters but we learn those in the third grade. Circumstances. At least I think thats what you meant. Responsible. Please proof read if you want to be taken seriously.

    Mischief managed.

  937. Luana
    Posted August 15, 2009 at 6:51 am

    While I can see the point of and agree with many comments posted here, I just feel compelled to explain why the series appealed to me; maybe it would make some of the “haters” understand the attraction this series has for some of us:

    I understand what it feels like to be obsessive about another person and know that is crazy to feel that way but be powerless to stop how you feel. The series brought back some memories from many years ago…..and that was pretty awesome-also being torn between more than one person…..
    that sucks

    I can relate to instant attraction and intense chemistry and how when that happens for a person it can rule your every thought and action…..if you are ever blessed enough to find someone who you love beyond reason, can’t imagine living without….. then this series will click for you

    Above all else for me, it was the idea of having someone love you so completely and selflessly when you feel unworthy
    because you don’t see enough in yourself to believe someone else could feel that way about you……and finally there is the belief that some people come into our lives and we become the best versions of ourselves only when we are with them………..

    So, bash away; I am flawed, weak, incomplete, codependent woman who struggles with self esteem issues and I bet there are a lot more of us in the world than those who sit up on their high horses judging and berating others for things that they like or love………….

  938. Tasha
    Posted August 16, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    You’re so funny and so right. I actually do like Twilight, but I agree with you. Thank God, I don’t take that these books seriously. These books are meant for pre-teens It’s okay when you’re young and “Edward” could be your boyfriend when you’re 12 years old. Older teenagers and grown women(and some men) should know better than to lose your head over the twilight books. It’s not for real people! I do agree with a lot of folks that feel Edward is a stalker and a total azzhole. In the second book he left her, just bounced on her. What type of b.s. is that?

    Here’s my beef with Twilight: How to do can you fall in love, and know that you are going to stay in love this guy forever? Bella?

    #89: Light Yagami would had gotten ill and took out the “Notebook” on this one

  939. neethumb
    Posted August 17, 2009 at 8:07 am

    id just like to point out like countless others have i like twilight but im not crazy about it
    i think it would have less people who hate it if those crazy people out there wearnt so crazy
    the bit about the population dying out was hilaciouas
    but the pedophelia part was an exageration if u ask me
    i reakon this is a good book not the best unlike the garth nix books
    and the bit about harrypotter was allright but harry potter was only a fraction better
    but one thing u guys all seem to miss is the bit were alice rps james head off and the fighting and stuff that was awesome
    the book would be good but it would be better as a world wich to set a whole lot of different stories in
    i know two girls at school who are obcessed and they are a litlle weird they havel like these rings with bella and edward kissing
    by the way im a boy so that knbocks out one of ur things
    this list was good but a bit harsh u shouldnt be knocking someones book just beacause a bunch of teens are crazy
    it was hilarious some bits though

  940. Joseph
    Posted August 17, 2009 at 11:02 am

    Good list.. if you were to read Twilight, why not read Harry Potter instead, or Eragon, or the Lord of the Rings, or a Song of Ice and Fire, maybe even the Chronicles of Narnia (that is if you are christian, or can ignore the christian implications without annoyance). What I mean is twilight isn’t well written (in fact as a writer I think that it’s quite horribly written) and isn’t a great story, so why not switch to something that’s at least one of those things, or both (the Lord of the Rings). I do get that tweens (that is 10 through 13 year olds) might have trouble reading tLotR, but still Harry Potter and Eragon and even the Hobbit are pretty easy to read.

    As a side note, has anybody else noticed that all modern high fantasy is about teenagers or children. seriously, Froto was over fourty if I recall correctly and so was Bilbo in the Hobbit, and those were some of the most successful high fantasy books to date, why not go that way.

    P.S. I have not read all of the Twilight books, or even finished the first, I had to stop because just reading it made my writing emotionless and dry.

  941. sarah
    Posted August 17, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    Serena Belle
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 4:47 am

    what a nasty piece of work you are!!!

  942. PP
    Posted August 17, 2009 at 9:09 pm

    The people who wrote this silly list have nothing better to do with their idle time than to laugh at Stephenie, who had the balls and the determination to follow her dreams, like many other authors. If everyone listened to people like you .. no one would ever publish anything.

    You’re spiteful and that is nothing to be proud of. This also applies to the numerous vindicitve commenters who have posted here.

  943. pancake
    Posted August 18, 2009 at 12:31 pm

    Respect! *shakes your hand*
    Did u have some Veritaserum before making this? lol

    “The reason Edward can’t read Bella’s mind is because she doesn’t have one.”

  944. Annon..
    Posted August 19, 2009 at 10:26 pm

    55.They fall in love way too quickly and it seems fake because no one falls in love instantly, especially teenagers.

    Not exactly true… It seems that all teenagers around this age group fall in ‘love’ instantly only to break-up moths later…

    LoL at 18…

    Stephen King wrote ‘Shawshank Redemption’. Stephen King knows twists and plot structure. Stephen King can create round characters. In 200 years odds are that people will still be reading S.K. Take not Meyer…

    F-K all of you who defend these books. Trust me… You will regret tring to be Bella, as odds are that you will end up with an abusive, overly protective husband.

  945. annon
    Posted August 19, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    Also… @ all of you fangirls who claimed that it saved your life:

    I knew a girl who killed herself because her ‘perfect’ boyfreind broke up with her after being together for 2 WEEKS. I was good freinds with her and the note she left said ‘he was my Edward’. She was an avid fan of Twilight…

    If you do enjoy these serriously take note that Bella has no independence and acts like a female sterotype from the 19th century.

  946. annon
    Posted August 19, 2009 at 10:34 pm

    Finnally @ Joseph…

    Couldn\’t agree more. Eragon is one of the most entertaining and well writen books for young adults (Ages 14-16) because it was writen by one.

  947. Raven
    Posted August 19, 2009 at 11:52 pm

    I just read that list, and most of those opinions are silly. I really enjoyed reading the Twilight Seris and have now read it twice. But i think it is just personal opionon of whether you like vampire books or not, i like some Ann Rice books but her’s get very repetative over a time and are boring. this book appeals to all the girls out there who don’t see themselves as popular/pretty/smart. It is just a way to escape everyday life, which is what i believe a book to be.

    (sorry if i spelt anything wrong, you can blaim the english school system for that)

  948. Bethany
    Posted August 20, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    OMW! I was on the floor laughing. This is AMAZING. Seriously.

    This list is my new best friend ^_^

  949. Paolo
    Posted August 22, 2009 at 1:58 am

    LOL

    only 95? I bet you could do more!

    “Do any guys actually like Twilight?”

    I especially liked this one

    But guys could actually use this

    read a twilight book, says he likes it to score a gazillion girls

  950. Posted August 22, 2009 at 10:45 pm

    Why are you guys making such a big deal out of this? It’s just a book, people can have different opinions about it.

    In my opinion I think the book should have stopped around the second book. It’s like stretching out a gum, the gum is already thin enough, and the more you stretch it a hole would appear in the middle. That’s what’s happening to the Twilight Series.

    People have the freedom of thoughts. Just because YOU (The fans) like it doesn’t mean you should start going insane just because others don’t.

    Don’t contradict this post, because it’s true. Bye guys, happy hunting for good novels to read.

  951. angggg
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 12:25 am

    i LOVE the entire series mostly because edward is ‘effin hot however reading your list made me sigh because 99% of everything you said is true and I agree with hahahah.

  952. Isabel
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    It angers me to share the same name with such a hideous character.

    I agree, these books are a crime agianst nature, since trees were cut to print their useless pages. I don’t know why girls find this lame vampire so appealing.

    The idea of bieng rescued by a hot guy in your entire life must be the the only reason they life, which is a pointless life indeed.

    Well, at least you get to laugh of the lame words their fans sent you.

  953. Tahnee and Kaitlyn
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    We belivev that most of your things are true. we have both enjoyed the series, (hated breaking dawn), but def believ with your reasoning. (K) I never love the books or went crazy about them and the movies not much better. I REALLY HATE ROBERT PATTINSON. (Jacob fan forever, and Alice fan)
    (T) Dude you are so right no character development, and nothing’s original except for perhaps that they dont burn in the sun, the SPARKLE FOR F***S SAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!! There are also no shocking twists its like when someone’s hooked up to a heart rate moniter all flat with the very occasional mole hill like bump
    you want vampires that are cool, Read the “House of Night Series” these are original and have no vampire werewolf warefare!!!!
    (K) Also read the vampire beach novels for an easy but GOOD AND ORIGINAL!!!!!!
    WE HATE TWILIGHT!!!!!!!!!!
    <3 some randoms XD

  954. eliza
    Posted August 25, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    I used to love Twilight until I realized how horribly written it was and how true you were in everything listed above. Well done.

  955. -Sinead
    Posted August 26, 2009 at 12:48 am

    I agree, there are so many vampire books out there most of them simillar in one way or another and before Rob played the role of Edward it was a flop i mean it only really became popular because of Rob and tbh his looks get boring.

  956. Tom
    Posted August 26, 2009 at 7:26 am

    I know officialy want your babies more than i do snape, hiro nakamura, sylar and spocks combined!!!!

    you also forgot the film had the WORST acting i’ve ever seen, and i’ve seen clips from that film with lee ryan from BLUE in it!!

    Twilight is so bad it put me off vampires, and i read the anne rice “vampire cronicals” when i was 6 so i’ve been obsessed for 10 years!! or more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Once again thank you for being person with a frigging BRAIN, Also if edawrd is meant ot be so hot, when does the guy playing him not look hot??

  957. mimi
    Posted August 26, 2009 at 8:58 am

    I agree with most of the things that you listed. I just want to point out something about Meyer projecting herself as Bella. Every writer does that to some extend, even unconsciously. They put something from their own life, or dreams or personality in their characters. I remember reading, that the main character in the Shining by Stephen King was influenced by his own life at that point. But he realized that later. The sad thing is, that Meyer has nothing interesting to put into her character, which leads to interesting conclusions..

    I have a friend, who has never heard of Twilight, really. He just doesn’t have much time for trends and things like that. He is lucky. When I wanted to explain to him about the Twilight books he simply said “Well OK, but I haven’t heard about that”. That made me think, that all this hype is created not only by the fans, but by the people, who don’t like the books.
    There is profanity everywhere – movies, music, yes even books. There are tons of bad literature out there. My point is – people pay way too much attention on those mediocre books. If there is less attention, there is less irritation. leave twilight fans to obsess over the story, and after awhile it will all be forgotten. My opinion – too much talking about the books – no matter in positive or negative light, makes them more popular.

    P.S. I apologize for any language mistakes. English is not my first language.

  958. mimi
    Posted August 26, 2009 at 9:43 am

    I saw i made a mistake, for which I apologize – i didn’t want to say Profanity, but I meant something with less intellectual content. I apologize again – my English is to blame.

  959. Cameron
    Posted August 27, 2009 at 12:21 am

    lmao! wow, you seriously deserve sainthood! i agree fully with every single number on there!

    and a note to this:
    I HATE U, U HAD NO RIGHT TO MAKE THIS!!! IF U HATED IT SO MUCH, THEN Y DID U CONTINUE TO READ THE SERIES!?!? ALL U WANT IS SOME ATTENION!!! THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO GET IT! I AM NOT INSANE, AND USING INPROPER CAPITALAZTION IS SHORTER WAY OF WRITING NOWA DAYS! US,TWILIGHT FANS HAVE THE RIGHT TO LOVE WHAT WE WANT , U R A RUDE STUCK UP PERSON , GET A LIFE AND STOP MAKING STUPID LITTLE ESSAYS ABOUT AWESOME BOOKS UR JELOUS OF, GROW UP!!

    1.she had every right to make it
    2.she explained why he kept reading it in the article, this shows you did not read the entire thing, most likely because you are in denile and couldn’t accept the fact that someone was pulling the threads out of the fabric of your fantasy
    3.if all she wants is attention then why are you giving it to her
    4.sure it is you proved it along with everyone else who posted a comment
    5.no it is not it just makes it bigger… dont see how you thought otherwise
    6.yes you do its just sad that you were tricked into believing that twilight is so great
    7.voicing an opinion is not being rude or stuck up, if it was you would be guilty of it yourself
    8.i saw someone say something that answered this one perfectly, people who hat twilgiht have lives, they just dont revolve around fictional chacachters (edward cullen)
    9.why would anyone be jealous of a book that is so stupid and… less than well made is how i’ll put it
    10.you’re the one who needs to grow up, your bashing a well put together list of reasons why so many people hate twilight with a reply that makes no sense…

    and again awesome article!

  960. Fuck You.
    Posted August 27, 2009 at 8:57 am

    “You are allowed to have your own opinion, just like we are allowed to have ours. Get over it. Twilight fans don’t seem to understand that though and attack at the mention of flaw in the book.”

    im not sure you grasped the concept of that.
    i dont think YOU understand, and you’re ‘attacking’ the book because of it’s flaws.

    ’nuff said.

  961. TCK
    Posted August 27, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    I DONT LIKE TWILIGHT LOL!!!!!!!! FAIL EPICALLY

  962. Posted August 27, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    http://purpleslinky.com/humor/satire/breaking-news-stephenie-meyer-reveals-true-identity-as-j-k-rowling/
    Read this please if you dislike The Twilight Saga!

    Twilight contains necrophilia and beastiality as we mentioned before. It is also extremely badly written

    It is extremely mediocre and if you want good literature please read Ann Rice!

  963. Terra
    Posted August 27, 2009 at 8:45 pm

    Your my hero babe

  964. Posted August 27, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    Hey, its me alone this time lol,
    Okay soooooooooo
    Twilight is the product of time and money:
    Time is money:
    So Twilight is money squared:
    Money is the root of all evil:
    So Twilight =evil
    Therefore
    I think twilight should be destroyed. BUFFY WILL STAKE EDWARD IN THE END!!!!!!!!!! STUPID SPARKLING MAN-GIRLS.
    Buffy will get together with chuck norris and theyll kick all there butts. DEATH TO TWILIGHT!!!!!!!!!!
    Thanks for reading all our estranged comments.
    TWILIGHT IS EVIL

  965. Paolo
    Posted August 28, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    True Blood’s Better

  966. Posted August 30, 2009 at 7:42 pm

    I totally laughed and agreed at what you said. I don’t really like the book either, and definitely don’t think it deserves this much hype. I read it because my friend insisted, and I realised it really isn’t good. Thanks for making my day with this! XD

  967. Dani
    Posted August 30, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    Hey ummm, half the stuff you said didn’t make any sense, you repeated your self and it’s totally easy to tell that you don’t know what your talking about. Sorry it’s true. At least when you criticise you could get your facts straight.

  968. Posted August 31, 2009 at 12:56 am

    Isn’t it funny how all the Twilight fans try to act like they’re well-read? That makes me LOL pretty hard. If someone enjoys this series for it’s supposed “literary-quality,” then it’s pretty obvious that these people have not read much.

    Attention Twilight losers–nobody becomes an expert on literary quality from reading this crap. Stop trying to defend these horrible books from someone who has obviously had more reading experience than you will ever have.

    Go back to The Pokey Little Puppy and Cosmogirl. You know..the stuff you were reading before Twilight.

  969. Claudia
    Posted August 31, 2009 at 4:23 am

    All of you people who disagree please do shut up. All you twilight lovers are bonkers. Vampires are NOT real and neither is Edward…. Duhhhh!!!

  970. Audrey
    Posted August 31, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    Hey, I’m a twilight a fan, and I’m kinda scared to leave a comment right now, but…
    Love it or hate it I still think regardless that something that can stir emotions enough to generate this kinda list is pretty genius, I’m sure a lot of people have heard ‘no press is bad press’, and with your list all you are really doing is projecting the book even further, however humorous it may be.

  971. Michelle
    Posted August 31, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    Literary snobs, wow, is there a particular rule that states that a writer cant reach out to a certain audience… Is there something wrong with someone creating something that appeals to those who may through no fault of their own,be unable to disentangle the complex language of classics or complicated plots. Give twilight fans a break. Its interesting to read how obsessed the ‘haters’ have become.

  972. RobRum
    Posted September 1, 2009 at 2:25 am

    funny comment about true blood, its not just better….it was the blue print. the stackhouse books were not the only things used in this ripoff compilation though. Stef Meyers might have a “i hate Daddy” issue or a “i hate Men in general” issue since she could not write any of the main male characters with a backbone. Charlie is no kinda father, period. Jacob could have done way better even before he started changing. Eddie was just like any crackhead…..her blood was his crack, thats what attracted him to her in the first place. where was Blade when we needed him…:)
    solid list though. any list with a t-pain ref is good.

  973. BritGirl
    Posted September 1, 2009 at 10:53 am

    You are completely spot on with everything you have said about ‘Twilight’, and how can anyone think that Stepahine Meyer can ever be better than J K Rowling, J K Rowling is up there with the Best of the Bests and Stepanie Meyer can not even compare and is no where near J K Rowlings Standards.
    Harry Potter Beats Twilight Infinity times over. Any Person who is into Literature can identify that the writing style and standard of J K Rowling is Brilliant as evident in the Harry Potter Books, where as Stephanie Meyers is like a story written by a fantasing teenager. Am not favouring J K Rowling because am British, but I love Literature and the Best Writer are from Britain, so we Brits take Literature Seriously, I just think Twilight wasn’t really an appealing story at all, it was really boring and lame to say the least.
    Twilight isnt even Original as Stephanie herself said, “the inspiration for Twilight came from by Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice; for New Moon was Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet; Eclipse was Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights; and Breaking Dawn’s theme by two further plays of Shakespeare’s, The Merchant of Venice[34] and A Midsummer Night’s Dream”, all those mentioned are British Writers, Stephanie Meyer is nothing compared to them.
    And how can you make a Film based on the Twilight Books, when in the book it said that no man is as beautiful as Edward in the World, and then they go and Cast Robert Pattinson who many men in the World are way more Handsome then him, Its just so Ridiculous.
    To conclude I know someone who loves the Twilight books and guess what she is kinda of a Blonde such as she’s a cluts and is naive.
    Am sorry if I have insulted anyone but what I wrote is my opinion, because as a person who loves Literature can’t see how people don’t see that the Twilight Series is really Bad Literature, in both the writing and the story of it.

  974. Joseph
    Posted September 1, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    Ok, after reading a number of the bashings of the Lord of the Rings let me clear one thing up: in original west central European literature elves were tall not short. J.R.R. Tolkien was a professor that studied European history or more specifically west central European history he enjoyed their literature so much that he decided to make a more modernized version. this is where the name middle-earth comes in, the people of west central Europe back in the 1400s called that section of the world Middle-Earth however it was of course not in English but their language. also the word Mediterranean (like the Mediterranean Sea) means Middle-Earth. next time you want to say something is wrong make sure you are right first.

    Now more on subject, this list saying that you should not attack us for not liking twilight is not a contradiction if it said YOU is particular were stupid for liking twilight and attacked YOU as you have so zealously attacked me, then that would be a contradiction. as a side note, I don’t hate Stephanie Meyer, in fact I admire Stephanie Meyer. Honestly do you know how hard it is to write a book then deliver it in such a way that thousands of people will like it? and on top of that doing it with a book that by some of the most brilliant writing minds is written poorly (William Strunk JR. and E.B. White, the authors of The Elements Of Style which I and many other authors swear by) so I do admire Stephanie Meyer, however I dislike her books, that is my opinion and it will not change by you yelling at me and telling me I am stupid for disliking it.

  975. Posted September 2, 2009 at 5:57 am

    this is so true and hilarious.
    twilight is a disgrace to human race.
    and bram stroker would probably smack meyer for turning vampires into wimp.

  976. (Y)
    Posted September 2, 2009 at 9:09 am

    if you hate twilight so much, why spend the time to write stupid lists like these?
    if you dont like the book or the film, then dont read it or watch it.
    you clearly have far too much time in your day to be writing a load of made up crap about a book which you clearly dont like.

    personally, i think you need to grow up, and have some respect for other people and not just yourself.
    ’cause, tbf, it sounds like you’re pretty up yourself. :)

    that’s all.

  977. Sara
    Posted September 2, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    These Comments are Funny, do you know what, I don’t like the Twilight Books or Film, Don’t get angry Twilight fans, thats just my opinion. I Love Literature and I love the Harry Potter series, the Lord of the Rings Trilogy and the Narnia Books, the Twilight series are really bad, not to offend any Twilight Fans, but honestly look at the style of the Twilgiht Books its really Bad and the Story is really Lame. How is it that Bella is a plain girl and then most of guys introduced in the books fall for her and no girl falls for the so-called Handsome and most beautiful guy in the World ,Edward, except plain and simple Bella, I just think its weird.
    Whats so appealing about Edward anyway, Twilight fans are all waiting for their Edward, guess what there is no such thing as a Vampire, specially ones that sparkle in the Sun and can’t really die, uness they are killed by the Voultri, by chopping their heads off and buring them, wow its hadr killing a Vampire wait, they don’t exist. People need to snap into reality, they need to know the difference between Reality and Fiction.

    No one can match to the Fantasy Brilliance of J K Rowling, J R R Tolkien and C S Lewis. And to think that people actually think the Twilight series are Better than the Harry Potter Series, they are deluded, No offence, but its true, how can anyone in their right mind think Twilight is better than Harry Potter. Harry Potter is way better than Twilight, in every aspect.

    I hope I havent offended Anyone, just stating the FACTS and voicing my Opinion, if that is wrong, then why is there such a thing called ‘Freedom of Speech’.

  978. A.Star
    Posted September 3, 2009 at 10:34 am

    Grand!!! Sitting through my school day with all the little gossipers going on and on about twilight, I realy thought i was alone on the hating it factor! You know why its bad? its because its strangly addictive to a large group of people! Not in a good way but in a way that has become obssesive and (as I have had the displeasure of seeing) dangerous!!!
    So.. high five:)

  979. Mariah
    Posted September 3, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    Twilight is the saddest peice of literature to even be released on to book store shelves. It makes me literally sick to my stomach at the mention of the title. It’s sad that pre-teen girls get raging hormones over a fictional guy who in fact, HATES HIS CAREER. lol.

  980. Pinky
    Posted September 5, 2009 at 1:16 am

    I’ve had a VERY good laugh reading all the replies, I must say…

    I’m 36 and have seen many trends come and go, in music, books, etc. etc. catering to teenagers. The ‘Twilight’ series is just another one of them. In a few years, the books will be in the ‘bargain bin’ and the kiddies will move along to the next ‘greatest’ thing that they will obsess over.

    Want to argue that it won’t happen? That ‘Twilight’ is art and will be around forever? I remember that arguement being used to support the ‘art’ and ‘foreverness’ of ‘New Kids on the Block’, among MANY other things.

    I count myself lucky. When I was 12, my school librarian gave me a copy of the complete works of E. A. Poe saying to me that I would ‘get this’. I did. I also ‘got’ the other books she gave me over the next few years, like ‘The Bell Jar’, ‘How Johnny Got His Gun’ and the works of H.P. Lovecraft. Due to her, I never got into ‘trends’, just good books.

    Speaking of which, if you are into vampires, why not read something good? I did read the first ‘Twilight’ book (on the insistance of a friend who thought I would find it high comedy), and found that some middle-aged Mormon ladies palid sex fantasies really aren’t very ‘vampiric’. If you want vampires, might I suggest ‘Let the Right One In’.

  981. raven
    Posted September 5, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    Let me just say most “classic” books have a point to them when twilight just doesnt.And I do not have anything against vampire books,its just that I read the Anne Rice books a few years ago,and she gave her vampires personality,as well as personal conflict and character.
    I read twilight hoping for something intriguing and what did I get,cheesiness created for delirious teenagers.I am a teenager and cannot stand the books,but those who do,you have a right to,but calm down and keep it to yourself.

  982. Sel
    Posted September 5, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    I really dnt get the Hype around Twilight, the Story isnt even good and the Literature, dnt get me started. Not to offend Stephanie Meyer, but the Twilight series seems like a 11 year old wrote it. When you have read books like Harry Potter, LOTR, Narnia and others, you will come to realise how badly ‘the Twilight Series’ is written and how cheesy and exagerated it is. It just annoys me to here about it. I Love Harry Potter and the style of Writing of J K Rowling, Now her writing is 1st class. I love literature, and to even say that ‘Twilight’ is a good literary piece is Ridiculous, cause its not even close to being a good literary book.
    Twilight Fans who think Harry Potter, LOTR and the Narnia books are not good, are deluded, am sorry to offend you but Twilight is no-where near to the standard of the 3 book series I have mentioned above.
    Hope no Twilight Fans are offended by my Comments/Opinions.

  983. db2493
    Posted September 6, 2009 at 12:04 am

    i think the mayority of this excuses are pretty lame.. and yes im a twilight fan, but that doesnt mean i dont know the difference between a good book and a bad one.. i read twilight before it became popular so i guess im not like the other girls the wacht the movie first and read the book becuz of it. i like it and i know they r some contradictions in the book, but ur not getting the point of it. the point is that love, no matter how difficult it is, laways finds its way.. and it gives us hope. not to find an edward cullen but hope to find love someday.

  984. Elly
    Posted September 6, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    Okay, I don’t mind Twilight, but I really agree with your reasons. It’s like Twilight is just a book/movie, and okay, I must agree it’s interesting in some parts of it, but I really don’t see why it’s getting all the attention. Okay, Joanne Rowling spent years on her books, she planned, edited, worked hard, she used a wave of imagination, she created her own world, her books just make you get lost and read, read, read! While SMeyer just wrote a book, that looks like a personal journal, just replacing ‘real people with vampires. I also heard somewhere that her old friend was going to sue her, because she stole the New Moon story from her/something like that happened in her childhood. Okay, I don’t really to that, since I think that a lot of people had moments like that, where their boyfriends leave them and they feel bad and stuff, but like I said, see? She takes ideas from things that happened to her or her friends in childhood or something, well, it’s really like she’s writing a novel, but changing things in it; Seriously, I don’t know why some people think it’s better than Harry Potter.

    For your information, fangirls, who are so obsessed with Edward Cullen aka ROBERT PATTINSON.
    1. Rob acted in Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire.
    2. Rob DOESN’T LIKE Twilight. He doesn’t. HE. DOES. NOT. You can Google it if you don’t believe me.
    So, please say you like ROB, not EDWARD, because as you can see, even some of the actors in Twilight, don’t like the whole story. They just do it for money. There’s a rumour that he’s not going to act in the Eclipse movie.

    And I also agree with people who say that it’s really strange how the saga is called Twilight, and only one book is named Twilight. It’s really confusing.

    I’m not bashing Stephenie. I’m not. I think she spent a little more time and gave a lot more of her imagination in her book called The Host. It’s a good book, and I enjoyed reading it more than the Twilight series. So I’m not saying that she has no imagination or something, I’m just pointing out that she didn’t really use it for the Twilight saga.

    Now to all the comments saying: “Oh Twilight rocks, you should definately get a life. And read it!!!”
    1. If she didn’t read it. She wouldn’t be bashing the book and making reasons why she hates it.
    2. She has the right to hate Twilight as much as you have the right to like it.
    3. Why should she get a life? Seriously. You’re the ones reading and commenting something you don’t like.

    I think I’ve said enough ^^”

  985. m
    Posted September 6, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    Sure, Twilight is stereotypical.
    Sure, the hype is annoying as heck.
    And sure, you have your own opinion to voice.
    But so do I. And I know I’m speaking for more than just myself when I say that you must have actually read the books to know so much about them. Thumbs up to you, my dear; you must have a lot of free time to pick them apart so thouroughly.
    I am incredibly offended by #64, where you said Twilight fans couldn’t form complete sentences or use correct grammar/punctuation. I think I did farely well with the above, don’t you?

    ~m~

  986. Elle
    Posted September 6, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    LOL this made me crack up.

    I had once been a total twilight freak, like before it became this disgusting ‘fad’.

    Like I always hated Bella’s clingyness and whinyness, so i totally agree with that, and this book wouldn’t be so horrible if it didn’t become like an effing trend. What I really hate the most is the movies, and Robert Pattinson is ugly, as well as Kristin Stewart Fits Bella perfectly, cause she is just as bland as her, and can’t act worth crap.

    This made me really laugh though, so extra points on that!

  987. Your Mother
    Posted September 6, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    Eh, the book was so-so. I only read the first one, but it just didn\’t do anything for me.
    If people want to love a crappy book that much, I really don\’t care. It\’s just when they pretend that Edward is real. That really freaks me out.

  988. Em
    Posted September 7, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    Actually, I just checked and she did say “said” in the frist book, still I agree with you 100%. This book sucks, (HAHA get it, sucks? Vampires? LOL) The only reaon why people like this book is because Edward is a VILF and its forbidden love. Personally, he creeps me out. Team TwilightSucks!

  989. jessica paige cullen
    Posted September 8, 2009 at 2:39 am

    i love twilight ok. im a lil obsessed but i hate stephanie meyer shes such a gay person grrr… she really irritates me !

    Twilight is a beautiful book and movie. im not saying that some of the things you said are wrong but give the twilighters so slack.

    just to let you know my real last name is cullen so dont get pissy like everyone else thinking i changed it!
    she stole my name so nerr…

  990. Terese
    Posted September 9, 2009 at 4:03 am

    I don’t have a problem if people enjoy reading twilight, however, to say that it is a literary piece of art as some comments have suggested is going way to far!

    The plot is deadly dull, the characters have no substance (heck, the main character has so little personality how can you become emotionally attached or care about anything she does??) At best it should be considered a vampire themed fanfiction and believe me I have read A LOT of fan fiction that far surpasses this in quality.

  991. Katya
    Posted September 9, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    I have a reason that nobody have\\\’nt thought about yet – It\\\’s too obvious from the first page what happens in the next 100, and from the 100th what happened in the whole series. Me and my friend had a bet – he said that I coiuld\\\’nt read the twilight book in 4 days without throwing up…

  992. Lex
    Posted September 9, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    Harry Potter > Lord Voldemort
    Lord Voldemort > Cedric Diggory
    Cedric Diggory = Edward Cullen
    therefore : Harry Potter > Edward Cullen.
    Who knew that MATH something they teach in SCHOOLS! would prove that something is stupid! Go figure. Edward Cullen – sucks.

  993. Lillana
    Posted September 10, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    Harry Potter is something Twilight will never replace. I live in Croatia, and here in Balkan the new stuff come a little slowly . so okay,first High school musical was super popular and everyone loved it,but now its not popular anymore.each month,well ok,mayb more than a month,theres something new in all the charts . be it songs,books or movies . and it doesnt last for long. so i dont think twilight will last for long either.while harry potter is something amazing,that will never ever get replaced by anything,thats a book for lifetime.

  994. Lacy
    Posted September 10, 2009 at 9:28 pm

    I laughed so hard as I read this. :) I especially liked the part about Harry kicking Edward’s butt!

    And for those of you who say ” Don’t hate Twilight just because Meyer tried something new in the vampire genre,” I’ve got some news to bestow upon your ears: Meyer has done NOTHING original in this book. She’s just taken one sap of a girl, surrounded her with flawlessly sexy (and boring) vampires, made her automatically fall in love with the perfect, protective one, and gave her a totally ignorant father that lets Bella do whatever she pleases. Sure, this has not been used in the vampire genre before, but obviously because it provides nothing but a boring plotline (if you could even call it a plotline), where a perfect vampire boy and a flawlessly boring girl automatically fall in love without any conflict with each other, spend a billion hours yearning for each other in the woods, and when finally a little plot comes up… EVERYTHING TURNS OUT JUST FREAKIN’ FINE. Nothing ever progresses; there is no character developement. The only character I found interesting was Jasper, and he was almost totally ignored.

    And I agree that Harry Potter may be overrated–but only in the slightest. It is popular because it is a great, truly original story with creative, flawed characters (Who do not look like they ‘just like they got done shooting a hairgel commercial’), a fascinating, well-paced plotline, and J.K. Rowling, the author, is immensely talented!

    PS Stephanie Meyer finished the first book in a matter of months. If she really wanted to do a good job, I believe she would have taken a little more time writing it, don’t you think?

    Well, at least those airhead girls (I’m not saying all Twilight fans are airheads, but a lot of them are), who would normally never touch a book in weeks, are reading something, albeit a pointless, unrealistic vampire romance novel where the word ‘fangs’ is never used once.

  995. Andrew
    Posted September 11, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    Writers are always to be preferred to critics. Since you are so verbose, try writing something better yourself, instead of just whining about someone else’s work.

  996. Kate
    Posted September 12, 2009 at 3:44 am

    i really liked the book then the movie came out and now i hate it all!!!!

    there are so many more good vampire books out there!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  997. Posted September 12, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    Your site is the best site I’ve ever seen!!! Twilight stinks and @ my school there was an entire CLASS ALL ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  998. Laura
    Posted September 13, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    I absoluteley can’t stand Twilight and I’ve never even read it. Barely anyone even knew it existed until they were already making a movie of it — which proves right there that it needed a movie to be popular. Out of all my friends, three of them have actually read the book. Out of those three, one of them found it worth reading. I find it hard not to agree with every single point you made.

  999. Er...
    Posted September 15, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    There’s some people who have posted here claiming to HATE Twilight and they haven’t even read it. Ugh…

    I’m not a Twihard or anything, but this just reminds me of those religious people who blast Harry Potter and call it Satanic even though they haven’t read a page. Some of you need to read the books and then give a valid opinon on what you’ve read. Sure, the Twilight books are a fun read, not the best series in the world, not the best role models, but please read it before judging it, otherwise you’ll just sound like another follower jumping on the ‘I hate Twilight’ bandwagon.

    And someone said that Yiruma’s River Flows in You was inspired by Twilight. aha…haha…HAHAHAHA! I’m guessing that was a joke. Yiruma wrote that song way before Twilight; some person on Youtube made it Edward and Bella’s lullaby, and I don’t even think they used the original song, anyway.

  1000. Samkate
    Posted September 16, 2009 at 11:29 am

    “She can’t think of original names? what the heck? yeah because Jasper is an everyday name…and so is Esme” Jasper and Esme are not original names, they are just old fashioned names.

    I read Twilight and I used to like it before I realised how silly it is. Even while reading it I realised point 56 for myself. And how Bella has no personality.

    But some of your reasons where kind of stupid. If you wanted to make a real list about the real reasons people shouldn’t like Twilight, don’t mention T-Pain and don’t repeat the same points over.

  1001. LIV
    Posted September 18, 2009 at 2:39 am

    I realise you don’t like this book, and I respect your opinion.
    But, as a twilight fan myself, I think you need some help if you say you hate twilight so much then you spend ages writing a whole list about. Not to mention most points on the list are transparent and repeated. If you keep saying that the vampires are gay, then I would almost be thinking you have a crush on them. And what’s wrong with sparkling? How often have you dreamed about diamonds? Anyway, I hope at least some of my points make it through your thick head. GOOD LUCK!

  1002. shirley
    Posted September 18, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    jajajajajaja You really made my day! :D . . In my opinion, Twilight is a really boring and plotless piece of s… “a-r-t” xD. I couldn’t even finish reading the book, i just couldn’t.

  1003. HPrules!
    Posted September 19, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    I agree!! Especially on # 86!

  1004. Nina
    Posted September 20, 2009 at 3:40 am

    I like how it took me forever to actually get to the bottom of the page (referring to the bountiful comments; not my inability with the scroll bar).

    I chuckled when this person talked about the age difference.

    Must’ve taken a long time coming up with such a long list. Only because the book was so thought-provoking did you come up with 95 reasons to dislike it.

  1005. edwardisaflaminghomosexual
    Posted September 23, 2009 at 8:09 am

    this is so true. hormonal teenage saps may read this over and over and over at the risk of their brains vaporising, but not me, noooo way.

  1006. Posted September 23, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    I like this list, though I reckon I should’ve done this before you :S

    A lot of people seem to bash you about your redundancy and yet it is only 95 statements. Imagine all the twilight lovers reading I dunno 4 books of reading how good Edwards’ breath is in every page, looking into his eyes (every page), and the hole in her chest (NM) but yet find it difficult and take time to ‘humour’ you to read this ‘cos I mean HOW COULD YOU be redundant? Don’t you know that it is only acceptable to be redundant if you use ‘chagrin’ and ‘topaz’ and ‘wonderful’ in every other three words?!

    I took about 4 days to finish the series. It was candy, hollow candy. Nice on the outside and worthless in every other aspect.

    Oh and for those who can’t understand why someone who dislikes twilight would go through ALL the trouble to write 95 statements….well think of it like this…..a favour to everyone who doesn’t want to waste app 1 week of their lives reading twilight and saving their children (daughters) from getting a completely realistic IDEA of how mean are in the REAL world.

    Cheers mate(y)(s)

    I could go on….but I’ll be redundant cos I don’t intend to use any sparkles anytime soon.

  1007. dumbledore'sarmy
    Posted September 23, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    I love this list also! i totally agree with you potterwatch in saying that you should have done the list before!

    It is truly ridiculous when some people say that twilight is a piece of art even going as far to say that it is a literary masterpiece so much that one needs a dictionary to read the book! hellooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!! the most difficult word in the book was ‘chargrin’ since the rest of the series was occupied with the word ‘wonderful” and the ever popular phrase in NM ‘hole in the chest’. Oh yeah what a challenge! That truly gives the brain a workout!

    ( in case the twifans didn’t notice i was being sarcastic in the 2 previous sentences) LOL!

    The twilight series sucks and for those people who say that the person who created the list was being redundant, guess what! i guess you’re an expert at noticing redundancy since the twilight series is based on that concept.

    And of course i must mention that Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings are literary masterpieces since those novels actually consisted of a storyline which grew and developed with each book unlike some novels these days…..uhem… nuff said….

  1008. dead mike
    Posted September 24, 2009 at 12:00 am

    twilight is rubbish of the worst order, lestat would not even glance sideways at these third rate wannabees! i hope they do live forever so they can learn how lame they are!! anne rice should b!tch slap miss meyer back whatever gay writing school she half attended!

  1009. edwardisaflaminghomosexual
    Posted September 24, 2009 at 3:11 am

    hi, me again, the twilight books have replaced what should be a plot with a heap of adverb abuse and MY GOD THE FACE TOUCHING. twilight was just a way of meyer living out her deepest most intimate fantacies through the written word, for which i can never forgive her. if stupid little fangirls want to start wako cults worshiping sparkly vampires let them. i agree with the list completely but instead of waging a war on twilight fans why not just laugh and take the mick behind their backs eh????

  1010. Harry Potter Fan
    Posted September 24, 2009 at 8:26 am

    I have never read the books and I have no intention of either, and furthermore if a bunch of girls want to throw themselves at Robert Patterson due to the silly films let them it is all a bunch of rubbish. I totally agree with edwardisaflaminghomo

  1011. edwardisaflaminghomosexual
    Posted September 24, 2009 at 8:28 am

    poor robert

  1012. peeps
    Posted September 24, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    I’m sorry for the grammatical mistakes I could have made… but english is not my real lenguage so…

    and more little thing: ROBERT PATTINSON IS NOT HOT!! you wanna see some real hottie? GO TO THE BEACH! Surfers are way better than him, anywhere any gay is better than him!

    BYE!

  1013. Chaela
    Posted September 24, 2009 at 7:05 pm

    Wow, you really don’t have a life do you? I mean, first you write 95 reasons why you hate twilight, and then you refer to Chuck Norris as being better. I respect your opinion and some of the things you said made sense, but honestly, if you really hate Twilight, why would you take the time to write about it? I think someone’s a little too much like Bella… “Edward can’t read Bella’s mind because she doesn’t have one”. Well, you don’t either buddy! …My only advice is to find something more important to do if you are as smart as you think you are.

  1014. Chaela
    Posted September 24, 2009 at 7:10 pm

    …and no I am not a fan of Twilight either! Plus, the only reason I’m on this website is because I wanted to see how pathetic this was after my friends told me about it. I only left comments to let you guys no how truly retarded you are.

  1015. edwardisaflaminghomosexual
    Posted September 25, 2009 at 8:00 am

    c’mon, they’re entitled to an opinion!!!!!! We are here because silly fangirls are driving us insane, and we simply want to express our loathing of it. It is not as if we’re spending all day here ranting about how twilight sucks. We DO have better things to do.

  1016. Xela
    Posted September 25, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    I like number 18. Harry Potter is totally way better than Twilight. In fact, the majority of people who say Twilight is better than Harry Potter haven’t even read the books.

  1017. Posted September 26, 2009 at 4:54 am

    I love you for writing this. Thank you.

  1018. Posted September 26, 2009 at 11:48 pm

    UR A CREEP TEAM JACOB!!!1

  1019. Marieke
    Posted September 27, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    Hahaha. I totally need to go find where Stephen King wrote that Stephenie Meyer can’t write worth a damn!

  1020. bertie bott
    Posted September 27, 2009 at 10:14 pm

    wow., you’ve so much supporters in here. count me in. I have somehow read twilight and was stuck on book3. I just can’t turn to the next page, it’s turning me crazy. geez. I realized I was wasting time.

  1021. ~KitKat
    Posted September 28, 2009 at 3:58 am

    TWILIGHT ISN\’T WORTH A DARN.
    Whenever I tried to read it, I just couldn\’t. It\’s really boring and has no plot asforall.

    \”So Bella was a stupid and ugly girl, who lived in a town with her mom, then moved to a town with her dad, then saw her old friend with pathetically long hair who fell inlove with her, then got a car, then went to school and kept overusing a joke and everyone wanted to be her friend, but she saw a hot boy on a table and chose him over all. Then went to class with him, and farted, then smelled her hair and the hot guy ran away.\”

    That\’s all from the first chapters, don\’t you think? Instead of using \”original\” words and talking, talking, talking she could have just said it in a few sentences. And made it a personal journal, as somebody already mentioned , just changing vampires with human beings. If you can call THAT vampires.

  1022. *iNnEr GoaLeR* Galaactic foootball (::
    Posted September 28, 2009 at 4:04 am

    yo peeps! xx
    so im a gal , 14, jamaica (:
    and im a pretty weird one . ;
    i still watch kiddish cartoons,sing kiddish songs and stuffies;.
    but ofcourse im also a young adult so im a big fan of stephen king as4a =0
    and i agreee wif him 100% .
    ’causecausecause.
    im a huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge fan (:
    so just because he read the book .
    and said its poorley writtan (:
    i decided to read it ahswels
    and
    THAT.
    BOOK.
    IS.
    SO
    BOREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENG D:

    as for the movie……………..
    GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

    aha. im waiting for your hate comments on lemonsandlimes@hotmail.com . if you’re twilight fans, add me and swear at me ((: i cant wait !!
    and if u r stephen king / harry potter / lord of the ring fans . . . . ADD ON RIGHT AWAY AND LETS CHAAAAAAT!!!!!!! =)

    Twilight isn’t wortha darN~!

    ‘Nuff said .

  1023. darkemina
    Posted September 28, 2009 at 4:18 am

    Here is what I understood from Twilight!

    Bella: My life sucks so much! I chose to move to a stupid town in Washington which I hate. My dad is generous and caring and does everything for me, but I will just call him by his first name cause he’s obviously such a jerk.
    First Day Of High School: Hi!
    Bella: SMURF you I hate you.
    First Day Of High School: :(
    Eric: Hi I’m a nice person! But I have oily hair and pimples.
    Bella: Ew. Go away.
    Edward: *flury glare out of nowhere*
    Bella: Oh my god who is he?
    Girl who Bella doesn’t deem important enough to remember: Too pretty to date, aka Edward.
    Bella: Oh my god he is so pretty. We should be soulmates. He’s albinos just like me only I’m not albino and I’m overusing that horrible horrible joke!
    Girl who is suddenly named Jessica: I must agree!

    Class.
    Bella: But my hair smells like strawberries! :*(
    Edward: You’re icky.
    Mike: Hi I’m Mike and we have the next class together!
    Bella: Oh ew. Edward’s prettier than you.
    Mike: He hates you tough. If I were lucky to sit next to you, I would have proposed marria–err, talked to you.
    Bella: Whatever, nerd.

    Edward: I don’t like this stinky chick and would like to switch classes.
    Bella: But I love you!
    Edward: Smurf this you’re here.

    Haha I was well bored (:

  1024. Posted September 28, 2009 at 4:20 am

    you all retardid twilight foreva!

  1025. ~KitKat
    Posted September 28, 2009 at 4:22 am

    The post above proves that every Twilight fan has problems with the grammar.

    Haha and I agree with you! (Darkemina and *iNnEr GoaLeR*)

  1026. Posted September 28, 2009 at 4:24 am

    you dar say such a thing about us twilit fans
    atleast we r better we r fans not haters
    you the hatesr
    if u dont like it dont read it

  1027. ~KitKat
    Posted September 28, 2009 at 4:27 am

    Actually m’dear why don’t you look back and take your own advice. You’re the one reading this. You’re the one who obviously searched “I hate Twilight” on Google, Yahoo, ICQ Search etc, to find this and rant at the fans.
    And you knew that you won’t like it.
    Because you’re a Twilight fan.
    And we read Twilight because we thought that we are gonna like it? But we don’t. This is Internet. This is a free world! We can say whatever we want to.
    Aha yup yes.

  1028. Posted September 28, 2009 at 4:31 am

    well u r rite sorry
    i was kinda mean n rude
    well i sorry
    n im not a huuuuge fan of it but i am a big er fan!
    so i got mad and angry

  1029. Temptatioon!
    Posted September 28, 2009 at 4:33 am

    Twilight is very stupid!

    Go read some real books/watch some real movies/listen to some real music.

    Yes.

  1030. teska
    Posted September 28, 2009 at 6:35 am

    i would just like to point out that if you do like twilight and you have commented on this page then mabey you actually dont like twilight or you are just obsessed with annoying people that dont like twilight. As someone else said on this page you dont see us sabotaging your “we love twilight sights.”

    Also i know i have made spelling/gramma mistakes in this comment but i am in a hurry.

    -teska

  1031. Jack B-A
    Posted September 28, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    Twilight sucks, sorry Jessy :) x
    I also agree with EVERY point :D

  1032. Jessica Brennan
    Posted September 28, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    yeah, that really did pwn me.

  1033. Mak
    Posted September 28, 2009 at 7:16 pm

    twilight is horrible mills and boon RUBBISH

  1034. Disenchanted
    Posted September 29, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    Amen. Everyone of these are true. She CANNOT WRITE! It’s insulting that she even still tries.
    Twilight is the emodies all that is wrong with the idiociy of society today.
    Besides, Edward is just creepy and she said he was like a greek god about thousand times.

  1035. Kim
    Posted September 29, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    Jessica B,

    Just because Stephine Meyers can go to babynames.com or whatever and pick out unquie names does not mean her characters are well developed at all. Just because J.K. Rowling has maybe not too orginial of first names does not mean that she is not good at what she does. I do not read Harry Potter yet I respect the woman a great deal for all she has done. Come on, her names are pretty kick ass Sirius Black, Bellatrix Lestrange, Severus Snape? The list goes on and on. Some of those names are just fun to say, too. I thought that Rowling came up with way more interesting names, plots and character development than anything Meyers wrote.

    Who asked whoever wrote this to read Twilight? Better yet, who asked you to read 95 reasons why she hates Twilight? You are being pretty hypocritical about the whole “why be a critic? Stop slamming yadda yadda” when that is all you are doing right now.

    Meyers got lucky and wrote the right book at the right time. That does not mean she is a good at what she does–really, she has a poor writing skill, it’s not poetic at all, it’s not interesting to read, it’s an easy read, really, and consists of almost nothing but talking–nor that any of her characters are well developed beyond physical apperances. If someone can’t take critisim then there is NO reason why they should write a book. People make a living out of critizing a book. Duh. Everyone, no matter how grand or poor of a writer they may be, will get critism.

    Everyone has free will to say what they want, when they want, just like you do.

  1036. lala
    Posted September 29, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    I agree with the pedophile,Jasper and Alice,Gay Vampire and ‘Does not hook up with Jacob even tho he was there for her and was the man anyone could ask for just because Edward is so damn sexy’ parts

  1037. lala
    Posted September 29, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    oooh and also with the ‘Can’t read her mind because she does not have one’ and mary sue and original names one

  1038. Jennifer
    Posted September 30, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    This List is so Funny.
    I never even heard of Twilight until the Movie came out, Twilight isn\’t as Big as Harry Potter here in England, Thank Goodness. Out of all my friends only one has read the books and is obsessed with it, me and her always debate about Twilight and Harry Potter, she\’s always dissing Harry Potter and she hasn\’t even read the Book, and I can\’t really diss the Twilight Books, cause I havent read it, and I dnt want to after watching the Film and reading this site, but it won\’t stop me from criticising the Film. I watched the film to see what all the Hype is about because it\’s so big in America, and guess what, I HATED IT, I have never seen a film with so much Hype being so Disappointing, one word to describe the Film CRAP.
    Am sorry to all the Twilight Fans, but really, you lot think Twilight is Good. The relationship between Bella and Edward is Whack, yeah sure Girls would love a guy as beautiful, handsome, caring, loving and protective as Edward, but from what I saw in the Films and what I hear and read from people, its like Edward treats Bella like a child. From what I saw in the Film, the chemistry between Edward (Robert) and Bella (Kristen) was not Good at all, basically there was no chemistry. I read up Stephanie Meyer\’s fantasy cast, maybe it would have worked with her fantasy cast, but I really didn\’t like the film.
    And why is it that a British Guy played Edward, Am British, so dnt get me wrong, its good seeing British ppl making it in Hollywood, But I think an American should have played Edward, if Hayden Christensen was younger, I think he would have made a Brilliant Edward, I know am saying all this and havnt read the book, but if they wanted a Handsome guy, then Hayden Fits perfectly, In my Opinion Robert Pattinson is not handsome. Stephanie Meyer\’s fantasy (ideal) Edward is Henry Cavill, a British Actor, who couldn\’t play Edward because he didn\’t look like a 17 year old anymore, well neither does Robert, frankly he looks old. Anyway if Stephanie Meyer wanted British actors to play Edward why didnt she make Edward British, I think its ridiculous, Atleast J K Rowling made Harry Potter British and she wanted the cast to be British.
    I read up that Stephanie Meyer really wanted Henry Cavill to be in the film and he was then cast as Carlisle Cullen, but his schedule clashed with the Tudors. How can her ideal Edward, who is better looking than Robert Pattinson (if I may add), play Carlisle in the film and only Edward should be the most Handsome guy, and if Henry Cavill was cast as Carlisle Cullen then he would have been more handsome than Edward, so how would that have worked, if no one is meant to be as Good Looking as Edward, Cause Henry Cavill is way better looking than Robert Pattinson, Duh.
    I think that Stephanie wrote Twilight because its her fanasy to have a guy as beautiful as Edward cause she\’s not all that beautiful, I read up somewhere aswell that she based Bella on herself, thats weird, cause that for sure tells us that the book is her fantasy to have a guy who stays 17 forever, one word, ew, speacially with how old she is, and if she sees Henry Cavill as her Edward, he should be scared, lol.
    And to those who diss Harry Potter, you lot don\’t know literary masterpieces even if it hit you in the head. Cause Harry Potter is up there with all the other British Literate, such as …
    The Lord of the Rings Trilogy, The Narnia Books, Shakepeares plays, all of who are British and Stepahnie Meyer is American she can never compare to J K Rowling.
    P.S. I think Stephen King Rocks aswell.

  1039. Ryan L
    Posted October 2, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    Check out this funny Haiku this guy wrote on his Blog about Twilight. I couldn’t stop laughing. http://tipsbybigdave.wordpress.com/

  1040. Twilight is overrated
    Posted October 3, 2009 at 3:35 am

    BAHAHA THIS IS THE BEST!! I hate twilight, I have read all of them and have to say I agree with every single point on this list! I have a website for twilight haters! everyone should join if you hate it! I hate bella cullen sooo much….ughhhh and I hate edward so dont say i hate bella cause im jealous of her…better her than me! buahaha

  1041. Posted October 3, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    That book is a disgrace to true vampires(i.e.Dracula,Mr.Han{from the manga STEP},etc) and if ANY Twitards threaten to kill me with their “vampire powers”,I will personally stalk you so I may write your name in my Death Note.*goes into a fit of maniacal laughter*

  1042. Matthews
    Posted October 4, 2009 at 12:30 am

    Reason number 18 leads me to believe this came from the mind of an upset HP fan… >.>

  1043. Winter
    Posted October 4, 2009 at 3:58 am

    Being a native to Washington state, I think I have suffered the greatest injustices caused by these horrible books. They offer Twilight Tours around the Olympic Penninsula, and have opened Twilight themed shops in various towns. I see cars with “Twilight road trip” written on the back, and I want to rear-end them. I have been living here my entire life. I’ve been through Forks on numerous occasions, and there is NO POSSIBLE REASON anyone should go there unless driving past it to see the rainforest. So the fact that teenage girls from across the country are actually spending money to go there? Good lord. The economy here is booming. I’ve actually been present where girls, clutching their copies of Twilight in hand, have whispered to one another, “this isn’t anything like the book…” That’s because Washington is a real place, jerks. PEOPLE LIVE HERE, AND YOU’RE RUINING OUR LIVES. I’ve read the series. I hated the series. It has ruined a lot of what is good about being a Washingtonian, and the paranormal. You can’t mention vampires or werewolves anymore without a Twilight reference somewhere. I can honestly say that if I could go back in time, I fly to Utah and kill Stephenie Meyer before this monster of hers could be written. She can ruin her own state if she wants to, but not mine.

  1044. kelly
    Posted October 4, 2009 at 9:03 am

    hey, im a twilight fan, too & im not gonna kick your ass with my twilight powers? & i get that you dont like the book okay but the only reason you hate it is because of the poeple that are obsessed with it, yeah i admit we can get annoying. & somew of these are true, but it doesn’t mean you have to trash meyer because of us.

  1045. Emily~
    Posted October 4, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    I will have your babies. Thank you for this list, I lol’d. I loved the one that said “She had only been in Forks for a month when Edward had been watching her sleep for two months.” I read the first book when I was younger (12ish) and never noticed that. I lol’d. Hard.

  1046. Ani
    Posted October 5, 2009 at 4:44 am

    Just putting it out there– We got bored one day and set the novel on fire.

    Back in the day, before people became IN LOVE with the fictional character Edward, before all magazines spoke about the Twilight phonomenem .. i actually liked it . So dont critise me saying I went out and bought the book just to burn it.
    Another thing that gets me is the little fan girls who actually think Edward is real — like the writers of them comments above. If you love twilight so much, why did you come on this page? Does anyone really care about how much you want to do Edward? FYI, no, and the writer is free to express his opinon on how stupid it is. Cause you totally have vamparic powers.
    And, although I have nothing against Harry Potter fans, Im abit sick of Twihaters being associated with people who love harry potter. I dont love harry potter, i just hate twilight.
    Excuse the poor grammar.

  1047. Ani
    Posted October 5, 2009 at 4:58 am

    My apologies, she not he.

  1048. Becca
    Posted October 5, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    Omigosh! I totally LOVE Twilight! It doesn’t really have a plot, so the story is so easy to follow. Besides, who needs a plot anyway? And the characters don’t have a personality, but then again, character development is so ten years ago!

    Also! I adored how Bella’s power was a Shield, because hey! Who really wants to have suspense and twists in the little bit of plot Meyer decided to thrown in?

    OMGEE! Reneesme is such a pretty name! Harry Potter totally should have named his daughter Mollilly. It would have been sooo cute!

    And… And! Any teenage mother would absolutely love her baby, even though it was eating her from the inside out, and the one-hundred-and-eight-year old undead father had to rip open her uterus – with his teeth! No fangs! – to save her from their demon spawn. (It’s just so romantic!)

    And stupid Jacob, with his “personality” and his “wanting Bella to actually be safe.” His only redeeming quality is the fact that he goes all pedophile on Nessie.

    There needs to be more supernatural pedophiles in all books!

    Yay! Go Twilight!

    P.S. Sparkling vampires make great disco balls!

  1049. ki
    Posted October 5, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    Goodness this list makes me rather happy :3

    Pretty much as soon as they came out with the 9 million twilight purses/bags/shirts ect… i vowed to never touch it o.o

    it killed vampires and made them ‘cool’….. oh dear…

    anne rice vampys for teh win :3

    .. the only good thing though.. *Kind of* is that its helping out the forks economy :P …. SADLY people are actually going there… just to see the setting of this book… ever been to forks? NOTHING there…. jeeeeez…..

  1050. Blood-Lust
    Posted October 6, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    I love the twilight saga. It may not be the most well written book of the decade, but it has made girls all over the world think ‘do I really love him or am I just a love sick teenager?’

    I am a 100% Twihard fan/fangirl/fanpire… whatever you want to call me but it doesn’t mean I resort to violence when someone says they don’t like the saga. One of my best mates hates the saga, you don’t see me running after her with a beseball bat do you? No! didn’t think so. Yeah I may go all ‘twilight mentle’ to wind her up a bit, but she does the same to me with Ashes To Ashes. Big woop.

    I think the biggest point you made that annoyed me though was the one about how it was just another case of forbidden love. Isn’t Romeo and Juliet forbidden love? You don’t see people going around posting 95 reasons why they hate that, do you?

    Twiight fans can use proper capitilization, many have proved that. I believe I havn’t missed one capital letter out on this post, so meh. O_o.

    No one is forcing you to read the books so why is it having such a big affect in your life? Teenage girls fall at the feet of R. Patz… wow. Taylor Lautner gets rampaged by a group of Twi-hards… amazing. Someone gets threatened by a slightly over-reacting fanpire… big woop. I don’t see how the reaction of fans affects the quality of the book.

    Well, I think thats all of my chest now… so, hope you enjoy your evening.

    P.S. By the way… theres not ment to be a capital letter after a ‘…’ just thought I might let you know before you try to contradict me!

  1051. Mimo
    Posted October 6, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    Lol #39. xD I did read the complete series, don’t hit me. xD :]

  1052. Kayla
    Posted October 6, 2009 at 10:14 pm

    I think Twilight is very well writen. GOSH ppl can have their own options in life so please don’t offend anybody. Everybody has their life dreams and what they love. Ok?

  1053. Jeff
    Posted October 7, 2009 at 11:36 am

    I have one thing to say to the writer of this blog. You misused “i.e.” in the fortieth reason why you don’t like the ‘Twilight’ series. You should have used “et al” instead. “I.e.” is used when listing inanimate objects to give examples, whereas “et al” is the proper use for listing people. Oh, and one more thing. Millions of people around the world have bought Stephanie Meyers’ books. How many have you sold? You should get off of your soapbox and just leave it be, lest someone come and bitch slap you with your own grammatical error.

  1054. Twilight=NotTrue2theVampireMythology
    Posted October 7, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    WOW, Twilight fans are so defensive, Didnt know it was a crime to have an opinion, Bloody Hell.
    I’ve never Read the Twilight books, but I’ve heard that Stephanie Meyer, or whoever she is, didnt give the Book’s Vampires Fangs, cause she didnt understand it, whats not to understand they suck blood and they need fangs to pierce through the skins/veins/arteries to such the blood, having no Fangs means they are not Vampires. When I heard that the Vampires in the Twilight books didnt have fangs, I just knew that the Books would disappoint me, so I can actually say I will never read the Twilight Saga, cause I know I would hate it, I saw the film and thought it was really bad, I kept thinking that I had wasted like 2 hours of my life watching such a Bad film.
    As a Brit what really annoys me is that Twilight fans signed a Petition not to have Robert Pattinson as Edward and now they’re like, ‘OMG, I Love Robert Pattinson’, How 2 faced are the Twilight fans. I don’t like Robert Pattinson, but that was really sad on him, having a petition against him and now you love him. By the way You all love Robert Pattinson, Why? There are more Handsome Looking and Beautiful English guys than Robert Pattinson, for example, Henry Cavill, Ben Barnes (My Number 1 Guy), Alex Pettyfer (By the way, He’s going to be in a Film with Vanessa Hudgens, Called ‘Beastly’, it’s based on a Book), Tom Felton, Ed Westwick, > (the list can go on). Am really Happy for Robert Pattinson, but I don’t find him Handsome, at all, but safe to say I did kinda like his Character in Harry Potter and he did play a good ‘Cedric Diggory’ in the 4th Harry Potter film, but he wasnt good in Twilight though. Anyway please dont Hate, its just my opinion and am expressing them.

  1055. Sez
    Posted October 7, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    Say and Em

    I don’t agree with you about Twilight, I love it. And I am not a young girl, I am 36. But that is ok, we can have different opinions like you say because the world would be boring if we all thought along the same lines.

    I do however, have a problem with the crazed, immature, unstable screaming pathetic fan girls that this saga has created … these imbeciles clog up the eclipse & new moon websites with pages upon pages of utter crap using stupid names like Team Leg Hitch. Some of these fans are grown women and spend all night on their PCs wittering on endlessly. It was embarrassing to read,, they should be embarrassed to write it. It is little wonder the actors run away from their fans.

    But wow….it’s pretty scarey to think there are so many bunny boilers out there in this world.

    I won’t be checking back here but im sure ill receive some responses from some crazy wench as i got kicked off the eclipse and new moon websites for telling a few people to get a grip on themselves.

  1056. Andrea
    Posted October 7, 2009 at 10:19 pm

    This couldn’t be better…I read part of the first book, but I didn’t like it at all, every page of the book was so redundant and predictable, the story is cliché, cheesy, just made for teen girls and with no intention to get any other kind of fans. I watched the movie and it was kinda better than the book but still sucked. I don’t consider it good literature and I don’t think it should be considered a competition to the HP series…since JK Rowling is a REAL genius , unlike Stephanie Meyer who writes like a teen girl would write her diary.

  1057. Jasmine
    Posted October 8, 2009 at 12:12 am

    Andrea… i think you will find the Twilight Saga has a lot more fans than just stalker teenage girls..

  1058. T
    Posted October 8, 2009 at 11:13 am

    The list and the comment-war being left below are equally as funny :P

  1059. Posted October 8, 2009 at 11:47 am

    OMG,I loved it!I hate twillight!Your reasons are sooo good!I´m you´re biggest fan!!!THANX for making this!For Twillight fans:Sorry,but we are allowed to have an oppenion too!We accept you,so please do the same!Just read this horrible books,dream about “perfect Edward”,and buy you clothes like Bella,so you´ll look more ugly than now!!

  1060. Blood-Lust
    Posted October 8, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    ClaireBennet… the twilight fans havn’t been accepted, or half this guys reasons wouldn’t be about fans and how they react!!! I know you’re entitled to your opinion but it doesn’t mean you can be like that about it. Some of the grief we get, from guys like this is unbelieveable… oh and btw we don’t go around bying clothes like Bella’s… not most of us anyway.

    some people might think this is an over reaction… but to be honest i couldn’t care less… you Anti-twihards need to loosen up a bit on the real rans and ACTUALLY accepth them… hate to breake it to you, but your outnumbered… by a LOT!!!

  1061. le engineer
    Posted October 8, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    1 name, robert pattinson. ‘nuf said!

  1062. OMG
    Posted October 9, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    Why I think it\’s hilerous and most of the people on here need to grow up. If you\’re a twilight fan why are you reading this it\’s common sense. If youe going to get upset don\’t read it. And if I can say. I\’m a teenager and thnk the books are terrible. And it\’s written for my age so I can judge.

  1063. Elle
    Posted October 9, 2009 at 10:11 pm

    I’m so happy I found this. I went on little rants about how stupid the books are all the time! I could even add a couple of reasons to your list.
    First of all, just structure-wise, Stephenie Meyes is an awful writer because she tries to show Edward’s emotions by describing him through Bella’s eyes. She’ll be like… “a look flashed across his face that showed pain and some deeper emotion” blablabla that just allows the reader to know EXACTLY how Edward feels, but she can’t do that with the perspective she’s chosen! The reader is still inside Edward’s head while he should be difficult to understand due to the perspective… that would make the books more interesting and give them at least SOME depth.

    Second of all, the books are SEXIST?! Bella is ALWAYS cooking and washing and cleaning, while Charlie and the other men don’t know how to do anything, and all the women in Twilight are TINY and the men are HUGE and she depicts it as if that’s how it should be. Also, Bella’s always crying and whining, and Edward always catches her and carries her which just makes me mad as a woman. What image is she trying to create of girls?! Bella has like 4 empty months when Edward leaves. What, she has no personality AT ALL? I’ve been with my boyfriend for a year, and i really love him, but if he were to leave me, then i wouldn’t just give up on life! Are girls really so weak and helpless they’ll collapse without their boyfriend?

    Third of all, Stephenie Meyer TRIED to create a perfect, selfless character but utterly failed. Bella is incredibly selfish. She’s supposed to care about other people right? Then why, in “New Moon”, when Charlie tells her about all the killed hikers and Bella knows it was Victoria, why does she worry about herself instead of realizing those exact people are dead because of HER? And come on, she she couldn’t have treated Jacob any worse. All she EVER thinks about is herself, her pain. Stephenie is trying to make Jessica sound like a bad person, but who would NOT be mad when your friend first completely forgets about you and ignores you, then asks you for a favor by going to the movies, then potentially endangers your life by walking up to men that could have been bad!

    Plus about the unoriginal names, I totally agree. Most of the characters she just named after family, and the other names are just so… obvious. Old Italian names? Caius, Aro, and Marcus. WOW she’s incredible.

    And it feels like a personal insult to say Twilight is as good as “Harry Potter”. I mean, really…

    Then, Bella’s power? The shield? So 4 loooong books build up to this climactic battle, and NOTHING happens because Bella both has the power to have it all under control as a vampire, AND to just protect everyone around her? At least JK Rowling had the guts to kill some of her characters. Plus, that power to control herself? Just when the books could have had one thing interesting.

    It also sounds like Stephenie Meyer didn’t have enough people telling her that she’s beautiful, or that brown is beautiful, because isn’t it strange that her beautiful character has long brown hair and brown eyes, just like her? And that Edward says that brown IS beautiful? It’s like writing a book to compliment yourself.

    And, just to add to her own fantasy and that of her fans, all the clothing? Especially in the fourth book? Come ON there are no conflicts, no complications, all that fashion and her HUGE diamond necklace doesn’t add to the books in any way but only makes it more materialistic and just one big girlish fantasy.

    The only reason I read all four books was that when I start a series, I’ll just have to finish it. I guess I kept hoping something would change. Anyway, I laughed a lot reading them, and lets go to 100 reasons! Or a 1000! :)

    I have no problem with anyone that likes the books, some of my friends do, but I personally have a lot of problems with them. Not only because they are exceptionally badly written, but because the ethics are just ALL WRONG.

  1064. Elle
    Posted October 9, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    By the way, at first I thought that Jessica Brennan was being reasonable, and yes, no one forced people to read the books, and no, we don’t need to be “nasty” about Stephenie Meyer, and I’m sorry if it sounded like i was being nasty, but THEN… No need to be nasty right? I’m glad you practiced what you preached because we were all waiting for Americans to be insulted. I’m European, not American, but that’s crossing the line.

  1065. Stacey
    Posted October 10, 2009 at 6:01 am

    Twilight is the worst thing I have ever read.I mean seriously characters aren’t meant to admit they are dumb (see book three breaking dawn for reference).Plus fully grown men aren’t meant to have dimples either(emmett).The hardest word in the twilight book was like enuniciate which is a level of a 6th grader.When the cullen’s are first introducted bella says that Edward is more boyish what are emmett and jasper,Stephanie Meyer seems to have a interest for disturbing acts eg.almost two people get raped,there are countless pheopiles,two-timers etc.A five year old could write a better book.Edward also refers to Bella as a drug and she just makes out with him in response instead of standing up for herself .Where is the respect women have battled for for centuries and a stupid book reenforces that men are gods.Edward or any other of the characters have no other characteristic definements other than shallowness or perfectionisim or daftness.Twilight also promotes skipping school and classes as almost very main character does at one point.

  1066. Rebecca
    Posted October 10, 2009 at 6:16 am

    Stephanie Meyer needs to let go of her characters BADLY.Jacob should have left and charlie should not be around when she is a vampire.How lame she skipped her’new born’ stage propbably would have been the only interesting thing in the series but no perfect Bella skips the new born stage.Maybe she didn’t have enough literacy skills to describe it because reading the twilight saga certainly convinces you of that.Renesmee shouldn’t have been born,nothing could of stuffed up the plot more,if she had to be alive couldn’t she have a decent name atleast instead of having a pheopile BF who just had to a big part of the story again because SM couldn’t let go.And to make it worse Edward finally can read bella’s mind which was propbably the only flaw in his ‘perfection’.Mostly all the good characters she insults.In the movie she called it her baby(the twilight series)but reality flash millions of people hate it and aren’t falling for the ‘my life’s not perfect so I’m going to fall in love with a non-existent pheopile’ trap that stephanie meyer has formed.

  1067. chelsea
    Posted October 10, 2009 at 6:20 am

    Blood-lust..we may be out-numbered but we actually have real points and statements and don’t fall for the crap stephaine Meyer wrote

  1068. Adele Power
    Posted October 10, 2009 at 8:06 am

    A lot of what your saying is true, but a lot of what your saying is not true or not completely true. For example, 4 is completely false; Bella was trying to see Edward by doing dangerous SPORTS. She was stupid not suicidal, and just because she could have died doesn’t mean she wanted to.

  1069. Posted October 12, 2009 at 7:27 am

    Adele Power,Ok,then he didn´t try to kill herself,but she is even stupider,because hearing voicesw,and seeing faces,when they aren´t there,is not normal.That means that Bella is a psycho.
    Elle,you´re not nasty wity with Mrs.Meyer,and you´re reasons,and this thing with Jessica,are true.

  1070. Controversial
    Posted October 14, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    When I first read the book, Twilight, I thought it was alright; a bit slow-paced, but alright. However, after reading New Moon, Eclipse, and Breaking Dawn, I felt that little “Go Twlight!” flame inside of me get smaller and smaller, eventually dying out.

    I have no right to diss people who have different opinions than I do (and I’ve practically wasted a hour reading this entire list of comments), but… Seriously. I hate it when people mention “oh, well, Meyer’s books sold really well, so it’s a lot better than you’ll ever be able to do.” Honestly, I think that’s bull. So what if her books sold well? That has nothing to do with whether you can have your own opinion or not.

    Sigh.

    …Books are written for people to read just for fun, so spouting all this controversy over whether Twilight is a good or bad read isn’t really that practical. If you read it and liked it, that’s great. If you read it and hated it, that’s okay, too. What’s the point of spreading the hate (though personally, I’m a anti-Twilight fan here)? Just have fun and friggin’ read.

    -Sissy

  1071. Blood-Lust
    Posted October 15, 2009 at 11:36 am

    Chelsea, I hate to break it to you but not all our reasons are total crap about falling for fictional characters. The books are fun to read; though maybe a bit cliché, (SP) are interesting; and I liked the way the Volturi just left because they were scared they would loose; yeah the books may not be written briliantly but does it really matter? If people like them its fine, right? Anti-fans may have good reasons as well, but the reasons losted here aren’t, most of them are repeated, just written differently, and the rest are just a load of crap. Bella didn’t try to kill her self, she took up extream sports to hear Edwards voice, ‘this makes her carzy then!’ I hear you say, well theoretically it doesn’t, she says its like her subconcious mind knows he still cares for her or something along those lines, if you actually read the book with an open mind, and not just read it to find faults with it, most of the statements made my Sarah are contradicted.

    Yeah Twi-Fans can get a bit protective but thats because some people just make up total crap about the books to piss us off. Yes, some may get a bit agressive sometimes, but again, hate to breake it to you but THATS A STERIOTYPE!!!!! Not all twilight fans are like that, yeah some are but I find it quite rude to think that you can judge millions of people on the few that have been mentioned.

    Blood-Lust

  1072. RobRum
    Posted October 16, 2009 at 5:30 am

    Blood-Lust you carry on like one of the fans you claim is the STERIOTYPE!!!!!
    “Anti-fans may have good reasons as well, but the reasons losted here aren’t, most of them are repeated” as a fan of this series you should like to have things repeated over and over and over again.
    with an open mind, when bella takes up extreme sports to hear Eddie she is hurting herself. she feels like crap after her hulicinations but keeps doing it over and over and over….instead of just being with Jacob who made her happy when she was with him. she acts crazy. i was pulling for the extreme sports but i knew she wasnt going to die because there were 4 books.
    and how smart was it for them to not take out the Volturi? they should have since they are going to go after them one by one later.
    when you grow up someday you will see these books for what they are and realize what you were for being so nutz over them. or you will never grow up and act like you didnt get a pony for your 12th birthday.

  1073. Blood-Lust
    Posted October 16, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    Hate to burst your bubble RobRum, but have you even met any of the fans that make the rest of us seem like crazy teenage girls? well I have and they are so much worse than me. They will resort to violence if the books are insulted. They will scream and shout at people who don’t like the books, but I’m not like that, I am just stating my opinion like many of you are, I’m just putting my point across with more force and evidence that most of the Anti-Twihards. I have real points to make, not just prejudised comments about how all fans fall at the feet of R-Patz and Taylor Lautner.

    “as a fan of this series you should like to have things repeated over and over and over again.” This is just your opinion but again, hate to break it to you, but the ‘a’ is meant to be a capital letter. That was another point made by someone, that Twilight fans can’t use capital letters, well neither can you RobRum, you only used 16 (maybe 17) capital letters and 9 of them were misused. I on the other hand, can use capital letters, as I have proved so again that is a steriotype. I hate it when people are hipocritical like that, they say that Twilight fans can’t use capital letters and other things like that, but then go do that themselves… I just hate it.

    And yet again, you saying “when you grow up someday you will see these books for what they are and realize what you were for being so nutz over them. or you will never grow up and act like you didnt get a pony for your 12th birthday.” I’m not going to even bother pointing out the mistakes in this quote. This is an assumption. How do you know what I will do when I grow up? The answer… you don’t, so you saying that is just so annoying.

    So I will either grow up or act like I didn’t get a Pony for my 12th birthday… what a choice. Personally I want to act like I didn’t get a Pony for my 12th birthday. I would rather do that than stop reading the books any day.

    If I was you RobRum, I would find out all the facts before you go around making assumpitons.

    Blood-Lust

  1074. Victoria
    Posted October 16, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    First of all, what is job title? Are you a book publisher, eiditor, or reveiwer? Are you a writer? because i dont see you writing anything better. You contradict yourself so much. Number one and two were about how bella is the perfect character, yet several times after that you say she is plain and boring. I agree with you on seven points but you are tearing every little detail apart, the book is meant to be a fictional fantasy. you should just learn to enjoy it or go live in a cave because there is no way to escape the wave of twilight fever going around

  1075. cocoa
    Posted October 17, 2009 at 10:00 am

    ohh wow
    i didn’t even read the book and still don’t like it
    haha you made my day though
    ohh and harry potter sucks too ;)

  1076. rosabella
    Posted October 17, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    if u freakin hate twilight then y did u read it? u no u loved it, u just want publicity.loser

  1077. Elle
    Posted October 18, 2009 at 11:36 am

    Yeah we know we loved it, JUST because we read it. How can we know we hate it if we don’t read it? You’d be complaining criticizing without having read the book. Plus the reason Twilight is a bestseller is that it’s a girly fantasy with no real conflict. Not everyone could read disturbing books that linger on your mind and make you think months after you’ve finished reading them. Does it mean that, just because not everyone can read such books, the Twilight books are better? I don’t think so. And Blood-Lust, I think it’s a little bit HYPOCRITICAL to insult RobRum’s writing if your own is filled with mistakes.

    Of course everyone can voice their opinion, but why would you read this list if you love Twilight when its title is “95 reasons why should never read twilight (…)”? I don’t mind having a discussion but the only thing the Twilight lovers come up with is “Bella did NOT try to kill herself!” and it gets tiring to explain that no, she didn’t, but some exaggeration is okay! The list is also supposed to be FUNNY you know. People that hate Twilight can just say it here because that is the point of this page. So it’s going to happen.

  1078. Blood-Lust
    Posted October 18, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Elle, how is my own writing full of mistakes? I would like to know, because all I can see it that I missed one capital letter.

  1079. Elle
    Posted October 18, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    - “(…) scared they would loOse (…)”
    Loose means something totally different than losing something or someone, so it should be “lose”.
    - “(…) may not be written briliantly (…)”
    It’s supposed to be brilliantly.
    - “If people like them its fine, right?”
    It should be “it’s”.
    - I think when you said the reasons “losted here” you just made a typing mistake so whatever.
    - “Bella didn’t try to kill her self (…)”
    They’re not separate words, it should be “herself”.
    - “(…) she took up extream sports (…)”
    EXTREME.
    - “This makes her carzy then!”
    That’s probably just a typing mistake again.
    - “(…) like her subconcious mind (…)”
    It should be “subconscious”.
    - “(…) but thats because some (…)”
    That is, so “that’s”.
    - “(…) some may get a bit agressive (…)”
    AGGRESSIVE
    - (…) hate to breake it to you (…)”
    BREAK
    - (…) but THATS (…)”
    That is, so “that’s”.
    - “STERIOTYPE!!!”
    SterEotype.

    And that’s just your first post out of the two I read. Do you want me to correct your other one? Well, I’ll name one, it not “prejudised”, it’s “prejudiced”. Have you read “Pride and Prejudice?” It’s a whole lot better, maybe you should try it.

    Anyway, that’s not even what it’s about, I don’t care if anyone makes mistakes, but it’s just not really fair to try to insult someone else because they do, when you do too. And I’m not trying to insult you, I just wanted to point that out. And believe me, I know not all Twilight fans are the same because everyone has their own mind. Some girls I really like also read and like the books, and I still think they’re intelligent and genuinely nice people. But, like I said, this list wasn’t written to be entirely accurate, it was partly written to amuse! So don’t feel personally insulted. I just really strongly dislike the books because I think they’re degrading to girls. So it’s not that I’m on here because I have a petty dislike just because I think the extreme fangirls are weird, I actually have moral issues with the books.

  1080. Elle
    Posted October 18, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    Ha, now I made a typing error. It’s not “prejudised”, it’s “prejudiced, sorry.

  1081. Bri
    Posted October 18, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    Twilight does suck, and most everyone can come up with many reasons to discount it as a novel. Be that as it may, there are loads of other reasons for its literary failure besides the fact that Bella and Edward are horrible characters. That fact makes up more than 3/4 of your reasons. If you think Twilight is repetitive (which it is), take a good hard look at your answers one more time.
    While the list is amusing, it’s almost ironic how whiny it is and how much you talk about Bella being a whiny git.
    Despite the huge amount of focus on the main characters, you did come up with some really good points, like how Jasper and Alice were hardly developed. I also loved the points on the extreme fangirls, I can’t stand those ingrates.

  1082. Blood-Lust
    Posted October 19, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    Elle, I realise this is meant to amusing, but it just annnoys me that people have the guts to be prejudiced, about how ALL fangirls are like that. I know I’m not the best example, because now you have pointed my many mistakes out I can see alot more, but my point still stands, prejudiced coments get people know where in life.

    Bri, I think the reason Alice and Jaspers relationship isn’t developed more, is because the story is based on Edward and Bella. I think we do find out how close the two are though, through what Alice says to Bella on the way to Italy, and when she leaves in Breaking Dawn.

    Blood-Lust

  1083. mouse
    Posted October 19, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    wow. i read the list. i wanted to comment. and then i scrolled… and scrolled… and – well you get what i mean ;) i’m not an native english speaker, so please if i make any mistakes don’t go copy-pasting them to show how right your own opinion is. okay? thanks.
    i think the list is great! good work. i laughed my ass of at some points and on others i thought “thats exactly what i thought!!!” and there are points – as it was told by other commentators – that seem very childish and some are just “gap fillers”. but if you have to fill 95 points, i guess you have to put some of them in. but why do you have to fill 95 at the forst place?
    well i think the twilight series is quite nice if you read it without… well without thinking about it. just read it for fun. when you start critizicing… you wont get to an end :D if you look at it from a literary perspective you want to puke at it, but if you read it as we germans call it a “groschenroman” (dime novel) than its quite okay. and i’ve watched the film and actually could hardly stop myself from laughing when he said “you are my life now” that was TOO MUCH! i mean, its just without substence und deephts and meaning. so dont go compare it with ANY good literature, or any book at all… i mean, everybody knows that it will never get to the standard of shakespeare or any of the other big authors and dont go whining about that, its just true. just because you dont understand him, dont talk about his work. that was great literatur. twilight cant even compare with harry potter (which i like very much), anne rice, dracula or any other good book.
    im studying literature and i think i am able to see beyond my taste for something (i didnt like every “big” novel i had to read… believe me, i didnt…) and judge it by neutral points. such as: character development, deeper meaning, symbolism and so on and so on (not good in saying this in english at all, i know). and judged by these and other factors: its crap. sorry, i dont want to hurt anybodys feelings, but thats my opinion. to read for fun: quite good. as literatur: please dont mention this book!

    bey bey!

    mouse

  1084. Rachel
    Posted October 20, 2009 at 2:01 am

    I just found this, and was scrolling through, and some Twilight fan was comparing those horrendous books to Jane Austen.

    That made my whole damn day, because it’s seriously the funniest thing I’ve read in a while.

    Comparing Austen to Meyer is like comparing Heaven and Hell. Grammatical errors, in Austen’s novels? They were written long before we were born, so the dialect is clearly different. Of course it’s going to be hard to read! Just because Twilight has simple grammar doesn’t mean it’s “amazing”. (On another note, has anyone seen the dictionary they have specifically for Twilight, so readers can understand the multitude of adjectives Fail Meyer uses? It’s absurd)

    It’s obvious that the person who posted that has never read a Jane Austen novel, and should go read one as soon as possible to learn what real literature truly is.

    By the way, I love this list. :) <3

  1085. RobRum
    Posted October 20, 2009 at 2:44 am

    Blood-Lust, thanks for the responce. i only get to look at this site every 3 to 4 days so i cant keep up if someone does respond. anyway, i dont capitalize like i should cuz i can still get my point across withough it. i was also under the impression that you were not to grammar conscience by reading you previous posts, glad someone pointed that out.
    you commented on the repetitiveness of this list…..have you read the books?…..all she does is repeat things over and over and over again.
    ““as a fan of this series you should like to have things repeated over and over and over again.” This is just your opinion but again, hate to break it to you, but the ‘a’ is meant to be a capital letter. That was another point made by someone, that Twilight fans can’t use capital letters, well neither can you RobRum, you only used 16 (maybe 17) capital letters and 9 of them were misused. I on the other hand, can use capital letters, as I have proved so again that is a steriotype. I hate it when people are hipocritical like that, they say that Twilight fans can’t use capital letters and other things like that, but then go do that themselves… I just hate it.” thats from you post, i have never said that twifans cant use capitalization, you are thinking of someone else.

    “And yet again, you saying “when you grow up someday you will see these books for what they are and realize what you were for being so nutz over them. or you will never grow up and act like you didnt get a pony for your 12th birthday.” I’m not going to even bother pointing out the mistakes in this quote. This is an assumption. How do you know what I will do when I grow up? The answer… you don’t, so you saying that is just so annoying.

    So I will either grow up or act like I didn’t get a Pony for my 12th birthday… what a choice. Personally I want to act like I didn’t get a Pony for my 12th birthday. I would rather do that than stop reading the books any day.” looks like you did infact point out my mistakes. thanks for being consistant.

    “If I was you RobRum, I would find out all the facts before you go around making assumpitons” the facts are that you were acting like the fans you say you are not like. someone has a different opinion than you ….bash bash bash….why no pony again…:(…..your a big dummy dum dum….etc….prove RobRum right…

    i will say this, you did recognize when someone pointed out your mistakes and i give you fill marks for that.

    in the back of the first boot there was a reference to comparing twilight to other classic works. i cant remember the books that were referenced. i would like to get your opinion on those books.

    anyway, its been a fun conversation to say the least.

    L8r Lust

  1086. Blood-Lust
    Posted October 20, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    Hey RobRum, thanks for the responce :0) I never said that you were the one that said Twilight fans can’t use capital letters, I just stated that on another post someone has.

    I do not act like some of the fans that have been described on this site. I am alot more civilised than some of the twilight fans, I do not go round screaming and shouting at people who do not like Twilight, and I do not get phisicaly violent with people who do not like Twilight either. As I have stated before, if you had actually met some of those fans, you would realise how wrong you are mate!

    “the facts are that you were acting like the fans you say you are not like. someone has a different opinion than you ….bash bash bash….why no pony again…:(…..your a big dummy dum dum….etc….prove RobRum right…” how am I acting like one of those fans? How am I saying you’re a big dumb dumb? How am I proving you right RobRub? Because please, let me know!

    Blood-Lust

  1087. Punz
    Posted October 20, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    I really enjoyed the list, it was very entertaing. I am a huge Twilight fan, but I do see the faults in the story. I Do Not think that the series is the greatest thing ever, but for me it was very enjoyable to read. I personally believe that everyone is attacking the series manly because of all the hype. I mean, ever since the movie came out, there has been nothing but attack after attack on the saga. I enjoy reading, its a nice escape from reality and its constructive. If people enjoy Twilight then let them, if people hate Twilight let them, its all about what YOU like as an individual. That being said, the media is hyping the saga up to much to the point that ever other moive us about vampires. I’ve loved vampires since the first time I seen The Lost Boys and it’s sad to see them become so PG-13.

  1088. Grig
    Posted October 20, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    >>> “You may think Edward Cullen is smart and fast, but Chuck Norris could take him.”

    LOL! Twilight SUCKS.

  1089. RobRum
    Posted October 21, 2009 at 2:31 am

    Blood-Lust….
    “as a fan of this series you should like to have things repeated over and over and over again.” This is just your opinion but again, hate to break it to you, but the ‘a’ is meant to be a capital letter. That was another point made by someone, that Twilight fans can’t use capital letters, well neither can you RobRum, you only used 16 (maybe 17) capital letters and 9 of them were misused. I on the other hand, can use capital letters, as I have proved so again that is a steriotype. I hate it when people are hipocritical like that, they say that Twilight fans can’t use capital letters and other things like that, but then go do that themselves… I just hate it.” hate to burst your bubble but when you say you hate when people are hypocritical like that, you imply that i am being hypocritical. and it is always a sign of a weak argument when you attack someones spelling/grammar/punctuation/etc. if it meant anything i would have pointed out:
    “Twiight fans can use proper capitilization, many have proved that. I believe I havn’t missed one capital letter out on this post, so meh. O_o.”……you should at leaset spell twilight correctly if your going to defend it.

    anyway, take care and good luck with all that anger…..funny how you can not care what others think and say but get all worked up about what other think and say. just throw another shrimp on the barbie and call it a day mate…:)

    ps. i know your probably not from australia so dont get all worked upver that last comment please

  1090. Posted October 21, 2009 at 7:32 am

    So… if a 100 year old vampire sleeps with a 17 year old school girl – does that make him a paedophile?? Or does it make her a necrophiliac??

  1091. Mollieeee
    Posted October 21, 2009 at 10:47 am

    I seem to be one of the few here that actually likes the Twilight Series..

    So to begin I’ll say that yes, the writing was not particuarly good, but it did progress without the whole series. Secondly, if you know anything about Stephanie Meyer, you will know she wrote Twilight for her own pleasure – she was not an experienced writer, nor did she know one day her book might be published.

    Also, as it has been said, the author of this list is entitled to their own opinion, and so am I.

    I think these reasons are quite immature and childish, the list mentions several things repeatedly, and as for Edward being a phaedophile?!? You are reading far to much into the lines…

    I also fail to see how the vampires’ sparkling is a cause for hate!! Quote: There’s something disturbing about Carlisle turning only teenagers into vampires. My answer?? I think, dear writer, you have failed to notice that Esme is twenty-seven years old. Oh dear.

    Quote: Isn’t funny how Twilight fans can’t spell and use proper capitalization? By the way, 61, 62, and 63 are real quotes.
    Err, for one thing, that is rather offensive to many Twilight fans (Like me, for example) who CAN use proper grammar, and also a little hypocritical.

    Miss Meyer has no doubtedly made grammatical errors in the writing of her book, all authors will. So I find more that it is the fault of the proof reader and editor, don’t you???

    Maybe most surprisingly, I am a 12 year old who is quite able to use proper grammar, punctuation and spelling – so really, there is no excuse for any of this. For all you know, this list could have been written by a kid like me….

  1092. Harharhar
    Posted October 21, 2009 at 10:52 am

    RobRum, I think you’ll find in the last 2 paragraphs of your comment, you missed out a lot of capital letters..

    So meh!

  1093. Blood-Lust
    Posted October 21, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    Thank god for that :0) some one agrees with me!

    RobRum, you are an immature pain in the arse who needs to get a life! (we are intitled to our own opinion, aren’t we?) You should stop victimising teenage girls and start making valid points against Twilight fans, not just picking apart my posts! Oh and just because I’m not from Australia, that automatically makes me take offence to that comment???

    O_o Blood-Lust

  1094. Emily
    Posted October 21, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    This List is so Funny and the comments are just as Hilarious.
    I do agree with The Twilight Books being badly written and that the love story within it, is copied from majority of British writers, such as William Shakepeares, Emily Bronte and Jane Austen.
    Have to mention how ridiculous the Vampire’s are portrayed in the Books, they have no Fangs and they glow in the Sunlight, Had to laugh at that, when I found out.
    And to compare Twilight to Shakespeare’s, Emily Bronte’s and Jane Austen’s Books is really insulting, and whoever thinks that Twilight is as good as Harry Potter are in Denial or in their own deluded world, thinking that Twilight is Better than Harry Potter. Honestly The Hype of Twilight isnt as Big here in the UK, as we prefer Harry Potter cause no offence to everyone else, we take our literature seriously.
    Hello!… the Best Writers are from the UK, you got to admit that.

  1095. Amanda
    Posted October 21, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    Couldn’t agree more, especially with # 88. “You are allowed to have your own opinion, just like we are allowed to have ours. Get over it. Twilight fans don’t seem to understand that though and attack at the mention of flaw in the book.” So true, they are kind of like the democrats in that way, they only want to here what their side has to say and not listen to anyone else. You know that when this happens it must be a sad sad day. :)

  1096. Melbo
    Posted October 21, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    This made my day. Thank you so much! I am a Twilight fan who has read all the books and really liked them but I agree with so many of your points.

  1097. JoJo
    Posted October 21, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    Thank you for this article. Now I don’t have to waste my time reading this in book order to form solid arguments against Twilight fans of why I would rather read Dickens than a Meyers book. I watched the movie and I almost died laughing. Then I watched Bill and Ted’s Bogus Adventure and felt that I had used my time more wisely.

  1098. Posted October 21, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    This reaaaally made my day!!
    How can I contact you? I would like to give… IDK… maybe 35 more reasons why A GIRL HATES TWILIGHT ;) !

  1099. RobRum
    Posted October 21, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    Harharhar and Blood-Lust…can you really believe that if i dont capitalize correctly that it makes my points or arguments less effective ?? what if i could not spell correctly? “RobRum, you are an immature pain in the arse who needs to get a life! (we are intitled to our own opinion, aren’t we?) You should stop victimising” the words you are looking for are “entitled” and “victimizing” Blood. intitled is not even a word…..and you cant even spell twilight correctly.
    like i said picking on spelling/punctuation /grammer is a sign that your argument is weak and you have nothing left.
    and the Australia comment was a joke as was the ps. i figured you would get at least one of them, guess the joke is on me since you cant figure anything out.

  1100. Lala
    Posted October 22, 2009 at 7:36 am

    well i didn\’t bother reading the rest i\’m too lazy

    so yeah i stopped at number 11.
    i disagree. edward is not perfect. bella and/or stephenie herself, is making edward look perfect.
    when in fact, he is not.

    he\’s a tortured soul. he has to control himself every single day with bella and come on… your life isn\’t perfect if you have to deal with that every day.

    so i disagree. he\’s not perfect. although he looks like a god, that doesn\’t mean he\’s perfect. perfection can come through a person\’s characteristics.. and looking at edward, he\’s a very, very flawed character.

    duh.

  1101. Joe-Joe
    Posted October 22, 2009 at 9:52 pm

    Why are we taking this list so seriously? It’s just something to laugh at. And if you love Twilight, why bother coming here at all? If you hate Twilight… Well, it’s obvious why you’re here.

    But seriously. Don’t waste your time getting into petty arguments over something as menial as Twilight. If you like it, fine. If you hate it, fine.

    Although… I’m going to be a little hypocritical here and throw in my opinion. Twilight – yes, I read all four books – was terrible. Okay, the end.

  1102. maxx unlimited
    Posted October 22, 2009 at 11:18 pm

    Wow, I think this just made my day!

  1103. Posted October 24, 2009 at 3:04 am

    Thank God twatlite is dead in my town. ^^ all the posters and movies are in the discount bin!! LOL!!

  1104. Tasha
    Posted October 28, 2009 at 9:53 am

    + Edward is a 108yr old Virgin
    ++ In Breaking Dawn, you could class Bella as a necrophile :/
    x

  1105. judy
    Posted October 28, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    dude i love it!!
    <3 39 light!! ily!!!
    omg ye abut i hate twilight and everything about it….seriously? those r real quotes?!!?!?!

  1106. natalie
    Posted October 29, 2009 at 8:34 am

    ATTENTION TWI-HATERS!

    just like some of you, i loath twilight so i regularly go on twilightrp.ning.com to let off some steam at the ignorant faux-vamps. to really get them going, talk about raping edward

  1107. Dara
    Posted October 30, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    The only point I disagree with is you calling Twilight literature. Clearly garbage spewed onto a page.

  1108. Elizabeth
    Posted October 30, 2009 at 8:25 pm

    If I ever read the word chargrin again. I’ll be forced to go on a murderous rampage. Seriously, how many times does that word come up? Too many, that’s how many.

  1109. Meg
    Posted October 30, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    Most of those reasons are silly. Can you two write a better book?

    I do enjoy twilight but can’t stand the panting girl/women fans. The other day, i was minding my own business walking home from the beach with Twilight tucked under my arm across my chest. 4 girls around walking past me (probably around age 25) started hysterically laughing at me,, pretending to clutch a book against their chests, and imitating vomiting actions. wtf? Now, theres mature behaviour from Anti Twi hards…

    Don’t people have the right to read any book they choose?

    Plus, i am just as ANTI the screaming stalker teenagers and pathetic women fans as most people.. but really, some of these i hate twilight people are just as bad as the stalkers fans. I was just walking along quietly with the book…..not screaming and jumping up and down saying i want to screw a dead guy.

  1110. Judi
    Posted October 31, 2009 at 4:39 am

    It’s a teenage romantic fantasy fiction novel. Read it for what it is. Sure flaws are plenty, but if you can see pass that, it’s a pretty good read. You got to think fantasy, not real life. Whatever Meyer write WILL NEVER happen in real life. Edward doesn’t exist!!!! Vampires don’t exist. Werewolves don’t exisit. If you don’t like it, read something else. Don’t blast the books.

  1111. Liz
    Posted November 1, 2009 at 10:46 am

    Judi:

    Excuse me, but are you stupid? Teenage books are not supposed to be bad! It is not right to teach children the stuff that twilight teaches them. The tricky part is: The little idiots who fall in love with Edward don’t understand Edward is not real.

    We have to protect the young girls of our world (the boys too, of course)!

  1112. Tatti
    Posted November 1, 2009 at 11:01 am

    all the twilight “luvers” here, get out

    this our space ya know! The smart people?

    Get it?

    NO?

    Right, there is only for me to give you proper explanation! Press the red button in the top right courner. Why? Just do it?
    Still wondering why? OK. Edward is behind the internet window. He beggs you to come and see him! NOW you got it!

    Liz:
    Who the hell cares???????????? But liked ya beatin’ up judi with ya words, I couldn’t do that. Well, young girls of world, if they are so stupid they love edward, are the worth protection? I don’t think so.

  1113. Posted November 1, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    First of all, I must agree with most of what you said. Many of these are, in fact, thoughts I have had myself. And certainly, Stephen King is one of the most famous writers dealing with the genres of occult and horror (which does, in fact, include vampires), and he has been around for quite a while and seen a lot of literature, so his opinion should be valued. Also, Stephanie Meyer is just not a good writer. Her writing may appeal to a certain group of people, but that doesn’t automatically make her a good writer. She has an excellent sense of plot in the first book, but all the characters other then Bella and Edward are quite underdeveloped. The books then get progressively worse, as the aforementioned sense of plot deteriorates. She has turned the once- fearsome, legendary character of the vampire into something sparkly and, frankly, quite pathetic. Also, she takes the blood- sucking abilities of vampires and mashes them together with characteristics of succubi and other mythological characters, then has the nerve to call them ‘vampires’, which they are clearly not. The vampires of the middle ages were fearsome beasts, their bodies only vaguely human. Those were real vampires. THen they made Dracula, a more seductive adaptation, but he had numerous flaws, and for all his beauty, he was inherently evil. Twilight vampires are not VAMPIRES. They are freaks of myth.

  1114. Eric D
    Posted November 2, 2009 at 12:21 am

    Sarah, you are cool =)

  1115. Franky H
    Posted November 2, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    Amen To That!
    Twilight Is Just Ridiculous!

  1116. Renée
    Posted November 3, 2009 at 9:32 am

    I have read the Twilight books, it´s a fantasy. I have seen the `The Lord of the Rings´ trilogy – every year (at that time): which is an epic fantasy novel. I’m addicted to the True Blood serie, which is also a fantasy based on the Sookie Stackhouse books. I have been to the first Twilight movie and i´m definitely going to the second/third and fourth one.

    Every writer uses (in one way or another) there own daily experiences, thoughts, memories, fantasies for writing there book(s). There are so many books with the same story, but with directions to the likes of different people.
    They used a popular theme for many people around the world, which worked.

    Ok, you hate. But you bought it and read it. Probably many times, otherwise you did not come up with this many reasons.
    And the story definitely made an impression on you, not a good one, but that big, that you sat for an hour or 2 behind your computer to write a blog about it on the internet.

    I bet secretly you love it big time.

  1117. Posted November 3, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    Okay, two things:
    1. People can like Twilight as long as they’re not foaming at the mouth when you criticize it. Its just a book. Get over it and stop being annoying.
    2. Women are stupid and should stay in the kitchen.

  1118. random fact giver
    Posted November 3, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    By the way, Stephenie Meyer didn’t write this series to sell; she wrote it because she enjoys writing. Not that this even matters, but i just thought i’d say it.

    I think it is stupid to compare twilight and Harry Potter, because they are about totally different things. In my opinion, Harry Potter is not better, because Harry is so obsessed about himself. Harry Potter and twilight rate about the same in my opinion.

    one more thing, #11 and #19 are contradictory to each other.

  1119. Posted November 4, 2009 at 1:17 am

    Words cannot express how much I agree with you, this book shows the vastly growing problem of illiteracy and distortion from reality.

    It gives personableness to lonely teenage girls, which people commend instead of supporting things like Dove’s campaign for inner beauty.

    Women, learn to think with your brains, not your vaginae!

    Thank you again for posting this, I really wish there wasn’t just a “like” button, but a “LOVE” button!

    I would sincerely enjoy your thoughts on other novels, as you clearly have a rapure wit!

    Thanks again!

  1120. CB
    Posted November 5, 2009 at 3:51 am

    Number 61 is incorrect, not all Twilight fans are insane. Some people actually enjoy Twilight without taking it too seriously especially to the point that the lines between fantasy and reality get blurred for them or turning into a sociopath like the people who made the posts that you used as examples. I’m a fan but I would never treat non fans like that or threaten to harm them. if I did I would shut of the TV, throw away my Twilight series books and DVD and head to the nearest mental hospital to get help.

  1121. Sarah-Lou
    Posted November 6, 2009 at 1:24 am

    if you hate it so much then why did you read the books.. wouldn’t you just stop reading when it didn’t appeal to you… ?obviously you hated twilight, so why read the other 3 in the series… (though i question how much of it sunk in from some of your reasons, you have clearly skimmed over the books)

    ….Why squander your time to think of 95 reasons why you hate it just to wind people up (very mature) and waste even more time reading peoples comments and responding to some of them. Isn’t that just wasted energy? why don’t you write about a book you do like instead of paying an author out for her success? It’s really pathetic.

    Books and Literature are very personal – what appeals to someone will not appeal to the next person. If you know so much about literature which you claim to, then you would know this.

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion – im just not sure why you would go to such great lengths to voice yours if you hated it so much. why not just forget about it?

  1122. Rebecca
    Posted November 6, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    Calm down, seriously. If you read this list and took it so seriously, you obviously can’t see that it is meant to be humorous.

    And as for finishing all four books: a person has to finish every single book before they can have an opinion. I read all four books, Breaking Dawn took me three months to read because it was so terrible, but I read it. I finished it, and now I can say that I hate the Twilight series.

    It’s not right to say that you hate a series if you’ve never read it. Those people are just ignorant.

    Those people that take this book way too seriously are the ones that need to realize that it’s fiction. They’re the annoying ones, the crazy ones that think Edward is real, and that vampires really sparkle – I am aware vampires are fictional.

    And, yes, everyone is entitled to their opinion. If a person feels strongly about something, they will go to great lengths to voice their opinion.

    Honestly… Twilight equals epic fail.

  1123. Ih8theFilm
    Posted November 6, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    This is So Funny, I think what upset me the most is the Casting of the Film, from all the guys in thw World, they got Robert Pattinson to play Edward, and from the all the girls in the World they got Kriten Stewart, those are the two casting that really annoys me, they can’t act and they are so not what everyone saw as Edward and Bella before the Film came out. Hayden Christensen would have been perfest for Edward, but cause of his age, they should have got some who resembles Hayden Christensen, and with Bella, Stephanie Meyer’s Choice of Emily Browning would have been so much better, plus she looks young enough to play a 17 year old, after all she is only still 20 years old, and she is a better actress than Kristen Stewart. I just really hate how the first film came out, the 2 main choice of Actor’s acting is what really put me off, plus the Directing was really bad too.

  1124. Kevin
    Posted November 6, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    This list was kinda funny. Mostly because of how stupid most of the reasons were. I do agree with some of them though. It was kinda poorly written. And she didn’t really develope any other characters. But you were wrong with other reasons. Like all the names arent creative. I don’t think Carlisle, Esme, or Rosalie are very popular names at all. Also please don’t imply that every Twilight fan is obssessed with it. I like the series but i didn’t go crazy over it. And i know alot of people who like the series that aren’t teenage girls.

    P.S. Im a guy and i like Twilight.

  1125. Sezza
    Posted November 6, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    rebecca if you hate the first book Twilight, you are going to hate the rest in the series too, spend your time reading books you enjoy instead. Your opinion of Twilight should have been enough for you to realise you wouldnt enjoy the rest of them, seems kinda silly to me.

  1126. Rebecca
    Posted November 6, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    Sezza:

    Not true. When I read the first book, I was a senior in high school, and I enjoyed it. So I went to the second… It got progressively worse. And I felt I needed to read every one of the books to have a viable opinion. Else people could just say, “Well, you didn’t read all of the books, so how do you know that you hate them?” And now I can say that I definitely know.

    The Sookie Stackhouse novels by Charlaine Harris are much, much better. So I am reading books that I enjoy, thank you.

  1127. sezza
    Posted November 7, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    Rebecca

    sorry if i offended you, everyone is different i guess, if i had hated twilight i wouldnt have read the other 3 .. but that is just me.. i’d read books i enjoy rather than reading 4 books i didn’t just so i could have a viable opinion. If anyone asked, I’d simply say i had read the first one and wasn’t interested in the others. (but would you get smacked over the head by a twi hard for saying this?) It’s just a book series people take it way too seriously.

    peace..

  1128. Posted November 8, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    I had to stop after number 18!! I knew it had to do with Harry Potter!! Ungh bella does have a personality u just cant see it because the books are from her point of view, if S.M ever finished Midnight Sun you will see that its the same way around with Edward, n that he has a lot of flaws :/

  1129. Ashley Gordon
    Posted November 8, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    OK for one thing half of your so called reasons for hating this book are retarded! like Chuck Norris could take Edward. really that’s the best you got. I am not a crazy twilight fan but really. making up that many reasons that you hate a book means the exact opposite, you obsessed with it. more than i am and im a fan.

  1130. Posted November 8, 2009 at 6:47 pm

    Twilight IS good. Just becauseyou guys hate it dusn’t mean that you have to make up inacurite reasons to prove its dumb. Bellas clumsy? Er….yea so? Bella almost kills herself when Edward leaves because SHe LOVES him SO much…he IS her life. He loves her to and tries to protect her ect…

    moral:Twilight IS good…

  1131. Posted November 8, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    twilight suxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx so muchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh the rofl knife declaires blood on twilight

  1132. Rebecca
    Posted November 8, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    Sezza:

    It’s fine. I didn’t mean to be so snappy about it, and I apologize. I do believe that Twilight lovers would beat me up if I said I hated it and had only read the first book. And I’m just strange in general.

    And it is just a book; people do take it way too seriously. It’s those people that make me cringe. They really do…

    Molly:

    Twilight isn’t good. And perhaps your argument would be better if you could spell and not have annoying capitalized words all over the place.

    A lot of these reasons may very well be random, but a lot of them are true. Bella is a “Mary Sue.” And you even proved the fact that she can’t do anything without Edward when you said that he was her life.

    I mean, how pathetic is that to have some dead guy be your life? And then let him impregnate you – when that should be impossible by Stephenie Meyer’s reasons – with devil spawn, only to kill you and take you away from your family?

    Bella is a terrible character. And any good character Meyer may have had, she didn’t develop at all; i.e., Alice and Jasper.

    I know people have different opinions, but when the article states “Why I Hate Twilight,” why do people who love Twilight bother to come and read it when they know they’re just going to get so aggravated?

    *Sigh*

  1133. Trade Runner
    Posted November 9, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    Ok, one only has to read Bram Stokers Dracula or Rice’s Interview with a Vampire to know Twilight is a fanfiction of these two greater novels. Maybe teens today are more simple-minded than they once were as far as literary competance goes… If eddie has to scream about how dangerous he is… he’s not… though I can see how a pansy like him would be unable to get a girl with an ounce of pride or intellect, come on how many times does she have to read the same damn book before she understands it?!? I agree with this list whole-heartedly, I watched the movie in hopes they would retool the work to a more interesting venue, alas no such luck, it was made worse by actors who clearly lack skill and too many Matrix-esque round-pan shots. In todays hormone driven teen society, break-up pain might last til she’s trashed him to her friends that evening, not gut-wrenching pain for months. And what sort of moronic kid turns down a piece of virgin ass… come one if girls really believed men cherish such things as girls with a sense of morality… why are so many teenage girls pregnant? The whole series is nothing but watered down soap opera, a badly written one at that.

  1134. Alisha
    Posted November 10, 2009 at 6:55 am

    Is not each individual person allowed to have their own opinion and views as to what they take out of a book?? You didn’t like it, but clearly others have loved it. Maybe for what you critisize as being able to put themselves in a fiction novel’s character is something that others enjoy.
    Anyway, what I am saying is that is doesn’t HAVE to be your way, some will agree and others not.
    Besides, this world is too negative and unsupporting to emphasise by putting more hate into a single book…there are plenty out there…

  1135. Amelia
    Posted November 10, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    It is actually rather funny how a person can dislike something so much, but yet you spend your precious time writing 100 reason why people shouldn\’t brother with these books/movies. It is actually rather brilliant how you just repeatedly contradict yourself.
    Love the books it really is a good love story.

  1136. Shelly :)
    Posted November 10, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    Well, i personally like the series. It is not my favorite vampire book series but i did enjoy it. Yeahhh……but those reasons did make me giggle :)

  1137. urjustajealousb*tch
    Posted November 11, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    your list is lame, redundant and pathetic. get a life!

  1138. Rebecca
    Posted November 12, 2009 at 12:47 am

    To “urjustajealousb*tch.”

    I suppose you’re the one who needs to get a life… This person obviously has one, seeing as they read the entire series, and wrote up a laundry list of things she thought was wrong with it. And redundancy is a legitimate way of getting a point across. You’ve probably done it yourself before.

    As for it being lame… Eh, you think that, but it was meant to be humorous, and not to be taken so seriously; though it did have that underlying tone of seriousness.

    Pathetic it was not. Creative, imaginative, and enjoyable, it was.

    And how in the heck can you say wether she is jealous or not? You don’t know; you probably will never know. So you’re the one who needs to get a life… The end.

  1139. Twihard
    Posted November 13, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    And I think you\\\\\\\’re just saying the same things over and over again, trying to get a 100 reasons, but failing. Quite a shame actually. Who doesn\\\\\\\’t need 100 (or 95 in this case) stupidities to make you laugh, while you\\\\\\\’re taking a pause from reading Twilight for the 10423949th time?

  1140. Sophia
    Posted November 14, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.
    Amen!
    Haha, and Harry Potter could TOTALLY kick Edward’s ass, I mean, come on, the guy who defeated the darkest wizard of all time v.s a sparkly perve? That fight would be over in a second. I loved reading this, it really made my day

  1141. Twilight.Hater.that want peace among both haters and lovers
    Posted November 15, 2009 at 1:28 am

    Hey guys. Listen. I am a huge twilight hater, but I have nothing against the people who like it. My best friend became a “vampire” and all emo like. I don’t know what you lovers are so hyped up about. if you love twilight, then don’t read it. Guys, we can get along. I respect that you love the books, but you have to know that it has to be fair both ways. Everything has its flaws. Do we go and attack you on your lovers forum? I’m sorry if we do, but I find it wrong both ways. The list made me laugh, and don’t hate me for being a hater, realize that we are all humans, and NOT vampires.
    I disagree With some haters. There are people that are perfect like edward out there, but it is true that you should be so closed minded to say that you will take no one else. Please realize that reality is cruel. Look, if you want to attack the haters, do it somewhere else. I’m trying to be nice about this, but if you still feel you have the right to do this to the haters, we’ll do it right back.
    HATERS!!!! I know, it may be the horrible truth, but lovers are just as sane and human as we are.
    LOVERS: notice that what you are doing is wrong.

    Some of the comments you posted may be hurtful. Think about our situation. how would WE feel? Like we should be informed about how you feel. this forum was not put up to make you upset, it was here so thers can express their oppinion on the matter.

    RELAX BOTH OF YOU!!!!!!!

    (and yes i hate Twilight then most people here)

  1142. tracey
    Posted November 15, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    I REALLY HATE TWILIGHT.
    THE BOOKS ARE CRAP THE MOVIES ARE CRAP THE ACTORS ARE CRAP.
    I’M SO SICK OF HEARING ABOUT TWILIGHT.
    KRISTEN STEWART CAN NOT ACT AND SHE HAS MADE ROB PATTINSON IN TO SUCH A GIRL. HE USE TO B OK BEFORE HE WENT NEAR HER.
    AND WHO EVER HEARD OF GAY VAMPIRES ANYWAY.
    AHHHHH

  1143. Hiiii
    Posted November 15, 2009 at 11:47 pm

    AMEN.
    Twilight. Frickin. Sucks.
    This list had me laughing and nodding my head all the way through.

  1144. Mary
    Posted November 16, 2009 at 1:50 am

    Twilight sucks. I am from Washington state and am a little disgusted that my favorite hiking trails in the serene Pacific Northwest are now going to be flocked by Twilight-obsessed readers who are more into looking for Edward Cullen than nature. Blah. Oh by the way..there are no pelicans in Washington.

  1145. Pills here.
    Posted November 16, 2009 at 11:51 am

    I think that this serie’s major flaw was that it was just a poorly thought out brain fart. I mean, Stephanie M. probably was just sitting on the couch eating ice cream when a random thing popped into her head about vampires. In my opinion, women tend to like to read things with over-exaggeration or speak loudly with exaggerated tones. But young women like it when they hear exaggeration. This is why it is so popular. All you have to say is, his chest was perfectly toned and all the girls will start to scream over nothing. ITS A LOAD OF CRAP

  1146. Kira_Uchiha
    Posted November 16, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    Mentions of Light Yagami? Harry Potter? Chuck Norris?
    I LOVE you Ahahahaha

    Bella is the worst female character ever developed. Hermione Granger is much better. Stephen King was right, Stephenie Meyer can’t write worth a darn.

    There is just one thing I would like to say to the Twilight lovers…
    Edward Cullen is not a real person. It’s time you realised that. And even if he was a boyfriend like that would drive you insane with his possesive ways.
    Bring on the hate

  1147. Becca
    Posted November 17, 2009 at 1:11 am

    I’m going to see New Moon on Saturday. And I’m going to be wearing this shirt:

    “I Love Twilight! Abusive Boyfriend: I want one. Pedophilia: Totally awesome. Plot: Who needs it?

    Plus! Sparkling vampires make great disco balls!

    And in a perfect world… Buffy staked Edward. The end.”

  1148. hec
    Posted November 17, 2009 at 7:00 am

    twinnies, rather children, should not read about vamps.
    but then new moon is not about real vamps at all.
    if you did…
    maybe you should take bella’s advice…
    go die
    maybe a violent, mean, but well waxed- six- pac bearing man will be there…
    your tears can polish his chest.

    ed is a sanitised vamp for a new younger audience.

    dear god why !!!!!!!!!

    die die die.

  1149. Ashley
    Posted November 17, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    I love you
    Amen to 86
    been saying that from the begining

  1150. Shortie
    Posted November 17, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    ok, i agree with some of the stuff but i think you went a little overboard…seriously, you repeated like 15 reasons over and over. Get over it…we got that you have an opinion but nobody cares. Your probably just jealous that all you have to do with your free time is write this stupid thing

  1151. Anonymous
    Posted November 17, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    1. Reading twilight” is not actually “reading” it’s more like trying to swallow down too much pudding and gagging it back up. Then dying because you choked on one of the Meyer’s incorrectly used, fishhook J’s. To say “At least kids are reading!” as a compliment to Twiligh,t is like saying, “At least kids are eating!” about McDonalds.
    2. To those who believe they can beat any Twi-Haters (trying to spread that around) who believe they can “beat me up” by using all of their “vampire powers acquired from reading the book.” I dare you, seriously. I weigh like 85lbs and took down someone who was more ripped than Dwayne Johnson, seriously!
    3. This book was apparently based on a wet dream Meyers had. Nuff Said!
    4. I read (or tried to read) the first book. I ended up chucking it at a wall, a nerd, my English teacher (who let me & didn’t give me detention for it), and a TwiCrazy (trying to spread that around too) and then my brain practically melted. I blame the stupid book.
    5. Someone in an earlier comment said that “literature is about making money” and that if you believed otherwise you were a “purist”
    6. Really? So, you’ve never read a book for your own enjoyment. OOOOOOOOh!!! How about teaching our young spudkins (children; trying to spread that around too) how to read and write? Dumb Ass!
    7. The town is named Forks… wow. (Meanwhile in the suburbs of Spoons and Knives…) Try to come up with a town name that doesn’t sound like a common household item.
    8. For those who are telling Twi-Haters to “deal with” the book are dumb asses. We can do more than “Deal with it,” if enough people agree and congress listens (for once) we can have the book banned from the U.S. Deal with that! You’ll be arrested if it actually happens. (One of my “Legal Friends” has a petition pending)
    9. Someone else, not naming anyone (AKA KarolineA press Ctrl+F and enter her name to find her post) said that Twilight was the first book Meyers ever wrote. YOU ARE A DUMB ASS!!!! She has written another book, previous to TWILIGHT. Do your RESEARCH before bagging on someone else (like I do my research!!!!!!)
    10. Wouldn’t the books be better if all the dialogue was yelled and a curse word was put at the end of every line?
    11. It’s not even a love story! It’s more like a really really bad NBC soap opera/funeral montage/cartoon/radio static all put in a blender.
    12.
    TWILIGHT SUMMARY IN DIALOGUE BETWEEN EDWARD AND BELLA:
    E: hey
    B: what’s up?
    E: I love you but I can’t be with you
    B: I love you more because I’m willing to die at you and/or your family member’s hands.
    E: …Cool
    B: yea…
    E: werewolves suck
    B: I know, right!
    ETC! ETC! ETC!
    13. By reading a “Why I hate Twilight” blog and bagging on it in the comments section shows that you are actually a TwiCrazy! The title of this blog is pretty self explanatory so if you like Twilight, why read it (it being the blog)?
    14. Edward is a 109 year old virgin. REALLY?! If Edward is so good looking why hasn’t he gotten laid yet.
    15. Vampire Baseball? Unoriginal! I could just play regular baseball while wearing fake fangs.
    16. For those who say Harry Potter isn’t as commercialized as Twilight, I saw a Harry Potter Brand Game Of Life! Seriously! (I still like Harry Potter but only the books, movies are overrated.)
    17. Some one in another earlier post said “effing.” Really? You can’t curse and have to resort to “effing?” If so then skip the rest of this number…FUCK FUCK SHITTY FUCK FUCKETY POO!
    18. Another called me a “Byyyatchh.” Really? Byyyatch? That’s pathetic! No wonder you don’t have a good opinion. You’re unoriginal and can’t even come up with a decent insult! You didn’t even spell it right, it goes Beyotch, you dumb ass! I laugh at your stupidity/unoriginality/wrongness/ignorance.
    19. How can you build up to a BIG WAR THINGY (ran out of adjectives) and then shoot down that concept? No one does that! That’s not “Literature!” it’s anti-climactic.
    20. If you want to get into scientific views the male race is actually a mutation of the female race (although I suppose you could call the male race a sub-species of women). The Y chromozone, which are the main component of identifying a male’s DNA is actually mutated from one of the two X chromosones which determine the female’s gender…I feel like a nerd now…
    21. To clear up the reason why “vampires can’t get pregnant,” it’s because THEY ARE DEAD!!! Their reproductive organs don’t function anymore (Proof-Meyers’ Vampires don’t sleep because they don’t use energy acquired from water and food that they don’t drink/eat). Even though, Carslie reveals that vampires have 25 chromosomes, they need more than that to have actual functioning reproductive organs. Besides, the chromosomes are not exactly human chromosomes (are they undead chromosomes?) if they are from vampires. We still have chromosomes when we’re dead. They just don’t function because they are inactive. I feel like a nerd again.
    22. You cannot compare the EdwardXBella relationship to the JaneXRochester relationship in Jane Eyre. They are completely different. Rochester can’t love Jane because he is already married to a mentally unstable woman and infidelity was punished in the English Victorian Age. Edward is a vampire and can kill Bella.
    23. Some one (bizzy )posted: “yes, meyer took a story line that has been used many times, but she made it better than ever and i really don’t care what you think because my edward is coming to get me someday even if you don’t believe me!!! TWILIGHT ROCKS!!! AND SO DOES STEPHENIE MEYER!!!” If “your Edward” is coming to get some you then why did he marry Bella? I spit on your pathetic-ness.
    24. “Supermassive Black Hole” was written before the movie came out and was put in by the sound mixer while the movie was being edited. Just because a song is in a movie doesn’t mean it was specifically made for that movie. Besides, we’re talking about the BOOKS not the MOVIES.
    25. Pelicans in Washington?! If you are going to put an aquatic bird in the story, make sure it is placed geographically correct! These little details piss me off the most.
    26. “Twilight IS good. Just becauseyou guys hate it dusn’t mean that you have to make up inacurite reasons to prove its dumb. Bellas clumsy? Er….yea so? Bella almost kills herself when Edward leaves because SHe LOVES him SO much…he IS her life. He loves her to and tries to protect her ect…” Wow Molly-i LOVE Twilight. Way to classify yourself as a victim of teenage-girl syndrome. Bella’s not even living!! Girls who can’t get over an abusive boyfriend and resort to suicide are really not so logical and shouldn’t be considered heroes or role models. They are so enraptured in the illusion of “LOVE” they don’t notice that they can’t feel their legs due to a stab in the back (literally). While being a victim of the But-I-Love-Him-So-It’s-Okay-He’s-Hitting-Me syndrome, Bella is showing that she has no self respect or independence. This does not reinforce the boundaries and walls various woman have built up against abusive and male supremacy based relationships. I don’t even want to lower myself to your level and edit your neglectful grammar issues. (dusn’t/Bellas/SHe/ect)

    P.S. Who wants to join S.W.A.T.
    Strong
    Women
    Against
    Twilight

    PS (again!!!)-it was just a coincidence that the acronym ended up like that

    I’m so annoyed right now and I feel like singing.

    To Stephanie Meyer: In the words of Wednesday Addams, “Your work is puerile and under-dramatized. You lack any sense of structure, character and the Aristotelian unities.”

    Always remember: POTATOES ARE GOOD FOR YOU!

  1152. Anonymous
    Posted November 17, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    1. Reading twilight\” is not actually \”reading\” it\’s more like trying to swallow down too much pudding and gagging it back up. Then dying because you choked on one of the Meyer\’s incorrectly used, fishhook J\’s. To say \”At least kids are reading!\” as a compliment to Twiligh,t is like saying, \”At least kids are eating!\” about McDonalds.
    2. To those who believe they can beat any Twi-Haters (trying to spread that around) who believe they can \”beat me up\” by using all of their \”vampire powers acquired from reading the book.\” I dare you, seriously. I weigh like 85lbs and took down someone who was more ripped than Dwayne Johnson, seriously!
    3. This book was apparently based on a wet dream Meyers had. Nuff Said!
    4. I read (or tried to read) the first book. I ended up chucking it at a wall, a nerd, my English teacher (who let me & didn\’t give me detention for it), and a TwiCrazy (trying to spread that around too) and then my brain practically melted. I blame the stupid book.
    5. Someone in an earlier comment said that \”literature is about making money\” and that if you believed otherwise you were a \”purist\”
    6. Really? So, you\’ve never read a book for your own enjoyment. OOOOOOOOh!!! How about teaching our young spudkins (children; trying to spread that around too) how to read and write? Dumb Ass!
    7. The town is named Forks… wow. (Meanwhile in the suburbs of Spoons and Knives…) Try to come up with a town name that doesn\’t sound like a common household item.
    8. For those who are telling Twi-Haters to \”deal with\” the book are dumb asses. We can do more than \”Deal with it,\” if enough people agree and congress listens (for once) we can have the book banned from the U.S. Deal with that! You\’ll be arrested if it actually happens. (One of my \”Legal Friends\” has a petition pending)
    9. Someone else, not naming anyone (AKA KarolineA press Ctrl F and enter her name to find her post) said that Twilight was the first book Meyers ever wrote. YOU ARE A DUMB ASS!!!! She has written another book, previous to TWILIGHT. Do your RESEARCH before bagging on someone else (like I do my research!!!!!!)
    10. Wouldn\’t the books be better if all the dialogue was yelled and a curse word was put at the end of every line?
    11. It\’s not even a love story! It\’s more like a really really bad NBC soap opera/funeral montage/cartoon/radio static all put in a blender.
    12.
    TWILIGHT SUMMARY IN DIALOGUE BETWEEN EDWARD AND BELLA:
    E: hey
    B: what\’s up?
    E: I love you but I can\’t be with you
    B: I love you more because I\’m willing to die at you and/or your family member\’s hands.
    E: …Cool
    B: yea…
    E: werewolves suck
    B: I know, right!
    ETC! ETC! ETC!
    13. By reading a \”Why I hate Twilight\” blog and bagging on it in the comments section shows that you are actually a TwiCrazy! The title of this blog is pretty self explanatory so if you like Twilight, why read it (it being the blog)?
    14. Edward is a 109 year old virgin. REALLY?! If Edward is so good looking why hasn\’t he gotten laid yet.
    15. Vampire Baseball? Unoriginal! I could just play regular baseball while wearing fake fangs.
    16. For those who say Harry Potter isn\’t as commercialized as Twilight, I saw a Harry Potter Brand Game Of Life! Seriously! (I still like Harry Potter but only the books, movies are overrated.)
    17. Some one in another earlier post said \”effing.\” Really? You can\’t curse and have to resort to \”effing?\” If so then skip the rest of this number…FUCK FUCK SHITTY FUCK FUCKETY POO!
    18. Another called me a \”Byyyatchh.\” Really? Byyyatch? That\’s pathetic! No wonder you don\’t have a good opinion. You\’re unoriginal and can\’t even come up with a decent insult! You didn\’t even spell it right, it goes Beyotch, you dumb ass! I laugh at your stupidity/unoriginality/wrongness/ignorance.
    19. How can you build up to a BIG WAR THINGY (ran out of adjectives) and then shoot down that concept? No one does that! That\’s not \”Literature!\” it\’s anti-climactic.
    20. If you want to get into scientific views the male race is actually a mutation of the female race (although I suppose you could call the male race a sub-species of women). The Y chromozone, which are the main component of identifying a male\’s DNA is actually mutated from one of the two X chromosones which determine the female\’s gender…I feel like a nerd now…
    21. To clear up the reason why \”vampires can\’t get pregnant,\” it\’s because THEY ARE DEAD!!! Their reproductive organs don\’t function anymore (Proof-Meyers\’ Vampires don\’t sleep because they don\’t use energy acquired from water and food that they don\’t drink/eat). Even though, Carslie reveals that vampires have 25 chromosomes, they need more than that to have actual functioning reproductive organs. Besides, the chromosomes are not exactly human chromosomes (are they undead chromosomes?) if they are from vampires. We still have chromosomes when we\’re dead. They just don\’t function because they are inactive. I feel like a nerd again.
    22. You cannot compare the EdwardXBella relationship to the JaneXRochester relationship in Jane Eyre. They are completely different. Rochester can\’t love Jane because he is already married to a mentally unstable woman and infidelity was punished in the English Victorian Age. Edward is a vampire and can kill Bella.
    23. Some one (bizzy )posted: \”yes, meyer took a story line that has been used many times, but she made it better than ever and i really don’t care what you think because my edward is coming to get me someday even if you don’t believe me!!! TWILIGHT ROCKS!!! AND SO DOES STEPHENIE MEYER!!!\” If \”your Edward\” is coming to get some you then why did he marry Bella? I spit on your pathetic-ness.
    24. \”Supermassive Black Hole\” was written before the movie came out and was put in by the sound mixer while the movie was being edited. Just because a song is in a movie doesn\’t mean it was specifically made for that movie. Besides, we\’re talking about the BOOKS not the MOVIES.
    25. Pelicans in Washington?! If you are going to put an aquatic bird in the story, make sure it is placed geographically correct! These little details piss me off the most.
    26. \”Twilight IS good. Just becauseyou guys hate it dusn’t mean that you have to make up inacurite reasons to prove its dumb. Bellas clumsy? Er….yea so? Bella almost kills herself when Edward leaves because SHe LOVES him SO much…he IS her life. He loves her to and tries to protect her ect…\” Wow Molly-i LOVE Twilight. Way to classify yourself as a victim of teenage-girl syndrome. Bella\’s not even living!! Girls who can\’t get over an abusive boyfriend and resort to suicide are really not so logical and shouldn\’t be considered heroes or role models. They are so enraptured in the illusion of \”LOVE\” they don\’t notice that they can\’t feel their legs due to a stab in the back (literally). While being a victim of the But-I-Love-Him-So-It\’s-Okay-He\’s-Hitting-Me syndrome, Bella is showing that she has no self respect or independence. This does not reinforce the boundaries and walls various woman have built up against abusive and male supremacy based relationships. I don\’t even want to lower myself to your level and edit your neglectful grammar issues. (dusn\’t/Bellas/SHe/ect)

    P.S. Who wants to join S.W.A.T.
    Strong
    Women
    Against
    Twilight

    PS (again!!!)-it was just a coincidence that the acronym ended up like that

    I\’m so annoyed right now and I feel like singing.

    To Stephanie Meyer: In the words of Wednesday Addams, \”Your work is puerile and under-dramatized. You lack any sense of structure, character and the Aristotelian unities.\”

    Always remember: POTATOES ARE GOOD FOR YOU!

  1153. Kristen
    Posted November 17, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    Totally agree with the entire “Twilight freaking sucks [worst book series I ever read] but the reasons are reapeating each other a lot. I would try and maybe touch it up so there different, and maybe worded a bit better. :]”

  1154. Kira_Uchiha
    Posted November 17, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    ‘P.S. Who wants to join S.W.A.T.
    Strong
    Women
    Against
    Twilight’

    To Anonymous:
    Join me up yeah? ^_^
    women need to learn to be strong and make do independently, not to be weak and dependent on love to continue living.

    Twilight glorifies domestic abuse. As a girl who has watched her Mother being controlled and manipulated and breaking free from that. Twilight is like a personal insult on her struggles.
    Teaching little girls they cannot live without a man is WRONG!!
    Letting a man control where you go, who you see and being overprotective to the point of being a stalker is also wrong.

    This book encourages women to believe that this behaviour is caring and should be accepted. It is NOT a sign they care. It is a sign they are controlling you which is a form of abuse. For women in these situation they need to know that it is possible to break free and survive without a partner.
    Twilight is the most horrible book. It honestly annoys the hell out of me that todays generation look up to the characters and wish for a boyfriend that behaves like ‘Edward Cullen’

  1155. Veronica
    Posted November 18, 2009 at 11:56 am

    I had a fun time reading the book because I kept laughing at Bella. And probably thanking God because I’m not her.

  1156. Mom B
    Posted November 19, 2009 at 11:36 am

    As a mother and an English teacher, I completely agree with you and appreciate your good sense.

    And as for Vampire Baseball…well baseball is America’s past time, right? And since Meyer is, ultimately, spreading her good Mormon propaganda, of course her vampire’s play baseball and remain virgins until marriage.

  1157. TV
    Posted November 19, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Everyone will look back on Twilight and think… “What were they thinking?” Like bellbottoms.

  1158. alicia
    Posted November 19, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    Wow the way you talk about these books it almost seems like a classic case of “The lady doth protest too much’ Are you afraid that all of your serious literary friends won’t talk to you if you admitted to reading a silly, corny book for the shear love of reading. I mean obviously the are not well written stellar pieces of literary art but they are exactly what teenagers love. Where did you get the idea that teenagers don’t fall in love that fast…my god I think I feel in love every five minutes in high school, hormones are raging out of control. And if you can’t seriously admit that you wouldn’t have loved for some gorgeous guy like that paying attention to you in high school then I think we have found out why you hate these books so much. Stop feeling the need to complain so much and realize the joy of reading just to read. Its a young adult novel for heavens sake, it never asked to be taken that seriously.

  1159. alicia
    Posted November 19, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    Also Anne Rice’s vampires don’t have sex….just thought I would throw that out there. If you want to talk about vampire books you should maybe read them first…they are all corny and they are a fiction……which means they can have any “rules” the writer wants them to have.

  1160. EdwardHater35798
    Posted November 19, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    Loved your points, totally agree!
    Robert Pattinson is NOT hot though.
    Twilight is not a good book. It sucks. I got halfway through it, and just stopped reading it. And i love reading. That’s how much it sucks though. The thing I hated most about this book was that thecharacters (WHO AREN’T PERFECT) fell in love without having said like two words to each other. People fall in love with someone who is funny, smart, and nice. Edward isn’t funny, isn’t nice, and he’s only smart because he’s like ahundred years old.
    Not to mention Bella isn’t perfect. She’s competely helpless. She also has no personality, no jokes, no brains, and no bravery. I hate Bella because she often compares herself to Juliet, but when the man she loves leaves,she doesn’t have the guts to kill herself. She should be ashamed to even compare herself to the brave Juliet.
    Not to mention, Edward as Romeo? He left the woman he loved instead of the obvious alternative of turning her into a Vampire. Romeo would have done anything to stay with Juliet. Edward is the scum of the earth, he wants to have his baby killed instead of Bella. Any real man would have put their kid first, above all else, even their wife.
    (I didn’t read this, my sister told me about it.)
    One more thing before I go, Anne Rice? Rock on! Lestat is three times the Vampire Edward is!

    PS theirs nothing wrong with staying a virgin until marriage, I read some of the coments.

  1161. Jshrimp94
    Posted November 19, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    I find it very humorous how the author of this did not use correct grammar and punctuation. The author is saying how the fans of Twilight are crazy for saying they have “vampire powers” but the author is also pointing out how Harry Potter will beat Twilight up with his “magic power”. Although Twilight is not the best book, I do not think that the book should be degraded as low as this. Another thing to point out is that the author is making fun of the incorrect spelling of some words but it is not like you would say “laugh out loud” or “I am laughing out loud” through the internet. A few of these made me laugh but most just made the author sound like a hypocrite and an anti-Twilight fan girl. Sorry!

  1162. Hellblaze
    Posted November 19, 2009 at 11:32 pm

    Amen sister! I tried to read the book, I mean really I can’t resist anything vampire related, but I died a little bit inside each time I turned the page. It was just so BORING and CLICHE and… well just plain awful! I’m big on writing style and plot and action and stuff like that so this book was a major let down for me. I seriously want to know where the hell Smeyer came up with the idea for sparkling vampires. The only reason she called them vampires is because she didn’t know how to spell fairies. Alice is enough proof of that I’m sure with her ‘pixie like features’. How does one look like a pixie? I would like to know this. She certainly has SPARKLING down!

    I hate Twilight with a passion. Mostly because I love vampires with a passion. Bram Stoker is rolling in his grave. T_T This thing brings shame to true vampires like Alucard, Angel, Spike, Nosferatu, Lestat, and we can’t forget good ol Dracula, the first of his kind! I’ll stop here. If I keep going I’ll rant forever, but thankfully you’ve already done that for me. Thanks for that by the way, took the words right outta my mouth.

    WHEW. Felt good to have freedom to rant for once. I am SURROUNDED by Twitards on a daily basis, including my family. I didn’t even need to read the books to know what happens. Everyone talks about it enough. -_-… New Moon comes out today and to celebrate I wore my ‘Real Vampires Don’t Sparkle’ shirt to school. Yes I know that was just asking for trouble, but I got to show who I side with! I got sooo many glares shot at me it wasn’t even funny. But hey, I’m with the Anti Twilight Army. Can’t blame me. Look up our site sometime if you haven’t already.

  1163. iloveyou!
    Posted November 20, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    I really enjoy reading the books, but I do agree that they are way overrated. The literature is definitely not the best, and the characters are somewhat annoying. But, the books are a good read, even though they are not so original. I like the names in the book a lot, and I think that they are super original. Ahh, everyone reading this blog who are freaking out should just quietly exit from the page and calm down. P.S. I mean, the books aren’t THAT bad. The plot is enticing to teenage girls (NOT guys), but the hype over the Twiligh Saga is wayyy too obsessive.

  1164. Posted November 20, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    Haha, I don’t know what made me laugh more, the list or the comments.

    As for the list: Ha. I’ve read the books and I agree with almost everything on the list. Very funny :) .

    As for the comments: You guys make me laugh (excluding the ones not using proper grammar, you make me lose faith in the human race as we abandon correct terms of speaking). By yelling (or typing, rather) at an author for expressing his/or opinion, something that is perfectly acceptable in our society, you are thus voicing an opinion of your own in retaliation. Plus, for those saying the author was ‘rude’ or ‘ignorant’ for disliking something than you are terribly close minded and I recommend some soul searching. And anything for those highly offended by taking this too seriously:

    Humor: \ˈhyü-mər, ˈyü-\: something that is or is designed to be comical or amusing

  1165. HatetheCasting
    Posted November 20, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    I read Online the other day that the actors of the wolf pack in the Twilight Saga films had to show evidence that they were of Native American descent, in a way that’s kinda cool, but if they did that with the wolf pack, why didnt they do the same with the rest of the cast, isnt the Cullen family American Vampires, then why is it that a British actor plays the main male character, It just makes you feel that they didnt bother to look properly for an American actor to play Edward, there are so many good looking American actors out there that could have played Edward and proberbly would have been better. In away I think Stephanie Meyer wanted an English actor cause her fantasy Edward was British actor Henry Cavill, so she chose someone who vaguely looks like him and that is Robert Pattinson, in my opinion Robert Pattinson isnt even all that in the looks department, Henry Cavill would have made a really good Edward too bad he didnt look 17 anymore. If the Twilight Casting were so adament in using a British Actor, here are two that I believe are so Good looking and would have made a more realistic Edward, Ben Barnes and Alex Pettyfer, now they are Gorgeous.
    By the way am British, so don’t think am hating on myself by degrading Robert cause he’s a Brit. Dont get me wrong as a Brit, I am Happy for Robert Pattinson of his success, but I just don’t see him as Edward.
    Got to admit though the story of the Twilight Sag is lame, but can in away see why people like it, cause they want either an Edward or a Jacob.

  1166. Mariyah
    Posted November 20, 2009 at 11:30 pm

    I just think that Twilight is lame, i don’t get how a Dull, not so pretty, very dependent on others and very boring character like Bella has so many guys falling for her, Especially the so called two guys who together would make the Perfect man. What Stephanie Meyer has done is that she has come up with a fantasy of what girls want: two Hot guys fighting over them, then ending up marrying one, having their baby and living with them forever, oh and not to forget the whole vampire and wolf fantasy.
    What’s with the Vampire frenzy now, cause I’ve always like vampire films way before Twilight. Twilight’s Vampire ideology is messed up, how is it that the Twilight Vampires don’t have Vampire teeths, they glow in the sun and that nothing can kill them, but their own vampire species, the Volturi, that is so Ridiculous, Everyone knows thats in the Vampire Mythology, Vampire’s have two long canine teeth, so they can suck people’s blood and the sun kills them, thats why they are vampires, DUH. Stephanie Meyer is just messing up the vampire mythology, its ridiculous.
    Before Twilght came out, I really liked watching Vampire films and Series, cause I use to watch Buffy the Vampire Slayer & Angel, and watched films like Interview with a Vampire and Underworld. And now if anyone metions Vampires, they automatically think am into Twilight, but NO am not cause its Lame.

    I’m with S.W.A.T.
    Strong
    Women
    Against
    Twilight

    P.S. I agree with the comment’s made by ‘HatetheCasting’, getting a British Actor to play an American Vampire, but then making sure all the actors playing the Wolfs are of Native American Descent, they’re kinda contradicting themselves there, with the casting, and I don’t think Robert Pattinson is all that either.

  1167. Mariyah
    Posted November 20, 2009 at 11:31 pm

    I just think that Twilight is lame, i don’t get how a Dull, not so pretty, very dependent on others and very boring character like Bella has so many guys falling for her, Especially the so called two guys who together would make the Perfect man. What Stephanie Meyer has done is that she has come up with a fantasy of what girls want: two Hot guys fighting over them, then ending up marrying one, having their baby and living with them forever, oh and not to forget the whole vampire and wolf fantasy.
    What\’s with the Vampire frenzy now, cause I’ve always like vampire films way before Twilight. Twilight’s Vampire ideology is messed up, how is it that the Twilight Vampires don\’t have Vampire teeths, they glow in the sun and that nothing can kill them, but their own vampire species, the Volturi, that is so Ridiculous, Everyone knows thats in the Vampire Mythology, Vampire’s have two long canine teeth, so they can suck people’s blood and the sun kills them, thats why they are vampires, DUH. Stephanie Meyer is just messing up the vampire mythology, its ridiculous.
    Before Twilght came out, I really liked watching Vampire films and Series, cause I use to watch Buffy the Vampire Slayer & Angel, and watched films like Interview with a Vampire and Underworld. And now if anyone metions Vampires, they automatically think am into Twilight, but NO am not cause its Lame.

    I\’m with S.W.A.T.
    Strong
    Women
    Against
    Twilight

    P.S. I agree with the comment\’s made by ‘HatetheCasting’, getting a British Actor to play an American Vampire, but then making sure all the actors playing the Wolfs are of Native American Descent, they\’re kinda contradicting themselves there, with the casting, and I don\’t think Robert Pattinson is all that either.

  1168. Christine Boulton
    Posted November 21, 2009 at 9:29 am

    This was incredibly funny. I haven’t read the books, never was that interested, however i did see the twilight movie, and i enjoyed it. I am looking forward to watching New moon on Monday. I am not however FREAKING out about it like the tweens are,(i’m 25) and i am sure i will not be shedding any tears in the theater as well ( i will simply excuse myself and go to the bathroom).

    Its always going to be like this every year the new tweens are going to swoon over the new it boy and girl. I had Devin Sawa, Jtt, Leo DiCaprio, BSB, n sync posters all over my walls it pains me to write that down and admit it, but its true. We all now may not think that the new It Boys and girls are Hot, but i think that’s a good thing because they are Underage!

    loved this blog, but love the movie!

  1169. Molly :)
    Posted November 21, 2009 at 9:48 am

    Oh God, I agree about the word “Chagrin” – far too many times it’s been used. x

  1170. Le'strange
    Posted November 21, 2009 at 10:08 am

    oh my god. twilight people need to grow up. its a free world, with free speech. ranting and raving wont get you anywhere, it only makes you look more childish.

  1171. Viola
    Posted November 21, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    You are absoultely right about this list. First of all people are WAYYYYY exagerating about those books.and yea why did Meyer called it Twilight because Edward grabs the freaking apple when it fell from her.
    And in new moon when Edward left her.. she ran after …( FOR CHRIST SAKE) why the hell is she running after a loser like him ?

  1172. Allie
    Posted November 21, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    THE FOUR BOOKS ONLY DESCRIBE HOW FREAKING EDWARD LOOKS..!!

    BORIIIIIIIIIIING…..!!

    TWILIGHT SAGA = LAME, ANNOYING

  1173. When I was younger and all the girls wanted to be Ballet Dancers, I wanted to be a Vampire (:
    Posted November 21, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    For Gods Sake. Some people love Twilight, some people hate it. Personally I loved the books and think the film(s) have/are going to do them no justice. Same as I loved all the Harry Potter books. But none of the films, in my opinion, did any of the books justice. But that’s MY opinion.
    Stephanie Meyers books are books that every girl has dreamed of reading since they were old enough to comprehend deep emotion. Same as you always wish for your diary or stationery to stay perfect, your drawings to look immaculate.. if you have ever read “Hopscotch and Handbags: The Essential Guide to Being a Girl” by Lucy Mangan (strongly recommend it by the way, left me in stitches, every word was true!) you will understand what I mean when I say every girl has the same thought process, no matter how different or individual we are, we all have at least one similar connection. And Twilight should be one of them. Because no matter who you are, yes, you can put yourself into Bella’s shoes. That’s what makes the books so brilliant. Because you are finally “living” your dream. And I know that some fans do take it to far and stay waiting for thier “Edward” to come. And yes, I’d wish I could find someone like Edward, that would be fantastic. But I’m not stupid enough to mis-understand the fact he is a fictional character, just because Stephanie Meyer has put her own teenage dreams into the book – dreams every girl shares – doesn’t mean that it’s all going to happen. It annoys me how you repeat yourself over and over again. We get the fact that you think it’s stupid he sparkles and the fact he doesn’t have fangs – but seeing as Vampires actually DON’T exist, then who’s to say they don’t wear bunny slippers and have green circles drawn on their faces? Everyone is basing this so called “fact” on previous books that include the “traditional” Vampire. Stephanie made this her own. Also, you clearly haven’t understood the book properly, as it explains why he sparkles and why he finds her fascinating and why he isn’t murderous. I could go on and prove every point you have made wrong, but I’m not going to waste my time any longer.
    Basically, my point is, if you’re going to have the nerve to post your opinion on the internet, make sure it makes sense, you have evidence to prove your point and you don’t keep telling people they’re allowed their own opinion and THEN telling them what to think.
    In short:
    FAIL.

  1174. xxletsgomoshxx
    Posted November 21, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    dude this list cracks me up. in a good way though. because i totally agree with it. the twilight books are amazingly stupid. i’ve read all of them realized oh man these books are horrible.

    they arent just books anymore it’s the new trend.

  1175. temtationable
    Posted November 21, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    Love number 21… so true

    As trashy and horrible as the book is it did get a generation to read.

  1176. THFL
    Posted November 22, 2009 at 12:04 am

    First of all, you must be either pretty bored or pretty stupid to spend so much time writing about something you hate, and NEWS FLASH, the world wan’t made to please everyone and neither was the twilight series. You obviously have the right to an opinion but you have no defense to your arguement especially if you haven’t read the books. I agree that some of the twilight fans are crazy and over-obsessed but I, however, am not one of them. Not to mention, you can’t judge a book by its movie and whats up with comparing it to Harry Potter? Two completely different books, by completely different authors, with completely different plots. I am not a loser who only started “loving” the series after the movies were made. You can hate the series all you want, because it’s only going to make the fans love it more. And who said that it was a “real vampire novel”, it is classified as a teen-romance novel, and it doesn’t have sex in it because it is a teen, not an adult novel. I don’t think you’d like it very much if people went around slamming Harry Potter, so keep your rude opinions to yourself.

  1177. j.smith
    Posted November 22, 2009 at 8:56 am

    I have never read the twilight books, and this pretty much assured that I never will. thank you for saving me the time.

  1178. FYI
    Posted November 22, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    why bother if you hate the books so much?
    I agree with a few of these but… come on rules for vampire storys?
    That would be no better than reading the same story all over again.
    Get a grip, it’s fiction! (OMGNOWAY! :/)

  1179. Black-Yami-Cat
    Posted November 22, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    Couple of posts down:
    “do you make fun of Elves in Lord of the rings because they’re tall and beautiful when honestly in older times elves where either short little things that were closely related to fairies or the little people that help Santa?”

    ACTUALLY, Elves were originally tall, beautiful creatures in folklore, as Tolkien wrote them. Authors like Shakespeare, who wrote comedys, wrote the shory fairy-type elves we see today.

    Get your facts straight.

  1180. JRM
    Posted November 22, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    Awesome. And I agree with every bit of it. Terrible books & because of that, terrible movies.

  1181. Yung Joo
    Posted November 22, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    Thanks so much for writing this; you are completely right.

    I hate Twilight. It’s the worst series of books ever written. Stephanie Meyer is a genius though, because she managed to make millions with almost no effort. However, the means do not justify the end, and the only way I could forgive her for writing such terrible literature is if she donated ALL OF THAT MONEY – plus some more – to charity. But… she probably won’t.

  1182. Thanks
    Posted November 23, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    WOW, how defensive do Twilight fans become, its funny!

    Anyway… Whoever wrote this list, just wanted to say Thanx for the Warning, now I know I won’t be reading the Twilight books, cause I’m really into my literature and I don’t want to read something that people have said is badly written and would proberbly annoy me, so Thanx.

  1183. maddie
    Posted November 23, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    Your reasoning is really stupid. Get over your jealousy issues. Twilight is awesome, so stick that in your back pocket.

  1184. loveanime
    Posted November 23, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    OMG! I respect that this is your opinion now you have to accept mine.

    I bet you spend like 2 weeks figuring out what to write in this list.

    If you hate it so much leave it alone!
    You just wasted like 2 weeks of your life ( that you will never get back) on it.

    So if you do have a life, leave others be and get back to your own.

    Like Twilight or not, you just have to get over it.

    LOVE AND HATE! the only things that humans do right.

  1185. Hilary
    Posted November 23, 2009 at 11:55 pm

    This was one of the funniest things I’ve ever read!! I actually sat throught that piece of crap movie, New Moon, and boy, that’s two hours of my life that I will never get back. I laughed though the whole movie. My greatest wish at the moment is that all of the films spontaneously burst into flames and we could be rid of the second Twilight film.

  1186. 50Reasons
    Posted November 24, 2009 at 6:31 am

    50 Reasons Why I Hate Twilight

    1. The back of the book gives the whole thing away.
    2. You can’t use the word “Twilight” to describe a beautiful time of day anymore.
    3. Girls actually believe that Edward Cullen is real.
    4. There’s a RELIGION about it now.
    5. Edward stalks Bella. He watches her sleep!
    6. Stephenie Myer didn’t tell what anyone in the book looked like except Edward.
    7. He sparkes. Need I say more?
    8. If a vampire goes out in sunlight, it decomposes.
    9. Bella has one flaw, and it makes her cute.
    10. Bella’s only interests are Eddie and Reading.
    11. Bella’s so perfect it’s boring.
    12. Edward leaves her in the middle of a forest alone.
    13. Edward is a fairy with a blood fetish.
    14. Edward is so jealous that he wont even let Bella hang out with her friends.
    15. Edward is like 200 years old and Bella’s like 17. Can you say pedophile?
    16. There is no plot to the book whatsoever.
    17. It seems like Edward’s description was copy-and-pasted all throughout the book.
    18. Out of all the girls who loved him so much, Edward chooses the one who is so plain it hurts and has the voice of a man.
    19. Robert Pattinson doesn’t even LIKE Twlight.
    20. Fangirls.
    21. This book butchered the word “vampire.”
    22. Girls standards are now much higher. Now if their boyfriends don’t sparkle it’s unacceptable.
    23. This book probably killed half of the rainforest along with lots of cuts fuzzy creatures.
    24. If Edward loved her so much he wouldn’t have knocked her up with a killer baby.
    25. Jacob dates the killer baby. WTF?!
    26. Nobody dies. Books need a little DRAMA to make them good.
    27. The book is supposed to seem realistic but I couldn’t relate at all.
    28. Edward isn’t hot.
    29. So Bella gets a papercut and her boyfriend leaves her to commit suicide. That makes perfect sense.
    30. Bella sounds like a man…
    31. Dude. Vampires can’t be near crosses!
    32. Edward wants to kill his own baby.
    33. Bella treats her dad like shit when he didn’t do anything to her.
    34. Vampires sleep. In coffins.
    35. The writing is just horrible.
    36. The economy would be better without this book taking the money out of the pockets of teenage girls.
    37. Vampires kill people! That’s what makes them vampires.
    38. The relationship is totally one-sided. Bella is ga-ga over Edward and he just doesn’t care.
    39. They’re first date was an italian dinner right after Edward admitted that he was stalking Bella.
    40. Bella is more manly than Edward.
    41. My friends have all turned to the dark side and worship Twilight now.
    42. Cullenism is probably bigger than any other religion by now.
    43. Stephanie said in the second book I think that vampires can’t reproduce, so Edward is an exception?
    44. The honeymoon was ALL sex.
    45. The birth scene was GROSS.
    46. Girls these days just can’t get the fact that Eddie is fictional.
    47. No one can drive a silver volvo without girls chasing after it.
    48. I didn’t read far enough for Jacob to admit that he was gay, but I’m almost sure he is.
    49. Does Jacob OWN a shirt?
    50. Edwards eyebrows.

  1187. Posted November 24, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    i’ll get over twilight when you get over santa .Enough said.

  1188. Shanticlare
    Posted November 24, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    Though the book isn’t worth the paper it is written on, you’ve read the whole series…lol.

    It seems you’re just another one of those teeny-bopper girls along with the majority of twilight fans, except you’re the type that is “hip” and “non-conformist”.

    It’s a book…Jesus, get over it. It is not written exceptionally well, nor is it the next Great American Novel. Its grammar is even pretty poor at times. That doesn’t mean the book lacks artistic value. Once you become an adult you’ll realize how pointless your 60 million “Why I Hate Twilight” comments are.

  1189. Posted November 24, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    all your stupid opinions are wrong and u trash the book because you have no life and stephanie meyer may not have written it well, its still and excellent book. So get a life and dont make a website about a book that has sold 70 million copies world wide and has 142.2 million dollars just on opening weekend.

  1190. aperson
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 1:35 am

    At first when I read the quotes I thought they were just a joke, but when I saw they were real I almost fell off the couch laughing. To be fair I know several twilight fans who aren’t that bad, for me the main problem is that the main argument made in defense or as a reason why people love Edward is because he \”hawt\”, I mean really, can\’t they even say plain old \”hot\”. I read the books with probably the speed of an obsessed fan just to find in the end I didn\’t really like them that much and that they were the same as a lot of books out there, but then again, I\’m not a huge vampire or were-creature fan.

    In one point of defenses for the book. When your an immortal a few hundred years isn\’t that big a difference and it\’s probably hard to find someone who\’s close in age to you by mortal standers AND is compatible for you.

    While I do fall into the main age category for obsessed Edward fan-girls I am not one. Edward doesn’t seem all that great a boyfriend by what I\’d look for in a guy. I\’m not into a clingy overprotective guy. I\’d more prefer a guy who will protect me IF I need it but who won’t be overly jelose just because I have guy friends that I talk to or a boyfriend who will constantly put his arm around me, that\’s way to possessive for my liking. Plus I have issues with guys who are perfect. It\’s just plain annoying.

    I am not beyond having crushes on fantasy guys and have had several, and most likely every girl has at some point or another, but I don\’t obsess about them so the whole world can hear, as that gets really irritating.

    I would actually like to find someone who I can have a conversation with about why they like Edward or Twilight and have the conversation be reasanable instead of the normal:

    (person 1)Edward iz the BESTEST because hes ttly HAWT!!! HOW COULD U NOT LUV HIM?!?!
    (person 2)TWILIGHT SUCKS! The writing is bad and Edward\’s a (insert word here) PEDIFILE and STALKER!
    (#1) NO HES NOT!!!HE JUST REALLY LUVS HER!!!
    (#2)YOU HAVE NO TAST AT ALL!
    (#1)NO U HAV NO TAST!

    and soon it sounds like this to most other people:

    WELL NAH!
    WELL NAH NAH!
    WELL NAH TIMES GOOGLE PLEX!

    then poor bystander comes in to break it up it gets injured, yes this has happened to me before. Once one of my friends (anti-Edward) and another girl(pro-Edward) got into a fight over it (pro-Edward attacked anti-Edward) I stepped in to break it up and the pro-Edward turned on me and drew blood. NOT HELPPING HER ARGUMENT!

  1191. Fan but not fanatic.
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 3:54 am

    Martin Luther was a womanizer and cheated on his wife. At least adultery wasn’t presented in the book at all…

  1192. EntertainedElise
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    Oh dear, you poor ignorant blinded teengers. You really do need help. Or perhaps you just need to hit puberty. Either way you need to grow up and grow a brain :)
    I would suggest maybe some education, an actual book, and a real life that isn’t absorbed by teenage vampire romance.
    Obviously there are far too many comments to read all of them, but while scrolling down I did get quite a kick out of one comment. Something about “they don’t have to have fangs, this isn’t Dracula” and “of course she didn’t use the word ’said’ too much, that would just be boring”
    I saw the funniest post on fml.com yesterday. It said (perhaps not in these exact words) “today I realized I am a part of the generation that will be remembered for being obsessed with sparkly vampires”. That was just about the best thing ever.
    According to the first amendment, everyone has the right to freedom of speech, so all you wide-eyed vampire loving little girls need to get over the fact that people like myself are going to bash on you public display of stupidity–not because you love twilight, but the way you defend yourselves and your precious vampire books is nothing short of pathetic.
    Oh and a lesson to all, there is a difference between “your” and “you’re” just in case you were wondering. I do not mean to come off arrogant, just thought you should all have that little lesson so you don’t go off posting things like “your stupid for writing that and you’re opinion doesn’t matter”.

    God America, stop fighting about vampires and go fix your country. In case you haven’t noticed, in REALITY (that’s the actual world, dears) there are far greater issues than who loves Edward more. Why don’t we fix some important things first, then we can all go run around being the awesome vampires we learned how to be in books written by the influential Meyer.

  1193. EntertainedElise
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    *your public display of stupidity.

  1194. Loralie
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    Gosh! I hate these books. I only read the first one and that was it for me. I cannot believe the hype. Don’t people know the difference between good and pure unadulterated crap anymore? I’m a girly girl and I enjoy my romance flicks like any other girl out there… I watched Titanic 10 times and cried 10 times. But come on people… Bella Swann? Really? A vampire who sparkles and has been sniffing her like some kind of bony treat for months? That’s supposed to make me swoon? I’d call an exorcist instead or try to see if they serve the undead with restraining orders… anything, at least get curtains on my window. When I heard that the second volume was about the same idiotic little girl, crying over the same old idiot, while holed up in her daddy’s house like some abandoned puppy, doing nothing with her time except letting creepy freaks make a mess of her useless life… Gee… Popular conception is that it’s only pathetic if you binge on ice-cream and ho-hos and get fat in the process. No it is also pathetic when the only lesson you learned from being dumped by a vampire is that werewolves make better boyfriends. If you are going to give me a female lead character, then please, give me a smart one, one with goals, plans, a life… Not some kind of moronic sissy with daddy issues. ‘Cause it sounds like she’s touring all dark and dangerous places, looking for the guy to give her the spanking and attention she so desperately craves.

    Anyhow, the characters are totally disconnected from the real world. They live in this fantasy world where nobody has ever heard about bills, jobs, college, mortgage, etc… I’m guessing it must not be far from Neverland. And that’s fine… as long as you start your story with “Once upon a time” and make sure it has around 300 pages less than the book Meyer published. If the main character’s mental age isn’t going to budge a little bit (despite several encounters with death, marriage, maternity) and if at 18 she has reached her maximal intellectual ability, then really you can tell her story with 2000 words: Moron meets sparkling doofus. Moron is bored and likes shiny things… But it’s alright ’cause there ain’t no clubs in Forks, no movie theater and moron doesn’t know the way to the library… So… First come-first served. And then the next in line gets some too (in the second volume). That’s not romance; that’s a line at McDonalds and despite what they always say, there will be enough for everybody. You just have to stand in line, stalk her for a couple of months and she will deliver the goods in due time (’cause nothing says “I care” like invading someone’s privacy and acting all possessive about one’s prey… uh woman. I’m telling you, those feminists who marched decades ago wasted their Sunday shoes and their breaths on Stephenie Meyer)

  1195. R
    Posted November 26, 2009 at 2:52 am

    Twilight is not a very good work of literature. I’ve seen critics compare it to works of the Bronte sisters. Really? REALLY?!

    People who read and like the Twilight series and think it is excellent literature are horribly misguided.

    Diane Setterfield. She’s a new author who writes true to the essence of gothic literature and Bronte.

    The fact is, Twilight is an easy read. People who read Twilight will not last reading something that requires thinking and an extensive vocabulary – such as The Thirteenth Tale, A Clockwork Orange, HP Lovecraft, Poe and Jane Erye without consulting Mr. Webster. Yes, I’m generalizing. It’s not that hard. The vampyre mythology has been soiled. Literature itself has been soiled thanks to this steamin pile of crap.

  1196. Martine
    Posted November 26, 2009 at 7:46 am

    I don’t think you particularly hate Twilight. I think there are many people who simply enjoy the snobby appeal of hating Twilight. For some reason they think that hating Twilight is some kind of accomplishment.
    I like Twilight. I think it will stand the test of time, and in years to come will probably be considered great literature. Its unlikely that something could capture the hearts of so many different people for no reason. Obviously Edward isn’t “hot”. He doesn’t look like anything except in the readers mind. The fact that girls think Edward is hot is proof that the writing is great enough that they can actually “see” him. That already means that the writer has the skill to capture the imagination with a lot of force.
    Not only is Bella no Mary Sue, but she is an amazing character. Very different then those I have seen in romance lit. She is hardly perfect. Sure she is far from average, but then who says she has to be. One thing I love about Bella is that unlike the typical vampire romance heroines who have a one liner and a stake gun ready for all who would dare stand against their wit or their might, she loves with honor. Todays Mary Sues are girls like Buffy, Sookie and Anita Blake. I love all of them, but they are so interchangeable that I would bet you could switch them around without disturbing the storyline. They are powerful and self centered, and they play hard to get even when there is no reason. Bella doesn’t. I find that enormously refreshing. Sure telling a sexy, powerful vampire that you do not want him and making him prove that he needs you desperately feels good, and vicariously we love it. But its playing hard to get, which is sort of cheap, and it lessens you as a person. Bella is always in love with Edward. She doesn’t make him beg or earn affection when they reunite. She knows how she feels, and what she wants. That is real strength. I find that she is a great role model, and very new and honorable kind of hero. I also loved that she wanted to become immortal. I have never understood just why the typical romance girl always had to put on that “I just want a normal life” BS. I didn’t ever buy it. Just more playing hard to get if you ask me. If it was me, Id be forcing a vampire to make me young forever. Thats honest. I have absolutely no objection to Bella being well above average. Don’t tell me you think that Buffy, Anita, MIna or Sookie are any less perfect. they are all intelligent, resourceful, beautiful, beloved by all, bla, blah, blah. If someone lives for hundreds of years they probably get picky and only like exceptional girls. But, unlike the rest of these ladies, Bella is consistent in her love, and honest about her feelings and her needs. To me that makes her a winner.

  1197. Lolli
    Posted November 26, 2009 at 8:28 am

    Im really not sure I understand why people think Twilight is a manual for how to have a healthy relationships. Its a love story. No love story worth writing about is particularly healthy. Romeo and Juliet were teenagers that were so obsessively in love that they killed themselves. Shakespeare wasn’t trying to say thats how he thought people should have relationships. He was trying to say that love is not logical, and feelings often override what “should” be done. Lizzie Bennett and Lord Darcy heaped abuse on each other and Lizzie was such a know-it-all at 23 that she figured she could correctly judge people as soon as she met them. She was wrong, and only the fact that Darcy seemed to like abuse saved her and her sister from sad, ruined lives. That is from Pride and Prejudice in case you guys didn’t know.
    Twilight has moderately healthy interaction between Bella and Edward. He is protective, but he recognizes it as a fault. His main goal is to protect her from harm, including himself. There is no hint of abusiveness in his behavior. In fact he is his own worst critic. He feels that he is a threat to her, and that he could devour her. But it is clear to Bella and to Alice, who knows the future that he is incapable of hurting her. He is a threat to her in his mind only. He proves that he is willing to leave her if necessary for her safety or her happiness. Contrast to Jacob, who loves her, but is more selfish. He asks Bella to stay in Forks, even though he knows that if Bella let Edward die she would be sad for the rest of her life. Unlike Edward, Jacob would be OK if he had Bella, even if she was broken.
    Bella feels empty without Edward, and he feels empty without her. Thats just honest, realistic description of very strong love. You can’t chose how you feel.
    Bella is very strong person emotionally. Edward never forces her choices. The only thing that he tries to force is for her to remain human. When he does this, she goes over his head and tells his family to choose. In the end he gives in to her. True he is stronger because she is human, and he is a vampire, but she does everything she can to become equal to him, and in the end she does so. Even as a human she had the ability to protect her thoughts from him. He first becomes intrigued because of her ability to stand up to him in a way. To prevent his mind reading.

  1198. Lolli
    Posted November 26, 2009 at 8:38 am

    Its me, Lolli again. I have one more thing to say; Its funny, but the things people say about Twilight sound an awful lot like the stuff people in the 1950’s said about Rock and Roll music. I know its a stretch, but things like “No one will even remember this in a few years” and “Only silly teenagers like it” and “It can’t compare to real classics”. Im not saying that Twilight is going to start a genre, because the genre is already here. I will bet that in a few decades tho when people think of the 2000-2015 or so, they will remember the humanizing of literary horror figures, and will still be reading Twilight both for enjoyment, and as a way to understand our times.

  1199. Louise
    Posted November 26, 2009 at 8:48 am

    I have read and enjoyed almost anything I have had the fortune to get my hands on in my twenty years of life. An early love of reading coupled with three years of clinical insomnia will do that to you. The only book I have failed to finish to date is the Bible. (But that’s a whole other debate.)

    I’m not going to blah blah on about how amazing Twilight is and so on, I just feel compelled to comment on this one, insignificant point.

    “11.Edward is too perfect and has no flaws either. Even vampires should have flaws besides wanting to suck human blood because it’s natural to them.”

    and followed shortly by,

    “19.Edward is extremely possessive, border-line abusive, and boring as anything.”

    Not only are these points clearly conflicting, but they hint that perhaps Ms Meyer was aiming for something a little more complex than girl-meets-vampire-love-problems-love-the end.
    Part of the point of the book is as perfect as Edward seems in the beginning, as the story progresses, the reader begins to realise (or SHOULD anyway) that Edward is not in fact perfect, he has insecurities and a whole metaphorical warehouse full of issues. Issues that are human, despite the fact that he has ceased to be.

    Sometimes I wonder if I read too much into things, that my brain spins an intricate web of complexity for my own enjoyment, or simply that a billion teenage girls are missing the entire point of the Twilight series. It’s about sacrificing part of yourself for love, whether you are willing to or not.

    Sorry to intrude.

  1200. Lolli
    Posted November 26, 2009 at 9:56 am

    Everyone has the right to their likes and dislikes. No one will try to force you to like Twilight. But people have the right to enjoy Twilight without being insulted. You don’t have the right to enforce your opinions on others. Banning books hasn’t happened since Nazi Germany, and it sure isn’t going to happen now. But thats a good example. Thats just what a lot of you people are sounding like. Maybe get some perspective, and instead of making other sane people miserable, figure out just why it is that this book, which has no objectionable thoughts in it, makes you so angry. When people are that angry, they are usually angry at themselves and their own lives.
    To answer the crazy girl above;
    1. Forks is a real town in the Pacific Northwest. It is named after a fork in the road, not a fork like the utensil, Genius.
    2. Vampires are obviously not dead. They are nonexistent, so their biology is up to each individual writer.
    3. There are pelicans in the town of Forks. Pelicans are in most coast towns.
    4. There is no point to attempting to make a book illegal because you don’t like it.
    5. Im sure most Twilight fans are getting tired of venomous little turds.
    6. I think that men and women of all ages have become suicidal because a loved one left them. Pretending that doesn’t happen is not going to help them or anyone else. If writers all were forced to write about people acting with your idea of the perfect emotions all the time, the only person that would enjoy reading would be you. Not needing to be loved is impossible. Humans do need love. Its very rare for people to be just fine alone. Breaking up with the love of your life hurts. You are probably young, and maybe it hasn’t happened to you, but its a very awful feeling. I can easily imagine feeling that you want to die rather then go on feeling that kind of pain. Thats not a fairy tale. thats the truth.
    7. Edward never once told Bella what to do, or where to go. Anyone that says that hasn’t read the books. Only thing he did try to force on her is to NOT become a vampire. And she did not listen to him. She made his family vote so they would turn her if he did not. The book has no abusive behavior in it. The closest to abusive is Jacob, who tries to force Bella to not be with Edward, and forces a kiss on her. But he knew it was wrong.
    8. No one is taught that there is some one out there for some of us that we can’t live without. Sometimes it just happens. It isn’t unrealistic in any way. It happens all the time.
    9. The book deals with very realistic situations of jobs, school and everyday life. They deal with the realities of life both in the town, and on the reservation very well. They also deal with the fact that sometimes you need to chose between your husband and the family you will make with him, and your parents. Sometimes they are incompatible. Thats reality too.

  1201. ERGUE
    Posted November 26, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    I’ve read the list and most of the comments, I’ve also read the first book and watched the first movie. I agree with some, I don’t with others. I don’t love it but neither do I hate it (I think hate or love are way too powerful emotions over something like this) If I had to choose a side, however, I would most definetely be on the anti-Twilight group.. why? simply because, it worries me what most of this whole twilight-loving generation, admires and looks up to in role models and relationships.. I sort of understand the whole “dream-fantasy-girl-wants-really-hot-and-perfect-guy-drooling-for-her-thing” but it’s already at the point of being borderline ridiculous and way too exagerated…

    Martine, I loved your comment, unfortunately I disagree with it.. I honestly don’t consider Twilight a good work of literature but more of a trend that will pass by and be remembered ocasionally (hopefully)… no, I’m not a writer, it’s just my opinion.

    Edward IS hot, the author made sure of that in the literally, dozens of descriptions of the character, it really comes to a point that you say “I KNOW HE’S HOT STOP ALREADY”, once again, in my opinion, I don’t think thats skillful writing, on the contrary, the author had to make sure people knew he was really “hot”, truly skillful writers don’t need that, and that’s only ONE aspect of her writing. Once again, not a writer, just my opinion.

    I’m not familiar with Sookie or Anita Blake, but I am with Buffy. I watched the entire Buffy series, and although I agree that she is far from being a great character, and yes it’s also teen oriented-not-to-be-taken-that-seriously, she came off to me as more human, so to say. She had her flaws, dreams, thoughts, she loved, she hated, she was afraid of death and yes, she had the whole “I want a normal life” thing but because that life she was living was imposed on to her. In fact, to me, Spike was a truly great character of that series, you could actually sit back and watch as he evolved and redeemed himself during the course of the series. I don’t see any of that in Bella, I agree however, that Bella knows what she wants, but it’s what she wants (a truly co-dependent and obsessive fixation) what troubles me. She doesn’t want anything more out of life, no ambition, no dreams, no nothing, except being with her “Edward” and to be taken care of by him. I really don’t consider that real strength, not I consider her as a winner, in fact, I think those are contradictions. Now I understand why a lot of women are saying, “this book set back what women have fought for in decades”. And the fact that women and men (yes men you read correctly) admire that, it hits me as, well, wrong… don’t you?

    I have no problem whatsoever if people take it, as in my opinion should have been, really-light-I-don’t-have-to-think-that-hard reading, it’s entertaiment value is high enough to keep you interested but that’s it, nothing more, something to kill time with. Same goes for the movies, whether they do, or do not, make justice to the books.

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion, I respect that. Like I said before, it worries me that people, specially young people, just aspire? and actually hope and beg for a twilight-relationship to come into their lives, I mean is that what we have now? My hope, is that people will just “grow” out of this…

    I apologize if my grammar isn’t good enough… English is not my mother language and I thank you for your time. Cya.

  1202. Sarah
    Posted November 27, 2009 at 1:17 am

    what would Stephen King know.. hes a crap writer..

  1203. Lily
    Posted November 27, 2009 at 2:00 am

    elise

    it’s a fictional book honey, don’t get so worked up.. ! :)

  1204. Whocares?
    Posted November 27, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    …Its pretty obvious that Sarah, the publisher of this, and ‘50reaons’ have not read the books. I’m pretty sure that ‘50 reasons only watched the movie, if that.
    Meyer is writing for a SIXTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL’S POINT OF VIEW. How would a 16 year old girl think, act, feel, ect?
    Maybe you need to read the books….ALL FOUR of them because its quiet obvious you did not…..

  1205. EntertainedElise
    Posted November 27, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    Lily, I am quite calm in fact :)
    thank you for the concern though.

  1206. Maggie
    Posted November 27, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    I agree with most of your points.
    When I was 15 years old I wasn’t as retarded, empty and shallow as Bella is (I don’t see ANY character development on her part)…that’s why I’m very suprirsed and almost scared that so many girls can relate to these books. I don’t see anything in them past Bella being an idiot and living a romance with a god-like vampire that has absolutely no flaws…and I’m surprised that that’s what girls love in him so much, that he is perfect. That’s almost ridiculous. I remember being in one of my classes when the first movie was going to come out and there were three girls talking about how Robert Pattinson was not even close as to how handsome and perfect Edward is supposed to look. What do you want me to think? If that’s what they cared about the most. Ugh…I don’t hate Twilight out of jealousy (I find it very ridiculous when fans defend the series saying that) you should just accept that we’re all different and we all have different opinions …this is mine. Saying that Twilight makes children read…is almost sad. What are they going to gain from it? If you’re an older person this might just entertain you and that’s it…but if you’re a teenager girl, I don’t even want to think what they’re getting from it.

  1207. lily
    Posted November 27, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    elise
    not concerned.. entertained…like you ! you do sound pretty ticked off.. not really worth the energy sweetheart :)
    people will read what they will read..

  1208. dee
    Posted November 27, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    I got bored of this after reading the blurb, THE BLURB!

  1209. Viki
    Posted November 28, 2009 at 2:35 am

    You’re so right! I hate how people say that all teen girls love *gag* twilight. I’m a 13 year old girl, love to read, love vampires, but hate this damn movie. Oh, and I want to be a writer. On a lighter note, my favorite reason is “Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.” DEATH NOTE RULES!

  1210. EntertainedElise
    Posted November 28, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    Lily:
    Haha okay then :) whatever you say “sweetheart”
    I’m just saying I think the entire thing is idiotic. But people will read what they read.

    On the topic of Harry Potter, JK Rowling is incredible. End of story. I’m not saying amazing COMPARED to Stephanie Meyer, but amazing in general.
    …..if we were to compare the two, Rowling would kick Meyer’s sparkly ass in a matter of seconds. In fact, I dont think it’s even possible to compare the two!

  1211. Emmy
    Posted November 29, 2009 at 4:45 am

    AMEN to your list lol!

  1212. Posted November 29, 2009 at 4:58 am

    ‘times elves where either short little things that were closely related to fairies or the little people that help Santa?”

    Actually your wrong.

    Can I call you a moron now?

    THe old legend had elves always being dangerous fey, not stupid little short people with tinkly shoes.

  1213. ella
    Posted November 30, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    YES FINALLY SOMEONE WHO DISLIKE THOSE BOOKS AS MUCH AS I DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  1214. Kay
    Posted November 30, 2009 at 9:11 pm

    Love the list. Bonus points for mentioning Light Yagame. I was just going to read it and move along, but it’s because of that that I had to comment. Deathnote. <3

  1215. Circles
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 3:27 am

    The thing I hate most about it all, is the fact that it completely ruined vampires.
    As far as I can tell, the only way to undo this literary damage would be for some enlightened person to write a rival vampire novel, hopefully one that portrays vampires in a far less flattering light…
    Of course; I’m talking about a vampire rapist, except most Twilight fans would probably be quite happy in the arms of a vampire rapist.
    Heck, Edward Cullen practically was one.

  1216. dotdotdot
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 4:25 am

    The popularity of a book depends on the people, and Twilight is what the people currently want.
    and at ‘dontmindme’, if a Book series ruined thousands of relationships, then the relationships can’t have been all that good could they? If they were ruined by a book about sparkly vampires that you think is actually crap and ‘taboo’!
    I neither love nor hate Twilight. I accept that there are flaws in the book, and that it’s not exactly educationally stimulating, but what do you expect?!
    It’s a book aimed to sell, not to educate.
    AND IT’S SELLING SO GET OVER IT.
    What with all the hating and controversy about Twilight, no wonder it’s reeling in the cash-you’re just giving it more publicity. And someone above me said that Harry potter was way better than Twilight, and then went on to mention that they HADN’T EVEN READ IT.
    Stop judging and jumping to conclusions about Twilight.
    No book is ever going to be liked by EVERYONE. Everyone’s different, so accept that some people like the book and some people don’t.
    Also, you shouldn’t generalize the whole group of Twilight fans by 3 comments on a fan page. Believe me, there’s plenty of people who hate Twilight and who are just as psychotic as Twilight lovers!

    Go write a better book and we’ll see how well you do!

  1217. Carolina
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:29 am

    *Aplauses* daaamn your amazing ! this just made my day. I agree with everysingle thing. The only character i actually enjoyed was Jacob , he kinda has a personality but Miss Meyer thought it wasn’t enough so made him a werewolf. My friends made me go watch the movie with them . The first 5 minutes i laugh so hard! i couldn’t stop! sparkling vampires are just oh god i cant even find words !
    After readind the books i had to read dear Lestat de Lioncourt just to recover sanity

    Awesome work =D
    P.S-Sorry for any writing error, english is not my native language.

  1218. ottis
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    The only reason any guy would go see twilight would be to get some action from the exited 13 year old girls in the theater.

  1219. Philip
    Posted December 2, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    i agree that everyone is entitled to their opinion and all that crap but voicing ur opinion on the internet will never change anyone elses opinion. i’m really hoping that some day people will finally figure that out.

    p.s. i dont actually like twilight so dont pin my reaction on that

    p.p.s. yes i realise i just voiced my opinion on the internet

  1220. Win!
    Posted December 2, 2009 at 6:23 pm

    Naa. I’m not a fan of Twilight, and I honestly think it sounds worse then some of the stuff I wrote in 4th grade. Using a thesaurus doesn’t make a story.
    I like this list, it’s funny. Funny because it’s true.
    I hate how all my friends get all wrapped up in the Team Jacob or Team Edward crap. People go and buy the t-shirts, the makeup (yeah. Twilight makeup.), all dump money in Smeyer’s lap. Just goes to show that, regardless of a poor plot, a cliche wording, and general suckyness, adolecsent girls (who’s parents pay for 80% of the clothing economy) are the ones who drive this money-maker along.
    Its just because people get wrapped up in the name “Twilight” versus the actual story.
    Sigh…
    Your list brightened my day. :)

  1221. Mor
    Posted December 2, 2009 at 7:51 pm

    You are my new personal jesus!
    I’ll follow you till death!!
    all twilight fan should suffer a slow and painfull death….

  1222. kurtzthegreat
    Posted December 3, 2009 at 12:25 am

    its books like twilight that are destroying our society. so manny people waste their time reading stupid books like twilight and watch reality tv shows, that time could be better spent studying or doing something productive

  1223. philip
    Posted December 3, 2009 at 6:37 am

    Mor
    Posted December 2, 2009 at 7:51 pm
    You are my new personal jesus!
    I’ll follow you till death!!
    all twilight fan should suffer a slow and painfull death….

    apparently its not jus twilight fans who can over-react and get borderline psychotic about who they are gonna follow

  1224. Claudiarocks11
    Posted December 3, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    Ok, this is for all the Twi-Hards here. I’ll admit I wasn’t too convinced by this list as I was for other anti-twilight lists, but I absolutely hate twilight and I think there are some HUGE reaons why it sucks. So here’s some different opinion, posted from the Anti Twilight Movemet.com. (btw, this is not posted BY the Anti-Twilight Movement, or any of its affiliates, so please don’t blame them for posting this). Anyways, this is a direct quote from said website. Enjoy, and please consider the argument.

    In the last few years, the book “Twilight” by Stephenie Meyer has become overwhelmingly popular among the general population, teenagers especially. The book is about a teenage girl named Bella who moves to the town of Forks, Washington, where she meets and falls madly in love with a teenage vampire named Edward. Seems innocent, right? Not quite. So why hate “Twilight”, you ask? Many reasons. For your reading convenience we’ve split them up into four categories: Poor Writing, Relationships, Common Arguments, and “True Love”.

    POOR WRITING.

    Meyer writes at an amateur level- constantly abusing a thesaurus with shameless purple prose. She takes simple, elementary sentences and stuffs them with an overabundance of modifiers. Example:

    “His skin, white despite the faint flush from yesterday’s hunting trip, literally sparkled, like thousands of tiny diamonds were embedded in the surface. He lay perfectly still in the grass, his shirt open over his sculpted, incandescent chest, his scintillating arms bare. His glistening, pale lavender lids were shut, though of course he didn’t sleep. A perfect statue, carved in some unknown stone, smooth like marble, glittering like crystal.”

    There are 69 words in that short excerpt; 18 of which are adjectives/adverbs; 5 of which are synonyms for the same word: sparkling. But that’s nothing: the word “murmur” is used 46 times in the first book alone. Nice way to use imagination instead of repetitiveness, right? Meyer’s constant massacre of words is a fast way to fill up pages, but leaves absolutely no room for plot, character development, or any kind of quality.
    Acclaimed author Stephen King recently gave his opinion on Meyer, comparing her to Harry Potter author J. K. Rowling. According to King, “Both Rowling and Meyer, they’re speaking directly to young people… The real difference is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephenie Meyer can’t write worth a darn. She’s not very good.”
    This is not an exaggeration. Meyer, who has had no previous experience in writing, is exactly that: inexperienced. Although the Twilight “saga” isn’t written terribly, it is written very simply, with amateur writing style, forced vocabulary, and an over-all lack of deepness and literary quality.

    In the words of an English teacher who agreed to read the first book, “The books are drivel. There’s no substance.” While there’s nothing wrong with empty, simple writing, it should be recognized for what it is: empty and simple, and not, in any way, “the best book ever written”, or even “a well written book”.

    RELATIONSHIPS.

    Edward and Bella have a disturbingly abusive relationship, which Meyer condones and even celebrates as an ultimate form of romance. However there’s nothing “romantic” about stalking and abuse. An abusive relationship is characterized by jealousy, sexual coercion, verbal abuse, control games, and power plays. Twilight proudly displays all of these. Examples:

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward is jealous of Jacob, to the tune of actively preventing Bella from having even a friendship with him (which he does by stealing the engine out of her car to prevent her from leaving. He admits after the engine episode that the main reason for not wanting Bella to see Jacob was in fact his jealousy). Abuse red flag number one.

    ♦ ♦ ♦-He bribes his sister to put Bella under house arrest while he is gone, so as to keep her under a watchful eye.

    ♦♦ ♦- Edward manipulates Bella into marriage by refusing her wish for intimacy and telling her he will not allow them to have a physical relationship unless she marries him (even though Bella has expressed a strong distaste for marriage at her age, arguing that they are too young).

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward is in complete control of their physical intimacy, while Bella has virtually no say. He controls when and how long Bella is allowed to kiss him, and systematically rejects Bella’s affection when she tries to act on her own. The fact that later he withholds sex, something which Bella wishes for, “for her own protection” is not only a clear example of sexual coercion, but also an insult to Bella. Is she not mature and intelligent enough to know what she wants?

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward isolates Bella from her friends, and encourages her to leave them, calling them “shallow”, then abandons her. At that time, he tells her “you aren’t good enough”, in blatant disregard for how this is going to hurt her. In abandoning her, he forbids her best friend- Alice- from seeing her.

    ♦ ♦ ♦”I couldn’t live without you.” Edward attempts suicide over Bella, telling her beforehand that he’s planning on doing so. Control tactic.

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward encourages Bella to lie to her father about seeing him, and furthermore sneaks around Charlie’s back in order to see Bella after curfew and before Charlie knew about the relationship.

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward frightens Bella unnecessarily with his vampirism but does not take steps to ensure her safety. He constantly reminds her that if he wanted to, he could crush her, and she wouldn’t have a chance.

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward does not allow Bella to make her own decisions or to disagree with him. In the beginning of New Moon, Edward hides, takes, or destroys all her possessions that are associated with him, without her permission or even her knowledge. He takes Bella’s belongings that are associated with him in an effort to control her healing process. But Bella is in charge of how she deals with the loss. Edward had no right to act for her.

    ♦-Edward watches Bella while she sleeps (during entire nights, weeks at a time). Even before Bella is aware that he is doing so. Without so much as acquiring permission, he sneaks into her house through her bedroom window to spy on her. A violation of privacy.

    Lucy Mangan wrote an article for The Guardian entitled ‘Dangerous Liaisons” that explained this further:

    “It sounds melodramatic and shrill to say that Bella and Edward’s relationship is abusive, but as the story wears on it becomes increasingly hard to avoid the comparison, as she gradually isolates herself from her friends to protect his secret, and learns to subordinate her every impulse and movement to the necessity of not upsetting Edward and his instincts (”I could quite easily kill you, Bella, by accident”), until by halfway through she is trying to suppress her very pulse (”my blood was racing and I wished I could slow it, sensing that this must make everything so much more difficult”) and planning her movements like a chess game – “I worried that it would provoke the strange anger that flared whenever I slipped and revealed too clearly how obsessed I was.” Whenever she responds physically to his kisses, he immediately draws away and berates her. Supporters will call this the erotics of abstinence. I call it fear and distaste for female sexuality and a poisonous message to be feeding young women.
    Edward, of course, has warned her not to be alone with him. He warns her constantly (in between praising her for the quietness with which she absorbs the latest revelation about his true vampiric nature) that she rouses him to such a pitch that he can barely contain himself. To Meyer and her legions of fans, this is evidence of his virtuous, gentlemanly nature. To those less enamoured of Meyerworld, the implication is that Bella chooses to put herself in danger and the further implication is that she must therefore bear full responsibility for the consequences (which, in the way of vampire romances, are not entirely confined to hugs and puppies). When she once confesses that she did find one of his outbursts of temper terrifying, he responds “You need a healthy dose of fear. Nothing could be more beneficial for you.” To some, this counts as further proof that he wants to protect Bella from herself. To others, it all smacks uncomfortably of the “asking for it” defence. To the older and/or more savvy reader, Edward is less an ideal boyfriend than a proto-rapist.

    Edward is no hero. Bella is no Buffy. And Twilight’s underlying message – that self-sacrifice makes you a worthy girlfriend, that men mustn’t be excited beyond a certain point, that men with problems must be forgiven everything, that female passivity is a state to be encouraged – are no good to anyone. It should be staked through its black, black heart.”

    COMMON ARGUMENTS.

    -Edward didn’t mean to hurt her.
    But he did hurt her. We can’t rationalize abuse, even if it is not consciously intentional.

    -Edward is jealous of Jacob because he’s a dangerous werewolf- remember Emily.
    And remember that unnamed “singer” girl that Emmet killed? Jacob is dangerous. Edward is also, if not more, dangerous. Double standards.

    -Edward doesn’t encourage her to lie to Charlie- he asks her to tell Charlie that they’re seeing each other.
    He asks her to tell Charlie so he’ll have “some small incentive” not to kill her- that is, so he’ll get in trouble if her hurts her. Since Bella has shown a strong disregard for her own safety, this isn’t a compelling argument. Further, his actions in sneaking around Charlie’s back both before and after curfew was instated demonstrate a real disregard for any sense of openness between Bella and her father.

    -Edward scares Bella to make her understand the danger.
    No matter what the reason, it isn’t right to try and frighten your girlfriend. She knows he’s dangerous and can decide to take that risk for herself.

    -Edward tries to act in Bella’s own interests.
    Which he attempts by taking away Bella’s independence and free will. Also, by acting against her will or, in cases, without her permission or knowledge (which he claims is “for her own good”), Edward is directly insulting Bella by insinuating that she isn’t intelligent enough to make her own decisions, and is too weak-willed to know what she wants. Bella, for all her flaws, is her own person; no one, even her “lover”, has the right to tell her what she thinks and what she wants.

    -Edward’s attempted suicide proves he loves her- it’s not a control tactic.
    Killing yourself over someone does not prove you love them, it proves that you need mental help. And teaching a preteen that suicide is romantic will not lead anywhere good.

    -Edward committed suicide because he thought Bella was dead. It can’t have been an attempt to control her.
    But he told her that he was going to commit suicide beforehand- and that makes it a suicide threat, which is a characteristic of abusers. Some of them are unstable enough to go through with it. Plus, even if his suicide is contingent on her death rather than her absence, it’s still imposing her decisions by making her re-evaluate the daily risks that she’s willing to take.

    -But it promotes abstinence, and that’s good, right?
    Wrong. The only reason they stay abstinent is because Edward tells Bella that he would crush her bones with his pelvis if they even tried – once again holding the fact over her that he is stronger than her, and has the ability to hurt her. Which brings up another topic: why is it alright for them to have sex after they’re married, since even after marriage, Bella will still be human and easily hurt? Edward proclaims more than once that he has no intention of turning Bella into a vampire. Which leaves his excuse for withholding sex as “for her own protection” paper thin. (Later, after they marry and have sex, Bella does, in fact, get hurt.)
    The mere fact that it is supposedly Edward’s job to “protect Bella’s virtue” (even when Bella herself has decided she is ready for a sexual relationship) furthers the stereotype that women are typical, weak-willed, seductive destroyers-of-man’s-morals, who needs to be kept in line because they can’t control themselves. If anything, it should be the woman who protects her “virtue”, not her boyfriend. Teenage girls, especially, should learn that it is their own job to protect themselves. “Edward” may be opposed to pre-marital sex, but it’s likely that most boyfriends of teenage girls are not. The message that “your boyfriend knows what’s best for you and your relationship” is, in fact, a very dangerous message to be sending.

    -At least it has kids reading.
    This argument is about as useful as giving a starving child a head of lettuce- sure, it’s “food”, but it has no nutritional value. Sure, Twilight is a book, but what good is it if it has no value? The action of reading isn’t in itself good- it’s the material being read.

    TRUE LOVE?

    Meyer tells us that Bella and Edward have true love. They are soul mates. Bella’s lifeblood—her very essence—sings to Edward’s soul. However a meaningful relationship is never built between them. After knowing him from afar for only a few days, Bella decides she is in “love” with Edward. However this “love” is never explained beyond Bella’s fascination with Edward’s good looks. Let’s break it down into how many times these attributes are described in the first book alone:

    ♦Face: 24
    ♦Voice: 20
    ♦Eyes: 17
    ♦Movement: 11
    ♦Smile: 10
    ♦Teeth: 8
    ♦Muscles: 7
    ♦Skin: 7 (Note: This only contains accounts of Edward’s skin being beautiful. I didn’t count references to it as “pale,” “cold,” or “white.” If I had, this number would be about ten times larger.)
    ♦Iron Strength or Limbs: 5
    ♦Breath: 4
    ♦Scent: 4
    ♦Laughter: 3
    ♦Chest: 2
    All of these are mentioned (numerously), but his personality is never listed as a reason for her love. Bella does not, in fact, ever make note of his personality. Her only describing words of him are as follows, along with the number of times each word appears.
    ♦Hard- 109
    ♦Angel- 84
    ♦Cold- 65
    ♦Perfect – 59
    ♦White- 52
    ♦Soft- 48
    ♦Beautiful- 36
    ♦Cool- 33
    ♦Pale- 30
    ♦Stone- 29
    ♦Marble- 9
    ♦Dazzling- 8
    ♦Wry- 6
    ♦Statue- 7
    ♦Flawless- 6
    ♦Godlike- 6
    ♦Adonis- 2
    Sounds like a pretty deep relationship, doesn’t it?

    The only conversations Bella and Edward hold together are discussions of how dangerous he is, how easily he could hurt her, and how temping her smell is. They know nothing of each other outside of the realm of physical attributes, and discuss nothing more than Edward’s power.
    When Bella decides she is in love with Edward, she still has no idea who he is, what he’s like, or what his personality is (too bad the reader never finds out either). Yet somehow she starts to revolve her entire life around him in an unhealthy fit of obsession (abandoning her friends to spend time with him, lying to her father to sneak out with him, controlling her breathing and pulse so as not to “tempt” him). The short amount of time in which Bella claims to “fall in love” with a person she knows next to nothing about creates the disillusion that “true love” is obtained effortlessly in a matter of days; further demeaning the very concept of “love”.

    When Edward leaves Bella in the second book, her life falls apart and she begins purposely putting herself in dangerous and potentially life-threatening situations in order to bring him back, or at the very least, bring his voice back (when she puts herself in danger she can mentally hear Edward’s voice scolding her; something Meyer tries to convey as normal and even a useful way to cope with emotional pain). Eventually Edward returns after Bella throws herself off a cliff, bringing them back together again. After this happens, Meyer makes no effort to discourage this behavior as something unreasonable, but as something that will be effective. What does this teach young girls? That their lives depend on their boyfriends? That nothing else in their lives should matter as much as their relationship? That they should compromise their own safety to draw the attention of a lover? Some young, impressionable teenage girls that read these books have started to believe that this is the “perfect” relationship. This should not only concern parents, but disturb them.

    So why do we care so much anyway?

    Because it’s indicative of a pattern in society to idealize unhealthy and abusive relationships. This book teaches our generation that abusive relationships are okay– no, ROMANTIC, even. Not only is this book a moral threat to our youth, but an assault on literature itself. It’s unoriginal, amateur, openly abusive, and dare I say it, sexist.

  1225. Claudiarocks11
    Posted December 3, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    Ok, this is for all the Twi-Hards here. I\’ll admit I wasn\’t too convinced by this list as I was for other anti-twilight lists, but I absolutely hate twilight and I think there are some HUGE reaons why it sucks. So here\’s some different opinion, posted from the Anti Twilight Movemet.com. (btw, this is not posted BY the Anti-Twilight Movement, or any of its affiliates, so please don\’t blame them for posting this). Anyways, this is a direct quote from said website. Enjoy, and please consider the argument.

    In the last few years, the book \”Twilight\” by Stephenie Meyer has become overwhelmingly popular among the general population, teenagers especially. The book is about a teenage girl named Bella who moves to the town of Forks, Washington, where she meets and falls madly in love with a teenage vampire named Edward. Seems innocent, right? Not quite. So why hate \”Twilight\”, you ask? Many reasons. For your reading convenience we\’ve split them up into four categories: Poor Writing, Relationships, Common Arguments, and \”True Love\”.

    POOR WRITING.

    Meyer writes at an amateur level- constantly abusing a thesaurus with shameless purple prose. She takes simple, elementary sentences and stuffs them with an overabundance of modifiers. Example:

    \”His skin, white despite the faint flush from yesterday\’s hunting trip, literally sparkled, like thousands of tiny diamonds were embedded in the surface. He lay perfectly still in the grass, his shirt open over his sculpted, incandescent chest, his scintillating arms bare. His glistening, pale lavender lids were shut, though of course he didn\’t sleep. A perfect statue, carved in some unknown stone, smooth like marble, glittering like crystal.\”

    There are 69 words in that short excerpt; 18 of which are adjectives/adverbs; 5 of which are synonyms for the same word: sparkling. But that\’s nothing: the word \”murmur\” is used 46 times in the first book alone. Nice way to use imagination instead of repetitiveness, right? Meyer\’s constant massacre of words is a fast way to fill up pages, but leaves absolutely no room for plot, character development, or any kind of quality.
    Acclaimed author Stephen King recently gave his opinion on Meyer, comparing her to Harry Potter author J. K. Rowling. According to King, \”Both Rowling and Meyer, they\’re speaking directly to young people… The real difference is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephenie Meyer can\’t write worth a darn. She\’s not very good.\”
    This is not an exaggeration. Meyer, who has had no previous experience in writing, is exactly that: inexperienced. Although the Twilight \”saga\” isn\’t written terribly, it is written very simply, with amateur writing style, forced vocabulary, and an over-all lack of deepness and literary quality.

    In the words of an English teacher who agreed to read the first book, \”The books are drivel. There\’s no substance.\” While there\’s nothing wrong with empty, simple writing, it should be recognized for what it is: empty and simple, and not, in any way, \”the best book ever written\”, or even \”a well written book\”.

    RELATIONSHIPS.

    Edward and Bella have a disturbingly abusive relationship, which Meyer condones and even celebrates as an ultimate form of romance. However there\’s nothing \”romantic\” about stalking and abuse. An abusive relationship is characterized by jealousy, sexual coercion, verbal abuse, control games, and power plays. Twilight proudly displays all of these. Examples:

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward is jealous of Jacob, to the tune of actively preventing Bella from having even a friendship with him (which he does by stealing the engine out of her car to prevent her from leaving. He admits after the engine episode that the main reason for not wanting Bella to see Jacob was in fact his jealousy). Abuse red flag number one.

    ♦ ♦ ♦-He bribes his sister to put Bella under house arrest while he is gone, so as to keep her under a watchful eye.

    ♦♦ ♦- Edward manipulates Bella into marriage by refusing her wish for intimacy and telling her he will not allow them to have a physical relationship unless she marries him (even though Bella has expressed a strong distaste for marriage at her age, arguing that they are too young).

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward is in complete control of their physical intimacy, while Bella has virtually no say. He controls when and how long Bella is allowed to kiss him, and systematically rejects Bella’s affection when she tries to act on her own. The fact that later he withholds sex, something which Bella wishes for, “for her own protection” is not only a clear example of sexual coercion, but also an insult to Bella. Is she not mature and intelligent enough to know what she wants?

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward isolates Bella from her friends, and encourages her to leave them, calling them \”shallow\”, then abandons her. At that time, he tells her \”you aren\’t good enough\”, in blatant disregard for how this is going to hurt her. In abandoning her, he forbids her best friend- Alice- from seeing her.

    ♦ ♦ ♦\”I couldn\’t live without you.\” Edward attempts suicide over Bella, telling her beforehand that he\’s planning on doing so. Control tactic.

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward encourages Bella to lie to her father about seeing him, and furthermore sneaks around Charlie\’s back in order to see Bella after curfew and before Charlie knew about the relationship.

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward frightens Bella unnecessarily with his vampirism but does not take steps to ensure her safety. He constantly reminds her that if he wanted to, he could crush her, and she wouldn\’t have a chance.

    ♦ ♦ ♦-Edward does not allow Bella to make her own decisions or to disagree with him. In the beginning of New Moon, Edward hides, takes, or destroys all her possessions that are associated with him, without her permission or even her knowledge. He takes Bella\’s belongings that are associated with him in an effort to control her healing process. But Bella is in charge of how she deals with the loss. Edward had no right to act for her.

    ♦-Edward watches Bella while she sleeps (during entire nights, weeks at a time). Even before Bella is aware that he is doing so. Without so much as acquiring permission, he sneaks into her house through her bedroom window to spy on her. A violation of privacy.

    Lucy Mangan wrote an article for The Guardian entitled \’Dangerous Liaisons\” that explained this further:

    \”It sounds melodramatic and shrill to say that Bella and Edward\’s relationship is abusive, but as the story wears on it becomes increasingly hard to avoid the comparison, as she gradually isolates herself from her friends to protect his secret, and learns to subordinate her every impulse and movement to the necessity of not upsetting Edward and his instincts (\”I could quite easily kill you, Bella, by accident\”), until by halfway through she is trying to suppress her very pulse (\”my blood was racing and I wished I could slow it, sensing that this must make everything so much more difficult\”) and planning her movements like a chess game – \”I worried that it would provoke the strange anger that flared whenever I slipped and revealed too clearly how obsessed I was.\” Whenever she responds physically to his kisses, he immediately draws away and berates her. Supporters will call this the erotics of abstinence. I call it fear and distaste for female sexuality and a poisonous message to be feeding young women.
    Edward, of course, has warned her not to be alone with him. He warns her constantly (in between praising her for the quietness with which she absorbs the latest revelation about his true vampiric nature) that she rouses him to such a pitch that he can barely contain himself. To Meyer and her legions of fans, this is evidence of his virtuous, gentlemanly nature. To those less enamoured of Meyerworld, the implication is that Bella chooses to put herself in danger and the further implication is that she must therefore bear full responsibility for the consequences (which, in the way of vampire romances, are not entirely confined to hugs and puppies). When she once confesses that she did find one of his outbursts of temper terrifying, he responds \”You need a healthy dose of fear. Nothing could be more beneficial for you.\” To some, this counts as further proof that he wants to protect Bella from herself. To others, it all smacks uncomfortably of the \”asking for it\” defence. To the older and/or more savvy reader, Edward is less an ideal boyfriend than a proto-rapist.

    Edward is no hero. Bella is no Buffy. And Twilight\’s underlying message – that self-sacrifice makes you a worthy girlfriend, that men mustn\’t be excited beyond a certain point, that men with problems must be forgiven everything, that female passivity is a state to be encouraged – are no good to anyone. It should be staked through its black, black heart.\”

    COMMON ARGUMENTS.

    -Edward didn\’t mean to hurt her.
    But he did hurt her. We can\’t rationalize abuse, even if it is not consciously intentional.

    -Edward is jealous of Jacob because he\’s a dangerous werewolf- remember Emily.
    And remember that unnamed \”singer\” girl that Emmet killed? Jacob is dangerous. Edward is also, if not more, dangerous. Double standards.

    -Edward doesn\’t encourage her to lie to Charlie- he asks her to tell Charlie that they\’re seeing each other.
    He asks her to tell Charlie so he\’ll have \”some small incentive\” not to kill her- that is, so he\’ll get in trouble if her hurts her. Since Bella has shown a strong disregard for her own safety, this isn\’t a compelling argument. Further, his actions in sneaking around Charlie\’s back both before and after curfew was instated demonstrate a real disregard for any sense of openness between Bella and her father.

    -Edward scares Bella to make her understand the danger.
    No matter what the reason, it isn\’t right to try and frighten your girlfriend. She knows he\’s dangerous and can decide to take that risk for herself.

    -Edward tries to act in Bella\’s own interests.
    Which he attempts by taking away Bella\’s independence and free will. Also, by acting against her will or, in cases, without her permission or knowledge (which he claims is \”for her own good\”), Edward is directly insulting Bella by insinuating that she isn\’t intelligent enough to make her own decisions, and is too weak-willed to know what she wants. Bella, for all her flaws, is her own person; no one, even her \”lover\”, has the right to tell her what she thinks and what she wants.

    -Edward\’s attempted suicide proves he loves her- it\’s not a control tactic.
    Killing yourself over someone does not prove you love them, it proves that you need mental help. And teaching a preteen that suicide is romantic will not lead anywhere good.

    -Edward committed suicide because he thought Bella was dead. It can\’t have been an attempt to control her.
    But he told her that he was going to commit suicide beforehand- and that makes it a suicide threat, which is a characteristic of abusers. Some of them are unstable enough to go through with it. Plus, even if his suicide is contingent on her death rather than her absence, it\’s still imposing her decisions by making her re-evaluate the daily risks that she\’s willing to take.

    -But it promotes abstinence, and that\’s good, right?
    Wrong. The only reason they stay abstinent is because Edward tells Bella that he would crush her bones with his pelvis if they even tried – once again holding the fact over her that he is stronger than her, and has the ability to hurt her. Which brings up another topic: why is it alright for them to have sex after they\’re married, since even after marriage, Bella will still be human and easily hurt? Edward proclaims more than once that he has no intention of turning Bella into a vampire. Which leaves his excuse for withholding sex as \”for her own protection\” paper thin. (Later, after they marry and have sex, Bella does, in fact, get hurt.)
    The mere fact that it is supposedly Edward\’s job to \”protect Bella\’s virtue\” (even when Bella herself has decided she is ready for a sexual relationship) furthers the stereotype that women are typical, weak-willed, seductive destroyers-of-man\’s-morals, who needs to be kept in line because they can\’t control themselves. If anything, it should be the woman who protects her \”virtue\”, not her boyfriend. Teenage girls, especially, should learn that it is their own job to protect themselves. \”Edward\” may be opposed to pre-marital sex, but it\’s likely that most boyfriends of teenage girls are not. The message that \”your boyfriend knows what\’s best for you and your relationship\” is, in fact, a very dangerous message to be sending.

    -At least it has kids reading.
    This argument is about as useful as giving a starving child a head of lettuce- sure, it\’s \”food\”, but it has no nutritional value. Sure, Twilight is a book, but what good is it if it has no value? The action of reading isn\’t in itself good- it\’s the material being read.

    TRUE LOVE?

    Meyer tells us that Bella and Edward have true love. They are soul mates. Bella’s lifeblood—her very essence—sings to Edward’s soul. However a meaningful relationship is never built between them. After knowing him from afar for only a few days, Bella decides she is in \”love\” with Edward. However this \”love\” is never explained beyond Bella\’s fascination with Edward\’s good looks. Let\’s break it down into how many times these attributes are described in the first book alone:

    ♦Face: 24
    ♦Voice: 20
    ♦Eyes: 17
    ♦Movement: 11
    ♦Smile: 10
    ♦Teeth: 8
    ♦Muscles: 7
    ♦Skin: 7 (Note: This only contains accounts of Edward\’s skin being beautiful. I didn\’t count references to it as \”pale,\” \”cold,\” or \”white.\” If I had, this number would be about ten times larger.)
    ♦Iron Strength or Limbs: 5
    ♦Breath: 4
    ♦Scent: 4
    ♦Laughter: 3
    ♦Chest: 2
    All of these are mentioned (numerously), but his personality is never listed as a reason for her love. Bella does not, in fact, ever make note of his personality. Her only describing words of him are as follows, along with the number of times each word appears.
    ♦Hard- 109
    ♦Angel- 84
    ♦Cold- 65
    ♦Perfect – 59
    ♦White- 52
    ♦Soft- 48
    ♦Beautiful- 36
    ♦Cool- 33
    ♦Pale- 30
    ♦Stone- 29
    ♦Marble- 9
    ♦Dazzling- 8
    ♦Wry- 6
    ♦Statue- 7
    ♦Flawless- 6
    ♦Godlike- 6
    ♦Adonis- 2
    Sounds like a pretty deep relationship, doesn\’t it?

    The only conversations Bella and Edward hold together are discussions of how dangerous he is, how easily he could hurt her, and how temping her smell is. They know nothing of each other outside of the realm of physical attributes, and discuss nothing more than Edward\’s power.
    When Bella decides she is in love with Edward, she still has no idea who he is, what he\’s like, or what his personality is (too bad the reader never finds out either). Yet somehow she starts to revolve her entire life around him in an unhealthy fit of obsession (abandoning her friends to spend time with him, lying to her father to sneak out with him, controlling her breathing and pulse so as not to \”tempt\” him). The short amount of time in which Bella claims to \”fall in love\” with a person she knows next to nothing about creates the disillusion that \”true love\” is obtained effortlessly in a matter of days; further demeaning the very concept of \”love\”.

    When Edward leaves Bella in the second book, her life falls apart and she begins purposely putting herself in dangerous and potentially life-threatening situations in order to bring him back, or at the very least, bring his voice back (when she puts herself in danger she can mentally hear Edward\’s voice scolding her; something Meyer tries to convey as normal and even a useful way to cope with emotional pain). Eventually Edward returns after Bella throws herself off a cliff, bringing them back together again. After this happens, Meyer makes no effort to discourage this behavior as something unreasonable, but as something that will be effective. What does this teach young girls? That their lives depend on their boyfriends? That nothing else in their lives should matter as much as their relationship? That they should compromise their own safety to draw the attention of a lover? Some young, impressionable teenage girls that read these books have started to believe that this is the \”perfect\” relationship. This should not only concern parents, but disturb them.

    So why do we care so much anyway?

    Because it\’s indicative of a pattern in society to idealize unhealthy and abusive relationships. This book teaches our generation that abusive relationships are okay– no, ROMANTIC, even. Not only is this book a moral threat to our youth, but an assault on literature itself. It\’s unoriginal, amateur, openly abusive, and dare I say it, sexist.

  1226. Edith
    Posted December 3, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    Claudiarocks11

    How long did that take you to write that! hahah

    you sound like a bitter and twisted old trout.

    Go and have fun and enjoy yourself – you sound like you need it!

  1227. o.0
    Posted December 3, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    that’s all bullcrap! i bet you’ve read the book. if you don’t like it, then don’t freaking read it. i’m not a fan of twilight and not against it as well.

    learn to appreciate someone’s work, imagine yourself being them do you think you could handle all those bullcrap stuffs those people give you?

    if you hate it, don’t read it, don’t watch the movie. period. simple as that. you people just wanna make a scene. i know some people who hates it but won’t give a damn sharing it to everyone.

    live a life. besides, its a book for those people who want to read them. if they want to be obsessive that’s their problem. it annoys me as much as you but why would i give a damn? your making yourself as awful as those twilight addicts. your wasting your time…

  1228. read the book
    Posted December 4, 2009 at 12:22 am

    You obviously didn’t read the book.
    If you read the book, you would see that Bella is not a Mary Sue. She does not try to kill herself. Edward has his flaws
    Whether Twilight is better than Harry Potter is a matter of opinion. Don’t make it a fact.
    The book shouldn’t contain real sex if its written for young teenagers.
    Anne Rice’s vampires are not as traditional as you think. A REAL vampire does not burst into flames when they are in the sun.
    Who cares if the world ‘fang’ isn’t used.
    You haven’t read the book, so you can’t even laugh at the stupidity of it.
    Is your name original?
    Meyer can portray her vampires anyway that she wants. Its her book, not yours.
    The book is not so terrible. It’s tolerant enough to read.
    Who cares what Stephen King thinks?
    Meyer wrote four books that she wanted. You didn’t read it, so you wouldn’t know what happens.
    We knew it was a vampire book from the beginning. It was the point.
    Most teenagers fall in love too easily.
    She’s been in Forks longer than that. Don’t go by just want the movie says.
    You actually took the time to look for quotes by nobodies?
    He does? Where did you see this in the book? Tell me a page number where he hits on school faculty.
    Uh….They aren’t werewolves. Did you miss that part, too?
    That’s a little harsh to say. Every book is worth paper. Just because you don’t like it, or haven’t read it for that matter, doesn’t mean its not worth it.
    She wanted to go to college. She has goals and a future.
    I like the book, but I don’t worship it.
    He may be way older than her, but he’s still 17 in looks. If you love someone, and truly love them, you don’t care about age.
    She didn’t leave him. He left her.
    If you read the story, then you would know why Jacob would want their daughter. Its not a choice.
    Good for you, you made up a couple name. Way to go.
    But Chuck Norris isn’t as strong. Edward would rip him apart in seconds.
    Every girl thinks her boyfriend is perfect, even if he’s not.
    You haven’t read the book, so don’t act like you did.
    You seem don’t seem much older than 12.
    Haters only make it more of a hype.
    While you are allowed to have your own opinion, please make valid reasons. You seem to repeat a few of them.
    Some people don’t think its dumb or annoying.
    And besides, how would you know the thoughts of a fictional character, that being Light Yagami? That’s a stupid reason.
    How would you know the thoughts of a dead man?
    Really? I didn’t find it offensive.
    Yeah…95 reasons, which some are repeated and pretty stupid.

  1229. Ryan
    Posted December 4, 2009 at 3:08 am

    First of all let me start off by saying how grateful I am for finding this website and this list. For the longest time I thought I was the only one who hated twilight (not worth capitalizing) with the white hot intensity of a thousand suns. I completely agree with all of your reasons and have a few of my own. However the ones I can not agree more on are numbers 6, 8, 14, 16, 17, 19, 22, and especially 26!

    For the comment above me, this list is not backed up by citations and is in its entirety an opinion based form which you do not have to agree. Stephen King is one of the most renowned authors ever to grace this world and has more literature behind his name than Meyers will ever hope to achieve. Period!

    Furthermore, #88, has been proven numerous times, within the comments because “fans” have been attacking the opinions that differ from their own.

    P.S. Chuck Norris is a real person. Edward will never exist. Its pretty clear who would win in a fight.

  1230. T
    Posted December 5, 2009 at 12:13 am

    Hey, whoever is on Facebook, I just created a group called
    Team Shut the F*** up About Twilight
    join!

  1231. Kate
    Posted December 5, 2009 at 9:52 pm

    I am completely ashamed to admit I have read all 4 books and seen the first movie. Once upon a time I loved them. Now I have come to my senses. I wasted quite a few hours on those stupid books. I love number 66 btw!
    To be pefectly honest you don’t need 95 reasons. You could explain it all with a few about Edward. 1: He is a sparkly vampire (shame on every vampire ever created in book/movies or otherwise) 2: He stalks Bella and watches her sleep 3: He gives girls such unrealistic expectations of love I imagine this generations child birth statistics will be so low China will abandon the 1 child per family rule while other girls over the world refuse to have children until Edward sleeps with them. It’s just bizzare when through the entire series even when she is turned into a vampire her feeling for Edward still focus quite largely on what’s between her legs. The guys practically a mute! Personality doesn’t particurly matter I guess, as long as a guy sparkles and is pasty white. 4: It fails. Easy as that. I mean to compare it to Harry Potter? It almost makes me want to cry! Twilight was a wet paper novel with a pathetic love story of 2 characters who fell in “love” in a 3 weeks while HP was a rock solid novel whose series got better or remained as decent as the first book as time went on AND it covered love, actions and all that. OH and number 5: If your in love then it’s ok to butcher your wife-bruise, stab with needles and grasp her wrist/shoulder/whatever to the point it causes her pain. It is also ok to push her into a pile of glass dishes.
    I also have to agree with the point of her having interesting characters but failing to go any deeper into them. Alice and Jasper could have been. They weren’t because she can’t write.
    The volturi were not as terribly threating as she amped them up to be. You get there to destroy a child and you end up mediating about it?! Vampires are supposed to be dangerous damnit! Wait. So what actually happens in this book? A warped love story about a girl who deserts who family to live forever with a good looking guy? Wow. That doesn’t sound superficial at all!
    And it’s racist! The native american can’t afford clothing or a big enough house or food but the Cullens live in a giant mansion with precious artwork while the warewolves run barefoot through the forrest. All the black vampires are wild while the white ones are as educated as possible. And the entire story revolves around a skinny white girl who is plain but really beautiful. (WTF?! Yes I am confused about Bella’s appearence to!)
    It also sends the message to young girls that if your boyfriend(depsite the fact he aint the perfect Edward so not really worth it) leaves you, you can’t go one. All women have been working for, for the last few generations should be thrown away because at the end of the day it is impossible for us to survive without our boyfriend of a few months. Thats it girls! Throw yourself of a cliff and get involved in dangerous activites in the hope that you will die hearing your boyfriends voice in your head(if you are hearing voices I reccomend you see a doctor). Girl power! And then when you finally get over your sucidal depression-its ok to lead another guy on, even if you are still in love! It’s also quite ok with guys if you dump the guy who treats you well for the guy who wants to eat you and deserted you for the last couple of months without any explantion. Thats it! Live your life for the abusive boy friend!

    Now the movies.
    Kristen can’t act. She bites her lip far to often and atempting to portray an innocent character. Comes across more like an STD itch at the amount of time she spends doing it. And if she isn’t biting her lip shes putting her finger in or near her mouth. She constantly seems irritated more than anything. Makes sense really. I would be to if I signed on for the film that would destroy everybodies vision of vampires. She speaks like a man. Probably could have pulled Edward off better than Robert could. Example? “Ok ok, I’ve got it!” Leaving the baseball game. Makes me LOL.
    Robert can’t act. I felt like all he wanted to do was rip her voicebox out for speaking like a guy. I thought this was supposed to be some brilliant love story coz he fails at portraying that emotion. Pity really. Sounds alot more entertaining.
    There was again so much more potential for the minor characters who even from their small parts in the movie who had far better acting talents the other 2. Shame they will all be lumped in being in “the film that runined vampires forever”.
    The directors don’t realise what they hvae done before its to late and they have made the movie. So they do the next best thing. And leave so they don’t have to do the next one. Yes you are right to do that. One was much more than enough.

    Apologies for any grammar or spelling errors.

  1232. Phaedre
    Posted December 6, 2009 at 3:09 am

    To… “Read the book:”

    Hi there. I’m going to talk to you about your little rebuttal to Sarah Rebecca’s list. Actually… I’m just going to refute your statements.

    How do you know whether or not Sarah Rebecca read the book? The answer is: You don’t.

    Obviously, you haven’t read the book… I mean, Bella Swan is a “Mary Sue.” Do you even know what that means? It’s completely obvious that she is.

    You’re right. Bella doesn’t try to kill herself. She just jumps off of a cliff for fun. A recreational sport. Got it. But it’s something that was life-threatening, and all to see her stupid, sparkling Edward.

    Yes, Edward does have flaws. Again, you’re right! But even with all of these flaws, Bella still seems him as being utterly perfect.

    Correct. Whether or not someone thinks Harry Potter is better than Twilight is, indeed, an opinion. But so is not liking Twilight.

    The book didn’t contain real sex, but even though it was written for teenagers… Well, first of all, in this day and age, teenagers are having sex. Face it. And secondly, it’s so obvious that Bella wants it throughout the entire series. This is pathetic.

    First of all, vampires aren’t real. The original Dracula did not burst into flames when he went into the sunlight. However, he didn’t sparkle in the sunlight, either.

    Who cares if the word “fang” isn’t used? People that know vampires… Vampires have fangs. But these things in Twilight are not vampires, truly.

    I’m laughing at the stupidity of you.

    I bet your name is pretty original, too, right? The names Stephenie Meyer used are not original. Bella Swan is cliché. Edward is named for the century he lived in… Jacob is so very common.

    Sure, sure. Mrs. Meyer can write anything she wants to, since it’s her book. But that doesn’t mean that it’s safe from criticism.

    The book may have been tolerable for you; that’s your opinion.

    Stephen King is a highly acclaimed author. Many, many people care what he thinks. That doesn’t mean you have to.

    Um… Again, how do you know that Sarah Rebecca hasn’t read the books?

    No… The first two hundred pages relied on the mystery of Edward’s character, but because they slapped, “First, Edward was a vampire,” on the back cover, the whole book seems way drawn out and boring.

    Again, wrong. Most teenagers think with their hormones. It’s called puberty, not love.

    Um… I don’t even recall they said that in the movie… But we’re talking about the books here.

    She was trying to prove a point that some Twilight-Crazy-Fans take their obsession way too far.

    If you like the books so much, why didn’t you look this up yourself so you could prove her wrong more efficiently?

    Um… What the hell? Yes, they are werewolves.

    No, probably not. Not every book is worth the paper it’s printed on. And again with you claiming she hasn’t read the books! You don’t know if she has or not.

    Yeah, she was real set on going to college. Tell me, what were her goals? Become a vampire and get in Edward’s pants. Yeah, that sounds about right. Wait… Where did college play into that?

    If you just like the book, why are you taking the time to defend it?

    Sure, he looks seventeen. But the point still remains that he’s one-hundred-and-nine years old. He’s a stalker!

    You’re right… Yet when Edward thought she’d died, he just had to commit suicide, too.

    What? Imprinting on their demon-child? Sure, it’s not a choice, but it’s still fuckin’ disgusting.

    And it was an awesome couple name.

    But Edward isn’t real… Hell, I could kill Edward. All I’d have to do was – if he were real – kill Bella. But since he’s not, all I have to do is burn the books.

    Not true. I know plenty of girls who think their boyfriends have flaws.

    Again! This is the fourth time you’ve said she hasn’t read the book. Get it into your thick skull! You don’t know if she has or not! And by your reasons, I’m thinking you’re the one that hasn’t read the books.

    You don’t either, seeing as you have to rebuke almost every point she makes, even though this is just her opinion.

    This is very true, but it all started with the Twilight-Crazy-Fans… And now it’s just fun to hate it. Although it makes you ignorant if you haven’t read the books, ’cause then you don’t know what you’re talking about… Kinda like you!

    Opinions don’t have to be based on valid facts. And redundancy is a legitimate literary device.

    Some people do think it’s dumb and annoying. Go figure.

    Pretty sure this was meant as humor… Don’t take it so seriously.

    Again, humor.

    You’re one of many that didn’t find it offensive. And yet there are people that do. Strange, huh?

    Yep, ninety five hilarious reasons.

  1233. Phaedre
    Posted December 6, 2009 at 3:09 am

    To… “Read the book:”

    Hi there. I’m going to talk to you about your little rebuttal to Sarah Rebecca’s list. Actually… I’m just going to refute your statements.

    How do you know whether or not Sarah Rebecca read the book? The answer is: You don’t.

    Obviously, you haven’t read the book… I mean, Bella Swan is a “Mary Sue.” Do you even know what that means? It’s completely obvious that she is.

    You’re right. Bella doesn’t try to kill herself. She just jumps off of a cliff for fun. A recreational sport. Got it. But it’s something that was life-threatening, and all to see her stupid, sparkling Edward.

    Yes, Edward does have flaws. Again, you’re right! But even with all of these flaws, Bella still seems him as being utterly perfect.

    Correct. Whether or not someone thinks Harry Potter is better than Twilight is, indeed, an opinion. But so is not liking Twilight.

    The book didn’t contain real sex, but even though it was written for teenagers… Well, first of all, in this day and age, teenagers are having sex. Face it. And secondly, it’s so obvious that Bella wants it throughout the entire series. This is pathetic.

    First of all, vampires aren’t real. The original Dracula did not burst into flames when he went into the sunlight. However, he didn\’t sparkle in the sunlight, either.

    Who cares if the word “fang” isn’t used? People that know vampires… Vampires have fangs. But these things in Twilight are not vampires, truly.

    I’m laughing at the stupidity of you.

    I bet your name is pretty original, too, right? The names Stephenie Meyer used are not original. Bella Swan is cliché. Edward is named for the century he lived in… Jacob is so very common.

    Sure, sure. Mrs. Meyer can write anything she wants to, since it’s her book. But that doesn’t mean that it’s safe from criticism.

    The book may have been tolerable for you; that’s your opinion.

    Stephen King is a highly acclaimed author. Many, many people care what he thinks. That doesn’t mean you have to.

    Um… Again, how do you know that Sarah Rebecca hasn’t read the books?

    No… The first two hundred pages relied on the mystery of Edward’s character, but because they slapped, “First, Edward was a vampire,” on the back cover, the whole book seems way drawn out and boring.

    Again, wrong. Most teenagers think with their hormones. It’s called puberty, not love.

    Um… I don’t even recall they said that in the movie… But we\’re talking about the books here.

    She was trying to prove a point that some Twilight-Crazy-Fans take their obsession way too far.

    If you like the books so much, why didn’t you look this up yourself so you could prove her wrong more efficiently?

    Um… What the hell? Yes, they are werewolves.

    No, probably not. Not every book is worth the paper it’s printed on. And again with you claiming she hasn’t read the books! You don’t know if she has or not.

    Yeah, she was real set on going to college. Tell me, what were her goals? Become a vampire and get in Edward’s pants. Yeah, that sounds about right. Wait… Where did college play into that?

    If you just like the book, why are you taking the time to defend it?

    Sure, he looks seventeen. But the point still remains that he’s one-hundred-and-nine years old. He’s a stalker!

    You’re right… Yet when Edward thought she’d died, he just had to commit suicide, too.

    What? Imprinting on their demon-child? Sure, it’s not a choice, but it’s still fuckin’ disgusting.

    And it was an awesome couple name.

    But Edward isn’t real… Hell, I could kill Edward. All I’d have to do was – if he were real – kill Bella. But since he’s not, all I have to do is burn the books.

    Not true. I know plenty of girls who think their boyfriends have flaws.

    Again! This is the fourth time you’ve said she hasn’t read the book. Get it into your thick skull! You don’t know if she has or not! And by your reasons, I’m thinking you’re the one that hasn’t read the books.

    You don’t either, seeing as you have to rebuke almost every point she makes, even though this is just her opinion.

    This is very true, but it all started with the Twilight-Crazy-Fans… And now it’s just fun to hate it. Although it makes you ignorant if you haven\’t read the books, \’cause then you don\’t know what you\’re talking about… Kinda like you!

    Opinions don’t have to be based on valid facts. And redundancy is a legitimate literary device.

    Some people do think it’s dumb and annoying. Go figure.

    Pretty sure this was meant as humor… Don’t take it so seriously.

    Again, humor.

    You’re one of many that didn’t find it offensive. And yet there are people that do. Strange, huh?

    Yep, ninety five hilarious reasons.

  1234. Phaedre
    Posted December 6, 2009 at 3:10 am

    To… “Read the book:”

    Hi there. I’m going to talk to you about your little rebuttal to Sarah Rebecca’s list. Actually… I’m just going to refute your statements.

    How do you know whether or not Sarah Rebecca read the book? The answer is: You don’t.

    Obviously, you haven’t read the book… I mean, Bella Swan is a “Mary Sue.” Do you even know what that means? It’s completely obvious that she is.

    You’re right. Bella doesn’t try to kill herself. She just jumps off of a cliff for fun. A recreational sport. Got it. But it’s something that was life-threatening, and all to see her stupid, sparkling Edward.

    Yes, Edward does have flaws. Again, you’re right! But even with all of these flaws, Bella still seems him as being utterly perfect.

    Correct. Whether or not someone thinks Harry Potter is better than Twilight is, indeed, an opinion. But so is not liking Twilight.

    The book didn’t contain real sex, but even though it was written for teenagers… Well, first of all, in this day and age, teenagers are having sex. Face it. And secondly, it’s so obvious that Bella wants it throughout the entire series. This is pathetic.

    First of all, vampires aren’t real. The original Dracula did not burst into flames when he went into the sunlight. However, he didn’t sparkle in the sunlight, either.

    Who cares if the word “fang” isn’t used? People that know vampires… Vampires have fangs. But these things in Twilight are not vampires, truly.

    I’m laughing at the stupidity of you.

    I bet your name is pretty original, too, right? The names Stephenie Meyer used are not original. Bella Swan is cliché. Edward is named for the century he lived in… Jacob is so very common.

    Sure, sure. Mrs. Meyer can write anything she wants to, since it’s her book. But that doesn’t mean that it’s safe from criticism.

    The book may have been tolerable for you; that’s your opinion.

    Stephen King is a highly acclaimed author. Many, many people care what he thinks. That doesn’t mean you have to.

    Um… Again, how do you know that Sarah Rebecca hasn’t read the books?

    No… The first two hundred pages relied on the mystery of Edward’s character, but because they slapped, “First, Edward was a vampire,” on the back cover, the whole book seems way drawn out and boring.

    Again, wrong. Most teenagers think with their hormones. It’s called puberty, not love.

    Um… I don’t even recall they said that in the movie… But we\\\’re talking about the books here.

    She was trying to prove a point that some Twilight-Crazy-Fans take their obsession way too far.

    If you like the books so much, why didn’t you look this up yourself so you could prove her wrong more efficiently?

    Um… What the hell? Yes, they are werewolves.

    No, probably not. Not every book is worth the paper it’s printed on. And again with you claiming she hasn’t read the books! You don’t know if she has or not.

    Yeah, she was real set on going to college. Tell me, what were her goals? Become a vampire and get in Edward’s pants. Yeah, that sounds about right. Wait… Where did college play into that?

    If you just like the book, why are you taking the time to defend it?

    Sure, he looks seventeen. But the point still remains that he’s one-hundred-and-nine years old. He’s a stalker!

    You’re right… Yet when Edward thought she’d died, he just had to commit suicide, too.

    What? Imprinting on their demon-child? Sure, it’s not a choice, but it’s still fuckin’ disgusting.

    And it was an awesome couple name.

    But Edward isn’t real… Hell, I could kill Edward. All I’d have to do was – if he were real – kill Bella. But since he’s not, all I have to do is burn the books.

    Not true. I know plenty of girls who think their boyfriends have flaws.

    Again! This is the fourth time you’ve said she hasn’t read the book. Get it into your thick skull! You don’t know if she has or not! And by your reasons, I’m thinking you’re the one that hasn’t read the books.

    You don’t either, seeing as you have to rebuke almost every point she makes, even though this is just her opinion.

    This is very true, but it all started with the Twilight-Crazy-Fans… And now it’s just fun to hate it. Although it makes you ignorant if you haven’t read the books, ’cause then you don’t know what you’re talking about… Kinda like you!

    Opinions don’t have to be based on valid facts. And redundancy is a legitimate literary device.

    Some people do think it’s dumb and annoying. Go figure.

    Pretty sure this was meant as humor… Don’t take it so seriously.

    Again, humor.

    You’re one of many that didn’t find it offensive. And yet there are people that do. Strange, huh?

    Yep, ninety five hilarious reasons.

  1235. Megan
    Posted December 6, 2009 at 5:09 am

    seriously who would want a story about a pedophile and a necrophiliac!

  1236. Crickets
    Posted December 6, 2009 at 9:29 am

    I could not agree with you anymore. If I agreed with you more we would probably be the same exact person or best friends or something along those line. I was ashamed that Wuthering Heights is one of my favorite novels when they mentioned it in Twilight.

    All I want out of Twilight fans at this point is an intelligently written and grammatically correct counter arguement that can actually prove that there I ANY dimension as depth to this book . Honestly, just using the word love does not make it a wonderful anomaly or profound at all.

  1237. Crickets
    Posted December 6, 2009 at 9:50 am

    Bella and Edward make themselves WAY to vulnerable to be truly in love (unless they’re both emotional inept and stupidly overconfident). Any normal person, Jacob for instance, restrains from telling someone they love them even after they’re sure of it. You show it and imply it sure, but you sure a hell don’t pull an Edward and stalk them. Bella smells good, Edward’s weirdly attractive. This is nothing to be idolized.

  1238. Jane
    Posted December 6, 2009 at 11:11 pm

    You need to calm down about the whole “why i hate Twilight thing”. Different people have different opinions. The book is fiction. If you didn’t care so much about you wouldn’t have taken the time to make this list or read the series or finished the first book. A lot of the things you said on this website can be proven wrong. You dont like it, I do. Trashing people (stepehenie meyer) is going to bite you in the but like carma.

    BTW: All your facts are wrong. She doesn’t try to commit suicide.

  1239. Lily
    Posted December 7, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    Oh, Twilight lovers, please keep existing: your awful comments provide wonderful entertainment!

  1240. Steph
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 1:15 am

    I would like to start with saying that your list kept me laughing, especially point 66. A little comment towards point 40 about Meyer creating excellent characters like Jasper and Alice, then not utilizing them. I disagree with this because if you really delve into the (minimal) character description they have, it’s all the same plot: women wait around for their big strong man and then have a family, and that is all that they want. Case in point:

    Bella waited around for Edward, her “big strong man” to come and save her from stuff, then they have a baby together in the end, thus creating the “perfect” family. Rosalie only saved Emmett from imminent death because he reminded her of the baby her best friend had from her life as a human and she wished to save that reminder, eventually falling in love with her “big strong man” character. She is also jealous of Bella for being able to have a child. Alice says point blank to Bella that when she woke up she saw Jasper’s face and knew that all she had to do was wait for him. Moral of the story: if you wait around long enough, your “big strong man” will come and you won’t have to worry anymore.

    To be fair though, the typical mourning period of a relationship is equivalent to half the time of the relationship (relationship of one year=6 months of missing other person) so Bella being depressed for so long is pretty normal. That doesn’t mean she shouldn’t go out or that she should always sit around and be depressed, but it’s a reasonable explanation for her sadness.

    Midnight Sun (what Meyer released of it) was interesting because it shows Edward as the shallow, callous (not to mention socially awkward) sycophant he is under the surface of that calm, polite demeanor. Yet while he says that Rosalie is shallow, I applaud her character for being true to her nature and not trying to hide behind the facade that she is better than she actually is, as Bella tends to do. Edward, if you take away the looks and vampire fact, is that pale creepy guy who sits in the back of the class and would be labelled a freak even if he weren’t a different species. Because honestly, we have the guys who look like Edward, in the backround of our lives, completely ignored because we get the creep vibe from him. If Edward were not supernaturally beautiful, we would call the cops if we so much as suspected he was standing on the corner of our street.

    I will admit that I enjoyed the Twilight books when I first read them four years ago at the tender age of 14, but even then I took it as a beach read. It was fun to think about that perfect guy who you can mold into whatever you want, but at the end of the day I prefer my nerds :) . I feel that the movies are over-hyped and were it not for the famous cast and star directors (Twilight by Catherine Hardwick(Thirteen), New Moon by Chris Weitz(Golden Compass, About a Boy) and now Eclipse is slated to be directed by David Slade(30 Days of Night, Hard Candy)) it probably would not have become as big as it is.

    And while I do agree the Harry Potter could kick Edward`s ass, I can`t help but picture Alucard blowing a hole through his head with his beloved gun and saying “real vampires don’t sparkle, bitch”.

  1241. JR
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    WOW!!! I value your opinion on the book everyone is entitled to one, but who are you to say that the writing sucks. I hope you’re some kind of editor or writer yourself, because that’s just rude no matter who you are. I say get a life, and stop bashing other people’s writing!!

  1242. JR
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    Also, who says she had to write a book about vampire according to some other person’s description of one? Edward is supposed to be perfect, and bella isn’t perfect by far! What book were you retards reading apparently not this one!! Oh yeah and bella had been in forks longer than a month when she learned edward was watching her sleep for two!!! Really people get your facts strait before yo go bashing a book!!!

  1243. just commenting
    Posted December 9, 2009 at 7:38 am

    wow ..so f***ing true!!!!!
    i cant believe i wated my time reading the books…they are definitely NOT stereotyped…all the 4 books are gay!!!!
    n now looking back at those wonderful hrs lost , i cant remember why the hell did i read them!

  1244. Silaskitty22
    Posted December 11, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    So the person who wrote this post has read all four books? That’s surprising because I just wrote a response to every single reason listed, and all of the reasons that make any sense (I don’t count the T. Pain, Chuck Norris, or Light Yagami comments in this group; funny, but irrelevant) can be refuted with actual lines/plot points from the books. A lot of the reasons listed can also be refuted with others posted in the same list. Here are a few select examples since I don’t have enough room to put in all of my responses.

    #11 says Edward is perfect, but #19 complains that he’s “possessive, border line abusive, and boring.” Well, if that’s your idea of a perfect guy, then I suppose these two aren’t contradictory, but since you have a problem with Edward….

    #14 is claiming that Bella is an anti-feminist. But….

    Have you read ANY of these books? Bella is always complaining to herself that no one wants her do anything. She wants to go meet James in the ballet studio to save her mother’s life, but no one would have let her, so she had to sneak out. She wanted to go save Edward from the Volturi, but Jacob begged her to not go so that she would stay alive. Bella wanted to be in the clearing during the battle with the newborns, but, again, no one would allow her. She even wanted to learn to fight in the fourth book so that she would be an asset instead of a liability, but Edward was constantly agonizing over her being in danger. Now tell me that Bella lets the men do it all.

    #17 claims that Bella is an idol to girls everywhere.

    I have yet to see a golden statue of Bella Swan with teenage girls worshipping it.

    #20 “It’s too cliche.” and #36 About forbidden love being “original”

    I guess that means we can’t enjoy Romeo and Juliet anymore, then, either….

    #21 About no real sex and #39 About a drug reference in a book for young teens.

    So you want twelve-year-olds to read about sex but not drugs?

    #41 About Facebook bumper stickers and #81 About Chuck Norris.

    I’m going to replace “Twilight/Edward” from #41 with Chuck Norris:

    “Every other Facebook bumper sticker is about [Chuck Norris]. EVERY OTHER ONE.”

    So, by your logic, we can’t like Chuck Norris, either? Okay, whatever you say….

    Any number where the defense involves something like “dumb” or “stupid,” etc. You’re grasping at straws.

    #92 About Martin Luther disapproving.

    If…
    A) You are Martin Luther, or
    B) He has visited you in a dream and told you that he does not approve of Twilight,
    Then you can tell me that he would not approve. Still, his opinion probably wouldn’t change mine. I definitely don’t feel like God disapproves, and His opinion is the only one that could sway me from my own opinion.

    If you are going to make a list like this, at least present some evidence to back you up. The only quoted things were the fan girl quotes, and not ALL Twilight fans talk like that. I don’t think any of them really believe that vampires/the Cullens exist. It’s more likely the “show off when we’re in a group” complex. It doesn’t excuse their lack of real evidence or their rudeness, but at least it’s an explanation.

  1245. Silaskitty22
    Posted December 11, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    Okay, I just noticed a lot of people talking about how what Bella and Edward have can’t be love, so I’m going to add something else.

    (On page 204 of the paperback edition of Twilight)

    Jessica says:
    “….He must like you.”
    “I think so, but it’s hard to tell. He’s always so cryptic,” I threw in for his benefit, sighing.
    “I don’t know how you’re brave enough to be alone with him,” she breathed.
    “Why?” I was shocked, but she didn’t understand my reaction.
    “He’s so…intimidating. I wouldn’t know what to say to him.” She made a face, probably remembering this morning or last night, when he’d turned the overwhelming force of his eyes on her.
    “I do have some trouble with incoherency when I’m around him,” I admitted.
    “Oh well. He is unbelievably gorgeous.” Jessica shrugged as if this excused any flaws. Which, in her book, it probably did.
    “There’s a lot more to him than that.”
    “Really? Like what?”
    I wished I had let it go. Almost as much as I was hoping he’d been kidding about listening in.
    “I can’t explain it right. But he’s even more unbelievable behind the face.” The vampire who wanted to be good—who ran around saving people’s lives so he wouldn’t be a monster….

    Also, in the third book, Jacob asks Bella why she’s in love with Edward. She explains that she loves him for who he is. She loves him because he’s “‘the most loving and unselfish and brilliant and decent person [she’s] ever met.’” (Page 110 of hardcover edition of Eclipse)

    Bella may think more about how gorgeous Edward is, but she knows that he’s intelligent, a gentleman, selfless, kind, and all of the other qualities she loves about him. Stephenie Meyer does a great job at “showing, not telling” (#24). It’s not her fault if you can’t pick up on the characteristics of both her major and her minor characters because she doesn’t specifically tell them. Missing their traits is probably what led you to think that Meyer’s always “telling.” I suggest reading the books again and looking more closely.

    While I was looking for the number of the showing comment, I found a couple other points I want to bring up.

    29. It’s predictable.

    Name one romance film or book that’s not predictable.

    31. Meyer can’t think of original names except Rennesme.

    Firstly, it’s “Renesmee.”

    Secondly, why does it make a difference whether the name is a combination of two other names? It is original because no one else in the world is named Renesmee. Where the idea for the name came from has nothing to do with the name’s originality.

    Last (but not least), what difference does it make that she did not make up all of her character’s names? You love Harry Potter; well, “Harry” and “Potter” are fairly common names. So are “Ron,” “Fred,” “George,” “Arthur,” “Molly,” “Bill,” “Charlie,” “Gregory,” “Lily,” and “James.” The name holds much less significance than the character it represents.

    32. Vampires can’t get people pregnant.

    Well, since vampires are part of fantasy novels, and the Oxford English Dictionary defines “fantasy” as both a genre of literature and “a supposition resting on NO SOLID GROUNDS,” (emphasis added), she can write whatever she wants about vampires. There is no accepted doctrine, so there is no rule for her to go against. Ergo, vampires in Twilight can impregnate human women if she wants them to.

    Also, Stephenie Meyer actually has an explanation of the science behind a male vampire’s ability to impregnate a human woman on her website. On the Breaking Dawn FAQ page, look for the question: “Vampires and Pregnancy: When did that idea occur to you? How does that work?”

    Here’s a direct link: http://stepheniemeyer.com/bd_faq.html

    #38. It’s too easy to mock. Go on Youtube, how many mocks on Twilight can you see?

    If that’s a defense, then I guess nobody can like Harry Potter, Lady Gaga, Taylor Swift, Chronicles of Narnia, Lord of the Rings, Michael Jackson, or…pretty much anything. You can find tons of mocks for almost anything on Youtube.

    48. Straight men sparkle?

    Do gay men sparkle? Some of their clothes might, but they themselves don’t.

    50. Bella Swan means beautiful swan, which is horribly cheesy.

    Her name is actually Isabella, technically, and I believe that her last name was chosen first. Meyer said she had a lot of trouble finding a name that fit the main character perfectly, and I’m pretty sure that Bella was her last unnamed character (which would mean she had already named Chief Swan). And what’s wrong with a little cheese now and then?

    Also, Meyer was going to name her first daughter Isabella, but she ended up only having boys. The name was only used because it was there, it was available, and it felt right.

  1246. Silaskitty22
    Posted December 11, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    Okay, I just noticed a lot of people talking about how what Bella and Edward have can\’t be love, so I\’m going to add something else.

    (On page 204 of the paperback edition of Twilight)

    Jessica says:
    “….He must like you.”
    “I think so, but it’s hard to tell. He’s always so cryptic,” I threw in for his benefit, sighing.
    “I don’t know how you’re brave enough to be alone with him,” she breathed.
    “Why?” I was shocked, but she didn’t understand my reaction.
    “He’s so…intimidating. I wouldn’t know what to say to him.” She made a face, probably remembering this morning or last night, when he’d turned the overwhelming force of his eyes on her.
    “I do have some trouble with incoherency when I’m around him,” I admitted.
    “Oh well. He is unbelievably gorgeous.” Jessica shrugged as if this excused any flaws. Which, in her book, it probably did.
    “There’s a lot more to him than that.”
    “Really? Like what?”
    I wished I had let it go. Almost as much as I was hoping he’d been kidding about listening in.
    “I can’t explain it right. But he’s even more unbelievable behind the face.” The vampire who wanted to be good—who ran around saving people’s lives so he wouldn’t be a monster….

    Also, in the third book, Jacob asks Bella why she’s in love with Edward. She explains that she loves him for who he is. She loves him because he’s “‘the most loving and unselfish and brilliant and decent person [she’s] ever met.’” (Page 110 of hardcover edition of Eclipse)

    Bella may think more about how gorgeous Edward is, but she knows that he\’s intelligent, a gentleman, selfless, kind, and all of the other qualities she loves about him. Stephenie Meyer does a great job at \”showing, not telling\” (#24). It\’s not her fault if you can\’t pick up on the characteristics of both her major and her minor characters because she doesn\’t specifically tell them. Missing their traits is probably what led you to think that Meyer\’s always \”telling.\” I suggest reading the books again and looking more closely.

    While I was looking for the number of the showing comment, I found a couple other points I want to bring up.

    29. It’s predictable.

    Name one romance film or book that’s not predictable.

    31. Meyer can\’t think of original names except Rennesme.

    Firstly, it’s “Renesmee.”

    Secondly, why does it make a difference whether the name is a combination of two other names? It is original because no one else in the world is named Renesmee. Where the idea for the name came from has nothing to do with the name’s originality.

    Last (but not least), what difference does it make that she did not make up all of her character’s names? You love Harry Potter; well, “Harry” and “Potter” are fairly common names. So are “Ron,” “Fred,” “George,” “Arthur,” “Molly,” “Bill,” “Charlie,” “Gregory,” “Lily,” and “James.” The name holds much less significance than the character it represents.

    32. Vampires can’t get people pregnant.

    Well, since vampires are part of fantasy novels, and the Oxford English Dictionary defines \”fantasy\” as both a genre of literature and \”a supposition resting on NO SOLID GROUNDS,\” (emphasis added), she can write whatever she wants about vampires. There is no accepted doctrine, so there is no rule for her to go against. Ergo, vampires in Twilight can impregnate human women if she wants them to.

    Also, Stephenie Meyer actually has an explanation of the science behind a male vampire’s ability to impregnate a human woman on her website. On the Breaking Dawn FAQ page, look for the question: “Vampires and Pregnancy: When did that idea occur to you? How does that work?”

    Here’s a direct link: http://stepheniemeyer.com/bd_faq.html

    #38. It’s too easy to mock. Go on Youtube, how many mocks on Twilight can you see?

    If that’s a defense, then I guess nobody can like Harry Potter, Lady Gaga, Taylor Swift, Chronicles of Narnia, Lord of the Rings, Michael Jackson, or…pretty much anything. You can find tons of mocks for almost anything on Youtube.

    48. Straight men sparkle?

    Do gay men sparkle? Some of their clothes might, but they themselves don’t.

    50. Bella Swan means beautiful swan, which is horribly cheesy.

    Her name is actually Isabella, technically, and I believe that her last name was chosen first. Meyer said she had a lot of trouble finding a name that fit the main character perfectly, and I’m pretty sure that Bella was her last unnamed character (which would mean she had already named Chief Swan). And what’s wrong with a little cheese now and then?

    Also, Meyer was going to name her first daughter Isabella, but she ended up only having boys. The name was only used because it was there, it was available, and it felt right.

  1247. Silaskitty22
    Posted December 11, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    Okay, I just noticed a lot of people talking about how what Bella and Edward have can\\\’t be love, so I\\\’m going to add something else.

    (On page 204 of the paperback edition of Twilight)

    Jessica says:
    “….He must like you.”
    “I think so, but it’s hard to tell. He’s always so cryptic,” I threw in for his benefit, sighing.
    “I don’t know how you’re brave enough to be alone with him,” she breathed.
    “Why?” I was shocked, but she didn’t understand my reaction.
    “He’s so…intimidating. I wouldn’t know what to say to him.” She made a face, probably remembering this morning or last night, when he’d turned the overwhelming force of his eyes on her.
    “I do have some trouble with incoherency when I’m around him,” I admitted.
    “Oh well. He is unbelievably gorgeous.” Jessica shrugged as if this excused any flaws. Which, in her book, it probably did.
    “There’s a lot more to him than that.”
    “Really? Like what?”
    I wished I had let it go. Almost as much as I was hoping he’d been kidding about listening in.
    “I can’t explain it right. But he’s even more unbelievable behind the face.” The vampire who wanted to be good—who ran around saving people’s lives so he wouldn’t be a monster….

    Also, in the third book, Jacob asks Bella why she’s in love with Edward. She explains that she loves him for who he is. She loves him because he’s “‘the most loving and unselfish and brilliant and decent person [she’s] ever met.’” (Page 110 of hardcover edition of Eclipse)

    Bella may think more about how gorgeous Edward is, but she knows that he\\\’s intelligent, a gentleman, selfless, kind, and all of the other qualities she loves about him. Stephenie Meyer does a great job at \\\”showing, not telling\\\” (#24). It\\\’s not her fault if you can\\\’t pick up on the characteristics of both her major and her minor characters because she doesn\\\’t specifically tell them. Missing their traits is probably what led you to think that Meyer\\\’s always \\\”telling.\\\” I suggest reading the books again and looking more closely.

    While I was looking for the number of the showing comment, I found a couple other points I want to bring up.

    29. It’s predictable.

    Name one romance film or book that’s not predictable.

    31. Meyer can\\\’t think of original names except Rennesme.

    Firstly, it’s “Renesmee.”

    Secondly, why does it make a difference whether the name is a combination of two other names? It is original because no one else in the world is named Renesmee. Where the idea for the name came from has nothing to do with the name’s originality.

    Last (but not least), what difference does it make that she did not make up all of her character’s names? You love Harry Potter; well, “Harry” and “Potter” are fairly common names. So are “Ron,” “Fred,” “George,” “Arthur,” “Molly,” “Bill,” “Charlie,” “Gregory,” “Lily,” and “James.” The name holds much less significance than the character it represents.

    32. Vampires can’t get people pregnant.

    Well, since vampires are part of fantasy novels, and the Oxford English Dictionary defines \\\”fantasy\\\” as both a genre of literature and \\\”a supposition resting on NO SOLID GROUNDS,\\\” (emphasis added), she can write whatever she wants about vampires. There is no accepted doctrine, so there is no rule for her to go against. Ergo, vampires in Twilight can impregnate human women if she wants them to.

    Also, Stephenie Meyer actually has an explanation of the science behind a male vampire’s ability to impregnate a human woman on her website. On the Breaking Dawn FAQ page, look for the question: “Vampires and Pregnancy: When did that idea occur to you? How does that work?”

    Here’s a direct link: http://stepheniemeyer.com/bd_faq.html

    #38. It’s too easy to mock. Go on Youtube, how many mocks on Twilight can you see?

    If that’s a defense, then I guess nobody can like Harry Potter, Lady Gaga, Taylor Swift, Chronicles of Narnia, Lord of the Rings, Michael Jackson, or…pretty much anything. You can find tons of mocks for almost anything on Youtube.

    48. Straight men sparkle?

    Do gay men sparkle? Some of their clothes might, but they themselves don’t.

    50. Bella Swan means beautiful swan, which is horribly cheesy.

    Her name is actually Isabella, technically, and I believe that her last name was chosen first. Meyer said she had a lot of trouble finding a name that fit the main character perfectly, and I’m pretty sure that Bella was her last unnamed character (which would mean she had already named Chief Swan). And what’s wrong with a little cheese now and then?

    Also, Meyer was going to name her first daughter Isabella, but she ended up only having boys. The name was only used because it was there, it was available, and it felt right.

  1248. Silaskitty22
    Posted December 11, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    Sorry about the multiple posts. Technology trouble

  1249. Nadège
    Posted December 12, 2009 at 9:22 am

    I SO agree with you!
    I actually used to like the books, but then I read them again, and even I ,who isn’t english-speaking, saw they are not well-written, that the story makes random jumps to be able to actually have a story, and that the characters are really just flat characters. And then those fangirls came … Now, it’s the one thing I hate.

  1250. Hawra
    Posted December 12, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    finally someone who agrees with me that twilight SUCKs!
    i still cant get how the writer managed to write 4 novels with Bella and Edward’s relationship as the centric topic while the story can be summed up in one book
    I still cant figure out how they fell in love in the first place !!

  1251. taylor
    Posted December 13, 2009 at 11:35 am

    i absolutley HATE twlight
    ALL of my friends read it and they have twilight shirts and twlight backspacks and pictures of the little bastards on their binders OH AND they call eachother bella and alice and watever else names are in the books i can barely hang out with them their REALLY annoying and if i say something there like you no what edward is so hot and ur jelous or maybe u shud read the book im like uhh NO!
    twlight sucks
    : )

  1252. DrarryForTheWin
    Posted December 13, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    I immensely enjoyed your list. I feel all your reasons are valid and/or humorous having read all the books and seen both movies. I agree completely that Harry Potter is way better than Twilight. Most people who read Twilight’s favorite character is Edward. If you ask Harry Potter fans not everyone’s favorite character is Harry Potter. For example mine is Draco Malfoy and my best friend’s is Luna Lovegood. Also, most Twilight fan’s reasons for liking Twilight is because they saw the movie and they think all the characters are hot. All of us have different renditions of the characters in books. A lot of Twilight fans think no one in Harry Potter is hot because of the movies. Well I imagine some of them are. A lot of us do.
    So any Twilight fans that want to disregard Harry Potter, think it through first please so we don’t have to listen to it.
    P.S. WIZARDS FOR THE WIN!!!!! Oh and any HP fans (and the writer of this list) out there check this out you might laugh. I did.

  1253. Brooke
    Posted December 13, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    I don’t care if people don’t like Twilight because it isn’t their taste, but I do have an issue with people who won’t read the book because so many others do. You should never make an opinion based on what other people think. If you haven’t read the book, I suggest reading it and finding out for yourself. It’s not a long book; it shouldn’t take you more than a week to get through. If you still don’t like it, at least you can say that you honestly gave it a try.

    I almost didn’t give Harry Potter a try. I’m so glad I let my friends talk me into reading those books! You might end up feeling the same way about the Twilight series.

  1254. DrarryForTheWin
    Posted December 13, 2009 at 11:47 pm

    People who dislike Twilight: I recommend: “Nightlight: A Parody” By: The Harvard Lampoon. It makes fun of Twilight and its a riot.

  1255. Kay
    Posted December 14, 2009 at 12:57 am

    I don’t normally comment on this stuff, but i cannot stand twilight [Bella in particular!] i guess the reason i hate it so much is because my friend dragged me to see Twilight cause it’s “THE MOST AMAZINGESTIEST MOVIE I’VE EVER SEEN” and it was… well apart from the story line just being too… idk. fantasy syfy, i couldn’t get past the fact that every sentence that came out of Bella’s mouth was said like this
    “…….E-E-dward…. I-I Lov-ve you….. with all my h-heart… “could you image spending a regular day with her?!
    “Hey Bell’s wattaya want for lunch? “J-just…. Just a Ch-cheese burger……..”
    and after i saw the movie i wanted to see if it did justice to the book. i read the series… i laughed… a lot. so then i realized that this would be a more realistic version of my and Bella’s lunch together.

    “J-just…. Just a Ch-cheese burger…….” she barely choked out, looking away. she was thinking. i could tell. ‘oh, how i miss Edward. if Edward could eat, he would eat cheeseburgers with me…. I just want to be home making out with Edward…’ *Bella get’s a text from Edward* “O-oh…. he-he-he-he’s leaving me!” She yelled out in pain almost, collapsing to the floor in the fetal position.

    “Not this again.” i said. looking away.. you have no idea how often this happens.

    *Jacob enters majestically*

    “It-it’s okay-y… i think i l-love J-jacob…. maybe he’ll build me another mot-torcycle….. and a sidecar for renesmee….. so she can hear E-e-e-e-e-e-dward….. talk….. too…

    So… i wont be spending time with her any time soon cause… she’s annoying.

  1256. Posted December 14, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    Hey Join my don’t like Twillight group on facebook!!!:D http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-This-Club-If-You-Dont-Like-Or-Hate-The-Twillight-Saga/219923941254

  1257. Chloe
    Posted December 14, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    I like the books and this still made me laugh :)
    It’s true, even though I enjoy them, the plot is so limited it’s unreal

  1258. Brandon
    Posted December 14, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    You want a good romance story? read Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina; that’s full of romance, irony, drama, and written in stream-of-consciousness narrative, not whatever the hell twilight is ‘written’ *cough*sarcasm*cough* in

  1259. Alexandria Anne Cullen♥
    Posted December 15, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    Lolz,oh really? That’s like so true!!! Not!!! Twilight is awesome,and unless you do want a bunch of us Twilight fans hatin’ you then you better stop sayin’ how much you ”hate” the series!!! Kay? And on the whole ” Twilight fans can’t spell,or use capitalization” Is wrong,okay? Some of us can spell,and stuff!! I know you have your own opinions and how this is the internet you can say and do anything you wanna,cause it’s a free country. I understand,but why do yall have to go around saying” it sucks,Bella is the worst girl people should look up to and blah blah?” We get it,you don’t like the series,and you wish it wouldn’t even exsist. But look,you don’t see us goin’ around talkin’ bad bout the things that yall love,and like a whole lot. And do you EVER see us go around like um,i dunno,saying how much we hate a certain thing cause you like it? No. Do you ever see anybody dressed as Harry Potter on Halloween? Not much…. With the whole “Harry Potter is better than, Twilight,” thing.. I’ve only seen clips of each movie,cause my family loves them. Since this is my opinion i think different. It’s horrible and actually quite boring if you think about it… Everyone has their own opinions but you don’t like it when we say we hate a certain thing you like,then think about how it affects us when you say you ”hate” Twilight.. But whatever I can’t make you do anything,just cause this is the internet and watevs doesn’t mean everyone cares about your opinion,now do they? Also,with the thing about how real parents don’t question their kids,about where their goin’,or what their doin’ or whatever. My parents don’t ask much bout that either kays? So yeeah…you’re just gonna have to deal with it cause us Twilight fans are EVERYWHERE!!! So get over yourself,and grow up a lil’ bit.
    (:

  1260. Machelle
    Posted December 15, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    You were the one talking about how u hate grammatical errors. I didn’t find any in the series, but i found like 10 in your rant. The book is well-written, so you don’t need to make fun of Stephenie Meyer and all of her hard work. No one ACTUALLY thinks that Edward exists. If you read a book with an already strong dis-like of it (which you shouldn’t have if you haven’t read it yet) then it’s going to be hard for you to realize that it is a good novel. I also would like to point out #85. If you wrote like that when you were 12, you must be a freaking awesome author. You don’t need to insult everyone who gave the books a chance and yell at us. It’s extremely rude, and every other comment made fun of a person, not the book. I wrote this because I think you should think before you decide to openly insult lots of people. (Also, the book made lots of money, so obviously, someone thought it was okay!) Everyone has different opinions, and I respect yours, but I don’t respect you insulting me.
    P.S.- I would like an answer to this, and I don’t want it to be mean or insulting. Use facts, not personal opinions.

  1261. Guest
    Posted December 16, 2009 at 9:44 am

    I think Sarah Rebecca is just jealous that Twilight was a success and hence produce the 95 reasons. Period.

  1262. Voruc
    Posted December 16, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    Hahahaha I love you Put SPOILER and the end of the phrase xD that was the thing that make me lol’d most

  1263. Damien
    Posted December 17, 2009 at 8:56 am

    I found the list somewhat amusing. The Twilight series i would not go too far as to say it was horrible but i do agree with Bella’s bland personality. Forgive any mistakes as i am only a high school kid 8D

  1264. SammWoo
    Posted December 17, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    While I believe you are an idiot, and that you obviously don’t understand that HARRY POTTER is a gaybe, I will be courteous enough to not tell you how completely wrong and stupid your ideas are. Ohhh…And BTW, Edward would beat Harry, AND who wants to watch Harry and Ginny make out? Oh, and practice what you preach, It’s not nice to make fun of people who can’t spell when you can’t spell.
    Thanks for your stupid IDEAS.
    Samantha Woodcock

  1265. DrarryForTheWin
    Posted December 17, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    To SammWoo:

    1. She’s definantly not an idiot.

    2. Whats wrong with that?

    3. What would Edward do against Harry? Run towards him only to get shot down by a spell?

    4. Who wants to see Edward and Bella make out?

    5. Everyone makes typing mistakes.

    6. Twilight fans use circulatory reasoning.

  1266. kira_uchiha
    Posted December 18, 2009 at 7:59 am

    To SammWoo:

    Harry and Ginny do not even make out… they kiss once and its just a peck really.
    Haha who uses the term ‘gaybe’ anyway?

  1267. kira_uchiha
    Posted December 18, 2009 at 8:18 am

    To Machelle:

    Hey you just said it yourself.
    The book was okay. That’s it though.

    Grammatical Errors:
    - Used often in Twilight are mistakes like using ‘ for the start quote and ” for the end quote and vice versa.

    - Bella says “who called who?” instead of “who called whom?”

    - In Eclipse near the end of the book, and Bella, I believe, says, “Who’s definition of…?” when it was clearly supposed to be “whose”.

    - In New Moon Bella says “You don’t have go anywhere, Alice. Your were here first” you don’t have go is incorrect, as she forgot to put “to” in between “have” and “go”

    - On page 266 of New Moon towards the bottom of the page it says:
    “Is Sam catching?” I mumbled.
    It should be, “Is Sam watching?”

    - Location: New Moon, p. 485, 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence
    Sentence: “Are you alright?” Edward asked under his breath, to low for the human woman to hear.
    Mistake/Correction: The “to” is supposed to be too.

    - Location: New Moon, p. 339, last paragraph, 4th sentence
    Sentence: But I met Sam Uley and his fiancee, Emily. The seemed pretty nice to me.
    Mistake/Correction: The “the” is supposed to be they.

    - Eclipse, when Billy Black is telling the legend of the Quileute Tribe:
    Location: Eclipse, p. 249, 2nd paragraph, 4th sentence
    Mistake/Correction: “Taka Aki entered the wolf’s body with relief and gratitude.” The name is Taha Aki.

    - ‘He actually discovered a covern of true vampires that lived hidden in the sewers of the city.’ Twilight pg 289
    This was when Carlisle was about to get bitten so it must have been around 1660-1670 no?. The mistake here is that at that time there was no way anybody could hide in the sewers of London because there weren’t any. Sewage flowed openly down the middle of the streets untill it came to the river Thames. There were no tunnels. Only about two hundred years later and many outbreaks of Cholera did London get it’s act together and charged Joseph Bazalgette to build a sewage system consisting of many interconnecting tunnels. It was built between 1859 and 1865. Many, many years later

    - In Breaking Dawn it says Charlie is eating pancakes in one paragraph, then it says he’s eating cereal in another.

    FACT!!!!!!!!
    There’s a huge logic error in all the books. In the first book, it says that humans are turned into vampires by vampire bites that injects a venom. In the fourth book, it says that vampires are different from humans because they have a different amount of chromosomes, so there can be “half-vampires” with a number of chromosomes in between that of humans and vampires.

    That’s impossible. Getting poisoned doesn’t change someone’s genetic structure so much it adds new chromosomes. If people become vampires from vampire bites, injecting a toxin and passing the disease along, that’s almost like an STD: a disease that’s passed along through the bloodstream. It does not change the genetic structure.

    And if that’s true, then how does the baby become a half-vampire? If vampirism is a blood-transmitted disease, just like HIV/AIDS is, then a half-vampire baby is like a normal woman having a baby with an HIV-positive man and getting a half-HIV-positive baby. It doesn’t work like that.

    That’s not the kind of error you’re thinking about, I’m sure, but that’s definitely something Meyer and the editors completely missed.

    Its obvious you don’t respect any of our opinions, so cut the bullocks.

  1268. kira_uchiha
    Posted December 18, 2009 at 8:28 am

    To Machelle:

    Hey you just said it yourself.
    The book was okay. That\’s it though.

    Grammatical Errors:
    - Used often in Twilight are mistakes like using \’ for the start quote and ” for the end quote and vice versa.

    - Bella says “who called who?” instead of \”who called whom?\”

    - In Eclipse near the end of the book, and Bella, I believe, says, \”Who\’s definition of…?\” when it was clearly supposed to be \”whose\”.

    - In New Moon Bella says \”You don\’t have go anywhere, Alice. Your were here first\” you don\’t have go is incorrect, as she forgot to put \”to\” in between \”have\” and \”go\”

    - On page 266 of New Moon towards the bottom of the page it says:
    \”Is Sam catching?\” I mumbled.
    It should be, \”Is Sam watching?\”

    - Location: New Moon, p. 485, 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence
    Sentence: \”Are you alright?\” Edward asked under his breath, to low for the human woman to hear.
    Mistake/Correction: The \”to\” is supposed to be too.

    - Location: New Moon, p. 339, last paragraph, 4th sentence
    Sentence: But I met Sam Uley and his fiancee, Emily. The seemed pretty nice to me.
    Mistake/Correction: The \”the\” is supposed to be they.

    - Eclipse, when Billy Black is telling the legend of the Quileute Tribe:
    Location: Eclipse, p. 249, 2nd paragraph, 4th sentence
    Mistake/Correction: \”Taka Aki entered the wolf\’s body with relief and gratitude.\” The name is Taha Aki.

    - \’He actually discovered a covern of true vampires that lived hidden in the sewers of the city.\’ Twilight pg 289
    This was when Carlisle was about to get bitten so it must have been around 1660-1670 no?. The mistake here is that at that time there was no way anybody could hide in the sewers of London because there weren\’t any. Sewage flowed openly down the middle of the streets untill it came to the river Thames. There were no tunnels. Only about two hundred years later and many outbreaks of Cholera did London get it\’s act together and charged Joseph Bazalgette to build a sewage system consisting of many interconnecting tunnels. It was built between 1859 and 1865. Many, many years later

    - In Breaking Dawn it says Charlie is eating pancakes in one paragraph, then it says he\’s eating cereal in another.

    FACT!!!!!!!!
    There\’s a huge logic error in all the books. In the first book, it says that humans are turned into vampires by vampire bites that injects a venom. In the fourth book, it says that vampires are different from humans because they have a different amount of chromosomes, so there can be \”half-vampires\” with a number of chromosomes in between that of humans and vampires.

    That\’s impossible. Getting poisoned doesn\’t change someone\’s genetic structure so much it adds new chromosomes. If people become vampires from vampire bites, injecting a toxin and passing the disease along, that\’s almost like an STD: a disease that\’s passed along through the bloodstream. It does not change the genetic structure.

    And if that\’s true, then how does the baby become a half-vampire? If vampirism is a blood-transmitted disease, just like HIV/AIDS is, then a half-vampire baby is like a normal woman having a baby with an HIV-positive man and getting a half-HIV-positive baby. It doesn\’t work like that.

    That\’s not the kind of error you\’re thinking about, I\’m sure, but that\’s definitely something Meyer and the editors completely missed.

    Its obvious you don\’t respect any of our opinions, so cut the bullocks.

  1269. kira_uchiha
    Posted December 18, 2009 at 8:40 am

    To Machelle:

    Hey you just said it yourself.
    The book was okay. That\\\’s it though.

    Grammatical Errors:
    - Used often in Twilight are mistakes like using \\\’ for the start quote and \” for the end quote and vice versa.

    - Bella says \”who called who?\” instead of \\\”who called whom?\\\”

    - In Eclipse near the end of the book, and Bella, I believe, says, \\\”Who\\\’s definition of…?\\\” when it was clearly supposed to be \\\”whose\\\”.

    - In New Moon Bella says \\\”You don\\\’t have go anywhere, Alice. Your were here first\\\” you don\\\’t have go is incorrect, as she forgot to put \\\”to\\\” in between \\\”have\\\” and \\\”go\\\”

    - On page 266 of New Moon towards the bottom of the page it says:
    \\\”Is Sam catching?\\\” I mumbled.
    It should be, \\\”Is Sam watching?\\\”

    - Location: New Moon, p. 485, 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence
    Sentence: \\\”Are you alright?\\\” Edward asked under his breath, to low for the human woman to hear.
    Mistake/Correction: The \\\”to\\\” is supposed to be too.

    - Location: New Moon, p. 339, last paragraph, 4th sentence
    Sentence: But I met Sam Uley and his fiancee, Emily. The seemed pretty nice to me.
    Mistake/Correction: The \\\”the\\\” is supposed to be they.

    - Eclipse, when Billy Black is telling the legend of the Quileute Tribe:
    Location: Eclipse, p. 249, 2nd paragraph, 4th sentence
    Mistake/Correction: \\\”Taka Aki entered the wolf\\\’s body with relief and gratitude.\\\” The name is Taha Aki.

    - \\\’He actually discovered a covern of true vampires that lived hidden in the sewers of the city.\\\’ Twilight pg 289
    This was when Carlisle was about to get bitten so it must have been around 1660-1670 no?. The mistake here is that at that time there was no way anybody could hide in the sewers of London because there weren\\\’t any. Sewage flowed openly down the middle of the streets untill it came to the river Thames. There were no tunnels. Only about two hundred years later and many outbreaks of Cholera did London get it\\\’s act together and charged Joseph Bazalgette to build a sewage system consisting of many interconnecting tunnels. It was built between 1859 and 1865. Many, many years later

    - In Breaking Dawn it says Charlie is eating pancakes in one paragraph, then it says he\\\’s eating cereal in another.

    FACT!!!!!!!!
    There\\\’s a huge logic error in all the books. In the first book, it says that humans are turned into vampires by vampire bites that injects a venom. In the fourth book, it says that vampires are different from humans because they have a different amount of chromosomes, so there can be \\\”half-vampires\\\” with a number of chromosomes in between that of humans and vampires.

    That\\\’s impossible. Getting poisoned doesn\\\’t change someone\\\’s genetic structure so much it adds new chromosomes. If people become vampires from vampire bites, injecting a toxin and passing the disease along, that\\\’s almost like an STD: a disease that\\\’s passed along through the bloodstream. It does not change the genetic structure.

    And if that\\\’s true, then how does the baby become a half-vampire? If vampirism is a blood-transmitted disease, just like HIV/AIDS is, then a half-vampire baby is like a normal woman having a baby with an HIV-positive man and getting a half-HIV-positive baby. It doesn\\\’t work like that.

    That\\\’s not the kind of error you\\\’re thinking about, I\\\’m sure, but that\\\’s definitely something Meyer and the editors completely missed.

    Its obvious you don\\\’t respect any of our opinions, so cut the bullocks.

  1270. Squiggy
    Posted December 19, 2009 at 9:50 am

    If hate thw Twilight series so much, then why did you take the time to read it and make a list about it? It makes no sense!

    :-(

  1271. Richard
    Posted December 19, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    Wow, hardcore haters. I don’t understand why people put sooo much time and work into this. I read all 95 and I already feel like I wasted a good portion of my life, never mind the endless comments people put on here.

    I read the books. I neither hate them, nor like them. I watched the two movies that are out and laughed my ass off at them, it was so fun. I hope the other ones are just as funny. (By funny I mean retarded). But whatever, so much animosity is useless. Get over it.

  1272. Mia
    Posted December 21, 2009 at 2:52 am

    I loved this.
    To the comments that ask why make such a list if we don\’t like this? Because it\’s fun collating reasons of hatred. I\’ve read it, I hated it. Bella sucks. I kept hoping she would die. And, although I hate the writing, I support Jacob/Edward, so YAY for that point. Stephen King was right. Completely so.
    And you fans keep arguing that people who don\’t like it are, and I\’m quoting the comments here, \”angry\” or have \”indignation\” when in all honestly, we just hate it. I have no idea how anybody could like it.

  1273. James
    Posted December 21, 2009 at 8:18 am

    This list is comepltely correct. In a few words the series is one massive, overrated fanfiction. The books are repetative and dull, while the acting in the movies is deplorable. Bella never smiles and Edward jizzes in his pants (refer to the ‘Biology class’ scene in Twilight when Bella walks past a conventiently placed fan-for-dramatic-hairflippage. Look at Edward. He’s jizzing.) whenever things get to steamy, or he just hasn’t had his regular dose of blood suckage. Seriously people, get over it.

  1274. sollen
    Posted December 21, 2009 at 11:42 am

    just wanna say this list rox, i still laugh everytime i read this

    its true that Edward doesnt have a flaw, ive read the books and i cant even think of one- and wanting to drink blood is not a flaw its his nature

    the book really should have ended with New Moon, the more it continues the more obvious it becomes that this story was being made up on a whim

    Edward glitters, in the 21st century nobody would even look at him twice- they would think gay so that skin glitter idea is stupid

  1275. Molly
    Posted December 21, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    I like all of these six page comments from idiot “twihards” saying how much of a lie this is. ha. don’t make me laugh. Do you know why Edward Cullen is so pale? there’s no sun in the closet. (where he lives, to clear it up for the “twihards”)

  1276. WBlackwell
    Posted December 21, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    What has happened to this world!!!!!! Read Catcher in the Rye or Dracula….Those are real books. Twilight is aimed at immature women and teenage girls who live in lala land. Get your head out of the clouds and into books that can change your life/

  1277. Jessie
    Posted December 22, 2009 at 12:57 am

    Well, for the record, I’ve read tons of classics. I’m a huge reader, I’ve read Charles Dickens, I love Shakespeare, I’m currently reading The Phantom of the Opera (my current obsession) and yes, I’ve read all the Twilight books. And yes, i liked them. I was very excited about them, and I was obsessed over them too, until my friend moved away. We obsessed over it together, but it was only fun until I was alone again. To tell the truth, I obsess over every book I read. I read it, and then I can’t stop thinking about it, until I read the next book. That’s just me.
    Yeah, the books weren’t classics, they weren’t amazing, and for those of you out there too stupid to already figure this out, duh, they aren’t realistic. But whoever said a book had to be realistic? Isn’t that the point? Edward is protective and sparkly, and I much prefer Alice, but who of you out there can’t honestly say that you haven’t imagined finding the perfect match for you? Obviously Edward isn’t it, but that’s what he represents. It’s sad when ignorant people can’t let everyone have their own opinion and can’t let somebody express theirself in writing. I think everyone is reading into the book and analyzing it way too much. Seriously, it’s just a book. Read it, enjoy it, or don’t. We don’t need the jerk responses to it. The truth hurts, but seriously, no one cares what you think. No one. Seriously. Just move on.

  1278. anonymous
    Posted December 22, 2009 at 4:31 am

    Dear Twitards-
    Anti’s don’t hate the book because it’s bad. They hate it because it’s bad and yet it is still so popular, and for this reason they are frustrated. They fear for the future of young minds and literature. Yes, I am an anti.

  1279. Gennie
    Posted December 22, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    I think I love you. My friend is doing a book report on New Moon and I was reading these to her as she did it, and she couldn’t deny them.
    Also, I hate that teen girls see Robert Pattinson or Taylor Lautner and automatically go “OMG EDWARD! OMG JACOB!” No. Try again. They are actors. Robert Pattinson does not glitter in sunlight and Taylor Lautner cannot suddenly sprout a fur coat and tail.

    Good talk.

  1280. May
    Posted December 23, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    yes your so right, all of my friends are twilight fans EXCEPT ME. oh and there are loads of grammatical errors, the only reason twilight fans dont see them is because they are stupid.

  1281. May
    Posted December 23, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    ok ive just read some of the comments. ok we know its a crap series…there’s no need to go on about it for about 10 paragraphs

  1282. lezlie
    Posted December 26, 2009 at 9:12 pm

    I love these books. Ok had to get that out there before I said that I cpmpletely agree with 94 of those statments, I dont agree with the whole ” Theres no sex therefore its not a vampire book” thats just stuipd. But I lagughed so hard, I have a friend whos read the whole series 9 times. I’m going to show her this list. :)

  1283. Drew
    Posted December 27, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    Amen to this

  1284. ellenour
    Posted December 28, 2009 at 12:41 am

    I have to agree to this. I’ve got a friend who LITERALLY thinks Edward is real. I think she’s waiting for him to walk into our school before she dates anyone. It’s kinda freaking me out now cause she read the books in January and it’s December now and she’s still obsessed. Intervention… Anyway i do have something to thank twilight 4. After everyone realised vampire books were a goldmine, a lot better vamp books came out *^-^*. And just adding a 96th reason to the list… ( note it’s a spoiler)…Edward started going out with Bella because he didn’t think she had a guardian angel and took it as a responsibility to protect her. He says in New moon ” it’s my job to protect you”… Read Midnight sun on her website to read ’bout Edward being Bella’s ‘Guardian Vampire’.
    I’m cool if people like Twilight just don’t Love twilight.
    Later.

  1285. Posted December 28, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    p(^.^p) kirby does not approve of Twilight so neither should you.

  1286. -grin-
    Posted December 29, 2009 at 7:57 pm

    To be honest I am an ex-Twilight fan. What got me off Twilight? Stephen King and Anne Rice. :) Those two are probably some of the greatest writers that I know. But while I was reading the book, I DID realize that the book was poorly written. Every other word was “Edward was beautiful” or “His lips were so beautiful”. She repeated too many things too many times and it got irritating. The only characters that are cool, as you’ve stated, are Jasper and Alice and they were barely in the book. SO retarded that the two interesting characters get no attention or action. *sigh*

    I have a question though…Why are Twitards so defensive of this book? I don’t understand how they can bash someone over the Internet just for having an opinion. :\ Sad really.

  1287. ellenour
    Posted December 30, 2009 at 2:13 am

    Well, i think a book is a book. I do agree with Kate though. Edward wouldn’t have even noticed Bella if it hadn’t been for her smell… Anyway, i have read the twilight series and i enjoyed the first two books but then i got completely board and didn’t enjoy the next two books at all. Eclipse just went on for too long and everyone i know but 1 person forgot storyline. But i just think people should get over twilight… It’s a book not life. Oh and also people PLEASE do not repeat what sum1 else wrote =( It gets incredibly annoying. And one final thing to ‘Fail’, though at the moment there are several different types of vampires in various books. That doesn’t mean a lot. Dracula was the first vampire book ( as far as i know, since I’m recently in high school and don’t know as much as quite a few of u) so shouldn’t the vampires be based on that type of vampire??? I heard the other day my friend say “I’m reading this new book, ye. and basically the girl can go into daylight, looks completely normal and has no vampire traits other than the fact that she drinks blood… She’s a blood drinking human!!!!” *^-^*

  1288. Sterling
    Posted December 30, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    I thought this list was great!
    Ten thumbs up!
    I found the Twilight saga to be very disturbing…It made me gag a few times…
    The worst part of the matter is that there is a Texas reading list for school in all AISD middle schools that has the Twilight book on it!
    If you do not get what this means, I’ll sum up…
    Thousands of kids 11-13(ish) are going to be forced to read a book about all that you-know-what!
    Drugs Violence other stuff!!!
    Children are are future, and this is what they are given to educate themselves.
    At this news I almost cried, not only is this going to disturb future generations, it also has a good chance of turning the future into a very dangerous place. A future filled with rabid-psycho teens with addictions and worse.
    I cry for the future.
    This is from a Twilight hating girl

  1289. Kelly
    Posted December 30, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    Lol. This list is funny. I remember when I tried to read the 1st book and I just couldn’t finish it. I thought it was way too dull. I then read through the rest of the series because I was curious as to why all these fangirls were obsessing over Edward. sigh. I got to the last book and that’s when I finally realized how messed up the series is. It’s borderline disturbing lol. :)

    Twilight is a disgrace to all vampire books. No fangs? Sparkles? “Vegetarian” vampires? yeah… -____-

    I lol’d at “Light Yagami does not approve…” ;D

  1290. Kelly
    Posted December 30, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    Lol. This list is funny. I remember when I tried to read the 1st book and I just couldn\’t finish it. I thought it was way too dull. I then read through the rest of the series because I was curious as to why all these fangirls were obsessing over Edward. sigh. I got to the last book and that\’s when I finally realized how messed up the series is. It\’s borderline disturbing lol. :)

    Twilight is a disgrace to all vampire books. No fangs? Sparkles? \”Vegetarian\” vampires? yeah… -____-

    I lol\’d at \”Light Yagami does not approve…\” ;D

  1291. April Harvee
    Posted January 1, 2010 at 12:28 pm

    No offense to who ever wrote this list but you obvicously haven’t read the books at all or well enough to understand what your talking about. For example:
    “4.And when he leaves she attempts to commit suicide.”
    Em Bella dosen’t try to kill herself actually. She dosen’t get the bikes and neither does she jump off the cliff to kill herself!! Read the book well enough and you’ll know why she done it. Atleast read the book before making a list about how terrible it was.
    “7.All the rules Meyer sets for being a vampire are broken by the end of the series.”ok to begin with vampires arent real so they’re is NO set rules for them. There can be no fact behind what a vampire is or is not because they don’t excist! Anyway when have you ever seen two vampire books with different authors who describe vampires exactly the same? Stephanie Meyer can make them whatever she wants to jackass. And so can everyone else for that matter.
    “9.The world population will come to an end because all girls who read this book will
    think they are Bella and will wait for their Edward to come until they are old. And he’ll never come.” Thats just reatarded your just saying dumb stuff now to fill up space.
    “11.Edward is too perfect and has no flaws either. Even vampires should have flaws besides wanting to suck human blood because it’s natural to them.” Actually he does. He becomes jealous in the 3rd book. In all the books he always feels unnessary guilty. He sometimes has temper problems. I’m sorry but I do believe these are flaws?
    “39.They use a drug reference in a book written for ten-year-olds.” Its actually written for TEENAGERS not 10 year olds who I doubt even have a long enough attention span for all 4 books.
    “55.They fall in love way too quickly and it seems fake because no one falls in love instantly, especially teenagers.” Yeah W/E. If you actually read the books you would understand there love is supposed to be like no other love has ever been before. Its supposed to be unreal and amazing unbelievable strong love.
    “59.She had only been in Forks for a month when Edward had been watching her sleep for two months.” I believe your referring to the movie? Yes well I agree with you there they did mess up a few times with the movie but that is neither the books fault or stephanies. So don’t bitch about them, bitch about the crappy director.
    “88.You are allowed to have your own opinion, just like we are allowed to have ours. Get over it. Twilight fans don’t seem to understand that though and attack at the mention of flaw in the book.” Yes I agree with you on everyone has an opinon and has a right to speak it. But what I hate about this list is the fact that you really don’t know what your talking about when it comes to twilight. Actually read the books before you do something like this yeah? More than half your points are wrong.

  1292. Hmm?
    Posted January 1, 2010 at 7:40 pm

    Can I just add you said Harry Potter is better. Well I’ve read both twilight and harry potter, all the books in each series or whatever you call it. And to be honest they both were a bit predictable I mean from the second book onwards it was obvious Harry was eventually going to kill Voldermort? So yeah basically twilight isen’t the only book thats predictable.

  1293. AliceWitch
    Posted January 2, 2010 at 9:06 am

    Oh by the way… did any of you know that the guy who played edward, in the film, is actually IN a harry potter movie?! my sister piionted it ouit to me!! have look!! its the one were they have to fight the dragons or something… i’m not sure, never been much of a fan!!…

    Cheers!

  1294. Christina
    Posted January 3, 2010 at 1:57 am

    Yeah, I agree with everything here. I use to be a small time fan, back when it wasn’t popular.

    And the actors. Give me a break. All of them pathetic. Someone sent me a message saying to me:

    hi!!!!!!!!!!! christina ugly i know you hate kristen stewart!!!!!!!
    all people hate you too!!!!!!!!!!!
    kristen stewart is more beautiful than you!!!!!
    you look like a dead cat!!!!!!
    you just join the group
    to said kristen
    she sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    you suck too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! kristena ly
    you look like a douche
    freak!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    First of all, I’m a a model. -.- Nice to know I look like a dead cat..
    Second of all, yes, I joined a group like that a year ago. Then I left like weeks after. She added me on facebook just send met this message, and comment that I was ugly on all my pictures. Honesty, this kid was 11. My faith in the youth is slowly deteriorating.

  1295. Jackie
    Posted January 3, 2010 at 4:29 am

    First of all, I love everybody here who agrees that Twilight is possibly the worst series to ever be introduced to the public eye.

    I mean, who the hell thinks 108-year-old sparkly virgins are sexy? No. They are not.

    My only criticism of your list is that it is not nearly long enough. There are just too many things wrong with Twilight, and no list ever made will be able to house them all.

    Long story short, all Twilight paraphernalia must be burnt beyond recognition, and Harry Potter books should be passed out to Twilight fans as proof that good reading material does, in fact, exist.

    Peace.

  1296. Posted January 3, 2010 at 8:05 pm

    I wonder if Stephine Meyer ever saw an add for erectile dysfunction…? Maybe if she had, she would have realized how impossible “Nessie” is.

  1297. Emi
    Posted January 4, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    Okay……..

    Reading this gave me even more of a reason to burn my Twilight books. I liked the books when I was in middle school, but now the whole Twilight thing is getting ridiculous, not to mention annoying.

    Oh and………

    60. There’s something disturbing about Carlisle turning only teenagers into vampires.

    89. Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.

    I almost pissed my pants when I read those.

  1298. tara
    Posted January 5, 2010 at 11:34 pm

    I thoroughly enjoyed this. However, what of those girl who think that reading the “saga” counts as actual reading? Additionally, I agree that the list could be MUCH longer. But, who wants to waste any more time on twilight?

    Loved #18, by the way. Extreme Harry Potter fanatic, but not in the twilight way (obviously), as I enjoy reading books with a plot.

    And last, I have a male friend that said he attempted to read the twilight books. He did fairly well, almost got to breaking dawn, but could not force himself to read any more. Thus, he re-read the Narnia series to compensate for this.

  1299. Posted January 8, 2010 at 1:42 am

    Yeah, I was one of those “I HATE Twilight” “I Hate walking by Hot Topic and seeing TWILIGHT TWILIGHT TWILIGHT” I was the one that didn’t understand why everyone made such a BIG GOD**** Deal about this DAMN Movie… I didn’t know they were books… My little cousin, just a month 1/2 ago made me watch Twilight with her… I was half asleep… and when I woke up the next morning.. I felt the urge to read the books… My Aunt (WHO IS 30 MIND YOU) Gave me Twilight and New Moon (soft cover) because my uncle bought her the whole saga in the Hardcover edition..
    Well I read those two books in one week… I was absolutely hooked… enthralled in the books, and even though I do not like the movies so much, it’s great to see someones envision of the characters on screen… It’s almost tangible..
    And to say “BELLA HAS A MANLY VOICE” is absolutely stupid.. Bella is a Fictional Character.. Kristen Stewart is NOT Bella.
    I don’t think I would read Twilight or New moon again for a few years, but I would Read Breaking Dawn again.. and Possibly Eclipse..
    So I don’t know… Maybe you have to try something new to find a New love for something..
    And Im someone who reads J.RR Tolkien books… and I love ‘What Dreams may Come’

    -CEARA

  1300. Posted January 8, 2010 at 1:47 am

    OH and btw it CLEARLY states in the books .. Jacobs friend… Who Imprinted on a little girl.. Yeah… He loves the little girl like his own sister.. It’s not like he’s going to rape the poor thing.. .Just like Jacob with Renesme… It’s almost beautiful… You wouldn’t understand if you never read it.. it’s not even close to being a pedophile type situation

  1301. jake
    Posted January 9, 2010 at 9:38 am

    why are all you twilight fans looking up “why i hate twilight” because if you are so in love with twilight wouldn’t you be looking up “why i love twilight” btw check out mylifeistwilight.com now they are some true tragics, if i ever see the person who plays edward i will punch him in the face and kick him till i break all his ribs, he should be ashamed of himself

  1302. glass
    Posted January 9, 2010 at 11:35 am

    i absolutely agree with julie!!!

  1303. Bravo Delta Sierra Mike ;)
    Posted January 10, 2010 at 7:59 pm

    As a teenage masochist, I can pretty safely say that Edward’s affection on Bella is almost beyond kinky and her dependence on him is not normal. The whole ‘watching you while you sleep’ is cute if the couple is supposed to be in the room together, if one of the couple is on their deathbed and injured, or in any other ‘cute’ scenarios. ‘I have nothing better to do’ doesn’t fit in there.

    For those of you saying Jacob + Renesmee is normal and cute and ‘beautiful’… Wtf. I may not know much about beauty, but if you have a sixteen year old boy that’s obsessed with an INFANT to the degree he can’t think about other women… I mean, come on, what boy–or man as Jacob would soon be–would not revert to incest after so long. By the time she’d be legal he would be thirty four! Thirty four!

    Actually, Rob isn’t as stupid as I thought. He posted some comments about how awful of a book it was and how ‘It seemed like he was reading something that wasn’t meant to be published’ XPPP

  1304. dead.
    Posted January 11, 2010 at 11:40 am

    i found this so true and hilarious up to about point 60. but you killed it.

  1305. Harper
    Posted January 15, 2010 at 12:00 am

    I wish that Tyler’s van had just crushed Bella in the first book. It woulda saved a lot of headaches.

    Go Team Tyler’s Van!

  1306. Katherine
    Posted January 16, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    GUESS WHAT?! I LOVE TWILIGHT! MAKES THE WORLD GO ROUND! SCREW YOU ALL! MOST OF YOU SIT AT HOME READING THEM ALL DAY LONG.

  1307. Fed up
    Posted January 17, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    Hey these people are jusk asking to be trolled r haxed.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/TheVolturiMilitia
    Some one plz do it!!!

  1308. Me, myself, and I
    Posted January 18, 2010 at 3:00 am

    This list is amazing. I agreed on almost every point. Amazing job! It definitely needs to be longer, though. There are so many other reasons that people hate twilight!!

    And the reason the Twilighters attack at any mention of a flaw in the book is because they know it’s true.

  1309. Natalie
    Posted January 18, 2010 at 7:03 am

    Here’s my list bestiality, necrophilia, teenage pregnancy, pedophilia and stalkers.

  1310. Alex
    Posted January 18, 2010 at 5:22 pm

    I found some of Sarah’s reasons here, but this girl explains why and everything. It’s pretty good. Check it out!

    http://cinemaroll.com/romance/thirty-reasons-why-i-hate-twilight/

    P.S. You may have to copy and past.

  1311. alpochino
    Posted January 19, 2010 at 6:59 am

    every reason is so true. couldn’t agree more. they should have made it 100 reasons though:

    96. cause in the fourth book, it has no true ending, whether it was happy or not.
    97. EVERY book should have a problem and a lesson, but does Eclipse have any of those? answer: no.
    98. the second book has no point whatsoever.
    99. what does it teach?
    100. Harry potter is better in more than 100 ways.

  1312. BoB
    Posted January 19, 2010 at 10:27 am

    I love the twilight saga n I believe that it is an amazing series and I love the actor and everything about it! Robert Pattinson<3! I was quite upset when I read! I know it is you opinion but you need to respect that some people may like the book! As a fan I understand that not evreyone likes it and I try to not talk about it too much but I dont belive that even you think it is that bad!!!!! I would like to see you write 4 books!! Stephinie Mayer is an amazing writer!! U like harry potter i dont but i dont go writing 10000000000 things i hate about it!! You need to grow up!!

  1313. Harry Potter Fan No. 2000001113
    Posted January 23, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    *applauds* Right on!

  1314. ada and zoey
    Posted January 23, 2010 at 7:57 pm

    you people are messed up!! especially the first people who commented! i mean, you guys made this entire website for absolutly no reason!!! thats just messed up!!!!! twilight haters are so lieing about most of thoes things and bella did not comit suiside and doesent have a MAN VOICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and yes we are twilight lovers we love twilight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  1315. Twilight is as a hype as H1N1
    Posted January 25, 2010 at 9:09 pm

    i think those reasons are awesome! come to think of it, Twilight realy is about nothing. Someone told me that the titles (Twilight-New Moon-Eclipse-Breaking Dawn) is the showing progression through the night, and symbolic of some stuff, blah, blah, blah . . . Doesn’t the author kow that a New Moon is out during the day?

  1316. Posted January 26, 2010 at 1:51 am

    Not only do I COMPLETELY agree, I wrote a song parody about it too. Love it, share it, tell all your friends:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNeRjjnSNTQ

  1317. Posted January 26, 2010 at 1:51 am

    Not only do I COMPLETELY agree, I wrote a song parody about it too. Love it, share it, tell all your friends:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNeRjjnSNTQ

  1318. Shinzou
    Posted January 28, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    join the we hate twilight facebook :P
    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=252724763256&ref=ts

  1319. julia
    Posted January 29, 2010 at 8:20 pm

    i’ve read all for books and i loved them. i thought they were good. i agree with a few a your reasons like they fell in love so fast and how edward is obsessed with bella, but some your reasons like he sparkles are just stupid. but still you do have some really good reasons that i never noticed before.

  1320. Julianna
    Posted January 29, 2010 at 10:47 pm

    Wow, good reasons.

    It barely has anything to do with the fact that it is not the usual vampire, if you read the list well enough you would see that it is two perfect characters who fall in love and they have no flaws whatsoever, and therefore the plot development seriously fails after you actually take a moment to think about the book. Ha ha ha, whoever said why would you google this Twilight fans, that is so true. But the things like no fangs, sparkling just adds to how he has no flaws and there is no real deep action or thinking. He has OBVIOUSLY read literature, by the way, because he seems to know about development and deeper literature than most who love Twilight.

    Ha ha ha, love the Chuck Norris point! I love your reasons! Some good comments by the way!

  1321. Anna
    Posted January 30, 2010 at 12:50 pm

    I think that honestly a lot of your reasons are really true like….HE STALKS HER!….AND SHES OKAY WITH THAT!
    But it was not really a HORRIBLE book…like, you can read it for fun, but i do agree that some girls goo wayy over board and are obsessed so yaa i partially agre with you(:

  1322. bookworm718
    Posted January 31, 2010 at 1:26 am

    While I agree that Twilight is pretty pathetic, most of your reasons that you hate Twilight are totally irrelevant and worse than anything Stephanie Meyer ever wrote. I mean really, does the fact that Chuck Norris could beat Edward really have anything to do with how good the books are???

  1323. Tiffany
    Posted January 31, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    I like how you put SPOILER after the fact. LOL.

    “If the first 200 pages of your book rely on the mystery of a character’s identity, don’t slap “First, Edward was a vampire” on the back cover.” —Wait, are your SERIOUS??

    All in all, I thought your list was hilarious and I couldn’t agree more with it. However, I have to admit that I think I could muster up some respect for the novels, if for the most part, the fans weren’t such assholes. They have become so enamored with these books, that EVERYTHING is compared to them, even series that came out years before Twilight. What’s more, I’m suprised that many of the people (at least ones I’ve come into contact with) who have never picked up a book outside of required reading or don’t even read regularly, think that these are some great work of art. And just to be fair, I did try to read the first book–”try” being the operative word. The style of writing seemed VERY juvenile to me.

    Either way, I should have known I wouldn’t like the books, since readers included girls in my school, who would never pick up a book to save their lives.

    Blah…now that I think about it, there are a lot more things you could add to this list! Why stop at 95? Keep going!!

  1324. Robin
    Posted February 4, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    I love how all the ‘haters’ of Twilight can’t seem to stop talking about it. Yet they say they hate it. Suck it up and move on if you don’t like it so much, and stop ruining it for the people who do.

  1325. Readme
    Posted February 4, 2010 at 6:28 pm

    I first heard of Stephanie Meyer and the Twilight series when Business Week ran an article about her and the Twilight series and how her first book was going to be made into a movie. They noted her revolutionary approach to writing the series.

    Apparently a lot of the aspects of the plot were coming from the fans themselves. She dialogued heavily with her fans on the internet, basically asking them what they wanted to see (read) and giving it to them. The article applauded her for this novel approach to writing.

    I had a chance to read some of the books over the summer and they are quite laughable. I am a pretty fast and proficient reader and basically read through the book in a few hours spread over a few days. They reminded me of those Goosebumps books I read as a kid. Juvenile. This phase will pass and hopefully Meyer’s legion of fans will move on to more substantial literature.

  1326. Larissa
    Posted February 7, 2010 at 9:05 pm

    This was quite funny; I had a good giggle in my room. I do agree with pretty much every point that has been raised in this – blog? (I’m not sure if that’s correct – I stole the link off facebook; not the point).

    The realism of the book is quite laughable, yes, but, I saw the movie first, and perhaps fell victim to the VILF. Not victim; wrong choice of words, but, Robert Pattinson has an english accent, looks incredibly decent, and has an “I just walked out of the woods and I’m all man,” aura about him. So, reading the books, I envisioned a sex god. Basically, that is the only reason I came to read – nee – listen to the saga.

    No girl thinks that Edward Cullen actually exists; and if they do – well, delusional. It’s nice to have the idea of him for a second, but, frankly, I think you would get bored of a “Jake Pveltka.” (anyone seen the latest season of the Bachelor). Women don’t like the uber nice, perfect man. But, it is easy to fall for the dangerous vampire who may/may not be dangerous; and he’s only bad when he’s not around you. I suppose that’s slightly endearing. I totally agree with the VILF idea; and not Edward Cullen, rather Robert Pattinson. Perhaps he is the only reason this has spiralled out of control.

    Bella and the whole gang are dumb. Carlisle is a creep. The book is fair at best, the only way I would suggest to bear the novel is via audiobook – where time cannot truly be wasted. I do think it’s a nice fairytale for fourth graders (maybe ones that are a little twisted)

    Thanks for the thoughts – I really enjoyed them.

  1327. Secret
    Posted February 10, 2010 at 10:04 pm

    wow. You have impressed me by this post. Its like you crawled in my brain and took the thoughts right out of there. My anger about the fan population has gone down a bit as i can now see that i am not alone in this hatred for this silly little series

  1328. Posted February 15, 2010 at 1:12 pm

    Holy Moly!

  1329. hater
    Posted February 15, 2010 at 4:26 pm

    96. because Bella starts doing all the housework just like that when she moves in with her dad

  1330. emma
    Posted February 15, 2010 at 10:14 pm

    omg! i love this list. rotfl!!!!!!!!! go harry potter — even percy jackson could kick edward’s ass without even giving it 2 thoughts.

  1331. bacon
    Posted February 15, 2010 at 10:46 pm

    you are my hero. i completly agree and you know how the book is targeted towards tweens? im 11, and all i have to say is that the books AND the movie both sucked. only me and a group including 2 other people in my entire class of 24 students dont like the series at all. ive only read some of the first book and couldnt take any more. im very sorry to say, that harry potter 10,000 times better than twilight but i couldnt get to the end of the first book of harry potter, even. thanks but I’ll stick to the great guardians of ga’ hoole, the warriors series, and the seekers series by erin hunter. (by the way bacon is a nickname my friend gave me for loving bacon at breakfast time) XD :3 :D

  1332. Paula
    Posted February 17, 2010 at 8:37 am

    Thanks!!!You make my day!!
    Greeting from Holland!!

  1333. Tabby Guin
    Posted February 23, 2010 at 3:17 pm

    1. Bella is a perfect character (“Mary Sue”), which Meyer hides by calling her clumsy.

    Bella is far from a perfect character. She is from a broken home and hasn’t spent quality time with her father in years. She’s conflicted with her own self worth and at times is suicidal.

    2. Being clumsy is not a flaw if Edward always catches her.

    Edward doesn’t always catch her. Where is he in New Moon? She is alone for months and when she finally lets Jake in her disappears as well.

    3. She can’t do anything without Edward.

    Have you even read the books? Before Edward she is perfectly capable to doing things. i.e. going to La Push with friends and going to first beach. When Edward leaves her yes, she suffers from depression and suicidal tendencies but she’s is perfectly able to continue her life even though she’s in pain.

    4. And when he leaves she attempts to commit suicide.

    She doesn’t technically attempt suicide. She was going to let herself drown yes, but that was an after thought it wasn’t planned. From an outsiders perspective she was so in love with him being too far caused physical pain.

    5. Meyer is living out her own fantasies by writing about Bella, who is clearly herself.

    Isn’t that what most authors do? I was under the impression that most fictional writers, write what they know. Even putting parts of themselves into their characters. J.K. Rowling does the same thing with her characters.

    6. The books aren’t well written, just because every other word is a fancy adjective doesn’t make it good writing.

    Are you kidding me? They are extremely well written and the attention to detail is fantastic.

    7. All the rules Meyer sets for being a vampire are broken by the end of the series.

    That’s the good thing about writing fiction. You don’t have to write by others guidelines. Sure Vampires were always seen in a certain way. It’s what makes her books original and easy to read. She took something everyone knows about and changed it. Making it more interesting.

    8. Not only that, she breaks rules set by more esteemed authors.

    Just because another author writes about the same subject doesn’t mean it can’t be changed. If everyone thought that way, there would never be anything new and exciting. Lets take Harry Potter for example. I’ve read all of those books as well and Like them too. But writing about a gay headmaster who spends time with an adolescent boy could be seen in the wrong way too.

    9. The world population will come to an end because all girls who read this book will think they are Bella and will wait for their Edward to come until they are old. And he’ll never come.

    Are you kidding me? Really? Where are the girls who believe they are Cinderella waiting for Prince Charming. Where are the girls waiting for their magical letter delivered by an owl so the can attend a “Magic School.” Do you even think before you speak?

    10. Bella almost dies fifty thousand times, but Edward always saves her. This is boring.

    That statement is untrue. She almost dies a handful amount of times but it isn’t always Edward who saves her. There is also Jacob. Carlisle. The rest of the Cullen’s.

    11. Edward is too perfect and has no flaws either. Even vampires should have flaws besides wanting to suck human blood because it’s natural to them.

    Really. Edward is a complete masochist. He stays with Bella even though he is in pain because the smell of her blood is so sweet. His flaw is his love and obsession with Bella. He wants to protect her, but doesn’t want to change her. He leaves Bella thinking it’s for her own good. His way of thinking is flawed.

    12. The reason the books became so popular is because Bella has no personality and any loser can put themselves in her shoes.

    I don’t even know where to begin with this. Firstly if Bella didn’t have a personality she wouldn’t be as popular. She loves unconditionally and risks her own life for her true love. She is loving, outgoing, shy, and I could go on.

    13. If Bella is so ‘plain’, why do so many guys fall for her within the first two chapters?

    For that reason. Bella isn’t plain, she only sees herself as plain. Men like a woman who is beautiful and doesn’t know it. If Bella was walking around like “I’m so hot. I’m so hot.” Men would be bored with her. Because she’d be like any girl who’s full of herself.

    14. Bella teaches women to let the man handle everything, which pretty much is a huge step backward for women everywhere, who have fought for equality.

    That’s also untrue. Bella holds a job and does a damn good job of taking care of her father. Just because she’s more of the “stay at home mom” type means little. Some women prefer to stay home and be taken care of. Some women want careers. Some want to be old fashioned and taken care of. It isn’t wrong for someone to want to be taken care of. Edward listens to her and they work through things like any normal couple. Equality has nothing to do with it.

    15. Isn’t it convenient that her father always leaves her alone and doesn’t question her? Real parents aren’t that way.

    Charlie is a good dad. He’s the chief of police and for 17 years has only had himself to worry about. He’s not overbearing because he trusts Bella. Some “real” parents aren’t that great either. Some people have children and chose to leave them. Not everyone has a storybook ending. It is real, and close to home for a lot of readers.

    16&17 Lack of character development.
    Bella is a useless, whining, doll that suddenly has become the idol for girls everywhere.

    Those are your personal opinions. The book is about Bella and Edward the other characters are secondary.

    18. People say that Twilight is better than Harry Potter. Guess what? WRONG.

    Personally I like both. They’re very different and original. Just because you don’t like one doesn’t mean other people are wrong. Everyone is allowed their own opinions you don’t have to tear them down for not agreeing.

    19 Edward is extremely possessive, border-line abusive, and boring as anything.

    He might be possessive but he isn’t abusive or boring. He’s hard to figure out and he goes against nature being in love with Bella.

    20. It’s too cliché

    Let me get this right. First you say that other Authors have it better and Stephenie Meyer is breaking rules. Now you’re saying it’s too cliché… Interesting. You’ve just contradicted yourself.

    21. This book contains no real sex, so it’s not really a vampire novel.

    Just because other Vampire novels contain lots of sex doesn’t mean you can knock twilight for not having it. I think it sends a great message to her demographic. To wait until marriage for sex. There are too many young teens pregnant and making the wrong choices. She’s sending a great message to her young readers.

    22. Read Anne Rice – those are vampires, not the girly men that Meyer has created.

    So Anne Rice’s Vampires are not girly? Hmmm shaking in their “fangs” because of garlic and holy water just screams manly to me.

    23. You don’t have to describe the character every two pages, we know all about Edward’s ‘perfectly toned chest’ the fourth time she mentions it.

    She’s making it a point to get her descriptions imbedded into our minds so we can clearly picture what she’s saying. It makes reading more enjoyable.

    24. Bella reflects upon herself through the entire novel to tell important plot developments. Hey Meyer, ever heard of “Show, don’t tell”?

    I’m not even wasting my breath on this.

    25. She never uses the word fangs in the entire book series, and it’s supposedly about vampire.

    Which is one of the things I really liked. The idea of fangs was never big for me. This coming from someone who owns all 7 seasons of Buffy. It makes them more human. I like it.

    26. Her vampires sparkle. Enough said.

    Which is why it took me so long to see the movie and read the books. Her vampires are designed to be the worlds deadliest predator. Everything about them draws in their prey. Their looks, their voice, their scent. The sparkling is to enchant the humans. It’s genius.

    27. Supposedly Meyer never uses the word ‘said’ in the entire first book, instead using breath

    “That’s Edward and Emmett Cullen, and Rosalie and Jasper Hale. The one who left was Alice Cullen; they all live together with Dr. Cullen and his wife.” She said this under her breath.

    taken from Twilight Pg. 20 lines 9-12

    28-30
    There is too much face touching.
    It’s predictable, and childish.
    We read the entire series just to laugh at the stupidity of it.

    The face touching is sweet. It’s not very predictable. I’m sure you didn’t predict Renesmee’s birth. So what does that say about you reading a book to laugh at it without using an open mind. You went in close minded.

    31. Meyer can’t think of original names. The only original name she used was Rennesme, which is combination of two names and doesn’t count.

    It’s correct spelling is Renesmee. And most of the characters are from another time meaning there weren’t very unique names. It makes it seem more real to use names of people you could actually have in class with you.

    32. Vampires can’t get people pregnant. SPOILER!

    Where do you think the term Succubus came from. She just used it in a new way.

    33. Vampire baseball was just a disgrace.

    Your opinion. I think it shows that not all vampires are mindless and blood crazy. They can have feelings and wanting to be normal is unique to her story.

    34. People think Meyer is the best writer ever.

    Some do. So what. Everyone has opinions.

    35. The plot drags on forever, when it really could have been completed in two books.

    The point is to show what Edward and Bella go through in order to be together. Their struggles together and apart. Some people could say that Harry Potter’s plot drags on and on. Every book he faces danger and the real battle isn’t until the end. So again. People have opinions.

    36. Wow, yet another ‘original’ plot of forbidden love.

    It is original. Name another book where the “man” Is in love with the woman and it is physically painful for him to be near her because her blood sings to him.

    37. Why is it called the Twilight Series if only one book is titled Twilight?

    Because Twilight is the safest time of day for them. New Moon. Eclipse. Breaking Dawn. Really you couldn’t figure it out on your own?

    38. It’s too easy to mock. Go on Youtube, how many mocks on Twilight do you see?

    But people are still talking about it. The more people mock it. The more other people will want to read and or see the real thing to see what the “hype” is all about.

    39. They use a drug reference in a book written for ten-year-olds.

    This coming from the same person who complained there wasn’t any sex. Are you really sure you think before you talk? A reference is fine. It doesn’t talk about people using.

    40. Stephanie Meyer creates some interesting characters ie: Jasper and Alice. She then ignores them, and gives them no development.

    Because the book isn’t about Jasper and Alice. They tell you enough but they don’t need to really develop them.

    41. Every Other Facebook bumper sticker is about Twilight/Edward. EVERY OTHER ONE.

    Because it’s popular…

    42. Fangirls are so blinded by their love for Edward that they don’t realize the book is terrible.

    I’m a married mother of two and I’m not blinded by love for Edward. Personally Jasper or Carlisle would be my favorites. The books are captivating and a really good read. If given the chance and read with an open mind.

    43. Stephen King agrees that Stephanie Meyer can’t write ‘worth a darn’.

    And Stephen King admitted that most of his books were written while he was high on cocaine…. So is he really reliable. He’s a hell of a writer. But he doesn’t remember writing half the books he has.

    44-51# It’s stupid.
    # Bella.
    # Bella is Edward’s beard.
    # Meyer wrote four books about nothing, really.
    # Straight men sparkle?
    # It’s teeming with grammatical errors.
    # Bella Swan means beautiful swan, which is horribly cheesy.
    Edward Cullen is sparkly; crows like sparkly things.

    Really? It’s a book! Why are you so bent out of shape over a book. Her name may or may not be cheesy, it’s all a matter of personal preference.

    52. # Do any guys actually like Twilight?

    My husband for one. And his favorite author is Stephen King. What does that tell you?

    53. If the first 200 pages of your book rely on the mystery of a character’s identity, don’t slap “First, Edward was a vampire” on the back cover.

    Okay just because us the readers know that Edward is a vampire to start doesn’t change that fact that Bella doesn’t… We can tell Harry is going to be a wizard at the beginning of HP.

    54. There’s far too little actual conflict in the story. But this probably stems from having a flawless main character

    Seriously? There are plenty of conflicts. A lot in the first book. Then saving Edward in New Moon. The conflicts between the wolves and vamps…

    55. They fall in love way too quickly and it seems fake because no one falls in love instantly, especially teenagers.

    Some people do. Just because you don’t, doesn’t mean you should automatically assume that everyone is the same.

    56. They only love each other because she smells good and he’s hot. There’s no other given reason why.

    They get to know each other. They love each other for their flaws as well as their inner beauty. Edward can’t read Bella’s mind. SO he has to work for information. He loves her selflessness. Bella is so shy and self-loathing and Edward makes her feel loved and special.

    57. It’s just not healthy to teach young girls that True Love involves the guy watching you while you sleep.

    It never says he watches her because it’s true love. It’s because he’s fascinated by her. How old are you? Have you never woke up next to your significant other and watched them sleep? I have.

    58. Edward is HOT. We get it.

    Okay and Harry Potter is the boy who survived. He who must not be named… blah blah blah.

    59. She had only been in Forks for a month when Edward had been watching her sleep for two months.

    Don’t talk about things you know nothing about

    60. There’s something disturbing about Carlisle turning only teenagers into vampires.

    He changed Edward first, because his mother pleaded with Carlisle to save him. Next he changed Esme his wife who was 26 years old when she was changed. Not a teen. Next was Rosalie Hale who was 18 which is technically an adult. He felt bad for Edward and wanted him to have a companion. She was left for dead. She would have died. He did what he thought was right. Next was Emmett. Who he changed only because Rosalie brought him in covered in blood and dying. He was 20 when he was changed. Also not a teen. Alice was 19 and wasn’t changed by Carlisle and Jasper was 20 also not changed by Carlisle. Edward was the only true teen at 17.

    61. All Twilight fans are insane, proved by several responses to criticism such as…

    Am I insane? I’m just calling you out on your opinions and contradicting them.

    64. Isn’t funny how Twilight fans can’t spell and use proper capitalization? By the way, 61, 62, and 63 are real

    Funny. I’m a Twilight fan and I have no, problem with spelling.

    65-68 re absurd and I won’t comment on those

    69. Vampires vs. werewolves (isn’t that a Facebook application and such a original idea?)

    Considering the werewolves are technically shape shifters from an American Indian tribe I think it’s very original.

    70. There’s nothing worse than a fan girl going insane over a fictional guy. It’s rather pathetic actually, so, um, yeah, get a life and keep reading those books, chickies

    Just because I’m a fan girl doesn’t mean that I’m going “insane” over a fictional guy. I’m happily married and a dedicated mom. I have a pretty good life. Who do you think you are to put down everyone?

    71-72 Why did you read the books knowing you weren’t going to like them?

    73 WWJTFD: What Would a Judgmental Twilight Fan Do? Answer: attempt to attack with the ‘cool vampire powers’ they gained from reading the series. Awesome!

    Personally I would attack you with real facts and knowledge. Versus tearing you down as a person calling you insane and “dumb” as you’ve called us.

    74. Even if you like the book, it doesn’t live up to its hype.

    I disagree. I think it did very well.

    75. Edward is a good VILF, that’s it

    Is that you admitting you find Robert Patterson attractive as Edward. And before you answer may I remind you he also played Cedric Diggory.

    76. “And I cried numerous times upon realizing there would never be an Edward in this world.” – quoted from Almuvira Anona on Yahoo Answers.

    So some fans are upset, but isnt’ that proving they know it’s fiction?

    77. A hundred years difference = pedophile.

    What would you call Angel and Buffy than. He’s much older than she is. Just because he’s technically 100 years older means nothing when physically he’s frozen at 17.

    78. It’s a co-dependent relationship stripped down to the bare essentials. Girl: “I can’t live without you. I want to change myself to be with you.” Boy: “If you leave me, I will kill myself.”

    She wants to change to be with him forever, since one lifetime is not enough. And he would kill himself if Bella was dead. Because he can’t live in a world where she doesn’t exist.

    79. Stephanie Meyer must really be into pedophilia: first Edward and Bella, now Jacob and Renesseme? SPOILER.

    Again with your spelling. tsk tsk. Jacob will be there as a friend for Renesmee until she needs him as something else. Since Jacob won’t physically age while he still phases into a werewolf it means little. Since in 7 years Renesmee will be physically and mentally 17 because of her rate of growth.

    80-82

    80 isn’t worth my time commenting. Chuck Norris could take him? PLEASE. Bella’s deep thoughts aren’t all about Edward. What about sacrificing herself to James to save her mother and the Cullen’s.

    84. Jacob, who didn’t abuse Bella and was nice to her, was dumped and she chose Edward. Hmm, masochistic much?

    Bella and Jacob never actually dated. He picked up the pieces that Edward shattered, but she wasn’t over him.

    85. Ms. Meyer writes the way I did when I was twelve years old, doodling in my journal.

    It’s Mrs. Meyer. And if you wrote this good at twelve how is it she’s a published author and you are not?

    86. “It would have been much better if Jacob and Edward discovered they were gay: no sequels, no whiny Bella. Amen to that.”

    Wow. You say that but you’re a fan of Harry Potter. A 7 book series who’s plot can sometimes be all over the place…

    87. Many people have enjoyed the making of this, many have helped with it too…in other words lots of people hate Twilight.

    People are afraid of what they don’t understand. Lots of people also make fun of Harry Potter. Because it goes against the Christian way. How does it feel stooping so low to hurt other people?

    88. You are allowed to have your own opinion, just like we are allowed to have ours. Get over it. Twilight fans don’t seem to understand that though and attack at the mention of flaw in the book

    Perhaps if you had any valid attacks perhaps you wouldn’t have the Twilight supporters going crazy at you. Like you said I’m allowed my opinion. SO I’m going to tell you what I think..

    89-95
    # Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you.
    # “Cause it’s dumb.” – Random Person on the Street
    # “It’s annoying as hell.” – Random Person on the Street #2
    # Martin Luther would not have not have approved if the book was written during his lifetime.
    # Harry Potter could beat Edward any day with his magic powers.
    # It’s offensive to the entire human race, both male and female.
    # The book was so bad we wrote 95 reasons why we hate it.

    Really? Really? You are titled to your opinion but calling a book dumb. And or Annoying. Writing about deceased people and what their opinions might have been. It’s fine that you hate it. I think it’s really comical that you and a bunch of your friends got together to bash a book. Are you waiting for your acceptance letter to Hogwarts? Are you jealous of Bella because she found her true love and you never will. If you are not open minded you won’t make it very far in the real world.

    Adios
    Tabitha Guin

  1334. Danielle
    Posted February 23, 2010 at 6:29 pm

    Im a fan but i have to admit the books are written well but at least get the facts right.. she didntt try to commit suicide she jumped off a cliff into the water to hear his voice.. dumbass

  1335. AlexanderK
    Posted February 24, 2010 at 8:01 pm

    and miss give me more sex don’t tell anymore?

    Tabby Guin is like the christians in your door!!

  1336. Sarah
    Posted February 24, 2010 at 10:06 pm

    Most of the things in this list made me laugh so hard.

    I read Twilight a couple years ago, and thought it was O.K (Meaning I could get through it without reading it halfway and being unable to read anymore). Then the movie came out. It was a very bad movie. That’s all I’m going to say.

    I decided to give Stephanie Meyers another chance. A year after I officially owned New Moon, I picked it up and read it. Again, it was O.K. Then I saw the movie. WORST MOVIE OF MY LIFE! Every time I saw a commercial for “the best romance movie of the year”, I yelled, “No, no, no!” at the T.V until the commercial had ended.

    And my best friend is an absolute Twilight freak. She has a pillow with Edward, Jacob, and Bella on it, and every night she kisses Edward, punches Jacob, and hugs Bella. Oh, and she’s read the series 7 times!!! (Yes, I said 7 times!) I have no idea why she likes it so much. I think she has developed an unhealthy obsession. Yep.

  1337. Izzie Redwood
    Posted February 25, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    i totally agree with what u said but that didn’t stop me from becoming overly-obbessed.. (don’t worry im fine now) it was kinda like chocolate.. complete crap but u still want more :(

  1338. TwilightH8r426
    Posted February 26, 2010 at 11:44 pm

    okay this is sooo true especially about the vampire getting human girl preggers part i mean if no blood flows through his body how can blodd go to his d!ck and give him a boner??
    it doesnt make sense…besides, they are TWO SEPARATE SPECIES AND SPECIES REPRODUCE WITHIN THE SPECIES IT JACKS UP THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD!!

  1339. lala
    Posted February 27, 2010 at 2:15 am

    CF,

    Think of it this way: Due to young teenage girls realizing their hope for her Edward too late, the newest spin on sexual selection left vastly superior intellectual minds to mingle with the wide selection of the male species, leaving out deficiency. Women, of course, play the selection role in our evolutionary play. They wisely mate with males of the better genes and produce healthy, feminist babies.

    Ah, Darwin, if only, if only.

    Everyone, let’s congratulate Stephanie Meyer for her unexpected contribution to evolution.

  1340. Loony Colleen Granger
    Posted February 27, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    Are you kidding me? Smeyer is a genius! She wrote total crap, and half of the population has read it, whether to make fun of it or they actually wanted to read it, and now she’s rich. Simple as that.

  1341. Impressed
    Posted February 27, 2010 at 11:31 pm

    LOL..that was pretty funny……haha good job to whoever made this. I read twilight…i got infected by the obsessive disease for a while but i got over it…..now the only reason why i bother with it is because of TAYLOR LAUTNER…i mean…what i hate the most is that Stephanie Meyer wrote the book, and described Edward to be this super perfect guy and then the movie comes out and the best she had was Robert Pattinson???? What the efff???? So stupid….

  1342. Monet
    Posted February 28, 2010 at 10:09 am

    well good for you because you must not have any life if you sat here on the computer and posted 95 reasons why you hate twilight. i know its your opinion, but so what if people like twilight isn’t it their life. and i didn’t see any people coming to me saying whats your address, phone # because I’m going to come and behead you. so great job for the person or people who wrote this cause they have no life

  1343. VampireAcademyIsWayMoreBetterthanTwilight
    Posted February 28, 2010 at 10:14 pm

    Ok, lets settle this debate, Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings are Literature Masterpieces and they are too good to be compared to Twilight in anyway, plus they have completely different stories altogether. What is most likely to be compared to the ‘Twilight Series’ is the ‘Vampire Academy Series’, they are both about Vampires and Romance. In my Opinion ‘Vampire Academy’ kicks ‘Twilight’ to the Kerb, cause it has a much better story, its about, Friendship, Romance and has alot of Action and Battles, where as Twilight is a copy of all other Romantic Novels except it has Vampires in it, the Story is lame and boring and lastly it is Badly written and not to mention awfully made into a Film. Twilight series has been made into movies, personally I think Vampire Academy deserves to be made into a film, I think more people will like it.
    Twilight fans who havent read Vampire Academy need to read the series, and trust me you will forget everything about Twilight and its lame storyline.

  1344. Posted March 3, 2010 at 1:02 am

    If you’re sick of sparkly vampires, read my novel, Cat the Vamp! It’s dark, modern, sexy, and nothing like you’ve ever read. It’s out on amazon, barnesandnoble, etc… right now or you can order it into Chapters or any other bookstore near you!

    Check me out on my publisher’s website: http://www.bylightunseenmedia.com/ctv.htm

    Have a great day!

    <3 Christina Martine

  1345. Corona Aureola
    Posted March 3, 2010 at 10:05 pm

    LOL nice job to whoever wrote this list.
    I’ve read through the comments and, quite frankly, I am appalled at the level of childishness in some of the posts. I know everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but this is meant to be humorous. The reason why a lot of people hate Twilight is because of the fans! And I completely agree with VampireAcademyIsWayMoreBetterthanTwilight: Lord of the Rings, and, to a lesser extent, Harry Potter are literary masterpieces because they are timeless and very well-written. If Twilight cannot even be bothered to correct simple things like grammar, well it will never be considered a classic.

  1346. anji
    Posted March 3, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    please stop comparing twilight to masterpieces like Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings. twilight’s only popular right now because of the crazy fangirls, and once the movies are over, it will die out. thank goodness.
    harry potter forever <3

  1347. The Meganator
    Posted March 5, 2010 at 12:43 am

    I totally agree with you on #85, only by my standards, she writes the way I did when I was 9.

  1348. Cara
    Posted March 5, 2010 at 7:56 pm

    OMG! I agree with everything you said if I knew you I would give you a high-five for every comment. My best friend and everyone else that I know are totally OBSESSED with those stupid books, I HATE THEM SO MUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you want a decent vampire book (where the so called “Vampires” (Fako ones at that) do not sparkle try vampire diaries or better yet forget about the whole vampire concept). These “Great works of American literature make people crazy obsessed. It was bad enough when people read those awful books more than once, but now people are wearing t-shirts with the definition of what a vampire is on it! I used to love the concept of vampires when I was 5. They are awesme yeah but they are just humans who died and came back alive. I bet they could live amongst the humans and no one would know. Yet again I HATE these dreaded books and one last time: WHO FRICKEN SPARKLES AND EDWARD MAKES ME VOMIT WHEN I SEE HIS FACE, PLUS THEY ONLY “LOVE” EACH OTHER BECAUSE SHE THINKS HE IS FINELY TONED, AND HE THINKS SHE SMELLS GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  1349. Cara
    Posted March 5, 2010 at 7:57 pm

    OMG! I agree with everything you said if I knew you I would give you a high-five for every comment. My best friend and everyone else that I know are totally OBSESSED with those stupid books, I HATE THEM SO MUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you want a decent vampire book (where the so called \”Vampires\” (Fako ones at that) do not sparkle try vampire diaries or better yet forget about the whole vampire concept). These \”Great works of American literature make people crazy obsessed. It was bad enough when people read those awful books more than once, but now people are wearing t-shirts with the definition of what a vampire is on it! I used to love the concept of vampires when I was 5. They are awesme yeah but they are just humans who died and came back alive. I bet they could live amongst the humans and no one would know. Yet again I HATE these dreaded books and one last time: WHO FRICKEN SPARKLES AND EDWARD MAKES ME VOMIT WHEN I SEE HIS FACE, PLUS THEY ONLY \”LOVE\” EACH OTHER BECAUSE SHE THINKS HE IS FINELY TONED, AND HE THINKS SHE SMELLS GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  1350. Cara
    Posted March 5, 2010 at 8:17 pm

    And I am only 11

  1351. Cara
    Posted March 5, 2010 at 8:24 pm

    Some people love it no offense if you do I just have major problems with that book and I did read it but nary liked it! sorry

  1352. Eyebrows Are Raised
    Posted March 7, 2010 at 6:35 pm

    Dude, who the hell sparkles unless they bought some of the crap in the store? Did he steal some from Bella’s locker? My neihbor is obsessed with this and made me watch the movie with her. I laughed at the part where the vamp traps her with the recording of her mom’s voice and hse totally bawled like an infant. I laughed harder.

    High-5 to all the comments, even if some were repeats.

    Straight men sparkle? Damn.

  1353. A Girl who actually dislikes Twilight
    Posted March 9, 2010 at 10:05 pm

    Vampires suck, Humans Rock, lol

    People (Obsessed Twilight fans, mainly Girls) need to realise Vampires don’t exist and Edward is not real, and Bella is a thorn that was created in a book by a really bad Writer.

  1354. argh
    Posted March 10, 2010 at 7:42 am

    Ok, a brief introduction, I’m a 14 year old highschooler who loves reading and wanted to see what the hype was about (so I have read all 4 books)

    Argh, I’m so sick of the comment “At least it’s getting people who don’t normally read into reading”

    This book is setting up terrible examples for females, such as:

    - Throw away your life for your highschool boyfriend. Don’t worry- you’ll have a fairytale ending.

    -Don’t worry about VCE, that’s not important in the slightest.

    - Un-protected sex is okay, you’ll end up with a beautiful baby girl who can communicate with you perfectly from birth. Oh an of course you’ll get your pre-baby figure back instantly.

    - Forget your family and friends when you get a boyfriend, he’s the most important thing.

    The characters are just made to conviently fit the plot, such as how Charlie never checks up on Bella and doesn’t really mind that she turns into something thats not human. Bella’s mother is never called on for support or friendship. The books are full of Edwards family and friends/enemies but Bella doesn’t even have any friends worth keeping in contact with from before she moved. The group of Jessica, Angela, Mike etc were extremely friendly on Bella’s first day- unrealistically though, yet she has no problem ditching them on numerous occasions.

    There are NO unpretictable plot twists. None. No character flaws when there should have been and Bella has no original thoughts although the book makes out like she is so unique.

    The crazy fan girls are driving me crazy! Here’s a quote from the website “MLIT- My Life Is Twilight”
    – Today I put glitter on my boyfriend and made him stand in the freezer section at work so he could be more like Edward.

    I find that sad. If you think that’s normal then your view is mucked up. I seriously hope it was a joke.

  1355. argh
    Posted March 10, 2010 at 8:04 am

    Another comment, when you put down the last book the thoughts are, What the hell is going to be Edwards new hobby now he can’t look out for Bella all day and night?

  1356. Laura
    Posted March 11, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    Haha nice post. For me, Twilight goes against everything I believe about love. Love isnt something that exists only between couples, and Twilight strongly implies this is the only type of love that matters. She is willing to give up her family and friends to evade death? I’ve seen how boys can change girls, it has happened with my own friends. Twilight encourages this, it encourages relying solely on boyfriends and abandoning all other relationships. One word. Unhealthy.

  1357. Ashlee
    Posted March 11, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    I agree with one person on this entire comment strip, and that is Julie.

    “Julie
    Posted March 29, 2009 at 12:51 am”

    And out of every opinion, fact, or screech I’ve heard about Twilight, I think #53 is the truest of them all.

    Quite honestly, I think Meyer would have been much better off writing Twilight and leaving it at that. New Moon, Eclipse, and Breaking Dawn were all needlessly written. Twilight didn’t exactly leave open any room for a sequel at the end, and I think it smoothed out rather nicely. Alas, she took it too far, just like Twilight lovers and haters are taking their precious opinion wars too far.

    Once again, you go, OP, for #53.

  1358. M the Gate
    Posted March 12, 2010 at 4:59 am

    Twilight is gay. ”nuff said!

    At writing camp (where the authors agreed that Twilight is the worst book seires ever), three guys made up another five reasons:

    1. Bella has no feminist side. I wish she would just kick Edward in the balls and tell him to go bite a cow (in other words herself)
    2. Reason 53
    3. WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO CLASSICAL VAMPIRES WITH FANGS AND CAPES (and snakes, er, stakes!)
    4. Vampires don’t sparkle. I’m sorry but they don’t.
    5.Edward is a freaking STALKER!!!!!!!! He watches Bella SLEEP for god’s sake!

    Twilight fans should go do something productive with their lives, and maybe read some good literature while they’re at it, for example Harry Potter or the Percy Jackson series. These are actually good books, and what’s more, the vampires in them don’t sparkle! -_-;;

    Over and out,

    M the Gate
    May
    Drew

  1359. Whatserface
    Posted March 12, 2010 at 5:08 am

    If I see another girl with a shirt that has a reference to Twilight, I am going to SCREAM! I’m seriously going to!

    People should get better fandoms. This may sound realkly nerdy, but it’s true! Personally, I like Harry Potter, Percy Jackson, The Chronicals of Narnia etc, as well as pokemon. These are all 100% better than Twilight. Bella is better off dead and Edward… well, I’d gladly send him to hell to boil in acid while he listens to opera music XD!

    Now, I’m sure Ms. Myer is a very nice lady, but she what she has written is an insult to all us writers.

    TTFN, fellow Twilight haters! =D

    PS. My friend said that she started to read Twilight and then got bored and stopped after a few chapters. This says a lot.

  1360. Anna
    Posted March 13, 2010 at 2:57 am

    I loved your list! It made me laugh hysterically!
    I read Twilight when it first came out. I didn’t mind it until EVERY GIRL in my high school started to obsess about Edward. Their obsession with it made me mad and hate the book. What happened to the good vampire books like Anne Rice’s Vampire Chronicles? Bloodline by Kate Cary? Sunshine by Robin McKinley? Dracula by Bram Stoker? Everyone seems to have forgotten about these amazing writers, especially Stoker’s Dracula! I doubt Twilight fans even knows how the concept of vampires started.
    It’s a shame really.
    Edward is an obsessive, moody stalker (if I knew him, I would have a restraining order against him). Bella is just… unhealthy. She has some major psychological problems to deal with.
    Teenage girls have a weird thinking process in which if they’re not with their boyfriends, it’s the end of the world. I feel like it’s promoting that and to put it bluntly, it’s not healthy. And this is coming from a teenager, which is saying something.
    If only people knew how thrilling and captivating good writing can be…
    But kudos on Meyers for making so much money on the naive minds of teenage girls (and some moms…).

  1361. Tiffanie
    Posted March 13, 2010 at 4:38 am

    I agree that the Twilight series is over-rated, but most of your reasons are beyond stupid and childish lol.
    As long as the readers enjoy the book, what’s the problem? Even YOU couldn’t stop reading the series. You’ve got to give Stephanie props for making her haters actually continue reading her books after they say they can’t stand them.(;
    Ability to hook the readers. That’s talent.

  1362. Robert
    Posted March 15, 2010 at 1:22 am

    Twilight fans are retarded thinking that they have “cool vampire powers” when reading the whole *******book. Sooooo dumb. They’re too obsessed with the ******* book.

  1363. Rebecca
    Posted March 15, 2010 at 7:42 pm

    Harry Potter would Avada Kadava the life right out of Mr. Sparkles!!!

  1364. Denvry
    Posted March 16, 2010 at 6:49 pm

    Ah, so true. Though I feel a few of your points are invalid, I won’t mention them because once I saw the bit on T-Pain I realized this was a joke. xD /fails

    Anyway, I agree with the Anne Rice part. Or Bram Stroker’s Dracula, too. I’m currently reading the Anne Rice series, though, and it’s a HELL OF A lot better than Twilight.

    Lestat totally pwns Edward.

  1365. faddory
    Posted March 17, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    if you are going to condemn a book because it is anti-feminist (which twilight is, because Bella is a sad example of a heroine) then please do not say that the book is not good because men dont like it. or, for that matter, say that straight men dont sparkle, lets not be homo-negitive.

  1366. Dane
    Posted March 18, 2010 at 1:49 am

    I have read and enjoyed many of the classics in modern literature and have managed to read Twilight in my spare time. In no way do I compare it to the classics, but I found it to be a very well written and captivating novel. People like you, who sit there and waste their time criticizing it, usually havent even read the book. It is much more meaningful than it seems on the surface.

  1367. Jonesy
    Posted March 18, 2010 at 6:08 am

    Lol Twilight is so lame. It is a butchery of all good literature everywhere and Twilight fans are all a little bit crazy. People say it’s just cos they are jealous of Twilight’s success. No. There are plenty of lame successes out there that I am okay with. I am not okay, however, with a lame representation of vampires. Now if I say I like vampires, people assume I mean the sparkly fairy kind, if I say I like the twilight, they’ll think I mean the lame ass books/movies. Bella is a lame wad who sends female equality back so far she’s only clumsy from the whip lash. And vampire baseball? Why not have them scrapbooking and doing each other’s hair in the next book? Maybe a Tupperware party?

  1368. Cyril
    Posted March 18, 2010 at 8:38 am

    Jamie, *So,
    *you’re
    *and so
    *everyone WHO hates

    and you have proven, like any other Twilight reader, that your opinion is invalid, as you cannot read, you are grammatically deficient, and you haven’t graduated 5th grade.

  1369. Lord Xenu
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    You\’re mostly right, but I didn\’t read the whole thing. I\’d like to point out though that Bella didn\’t commit suicide, she was trying to cliff dive. And it ended up being disastrous.

  1370. meezer
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:00 pm

    i hate twilight with a passion of a thousand suns. bravo to anyone else smart enough to agree.

  1371. JAMIE
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 9:17 pm

    So just because I dont have perfect grammer I have not passed 5th grade? Why because Im a 10th grader that loves twilight not just an immature old bitch like most of you?

  1372. Posted March 20, 2010 at 10:09 pm

    I actually have seen the quotes in #’s 62 and 63 before. And heard them. I hate Twilight so much that I actually raided 14 bookstores for Twilight, burned the books, and GOT AWAY WITH ALL 14 TIMES. One and a quarter summer vacations were spent doing that, good times… My buddy even planted a ransom note under a Twitard’s doormat a week ago when he stole her entire Twilight collection (97 Twilight DVD’s [THE SAME MOVIE} and 62 copies each of all 4 books. He got put under house arrest =(

  1373. Some Random Person
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 12:53 am

    Okay, Twilight fans are entitled to their feelings and opinions just like normal people. They are also entitled to institute the sodomizing of themselves preferably with barbed wire. Wow, that is dark, I apologize. I gotta hand it to Meyer for exploiting the feelings of the simple minded. Now if only she had the setting of the story in the middle east and Bella and Edward were U.S. Marines, then maybe, just maybe, these Twilight fans might be of some use to the world.

    So, to sum it all up, I say down with Twilight and the Disney Channel… Unless of course, we send their fans to war. Wow, I sure do have a lot of free time on my hands hating and discriminating… Don’t hate, discriminate… Don’t discriminate, Annihilate!!

  1374. Trin
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 11:46 am

    I am extremely amused. Not only with this list, but with the flame war going on beneath it. :’D You people really should just chillax. I mean, a lot of you are saying stuff like “HEY IF TWILIGHT WAS SO BAD, WHY ARE YOU SPENDING THE TIME TO BASH IT?”

    If this topic was so bad why are YOU spending the time to bash it? Really. :’D;;

    Personally, I’m an ex-twilight fan myself. I was never …Cullenistic about it, nor did I ever wish to find my own Edward.

    In fact, I preferred Mike. >: He was cute, nice, ACTUALLY HAD A JOB, and not a supernatural monster that Bella almost died a handful of times over. What.
    I don’t know what’s wrong with that, really. :’D I think it would have been an awesome plot twist if she ended up with him. -SHOT-

    Also:
    Jakeward? Yesplz.

  1375. Posted March 21, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    Oh my god…seriously? I can’t believe so many people are still debating over this. It’s a fictional book.

    It’s not worth getting upset over either way, although I believe the supporters of the book have more grounds. They enjoy it because it appeals to them. The rest of the world needs to get over it and stop hating it just because it violates some untold law in their mind of good literature or what vampires are supposed to be. The fanatics may be crazy over the series, but I’ve seen this happen with every popular subject. It’s not just Twilight. People just need to leave it alone and let it be what it is. It’s a book/movie. Some will enjoy it. Some won’t. The end.

  1376. Posted March 21, 2010 at 10:27 pm

    Aaron:

    And it’ll continue to happen with every popular subject. You just seem to be on neutral ground. Okay, great. Fine. But if people feel strongly enough about something – regardless of if they like it or hate it – they’re going to talk about it. Sure, hating Twilight just gives it more publicity and stuff, but that’s not that point. It gets our opinions out there. And it’s all fine and dandy that the book actually appeals to those who like it, but there’re people out there that are scary-obsessed. Examples: mylifeistwilight.com. Or, twilightmoms.com. This is rather frightening.

    Just ’cause you think that people need to get over it, doesn’t mean they will. And the supporters don’t necessarily have more grounds. A lot of us “haters” have read the series and we just don’t like it. With good reason. I personally have plenty of valid points on why I hate Twilight.

  1377. Emma
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 8:01 pm

    As much as I loathe Twilight I have to say your list kinda sucks. It’s padded to Stephanie-Myersesque proportions.

  1378. Kemikoaka
    Posted March 24, 2010 at 8:33 pm

    (lol I am beginning to think light yagami isn’t so bad after all) I love this list and I hate Twilight. I’m amazed you could read all the books because I had to stop halfway through the second book. It was just too terrible.

  1379. Nicci Severight
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 1:19 am

    LOL, if you decide to add onto the list you should add “Why didn’t Robert Pattinson receive more lines in Harry Potter? Twilight.” Such a terrible fuxxin actor…

  1380. Anonymous
    Posted March 27, 2010 at 10:15 pm

    This whole list is made of win. (:
    The Death Note and Harry Potter references especially made my day, seeing as I’m obsessed with both. XD

    Twitards, chill. The books aren’t completely dreadful, but they certainly don’t deserve to be as popular as they are, and that’s why people like myself are so averse to them.

    So don’t bash people for stating their opinions.

  1381. Allison
    Posted March 31, 2010 at 9:11 am

    I remember I read the Twilight books just because everyone else did, but then I realized the whole dumb series is dumb. All of these reasons are correct. Twilight is influencing people in all the wrong ways. Geez, I don’t see Dracula getting all shiny when he walks out into the sun. Stephenie Meyer made a up a whole new set of vampire rules, which were not meant to be broken.

  1382. Quinn
    Posted April 2, 2010 at 11:54 pm

    I tired Twilight for a Friend it really didn’t Go away where and Harry Potter is why better.

  1383. CelticNarnianPotter
    Posted April 2, 2010 at 11:59 pm

    meezer I agree with you I tired it and it wasn’t my favorite.

  1384. Cindy
    Posted April 4, 2010 at 12:34 am

    I don’t really mind Twilight or any of the other books in the series but I do have to agree that it is really overrated.
    Popularity can drive an author to improve his or her work or bloat his or her ego. In this case, I would say that the popularity of Twilight has pretty much blown up Mrs. Meyer’s ego out of proportion. This pretty much explains why the first book in the series was the best and why the other books are just crap that never ends.
    The books do have quite a few grammar mistakes. While doesn’t seem to be much of an issue to some other people, I would have to disagree. Some people say that at least Twilight is exposing teens to literature, I say, what USE is exposing teens to literature if the said literature can’t even follow grammar rules? People learn by example, and by showing people a bad example of grammar, they themselves will start using BAD grammar.
    To be honest here, I’m really sick of all these “extreme” romances. Forbidden love, cursed love, the list never seems to end. I miss the old “boy meets girl” NORMAL romances. Real life situations that will teach girls the real face of love. Not every guy is a prince charming and not everyone will be able to find their perfect person. All this fuss over Twilight makes me wonder if a realistic and normal romance is even possible now.

  1385. boo
    Posted April 4, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    I hate twilight. I hate the super whiny Bella. I hate the abusive Edward. I hate the fact that vampires are stripped of their vampireness. :D They sparkle? They have yellow and red eyes? They don’t have fangs? They are so darn beautiful, and smell sooso good? -,- I HATE TWILIGHT

  1386. Posted April 5, 2010 at 1:30 am

    YES! I thought I was the only one who could see that Edward is a pedophile! A friend recommended the movie, she said she loved the books. So I was on a long haul flight and the only thing left on the movie system that I hadn’t seen was Twilight. So I caved and watched it.

    I wasn’t really getting into the movie, because well, I’m an adult and it’s geared toward teenagers. And I especially couldn’t get behind it when I worked out the age difference between Bella and Edward.

    All I kept thinking was “she’s 16, he’s 117, WTF!?”. How in the world could he ever have anything in common with her to discuss? And how in the world could he find her attractive, she’s a child?!

    And I couldn’t believe that no one noticed what I did…he’s a pedophile.

  1387. Um...Baa.
    Posted April 6, 2010 at 5:11 pm

    I found 65 rather amusing. And completely true, actually. I sometimes wish Bella would actually THINK about things. She sent Edward off to try and get Jacob to come back in Eclipse without even asking if he was ok. It’s also annoying how she leads Jacob on and then just makes him upset by running away. But apart from that, I um…like it :S

  1388. Helen
    Posted April 8, 2010 at 4:38 pm

    i am a Twilight fan. when i say twilight, i mean the BOOK not the movie. i read the book ages before it became a movie. and i think that you are right in a lot of ways because twilight was enjoyable the first time i read it but now, after the movie, i see the flaws and if im honest it doesnt really apepal to me anymore. i will always like it, but when i see twilight fans now and i’m embarassed that i was ever like that. liking a book is fine and good but the obsession of some fans is just scary. Thanks for voicing your opinion of Twilight. some of your points were a bit petty, but most were true and i found myself laughing and saying “i always wondered about that too!”. yeah, so twilight is good, but wait till the movies are over and people find a new obsession.

  1389. ninny
    Posted April 8, 2010 at 4:45 pm

    i completely agree. we should roast edward over a fire in broad daylight. sparkle, man, sparkle!!!! mwahahahaha

  1390. Brittany
    Posted April 9, 2010 at 12:06 am

    My main problem regarding Twilight is, of course, Bella. Why the main female character has to be a depressed-dependent-whiny-selfish brat that has no talent ambition or purpose on life other than to be in love with Edward is beyond me. Other than this I regarded the books as slightly better than terrible until Breaking Dawn. WTF. They spent like 200 pages getting reading for a battle THAT DIDN’T HAPPEN!
    So thank you, whoever you are, for this list. It helped heal the emotional pain caused by finishing this series.

  1391. maria
    Posted April 10, 2010 at 1:23 am

    i read the bok, cuz my friends read it in a ” this sounds stupid” book clyub, lol were we read books and make fun of them. my fav ones were 48, 45, 65, 66, 74, 82, and 93! good job!

  1392. Keri
    Posted April 11, 2010 at 4:32 am

    I thought I was crazy and was the only one who felt this way.
    I make fun of Twilight all the time, but I figured I was being a hypocrite b/c I have never read the books or seen the movie.
    I could not get through the first book at all. I have now borrowed the audio books from a friend and am half way through “New Moon” and I still hate Bella.
    I keep waiting to hear why these stories are so great, but I just end up wishing Eric from True Blood will show up and break her neck.
    In the mean time, I am listening to the books and editing them for the author in my head.
    I just don’t get it.

  1393. kiki
    Posted April 12, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    I sort of agree with you on some points, that is to say at least half of them were completely nonsensical and downright lame. Things like “It’s stupid” or “’cause it’s dumb” don’t exactly make a great point. Still, it is absolutely true that every other word in the book is a fancy (and completely pointless) adjective used in order to make the readers (mostly 12-year-old girls) believe that it was written by a theoretical physicist-turned-author instead of a woman with acess to a dictionary. It is also true that Meyer introduces a whole lot of interesting characters (at least more interesting than either Bella or Edward) and does nothing with them, more so on the last book Breaking Dawn, where like a hundred of those “super” vampires (they are already vampires,why make them “super”?) appear out of nowhere, all with apparently fascinating backstories that we never got to read about becasue the whole story focuses on Bella developing her own (lame) super powers in order to protect her mutant offspring. Of course in the end nothing happens (like in all four books) and everyone goes home, leaving us with nothing but a bunch of unresolved plot lines and the horrible image of Jacob having sex with Renesmee in a near future.

    No, Twilight is not the worst book ever written, but it is also, in my opinion, completely undeserving of it’s popularity. While the first book was okay and entertaining, it was increadibly frustrating for me at least to see how the rest kept getting worse and worse.

  1394. Cindy
    Posted April 12, 2010 at 10:04 pm

    Thank you for being a sane person and realizing that there is no way Twilight could ever possibly begin to compare to Harry Potter.

  1395. Rachel
    Posted April 12, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    I have to agree with you that Meyer used a lot of pointless adjectives just so she could feel smart. I also agree that Twilight has led the world to believe that it’s okay to be a wimp and lose all meaning in your life the second your boyfriend dumps you.

  1396. Spellbound4
    Posted April 13, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    You clearly don’t no the first thing about Twilight, considering you have wrote a bunch of stuff that is completely wrong.

    Lets start with your point 1-
    Excuse me Bella is NOT a MarySue. Infact Bella is the complete oposite. How can Meyer disguise it with her being clumsy? Excuse me have you even heard yourself?! Bella is not a MarySue.

    You claim Edward has no flaws. You cleary have no idea. God you are so thick to write this when you have no idea.
    Edward does have flaws. If you actually paid attention you’d no that Edward actually is fighting hard not to suck Bella’s blood. He is addicted to her by that. He is over protective and as he actually says himself, Bella is better with Jacob.

    Your point 59. If you new the facts you were writing about you’d no that months pass by, by that time!

    HAVE YOU EVEN HEARD YOURSELF YOU STUPID FREAK!?
    Go back and read those pointers. Theres far to many that mean absoloultly nothing and prove nothing for twilight being bad.

    God your a total idiot. At least people like me can sense your stupidity. You cleary have no idea about Twilight.
    Oh by the way dimbo the reason its called the twilight saga is beacuse the first book is called twilight…duh! What are you, plain stupid??? Well i certainly no the answer to that question.
    do you really have nothing better to do with your life then to write a load of meaningless points on why Twilight is bad?

    Three words for you- get a life

  1397. Posted April 13, 2010 at 11:21 pm

    I think the fans are the worst part….although that might be because my last name is Cullen. Someone once said to me “OMG wouldn’t it be like awesome if you were related to them!” :|

  1398. Posted April 14, 2010 at 12:40 am

    This book is so stupid and I abhor the fact that it is worshiped by every teen. The writing is awful and I agree with every single flaw that you have posted on your list!

  1399. Andrews
    Posted April 14, 2010 at 9:31 am

    THIS IS SO AWESOMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

  1400. Connie D.
    Posted April 15, 2010 at 10:34 am

    Hallelujah! Somebody else who sees how immature and boring this series is! I read “Twilight” and thought, “If something doesn’t happen pretty soon, I’m going to throw this thing against the wall!” Plus, the whole background story is completely unbelieveable. The character of Bella is whiny, selfish, immature, and boring. Would a man as old as Edward really fall in love with someone like that? Is the author saying that he still thinks like a teenager just because he still looks like one? Hasn’t he gained any maturity in the past 100 years?

  1401. Mytwocents
    Posted April 17, 2010 at 12:08 pm

    Okay, so I’ll start off by saying that I read all of the books and have seen the two movies. The movies are crap and the books are way better but when your comparing it to crap it doesn’t make the books magnificent it makes them okay at best. So, everything I’m about to say is based on the fact that I know everything that the typical “Twihard” knows. I would also like to say that anyone who has the passion to follow a dream, even if it doesn’t amount to much, scores points with me. Is Stephenie Meyer the worst writer, no there are worse. Did she have the right to tell a story, yes absolutely. Did she have the right to change the idea of vampires, again she sure did. With that being said lets get down to business.

    1. Why are people who like Twilight on a site like this? You say the person who wrote the blog has no life or doesn’t know what they are talking about yet you spend your time searching for people who hate Twilight on the internet so you can tell them how wrong they are. Wow! Now who has no life?

    Secondly, the title of the website is called, “Why I hate Twilight” if you love Twilight then you know from the title of this website that it’s going to be something you don’t want to hear. Then you get on the site and tell the author how stupid they are for their opinion but you’re the one who sought it out. How does that make you any smarter than the person who you claim to think is stupid and wasting time? There are millions of websites devoted to loving Twilight yet you chose the one out of millions that doesn’t.

    2. How can you call Twilight a forbidden romance? The author took out the reason why it’s forbidden for humans and vampires to be together. People may not like Edward and Bella’s relationship yet nobody truly opposes it, thereby eliminating the entire idea of forbidden romance.

    3. A good story has conflict the characters are supposed to grow. Edward changes nothing about himself ulimately to be with Bella and besides becoming a vampire what has Bella learned? The series starts with Bella being a mature responsible person and ends the same way. She loses nothing but doesn’t really gain anything either.

    4. I read Stephenie Meyer’s website so I read Midnight Sun. However, not everyone who has read the series has read that and Stephenie Meyer has said she won’t publish it so honestly without that there is no way to know that Edward truly has a problem with Bella’s blood. It’s not like he slips up and almost kills her or anything so you can’t use that as a reason that he is selfless or flawed.

    I didn’t want to mention the moral parts of the book because books are supposed to be for entertainment value and Stephenie Meyer succeeds in entertaining her audience. But …

    Sadly, that doesn’t take away from the fact that young girls are impressionable maybe not all are but a lot are. So, you can’t escape the fact that Bella is the perfect damsel in distress. She doesn’t handle anything on her own and she does give off the impression that men are the answer for all a woman’s problems. She is obsessed with Edward. So much so, that even though she knows that Demetri can’t track her because of her shield she’s willing to leave her totally trackable daughter in the hands of a totally trackable shape shifting werewolf so she can die with Edward. Ultimately, leaving the child she fought so hard for an orphan when she herself would have had a better chance of surviving with Renesmee. Yes, she hoped they would kill Demetri but she didn’t know if they would. If nothing else that’s bad parenting.

    I think that the reason people thought Alice and Jasper had more potential was because they have conflict built into their character history. Think about it, Alice has no memories of being human there are so many things that could be done with that story line. Then you have Jasper who for a good part of his life hunted humans and is now struggling to live as a good “vegetarian” vampire. There’s just a lot that can be done with those characters. But the story isn’t about them and the main characters, it is about, have no conflict. Of course people would gravitate towards the most conflict riddled charaters.

    Stephenie Meyer wanted to write a simple romance with a twist and she did. Is it executed properly? Not at all, but it is a pretty great idea in theory.

    I’m so tired of all the people that said that the list contradicts itself by saying Eward is perfect and flawless then lists his flaws. The person who wrote the list is talking about what they personally believe to be flaws for Edward. But, if you take the story from Bella’s point of view, which is the way it’s written, he is perfect. People who say Edward is flawed are going off of an unpublished idea of Edward through his own point-of-view in Midnight Sun. You don’t even figure out that he is jealous or any of that until you read Midnight Sun. In Eclipse he mentions to Jacob in the tent that he is jealous but again you have to consider that the story is told from Bella’s point-of-view and Bella believes she’s dreaming which shows even more that he is perfect.

    Bella is not a good role model for any girl to look up to; she had no real goals to begin with, makes no attempt at making real connections with anyone of her species, makes Eward the center of her life and gets everything she wants. Edward is not the type of guy boys should desire to become first he stalks the the girl he wants to be with, gives her mixed signals when she shows interest in him and then constantly treats her like she’s beneath him. Jacob is a guy who forced himself on someone he considered to be his best friend then continues to invade her space by taking her home and gloating about the fact that he basically date raped her and her dad is cool with it. None of these characters are shining examples of how a person should act, but that’s why they’re characters in a book and not real people. But, will girls project these ideas of what they have read is acceptable behavior on real life? Absolutely, and that’s why people need to voice a different opinion because some girls do get the lines between reality and fantasy confused.

    5. Also I hate when people say that Bella sacrifices. What did Bella sacrifice? Yes, she tried to do some stuff but none of it happens and she thought she would be sacrifices by choosing to become a vampire but she doesn’t so there was no loss for Bella.

    I hate to admit it but the books are totally plotless. There about a girl who falls in love with a guy that’s (kind of) a vampire. You can’t really say that is a strong enough hook for a series of books when you don’t have the vampires be anything like people know them to be. If you take away the element that makes vampire and human relationships difficult you’re left with a clumsy girl that falls in love with a loner rich guy.

    There is no story there because it is conflictless and when conflict arises it all magically works out. No lessons are learned and no one suffers for too long, if at all. You can’t kill off characters who had no real development and expect that to be conflict enough to last four books. Then introduce a threatening/antagonistic force that isn’t all that threatening then end it by saying they lived happily ever after. They didn’t start unhappyily. Nobody was better or worse because of any of the events in any of the books.

    I’m not going to burn my books because of this site but I’m also realistic enough to know that the books aren’t the best literature ever written. They are a collection of books written to entertain and serve as wish fulfillment for those who need some conflictless romance.

    The End

  1402. Mytwocents
    Posted April 17, 2010 at 12:08 pm

    Okay, so I\’ll start off by saying that I read all of the books and have seen the two movies. The movies are crap and the books are way better but when your comparing it to crap it doesn\’t make the books magnificent it makes them okay at best. So, everything I\’m about to say is based on the fact that I know everything that the typical \”Twihard\” knows. I would also like to say that anyone who has the passion to follow a dream, even if it doesn\’t amount to much, scores points with me. Is Stephenie Meyer the worst writer, no there are worse. Did she have the right to tell a story, yes absolutely. Did she have the right to change the idea of vampires, again she sure did. With that being said lets get down to business.

    1. Why are people who like Twilight on a site like this? You say the person who wrote the blog has no life or doesn\’t know what they are talking about yet you spend your time searching for people who hate Twilight on the internet so you can tell them how wrong they are. Wow! Now who has no life?

    Secondly, the title of the website is called, \”Why I hate Twilight\” if you love Twilight then you know from the title of this website that it\’s going to be something you don\’t want to hear. Then you get on the site and tell the author how stupid they are for their opinion but you\’re the one who sought it out. How does that make you any smarter than the person who you claim to think is stupid and wasting time? There are millions of websites devoted to loving Twilight yet you chose the one out of millions that doesn\’t.

    2. How can you call Twilight a forbidden romance? The author took out the reason why it\’s forbidden for humans and vampires to be together. People may not like Edward and Bella\’s relationship yet nobody truly opposes it, thereby eliminating the entire idea of forbidden romance.

    3. A good story has conflict the characters are supposed to grow. Edward changes nothing about himself ulimately to be with Bella and besides becoming a vampire what has Bella learned? The series starts with Bella being a mature responsible person and ends the same way. She loses nothing but doesn\’t really gain anything either.

    4. I read Stephenie Meyer\’s website so I read Midnight Sun. However, not everyone who has read the series has read that and Stephenie Meyer has said she won\’t publish it so honestly without that there is no way to know that Edward truly has a problem with Bella\’s blood. It\’s not like he slips up and almost kills her or anything so you can\’t use that as a reason that he is selfless or flawed.

    I didn\’t want to mention the moral parts of the book because books are supposed to be for entertainment value and Stephenie Meyer succeeds in entertaining her audience. But …

    Sadly, that doesn\’t take away from the fact that young girls are impressionable maybe not all are but a lot are. So, you can\’t escape the fact that Bella is the perfect damsel in distress. She doesn\’t handle anything on her own and she does give off the impression that men are the answer for all a woman\’s problems. She is obsessed with Edward. So much so, that even though she knows that Demetri can\’t track her because of her shield she\’s willing to leave her totally trackable daughter in the hands of a totally trackable shape shifting werewolf so she can die with Edward. Ultimately, leaving the child she fought so hard for an orphan when she herself would have had a better chance of surviving with Renesmee. Yes, she hoped they would kill Demetri but she didn\’t know if they would. If nothing else that\’s bad parenting.

    I think that the reason people thought Alice and Jasper had more potential was because they have conflict built into their character history. Think about it, Alice has no memories of being human there are so many things that could be done with that story line. Then you have Jasper who for a good part of his life hunted humans and is now struggling to live as a good \”vegetarian\” vampire. There\’s just a lot that can be done with those characters. But the story isn\’t about them and the main characters, it is about, have no conflict. Of course people would gravitate towards the most conflict riddled charaters.

    Stephenie Meyer wanted to write a simple romance with a twist and she did. Is it executed properly? Not at all, but it is a pretty great idea in theory.

    I\’m so tired of all the people that said that the list contradicts itself by saying Eward is perfect and flawless then lists his flaws. The person who wrote the list is talking about what they personally believe to be flaws for Edward. But, if you take the story from Bella\’s point of view, which is the way it\’s written, he is perfect. People who say Edward is flawed are going off of an unpublished idea of Edward through his own point-of-view in Midnight Sun. You don\’t even figure out that he is jealous or any of that until you read Midnight Sun. In Eclipse he mentions to Jacob in the tent that he is jealous but again you have to consider that the story is told from Bella\’s point-of-view and Bella believes she\’s dreaming which shows even more that he is perfect.

    Bella is not a good role model for any girl to look up to; she had no real goals to begin with, makes no attempt at making real connections with anyone of her species, makes Eward the center of her life and gets everything she wants. Edward is not the type of guy boys should desire to become first he stalks the the girl he wants to be with, gives her mixed signals when she shows interest in him and then constantly treats her like she\’s beneath him. Jacob is a guy who forced himself on someone he considered to be his best friend then continues to invade her space by taking her home and gloating about the fact that he basically date raped her and her dad is cool with it. None of these characters are shining examples of how a person should act, but that\’s why they\’re characters in a book and not real people. But, will girls project these ideas of what they have read is acceptable behavior on real life? Absolutely, and that\’s why people need to voice a different opinion because some girls do get the lines between reality and fantasy confused.

    5. Also I hate when people say that Bella sacrifices. What did Bella sacrifice? Yes, she tried to do some stuff but none of it happens and she thought she would be sacrifices by choosing to become a vampire but she doesn\’t so there was no loss for Bella.

    I hate to admit it but the books are totally plotless. There about a girl who falls in love with a guy that\’s (kind of) a vampire. You can\’t really say that is a strong enough hook for a series of books when you don\’t have the vampires be anything like people know them to be. If you take away the element that makes vampire and human relationships difficult you\’re left with a clumsy girl that falls in love with a loner rich guy.

    There is no story there because it is conflictless and when conflict arises it all magically works out. No lessons are learned and no one suffers for too long, if at all. You can\’t kill off characters who had no real development and expect that to be conflict enough to last four books. Then introduce a threatening/antagonistic force that isn\’t all that threatening then end it by saying they lived happily ever after. They didn\’t start unhappyily. Nobody was better or worse because of any of the events in any of the books.

    I\’m not going to burn my books because of this site but I\’m also realistic enough to know that the books aren\’t the best literature ever written. They are a collection of books written to entertain and serve as wish fulfillment for those who need some conflictless romance.

    The End

  1403. Kristin
    Posted April 18, 2010 at 11:31 am

    I personally enjoyed reading the books. I suppose that if ranting, bitter bloggers spent more time writing their own books instead of bitching about the imperfect writing of others, then they wouldn’t have any reason to be so bitter and spiteful about someone else’s success. To answer the question of why someone who likes Twilight would be on a page like this, I was actually reading another article on here about freelance writing and for some reason “Why I Hate Twilight” came up as suggested reading at the bottom of the page. Having enjoyed the books, I was curious as to why someone would hate them so much that they needed to post 95 reasons (some repetitive) for doing so.

    The only thing that I will agree with is that Twilight is not better than Harry Potter. Harry Potter is obviously in a league of its own, and the character development of Severus Snape alone was a masterpiece.

    I personally don’t know how somebody can despise a book, or book series, so much and yet still manage to read all of them. If I am not enjoying a book or can’t get into it, then I normally will lose interest and stop reading it.

    Additionally, where you say it doesn’t make sense because teenagers don’t fall in love that fast, I must disagree for more than one reason. First of all, teenagers are notorious for having very strong infatuations and they believe is love, and who can deny that they will always remember their first “love”? Teenage girls everywhere can relate to Bella’s desperation to be with Edward. Meyer capitalized on something and make herself a millionaire. Good for her. At the same time, she didn’t combine this desperate teenage love with graphic sex scenes, and Bella and Edward wait until their married to do the deed. If anything, I think Meyer was attempting to stay on the moral side. I don’t think she was trying to destroy equality, and most people, particularly the target audience of the series, would take it to mean that they should brainlessly follow a dangerous man to the ends of the Earth.

    I am wondering if you’re going to next publish 95 reasons why you hate Jodi Picoult. Now that is something I can agree with. If you’re going to attack a writer, I think she’s the one to attack. Readers purchase her books, and she repays them by drawing you deep into a story and then slamming you with a bout of horror and depression at the end. Nothing is quite so terrible as the end of My Sister’s Keeper. Now there is an author whose intentions I would question.

    I am ranting just like everybody else, but I just think that Meyer had good intentions when she wrote the book, and that it was an enjoyable read. It may not be the most classic work of literature ever published, but honestly, some classic works of literature are, in fact, not very enjoyable to read. I found it easy to flow through the Twilight series without spacing out in the middle of a page, and it had a happy ending. In a nutshell, I thought it was pretty good, but as a writer myself, I would rather someday be compared to J.K. Rowling than Stephanie Meyer.

    That’s all.

  1404. Kristin
    Posted April 18, 2010 at 12:05 pm

    Cyril
    Posted March 18, 2010 at 8:38 am

    Jamie, *So,
    *you’re
    *and so
    *everyone WHO hates

    and you have proven, like any other Twilight reader, that your opinion is invalid, as you cannot read, you are grammatically deficient, and you haven’t graduated 5th grade.

    Really now, Cyril. That’s incredibly rude. I’m 25 years old, and I read and write perfectly fine. As I stated above, I read and enjoyed the Twilight books. They weren’t the greatest masterpiece ever created, but I enjoyed them.

    I really think that Twilight fans and non-fans alike would gain more respect for their cause and their opinions if they would refrain from making ignorant generalizations.

    I love how people hate things that are popular just for the sake of being different. If you want to be different, then be different. Don’t be like every other closet Twilight reader who bashes something just to appear cool and sardonic.

    If you’re really too open minded to be mainstream and too “different” to go with the flow, then stop being so insecure. Half the people that replied to this list in the last year are obviously people who will make fun of something just because they a.) don’t understand it, or b.) need to appear to be above pop culture because they truly have no identity.

    I have read every book that I’ve been able to get my hands on for my entire life, and I’ve enjoyed most of them for one reason or another. Additionally, my playlist consists of music from Britney Spears, Pink Floyd, Muse, Michael Jackson, Nirvana…etc. People are the same way about music. All of the people who have some sarcastic quip to spew about Twilight are probably the same ones who make fun of Britney Spears, but jam out to Hit Me Baby One More Time secretly in the car when no one else is around.

    Are you all really so single minded that you must despise Twilight because Harry Potter is a more developed or more involved literary work? Pink Floyd – Musical genius, their music means something “deep.” Great! But who the hell wants to be that deep ALL THE TIME?

    It is why sometimes you read Pride and Prejudice and sometimes you read Twilight. Nobody is ALWAYS in the mood to sink deeply into a literary (or musical) masterpiece. Sometimes, a guilty pleasure is just what the doctor ordered.

  1405. Ash
    Posted April 18, 2010 at 8:01 pm

    I don’t get why so many people like Twilight. I don’t know why so many are crazily in love with Edward and being a 15 year old when the hype started I was right in the middle of it but I never liked Twilight. Now I’m 17 I can’t believe that people are still going crazy over it. It’s basically been TWO years.

    People say it’s got young people reading but reading what? I’m a very wide reader and I can say that people who think Twilight is the best thing they have every read need to visit the library more often. There are hundreds of books that are better then Twilight.

    Twilight will never take Harry Potter’s place like some people seam to think. For starters Harry Potter has interesting characters, plot line and he doesn’t have girls dropping dead over him as soon as he comes to the school. This story is also more believable because of the villain. Voldemort doesn’t show up in the last quarter of the book and start hutting Harry like James does with Bella. Like all good villains Voldemort is there from the start hiding in the shadows waiting to pounce on the unsuspecting hero. Not the sudden lets bring in the random guy to add some action ploy that was used in Twilight.

    And if you want vampire fiction you can’t beat the original vampire fic Dracula by Bram Stoker or if your looking for a more resent book series then try reading The Saga of Darren Shan. Don’t watch the new movie that is based on Darren Shan because it is the worse book to movie adaptation I have ever watched.

  1406. GINGEEE_
    Posted April 19, 2010 at 7:43 pm

    I agree. Harry Potter would beat Twilight any day.
    I read about half of the first book, simply to see what my friends where so hyped up about, but had to stop because I just got so bloomin’ bored.
    JK Rowling is a legend and I think the Harry Potter series is the best set of books that I have ever read, and I’ve read a wide range of books (seriously, my bedroom could be mistaken for a library).
    To conclude Twilight is crap, and Harry Potter rocks. Thats my opinion anyway. (:

  1407. amber
    Posted April 20, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    your reasons are awesome, twilight sucks!
    the ending was lame, people should watch trueblood if they want real vampires
    and when i am saying real vampires i mean fangs and burning too ashes when meeting the sun
    and the vampires there are really HOT
    and when i say hot i mean ALEXANDER SKARSGARD
    and there is a plot and a strong woman that has powers and cant be controled by a man but she is a bit dumb…
    and there are shapeshifters too, which is awesome ’cause other than vamps and weres there are no other supernatural creatures in twilight and it suck and in the books of trueblood there are even more creatures
    to conclud: twilight sucks!!!!!!!!!!!

  1408. BANGBANG
    Posted April 20, 2010 at 5:36 pm

    I had read Twilight but I cant say Im a fan. Obviously most of you guys here read it too to care enough to comment. Well, I think most of you guys are very uptight about life, period. People like most of you guys criticize almost everything. Its non-fiction. Its a book! A movie! Why should we make books or movie so \”related\” to realistic? Wouldnt that be boring? Meyers can make vampiries however she wants. Its her book. When you decided that you want to write a book, you can write about whatever you want. Who cares if Edward sparkles in the sun? Are you hurt or angry about the making of Twilight? Does it make it hard for you to eat & sleep that you sit and come up with reasons? I actually think that you are not normal.

  1409. BANGBANG
    Posted April 20, 2010 at 5:39 pm

    I meant fiction. Lol.

  1410. Posted April 22, 2010 at 12:44 am

    How childish of you? Honestly, it’s a book series, ffs. Some people like it, some don’t. You’re probably just pissy about it because you don’t understand where she’s trying to open the mind at. I’m in psychological studies, and yes, all the teenage girls like having their fun, but one day, they are going to grow up and realise. Again, it’s just a book series and no one really enjoys someone is too absorbed in what they think of things. I mean really, 95 bogus opinions? I mean, some may be factual, but honestly, do you think that writing all of that is going to change the United States as much as Twilight did? You’re probably just some creeper still living in your mom’s house, buying random books to read because sunlight and people are out of the question for you. Get a life and stop stressing over a book. I’m not going to threaten you, obviously, I’m just proving a point that ranting about a popular book series gets you no where, and all of the people that love the book aren’t going to suddenly stop because you wrote. To be honest, i’m not too fond of the series either, but not because it isn’t creatively written or it’s cheesy, I dislike it because of the fact that everyone who same the damn movie is now reading the books, and getting nothing from the actual literature. I mean, go divulge yourself in Dracula or The Haunting of Hill House if you really want great literature. I’m not dissing, I’m not agreeing. Just grow up and find a better hobby.

  1411. nushkii
    Posted April 22, 2010 at 9:52 am

    umm excuse me but tese arent even like real reasons :/
    i mean bella can do without edward shes just heartbroken…wouldnt u be if ur bf dumped be u would be like a corpse if that happened same thing and she didnt try to commit suicide she tried jumping off cliffs to see edward u big idiot have u read harry potter its stupid!!!!! i mean wizards cmon!! grow up!!

  1412. someone
    Posted April 24, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    Twilight is so popular among teenage girls because it is a quick, easy read. No, that’s too much of an understatement. The twilight books were written at approximately a sixth grade reading level. Even airheads who don’t understand why some of us read for fun can pick it up and get into the story without too much trouble.

  1413. Light Yagami
    Posted April 24, 2010 at 1:58 pm

    I am Light Yagami and I approve this message.

  1414. massacre
    Posted April 25, 2010 at 1:32 am

    Most of the things you listed were either entirely incorrect, or proof that you entirely missed the point of some things. In my opinion, that makes you more stupid than all the “OMG! Edward Cullen is soooo hot xoxoxoxoxx ima be mrs cullen” crazed fans out there.

  1415. Twilight brainwashed girls.
    Posted April 25, 2010 at 10:56 pm

    BTW, Why is Bella in love with an old man?? She\’s actually in love with a pale, old dead man. ;)

  1416. Fart in A Jar
    Posted April 25, 2010 at 11:12 pm

    The next time I go to confirmation, I’m going to tell the priest to forgive for reading and watching twilight. x_x

  1417. Zachary Q.
    Posted April 25, 2010 at 11:13 pm

    Honeslty, I don\’t think its a great book…

  1418. jasus
    Posted April 26, 2010 at 1:45 am

    ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

    i just read your list (funny as hell), never read the books/seen the movie (hopefully never will), but the funniest parts isn’t the list it is how pissed off people get when you point out the fact that they are completely enthralled by something so stupid

    keep on keepin on

  1419. jasus
    Posted April 26, 2010 at 1:48 am

    ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

    i just read your list (funny as hell), never read the books/seen the movie (hopefully never will), but the funniest parts isn\’t the list it is how pissed off people get when you point out the fact that they are completely enthralled by something so stupid

    keep on keepin on

  1420. Allen O. Nymous
    Posted April 26, 2010 at 10:35 pm

    Just a Thought… I’m pretty sure Harry Potter already DID beat Edward.

    Lucky bastard is both a vampire and a zombie because freaking voldemort killed him in the graveyard.

    No. This is not from a Twilight fan, I’m just giving you the reason I was able to stumble through the first book without gouging my eyes out with a rusty spoon.

  1421. Merissa
    Posted April 29, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    Although your post has some valid points I will admit, I have to disagree on some of it. I’ve read them all numerous times and enjoyed them. I think that any human being with any literal knowledge is going to question some of the characters and plot details in the saga. Every author starts with a book and writes it for themselves according to their own fantasies and ideas, because there are no rules to what an author can write about. Stephanie Meyer can write about anything she wants just as you and I can, and if she wants to make Edward flawless, Bella helpless and dependent on men, and not follow mainstream vampire theories that’s her prerogative. I understand that with all fans there are people who will hate on everything. But the Twilight saga is popular for a reason, and why can’t people just accept that Stephanie Meyer wrote novels that appeal to many people not just teenagers? Billions of books are published with ideas others may agree or disagree with, but our minds and ideas aren’t the same we are all different. And what I may think is a strong piece of literature may be a piece of crap to you. But just because an author invents ideas that you don’t agree with, you don’t need to pick it apart and insult a person’s intelligence. The Twilight saga isn’t even close to the best books I’ve ever read, but I’ve read much worse.

  1422. janine/harrypotterluver
    Posted April 29, 2010 at 11:28 pm

    omg, this is the BEST LIST EVER. I COMPLETELY AGREE!!!!!

  1423. Julian
    Posted April 30, 2010 at 6:58 pm

    Twilight make the girls idiot.
    It’s like being anorexical or bulimic.
    Or take drugs.

    That’s it.

  1424. Julian
    Posted April 30, 2010 at 6:59 pm

    Twilight make the girls idiot.
    It\’s like being anorexical or bulimic.
    Or take drugs.

    That\’s it.

  1425. Mojojuju
    Posted May 2, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    AMEN. “Twilight” has no real description. It’s too vague. You can’t get any vivid images. For example, I still would have no real idea of what Bella looks like if it weren’t for the movies. And even then, is that what Bella was supposed to look like?

  1426. shion
    Posted May 4, 2010 at 3:54 am

    Well whatever. This really doesn’t convince me. I should hate Twilight because of these stupid reasons? Please. You’re just jealous. You should get a life. You’re no better than those crazy Twilight fan girls. They spend time drooling over Edward, and you spend time trying to have them hate Edward. You’re pathetic. You’re probably jealous because us girls would rather have a mary sue fictional character like Edward, than a pathetic loser like you. You suck. Get a life. Surely, I know Stephenie Meyer is a better person than you.

  1427. Shianne
    Posted May 4, 2010 at 8:55 am

    It was really badly written & boring. My best friends loved the books though but in my opinion all the reasons you but up are incredibly true. It was way to predictable, boring & well stupid. But my friend told me another thing: Stephenie Meyer’s makes you love Edward with how much Bella thinks about him, but after you read the books you really realize how stupid it really was.

    Most Girls like the series while there reading them, but a lot of them after they read them realize how stupid they really where.

  1428. JPeaslee
    Posted May 6, 2010 at 7:06 pm

    This is pretty good. I actually like the series, but like you said, it doesn’t live up to the hype. And all the fangirls did kind of ruin the series for me.

    Oh, the word “fangs” is used in the third book, by the way.

  1429. Ameliacharles
    Posted May 7, 2010 at 2:51 am

    okay …………..everyone has opinions.
    The point is Twilight is the kind of book that you are going to absolutely love it or absolutely hate it.
    Personally I hate it. I have read the book ( the worst hours of my life) and there is only word I would use to describe the characters in the book – SHALLOW.
    especially the protagonists. There so called love has no real emotional or underlying bonding element.
    Only characters that make any remote sense to me are Jacob black and Alice. Alice comes across as a person who one may relate to and like if they were real. and Jacob evolves through the book……………although meyers obsession turns him into a pedophile in the end.

    I think people simply love the idea of forbidden romance. this is the only reason I could come up with their crazy obsession with this book.
    Its is indeed the worst piece ever written. And I can say that because I have actually read good authors like Jane Austen, Ayn Rand, Emily Bronte and so ………..I am not a dumb moronic damsel in distress like Bella who keeps tripping over invisible things.
    I don’t usually judge people and I’m quite considerate ( mostly )never to offend someone’s choices ………but I have to make exception in case people are comparing this series with harry potter………………….guys grow up!!!! and learn to read for Christ sake………..
    Harry potter is on whole another level…………..it may be a fantasy fiction but it has intricate plot, characters that have depth and who have evolved with time. they have grown up with its readers and its not a one tracked story.
    Twilight may be a good read for some hormone controlled teenager but one has to admit its badly written, predictable, boring, annoying to a level of irritation………………It is a crime to compare the two series…………

  1430. :D
    Posted May 7, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    I love you. Enough said.

  1431. L
    Posted May 10, 2010 at 5:03 am

    Great list etc. i got half way through the first book before i put it down never picked it up again due the laughing at the ridiculousness of the story and lack of story line. its highly predictable cliche and vague and can someone please tell me WHY VAMPIRES ARE SPARKLING?! it doesnt make sense and one of the most confusing things i have ever read.

  1432. fosho
    Posted May 10, 2010 at 6:03 pm

    This is so true. I’m writing an article on why Twilight is the worst book I’ve ever heard of and I took all the reasons I could back up on this list, plus made about fifty more that were intelligent and could be backed up. I’m doing research for my article and I’ve found quite a few interesting things. First of all, most Twilight fans are incredibly dumb. Just go through the comments on this list. Second, I found quite a few articles on why Twilight is supposedly better than Harry Potter, and every singly reason was completely ridiculous, especially when compared to the sound and logical reasons why Twilight is so terrible. For example “Daniel Radcliffe’s eyes are blue, when Harry Potter’s are supposed to be green” and the worst part was that that comment was the one that made the most sense. Others say it’s easier to relate to Twilight. First, if you judge a book on how good it is by how well you can relate to, please stop reading and judging. Second, how can anyone relate to Twilight?! Now, I have a gigantic and very solid argument against Twilight, and lots of things to say for how great Harry Potter is, but that would take forever and I’ve written quite a bit already. Bottom line: Twilight is ridiculous for SO many reasons.

  1433. skjdkjs
    Posted May 10, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    Why Twilight SUCKS:
    • Very poorly written
    • Completely insane (sex/baby specifically)
    • Pointless
    • Hopelessly pathetic and predictable plotline
    • Helpless female character that needs to be saved and relies heavily on boyfriend
    • Grossly unimaginative-so cliché and childish
    • Unintelligent
    • Only appealing to girls who invest their time in alternate realities because they don’t have a love life and don’t like their own life
    • Attempt at realistic setting when totally unrealistic
    • Shallow
    • “Bella” is a “Plain Jane” and perfect character-useless and whining, how could any boys fall for her?
    • When “Edward” leaves, “Bella” attempts suicide
    • Stephanie Meyer is pretty much writing her own fantasies, with “Bella” as herself
    • Sets unrealistic standards for any poor girl who believes a boy like “Edward” will come for her
    • “Bella” nearly dies millions of times, but “Edward” always saves her, boring
    • “Bella” has no personality, so anyone can put themselves in her shoes, and so the book is popular
    • Teaches “Let men handle everything”
    • Lack of character development
    • Father and Mother let “Bella” be, which is completely not true
    • “Edward” is overly possessive and so predictable and boring
    • Repeatedly describes everything, ex: “Edward’s perfectly toned chest”
    • No fangs, but lots of sparkling. Vampires?!
    • Just lots of adjectives and cuddling and face touching and “breathes”
    • Completely unimaginative names
    • Ridiculous “forbidden love” plot
    • Plot drags on and on
    • “Bella Swan” means “beautiful swan”. Really?!
    • No guys like it
    • If the first 200 pages are based on figuring out what the Cullen family is, why does it say on the back cover that Edward is a vampire?
    • No ACTUAL conflict
    • They fall in love INSTANTLY, for no apparent reason other than “Edward” is handsome and “Bella” smells good
    • “Edward” watches “Bella” while she sleeps
    • Girls go insane over a fictional guy
    • “Bella” has no future goals, her life revolves around “Edward”
    • Creepy age differences: “Edward” and “Bella”, “Renesseme” and “Jacob”
    • “Jacob”, who was always kind to “Bella” and didn’t abuse her, was dumped for ridiculous “Edward”, who later left her
    • It’s offensive to both men and women
    • “Edward” hits on the entire school faculty to get out of classes
    • How can “Bella” and “Edward” have sex if blood is going through “Edward’s” veins?
    • Any flaw mentioned about the book is immediately attacked by fans, they won’t even hear an opinion
    • Harry Potter is so much better you can’t even compare

  1434. Brandie
    Posted May 10, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    My sister reads ALOT of book and i mean ALOT and she works at hooters (talk about contradiction). But for some reason when she picked up the twilight series, She picked up her new bible. Of course i was surprised, I mean this girl used to read chuck palahniuk books like crazy! I tried everything to figure out why in the hell did she like these terrible, terrible, books! But you know what i found out! Shes been having relationship problems for the past year! I even caught her saying “I just have to wait for my edward.” in complete seriousness. Thank god. i thought my sister was just f*cking stupid. This book is her security blanket. One that i want to burn.

  1435. Jacob
    Posted May 12, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    Hey, I’m doing my senior paper on how twilight pales in comparison to shakespeare and want to find out how many times certain words are used in the book. Please help me!!!

  1436. sparkles
    Posted May 12, 2010 at 6:13 pm

    this is so stupid. i mean what loser has enough time to do this? i mean 95 reasons?!

  1437. Posted May 15, 2010 at 6:30 am

    I LOVE THIS THING!!!And isn’t it stupid how people think that Edward is the sexiest man alive?There are two things wrong with that sentence:1. Edward isnt alive!2.Edward just fails to be sexy by miles!Plus they think that EdwardO and his crew are so good at acting but they aren’t because they only have one word to describe the characters like Edward is ‘perfect’ but there is nothing more to his character and same with Alice who is ’sweet.’

  1438. emma
    Posted May 15, 2010 at 11:15 pm

    okay first i think you need to grow up and get over this big jealousy issue you have about Stepheine Meyer.
    Just cos shes made a great fortune with the books doesn’t mean you can dis her and judge her. i dont like the books either but to make 95 things up about why you hate it is so attention seeking. didn’t your mother ever tell you that attention seeking is wrong.
    BTW most of your stupid snide comments related back to you and aren’t even true about the twilight series.
    My suggestion to you is to grow up get a life and stop wasting time writing down your ‘precious’ feelings about Twilight. Your just another speck in the world like the rest of us so stop trying to be a star in the world because i can tell you that while Stepheine Meyer is going somewhere in her life you aren’t, your just a heavy rock sinking to the bottom of a dirty river…going nowhere.

  1439. Posted May 15, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    okay first i think you need to grow up and get over this big jealousy issue you have about Stepheine Meyer.
    Just cos shes made a great fortune with the books doesn\’t mean you can dis her and judge her. i dont like the books either but to make 95 things up about why you hate it is so attention seeking. didn\’t your mother ever tell you that attention seeking is wrong.
    BTW most of your stupid snide comments related back to you and aren\’t even true about the twilight series.
    My suggestion to you is to grow up get a life and stop wasting time writing down your \’precious\’ feelings about Twilight. Your just another speck in the world like the rest of us so stop trying to be a star in the world because i can tell you that while Stepheine Meyer is going somewhere in her life you aren\’t, your just a heavy rock sinking to the bottom of a dirty river…going nowhere.

  1440. Harrypotter
    Posted May 16, 2010 at 2:36 am

    Wow. I cannot agree with you more. I HATE twilight. Harry Potter is WAY better.

  1441. Diana
    Posted May 17, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    65 and 80 made me laugh out loud.
    That is all.

  1442. To whomever reads this,
    Posted May 18, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    I have to say that I’m rather disappointed in some of the people leaving comments on this entry. People say you’re just jealous of Stephanie Meyer and that none of the things stated in your 95 doesn’t occur in Twilight when it actually does. People don’t realize that people have their own opinions and since this is the Internet you may post whatever you please. If you have a problem with the 95 reasons then show it and tell people what is so wrong instead of acting stupid and posting things that barely make sense. If you’re going to make fun of someone or whatever you were attempting then please have the brains to spell correctly. It’s not that hard, kiddies.
    Aside from that, I really enjoyed the reasons. It’s good for a laugh, and some of them do appear in the book (the pedophilia… Eww *shudders*) I enjoy when people slaughter a bad book and ridicule it just for fun. It brings joy to my heart and a smile to my face.

  1443. suck on this
    Posted May 19, 2010 at 12:17 am

    i hate hearing people say \”youre just jealous of stephanie meyer because shes famous and can write\” well first, she cant write, but even if she could, then why wouldnt we just hate on some other author for their fame and books?! we dont, because twilight is the worst book in the history of the world.

  1444. Posted May 19, 2010 at 3:17 pm

    Umm okay? this is stupid.
    ALL of this is just clearly YOUR opinion.
    not that it matters at all. bc it does not!!
    You need to stop hatting.GET A LIFE.
    and stop talking crap.Some people actually like twilight
    and if you don’t well doesn’t that suck for youu!

    God bless. (:

  1445. Some Random Person
    Posted May 20, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    I agree with the vast majority of these, except I’m pretty sure Bella does mention fangs in Eclipse (though not in the way you probably meant it), and I hate Jacob, but don’t get me started on him.

  1446. Some Random Person
    Posted May 20, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    Oh, and also you said Bella was perfect, and then listed a load of her flaws. She’s definately not perfect. Her problem is that she has no likeable qualities.

  1447. Sarah
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 6:08 pm

    Hello! Your reasons are the worst I have ever heard of. I mean come on ever heard that books are just books. Everyone I know that are Twilight Fans all know that Edward is never going to be someone real and going to come for them. You are a LOSER!!!!! Next time think of reasons that really do affect people. Who the hell cares about character development? Oh! I know! U DO!!!! God, you are one retarted person. This book is a book for entertainment not to learn a lesson from.

  1448. Sarah
    Posted May 22, 2010 at 1:37 am

    xD This list is so amazing.
    I have friends who are obsessed with it. Like, watch the movie twenty-one times, read the books repeatedly, not able to spell, StePHanie Meyer’s name right, obsessed.
    & to the very first comment: One, it’s spelled, “retarded.” & two, a real book must have character development to have a plot. i am ashamed to share my first name with you.
    & about the paedophilia, I cannot seem to understand why people scoff when I say I love the book Lolita, then turn around and worship fictional paedophiles like Jacob & Edward.
    & fangs are needed to be a vampire – no doubt about it.
    & I loved the one about how just because she uses too many fancy adjectives, doesn’t mean her writing is good. I was so glad to see I wasn’t the only one to notice that.
    Lastly, to the people who cannot spell or use proper grammar in their comments – please, for the love of God, get Chrome or Mozilla so it can correct your terrible spelling faux-pas.

  1449. Bri
    Posted May 23, 2010 at 1:44 am

    No offence, but its kind of sad that just because twilight annoys you, you type 95 reasons why you hate it. And anyways DONT BE A HATER!!! If you don’t like Twilight then thats your opinion…but you should avoid it then. Seeing the movies and reading the books isn’t a good way of avoiding something you don’t like. By the way, BELLA DIDN’T WANT TO COMITE SUICIDE, SHE WANTED TO SEE EDWARD BY DOING CRAZY THINGS.

  1450. Jade
    Posted May 25, 2010 at 1:28 am

    Honestly, I have to agree that this list isn’t very well written but it is titled “Why I hate twilight” So it’s an opinion and as such, valid. That being said I hate twilight as well. Mainly because it has become more popular than other vampire fiction that’s so much better (Anita Blake, anyone?) I want a shirt that says Team F*** Sparkly Vampires. And I mean metaphorically not literally or, I suppose if Edward wanted it “that way”, he could find a nice boy to settle down with. lol

  1451. ArchBytes
    Posted May 25, 2010 at 11:30 am

    To the dude who said

    \”umm excuse me but tese arent even like real reasons :/
    i mean bella can do without edward shes just heartbroken…wouldnt u be if ur bf dumped be u would be like a corpse if that happened same thing and she didnt try to commit suicide she tried jumping off cliffs to see edward u big idiot have u read harry potter its stupid!!!!! i mean wizards cmon!! grow up!!\”

    I read the series and no I didn\’t like it. I HATED it. When you\’re heartbroken you move on. You don\’t go cliff diving to see your ex. You go cliff diving to forget about your ex and have fun. Harry Potter has more plot than twilight so yes its definitely way better and it has more background and history in it than twilight. And there\’s such a thing as attempted suicide you idiot. It sends the wrong message to teenage girls who get dumped enough said. But I read it for the sake of reading it and that grants me the right to express an opinion. Twilight isn\’t a book, its a blog. Want to see a story with foundation about vampires versus werewolves? Underworld. Not Twilight, definitely not Twilight. As for romance, there\’s Vampire Diaries for that.

  1452. KHEZ
    Posted May 26, 2010 at 2:53 am

    I hate Twilight and the rest of series. I’m not a big fan of ‘weak-minded’ women/girls. To want to die because she can’t be live without Edward is sad. This character has no self worth and no self esteem. To create a character that places herself in near death experiences just to see a ‘glimpse’ of Edward, who to me isn’t a REAL vampire anyways, is pathetic and disturbing. I love vampire and werewolf stories and this series took nearly everything I loved about vampires. So glad I found this because I really do hate Twilight.

  1453. Annie
    Posted May 28, 2010 at 7:04 pm

    The Twilight Series as a whole and its crazed fans are a continuous rape of respectable literature and the entire concept of vampires that has been built over time – not just from Bram Stoker and “Nosferatu”, but the all vampiric history as we know it (or in SOME cases, don’t), even from the most ancient cultures all over the world.
    Anyone with at least some amount of respect for the art of literature and the joy it is to appreciate a good work should agree.

  1454. ChibiPyro
    Posted May 29, 2010 at 8:28 am

    Ah, twilight is such a sad excuse for a book… now why does there have to be so few girls with enough brains to realize that twilight is porly written, and edawrd ISN’T REAL.

  1455. Posted May 31, 2010 at 11:23 am

    I don’t know who u r but u need to read the books again because u don’t even know how long bella had been in forks when edward started watching her. maybe you should just shut ur big fat mouth and try again because you dont know anything about twilight not thank you for being mental.and just to let u know i know some guys who likes twililight and twilight is lot better than you

  1456. Eli
    Posted June 1, 2010 at 6:03 am

    Exactly fhucking correct. Stephanie Meyer is a useless slurry, It’s so embarrassing that our unnecessarily hyped-media infested world is reaching out and gloryfying such lame excuses for novels – being “fantasy”. I mean come on. Its too freaking Cliche, on top of that, there is no compelling substance which supports the overly used romantical phrases and horribly dry use of immature fail vocabulary. And to top her worthless lack of skill, Stephanie Meyer looks like a complete troll, who’d I’d love to slap anyday. PERIOD.

  1457. idiot obsessed girls anger me
    Posted June 1, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    “Well I myself love Twilight. Girls like romantic novels and the Twilight Saga has that. It is romantic what the heart can’t have basically. It shows us that not all guys are mean and some are actually sweet, and compassionate. So guys Twilight is actually helping you. ;) Now I know a lot of guys think well that book is so stupid. Well have you read it from our view guys? So please people who are dissing on Twilight please stop. You have never read the book through our eyes. So to answer you question girls become obsessed with this series because it gives us a view on what is known as ‘true love’, or ’sometimes the heart wants what the heart wants.’ ” This is the dumbest crap i have ever heard, and this is a real quote. GET RID OF TWILIGHT!!!!

  1458. Posted June 2, 2010 at 1:21 am

    Agreed. Except Anne Rice’s vampires are incapable of sex…they’re dead, their bodies don’t function the way a human’s would. And Bella doesn’t try to commit suicide, she’s just stupid and doesn’t think about consequences.

    I have read the complete Twilight Series and it’s okay, but it’s not everything people make it out to be. Stephenie Meyer is not a great writer, and the only reason she’s sort of good is because she got so many fans. This post brings up a LOT of good points.

  1459. Eternity
    Posted June 2, 2010 at 6:12 am

    96. Edward is a STALKER!

  1460. twilighthater
    Posted June 2, 2010 at 6:19 pm

    Well, even though my comment will probably never be read because there are just SO MANY people who, for hundreds of great reasons, HATE TWILIGHT, I’m going to have to state my opinion because I hate it so much as well. Firstly, not only does Twilight suck, but it’s a disgrace to people like Bram Stoker who actually wrote the original Dracula over a hundred years ago, or any other good author for that matter. It’s one thing to suck at writing, it’s another thing to steal someone else’s great idea and make it suck. Give twilight fans some real literature and they are probably to dumb to understand and appreciate it anyway. It’s like trying to convince a zombie not to eat people, they just don’t understand, and it will make them angry.

  1461. Alissa
    Posted June 2, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    #16: THAT’S THE WORST PART! I mean, it’s a nice book to read if you’re bored or something, and I do enjoy reading it, but I can’t take it too seriously. It’s not even the absurd stuff like the sparkly vampires or how they depend on each other waaayyy too much (but that does annoy me). What bother’s me the most is how Stephenie Meyer obviously didn’t learn anything studying literature in college.

    I learned in 6th grade about dynamic and static characters, so she should know too! I write novels, and, Lord, if I don’t have character development, I might as well not write it at all. The best part of reading books is learning more about the characters and the things that have happened to them and their personality that makes them deeper. That’s what advances the story and gets it to the next plot point, too! Character development is what gives you opportunities to deepen the plot, add better reasons for why things happen/why people do things, and add new scenes that make it more interesting.

    I DO enjoy reading the series if I’m just reading it for fun and not thinking about it, but if I start to think about the book, it bothers me and makes me want to rip the pages.

  1462. Posted June 3, 2010 at 11:01 am

    hey guys…i just want to say one thing and that is just stop fussing about edward bcoz u all can never become like him….He is the best..n will always be…

  1463. Tonks
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    Ok, so to start, I am completely obsessed with Harry Potter, and i freely admit that. But, i dont go around screaming Team Harry or Team Malfoy. All the twilight fangirls need to get a life!!!! The books suck, the movies are even worse, and its taking over my fave stores!!!!! Its extremely disgusting and just plain annoying!

  1464. Miss Depressed
    Posted June 5, 2010 at 12:26 am

    The Majority of Twilight fans: Please stop throwing ad-hominem insults at those criticizing the books. “You’re jealous,” or “you’re probably an insecure old (insert cuss word here)” or, “you’ll never go anywhere,” or “Edward is (sexy? amazing? a topaz-eyed angel, god, David, etc.)” does not make for a good argument. If anything, those unbased insults show an appalling lack of maturity and intelligence.

    “hey guys…i just want to say one thing and that is just stop fussing about edward bcoz u all can never become like him….He is the best..n will always be…”

    No comment; this one is self-explanatory. I find the stupidity of a hefty portion of this race exceptionally depressing. Grow up, become educated, and then contribute. The uninformed, rash, and foolish have as much a right to opinion as the rest of society, but that doesn’t mean that opinion has any purpose beyond antagonizing or creating an even more hostile environment. So, please, start contributing to the world.

  1465. Polikey
    Posted June 6, 2010 at 7:27 am

    Huh? So if I just throw in a perfect girl and an abusive guy into a story where nothing really happens except for descriptions on how beautiful they are, I CAN MAKE MONEY? What’s that? I don’t even have to worry about GRAMMAR??!!

    WOW! This is the greatest money-making plan ever! I’ll see you all when I make millions ;)

  1466. CherryPhoenix
    Posted June 6, 2010 at 9:40 pm

    omg this is so true. and yes: i would have loved it if Edward and Jacob admitted they were gay for each other. that would have made the series somewhat entertaining.

  1467. Soleil
    Posted June 7, 2010 at 6:54 am

    I do not hate the movies per se, because every movies got lovers/haters. What I hate about it is the fanbase. Everytime you go onto a showbizzwebsite, you will be confronted with a massive twilight diarrhea. Every fart has to be reported. If they just report something now and then, no problem at all, because every movie has got promotion pictures/interviews/screencaps etc. It’s the massive obsession which I hate.
    Not to mention people who get mad when you say something negative about it, it’s so sad that it becomes hilarious..

  1468. polly
    Posted June 7, 2010 at 12:06 pm

    you said its stupid in about 94 different ways and the one you didn’t (45) only said Bella

    I kill you soon

  1469. daniel
    Posted June 8, 2010 at 8:04 pm

    i think most of those are true but i like twilight but im not a fan and you do know light yagami’s last name back wards is “im a gay”

    dont get me wrong i hate bella because she was all sad for a really long time because edward was gone and jacob wanted her to be happy but instead he hated her guts after she was dating edward again.

  1470. PersonIAm
    Posted June 9, 2010 at 12:51 am

    You know what? This is completely right. Each and every one of these. Even the ones about Chuck Norris and T-pain. You know why? Because twilight sucks. You know what happened about a week before the last day of school? We had a chance to watch a movie and the library played one movie for the entire school. Twilight. We had a sub that day. She liked Twilight. When people who actually think started complaining, she told us to either shut up and watch it, or go to another room and have detention. Half of the entire class (like 16 kids) stayed after that day, proudly singing the theme songs to various shows about real vampires. The sub swore to never return, saying we were rude and ungrateful.

    We gladly shouted back that vampires don’t, and never will sparkle.
    (If you don’t like it, here’s my email. dukeofnachos@yahoo.com
    Do your worst, fangirls. Do your worst.)

  1471. Posted June 12, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    Wow…Rule #89 really made my day. I just love a Death Note reference, and I was actually laughing for a good whole minute while reading that list. Though, I must agree; many of the points you made on that list were very true. Even though I used to be a huge twilight(doesn’t deserve to be capitilized) fan last year, once I cleared my head and matured a little bit I realized how awfully written the book was. I mean, there was practically no plot, at all. I could go on forever, but I’m personally just one to stand on the sidelines and watch the arguement. It’s so amusing to watch illiterate twilight fans complain to the people who dislike the series how ‘amazing’ it is. By the way, where did you come up with rule #89? I absolutely must know. I’m going to share that one with my friends ;)

  1472. Posted June 12, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    hola! i couldn’t agree more. i only read up to number 63. But ur sooo right, and so was i, (even though i never read the series), i think the so called (series “TWILIGHT”. even though only one book is called ‘twilight’, and its not all ways twilight out side in the book). AND I THOUGHT about it. Its problably only called twilight becuz, “Oh Edward, ur so hot when ur about to die in the sunlight on my bday”, Bella said.but even though vampires r suposto die in sunlight, what does edward do..(i only saw half the movie ‘new moon’.) TAKES HIS SHERT OFF AND TRYS TO COMIT SUE A SIDE 4 BELLA! (in day time of corse). thats all i need to do to prove her point on ths web,

  1473. Posted June 12, 2010 at 11:51 pm

    ok its me again, and i read all of it, and guess what I STILL THINK UR RIGHT! i mean i read it all over with my friend and we both giggled. i feel bad (no i really don’t) 4 all of the ppl who love edward. Even my sister, i’ve been be traded by my own family, and WHO MADE THE “TEAM’S”. (oh BOO team jackob -i really do not know how 2 spell his name- oh BOO its team edward).BOO U 4 LIKING ALL OF IT! i mean y r warewolves even in the lame series? its about vampiers not untamed muts.

  1474. Shelby Renee
    Posted June 13, 2010 at 4:39 am

    I\’m not one of those stupid as hell twilight fans.
    I love twilight.
    But I agree with many of your points.

  1475. Karah
    Posted June 13, 2010 at 8:55 pm

    To the moron who says there were no sex scenes in Anne Rice’s books… have you ever read one all the way through? I can think of at least two scenes per book. I have read and own the complete Anne Rice collection. As for the Twilight fandom, don’t make me puke. I read my journal from my tween years and it was filled with more detail than any of Meyers books.

  1476. William
    Posted June 14, 2010 at 9:36 am

    REASON 96: it has destroyed the self esteem of all the guys who were unfortunate enough to have the bright idea to take their other halfs to the films.

  1477. AnimeLover
    Posted June 15, 2010 at 11:34 am

    You shouldn’t insult somebody’s novel…Even if you hate Twilight , you should keep it to yourself but not listing it out …

  1478. Sam Nightingale
    Posted June 16, 2010 at 2:55 am

    I completely agree with everything you’ve said. The structure of the story completely falls apart. I don’t see how anyone could like these books. And for people who actually call this a book, story, novel, or any variations thereof, Twilight is none of those things. It’s as if the, and I use this term very loosely, “writer,” whose name I don’t care to remember, through a whole bunch of words in a pot, stirred it and poured it our on pages. However, she is not the biggest idiot; the publisher who said this was good enough to be published is an even bigger idiot. I feel sorry for the world of writing after taking such a nasty turn.

  1479. zanza
    Posted June 17, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    I have read the books and really (besides the sex thing) cannot find anything innoproppiate about it.
    And though some of reasons were true, some of them were not. My friend and I do write with correct grammer

  1480. zanza
    Posted June 17, 2010 at 6:23 pm

    Yeah and I have read far more books worse than Twilight
    For example: Roll of Thunder Hear My Cry. That book is boring from the beginning. Why don’t people make fun of that book. And don’t you think Holes gets a little drab at the end? The whole book dosn’t really stay on topic anyway.
    There are more you think of some other than that series.

  1481. kate
    Posted June 17, 2010 at 6:56 pm

    You Boys are really annoying me not every girl is a freaky Twilight fan that worships Idiot Edward and wants to be like Retarded Bella. So if you want to talk about how stupid fans are being refer to THE FREAKY TWILIGHT GIRLS.

  1482. A. Nonymous
    Posted June 17, 2010 at 11:06 pm

    THANK YOU! you are right as hell

  1483. amber
    Posted June 18, 2010 at 4:00 am

    your reasons ROCK!!
    loved the death note reason, so briliant! :)
    Light should write edward and bella in his notebook and just kill them, a world wothout twilight fans is a better world (a dreamy world actually)

  1484. Someone deeply wounded
    Posted June 18, 2010 at 4:33 am

    The most disgusting book i have ever laid eyes on. And before you jump to conclusions… I READ it (well most of it up to the part with the monster baby and all yucky things around it). I didn’t see the movie and don’t plan to God forbid!
    It started like a light lecture… nothing horrible about the first parts. Nothing great either… just hormonal mess. It does look though like no one put an effort to actually WRITE IT. Like they just wrote whatever craps came from their horniness. (please excuse the language). It sounds like the entangled dreams of a teenage girl that never had a boyfriend… there, was I subtle enough? (and here I ponder is Meyer married?…just a thought)
    I just couldn’t finish it! I forced myself up till last book and I just deleted it from my iPhone! I can’t believe I wasted so much time reading it and I am apologizing to myself for having suffered the horrid images it left behind!
    May your brains be sane enough to keep away from it.

  1485. Dusk
    Posted June 18, 2010 at 4:52 am

    Harry Potter COULD beat Edward’s ass. It’s simply math.

    Harry Potter > Voldemort > Cedric Diggory

    Cedric Diggory = Edward Cullen

    Harry Potter > Edward Cullen

  1486. Katie Beson
    Posted June 18, 2010 at 6:06 pm

    I think you are so wrong. I loved every moment of Twilight. I think you haven’t even read the book yourself. I also think your jealsous because the author is making a lot of money and your not. I think you should be ashamented of yourself. I also think that 95 reasons I hate Twilight to stupid.
    You couldn’t even come up with 95 reasons yourself!!! And I am pretty sure that you wouldn’t like it if you just sold a top selling book and some-one had just started a website called “I hate Twlight”
    So little tip for the future, think before you act.

  1487. Tiana
    Posted June 18, 2010 at 11:00 pm

    Twilight was just a poorly written unoriginal book/concept; that showcased a very immature girl, that, now, naive young girls model after and a very unreal young man that every girl is looking for. And thank you, for mentioning #32; if Edward is the ‘undead’ then nothing should be flowing down there for him to get Bella pregnant… I’m just saying!

  1488. Grace
    Posted June 20, 2010 at 1:17 am

    ?!READ THIS ONE PLEASE!?

    Well done haha i also believe that twilight isnt a very good book or movie its funny though all these obsessed fans will grow up and some of them will find there true love, most wont, and then there will be those few that get sent to the nut house because they only want Edward Cullen. What i don’t get is why do people have to be so loud about Twilight. What do they think if they yell at Robert Pattinson loud enough he would magically turn in to Edward and wisk them away. I swear some day some crazy person is going to come along and hurt some one because they don’t like Twilight. I just think that if people could just get past the slow motion walks and obsessive reminding of how hot Edward Cullen’s is people could see its only an ok book. Im not going to completely rag because it is hard to right that many words but its just doesn’t deserve the amount of attention its is getting. And think about this….What is going to happen when the last Twilight movie comes out? What are those poor pathetic fools that stand out side the Twilight star’s hotel room going to do….they’ll have no life :D

  1489. Nath
    Posted June 20, 2010 at 3:27 pm

    96. this person is so obviously got some problems of their own to deal with.
    P.S You didn’t like the book should be the one and only reason, read something else

  1490. Death_Note_Beotch
    Posted June 22, 2010 at 7:50 pm

    I agree with anything Light Yagami says!!! AND TO THE MORON NAMED POLLY, BELLA IS SYNONYMOUS WITH STUPID!!! LOOK IT UP IN THE DICTIONARY, BELLA MEANS STUPID!!!! =P

  1491. Posted June 23, 2010 at 12:18 pm

    I was just lent the first Twilight novel and not only is it riddled with spelling and grammatical errors and overuses ellipses like there’s no tomorrow but it is, quite honestly, poorly written.

    Meyer attempts to use poetic description, but overuses it and every five minutes mentions how perfect Edward’s everything is, and I don’t believe I’ve ever seen so many people sigh or breathe out their words instead of speaking them in one novel. The interactions between the characters just isn’t natural. The characters get far too intense about silly things like ‘watch you don’t fall over,’ type chatter.

    And Bella changes through the novel, but not naturally so. At the beginning, she cries over EVERYTHING, but by the time she’s practically humping Edward’s leg 300 pages in, she’s so deadbeat and lacking in any kind of passion or personality that you’d forget she wasn’t just a talking mannequin.

    I’m not a ‘hater’, but I know a poorly written piece of fiction when I see one. I haven’t read the others yet, maybe they improved like the Harry Potter series apparently did as it went on, but I’m almost 340 pages into this novel and so far Bella has met Edward. Edward is a vampire. That’s about it.

    I’m not even kidding or being sarcastic when I say that.

    It takes this long to get into the fact that Edward is a vampire; something that’s mentioned in the blurb making almost 150 pages of the book totally redundant whilst Bella ‘figures out’ with a complete lack of reaction to anything around her, ‘what’ Edward is.

    She’s also rude, uses people, seems to have no redeeming qualities and yet unrealistically has all of these people just one step away from requiring a restraining order.

    The only three intriguing characters in the book are Carlisle, Jasper and Alice, but they are giving such little time to develop because Meyer was too busy writing ten pages on the current colour of Edward’s eyes and how much he’s PMSing because of it, they become redundant.

    Seriously, the novel reads like the blog of a lovesick teenager fawning over a guy who she’s put on such a pedestal she cries when she sees his picture, that is trying to sound like a novel.

    It doesn’t work.

    It might explain why she hasn’t had anything published since 2008.

  1492. Valenta
    Posted June 23, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    Anyone see those pictures of people camping out for several days because of this movie. Can it get any sadder?
    And still wondering why more and more people start hating the obsessed twitards and the series. It’s just sick how these people behave.

    Okay now back on topic.
    The book is so poorly written, it’s an insult to my eyes. ”He smells so good, he’s so gorgeous, his hair is so amazing etc” . And that on basicly every page. It’s just, about nothing. Poor character development also. I couldn’t get through the second book.

    The movies are even more hilarious. What’s up with that fugly blue/green filter they used for the first film? Not to mention the gay looking and sparkling (!) vampires. Bella has got no draft whatsoever.
    The second film was just a match for worst actor, Pattinson or Lautner (in the male category). There was just one nominee and obvious winner for the female category: Stewart. Never seen a ”couple” with such poor chemistry. And the emotionless faces throughout the whole movie are just painfull to look at.

    It makes me sad when people actually say (out loud) that the books are written in a ‘fantastic’ way, that the chemistry/acting is amazing and the movies are really good and might be Oscar-worthy (that last point makes me cry on the inside actually)

  1493. Kristin
    Posted June 25, 2010 at 4:19 am

    “Anyone with at least some amount of respect for the art of literature and the joy it is to appreciate a good work should agree.”

    Literature comes in all forms and genres. A writer is someone who writes, period. Not to mention that I highly doubt anyone who has posted on here exclusively (if ever) reads Shakespeare, Jane Austen or anything else that would be considered “classic literature.” While some parts of the books were loosely based on writings by these people, Twilight is not comparable to either one. It is entirely different. Written in a different time, by a different type of person, in a different voice and style. Each type of writing has its place in the “art of literature.” If you call literature an art, then treat it as an art. Art is art if one person says it’s art. To discount the value of Twilight because it doesn’t have the complexity of Shakespeare or even Harry Potter is incredibly narrow minded. Twilight and similar “light reading” must exist for more complex works of literature to be appreciated for what they are, and vice versa. I hardly consider one to be of more value than the other, just of a different type of value. That is how the world works.

    Without women, there would be no men. There would just be humans.

    Without good, there would be no evil. There would just be existence.

    Without Republicans, there would be no Democrats. There would just be voters.

    Without light reading, there would be no deep reading. There would just be books.

    So, continue to post ridiculous comments and blogs about how one person’s “art” is of less value than another person’s. Perhaps you would like to take it a step further and start burning all the books that aren’t your definition of literature. After that, you can hang every musical artist that doesn’t fit into your idea of real music. While you’re at it, you might as well rid the world of any fashion that doesn’t fit into this mold you’ve created. Maybe at some point, you’ll have created your utopia of perfect people who all read the same books, listen to the same music and wear the same clothing. Might as well start selectively breeding humans, also.

    Don’t forget to gas all the gays and Jews while you’re at it.

    Your mask of intelligence will certainly trick all of the people who don’t make it into your new society into walking right into the gas showers. It is annoying to see obnoxious people misspelling and hating on things for no apparent reason. However, it’s just plain disgusting to see someone who actually thinks that they are the authority on what is acceptable to appreciate as art or literature. I guess I better get my striped pajamas on now and head for the showers.

    There is only one thing I could think of when I read that comment: Heil Hitler.

  1494. Posted June 25, 2010 at 4:56 am

    Very good site.. thanks webmasters…
    thank you admin …
    sesli sohbet
    sesli sohbet
    sesli sohbet
    sesli sohbet
    sesli chat
    sesli sohbet

  1495. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Posted June 26, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    I agree with fuzzieslipperz! Kristen you should shut the hell up and get a life because if twilight is mother fucken good literature then you’re fucken wrong. comments are for unbiased responses. you are biased and rude and you don’t think harry potter are good books! get a fucken life ! Harry Potter are good books!and just because we don’t like twilight because of it’s filthy charecters,ideas and grammar, doesn’t fucken mean that will fucken burn jews and we will want to raise fucken hitler and gas innocent fucken people bacuse we are good people with good fucken hearts and it’s normal to have opinions on fucken things. So SHUT THE MOTHER FUCK UP AND GO AND RUIN SOMEONE ELSES FUCKEN LIFE WITH FUCKEN BIASED OPINIONS ON MOTHER FUCKEN STUPID BOOKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  1496. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Posted June 26, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    I agree with fuzzieslipperz! Kristen you should shut the hell up and get a life because if twilight is mother fucken good literature then you\’re fucken wrong. comments are for unbiased responses. you are biased and rude and you don\’t think harry potter are good books! get a fucken life ! Harry Potter are good books!and just because we don\’t like twilight because of it\’s filthy charecters,ideas and grammar, doesn\’t fucken mean that will fucken burn jews and we will want to raise fucken hitler and gas innocent fucken people bacuse we are good people with good fucken hearts and it\’s normal to have opinions on fucken things. So SHUT THE MOTHER FUCK UP AND GO AND RUIN SOMEONE ELSES FUCKEN LIFE WITH FUCKEN BIASED OPINIONS ON MOTHER FUCKEN STUPID BOOKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  1497. VictorVonDoom
    Posted June 27, 2010 at 7:28 pm

    The only probelm with the list is more than half the reason’s are completely personal and trivial. And I’m not combing 1500+ repsonses to see if anyone corrected you on the Anne Rice crap. First, her Vampires were ‘mostly hot men pawing at each other’ and second, even she didn’t write them that well.

    This is of course isn’t to demean your opinion. It’s just to say 95 real reasons why the books are horrible tripe would have been better.

  1498. ke-shaunta
    Posted June 28, 2010 at 2:07 am

    As someone who likes Twilight,Harry Potter,Anne Rice,Lord of The Rings Etc..Etc…Etc.

    First of all I would Like to know why you think Vampires can\’t get people Pregnant or play Baseball or sparkle…you do know I hope that vampires are not real and that a Writer can make up anything that they want to about vampires(not the first book I read where vampires can Impregnate people Laurell K.Hamilton,Jeaniene Frost).

    Second(A hundred years difference = pedophile) really what Vampire book doesn\’t have much of age difference with the characters

    Third there wasn\’t really 95 why u hate Twilight because some of the were mentioned more then once…like how you hate that they Sparkle and how stupid you think Belle was and about how perfect that Belle and Edwards Characters were…I would point out some other things but I don\’t feel like it.

  1499. By the Way
    Posted June 29, 2010 at 4:42 pm

    ke-shaunta,

    Twilight vampires cannot get people pregnant because the author stated that a) all the vampires’ bodily fluids become venom and b) vampires are never changing (in fact, in answer to this same exact question, the author stated in exact words that her vampires could not, indeed, become pregnant)

    Freewriting is freewriting, but going against one’s own canon is a big no-no. Hence, Twilight vampires should not have children because the author directly stated that they could not.

    Secondly, what is the point of vampire baseball–or sparkling, for that matter? Each bring a plethora of plotholes to the story without really contributing to anything. I mean, won’t bats break if the vampires hit the balls with enough gusto to bring forth the sound of lightning? And how would a sparkling man (New Moon reference) be instantly pointed out and called a vampire? Heck, most individuals would call him a fairy, and not the mythical kind.

    Indeed, Edward is considered a pedophile by society’s standards. Of course vampire books will have characters of differing age groups, but maturity is the key word here. Edward doesn’t seem to treat Bella as an equal, but almost like a baby. He puts her on his lap–he talks down to her and points out her weaknesses–he carries her, he doesn’t have enough respect for her to make her own decisions (college, marriage). Bella is the equivalent of a child in the relationship, and even though I don’t believe her foolish actions warrant her character much respect, the relationship seems far too one-sided and borderline abusive for it to be packaged and marketed as a perfect teenage romance.

  1500. Isisru
    Posted June 30, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    Love your list!

    When Twilight the movie came out, I didn’t know what the hype was all about. So, I wanted to watch the movie to see how good it was. And OMG, it was one of the most boring movies I ever saw. Seriously, it was like a dumb TV show. First few episodes of a TV show put together calling themselves a movie. I wasted 2 hours watching nothing. I wouldn’t waste my time with the books. Books about crazy teens who go gaga for love is not my cup of tea.

  1501. Sara
    Posted June 30, 2010 at 6:06 pm

    i personally liked the books and were a different type of spin on the vampire lore. But i dont see why there is a need to overly hate them and make others hate them . Or like them and hate the people who dont. Theyre just books chill out.

  1502. couldn't agree more than that
    Posted July 1, 2010 at 12:19 pm

    OMG! you just made my night! I’M TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU!

    to all of you who maybe not too happy with her lists, so what? it’s just an opinion and everyone has the rights,,,and here’s the fact that you couldn’t deny.. MOSTLY of her lists were TRUE.

  1503. Lilli
    Posted August 17, 2010 at 9:46 am

    The books are so bland. When I was reading Eclipse for the first time I got so bored half way through it that I returned to the library without finishing it. I finally got it again, read it, and learned that I shouldn’t have bothered.

    Then there is team Jacob and team Edward. It’s so stupid. Personally I was on Team James, until he died. Then Victoria, then she died. I’m on whatever team is currently the enemy.

    Tomorrow is when the new movie ‘Vampires Suck’ comes to Theaters. If you don’t know, it’s a parody on Twilight. I, along with most Twilight haters, am hoping to see it.

    Although some of your reasons are not great, I totally agree with 99% of them.

  1504. Jason Lewis
    Posted August 18, 2010 at 11:11 pm

    If you hate TWILIGHT, watch this drunk redneck bitch rant about how much it sucked!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKWCGocD56Q

    It’s hysterical!

  1505. Emily
    Posted August 26, 2010 at 1:27 am

    I must confess that I myself am a Twilight fan. But being an extreme lover of books I can respect each and every one of your reasons for hating Twilight. Even as I enjoy reading these books I am still taken aback at how terrible they are.

    I just had to tell you that I loved this post and I have to agree with you completely, especially when it comes to the fact that there is not even a way to compare Twilight and Harry Potter. No contest Harry Potter always kicks ass.

  1506. loretta jenkins
    Posted August 28, 2010 at 1:18 am

    If u wonna see a agreemunt … u ort ta warch my utoob episode. Jess go ta “youtube” an tipe in “How I Seize It – twilight.’ u will luv it.

    Loretta Jenkins

  1507. Taylor.
    Posted August 30, 2010 at 6:32 pm

    Harsh, dude.
    And it seemed like a lot of these “reasons” were just the same ones reworded over and over. Also, there’s a lot of outright slaughtering of the novel (for instance, the word “loser” was used when describing the readers of the novel [rule 12] — in other words, the readers of the article [and please don't tell me there are people here who haven't read the book. There can't be anything more absent-minded then the slandering of something you haven't considered firsthand]. And this is just specularity observation on my part, but is it intelligent to insult your own audience?) instead of a real critical overview. It gives this whole “article” a sense of childish ranting, and moreover even the idea of this article existing in the first place is base, as it were: without listing good aspects of the novel (and yes, there are some. It’s a bestseller for some good reasons, like it or not), and by simply discrediting the same objectives over and over, this article shames itself to nothing but meaningless conjecture; in other words, literary gibbrish wrapped in a bow-tie, meant for twilight-haters who have time but not thought to spare. Most likely teenagers. And on that sensible note, you’re as bad as Meyer, if not worse.

    Now, I only bothered with commenting because I’m tired of people slashing Twilight without real prose. You all seem like the same person to me. The obsession of dislike from the anti-twilight bashers is just as bad as the fan’s adoration. It’s sickening.

    And that being said,
    I have a distaste for Twilight myself. Upon reading the entire series, the characters (especially Edward) stuck me as invisible, the plot was scattered, and it seemed like it was trying too hard without consideration for the reader.

    But the lengths people go to bash it is insane.

    It leads me to believe that most people who are angry at the books are the very same people who were sucked into Meyer’s series — and then, upon being told that it wasn’t that great after all, flipped without question and started throwing tantrums about the book like small children, blaming the /book/ for their own experiences. It’s not like Meyer started writing for the solitary goal of tricking everyone, that’s insane. People with sense would have no reason to loath a simple bad story so much, unless jealous of Meyer’s fame.

    Shame on all of you.

  1508. Posted August 31, 2010 at 10:00 am

    Rage guy is fooling around in Mexico City using Google’s Street View, and it’s for sure that he will find something that will make him mad!

    http://www.gixman.com/rage-guy-goes-to-mexico-via-google-streetview/

  1509. jenna
    Posted August 31, 2010 at 11:18 am

    why always great series had a ugly girl character ?bella was was reallyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ugly and STUPID ! everyone in the twilight is idiot actually but anyways … i must say bella was really UGLY !

  1510. Mallory
    Posted September 1, 2010 at 1:13 am

    Dear writer guy,
    I thought you might like to know I just used your reasons to write an essay about how much I “love” Twilight. Obviously a satire, of course. Should turn out to be pretty great. Thanks for the homework help!

  1511. michael
    Posted September 2, 2010 at 10:11 am

    I love the list i found everyone to be true but half the comments made me laugh harder because there from the die-hard twilight faans who think you’ve just tried to kill there version of Jesus or something.
    im with S.W.A.T
    Strong
    women
    against
    twilight

    even though im a dude because it’s better then liking twilight

  1512. Posted September 5, 2010 at 2:36 am

    i reeli appreciate ur attemt in writin d wholr thing….but sum facts r rong…lyk bella commitin a suicide n all…well shes actually not…go read d series once agn..!! :P

  1513. Gingersnap
    Posted September 5, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    **Plz read!**

    WTF is wrong with you braindead idiots?! Are you all 13 yr old girls? This was the FUNNIEST list i have ever freakin read!!! i loved it!!!! I even C&P some of it for some other friends to read, i kno my byf will get a kick out of it. We thot the movie were the most pathetic attempt at making money weve ever seen! So for the NON Twlt fans.. THANK GOD there are still some of us out there SANE!!
    Keep on with the List plzzz :)

  1514. Posted September 7, 2010 at 6:40 am

    I’m a big twilight fan but found your article interesting and agree with you to some extent.

  1515. Maria Ramirez
    Posted September 7, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    i HATE twilight….and harry potter is AWESOME!!!!! all my friends are crazy about twilight and im like what the hell is wrong with you??? imaging how many poor trees had to die in order for them to print those twilight books?? What happening to this world??? i need an answer NOW!!!

  1516. Justin Montello
    Posted September 11, 2010 at 11:46 pm

    # 43 is my reason alone but you know let the rabid fans have their fun not only Anne Rice if you want a real vampire read pick up Brian Lumley an English writer that kicks all vampire authors ass.

  1517. Twilight Sucks
    Posted September 14, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    Um, just wanted to point out that, unlike said at the top of the list, even if a book is fictional, points made for or against it should be real. Otherwise…it just doesn’t work. Even if the book is Twilight. But aside from that, you had some excellent points up there and made me laugh. So well done.

  1518. Arya Svit-Kona
    Posted September 16, 2010 at 9:55 pm

    Ooh, this is so true! I admit that I used to be a Twihard, but then I found this wonderful site, learned a few terms, went back and looked at the books and I saw what Twilight was. A list of cliches. Thank you for writing this list!!

  1519. nifty
    Posted September 17, 2010 at 10:34 am

    I agree. I can’t believe that i read the first book. Fate did something I had to watch the second film and finally I don’t have to bare with twilight. Even matrix makes more sense. Vampires are so last year…

    Why does the skin glitter is it because she didn’t want to kill Edward in the first place.

  1520. -
    Posted September 17, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    Twilight may be a bad series, but this list is worse. If you are going to argue against Twilight, why not be entertaining? make a better argument than this junk.

  1521. Lyla _Lu
    Posted September 26, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    Five Reasons I hate Twilight -

    1. The Fans (too hardcore , I love Jane Eyre doesn’t mean I set up a cult and become blind to it’s faults)

    2.Stephanie Meyer ( Way too smug – “she thought of it in a dream?” yeah right . More like she was watching an old episode of buffy and thought I’ll make a happy ending to this and make buffy brain dead- and a mormon? yeah I guess braindead bella takes after her creator)

    3. Too many books( It should have ended with twilight – bella should have become a vampire – full stop- there no more pointless sequels for her too make money out of)

    4.Wheres the sex? – i mean real sex – not randomly beating her up in the sea and then no details( I mean it’s an overdone formula but parts of the story are ok but too much crap in between – I mean theres no sex . Maybe a more realistic relationship which ended in two vampires at the end of the first novel . Then if sequels were made they would have focused less on children and marriage ( boring)).

    5. The MOVIES – I can’t stand those useless money making machines called films . With poor actors and a terrible script .

  1522. Lili
    Posted September 26, 2010 at 7:24 pm

    I was watching the movies and found myself either falling asleep or fast forwarding through all the long boring, dragged out scenes….movie turned out to be about 30mins long by doing that. Also, if someone likes Twilight, good for them, but it\’s the annoyingly obnoxious fangirls who go to every twilight sighting wearing team retard shirts and waving \”marry me\” signs who I can\’t stand! Not to mention, hottopic was going down to toilet for years and now that twilight is all over hottopic, I\’m surprised it hasn\’t been shut down. And yes, Bella should have been with Jacob instead because he\’s sexier than Edward and also, he cared and saved Bella\’s gay ass from drowning. The only likable characters were Jacob, Alice, and Jasper. Jacob has a thing Edward doesn\’t, balls! Alice actually had a personality and was the one person who wasn\’t depressing or has something up their ass. Jasper had his moments where he was as lame as Bella, but when he used his so called powers to manipulate someone\’s mood, that just goes to show that he\’s a dick and Alice likes it cause why? Sane chicks like dicks and balls, and not sparkling possessive homos!

  1523. Sayan
    Posted September 29, 2010 at 6:04 am

    Twilight SUCKS…..Is this book what we call literature?…It’s a disgrace to true book lovers.It’s an insult to the whole world of literature….Sarah,you are absolutely right…and your reasons were just hilarious………..Twilight is a monotonous description of an immatured girl’s obsession regarding her blunt and idiotic relationship with a lame vampire.

  1524. Twilight Hater #1
    Posted September 29, 2010 at 9:54 pm

    I completely agree with you. The entire twilight series is crap.

    Can books be unpublished? Twilight should be.

    I wonder what publishing company took it upon themselves to publish such pathetic writing I can’t even bring myself to call a book.

  1525. Alpha the Rabid Monkey hates Twilight
    Posted October 1, 2010 at 10:06 am

    I apologize to the many people who adore the Twilight series, but these are my opinions on Twilight.
    I actually consider Twilight to be an anti-book because it’s just so far below any other real book, and the only reason I ever wanted to see the movie was because my friend wouldn’t stop talking about it, and the world wouldn’t stop talking about it, and the only reason I wanted to read the book was because I had just watched the movie. Now I’m not lying when I say that I only wanted to read the anti-books to see how stupid they were, but I was actually brainwashed by the lack of plot, the weird behavior of the characters, and just the whole stupid idea of such a relationship between a vampire and a human… I mean, who thought that up? No offense to the landslide of vampire books that followed, but seriously, that’s gotta be the dumbest thing ever! Vampires are creatures of the night, they lurk in the shadows searching for prey, they are cold, emotionless, killing machines, they DON’T sparkle, and they should stay that way! So how messed up would you be to actually start liking one!?! I am honestly ticked off by how this whole idea is infecting girls with the idea of a boyfriend who is not only an abusive creeper, but is, like, over a hundred years old! And Bella… I just can’t put her into words.
    For like the month I was reading the anti-books, I was acting really irritably, like half of me burn every shred of paper that had been contaminated with this Twilight thing, but the other half of me couldn’t do it. Finally, my mom tore me away from the series right before I lost my mind, which was already hanging by a thread, right in the middle of Eclipse, which I thankfully hid under my bed and swore never to remove it from where it belonged. Breaking Dawn sits, unread, deep inside my closet. Occasionally, I open up Twilight for a good laugh now and then, but I never read more than a few sentences, for fear of reliving the murder of my brain cells.
    The only part of the book I liked was when Bella jumped off the cliff. THAT was funny, unlike the rest of the book, which was just a bad joke. Don’t even get me started on the Bella/Emmett thingies that everyone is suddenly posting on the Internet.
    Sorry, Meyer, and sorry to all the fans of Twilight, but Super Mario and Papa Smurf could pwn Edward Cullen.

  1526. Nobody in particular
    Posted October 1, 2010 at 10:23 am

    Twilight is cool and all, but some parts of it are just kinda weird… like many times during the first book, all that’s being written about is Bella telling us stuff we already know! Seriously, for a few pages, she is like “Blah blah blah blah. Blah blah? Blah blah blah blah. Blah.”
    In the movie, Bella dresses like a turd, and in the books too. Really. It’s always brown, brown, brown.
    It’s also kinda depressing how everyone in that book is all bitter and sour and hates life.

  1527. Sapphi
    Posted October 8, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    Whatever.your so wrong and obviously don’t really have a life so you made this list.Life was kinda boring till twilight came along.so i got 4 words for you………..suck a dick bitch! ;(

  1528. ennie
    Posted October 13, 2010 at 10:43 am

    to the person who said the first quote, may I just say, acquire the power to spell.

  1529. Posted October 14, 2010 at 3:37 am

    …vampires can get women pregnant. It’s really up to the writer as to which attributes of the myths and legends they wish to use, but in vampire folklore, there’s a creature called a “dhampir,” which is the offspring that resulted from a male vampire copulating with a human female. They appear in lots of vampire fiction all over the place, most notably in Hideyuki Kikuchi’s Vampire Hunter D.

  1530. Posted October 19, 2010 at 1:34 am

    Twilight was the stupidest book ever out, shes gotta get over Edward far out, all she does in the book is talk about Edward and his angel like beuty,
    well his a pretty hairy vampire bro.
    For half of the book she doesnt even know his a vampire, bro now wonder Edward cant read her brain, because she got none.

    In the book all they do is touch each oters face, bro just got root her for god sack.
    His a such a pussy and even though he might eat her just turn her into a vampire and youcan do it as much as you wan, srsly bro get a life you virgin.

  1531. Daniel:)
    Posted October 19, 2010 at 1:42 am

    http://www.cronulla.blacktown.doonside,aussietown.com.au

    from The [WOA]-Dan

  1532. pauline =P
    Posted October 19, 2010 at 6:07 am

    honestly i am not a big fan of twilight myself but it doesn’t really look as though u hate it because if u really did u would not waste your time writing 95 reasons why not to read it ….. uh point less much !! it just kind of seems like you enjoy it u just don’t want to admit it because your friends and a lot of people around you hate it and think it is lame

  1533. pauline =P
    Posted October 19, 2010 at 6:08 am

    honestly i am not a big fan of twilight myself but it doesn\’t really look as though u hate it because if u really did u would not waste your time writing 95 reasons why not to read it ….. uh point less much !! it just kind of seems like you enjoy it u just don\’t want to admit it because your friends and a lot of people around you hate it and think it is lame

  1534. Utkarsh
    Posted October 24, 2010 at 5:19 am

    Wow, I can’t believe the number of assholes who took this seriously. These were just fun, yet true reasons to not like the book! Deal with it!

  1535. Martine
    Posted October 24, 2010 at 2:23 pm

    Your points are not particularly valid.
    !. Bella is an unusually strong and intelligent girl, true. But she isn’t a Mary Sue. She is a martyr. She loves Edward so strongly, that she can not survive without him. That is certainly a major flaw. Most importantly, she is a great character. If she were a Mary Sue, you could easily show me a similar character. Name one. I dare you. You won’t be able to. Bella is a very refreshing antidote to the silly Daria-esque YA heroines who are rude, negative, unable to listen, and who blame everyone trying to help them because they get so frightened in dangerous situations.
    2. As for her effectiveness Bella has no super strength, but she makes a lot of contributions. It is Bella who figures out what Victoria is up to, and how she is behind Riley when the Culens don’t get it. It is Bella who saves Edward from being killed by the Venturi when he choses to die. It is Bella who saves Jacobs life by kissing him before he goes to fight. In the end it is Bellas’ mind protecting power that saves them all from a vicious fight with the Venturi. need I go on? The best thing is Bella never creates the dangerous problems by running away and doing something thoughtless and dangerous like the typical little Romance heroine snots do!
    Im not going through all your silly points, but one really stands out. The world of each author that choses the vampire myth is theirs alone. For example traditional vampire stories like Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”, Le Fanu’s Carmilla, and the Polidori’s “the Vampyre” all have vampires that WALK in the daylight. The whole vampire going poof in sunlight is an invention of the movies only. But many authors who don’t do much research from Anne Rice to Cassandra Claire have vampires that can’t stand the sun. Thats Ok. Everyone can have their own take on things. But its nice to note that Meyer’s actually stays far more tru to the original esteemed writers version of vampires then most other YA vampire lit. I’ll bet you didn’t know that. Since you didn’t mention any actual times when Meyers broke her own rules, I can’t say anything specific, except that I think you are wrong.
    I truly hope many girls take away from this great book series the many things that make Bella such a great role model. her bravery. Her strong morals, and her polite manner. Her steadfast love, her strong passions, and her embracing the adventure rather then sulking and wishing she was a normal girl. That alone would make Bella worth her salt. Unl;ike so many sulky girls in these books who snivel about how they just want things to go back to normal, and how they just want their mommy to wipe their behinds and put them to bed, Bella never even once is sorry that all the danger and excitement started. Unlike the typical snots who discover that they were born with a special power, and can’t mommy please make it go away, Bella pursues becoming an immortal. She braves the danger, and isn’t afraid to take a chance. May we all be a bit more like her.

  1536. Martine
    Posted October 24, 2010 at 2:25 pm

    Oh…and sorry about the typos above. This keyboard is very old.

  1537. Manaba
    Posted October 30, 2010 at 8:44 pm

    Ok so there were waaaaay too many comments to read them all but I thought I’d have my say xD. I read books 1 & 2, and skim read 3 & 4 and to be completely honest I just couldn’t enjoy them as much as I wanted to. I wasn’t overly happy about the depiction of female and male roles within the book and was worried more over with the character Edward Cullen. I’ll get to Bella in a moment, just sit tight for a little bit longer xD

    Edward Cullen portrays the characteristics of a psychopathic stalker. He is controlling, agressive, angry and depressed and takes it out on Bella a lot of the time. He pulls her in seductively then pushes her away the second she reacts like a normal hot blooded woman. That is just crazy! Seriously, sex (consenting) is not a sin or a crime – it’s enjoyable and amazing and surely Meyer knows this? After all (I did some research) Mormons are taught that sex is good and to enjoy and love having large families. Studies show that out of all religions, Mormon couples are the most fertile on earth… Oops, wandered off the beaten path there… Anyway, so our young master Cullen waffles on about how he could kill our Miss Swan with effortless ease, brow beats her, is basically a few steps short of being a wife beater and her reaction to this is… Well, we’ll get to her now…

    Bella Swan could have been GREAT. Intelligent, slim, long brown silky hair, smooth ivory skin, brown eyes… From her discription if I ’swung that way’ I’d probably have a thing for her too… But oh, Meyer, why?? She is a clumsy, whingy, complaining, amazingly arrogant little brat that simply cannot do a thing without a man… She falls in love with a man (with qualities listed above) for his looks alone. Wow. WOW. That is so shallow! She is 100% totally AWESOME about his freakish, stalking, controlling behaviour, hangs on his every word and yet seems to me to be half walking on eggshells around Eddie boy because everything she says and does seems to upset him one way or another. Most girls would normally run a mile but oh no, not our beautiful swan. And when he leaves her in book two? OMG. Seriously. She becomes incredibly depressed and for not much short for 7 months cannot live happily ever again without her man. Jacob Black steps in to save the day, she takes the opportunity to use him so she can feel something other than nothingness, strings him along for a decent amount of time and then cruelly and uncerimoniously dumps his ass to be with Edward who had completely destoyed her at the beginning of book two. There’s a quote near the end of New Moon that she would prefer to die at his side rather than live a long life without him. Seriously Bella? Seriously? Yes, because that’s really healthy, at the grand OLD age of… ehem… eighteen…

    I can look past the endless adjectives, descriptions, lack of character development and I can understand that sometimes you just can’t help who you fall in love with. But Bella is so weak, for lack of a better word. She allows herself to be spoken down to, pushed around, caught when she falls over and other such stuff. What would I have given to read her actually hitting the floor, talking back to Edward in that ‘Don’t f*ck with me’ tone and telling other vampires that if they touched her like that again there were going to be some serious issues? Some proper inner strength would have been lovely to see in the books.

    I apologise for this long comment… I know there are twilight fans and I can sort of understand why you all love it but I think I prefer the films to the books (something I never usually say as a book reader). No hard feelings to you fans at all, I just can’t see past those issues I suppose xD

    Big Love to Ya’ll xD x

  1538. Posted October 30, 2010 at 8:44 pm

    Ok so there were waaaaay too many comments to read them all but I thought I\’d have my say xD. I read books 1 & 2, and skim read 3 & 4 and to be completely honest I just couldn\’t enjoy them as much as I wanted to. I wasn\’t overly happy about the depiction of female and male roles within the book and was worried more over with the character Edward Cullen. I\’ll get to Bella in a moment, just sit tight for a little bit longer xD

    Edward Cullen portrays the characteristics of a psychopathic stalker. He is controlling, agressive, angry and depressed and takes it out on Bella a lot of the time. He pulls her in seductively then pushes her away the second she reacts like a normal hot blooded woman. That is just crazy! Seriously, sex (consenting) is not a sin or a crime – it\’s enjoyable and amazing and surely Meyer knows this? After all (I did some research) Mormons are taught that sex is good and to enjoy and love having large families. Studies show that out of all religions, Mormon couples are the most fertile on earth… Oops, wandered off the beaten path there… Anyway, so our young master Cullen waffles on about how he could kill our Miss Swan with effortless ease, brow beats her, is basically a few steps short of being a wife beater and her reaction to this is… Well, we\’ll get to her now…

    Bella Swan could have been GREAT. Intelligent, slim, long brown silky hair, smooth ivory skin, brown eyes… From her discription if I \’swung that way\’ I\’d probably have a thing for her too… But oh, Meyer, why?? She is a clumsy, whingy, complaining, amazingly arrogant little brat that simply cannot do a thing without a man… She falls in love with a man (with qualities listed above) for his looks alone. Wow. WOW. That is so shallow! She is 100% totally AWESOME about his freakish, stalking, controlling behaviour, hangs on his every word and yet seems to me to be half walking on eggshells around Eddie boy because everything she says and does seems to upset him one way or another. Most girls would normally run a mile but oh no, not our beautiful swan. And when he leaves her in book two? OMG. Seriously. She becomes incredibly depressed and for not much short for 7 months cannot live happily ever again without her man. Jacob Black steps in to save the day, she takes the opportunity to use him so she can feel something other than nothingness, strings him along for a decent amount of time and then cruelly and uncerimoniously dumps his ass to be with Edward who had completely destoyed her at the beginning of book two. There\’s a quote near the end of New Moon that she would prefer to die at his side rather than live a long life without him. Seriously Bella? Seriously? Yes, because that\’s really healthy, at the grand OLD age of… ehem… eighteen…

    I can look past the endless adjectives, descriptions, lack of character development and I can understand that sometimes you just can\’t help who you fall in love with. But Bella is so weak, for lack of a better word. She allows herself to be spoken down to, pushed around, caught when she falls over and other such stuff. What would I have given to read her actually hitting the floor, talking back to Edward in that \’Don\’t f*ck with me\’ tone and telling other vampires that if they touched her like that again there were going to be some serious issues? Some proper inner strength would have been lovely to see in the books.

    I apologise for this long comment… I know there are twilight fans and I can sort of understand why you all love it but I think I prefer the films to the books (something I never usually say as a book reader). No hard feelings to you fans at all, I just can\’t see past those issues I suppose xD

    Big Love to Ya\’ll xD x

  1539. Posted October 30, 2010 at 8:49 pm

    Ok so there were waaaaay too many comments to read them all but I thought I’d have my say xD. I read books 1 & 2, and skim read 3 & 4 and to be completely honest I just couldn’t enjoy them as much as I wanted to. I wasn’t overly happy about the depiction of female and male roles within the book and was worried more over with the character Edward Cullen. I’ll get to Bella in a moment, just sit tight for a little bit longer xD

    Edward Cullen portrays the characteristics of a psychopathic stalker. He is controlling, agressive, angry and depressed and takes it out on Bella a lot of the time. He pulls her in seductively then pushes her away the second she reacts like a normal hot blooded woman. That is just crazy! Seriously, sex (consenting) is not a sin or a crime – it’s enjoyable and amazing and surely Meyer knows this? After all (I did some research) Mormons are taught that sex is good and to enjoy and love having large families. Studies show that out of all religions, Mormon couples are the most fertile on earth… Oops, wandered off the beaten path there… Anyway, so our young master Cullen waffles on about how he could kill our Miss Swan with effortless ease, brow beats her, is basically a few steps short of being a wife beater and her reaction to this is… Well, we\’ll get to her now…

    Bella Swan could have been GREAT. Intelligent, slim, long brown silky hair, smooth ivory skin, brown eyes… From her discription if I ’swung that way’ I’d probably have a thing for her too… But oh, Meyer, why?? She is a clumsy, whingy, complaining, amazingly arrogant little brat that simply cannot do a thing without a man… She falls in love with a man (with qualities listed above) for his looks alone. Wow. WOW. That is so shallow! She is 100% totally AWESOME about his freakish, stalking, controlling behaviour, hangs on his every word and yet seems to me to be half walking on eggshells around Eddie boy because everything she says and does seems to upset him one way or another. Most girls would normally run a mile but oh no, not our beautiful swan. And when he leaves her in book two? OMG. Seriously. She becomes incredibly depressed and for not much short for 7 months cannot live happily ever again without her man. Jacob Black steps in to save the day, she takes the opportunity to use him so she can feel something other than nothingness, strings him along for a decent amount of time and then cruelly and uncerimoniously dumps his ass to be with Edward who had completely destoyed her at the beginning of book two. There’s a quote near the end of New Moon that she would prefer to die at his side rather than live a long life without him. Seriously Bella? Seriously? Yes, because that’s a really healthy thing to say at the grand OLD age of… ehem… eighteen…

    I can look past the endless adjectives, descriptions, lack of character development and I can understand that sometimes you just can’t help who you fall in love with. But Bella is so weak, for lack of a better word. She allows herself to be spoken down to, pushed around, caught when she falls over and other such stuff. What would I have given to read her actually hitting the floor, talking back to Edward in that ‘Don’t f*ck with me’ tone and telling other vampires that if they touched her like that again there were going to be some serious issues? Some proper inner strength would have been lovely to see in the books.

    I apologise for this long comment… I know there are twilight fans and I can sort of understand why you all love it but I think I prefer the films to the books (something I never usually say as a book reader). No hard feelings to you fans at all, I just can’t see past those issues I suppose xD

    Big Love to Ya’ll xD x

  1540. Posted October 30, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    Ok so there were waaaaay too many comments to read them all but I thought I\’d have my say xD. I read books 1 & 2, and skim read 3 & 4 and to be completely honest I just couldn\’t enjoy them as much as I wanted to. I wasn\’t overly happy about the depiction of female and male roles within the book and was worried more over with the character Edward Cullen. I\’ll get to Bella in a moment, just sit tight for a little bit longer xD

    Edward Cullen portrays the characteristics of a psychopathic stalker. He is controlling, agressive, angry and depressed and takes it out on Bella a lot of the time. He pulls her in seductively then pushes her away the second she reacts like a normal hot blooded woman. That is just crazy! Seriously, sex (consenting) is not a sin or a crime – it\’s enjoyable and amazing and surely Meyer knows this? After all (I did some research) Mormons are taught that sex is good and to enjoy and love having large families. Studies show that out of all religions, Mormon couples are the most fertile on earth… Oops, wandered off the beaten path there… Anyway, so our young master Cullen waffles on about how he could kill our Miss Swan with effortless ease, brow beats her, is basically a few steps short of being a wife beater and her reaction to this is… Well, we\\\’ll get to her now…

    Bella Swan could have been GREAT. Intelligent, slim, long brown silky hair, smooth ivory skin, brown eyes… From her discription if I \’swung that way\’ I\’d probably have a thing for her too… But oh, Meyer, why?? She is a clumsy, whingy, complaining, amazingly arrogant little brat that simply cannot do a thing without a man… She falls in love with a man (with qualities listed above) for his looks alone. Wow. WOW. That is so shallow! She is 100% totally AWESOME about his freakish, stalking, controlling behaviour, hangs on his every word and yet seems to me to be half walking on eggshells around Eddie boy because everything she says and does seems to upset him one way or another. Most girls would normally run a mile but oh no, not our beautiful swan. And when he leaves her in book two? OMG. Seriously. She becomes incredibly depressed and for not much short for 7 months cannot live happily ever again without her man. Jacob Black steps in to save the day, she takes the opportunity to use him so she can feel something other than nothingness, strings him along for a decent amount of time and then cruelly and uncerimoniously dumps his ass to be with Edward who had completely destoyed her at the beginning of book two. There\’s a quote near the end of New Moon that she would prefer to die at his side rather than live a long life without him. Seriously Bella? Seriously? Yes, because that\’s a really healthy thing to say at the grand OLD age of… ehem… eighteen…

    I can look past the endless adjectives, descriptions, lack of character development and I can understand that sometimes you just can\’t help who you fall in love with. But Bella is so weak, for lack of a better word. She allows herself to be spoken down to, pushed around, caught when she falls over and other such stuff. What would I have given to read her actually hitting the floor, talking back to Edward in that \’Don\’t f*ck with me\’ tone and telling other vampires that if they touched her like that again there were going to be some serious issues? Some proper inner strength would have been lovely to see in the books.

    I apologise for this long comment… I know there are twilight fans and I can sort of understand why you all love it but I think I prefer the films to the books (something I never usually say as a book reader). No hard feelings to you fans at all, I just can\’t see past those issues I suppose xD

    Big Love to Ya\’ll xD x

  1541. merah
    Posted November 3, 2010 at 9:37 am

    Lmao, awesome dude! I love your Harry Potter and Death Note references <3 :D

  1542. Posted November 3, 2010 at 1:15 pm

    i think thats true i HATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS BOOK. i even made a fan page on facebook on how hates twilight i people have joined i think that people who like this book dont know what there reading!!!!!

  1543. Posted November 10, 2010 at 6:41 am

    Thank you thank you thank you, I’m adding you as a friend just because of this article. A friend gave me the books and gushed about them, I read and thought ok was she writing for 5 year olds? Meyer knows nothing about writing, absolutely nothing. I get that people like the actors in the movie but those books are rubbish, they are an insult to literature and an insult to the public.
    Meyer has destroyed all we knew and loved about vampires, she should stop writing because she sucks.

  1544. Brooke Summer Suicide
    Posted November 12, 2010 at 9:26 pm

    I actually laughed out loud at some of those points, love life :)

  1545. Berninger
    Posted November 15, 2010 at 4:03 am

    epic lulz

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCgX3ngOLN0

  1546. Posted November 17, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    You may think Edward Cullen is smart and fast, but Chuck Norris could take him.
    Awesome.
    - Ken

  1547. Nefarious
    Posted November 21, 2010 at 2:10 am

    The comments were so fun to read XD

  1548. Dobby
    Posted November 21, 2010 at 10:58 pm

    Here is a better written article on why Twilight isn’t so good for you:
    http://beaconblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/beacon-opinion-what-do-women-see-in-twilight-men/

    I really like this article because it gives me the male perspective on the whole Twihards issue.

  1549. Lightsandcandy
    Posted November 22, 2010 at 11:30 pm

    Lol, #89

  1550. Nicole
    Posted November 26, 2010 at 9:36 pm

    Okay. Quite honestly, I am a huge Twilight fan. I don’t care what other people think of it all I care about is that I like it. And it’s one thing to bash a book, but the people who read them as well? You don’t know any of us and you’re just making crude assumptions. So just because we like Twilight we’re stupid fangirls who have nothing better to do that rant on how hot Edward is? Sorry to disappoint you, but that’s not the way it works. And the fact that Twilight bothers you so much just shows how obsessed you really are with this series, even if its not in a good way. Think about it. You took the time to write a list on 95 reasons why Twilight sucks. You’re letting Twilight take up your time, even when you said it was a waste. A little hypocritical? I would say so. Oh and by the way, I don’t know about you but I don’t see any grammatical mistakes in here.

  1551. Kate
    Posted November 27, 2010 at 11:43 am

    I tried to read the first book. Got halfway through it, before spraying it with deodorant and setting it on fire. Then taking it (not on fire) into my school and throwing it onto the roof of the languages block. I am a fangirl, just not of twilight. I hate it/ The one twilight fangirl I know doesn’t shut up about it

  1552. Posted November 29, 2010 at 7:08 pm

    Wow. I’m glad you took the time to write all that. Hahaha. You must love Twilight to be willing to write all of this stuff about it. Shut up :) Bahahah.

  1553. katrina
    Posted November 29, 2010 at 10:39 pm

    the most embarassing thing ive ever had to admit was that I use to be obsessed with Twilight.
    Why did I like it?
    - edward, the hot guy noticed bella, the shy and plain girl
    - edward was hot nd rich nd perfect
    -bella read the same books as me
    - bella was clumsy and witty and was clearly pretty even though she didnt see it
    - bella was an invidivual who didnt care what people thought about her

    so why am I embarassed to say I liked it?
    THE MOVIES
    they were probably the worst thing my eyes have ever seen… rob is an extremely unattractive constipated horrid actor
    and krsiten is annoying to listen to. Period. The dialogue lacked witicism, purpose, and quite frankly it was just poorly written.
    same with the effects, at one point it looks like they told rob to lay on his back and kick the air while they would attempt to photoshop it onto a tree.

    anywho, cant read the books anymore because now I notice all the flaws….
    what troubles me most however is : WHY THE HELL IS IT ROMANTIC THAT EDWARD STALKS BELLA, WATCHES HER SLEEP WITHOUT HER KNOWING, AND DECIDES WHETHER OR NOT TO KILL HER???
    …just wondering, cuz my little brother got nightmares lol :P

  1554. To the dumb ones here...
    Posted December 3, 2010 at 7:28 am

    Firstly, great list. It creates a great awareness that Twilight is pathetic and A WASTE OF TIME.

    And to the dumb ones… One of you (FAIL) said that SMeyer does create original names. WRONG. SMeyer didn’t create Jasper and Esme, those names are old English names. What the author of the list meant was that she didn’t make up her own names like J.K. Rowling did (Voldemort, Tonks, Mad eye Moody).

    Lastly, to the foolish fangirl who wrote in all capital letters, doesn’t that show your immaturity of the issue and how you cannot present a proper argument on the issue?

  1555. just a neutral girl :)
    Posted December 6, 2010 at 7:59 pm

    I agree with these points, but the points about the twi-hards are just a bit personal.
    Fair enough, I don\’t like it when people bash J.K Rowling or Jane Austen, but I would never bash a Twilight fan just because they enjoy a book/series, even though I personally cannot stand it really.
    I used to be a complete Twilight fan … I used to adore it so much, but then … I learnt that there\’s more to life than simply reading what is actually garbage … I suppose I was just jealous (as I also want to be an author).
    But then again, I think it\’s quite rude that you say that Twilight fans are idiots, I mean, some … possibly (actually definitely), but not all of them. I know a girl who really enjoys Twilight and who likes it because she finds comfort in it (God knows where though) and she\’s taking English Literature at A Level and she is getting increasingly good at it.
    So, my point is that you should not generalise the few idiotic and obsessive Twilight fans to the rest of them, some of them are extremely clever.

  1556. Anya
    Posted December 11, 2010 at 11:46 am

    True. Even Deedee from Dexter has more personality than Bella (and Edward). And let alone Harry, Hermione can take Edward.

  1557. penny
    Posted December 11, 2010 at 4:26 pm

    are you silly?twilight is a very romantic book.i think you have got a really really small brain because you can’t understand twilight.please ty to read the books again and don’t think bad thinks while you are reading the book.ı am sure you will be a twilight lover. I LOVE TWİLİGHT!!!!!!!!!!

  1558. Anastasia
    Posted December 11, 2010 at 10:08 pm

    i read the series twice simply because my friends were obsessed with it.
    at first i thought it was ok and actually kinda lliked it but after reading it the second time i decided to get rid of the books! i could not bear reading them again! the only reason why girls like twilight so much is because of rob pattinson who is as ugly as hell.
    now i dont want to judge meyer and her boring style of writing… i mean like she’s clearly isn’t brilliant and wasn’t heard of before twilight. but my main ppoint is, i don’t want to say that she was wrong when she imagined the vampires her own way.
    each author has a right to their own story line with its own characters. who said vampires have to be bloodsucking monsters with massive fangs? if you do some research on the internet on vampirism you’ll see the anyone can be a vampire because there are different types of vampires around. take emotional vampires as an example… they simply suck the strenght out of you without even knowing it! of course there are some freaks who drink blood as well and tend to increase their fangs by simply going to the dentist.
    to me the series was too boring and higly predictable. i dint like the storyline that much, and thought the ending was too good to be true, if you know what i mean. there was no serious action throughout the story involving some sort of blood and guts kind of thing.
    oh and the other thing, since bella is a teenager, shouldn’t she like curse or swear from time to time, at least in her own head? i mean like if i got a papercut i’d probably say something like “ah crap, i got a friggin papercut!!!” her language was too perfect, not like any human would have.

  1559. Posted December 13, 2010 at 12:02 am

    Thanks for all the comments, especially from you hardcore Twilight fans who took this very seriously and flamed this article saying what an idiot I was for not being madly in love with Edward’s abs and with Stephanie Meyers’ blatant abuse of the thesaurus and her crap writing skills.

    And from those who understood the purpose of the article was not to be taken seriously and found it humorous or otherwise amusing. And, of course, from everyone else who posted.

    This article was written as an illiterate joke (much like the Twilight series), even though I do hate the books with a passion, and I find it kind of hilarious that it has generated over 1,000 comments and over $250 for me.

    Please, haters, keep on hatin’.

    :)

  1560. Kyla (ky-sta)
    Posted December 14, 2010 at 4:56 am

    you forgot to mention that it is baiscaly a story about a girl who wants to choose between beastiality and negophelia! (pleae exuse my bad spelling)

    (secretly inside i’m hoping the books i write arnt this bad but i keep them at a two book maximum, my characters actually have personalitys, though my main characters can really kick but i try and make flaws (not just “oh, i’m clumbsy and i think i look ugly though no one else does”). but i think as long as i stay away from sparkley men i’ll be fine =D

  1561. Kyla (ky-sta)
    Posted December 14, 2010 at 5:08 am

    By the way i just want to add that i actually dont mind the books. it’s not the best writing in the world though bella does seem a little dull and incompetent.
    i really do not like the movies. most of the books are bellas thoughts so the movies are slow. (plus sorry Robert Patterson fans but he looks like hes been hit in the face with a shovel (his nose is just SO FLAT!!!!))
    and the biggest put off is the craze. i tend to start gdisliking things when the craze gets to much.

    i believe people have the right to think book characters are goodlooking and with they had one as long as it’s not obsessive because if he was reall he would run a mile as that would make you a stalker.

    and yes everyone is entiled to their own oppinon.

    i find this really funny reading all the major twi fans and twi haters! IT IS A BOOK PEOPLE. it’s not the end of the world. stop obsessing on the over exadurated positives and the obvious negitives. evrything has negatives.

    (forgive me matildah:) i cant name one book i cant find a flaw in (storywise anyway i’m dislexic so spelling and grsmmer goes over my head)

    i find everything her so funny kuz it’s all so silly =D

  1562. My Name is Éowyn
    Posted December 15, 2010 at 6:13 pm

    Okay. Whilst I am a vehement hater of the books, and whilst I admit that (to my mind, at least) your reasons are generally correct, I must say that you would have made a greater impression if you had: 1 – not spread single reasons over several answers, and 2 – explained your answers more thoroughly.
    On the up side, however, I must say that I agree with you. Even though I’m not biased against Twilight – I just think the books are terrible. That’s my honest opinion.
    And those of you who love Twilight, I have nothing against you, either – but it might make everyone a lot happier if you did not comment negatively on “I Hate Twilight” forums, and instead comment positively on “I Love Twilight” forums. Vent your anger that way :)

  1563. Intrigued Person
    Posted December 20, 2010 at 9:35 am

    I disliked Twilight for some of these reasons, but I think you got a little repetitive in others.
    The thing I notice when I surf the web looking at people who rant about why they hate Harry Potter (one of my favorite book series) is that a lot of the reason are non-related to the actual material in the books or not true. When I look at Twilight haters, most reasons are pretty honest and you can usually tell that person read the books.
    Thanks for speaking your opinion in such an honest way.
    To Twilight fans: I hold nothing against you, I just don’t enjoy the books or movies.

  1564. Posted December 20, 2010 at 3:47 pm

    This article has been GRABBED by The Triond Experiment Thanks and goodluck!

  1565. Michelle
    Posted December 21, 2010 at 12:25 am

    I like Twilight but still found this hysterical!

  1566. Posted December 23, 2010 at 2:46 am

    HEY! I want to begin by saying that Twilight does not ‘SUCK’, for by saying that we are just rooting on the vampire theme that is all but righteous. I must also express that we must not dis Ms. Stephenie Meyer for writing such a ‘book’ that is extremely unacceptable to the sane mind, because remember- it was purposely written for teenagers- who are not sane to begin with. I am sure Miss Meyer’s main idea was to simply express through her books that we all have a romeo out there, our “better half” to one day be united with, only in a very boring and distasteful way. Why does everything have to end in divorce?
    Please to not blame this hard-working, overpaid, and over commercialized author for the insane rampages that teenage and crazy alone and depressed female wannabees shout through “Team Edward” T-shirts and “I’m Not Afraid Of The Big Bad Wolf” pins. It’s not HER fault. I suggest that we simply declare that her monster of a series should be accepted, and behind and beyond the uproar of Twilight and Saga “fans” who crowd the streets screaming for every creepy/slightly constipated pale guy to bite them and suspect ‘that maybe that Native guy that just walked by was actually a mammoth sized Werewolf’, we are silently and respectfully burning the gas soaked books we thought might be worth reading because everyone else was buying them- with our heads bowed in sorrow that we are now experiencing what our future generation is going to look like. Vampires and Werewolves people- vampires, Werewolves, and The Bieb’s. Oh dear Lord, i PRAY, but am afraid it is too late.

    Also Bella was super insane and creepy.

  1567. Meitte The REALITY CHECK
    Posted December 23, 2010 at 3:12 am

    First of all we all know we dislike these books/movies because we ALL have seen/read them.

    It is not a good adult book, but it is not the end of the world. It is also not the author or the book that makes us mad. What really makes us want to throw these paperback harebrained creations off the edge of the earth is that everyone is making such a big deal out of it, and YES- particularly our teenagers. But what is wrong with a little imagination? All our kids want to believe is that they are unique, that there is someone out there waiting for them, someone special and strong and handsome. Kids are adventurous and stupid- so let them be that way! If you encounter a dream-filled girl who wants to believe or intrigue themselves in something that is as harmless as your friendly neighborhood Spider-man, let them. Somewhere they know Vampires are not real, but they love the story. It’s like being an Avatar fan, or a Trekie, just less serious and more annoying.

    Please give our kids and the book a break.

    And yes I agree the character Bella… and maybe even the actress herself… is a little eerie and on the down side of life.

  1568. Miette The REALITY CHECK
    Posted December 23, 2010 at 3:43 am

    Also- sorry- but I actually just read a few more of the responses… yikes. You know girls? my young daughters actually showed me this sight and I just wanted to get something in so people wouldn’t tease you so much. People are upset because of unruly responses like that, and you are now exposing my children to such inappropriate nonsense. Please stop. This is really all harmless -EVERYONE- and kind of funny, so don’t make a war out of something so innocent.

  1569. Posted December 23, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    Look at all the Twilight lovers with no lives raging over an article. They probably took an entire hour writing their useless comments, haha. Nice once! Twilight sucks (-_-)

  1570. Posted December 24, 2010 at 5:31 pm

    Wow! What a fantastic list. So complete.

    I haven’t read any of the books, but I have enjoyed the movies. Personally, I enjoy watching stories like this type of story play out in a visual way. I’d probably be extremely bored reading the books.

    I like the fact that so far there hasn’t been crude language and sex scenes in the “Twilight” movies. Too many movies rely on sex, bloody violence and crude language to sell more tickets.

    Maybe, Twilight is elementary, but I personally enjoy the on-screen story and the visual effects used in the telling of the story in the movie series. Like I’ve already said, the book would probably bore the heck out of me.

    I do think that the Harry Potter movies are way better than the Twilight series. The story is deeper and has more meat to the story. Of course, Harry Potter apparently had been written in such a way, that it would attract not only teenage girls and boys, but many full grown adults, too.

    Twilight and Harry Potter really can’t be compared side-by-side, because they both target completely different audiences. One had been made for a niche demographic and the other for a very broad demographic.

    The authors are also completely different in their writing and story-telling talents. One author being compared to a grade school grammar teacher and the other author compared to a college professor. I’ll leave it up to the next reader to determine, which is which.

    Great review. The best review that I have read all decade.

    Sincerely,

    Nelson Doyle

  1571. Posted December 27, 2010 at 4:31 am

    hilarious. that is all i can say. it is so funny that i dont feel the need to be grammatically correct in my comment because it is so far down the line that few if anyone will make it by this comment. but truly hilarious.

  1572. Emily
    Posted January 4, 2011 at 3:16 am

    I totally agee with all of this. And I feel reallly sorry for Stephanie Meyer’s husband. She obviosly wants him to be her Edward. That will never happen and she knows it! Stephanie Meyer is desperate! I mean, wishing she was bella and him edward…

    I also hate twilight becuse I was team jacob. Bello would be much better off with a guy who really loves her and actually protects her. Unlike Edward who’s a peadophile, 109 year old virgin and night time stalker. Not a good example for 11 year olds who read it and think thats love.
    Which is why Twilight ultimatly sucks bad. I know that. And I’m only 13!

  1573. Miss Amy
    Posted January 5, 2011 at 12:42 am

    I’d like to make a(n)-quite possibly- impossible request: can we all stop hating on each other?

    I adore Harry Potter and used to be quite fond of Twilight, it’s not a horrible thing, is it? Stephanie Meyer got teens to read more because of it, you know. And even if it causes them to obsess uncontrollably over it, at least they’re reading more.

    Let’s not attack the author of this list, or the Twilight series, or it’s fans or haters, because of how they feel- at the end of the day, it’s only your own opinions that matter to you, right? And, okay, go ahead and hate Twilight if you insist, but give logical reasons for it. ‘It’s stupid’ just doesn’t cut it anymore, guys. It probably won’t even be popular years from now- argue if you will, but the fandom is already dying, so don’t even worry about it.

    I, personally, say we should all have peace.

    Make love, not war. (or horcruxes).
    Ta, now.

  1574. twiluver
    Posted January 5, 2011 at 3:34 am

    omg lmfao liek i luuuuv edward and bella liek sooo i <3 them sooo much u ppl sux kthxbai

  1575. Posted January 5, 2011 at 8:45 pm

    The best article I have ever read

  1576. I don't even like twilight.
    Posted January 7, 2011 at 6:03 am

    I’ve read the books, I think their alright. I have no problem bashing them or realizing how unrealistic and unoriginal the plot is. My problem with this post is that you have zero valid arguments against it. Your talking about how unrealistic it is but then saying how Harry Potter would kick Edwards ass, but neither are real so… yeah. At least Stephanie Meyer is doing something with her life other than sitting and making a list about how bad a book is on the internet. That they have obviously taken the time to read, no matter what you say your reasoning was. Your being unoriginal because most of your reasons were stolen in the first place. Why do you care about other people’s correct usage of grammar on the internet…? And this whole article was a waste of time, if you hate twilight so much you would just ignore it your feeding the fire. So all in all your a stupid, next time you want to insult something at least have good reason.

  1577. Misty
    Posted January 9, 2011 at 4:01 pm

    I have to say, I read all of the books & I’ve seen the movies. The books are okay. I like the movies better. I don’t have a problem with people voicing their opinions & I actually read through these and thought they were pretty funny. And how you go to lengths to include so many references to Facebook, I guess you’re just a Facebook junkie like we are all Twilight “junkies” lol! Although I don’t think you should criticize the writer like you did because honestly she’s probably made more money off of these books than you’ll ever see in your life.So you really made yourself look kind of like an idiot because now people can say, you’re just pissed off that Stephanie Meyer has a career, family, money & is doing something with herself and you’re not. It is expected though for people to insult writers & books so go ahead. I just thought you would like to know I found some of these reasons pretty funny & some are repeated just reworded lol.

  1578. Elena
    Posted January 12, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    Well , whoever you are I don’t really care if u have the rights to express ur opinions then so do I . I can answer your every point I mean it
    1 some people are clumsy okay if u can’t understand it , it’s not here problem
    2 Oh cmon ur such a critcizing person 3 if she can’t do anything wid anything abt edward how was she living her life earlier???
    Well i could have typed as much as i have want bt m busy
    So i ll many ppl lyk twilight and i don’t need vampire powers to ……. You r a harry potter lover so u critcize twilight bcoz it’s better and u need to prove it’snt . You totally don’t like Bella going wid Edward u want her to go with Jacob
    It’s Meyers creativity not urs ok
    And it’s fiction everheard of dat word duh romeo and juliet fiction y did they die they cold have been united shakespare’s wish his creation Ok get it Or u want more…………

  1579. guardian921
    Posted January 13, 2011 at 6:15 am

    I work part time as a school bus aide helping kids on and off of the buses. In the past two years I have worked with students ranging from preschoolers to high school seniors, a majority of which are either Twilight fans willingly or are being raised with Twilight by their parents.

    I am sad to report that practically all of the Twilight fans I have met actually believe that Vampires are suppose to sparkle in the sunlight and that they can be out in the sun. One of my students had to read a classical book for a report, and since Twilight wasn’t considered classical literature, decided to read Dracula as it was a vampire book. Once on the bus she began to complain that:
    “That Stroker guy doesn’t know the first thing about vampires. Can you believe that he had his vampires explode when in the sun? Phsssh… as if! And there’s no way stabbing a twig in his heart is gonna kill him! You need to tear them limb from limb to kill a vampire. Duh!”

    When I explained that Stroker based his Dracula off of the traditional vampire lore, she and the other students just stared at me like I had lost my mind. Seeing as I have been reading monster stories since I was 4, I shared with them all I knew of traditional monster lore, from the Chinese Hopping Vampire to the superstitious signs of a werewolf. I’m sad to say that none of the kids believed me, say for one boy and that was because he had a crush on me.

    That is why the main reason I despise Twilight so much is because children nowadays rely on it for their monster lore and do not bother checking up on the originals. in the name of profit, Stephanie Meyer has murdered the classic and traditional folklore that once captured the hearts of many and for that I shall never allow Twilight into my household.

  1580. Brandi
    Posted January 14, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    First I would like to ask if you even read the book or did you just watch the movie.

    1. The other students found Bella attractive because she was new. Forks has a population of 3120 people. There are not many girls to pick from. Also she was somewhat mysterious.

    2. Edward only saves her 2 times in the first book. Once from a van sliding on black ice and almost taking her out. Wouldn’t you like somewhat to save you if a van sliding at god knows how many mph was sliding towards you. The second time is from James, but she put herself in that situation because she was attempting to save her mother.

    3. As for her father, it clearly states that Bella and her father were not very close and like to keep to themselves. If you had children, you would probably get that.

    4. She does not try to kill herself, she sees Edward in her mind when she is doing something dangerous. After the cliff dive she was smiling, not upset that she was killed

    5. Finally, anyone who agrees to what Stephen King says should have their head examined. He is sick and twisted and makes sick and twisted books.

    6. If you do not like reading the series or watching the movies, then don’t. But putting people down for what they enjoy just makes you a hate monger and you should change your name to Malcom X.

  1581. death scythe
    Posted January 20, 2011 at 7:10 am

    I liked The 83th (I like death note too)

    if you like vampire then you have to read bakemonogatari Japanese light novels especially kizumonogatari

  1582. ADH
    Posted January 25, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    I enjoyed these reasons and found them to be rather funny. But, what people seem to miss is the fact that these are her reasons as to why she hates Twilight. Not yours. Not your moms. Just hers. Now, besides that, if you can’t laugh at your own fandom, then what kind of fan are you? A fanatic. And a maybe slightly psycho one at that.

  1583. Lethvienne
    Posted January 25, 2011 at 3:34 pm

    Um. That really makes no sense. If the Volturi had learned about Bella’s potential through Edward’s mind, then how is it that Edward was just as surprised as Bella when that other vampire (I forget his name), called her a ’shield’? Edward clearly hadn’t known what she could do then, so the Volturi couldn’t have seen it in his mind.

    Also, in the last confrontation with the Volturi, they hadn’t known right away that Bella was shielding her allies from mental attacks. They only learned that later, when the Witch Twins’ abilities failed to have any effect on the Cullens and their allies. So, no, the Volturi were not infatuated with Bella and certainly not for her potential.

    As far as Bella being the most powerful vampire to ever exist, are you completely off your rocker? She can block mental attacks, nothing more – to a great extent, yes, but that doesn’t exactly make her some Super Vampire. Not even close. Most other vampires whose powers and strength don’t rely solely on mental attacks would rip Bella apart. Easily. The books were in NO WAY about Bella being so ‘uber’ powerful. It was about her and Edward, like, being so, like, totally, like, in love with each other, like OMG.

    Complete rubbish. And yes, if you haven’t been able to tell thus far, I have read the books. I read them only so I could hate them in a more informed context. Being able to refute people like you is also a bonus. I’ve always thought it’s never wise to hate on something unless you’ve experienced it and can understand it. Otherwise why bother?

    To make it abundantly clear . . . I HATE TWILIGHT!!!! MWA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!

  1584. Briony
    Posted January 26, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    I read this because my friends were obsessed with it.

    As a student of advanced English Literature who does reports on Chaucer, I regretted every single page. There is no beauty to the lexis, or complexity. It is a great shame so many are entertained so much by something so simplistic and unoriginal.

    I may as well have read one of those airy romance novels. It’s got about as much substance.

    Excuse me while I scrub off the faecal matter burned into the backs of my eyes. It’s getting rather irksome.

  1585. 5u21
    Posted January 27, 2011 at 12:09 am

    Twilight Series Story is so Annoying and Ridiculous.
    First of all Stephanie Meyer Killed the Fantasy of Vampires turning to Dust in the Sunlight, instead they Glow, she didnt make her Vampires have Fangs (How are they going to Drink Blood?).
    And also How can she have Bella Choose Edward over her Parents, that’s just Wrong. How can someone choose to out live their Family, I can never imagine out living my Family, specially my Mom, I can never choose a Guy over my Mom, let alone my whole Family.
    Bella Loved 2 Guys, Edward and Jacob, she chose Edward cause she Loved him More, but she also Loved Jacob, I would Choose Jacob, first of all she loves him too and also she wouldnt even have to become a Vampire to be with him and will not have to live without her Family. Its so Stupid, plus who would choose to be a Vampire anyway, oh wait, Twilight Fanatics, mainly Team Edward.
    Stephanie Highlights Love between a Guy and a Girl and the story ends with the Girl choosing to be with the guy over her family, so I’m guessing Stephanie doesn’t see the Love between Parents and their Children as strong as the love between two individual boy and Girl, I’ve fallen for a Guy Big Time and we were 2 different people and knew my mom wouldn’t go for it, you see I can never choose any guy over my mom, I just don’t like the story and it just doesnt show the strength of Family Bond.

  1586. Posted January 28, 2011 at 7:19 am

    This article is epic. Hilarious!

  1587. Ashley
    Posted January 29, 2011 at 11:15 am

    The Twilight books and films are stupid and overrated. Bella has absolutley NO personality, Edward is controlling and a wimp and Jacob is a puchy obnoxious jerk. The characters in the movie act CONSTIPATED and the whole series is cliche. True Blood, The Vampire Diaries and Ann Rice are way better. People are wasting their whole lives worshiping this horrible piece of literiture.
    Agree with you %110!

  1588. super super
    Posted January 30, 2011 at 9:34 am

    this list is hilarious and worth reading but yeah, if you hate twilight so much, why did you have to exhaust yourself, writing up 95 reasons, researching about it and even interviewing street people who obviously don’t care:]?
    just saying

  1589. Emma Lyn
    Posted February 6, 2011 at 4:04 pm

    If you are to blab on about Twilight, I think you need to look at it from an unbiased point of view. These flame wars have all mangled your opinions and fed them to camels.
    What I find funny, hilarious even, is that fans try to look for lists like these just to defend it with everything they have in those messed up little brains of theirs (just kidding). And what is funnier is that I could prove this. I, personally, think this list is made for stating why she hates Twilight, and NOT why you should. Its meant to entertain and relate to the Anti- Twlighters like me.
    Well, first, why do we even bother? We have opinions, thats why (and it also helps that this book has gotten really popular. We people with no lives at least need something to do.) Its human nature to think differently and argue. And, besides, its SO DAMN FUN!
    But Im digressing.
    Have you even thought that it could not only be teenage girls, but boys and girls who arent even in fifth grade yet commenting,”ZOHMUHGOODNESS, u suk 4 hatin TWIliGHT!
    Edward (SWOON) is the most PERFCT< KIND, BEAUTIFUL, MORE AWESOME THEN YULL EVAR BE YOU *CENSORED* *CENSORED* * CENSORED*!!!!!11! "
    -Note: This is a real quote taken from some website I cant remember. Just shows how horrible my memory is, huh? Some things may have been changed.
    I read the books. Theyre boring, predictable, they have no plot, which is weird considering the series has plot holes big enough to fit the whole town of Forks in there. But theyre great for a light read, if you dont cringe in disgust at the cheesy lines, grammatical errors, horrible character development, bland taste of sequences, pages- no, chapters of mindless descriptions and blech, unnecessary events, pointless conversations, anticlimactic fight scenes (theres not really much action in this book to be honest), unhealthy messages, and spending hours reading of Edwards perfect chest, perfect voice, perfect face, perfect backside, and etc.
    What I do like is that theyre (the vampires) perfect in a sense, but not perfect in another. Theyve got powers, money, influence, and looks, but they have to live with the guilt of knowing theyre a danger to every living thing around them (except maybe plants).
    What I also see is that Bella is a teen living her life for others and not herself (Really! What does she have to live for?) and so is Edward. They find love in another person that understands their, er, situation (but you know, it didnt have to be such a sadistic relationship nor did they really have to fall in love that quickly.)
    Instead of falling deeply in love in the first book then spending the next two solving minor problems that really arent problems if Bella could just keep her hormones in check, she couldve had them become close friends in the first one, fall in love in the second one (because I see no solid reason for New Moon other than introducing the Volturi), solve their problems in the third, and this is where Breaking Dawn comes into the picture.
    STORY TIME
    One day, at a Borders location somewhere in the southwest, the Twilight books were on display.
    I said to my friend, What Twilight?\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"
    She replied, quote, A stupid book series about vampires and romance, and all that crap. end quote
    I was confuddled. I walked to the stand. I read the back. I burst out laughing.
    quote Why is something like this so popular? It sounds like a fanfiction an eighth grader wouldve written, if not worse. end quote
    quote know, its trash right? Its funny how the fangirls attack if you just ask, Whats Twilight? end quote
    Three-ish-maybe-ish hours later…
    I hear three teens talking about it.
    quote Whos Edward Cullen? end quote
    And then they caused me temporary physical damage and hearing loss.
    With that, I conclude my rant. Good day.

  1590. Emma Lyn
    Posted February 6, 2011 at 4:04 pm

    If you are to blab on about Twilight, I think you need to look at it from an unbiased point of view. These flame wars have all mangled your opinions and fed them to camels.
    What I find funny, hilarious even, is that fans try to look for lists like these just to defend it with everything they have in those messed up little brains of theirs (just kidding). And what is funnier is that I could prove this. I, personally, think this list is made for stating why she hates Twilight, and NOT why you should. Its meant to entertain and relate to the Anti- Twlighters like me.
    Well, first, why do we even bother? We have opinions, thats why (and it also helps that this book has gotten really popular. We people with no lives at least need something to do.) Its human nature to think differently and argue. And, besides, its SO DAMN FUN!
    But Im digressing.
    Have you even thought that it could not only be teenage girls, but boys and girls who arent even in fifth grade yet commenting,\”ZOHMUHGOODNESS, u suk 4 hatin TWIliGHT!
    Edward (SWOON) is the most PERFCT< KIND, BEAUTIFUL, MORE AWESOME THEN YULL EVAR BE YOU *CENSORED* *CENSORED* * CENSORED*!!!!!11! \"
    -Note: This is a real quote taken from some website I cant remember. Just shows how horrible my memory is, huh? Some things may have been changed.
    I read the books. Theyre boring, predictable, they have no plot, which is weird considering the series has plot holes big enough to fit the whole town of Forks in there. But theyre great for a light read, if you dont cringe in disgust at the cheesy lines, grammatical errors, horrible character development, bland taste of sequences, pages- no, chapters of mindless descriptions and blech, unnecessary events, pointless conversations, anticlimactic fight scenes (theres not really much action in this book to be honest), unhealthy messages, and spending hours reading of Edwards perfect chest, perfect voice, perfect face, perfect backside, and etc.
    What I do like is that theyre (the vampires) perfect in a sense, but not perfect in another. Theyve got powers, money, influence, and looks, but they have to live with the guilt of knowing theyre a danger to every living thing around them (except maybe plants).
    What I also see is that Bella is a teen living her life for others and not herself (Really! What does she have to live for?) and so is Edward. They find love in another person that understands their, er, situation (but you know, it didnt have to be such a sadistic relationship nor did they really have to fall in love that quickly.)
    Instead of falling deeply in love in the first book then spending the next two solving minor problems that really arent problems if Bella could just keep her hormones in check, she couldve had them become close friends in the first one, fall in love in the second one (because I see no solid reason for New Moon other than introducing the Volturi), solve their problems in the third, and this is where Breaking Dawn comes into the picture.
    STORY TIME
    One day, at a Borders location somewhere in the southwest, the Twilight books were on display.
    I said to my friend, Whats Twilight? end quote
    She replied, quote, A stupid book series about vampires and romance, and all that crap. end quote
    I was confuddled. I walked to the stand. I read the back. I burst out laughing.
    quote Why is something like this so popular? It sounds like a fanfiction an eighth grader wouldve written, if not worse. end quote
    quote know, its trash right? Its funny how the fangirls attack if you just ask, Whats Twilight? end quote
    Three-ish-maybe-ish hours later…
    I hear three teens talking about it.
    quote Whos Edward Cullen? end quote
    And then they caused me temporary physical damage and hearing loss.
    With that, I conclude my rant. Good day.

  1591. Emma Lyn
    Posted February 6, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    If you are to blab on about Twilight, I think you need to look at it from an unbiased point of view. These flame wars have all mangled your opinions and fed them to camels.
    What I find funny, hilarious even, is that fans try to look for lists like these just to defend it with everything they have in those messed up little brains of theirs (just kidding). And what is funnier is that I could prove this. I, personally, think this list is made for stating why she hates Twilight, and NOT why you should. Its meant to entertain and relate to the Anti- Twlighters like me.
    Well, first, why do we even bother? We have opinions, thats why (and it also helps that this book has gotten really popular. We people with no lives at least need something to do.) Its human nature to think differently and argue. And, besides, its SO DAMN FUN!
    But Im digressing.
    Have you even thought that it could not only be teenage girls, but boys and girls who arent even in fifth grade yet commenting,ZOHMUHGOODNESS, u suk 4 hatin TWIliGHT!
    Edward (SWOON) is the most PERFCT< KIND, BEAUTIFUL, MORE AWESOME THEN YULL EVAR BE YOU *CENSORED* *CENSORED* * CENSORED*!!!!!11!
    -Note: This is a real quote taken from some website I cant remember. Just shows how horrible my memory is, huh? Some things may have been changed.
    I read the books. Theyre boring, predictable, they have no plot, which is weird considering the series has plot holes big enough to fit the whole town of Forks in there. But theyre great for a light read, if you dont cringe in disgust at the cheesy lines, grammatical errors, horrible character development, bland taste of sequences, pages- no, chapters of mindless descriptions and blech, unnecessary events, pointless conversations, anticlimactic fight scenes (theres not really much action in this book to be honest), unhealthy messages, and spending hours reading of Edwards perfect chest, perfect voice, perfect face, perfect backside, and etc.
    What I do like is that theyre (the vampires) perfect in a sense, but not perfect in another. Theyve got powers, money, influence, and looks, but they have to live with the guilt of knowing theyre a danger to every living thing around them (except maybe plants).
    What I also see is that Bella is a teen living her life for others and not herself (Really! What does she have to live for?) and so is Edward. They find love in another person that understands their, er, situation (but you know, it didnt have to be such a sadistic relationship nor did they really have to fall in love that quickly.)
    Instead of falling deeply in love in the first book then spending the next two solving minor problems that really arent problems if Bella could just keep her hormones in check, she couldve had them become close friends in the first one, fall in love in the second one (because I see no solid reason for New Moon other than introducing the Volturi), solve their problems in the third, and this is where Breaking Dawn comes into the picture.
    STORY TIME
    One day, at a Borders location somewhere in the southwest, the Twilight books were on display.
    I said to my friend, Whats Twilight? end quote
    She replied, quote, A stupid book series about vampires and romance, and all that crap. end quote
    I was confuddled. I walked to the stand. I read the back. I burst out laughing.
    quote Why is something like this so popular? It sounds like a fanfiction an eighth grader wouldve written, if not worse. end quote
    quote know, its trash right? Its funny how the fangirls attack if you just ask, Whats Twilight? end quote
    Three-ish-maybe-ish hours later…
    I hear three teens talking about it.
    quote Whos Edward Cullen? end quote
    And then they caused me temporary physical damage and hearing loss.
    With that, I conclude my rant. Good day.

  1592. Emma Lyn
    Posted February 6, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    If you are to blab on about Twilight, I think you need to look at it from an unbiased point of view. These flame wars have all mangled your opinions and fed them to camels.
    What I find funny, hilarious even, is that fans try to look for lists like these just to defend it with everything they have in those messed up little brains of theirs (just kidding). And what is funnier is that I could prove this. I, personally, think this list is made for stating why she hates Twilight, and NOT why you should. Its meant to entertain and relate to the Anti- Twlighters like me.
    Well, first, why do we even bother? We have opinions, thats why (and it also helps that this book has gotten really popular. We people with no lives at least need something to do.) Its human nature to think differently and argue. And, besides, its SO DAMN FUN!
    But Im digressing.
    I read the books. Theyre boring, predictable, they have no plot, which is weird considering the series has plot holes big enough to fit the whole town of Forks in there. But theyre great for a light read, if you dont cringe in disgust at the cheesy lines, grammatical errors, horrible character development, bland taste of sequences, pages- no, chapters of mindless descriptions and blech, unnecessary events, pointless conversations, anticlimactic fight scenes (theres not really much action in this book to be honest), unhealthy messages, and spending hours reading of Edwards perfect chest, perfect voice, perfect face, perfect backside, and etc.
    What I do like is that theyre (the vampires) perfect in a sense, but not perfect in another. Theyve got powers, money, influence, and looks, but they have to live with the guilt of knowing theyre a danger to every living thing around them (except maybe plants).
    What I also see is that Bella is a teen living her life for others and not herself (Really! What does she have to live for?) and so is Edward. They find love in another person that understands their, er, situation (but you know, it didnt have to be such a sadistic relationship nor did they really have to fall in love that quickly.)
    Instead of falling deeply in love in the first book then spending the next two solving minor problems that really arent problems if Bella could just keep her hormones in check, she couldve had them become close friends in the first one, fall in love in the second one (because I see no solid reason for New Moon other than introducing the Volturi), solve their problems in the third, and this is where Breaking Dawn comes into the picture.
    STORY TIME
    One day, at a Borders location somewhere in the southwest, the Twilight books were on display.
    I said to my friend, Whats Twilight? end quote
    She replied, quote, A stupid book series about vampires and romance, and all that crap. end quote
    I was confuddled. I walked to the stand. I read the back. I burst out laughing.
    quote Why is something like this so popular? It sounds like a fanfiction an eighth grader wouldve written, if not worse. end quote
    quote know, its trash right? Its funny how the fangirls attack if you just ask, Whats Twilight? end quote
    Three-ish-maybe-ish hours later…
    I hear three teens talking about it.
    quote Whos Edward Cullen? end quote
    And then they caused me temporary physical damage and hearing loss.
    With that, I conclude my rant. Good day.

  1593. JHAKIE
    Posted February 6, 2011 at 4:10 pm

    P.S:Note to the people who are commenting with,”Why do you spend your empty lives commenting on this crap? Do you have anything else to attend to?”
    I’d like to point out that you are also commenting on this. So, by commenting that we are wasting time by commenting, you are commenting yourself, which makes you a hypocrite, and everything else that your commenting comment commented about commenting that you commented. I’d also like to comment that if you are doing that, it then cancels out the commenting comment, so there is really no need for you to comment anything about commenting since you are basically not just commenting on everyone else’s comments,but your own commenting comments as well.
    Confused? So am I, kind of.

  1594. Twilight Fan
    Posted February 11, 2011 at 6:10 am

    “You are allowed to have your own opinion, just like we are allowed to have ours.”

    And a few seconds later…

    “Light Yagami doesn’t approve of Twilight so neither should you”

    Congratulations. You just double-standard yourself.

    And what are you trying to say? You think I’m insane and an idiot just because I happen to enjoy the books? No, it is not “Harry Potter”, “Lord of the Rings” or anything like that. Yes, it does have some problems with the continuation, the “Mary Sueness” etc. but I DID enjoy them. I see them as a “guilty pleasure”, something I can read to satisfy my “teenage hormones”, not as a literature value thing. I’m sorry that I’m not as smart, or as critical or as perfect as you are.. But I am in no way insane or stupid. And, like the previous poster said, you ARE wasting time commenting on this.

    Basically your attitude is; “Twilight sucks and you suck for liking it!”

  1595. Posted February 11, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    OMG how would you even know if you hate for 1 thing if you read it for real you would know bella did NOT try to commit suicide she was having fun with Jacob 2nd of course she realting to her own life why not you know how many other authors do that and do they get all this hate!!!!3rd of all ,if you hate it so much why do you even bother making this damn list get a life seriously I like what I like and vise verse 4th of all she didnt teach to let the man handle it like I said read the book you ignorant tard you know how much she did for the people she loved she saved them in Breaking Dawn if it wasn’t for her the Cullens and the wolf pack would all die and 5th reason why this list as usefull as a screen door on a submarine :/ of course the rules are being broken thats whats so dangerous about the realtionship between Edward and Bella they are breaking All of the rules by being together DUH!!!!!! like I said READ THE DAMN BOOK!!!!!!!!! You know I could go on and on about how Absurd and Damn WRONG you are but that could take a while so I’ll just one more thing Stop hating you………….. Wow I cant think of a bad enough word so I ill just say this I hope Emmett bites your head off

  1596. Posted February 13, 2011 at 6:05 am

    Everyone is wasting their time. Fools. I’d rather study for a chem quiz.

  1597. Posted February 13, 2011 at 6:05 am

    Everyone is wasting their time. Fools. I\’d rather study for a chem quiz.

  1598. Amy Green
    Posted February 14, 2011 at 3:01 pm

    this article is SOO right. i agree totally. Twilight is so stupid!

  1599. Amy Green
    Posted February 14, 2011 at 3:05 pm

    if you love twilight, THEN WHY ARE YOU READING A LIST ABOUT HOW WE HATE IT????

  1600. Renee
    Posted February 16, 2011 at 8:47 pm

    Well, for people who just hate twilight y’all really spend alot of trash talking it.If you read the books you would see that it is a wonderful series.If you have nothing nice to say don’t say it all.If you all got a JOB!!and a life!!I wonder how many times y’all watched the movies and read the books to write sssooooooo much about it.

  1601. Helen
    Posted February 21, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    OMG u guys are so right
    i mean i read the whole series but only cause i was hoping it would get better in the end..
    and my friends told me to…
    i agree on all 95 points…
    lol:)

  1602. Posted February 21, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    Most of your arguments are invalid because they are a matter of opinion, not fact, or they are perceptions of facts that vary from person to person. I’m going to address some of my favorites of your other points, though.

    1) Bella is a perfect character

    She lies to her parents, constantly makes horrible decisions which are often dangerous, she’s so miserable she’d rather be dead as a vampire than live the rest of her human life, she’s a horrible friend and just generally treats people badly, and she often puts her own fulfillment before the needs or desires of others. How is she perfect again?

    4) When Edward leaves she tries to commit suicide.

    Again, this is a character you’re calling “perfect” and “flawless”?

    10) “Bella almost dies fifty thousand times, but Edward always saves her. This is boring.”

    Edward only saves Bella from actually dying once. Jacob saves her once. The wolf pack saves her once. Bella saves Edward’s life once. Bella saves everyone’s lives at the end of the series.

    11) Edward is too perfect and flawless

    Really? He hooks up with a human despite the dangers it poses to her, himself, his family, and his people. And, as you conflictingly point out later in #19, he’s extremely possessive and borderline abusive. He does things that are incredibly creepy, like watch her while she’s sleeping. How is this perfect?

    Frankly… your perception of Bella and Edward as “perfect” seems to have more to do with Bella not being into drugs and alcohol, and Edward not being into pre-marital sex. That’s disturbing, given the fact that you, yourself, point out that this book is read by children.

    12) “The reason the books became so popular is because Bella has no personality and any loser can put themselves in her shoes.”

    Are you so disgruntled with the youth of today that you would insult so many of them by calling them losers just for enjoying a book that you hated? How very sad!

    14) Bella teaches women to let the man handle everything, which pretty much is a huge step backward for women everywhere, who have fought for equality.

    Not true at all. Bella makes a lot of decisions on her own and frequently defies the wishes of others, including Edward. She also single-handedly saves the day at the end of the series, with no help from Edward or anyone else.

    21) This book contains no real sex, so it’s not really a vampire novel.

    There is plenty of “real sex” in the final book. Not explicit enough for you? Well, that’s disturbing, given the fact that–again–you yourself admit that this book is read by children.

    22) Read Anne Rice – those are vampires, not the girly men that Meyer has created.

    To which I would counter: Read Bram Stoker. Period.

    25) She never uses the word fangs in the entire book series, and it’s supposedly about vampire.

    Why is it so important that every vampire novelist rip off every detail from every previous vampire novelist? What is so wrong with re-defining a genre? It’s a catch 22, because if she HAD ripped off every detail from every previous vampire novelist, this list would be all about how unoriginal, uncreative, and plagiaristic she is.

  1603. Posted February 21, 2011 at 4:17 pm

    34) People think Meyer is the best writer ever.

    Some people, maybe, but I doubt very highly that is an opinion they will maintain for any extended period of time. These people are also probably eleven. So who cares?

    39) They use a drug reference in a book written for ten-year-olds.

    Oh, but there wasn’t enough “real sex” in it for you???

    40) Stephen King agrees that Stephanie Meyer can’t write ‘worth a darn’.

    And a lot of people agree that Stephen King can’t write “worth a darn”.

    55) They fall in love way too quickly and it seems fake because no one falls in love instantly, especially teenagers.

    Have you ever actually been a teenager, by any chance? Also, do you know the difference between attraction, lust, and falling in love? They don’t actually “fall in love” until about 200 pages into the first book. So… that’s too fast for you?

    57) It’s just not healthy to teach young girls that True Love involves the guy watching you while you sleep.

    I actually agree with this on some level, however there are FAR worse examples of bad literary examples for teens, so you’re wasting your time by only lamenting this example.

    58) There’s something disturbing about Carlisle turning only teenagers into vampires.

    Only Edward, Alice, and Rosalee were under 20. Everyone else was over 20, and Carlilse himself was in his early 20’s.

    I can’t even keep going beyond that. Most of your arguments are so absurd, I’m actually bored to tears and am guessing you’re probably just too disgruntled to be logical, so I’m wasting my time anyway.

    Also, this web site SUCKS. It won’t even let me post further comments, so I have no idea if these are showing up or not.

  1604. Posted February 21, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    The post that was supposed to be in between my last two:

    27) Supposedly Meyer never uses the word ‘said’ in the entire first book, instead using breath.

    Twilight, Page 4 “Bella,” my mom said to me…

    Page 5 “It’s good to see you, Bells,” he said…

    Page 8 “I’m glad you like it,” Charlie said gruffly…

    I could keep going, or maybe you should check your facts first?

    And also, if she’d used “said” more often than she did, she would have taken crap for that, too.

    29) It’s predictable, and childish.

    It wasn’t meant to be “A Clockwork Orange”, now was it?

    30) We read the entire series just to laugh at the stupidity of it.

    How is this a reason to either hate or not read the series? Are you saying that because some people think the book is stupid, that everyone should adopt that opinion? You think people
    should be sheep and draw conclusions based on other people’s opinions and not through personal experience?

    31) Meyer can’t think of original names. The only original name she used was Rennesme, which is combination of two names and doesn’t count.

    Seriously? It’s not a book about Middle Earth! I can’t even imagine how much flack she would have taken if she’d used names like Briayllen Soglosten and Eearveryn Cularsnoffer.She actually used some relatively uncommon names–Jasper, Emmett, Carlisle, Seth, Rosalee, even Isabella isn’t that common. And how does Renesmee not count as original, just because it’s too names put together?

  1605. oki
    Posted February 22, 2011 at 11:30 am

    Jacob was nice to Bella? Psh, I just saw the third movie. Jacob forced Bella into asking him to kiss her by pitching a fit. What a whiny manipulative little bitch!

  1606. Nicole
    Posted February 25, 2011 at 12:22 am

    The main reason I was disappointed with Twilight:
    Most of the last book was the majority of the vampire population, as well as the werewolves, preparing for this all-out battle with the other half of the vampire population. Bella learns to control her powers and everybody learns to fight, all of which leading me to expect an exciting climax. But then they’re all on the ‘battlefield’ and they talk for a while…AND NOTHING HAPPENS!!!!
    More than 300 pages of very little plot then all of a sudden…nevermind, the end! :)
    The book ends quite suddenly as well, I felt like although all the major conflicts had been resolved there were still a lot of holes left.
    It was like Stephanie Meyer just got bored and ended the book as quickly as she could.

    Also…
    After finishing the series I realized that even though there were a number of dangerous battles and perilous situations, none of the ‘good guys’ died. And yes, I know that Harry Clearwater died, but he didn’t die in battle and he wasn’t a main character so I don’t include him.
    Part of what makes a goodbook is suspense, ie: ‘Oh no! What’s going to happen! Is she going to die! Who’s died! Gah!!!’ And reading Twilight is like this: ‘Mmmhmm…yeah. Oh, what a surprise, everybody’s okay. Hooray’ (You have to imagine an overly sarcastic tone).

  1607. Amy
    Posted March 6, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    Love the Deathnote reference

  1608. Sankhanil
    Posted March 9, 2011 at 2:43 am

    Some of you points are a matter of perspective but I do agree with your conclusion-”Twilight” is mundane and very badly written. There isn’t any dearth of good literature .People shouldn’t be wasting their time in this WORTHLESS piece of junk.
    P.S It seems that you have read the book observing every minor detail…..cannot imagine how you were able to achieve such a marvelous feat. Its almost like noting down every junk item in a huge garbage dump.

  1609. Brittany
    Posted March 16, 2011 at 6:29 am

    Obviously there are just your opinions. Okay fine. I don’t care if you don’t like the books.

    But just so you know, your opinions are about as sound as your dislike for Twilight. Ignorant.

  1610. Noah
    Posted March 24, 2011 at 12:27 am

    twilight? i stopped after the first book. the 2nd book haven’t touch. still collecting dust since two years ago? i don’t remember. the other two books? haven’t had any intention to buy yet. vampires? i would rather read darren shan’s series – both the vampire saga and demonata saga.

  1611. :)
    Posted March 26, 2011 at 7:43 am

    hehehe, lol, I read the books before all the hype and I thought they were good, but I agree totally on a few of your points especially about Bella as after the first page I wanted to punch her. Still I think the most annoying thing about the whole series is the fans… I mean WTF! they need to realise it is not real! and the haters are just as bad really, why can’t people see it’s just another trashy love story to be enjoyed! It’s not and never has been a great work of literature! Plus I wouldn’t say it was worse than Harry Potter, there are god knows how many flaws in that series and it is hardly ever Harry who saves the day. Neither Edward or Bella thinks about commiting suicide when they leave each other it is only when they think that the other is dead this happens (as in Romeo and Juliet – supposedly one of the greatest plays ever written), Bella doesn’t even think of killing herself in the whole series she only thinks it in terms of Edwards death (i.e. if Edward dies I will die too) and that she wants to be with him forever, and if you had a chance to be with the one you loved forever would you not take it? There are thousands of other trashy books out there, which teenagers and adults read, this book isn’t complete crap and I think both haters and lovers need to understand is that Meyer wasn’t writing a literary master peice; she was writing a story.

  1612. twilightmustdie
    Posted April 1, 2011 at 2:03 am

    i totally agree with the author’s rant! mad props to you ma’am! you have basically said every little miniscule detail that i hated about twilight! bravo and encoure please!!!
    for those of you who are bashing this wonderful person, you can suck it up! sure, there are those that bash twilight maybe a tad bit far. but i say not far enough! there are more twilight fans out there than there are bashers of the series. the fans need to hear the truth. it really is bad writing. i read halfway through the first book and then threw it half way across the room.
    there is no real plot, the characters have no development, and i don’t care if its a new spin on vamps, but THEY. SHOULDN’T. GLITTER. EVER! if you are just reading the series for a bit of fluff reading, i can easily recommend far better fluff stories than Twatlight. (and yea, i spelled it like that on purpose).
    sure, again, you are entitled to have your opinion, but so are we. if you say you are entitled to your opinion of liking such spew, then you shouldn’t be either shoving it down people’s throats about how much you like it, or saying that we aren’t allowed to bash it because it hurts your pathetically fragile feelings.
    and i know that sounds contradictory to what i’m saying since i am bashing it while saying you’re allowed to have your opinions, but what i’m not saying, is that i will spare your feelings for the steaming pile of crap. have free reign to say all you want about how good it is, i’m just merely pointing out that it isn’t just the bashers of the series that are getting carried away…
    after that summer vacation that i tried to read the first book because it was required for summer reading for an english quiz, i was approached with atleast fifty people trying to say it was “THE BEST BOOK EVER CREATED YOU SHOULD READ IT OMG OMG OMG EDWARD IS HOT YOU SHOULD READ IT NOW!” after i said it was a horrible example of english literature and that i refused to read the rest of it.
    not only that, but the books weren’t even mentioned the year before. my speculation on that was that everyone did the summer reading and decided to pick twilight and got hopelessly brainwashed into the delirium of bad grammar and terribly cheesy cliches. i have a friend who read the first book when she was in 8th grade. she thought it was ok, but in her junior year, my senior year, when the hype began, she thought everyone lost their minds! as far as i know, she was the first person to know about the book and she didn’t even mention it to her closest friends and loved ones. that says something. SHE HAS A DAMN BRAIN! ITS F*CKING AMAZING! she thought it was alright and didn’t deem it necessary to even consider mentioning it.
    too bad it was exposed through the summer reading lists though…

    so my point of this whole shpeel… if you are allowed your opinion of whether its good or bad, the rest of us are too. i personally want to take a blowtorch to stephenie meyer’s face for having wasted my time with trying to see if i can find any decent part in the book, but that was a long shot and ended in failure. all in all, don’t read this list if you are too immature to take it as a joke/opinion of someone else. you are not the rest of the world, so don’t agonize and whine about it.
    i only bashed the books just now because i’d like to see how many people i can piss off for the mere fun of it! :)

  1613. twilight girl xxx
    Posted April 2, 2011 at 7:25 pm

    okay dont want to sound rude but cant you just get over the fact that you dont like the books you dont have to go away and write up all that like theres alot of things i dont like but i dont go away and write down all the reasons why i hate them just get over it just say you didnt like the book and move on

  1614. Posted April 8, 2011 at 9:55 pm

    you didnt have 95 get a life if we want to love twilight and think all of us have our own Edward and you dont we will bitch im 13 and i dont drool in my books i read them i hate you and i dont know you i thank you need help i love twilight i want you and all the other haters to get a life if you dont like it then dont read or watch the movies i hate you oops i said that 2 times i gess your stupid is going around you need to keep you problums to your self and you mom and you dad if you have one unless he left you and you mom because she cleary didint raise a smart understanding girl 8reasons you dont like you 1; YOUR STUPID 2; YOU NOT BRIGHT 3; I JUST HATE YOU 4; I CANT STAND YOU 5; YOU DONT KNOW HOW TO READ 6; I HATE YOU OOPS SAID IT AGAIN 7; NO MAN OR WOMAN WILL EVER LOVE YOU 8; YOUR GAY BECAUSE TWILIGHT IS OUR PAST,PRESENT,AND NOW IM GOING TO BITE YOU

  1615. Lucy
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 9:16 pm

    wOw. You guys are so obsessed over a list that dissed your favorite book, that you commented with a list of comments that was 10 to the 4th times longer that the actual list it’s self. O.o

    Answer to the question that was never asked: Yes, Twilight fans Are: Haters, Jealous, evil, rude, mean, obsessed, delusional, need I say more.

    Yes, this was somewhat hypocritical, but then again, so are you. Yea, I’m talking to you Twilight fans. Maybe next time we can go back to fourth grade and learn some proper grammar…^

  1616. Xan24880
    Posted April 15, 2011 at 2:17 am

    BTW if we are stupid, why do you twilight lover keep saying that you will “bite us”.
    Also, if there were gay twilight vampires, we could fend ourselves with napalm bombs, flame throwers etc.

  1617. Xan24880
    Posted April 15, 2011 at 2:17 am

    BTW if we are stupid, why do you twilight lover keep saying that you will \”bite us\”.
    Also, if there were gay twilight vampires, we could fend ourselves with napalm bombs, flame throwers etc.

  1618. Avery
    Posted April 16, 2011 at 12:01 pm

    One of the posts I read was really stupid. It was a post written by a 13 year old girl who either doesn’t know how to type or is just stupid. She was saying how much she hated the woman who wrote this list and calling her stupid. I wouldn’t talk because her post doesn’t even make sense! Just because you are not in favor of this list doesn’t mean you have to be nasty to the woman who wrote it. And this goes out to all Twilight fans who read this and left mean comments. You guys always say if you don’t like the books and the movies don’t read or watch them. That can go both ways. If you don’t agree with this list don’t read it. Why did you even look at this list in the first place? I swear some people just lack common sense. Anyways Twilight fans wouldn’t know a good book if it fell out of the sky and landed right in their hands. This book is really bad and I am in favor of this list. And props to all of the people who have enough sense to know that this series is absolutely pathetic

  1619. Posted April 16, 2011 at 12:01 pm

    One of the posts I read was really stupid. It was a post written by a 13 year old girl who either doesn\’t know how to type or is just stupid. She was saying how much she hated the woman who wrote this list and calling her stupid. I wouldn\’t talk because her post doesn\’t even make sense! Just because you are not in favor of this list doesn\’t mean you have to be nasty to the woman who wrote it. And this goes out to all Twilight fans who read this and left mean comments. You guys always say if you don\’t like the books and the movies don\’t read or watch them. That can go both ways. If you don\’t agree with this list don\’t read it. Why did you even look at this list in the first place? I swear some people just lack common sense. Anyways Twilight fans wouldn\’t know a good book if it fell out of the sky and landed right in their hands. This book is really bad and I am in favor of this list. And props to all of the people who have enough sense to know that this series is absolutely pathetic

  1620. serious?
    Posted April 17, 2011 at 8:37 pm

    I love this list it makes me laugh. I also don’t get the biting part like “1; YOUR STUPID(no she isn’t) 2; YOU NOT BRIGHT(neither are you) 3; I JUST HATE YOU(Hate you too) 4; I CANT STAND YOU(See number 3) 5; YOU DONT KNOW HOW TO READ(erm yes we do) 6; I HATE YOU OOPS SAID IT AGAIN(oh ha ha funny) 7; NO MAN OR WOMAN WILL EVER LOVE YOU(oh…really we do) 8; YOUR GAY BECAUSE TWILIGHT IS OUR PAST,PRESENT,AND NOW IM GOING TO BITE YOU(om nom nom?)” whoever said that is actually really harsh. You have just made us hate twilight fans more so basically you failed on that account and bite me see how I care, I’m sure my knuckles are harder than your nose. Sarah Rebecca you are amazing :-D

  1621. Amanda
    Posted April 20, 2011 at 10:48 am

    The only reason I’m still reading the series is because I bought all four books with good birthday money, so I might as well grin and bear it. Maybe I’ll learn to speed read so I’ll get done with them faster.
    So yeah…I hate the books, and I refuse to see the movies. This list hit the nail on the head. Bravo!

  1622. Just Smile
    Posted April 22, 2011 at 7:51 am

    First of all, I want to say that I am flabbergasted when I knew that the comments are probably 20 times longer than the list itself. I also want you to know that I laughed at the Death Note reference. You speak the truth, Light.

    Anyway, I agree with you. The Twilight Series is nothing but a cliche and overrated series that should not be called ‘The Twilight Series’ considering that the only thing the fans called ‘Twilight’ is the first book. The plot is exactly what you’d regularly find at a story on a fiction site; overused and too damn predictable. The fans are… well, let’s just say that labeling them as ‘obsessed’ is an understatement. The characters did not grow any personalities and for those characters that looked a tad interesting, the spotlight was never given to them. Overall, I don’t like it.

    Oh, and for that person up there that claims she’s 13 and will ‘bite’ the haters, I’m 13 as well and I’m not the girl that would waste her time reading those 4 books that you claim to be ‘your past, present and future’.

  1623. vickii
    Posted April 30, 2011 at 7:54 am

    …vampires dont sparkle.
    vampire diaries, is similar, but the characters have a personlaty
    vampire academys vampires can go out in the sun, but they have fangs and are based on real vampire legends…

    also original vampires could go in the sun and didnt have fangs.

    i love 66.
    the spelling mistakes are becus im dislexic

  1624. kells
    Posted May 3, 2011 at 9:26 pm

    The haters in the comments section just crack me up. The grammatical errors are the best parts – most likely a severe side effect from too much Twilight fanfiction.

    I agree with a lot of your points. Twilight is not a good example for young girls, and Edward is a controlling, abusive and stalkerish idea of what a boyfriend should be. If any girls truly desire to be treated like that, they have serious issues.

    The only complaint I have is that after number 19 (with the exception of number 18), your reasons went from legitimate and well-thought out to somewhat petty “No YOU’RE stupid” comments. Not that it wasn’t still amusing; I just feel that it could have been handled a little better. You did make several more good points throughout the list though.

    On that note, I still loved it. Every word was completely true. Vampires should not sparkle, and random mortal girls should not have an entire school falling at her feet when she’s described as “plain-looking.”

  1625. Azora xDD
    Posted May 4, 2011 at 6:41 am

    This is the best site ever.
    I’ve never had so much fun reading an article + comments.
    Just FYI, if anyone is reading this far down in this article, you really need something to do.
    I am a novel fanatic, yes, I have read Twilight, yes, I am deeply in love with works of fiction.
    I read a comment that little children actually believed vampires always ’sparkled’ when they stepped into the sun.
    I believe that in a hundred years or so, when we are all dead, that vampires will be remembered as emotional adolescents who stalk humans, don’t have fangs, will stop drinking blood because they want to become veggies, and will sparkle in the sun.
    Twilight is not, in any way shape or form a valid book about vampires.
    It is for the lovey dovey teens or sometimes adults who want to read something light hearted and romantic.
    I love a romantic story once in a while, and Twilight is no exception.
    and another comment, “english teachers hate Twilight, but they haven’t published, they suxxxxXXXX” (not exact quote, but close enough)
    You will have probably an even less qualification than teachers, why are you even hating on them? and what makes you think you have a more valid argument or even higher status than english teachers?
    To the people who say Twilight is a good book because it makes teens read.
    I agree, there is less people reading and reading these days due to internet/gaming etc.
    As Twilight may be a good/bad book, it doesn’t really matter as teens are at least trying to read.
    And this girl/woman/lady/’authoress’ is entitled as she pleases to have an opinion, just as you are when you flame her.
    Let’s just say I won’t be re-reading Twilight any time soon.
    [as a note if you doubt me, i own 100-150 novels, have recently donated 100 books to a charity, 10-40 of them are classics]
    PS: my 10 yr old sibling is reading 1 new novel a week, and has the decency to try to read Twilight before he changed for ‘Percy Jackson Series’
    Before you flame Twilight, have the decency of a 10 yr old to at least try and read it.
    My opinion of Twilight? If you can’t tell by my writing, then you may need to improve your english, or I am actually good at being expressionless.

    I do not like Twilight

  1626. I HATE TWILIGHT AND I'D RATHER SEX A GAY WEASEL THAN READ IT!
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 11:28 am

    GO HUMP A SUMO VERSION OF EDWARD CULLEN YOU STUPID TWILIGHT FAN BITCHES!

  1627. I HATE TWILIGHT AND I\'D RATHER SEX A GAY WEASEL THAN READ IT!
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 11:32 am

    oh and by the way, DIE FANS! GO TO HELL WITH BELLA T-BAGGING HER VAMPIRE MOOSE THAT HAS HALF OF BELLA\’S HAIR STUCK ON ITS ANTLERS!

  1628. Josh
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 7:58 pm

    Number 9: Actually, humanity will have to breed through rape. :p

  1629. Pony
    Posted May 16, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    “Fail” you went through a hysterical moment there huh? Trust me, I used to beat anyone that badmouthed Twilight, now I can’t get enough of the ‘I hate Twilight’ paragraphs on the Internet, you’ll get over it…
    this was hilarious!

  1630. Zephyr
    Posted May 23, 2011 at 10:40 am

    Wow you are absolutely correct. And reason no. 65 was awesome. Bella really don’t have any brains. But Harry Potter,well I personally don’t think it is any different from Twilight. And for Edward I can only say that he is an over possessive stalking pervert. God! what an asshole. And for all the Twilight die-hard fans, GROW UP.

  1631. HHH
    Posted June 2, 2011 at 6:18 pm

    Twilight sucks Bella is a May Sue she’s so freaking beautiful and Pale everyone in her School just LOVES her she’s just so awsome. Her name means “Beautiful Swan”, how lame.

    Edward is a Gay- I mean Gary Sue. He’s a beautiful,perfect,adonis,angel,sexy,glowing,radiant,angelic,immortal beauty.

  1632. Julia
    Posted June 3, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    Awesome! The Light Yagami part was brilliant! You forgot to add, “Twilight stole Death Note’s apple.” XD

    When I got to the reason about fangirls, I was like “Yeah– oh, wait, I’m a fangirl…” Not a Twilight fangirl, though. I hate Twilight so much. But still, at least I’m a smart enough fangirl to realize how pathetic it is that I’m a fangirl. XD

  1633. Just Another Face
    Posted June 3, 2011 at 4:55 pm

    I hate Twilight, but I can see why fans would be upset to see things like this. I love the Maximum Ride series, and there are a lot of haters out there. I read something dissing it, and I got mad, but I didn’t make any rude comments, or call the rider a jackass or anything. The thing that I really didn’t like about it, was that I felt BAD for liking it. I felt like there was something wrong with me enjoying it. And it just kind of made me feel bad about myself. But I can see how it is from both sides. People just need to watch what they say, the haters, and the people who hate the haters.

    I don’t hate haters, that would make me a hypocrite. I word it differently: “I hate the haters of things I like.” ^^

  1634. Sophie
    Posted July 30, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    Hahahahaha I just can’t stop laughing at the fan girl that said she hated you like 10 times and the list why she didn’t like you… God it made my day.
    I agree with your list. I laughed a lot while reading it. I personally loved “the reason why Edward can’t read Bella’s mind it’s because she doesn’t have one”, can’t agree more!

  1635. Seashell Queen
    Posted August 2, 2011 at 8:04 am

    THANK YOU!! I love this list. Though I do have to admit that a few of the points are a bit baseless, I love it all the same. What a lot of people don’t get is that the original Dracula was a novel full of sex. Throughout the history of vampires, vampires have been a symbol of sexuality. I can see why people don’t get the point about you stating there is no sex.
    Like so many people have said, this is the internet. People are allowed to have an oppinion. I don’t care if rabid twilight fans are offended by my oppinion, it’s my OPPINION and I’m fully entitled to it.
    Oh and I loved the part about Light Yagami :D

  1636. Soter
    Posted August 8, 2011 at 10:07 pm

    Stephen King is right: Rowling is a terrific writer and Meyer can’t write worth a darn.

    I wouldn’t go as far as to say that I hate Twilight, I just don’t give a shit about them. And it’s not pure Potter Fanboyism; I have read the Twilight books and they suck. And the movies are even worse…

  1637. Aranel
    Posted August 10, 2011 at 9:45 pm

    I COULDN”T AGREE MORE!!!!!! I picked up the twilight book, read the first paragraph, and threw it back on the library shelf. Needless to say, I was disgusted!

  1638. Max
    Posted August 22, 2011 at 11:52 am

    well after reading ur list im gonna read the first chapter of the book and see what i think
    i kinda think its gonna be crap just a heads up

  1639. Edward'sAGayFairy
    Posted August 23, 2011 at 2:18 am

    Oh gosh. After looking at the list and the comment thread I don’t think I need to mention anything else. I LOVE HARRY POTTER. I REALLY hate Twilight. I’ve read the whole series and hate it just TOO MUCH.
    Plus, did anyone notice why almost ALL so-called ‘Twihards’ write in short text writing. And there has to be AT LEAST two spelling mistakes in all of their sentences. I mean, what gives? Really, people who like Twilight should seek immediate medical attention.
    LONG LIVE HARRY POTTER, THE BOY WHO LIVED!

  1640. Nobody Pal
    Posted August 27, 2011 at 11:57 pm

    Shit Twilight’s the worst series I’ve come across in my entire life. I read all 4 books just to hope that I can find anything new in it but no! There was never anything new in it, it’s just all repetition! And the books should clearly ended by book2. 3rd and 4th book were a bore and are unnecessary!

    And since when is Twilight and S. Meyer better than Harry Potter and J. K. Rowling? Ok let me get this straight I’m not a huge fan of Harry Potter but seriously? I read through a couple of chapters of different Harry Potter books in the series and I have to say the language and everything was far superior than the ones in Twilight.

    Twilight’s a bitch and it deserves to fucking burn in hell. S Meyer should die in hell as well for being such a whinny, hissy bitch.

    And fuck you all Twilight fans as well, you brainless creatures!

  1641. TwilightIsSh*t
    Posted September 4, 2011 at 4:34 am

    Okay, this was funny. Since you clearly had the time, though, you could’ve thought of much better reasons.
    I agree that Twilight sucks as much as hell. And no, I don’t hate it just because I want to show that I’m cool and different. I USED TO like it when I read it first when I was twelve. That was before the hype began and I didn’t even know the movie existed. lol. And after I watched the movie I thought it was complete bullsh*t. Robert Pattinson looked absolutely REVOLTING. Kristen Stewart did her best she could with the minimal material she had on Bella who has no character at all. I admire her effort. And Taylor Lautner sucked really bad. (I know I’ll get bashed for saying that. But I don’t care.) He was just there so that the movie got wild screaming thirteen year olds who haven’t read/watched better books/movies.
    And the books, I realized I’d liked them because I was so mesmerized by Edward. I hadn’t realized what a lame story it was because honestly, it wasn’t easy getting over him. Stephanie Meyer played a really clever game. She took advantage of the fact that MOST (I repeat–MOST) of the girls in America didn’t know what proper literature was and she gave them exactly what they wanted–the perfect guy; modern day Prince Charming, rich, powerful and handsome. (SMeyer has to understand that guys aren’t described as ‘beautiful’)
    Anywho, she disguised the terrible plot with Edward, and the fact that Bella is COMPLETELY worthless. Someone above mentioned that she doesn’t obey Edward and goes to save her Mom. Look what happens there. Edward has to end up saving HER. It just degrades her further, showing that even if she can make a decision, it’s the wrong one. And when she finds out what Victoria was up to, does ANYONE give a damn? They listen her theory and go on about their own business, and don’t even bother to find out if she’s right or not.
    I know, a lot of people are mad at SMeyer because she became rich and famous without doing much work. (To all those Twihards out there–She DID NOT pour her heart and soul into the book like you claim). I’m one of the people who think there are better authors out there who deserve it WAY more than she does. It isn’t the WORST piece of literature but definitely one of them.
    SOME of the people here are upset about your list. This is what I have to say to them–Why would you be searching for lists like these anyways? And trust me, really, there is NOTHING to like about Twilight. Okay, maybe to some of you its nice for a piece of light reading but please don’t hold it up as the best piece of literature ever written. ‘Cause it’s not. Your insulting LOTS of other books by doing that. Your allowed your own opinion but give a proper reason for it. A reason that isn’t ‘OMGEEE EDWARD IZZZ SOOOOOOOOO HAWWTT!!’ or ‘JACOB IZZZZ DA BEEEST!!’ And learn to take constructive criticism.
    Now this is my opinion about Twilight’s plot.

    Bella: “I’m a bitter, depressed teen who’s gonna ignore all my friends and sit around chewing my lip and
    looking vulnerable until I get a guy…”
    Edward: “Mmm you smell good, can I drink your blood and kill you?”
    Bella: “You’re hot. I’m not scared of you. Please have sex with me and then bite me so I can have a
    demon child and watch all my friends and family die. I don’t care about them, I just need you..
    Edward: “I’ve been watching you sleep.”
    Bella: “Ohh that’s soooo romantic!”
    Edward: “Come and meet my bloodsucking family, they might try to kill you”
    ~~blah blah blah bits in between… Bella almost dies~~
    Jasper: “OM NOM NOM NOM BELLA!”
    Edward: “It’s too dangerous for you, I’m leaving.”
    Bella: “Maybe if I do REALLY dangerous things I can hallucinate that he’s back!”
    *Jumps off cliff*
    Twi‐hating audience: “Awwww why didn’t she DIE!?”
    Jacob: “Hi, I seem really nice, I’m a supporting friend and all, but I’m also a werewolf. I’m better for you
    than Edward.”
    Twi‐ Loving audience: “What did he say?” “WHO CARES, look at those abs!” “I love this movie, he’s
    soooo hot!”
    Bella: “Thanks for mending my heart, Jacob! Now I’m gonna break yours!”
    Edward: “Oh noes! Bella’s DEAD! I didn’t even get to drink her blood yet! Better do something highly
    illegal by vampire standards and get myself killed!”
    Bella: “Let’s go to Italy and walk right into the arms of the evil but highly merciful Volturi… without
    telling my Dad. I have to save my abusive stalker boyfriend who left me and broke my heart, even
    though they will probably kill me!”
    Blah blah blah boring stuff in between, sadly Edward is safe again
    Bella: “Bite me!”
    Edward: “Marry me!”
    Bella: “Have sex with me first!”
    Edward: “I might kill you but.. ok”
    Bella: “I’m pregnant, this thing’s trying to claw its way out of my belly and kill me! Awww! Let’s keep it!”
    Bella: “I think I’m dying…”
    Here, drink some human blood……
    Carlisle: “Surprise! It’s your birthday! Oh and you have a baby daughter! She grows quickly, and she can
    send you visions, and the Volturi are after her!”
    Edward: “Surprise, you’re a vampire! I bit you while you were giving birth!”
    Jacob: “Surprise, I’m in love with your baby daughter!”
    ARGHH PEDOPHILE!
    ~~Big lead up to epic battle that never happens~~
    And now you can live happily ever after for the rest of your 19 year old afterlife in a cottage in the
    middle of the woods with your demon baby and sparkly stalker boyfriend while everyone you’ve ever
    known DIES without knowing what’s happened to you. Have fun!
    *Bella and Edward have sex again* The end.

    And for the record: TWILIGHT WILL NEVER REPLACE HARRY POTTER!!

    Thank you.

  1642. TwilightSucks(aka PotterFreak)
    Posted September 4, 2011 at 4:38 am

    Okay, this was funny. Since you clearly had the time, though, you could\’ve thought of much better reasons.
    I agree that Twilight sucks as much as hell. And no, I don\’t hate it just because I want to show that I\’m cool and different. I USED TO like it when I read it first when I was twelve. That was before the hype began and I didn\’t even know the movie existed. lol. And after I watched the movie I thought it was complete bullsh*t. Robert Pattinson looked absolutely REVOLTING. Kristen Stewart did her best she could with the minimal material she had on Bella who has no character at all. I admire her effort. And Taylor Lautner sucked really bad. (I know I\’ll get bashed for saying that. But I don\’t care.) He was just there so that the movie got wild screaming thirteen year olds who haven\’t read/watched better books/movies.
    And the books, I realized I\’d liked them because I was so mesmerized by Edward. I hadn\’t realized what a lame story it was because honestly, it wasn\’t easy getting over him. Stephanie Meyer played a really clever game. She took advantage of the fact that MOST (I repeat–MOST) of the girls in America didn\’t know what proper literature was and she gave them exactly what they wanted–the perfect guy; modern day Prince Charming, rich, powerful and handsome. (SMeyer has to understand that guys aren\’t described as \’beautiful\’)
    Anywho, she disguised the terrible plot with Edward, and the fact that Bella is COMPLETELY worthless. Someone above mentioned that she doesn\’t obey Edward and goes to save her Mom. Look what happens there. Edward has to end up saving HER. It just degrades her further, showing that even if she can make a decision, it\’s the wrong one. And when she finds out what Victoria was up to, does ANYONE give a damn? They listen her theory and go on about their own business, and don\’t even bother to find out if she\’s right or not.
    I know, a lot of people are mad at SMeyer because she became rich and famous without doing much work. (To all those Twihards out there–She DID NOT pour her heart and soul into the book like you claim). I\’m one of the people who think there are better authors out there who deserve it WAY more than she does. It isn\’t the WORST piece of literature but definitely one of them.
    SOME of the people here are upset about your list. This is what I have to say to them–Why would you be searching for lists like these anyways? And trust me, really, there is NOTHING to like about Twilight. Okay, maybe to some of you its nice for a piece of light reading but please don\’t hold it up as the best piece of literature ever written. \’Cause it\’s not. Your insulting LOTS of other books by doing that. Your allowed your own opinion but give a proper reason for it. A reason that isn\’t \’OMGEEE EDWARD IZZZ SOOOOOOOOO HAWWTT!!\’ or \’JACOB IZZZZ DA BEEEST!!\’ And learn to take constructive criticism.
    Now this is my opinion about Twilight\’s plot.

    Bella: “I’m a bitter, depressed teen who’s gonna ignore all my friends and sit around chewing my lip and
    looking vulnerable until I get a guy…”
    Edward: “Mmm you smell good, can I drink your blood and kill you?”
    Bella: “You’re hot. I’m not scared of you. Please have sex with me and then bite me so I can have a
    demon child and watch all my friends and family die. I don’t care about them, I just need you..
    Edward: “I’ve been watching you sleep.”
    Bella: “Ohh that’s soooo romantic!”
    Edward: “Come and meet my bloodsucking family, they might try to kill you”
    ~~blah blah blah bits in between… Bella almost dies~~
    Jasper: “OM NOM NOM NOM BELLA!”
    Edward: “It’s too dangerous for you, I’m leaving.”
    Bella: “Maybe if I do REALLY dangerous things I can hallucinate that he’s back!”
    *Jumps off cliff*
    Twi‐hating audience: “Awwww why didn’t she DIE!?”
    Jacob: “Hi, I seem really nice, I’m a supporting friend and all, but I’m also a werewolf. I’m better for you
    than Edward.”
    Twi‐ Loving audience: “What did he say?” “WHO CARES, look at those abs!” “I love this movie, he’s
    soooo hot!”
    Bella: “Thanks for mending my heart, Jacob! Now I’m gonna break yours!”
    Edward: “Oh noes! Bella’s DEAD! I didn’t even get to drink her blood yet! Better do something highly
    illegal by vampire standards and get myself killed!”
    Bella: “Let’s go to Italy and walk right into the arms of the evil but highly merciful Volturi… without
    telling my Dad. I have to save my abusive stalker boyfriend who left me and broke my heart, even
    though they will probably kill me!”
    Blah blah blah boring stuff in between, sadly Edward is safe again
    Bella: “Bite me!”
    Edward: “Marry me!”
    Bella: “Have sex with me first!”
    Edward: “I might kill you but.. ok”
    Bella: “I’m pregnant, this thing’s trying to claw its way out of my belly and kill me! Awww! Let’s keep it!”
    Bella: “I think I’m dying…”
    Here, drink some human blood……
    Carlisle: “Surprise! It’s your birthday! Oh and you have a baby daughter! She grows quickly, and she can
    send you visions, and the Volturi are after her!”
    Edward: “Surprise, you’re a vampire! I bit you while you were giving birth!”
    Jacob: “Surprise, I’m in love with your baby daughter!”
    ARGHH PEDOPHILE!
    ~~Big lead up to epic battle that never happens~~
    And now you can live happily ever after for the rest of your 19 year old afterlife in a cottage in the
    middle of the woods with your demon baby and sparkly stalker boyfriend while everyone you’ve ever
    known DIES without knowing what’s happened to you. Have fun!
    *Bella and Edward have sex again* The end.

    Again, MY opinion. If you have any contradictions, please mail me at emma.beckett@live.com

    And for the record: TWILIGHT WILL NEVER REPLACE HARRY POTTER!!

    Thank you.

  1643. TwilightSucks(aka PotterFreak)
    Posted September 4, 2011 at 4:40 am

    Okay, this was funny. Since you clearly had the time, though, you could\\\’ve thought of much better reasons.
    I agree that Twilight sucks as much as hell. And no, I don\\\’t hate it just because I want to show that I\\\’m cool and different. I USED TO like it when I read it first when I was twelve. That was before the hype began and I didn\\\’t even know the movie existed. lol. And after I watched the movie I thought it was complete bullsh*t. Robert Pattinson looked absolutely REVOLTING. Kristen Stewart did her best she could with the minimal material she had on Bella who has no character at all. I admire her effort. And Taylor Lautner sucked really bad. (I know I\\\’ll get bashed for saying that. But I don\\\’t care.) He was just there so that the movie got wild screaming thirteen year olds who haven\\\’t read/watched better books/movies.
    And the books, I realized I\\\’d liked them because I was so mesmerized by Edward. I hadn\\\’t realized what a lame story it was because honestly, it wasn\\\’t easy getting over him. Stephanie Meyer played a really clever game. She took advantage of the fact that MOST (I repeat–MOST) of the girls in America didn\\\’t know what proper literature was and she gave them exactly what they wanted–the perfect guy; modern day Prince Charming, rich, powerful and handsome. (SMeyer has to understand that guys aren\\\’t described as \\\’beautiful\\\’)
    Anywho, she disguised the terrible plot with Edward, and the fact that Bella is COMPLETELY worthless. Someone above mentioned that she doesn\\\’t obey Edward and goes to save her Mom. Look what happens there. Edward has to end up saving HER. It just degrades her further, showing that even if she can make a decision, it\\\’s the wrong one. And when she finds out what Victoria was up to, does ANYONE give a damn? They listen her theory and go on about their own business, and don\\\’t even bother to find out if she\\\’s right or not.
    I know, a lot of people are mad at SMeyer because she became rich and famous without doing much work. (To all those Twihards out there–She DID NOT pour her heart and soul into the book like you claim). I\\\’m one of the people who think there are better authors out there who deserve it WAY more than she does. It isn\\\’t the WORST piece of literature but definitely one of them.
    SOME of the people here are upset about your list. This is what I have to say to them–Why would you be searching for lists like these anyways? And trust me, really, there is NOTHING to like about Twilight. Okay, maybe to some of you its nice for a piece of light reading but please don\\\’t hold it up as the best piece of literature ever written. \\\’Cause it\\\’s not. Your insulting LOTS of other books by doing that. Your allowed your own opinion but give a proper reason for it. A reason that isn\\\’t \\\’OMGEEE EDWARD IZZZ SOOOOOOOOO HAWWTT!!\\\’ or \\\’JACOB IZZZZ DA BEEEST!!\\\’ And learn to take constructive criticism.
    Now this is my opinion about Twilight\\\’s plot.

    Bella: “I’m a bitter, depressed teen who’s gonna ignore all my friends and sit around chewing my lip and
    looking vulnerable until I get a guy…”
    Edward: “Mmm you smell good, can I drink your blood and kill you?”
    Bella: “You’re hot. I’m not scared of you. Please have sex with me and then bite me so I can have a
    demon child and watch all my friends and family die. I don’t care about them, I just need you..
    Edward: “I’ve been watching you sleep.”
    Bella: “Ohh that’s soooo romantic!”
    Edward: “Come and meet my bloodsucking family, they might try to kill you”
    ~~blah blah blah bits in between… Bella almost dies~~
    Jasper: “OM NOM NOM NOM BELLA!”
    Edward: “It’s too dangerous for you, I’m leaving.”
    Bella: “Maybe if I do REALLY dangerous things I can hallucinate that he’s back!”
    *Jumps off cliff*
    Twi‐hating audience: “Awwww why didn’t she DIE!?”
    Jacob: “Hi, I seem really nice, I’m a supporting friend and all, but I’m also a werewolf. I’m better for you
    than Edward.”
    Twi‐ Loving audience: “What did he say?” “WHO CARES, look at those abs!” “I love this movie, he’s
    soooo hot!”
    Bella: “Thanks for mending my heart, Jacob! Now I’m gonna break yours!”
    Edward: “Oh noes! Bella’s DEAD! I didn’t even get to drink her blood yet! Better do something highly
    illegal by vampire standards and get myself killed!”
    Bella: “Let’s go to Italy and walk right into the arms of the evil but highly merciful Volturi… without
    telling my Dad. I have to save my abusive stalker boyfriend who left me and broke my heart, even
    though they will probably kill me!”
    Blah blah blah boring stuff in between, sadly Edward is safe again
    Bella: “Bite me!”
    Edward: “Marry me!”
    Bella: “Have sex with me first!”
    Edward: “I might kill you but.. ok”
    Bella: “I’m pregnant, this thing’s trying to claw its way out of my belly and kill me! Awww! Let’s keep it!”
    Bella: “I think I’m dying…”
    Here, drink some human blood……
    Carlisle: “Surprise! It’s your birthday! Oh and you have a baby daughter! She grows quickly, and she can
    send you visions, and the Volturi are after her!”
    Edward: “Surprise, you’re a vampire! I bit you while you were giving birth!”
    Jacob: “Surprise, I’m in love with your baby daughter!”
    ARGHH PEDOPHILE!
    ~~Big lead up to epic battle that never happens~~
    And now you can live happily ever after for the rest of your 19 year old afterlife in a cottage in the
    middle of the woods with your demon baby and sparkly stalker boyfriend while everyone you’ve ever
    known DIES without knowing what’s happened to you. Have fun!
    *Bella and Edward have sex again* The end.

    Again, MY opinion. If you have any contradictions, please mail me at emma.beckett@live.com

    And for the record: TWILIGHT WILL NEVER REPLACE HARRY POTTER!!

    Thank you.

  1644. EmmaBeckett
    Posted September 4, 2011 at 4:43 am

    Okay, this was funny. Since you clearly had the time, though, you could ‘ve thought of much better reasons.
    I agree that Twilight sucks as much as hell. And no, I don ‘t hate it just because I want to show that I ‘m cool and different. I USED TO like it when I read it first when I was twelve. That was before the hype began and I didn ‘t even know the movie existed. lol. And after I watched the movie I thought it was complete bullsh*t. Robert Pattinson looked absolutely REVOLTING. Kristen Stewart did her best she could with the minimal material she had on Bella who has no character at all. I admire her effort. And Taylor Lautner sucked really bad. (I know I ‘ll get bashed for saying that. But I don ‘t care.) He was just there so that the movie got wild screaming thirteen year olds who haven ‘t read/watched better books/movies.
    And the books, I realized I ‘d liked them because I was so mesmerized by Edward. I hadn ‘t realized what a lame story it was because honestly, it wasn ‘t easy getting over him. Stephanie Meyer played a really clever game. She took advantage of the fact that MOST (I repeat–MOST) of the girls in America didn ‘t know what proper literature was and she gave them exactly what they wanted–the perfect guy; modern day Prince Charming, rich, powerful and handsome. (SMeyer has to understand that guys aren ‘t described as ‘beautiful ‘)
    Anywho, she disguised the terrible plot with Edward, and the fact that Bella is COMPLETELY worthless. Someone above mentioned that she doesn ‘t obey Edward and goes to save her Mom. Look what happens there. Edward has to end up saving HER. It just degrades her further, showing that even if she can make a decision, it ‘s the wrong one. And when she finds out what Victoria was up to, does ANYONE give a damn? They listen her theory and go on about their own business, and don ‘t even bother to find out if she ‘s right or not.
    I know, a lot of people are mad at SMeyer because she became rich and famous without doing much work. (To all those Twihards out there–She DID NOT pour her heart and soul into the book like you claim). I ‘m one of the people who think there are better authors out there who deserve it WAY more than she does. It isn ‘t the WORST piece of literature but definitely one of them.
    SOME of the people here are upset about your list. This is what I have to say to them–Why would you be searching for lists like these anyways? And trust me, really, there is NOTHING to like about Twilight. Okay, maybe to some of you its nice for a piece of light reading but please don ‘t hold it up as the best piece of literature ever written. ‘Cause it ‘s not. Your insulting LOTS of other books by doing that. Your allowed your own opinion but give a proper reason for it. A reason that isn ‘t ‘OMGEEE EDWARD IZZZ SOOOOOOOOO HAWWTT!! ‘ or ‘JACOB IZZZZ DA BEEEST!! ‘ And learn to take constructive criticism.
    Now this is my opinion about Twilight ‘s plot.

    Bella: “I’m a bitter, depressed teen who’s gonna ignore all my friends and sit around chewing my lip and
    looking vulnerable until I get a guy…”
    Edward: “Mmm you smell good, can I drink your blood and kill you?”
    Bella: “You’re hot. I’m not scared of you. Please have sex with me and then bite me so I can have a
    demon child and watch all my friends and family die. I don’t care about them, I just need you..
    Edward: “I’ve been watching you sleep.”
    Bella: “Ohh that’s soooo romantic!”
    Edward: “Come and meet my bloodsucking family, they might try to kill you”
    ~~blah blah blah bits in between… Bella almost dies~~
    Jasper: “OM NOM NOM NOM BELLA!”
    Edward: “It’s too dangerous for you, I’m leaving.”
    Bella: “Maybe if I do REALLY dangerous things I can hallucinate that he’s back!”
    *Jumps off cliff*
    Twi‐hating audience: “Awwww why didn’t she DIE!?”
    Jacob: “Hi, I seem really nice, I’m a supporting friend and all, but I’m also a werewolf. I’m better for you
    than Edward.”
    Twi‐ Loving audience: “What did he say?” “WHO CARES, look at those abs!” “I love this movie, he’s
    soooo hot!”
    Bella: “Thanks for mending my heart, Jacob! Now I’m gonna break yours!”
    Edward: “Oh noes! Bella’s DEAD! I didn’t even get to drink her blood yet! Better do something highly
    illegal by vampire standards and get myself killed!”
    Bella: “Let’s go to Italy and walk right into the arms of the evil but highly merciful Volturi… without
    telling my Dad. I have to save my abusive stalker boyfriend who left me and broke my heart, even
    though they will probably kill me!”
    Blah blah blah boring stuff in between, sadly Edward is safe again
    Bella: “Bite me!”
    Edward: “Marry me!”
    Bella: “Have sex with me first!”
    Edward: “I might kill you but.. ok”
    Bella: “I’m pregnant, this thing’s trying to claw its way out of my belly and kill me! Awww! Let’s keep it!”
    Bella: “I think I’m dying…”
    Here, drink some human blood……
    Carlisle: “Surprise! It’s your birthday! Oh and you have a baby daughter! She grows quickly, and she can
    send you visions, and the Volturi are after her!”
    Edward: “Surprise, you’re a vampire! I bit you while you were giving birth!”
    Jacob: “Surprise, I’m in love with your baby daughter!”
    ARGHH PEDOPHILE!
    ~~Big lead up to epic battle that never happens~~
    And now you can live happily ever after for the rest of your 19 year old afterlife in a cottage in the
    middle of the woods with your demon baby and sparkly stalker boyfriend while everyone you’ve ever
    known DIES without knowing what’s happened to you. Have fun!
    *Bella and Edward have sex again* The end.

    Again, MY opinion. If you have any contradictions, please mail me at emma.beckett@live.com

    And for the record: TWILIGHT WILL NEVER REPLACE HARRY POTTER!!

    Thank you.

  1645. Lauren
    Posted September 10, 2011 at 6:50 pm

    Meyer can’t think of original names. The only original name she used was Rennesme, which is combination of two names and doesn’t count.

    First off, you spelled Renesmee wrong. Second, “which is a combination of two names and doesn’t count.” Who said that name doesn’t count? It’s an original name, yes, but doesn’t mean it does not count?

    However, a few things I do agree on with you. I neither like the way she put “first off. Edward was a vampire.” on the back of Twilight if it’s supposed to be a mystery on what he is.

    I laughed when I read your reason on how Carlisle only changes teenagers into vampires. (Other than Esme).

    Some I don’t understand though is about “Vampires playing baseball is a disgrace.” I don’t see it as a disgrace, humans have played baseball for YEARS. The Cullen’s main goal is to appear as human as possible in the series. (Even if Edward runs in front of a van?)

    Yes, I absolutely agree with you on when you said Stephenie Meyer doesn’t pay attention to such epicly unique characters like Alice and Jasper. I actually just want her to make a book about Alice and Jasper, or on how they found each other. Yes, I know it’s included in the Offical Twilight Guide, but it would be much more interesting from Alice or Jasper’s point of view from the story.

  1646. Wendy
    Posted September 14, 2011 at 3:29 am

    I am reading the first book and as a joke I started to stick post-its at every wonderful description there is of the “Godlike” Edward, I ran out of post-its and I’m at page 249.

    So far I can’t like anyone in the book, nothing really happens and it’s become painful to read.

    I have a problem with the fact that here are so many grammatical errors in the book. You would think that a person who received millions upon millions of dollars could find a good editor.

  1647. Kai
    Posted September 14, 2011 at 2:42 pm

    I’ve read the first two books and watched the first movie but…

    Twilight books: Mediocre
    Twilight movies: *Shuuder*

    I tried watching the Twilight movie but I was all *fast forward, fast forward* and then I just couldn’t take it anymore.

    The only thing that got my interest is the Volturi Clan. Maybe because they have personalities and they’re pretty cool. However, no character developments. In fact, there is absolutely no character development in this book at all!

    I tried twi-hards, I tried…
    but I just couldn’t see the light. Must be because you saw it on Edward’s bodeh.

    Don’t get me started on Ms. Meyer’s mediocre way of writing. This book is for 7 year olds.

  1648. Sandra
    Posted September 18, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    Ok, you didn’t liked it. Maybe Stephanie Mayer is a bad author. But she really knows how to touch people hearts. You didn’t got the point. When shge says bella was a perfectly normal girl she means she was exactly the opposite of Edward. Bella was special in a strange way. Cause’ she wasn’t like anybody else. That’s why edward’s attracted to her. He feelt in love with her not because she was beautiful. Not at all. Because she was special. And it’s my oppinion. Stephanie knows how to write a true love story. Her grammar mistekes are not my business. It(the story) attract’s me because of the intensity of their love. And if you didn’t liked it…why are you so obssesd with those details?

  1649. elloh
    Posted September 24, 2011 at 4:29 am

    Ok, I have quite a few things to say, mostly to the first hundred comments that I read that were posted way back in 2009.

    Firstly, the author of this blog has a right to her own opinion, and by simply stating that she’s full of crap and that the Twilight series is fantastic is exactly what she is talking about. I am probably the biggest Harry Potter fan that you will ever come across and have not read Twilight but I hope you don’t dislike me for that reason. But whenever someone insults Harry Potter in front of me, I simply shrug my shoulders and walk away, never to bring it up again. Secondly, please don’t continue to tell her that she’s being hypocritical because her grammar is off. This is a blog, not a novel. Bad grammar should be allowed on a small blog, but never in a book. This list was most likely a little bit of fun, and you have no right to tell her off for that. If you’re so obsessed with Twilight then why are you even reading this post?! Surely you have better things to do in your free time than flame some poor girl.

    Next, to the person who wrote this and anyone else who cares to read it:

    ‘As much as the purists may want to disagree, literature is about making money. You may dislike the story, you may find grammatical errors, you may even think the message is dangerous, but if it SELLS then maybe instead of wasting your time compiling a list of why “Twilight” sucks, you may want to study why it has succeeded and see if you have the talent or ability to do so yourself. If you can’t make as much money and as many sales as this author has, then no matter what, she is more SUCCESSFUL than you are or may ever be.’

    Literature has never been, is never and I hope never will be about making money, in my own opinion of course. As a budding author, I have written a few novels and sent them off for my friends to read but never once to an editor and could not care less. Literature is about expressing your thoughts and feeling and being imaginative and creative in writing.

    Now, to everyone who says that “At least teenage girls are reading!” I am a 13 year old girl, with Twilight lovers and haters alike as friends. I have never read Twilight, nor do I ever intend to. All of the fangirls I have as friends are hard to stand after a while because of their obsessiveness. I am an avid reader, and to suggest that all 13 year olds never read is quite rude. My close friend and I, both obsessed with reading, have gotten another one of our friends to read without coming close to such crap. It started as lending her my favourite book, in which she kept for six or so months, and returned it, not having liked it much, but she read a book. We then had a competition to see who could read the Harry Potter series the fastest (I, of course, won!) and that’s another seven books on the pile of books she’s read recently. So please don’t try and tell me that the only way to get people to read is to shove crappy novels at their faces and tell them to read.

    Next, I am going to agree with the author on many different levels, even if I haven’t read the series. All I hear from friends who like Twilight is how perfect Edward is, and what people fail to realise is that nobody’s perfect, not even sparkly vampires! Bella is also immensely dependent on someone else, which is never going to be healthy. The list was funny and entertaining and for some reason came up when I searched Harry Potter!!! So well done :D There is no plot, even when I ask my friends to explain it to me. They start with “It’s a long story.” and end, a minute later with “So yeah…” I can hardly see what people see in it. The hype of it all is insane too, and whatever anyone tells me, I shall never believe that Edward (or Robert Pattinson) is hot, as it’s hard to believe that they could be with such descriptions I’ve heard of him.

    Ok, so that was an insanely long post, I’d just like to wind up with saying thanks!!! That was pretty awesome and just made me waste an hour of my life :D xxx

  1650. elloh
    Posted September 24, 2011 at 4:32 am

    Ok, I have quite a few things to say, mostly to the first hundred comments that I read that were posted way back in 2009.

    Firstly, the author of this blog has a right to her own opinion, and by simply stating that she\’s full of crap and that the Twilight series is fantastic is exactly what she is talking about. I am probably the biggest Harry Potter fan that you will ever come across and have not read Twilight but I hope you don\’t dislike me for that reason. But whenever someone insults Harry Potter in front of me, I simply shrug my shoulders and walk away, never to bring it up again. Secondly, please don\’t continue to tell her that she\’s being hypocritical because her grammar is off. This is a blog, not a novel. Bad grammar should be allowed on a small blog, but never in a book. This list was most likely a little bit of fun, and you have no right to tell her off for that. If you\’re so obsessed with Twilight then why are you even reading this post?! Surely you have better things to do in your free time than flame some poor girl.

    Next, to the person who wrote this and anyone else who cares to read it:

    \’As much as the purists may want to disagree, literature is about making money. You may dislike the story, you may find grammatical errors, you may even think the message is dangerous, but if it SELLS then maybe instead of wasting your time compiling a list of why “Twilight” sucks, you may want to study why it has succeeded and see if you have the talent or ability to do so yourself. If you can’t make as much money and as many sales as this author has, then no matter what, she is more SUCCESSFUL than you are or may ever be.\’

    Literature has never been, is never and I hope never will be about making money, in my own opinion of course. As a budding author, I have written a few novels and sent them off for my friends to read but never once to an editor and could not care less. Literature is about expressing your thoughts and feeling and being imaginative and creative in writing.

    Now, to everyone who says that \”At least teenage girls are reading!\” I am a 13 year old girl, with Twilight lovers and haters alike as friends. I have never read Twilight, nor do I ever intend to. All of the fangirls I have as friends are hard to stand after a while because of their obsessiveness. I am an avid reader, and to suggest that all 13 year olds never read is quite rude. My close friend and I, both obsessed with reading, have gotten another one of our friends to read without coming close to such crap. It started as lending her my favourite book, in which she kept for six or so months, and returned it, not having liked it much, but she read a book. We then had a competition to see who could read the Harry Potter series the fastest (I, of course, won!) and that\’s another seven books on the pile of books she\’s read recently. So please don\’t try and tell me that the only way to get people to read is to shove crappy novels at their faces and tell them to read.

    Next, I am going to agree with the author on many different levels, even if I haven\’t read the series. All I hear from friends who like Twilight is how perfect Edward is, and what people fail to realise is that nobody\’s perfect, not even sparkly vampires! Bella is also immensely dependent on someone else, which is never going to be healthy. The list was funny and entertaining and for some reason came up when I searched Harry Potter!!! So well done :D There is no plot, even when I ask my friends to explain it to me. They start with \”It\’s a long story.\” and end, a minute later with \”So yeah…\” I can hardly see what people see in it. The hype of it all is insane too, and whatever anyone tells me, I shall never believe that Edward (or Robert Pattinson) is hot, as it\’s hard to believe that they could be with such descriptions I\’ve heard of him.

    Ok, so that was an insanely long post, I\’d just like to wind up with saying thanks!!! That was pretty awesome and just made me waste an hour of my life :D xxx

  1651. elloh
    Posted September 24, 2011 at 4:32 am

    Ok, I have quite a few things to say, mostly to the first hundred comments that I read that were posted way back in 2009.

    Firstly, the author of this blog has a right to her own opinion, and by simply stating that she\\\’s full of crap and that the Twilight series is fantastic is exactly what she is talking about. I am probably the biggest Harry Potter fan that you will ever come across and have not read Twilight but I hope you don\\\’t dislike me for that reason. But whenever someone insults Harry Potter in front of me, I simply shrug my shoulders and walk away, never to bring it up again. Secondly, please don\\\’t continue to tell her that she\\\’s being hypocritical because her grammar is off. This is a blog, not a novel. Bad grammar should be allowed on a small blog, but never in a book. This list was most likely a little bit of fun, and you have no right to tell her off for that. If you\\\’re so obsessed with Twilight then why are you even reading this post?! Surely you have better things to do in your free time than flame some poor girl.

    Next, to the person who wrote this and anyone else who cares to read it:

    \\\’As much as the purists may want to disagree, literature is about making money. You may dislike the story, you may find grammatical errors, you may even think the message is dangerous, but if it SELLS then maybe instead of wasting your time compiling a list of why “Twilight” sucks, you may want to study why it has succeeded and see if you have the talent or ability to do so yourself. If you can’t make as much money and as many sales as this author has, then no matter what, she is more SUCCESSFUL than you are or may ever be.\\\’

    Literature has never been, is never and I hope never will be about making money, in my own opinion of course. As a budding author, I have written a few novels and sent them off for my friends to read but never once to an editor and could not care less. Literature is about expressing your thoughts and feeling and being imaginative and creative in writing.

    Now, to everyone who says that \\\”At least teenage girls are reading!\\\” I am a 13 year old girl, with Twilight lovers and haters alike as friends. I have never read Twilight, nor do I ever intend to. All of the fangirls I have as friends are hard to stand after a while because of their obsessiveness. I am an avid reader, and to suggest that all 13 year olds never read is quite rude. My close friend and I, both obsessed with reading, have gotten another one of our friends to read without coming close to such crap. It started as lending her my favourite book, in which she kept for six or so months, and returned it, not having liked it much, but she read a book. We then had a competition to see who could read the Harry Potter series the fastest (I, of course, won!) and that\\\’s another seven books on the pile of books she\\\’s read recently. So please don\\\’t try and tell me that the only way to get people to read is to shove crappy novels at their faces and tell them to read.

    Next, I am going to agree with the author on many different levels, even if I haven\\\’t read the series. All I hear from friends who like Twilight is how perfect Edward is, and what people fail to realise is that nobody\\\’s perfect, not even sparkly vampires! Bella is also immensely dependent on someone else, which is never going to be healthy. The list was funny and entertaining and for some reason came up when I searched Harry Potter!!! So well done :D There is no plot, even when I ask my friends to explain it to me. They start with \\\”It\\\’s a long story.\\\” and end, a minute later with \\\”So yeah…\\\” I can hardly see what people see in it. The hype of it all is insane too, and whatever anyone tells me, I shall never believe that Edward (or Robert Pattinson) is hot, as it\\\’s hard to believe that they could be with such descriptions I\\\’ve heard of him.

    Ok, so that was an insanely long post, I\\\’d just like to wind up with saying thanks!!! That was pretty awesome and just made me waste an hour of my life :D xxx

  1652. elloh elloh!! x
    Posted September 24, 2011 at 6:02 am

    Ok, I have quite a few things to say, mostly to the first hundred comments that I read that were posted way back in 2009.

    Firstly, the author of this blog has a right to her own opinion, and by simply stating that she’s full of crap and that the Twilight series is fantastic is exactly what she is talking about. I am probably the biggest Harry Potter fan that you will ever come across and have not read Twilight but I hope you don’t dislike me for that reason. But whenever someone insults Harry Potter in front of me, I simply shrug my shoulders and walk away, never to bring it up again. Secondly, please don’t continue to tell her that she’s being hypocritical because her grammar is off. This is a blog, not a novel. Bad grammar should be allowed on a small blog, but never in a book. This list was most likely a little bit of fun, and you have no right to tell her off for that. If you’re so obsessed with Twilight then why are you even reading this post?! Surely you have better things to do in your free time than flame some poor girl.

    Next, to the person who wrote this and anyone else who cares to read it:

    ‘As much as the purists may want to disagree, literature is about making money. You may dislike the story, you may find grammatical errors, you may even think the message is dangerous, but if it SELLS then maybe instead of wasting your time compiling a list of why “Twilight” sucks, you may want to study why it has succeeded and see if you have the talent or ability to do so yourself. If you can’t make as much money and as many sales as this author has, then no matter what, she is more SUCCESSFUL than you are or may ever be.’

    Literature has never been, is never and I hope never will be about making money, in my own opinion of course. As a budding author, I have written a few novels and sent them off for my friends to read but never once to an editor and could not care less. Literature is about expressing your thoughts and feeling and being imaginative and creative in writing.

    Now, to everyone who says that “At least teenage girls are reading!” I am a 13 year old girl, with Twilight lovers and haters alike as friends. I have never read Twilight, nor do I ever intend to. All of the fangirls I have as friends are hard to stand after a while because of their obsessiveness. I am an avid reader, and to suggest that all 13 year olds never read is quite rude. My close friend and I, both obsessed with reading, have gotten another one of our friends to read without coming close to such crap. It started as lending her my favourite book, in which she kept for six or so months, and returned it, not having liked it much, but she read a book. We then had a competition to see who could read the Harry Potter series the fastest (I, of course, won!) and that’s another seven books on the pile of books she’s read recently. So please don’t try and tell me that the only way to get people to read is to shove crappy novels at their faces and tell them to read.

    Next, I am going to agree with the author on many different levels, even if I haven’t read the series. All I hear from friends who like Twilight is how perfect Edward is, and what people fail to realise is that nobody’s perfect, not even sparkly vampires! Bella is also immensely dependent on someone else, which is never going to be healthy. The list was funny and entertaining and for some reason came up when I searched Harry Potter!!! So well done :D There is no plot, even when I ask my friends to explain it to me. They start with “It’s a long story.” and end, a minute later with “So yeah…” I can hardly see what people see in it. The hype of it all is insane too, and whatever anyone tells me, I shall never believe that Edward (or Robert Pattinson) is hot, as it’s hard to believe that they could be with such descriptions I’ve heard of him.

    Ok, so that was an insanely long post, I’d just like to wind up with saying thanks!!! That was pretty awesome and just made me waste an hour of my life :D xxx

  1653. Jade x
    Posted September 24, 2011 at 6:32 am

    Ok, I have quite a few things to say, mostly to the first hundred comments that I read that were posted way back in 2009.

    Firstly, the author of this blog has a right to her own opinion, and by simply stating that she’s full of crap and that the Twilight series is fantastic is exactly what she is talking about. I am probably the biggest Harry Potter fan that you will ever come across and have not read Twilight but I hope you don’t dislike me for that reason. But whenever someone insults Harry Potter in front of me, I simply shrug my shoulders and walk away, never to bring it up again. Secondly, please don’t continue to tell her that she’s being hypocritical because her grammar is off. This is a blog, not a novel. Bad grammar should be allowed on a small blog, but never in a book. This list was most likely a little bit of fun, and you have no right to tell her off for that. If you’re so obsessed with Twilight then why are you even reading this post?! Surely you have better things to do in your free time than flame some poor girl.

    Next, to the person who wrote this and anyone else who cares to read it:

    ‘As much as the purists may want to disagree, literature is about making money. You may dislike the story, you may find grammatical errors, you may even think the message is dangerous, but if it SELLS then maybe instead of wasting your time compiling a list of why “Twilight” sucks, you may want to study why it has succeeded and see if you have the talent or ability to do so yourself. If you can’t make as much money and as many sales as this author has, then no matter what, she is more SUCCESSFUL than you are or may ever be.’

    Literature has never been, is never and I hope never will be about making money, in my own opinion of course. As a budding author, I have written a few novels and sent them off for my friends to read but never once to an editor and could not care less. Literature is about expressing your thoughts and feeling and being imaginative and creative in writing.

    Now, to everyone who says that “At least teenage girls are reading!” I am a 13 year old girl, with Twilight lovers and haters alike as friends. I have never read Twilight, nor do I ever intend to. All of the fangirls I have as friends are hard to stand after a while because of their obsessiveness. I am an avid reader, and to suggest that all 13 year olds never read is quite rude. My close friend and I, both obsessed with reading, have gotten another one of our friends to read without coming close to such crap. It started as lending her my favourite book, in which she kept for six or so months, and returned it, not having liked it much, but she read a book. We then had a competition to see who could read the Harry Potter series the fastest (I, of course, won!) and that’s another seven books on the pile of books she’s read recently. So please don’t try and tell me that the only way to get people to read is to shove crappy novels at their faces and tell them to read.

    Next, I am going to agree with the author on many different levels, even if I haven’t read the series. All I hear from friends who like Twilight is how perfect Edward is, and what people fail to realise is that nobody’s perfect, not even sparkly vampires! Bella is also immensely dependent on someone else, which is never going to be healthy. The list was funny and entertaining and for some reason came up when I searched Harry Potter!!! So well done :D There is no plot, even when I ask my friends to explain it to me. They start with “It’s a long story.” and end, a minute later with “So yeah…” I can hardly see what people see in it. The hype of it all is insane too, and whatever anyone tells me, I shall never believe that Edward (or Robert Pattinson) is hot, as it’s hard to believe that they could be with such descriptions I’ve heard of him.

    Ok, so that was an insanely long post, I’d just like to wind up with saying thanks!!! That was pretty awesome and just made me waste an hour of my life :D xxx

  1654. Alexander
    Posted October 5, 2011 at 2:13 am

    I fully agree on your reasons. Twilight is one of the worst books in History. Although I have read worst, this is the worst series ever read. Personally, Harry Potter, Percy Jackson, and Alex Rider are much better than this. After getting my hands on a copy of it from my sister, I started reading. Soon, just after the first page, I was wishing I didn\’t read it in the first place. I was truly upset by this all.
    Of course, the authors writing abilities did not help at all. It does not focus on anything. No mentions of fangs. I read because I was HOPING for them to mention fangs. After reading, I thought to myself,\”Is this not suppose to be a Vampire book?\” I find so many reasons wrong with this entire series. Which is why I support these reasons of why Twilight is bad.

  1655. Lolcat
    Posted October 9, 2011 at 7:36 am

    I dont hate Twilight, but I dislike it. I’m trying to become a writer myself so I read tons of books to get a perspective on what I think a good writer is. I wouldn’t say Stephanie is the BEST writer but she is better than most.
    And also, why hate on the author? Steph came up with a reasonably original idea and made a lot of money out of it. I mean, vampires who sparkle? Dude…seriously. I would enjoy making tons of money :D I wouldn’t really care if people hated on me…I’d just care about the fans and ignore the haters. Which is probably what she does :L Ignore people like you who diss the story to the max…
    Meh..I lol’d :) Good job bro…It’s enjoyable reading this kinda stuff :D
    P.S. Dont hate on me cos i said i wanted to be a writer and have probably made tons of grammar mistakes and spelling mistakes in this. I didn’t really look it over.
    OH AND WHILE WE’RE ON THAT POINT; it’s her editors fault for the grammatic and spelling mistakes in the books. So yeah.

  1656. Akane
    Posted October 28, 2011 at 9:11 pm

    I absolutely hate the Twilight series. It has made me absolutely ASHAMED to be a teenage girl. I cannot even say “Eh, I don’t really like Twilight very much.” at my school without having some fangirl get all butthurt and shriek at me something along the lines of “Nobody cares what you think! Twilight is beautiful and amazing! You’re just jealous, you stupid bitch!”

  1657. lynn
    Posted November 21, 2011 at 3:42 am

    Hell yeah! Definitely I agree with you, my best friend made me read these crap because I always made fun of her when she went to watch the movies, she was always like ‘Oh the movie sucks but you should definitely read the books, whole difference’ So unfortunately I read them, and now i’m proud to say that I can make fun of her now, not only for watching awful movies with terrible actors, but also for reading awful books with terrible writing and a terrible plot. Oh and by the way, I know a guy who named his son Emmett because of the guy in the book and the most impressive thing is that he’s like 40 and he’s definitely not gay!! :S

  1658. Edward
    Posted November 22, 2011 at 6:16 pm

    when he says Stephanie Meyer can’t write. I personally thought it was written by a nineteen year old girl desperate for a romantic relationship. The characters are flat, the dialogue is unrealistic. The plot doesn’t hold water. If she continues to write one hopes that she will improve over time. I fear that she may have ruined one of my favorite genres, the vampire novel.

  1659. David
    Posted November 27, 2011 at 3:03 pm

    I am a guy, so I’m definitely not the demographic for Twilight and, having watched a bit of one of the movies, definitely fall into the “this is painfully bad” group.

    Overlooking the writing, the bad acting, the poor storyline, etc. the reason why I hat twilight is that it takes fictional characters, vampires and werewolves, that have consistently been portrayed in literature and movies as serious, don’t mess with, monsters and turns them into simpering puppies that appeal to 10 to 12 year old girls. Obviously the intended audience. If you are an adult and you actually like this, maybe, just maybe, it’s time to read some decent books to broaden your horizon.

    The last best example of a decent vampire/werewolf movie, in my opinion, are the Underworld series. In fact, the fourth movie in the series is coming out in January 2012.

  1660. Lexi lynn
    Posted November 28, 2011 at 10:49 am

    ok well just to let you know twilight happens to be an amazing series and if you hate it you should maybe not plaster things like this all over the internet bcuz there is other lovers like me who might be near you that would be willing to beat the hell out of you over an opinion …… trust me it has happened to me

  1661. Lulu
    Posted December 3, 2011 at 2:51 pm

    me, i love vampire diaries. for one, it delves into different problems and although at first it seems similar to twilight because of the love triangle and vampires, it really is not. believe me. its nothing like that crap. the vampires are not sparkly or soppy, and there’s a lot of character depth. its about 1/5 about love (more at beginning) and is very realistc. its not afraid to get right into the depths of real life if vampires and such were real. and no one in there is ‘perfect’. watch it :)
    plus damon/ian is hot
    just saying ;)

    REASONS WHY I HATE TWILIGHT:

    It’s not realistic. It’s unwilling to delve into the depths of REAL life and REAL problems.

    It’s very black and white. And do we see character changes in twilight? NO. There’s no character depth either.

    No one good dies; there’s no sacrifice, and everyone lives happily ever after beating the ‘baddies’. Meyer is afraid to kill off people.

    Everything revolves around the couple.

    Bella is depressing, fun less, selfish, not independent at all, and relies on Edward for EVERYTHING. Great role model for kids out there! You just can’t live or make decisions without a man.

    She revolves her whole world around him. She deserts her friends and family, apart from Charlie.

    Bella never hates Edward. She worships him, and is generally obsessed with him.

    Edward is like wet socks; he’s sparkly, soppy and practically blackmails Bella to marry him.

    Edward’s a 100 year old virgin!

    They DONT HAVE FANGS. wtf?!?!?!

    Their love is based purely on appearance.

    Edward’s dead. How can he produce a baby?

    So it’s okay to have a baby at 18 and ditch your normal life and school? Yeah right.

  1662. Lianne
    Posted December 6, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    bloody hell this took a lot of scrolling to get to.
    I started rereading it because i was so bored, and it’s damn addicting for all the wrong reasons. I’m a sucker for romance.
    But anyway, her writing frustrates me so much.
    From what I’ve heard, Robert Pattinson doesn’t like Edward much, either.
    Vampires need fangs, Meyer. Sparkling I can handle, now. NO FANGS is a different story

  1663. Abby
    Posted December 15, 2011 at 12:04 am

    Edward is not a pedophile, he is physically a 17-year-old. But Bella on the other hand is a necrophile. The “author” makes a point that Edward is super cold, yet Bella enjoys kissing him, hugging him and having sex with him! Yeeeww!

    He is so cold that his skin sparkles in the sun – the ice crystals, I suppose. So, he cannot be in the sun because he would thaw and eventually rot! LOL

  1664. B2OBA
    Posted January 5, 2012 at 4:45 pm

    It is true, most of those “twilight fan comments” could get a toothless person smiling in public. but i’d like to underline that the hundred years old difference = pedophile is quite not really that well-founded. lets take for instance the Last airbender for any fan who’s watched the whole cartoon you’ve probably noticed aang, too, was hybernating in some sort of spherical iceberg for a hundred years but he did still fall in love…but then again, YEAH, the only difference is that Aang came out a kid and didn’t age a single hair during a hundred years.(i think that’s creative) BTW, i fully agree with the majority of you’re comments, if they are true, since i haven’t actually read the book. but if any fan came out of the twilight series, with the lexicon of a newborn, then he/she must definitively throw that book or demand a refund. Period.

  1665. Chicken
    Posted January 6, 2012 at 5:27 am

    response to number 89# Oh my god!!!!!!!! Light Yagami RULES!!!!!! Well actually he dies before he accomplishes that… LOL DEATH NOTE IS AMAZING!!!!! hehe
    I think this is a bit repetitive and alot of the reasons… arent really good reasons but it made me laugh heaps xD
    Your pretty brave to post this! Next thing you know a swarm full of sparkling vampires will be knocking at your door ;)
    HAHA

  1666. fart face
    Posted January 14, 2012 at 11:25 pm

    PFFFF-
    This page is so full of Lols, no one seems to understand that.
    You people are so silly and so stupid that it’s funny! All you people who are mad at this author, it’s sad that you are so involved with this book that you don’t realize how pathetic you are to get so worked up over an article. YOu just don’t seem to realize all you’re doing is entertaining this person with each of your ’scarring’ comments. Believe me… we laugh at your comments.
    As for Twilight haters, good for you! You found a page that you enjoy and obviously is good for your side. Still, there is no need for a rant on a page about a rant. THAT”S ENOUGH RANTING PEOPLE!
    As for you who call this author ’stupid’ ‘childish’ or another insult, I just have to say, how old are you, 5? This article is used to express someone’s opinion, and if you have to go out of your way to comment on it to attempt to get your point across, it’s obvious that the childish or stupid one is you! If you truly hated this article then you
    1) wouldn’t have even looked at the page
    2) wouldn’t have bothered to read it
    3) wouldn’t have bothered to comment on it and take to time to write a very long comment. If you’re trying to hate… you’re failing and everyone is laughing at you. Just saying.
    I don’t care if everyone here gangs up on me and demands for me to apologize (no wait.. don’t hit me) still, there is no need to throw a big ruccus just because you don’t agree with the article. I just want to end this thing by saying this:
    Don’t comment and put all your opinions on this. When you yell at them to respect your opinion, you really aren’t respecting theirs, so why should they respect yours? When you comment, you should comment in a neat and orderly adult-like fashion, because otherwise, people are only making fun of you and laughing at you (I showed all my friends and we picked out the stupid ones and made fun of them. You people are so silly!) Anyhows… if you truly don’t like it, don’t comment. If you truly do like it but disagree with some, say that. But don’t go crazy and be like,
    ‘HOW DARE YOU SAY THIS! EDWARD IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD, HOW DARE YOU COMMENT IN SUCH A MEAN WAY! YOU SUCK, BLAH BLAH INSERT PATHETIC CURSES HERE!’ Because then we all know you are secretly a troll who hates twilight but are commenting like this for attention. Don’t be looking for attention, becuase as I said, we laugh at you for that. :D

  1667. LilliKat
    Posted January 18, 2012 at 8:01 pm

    Well, i think that the second book as bad but i fell in love with the first book. I really didn’t remember the third book but i almost liked it.

    I really think that if you wan to crush little girls dream then fine. Go ahead and make them feel uninspired. I though it was very well written and i really didn’t find any errors.

    Stephanie Meyer is a really good writer and i think you should just lay off the hate mail. because some writers are just terrible and unworthy of the paper the book was published on but i really think that she did a good job for some of the only books she’s written.

    People should have there own opinion, yes, that’s true but sometime your opinions hurt other people, i feel that every one should be independent and women should not have to lean on a guys every word and though and body movement, but still i think that they should just enjoy the book or movie or hate it but just keep your opinions to a minimum like 10, or 20 maybe but not 95.

    Thank you if you read this whole thing that means a-lot that mean you really care what other people have to say.

  1668. Posted January 27, 2012 at 9:09 am

    Twilight is a series of four vampire-themed fantasy romance novels by American author Stephenie Meyer. It charts a period in the life of Isabella “Bella” Swan, a teenage girl who moves to Forks, Washington, and falls in love with a 104-year-old vampire named Edward Cullen.

  1669. Robin Carlson
    Posted January 29, 2012 at 11:39 am

    I think it is incredibly lame that you made a web site about this. If you don’t like it don’t read it jack ass. It’s entertainment, it is not real. Just as Star Trek, Star Wars, Harry Potter and countless other novels and movies are FOR ENTERTAINMENT purposes only. The reason there are so many different genres is because we as human beings are all different and unique. God forbid if I was forced to conform to and like anything you would give a good rating to. My message to you is to GET A LIFE.

  1670. abby
    Posted January 30, 2012 at 2:02 pm

    @Missus Angel and Buffy, you spelled Joss Whedon’s name wrong.

  1671. M.L.M.
    Posted February 4, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    I couldn’t agree more. My ten-year-old little sister could out-write Meyer. Hell, my little sister’s characters have more depth than Meyer’s!

  1672. Shelbi Johnson
    Posted February 16, 2012 at 1:31 pm

    Ok, so most of theses comments are so true. A lot of people call this book voyeuristic(a person who obtains sexual pleasure or excitement from the observation of someone undressing, having intercourse, etc) and inappropriate to read. Honestly its not though there isn’t enough sexual acts or anything in the books. Wow, they have a meke-out scene every few pages and they have sex in the last book but don’t even talk about the sex. All they do is say that they had sex they don’t tell you what happen during the sex or anything close to that. Honestly it was a quite boring book to read. It was way to predictable to have any excitment in reading it. There are some people that like it when they define what happens during there private and personal moments. Some people don’t like it. Meyers could have done a better job of balancing to two out and making the books more intresting to read. Over all the books were ok but could have been so much better. I defintly won’t be reading them anytime soon.

  1673. Posted March 2, 2012 at 11:14 pm

    It is impossible for Harry Potter fans to be objective. So they should stop trying to find things wrong with Twilight, or any other book for that matter.Same goes for Twilight fans.

  1674. dana york
    Posted March 13, 2012 at 1:50 am

    to julie, second comment. honey, nobody uses the word lame anymore.
    anyways, i think twilight is absolute crap, the fans are batcrap crazy and scare the hell out of me, one girl who i used to sit next to in maths found out i hated twilight when i wrote it on facebook how bad it is then at school the next day she comes up to me and she f**king punch me in the face and broke my bloody nose \”you just to stupid to appreciate it and you know your to ugly to get a boyfriend like edward!\” of course she was expelled.
    my thoughts on that attack.
    for starters, if you can relate to ANYONE on twilight i feel sorry for you. you must be pretty frickin pathetic.
    stephanie meyer is an idiot. she ruined vampires, is a pathetic excuse for a writer, and frankly, the story is disturbing
    the messages they send. i wonder what she was thinking \”oh i know, i\’m going to write about sparklying fairies i mean vampires and warewolves and tell teenage girls not to do anythin for themselves, tell them if there boyfriend break up with them to commit suicide because women are stupid and can\’t live unless they have a man.
    if people actually still give a shit about this shit when i\’m older and have a family i would never let my daughters read twilight because of the example bella sets and i wouldn\’t want her to waste her time.

  1675. Maria
    Posted March 17, 2012 at 3:18 am

    Wow,
    this is pathetic.
    DO NOT attack other people for liking the Twilight saga.

    Your reasons suck and half of your comments do not even make sense. Your grammar sucks, so I do not think you should be judging Meyer. You are just insulting any Twilight fan by saying their grammar sucks. Maybe you should check your own grammar, and the grammar of the people agreeing with you before making statements like that.
    She can’t think of original names? WTF? What kind of name is she supposed to come up with? Hun, there are no set rules for fiction; Meyer can make her vampires however she wants to. FYI, that was the point of Bella, so most normal teenagers could imagine themselves as her.
    I usually believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion but make a reasonable argument, Instead of making a list of pointless shit that make no sense, GET A LIFE.

  1676. Maria
    Posted March 17, 2012 at 3:21 am

    Wow,
    this is pathetic.
    DO NOT attack other people for liking the Twilight saga.

    Your reasons suck and half of your comments did not even make sense. Your grammar sucks, so I do not think you should be judging Meyer. You are just insulting any Twilight fan by saying their grammar sucks. Maybe you should check your own grammar, and the grammar of the people agreeing with you before making statements like that.

    She can’t think of original names? WTF? What kind of name is she supposed to come up with? Hun, there are no set rules for fiction; Meyer can make her vampires however she wants to. FYI, that was the point of Bella, so most normal teenagers could imagine themselves as her.

    I usually believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion but make a reasonable argument, Instead of making a list of pointless shit that make no sense, GET A LIFE.

  1677. random guy
    Posted March 22, 2012 at 10:57 pm

    You know my girlfriend bought the first book when it came out. She read a couple of pages and then we burned the book in the backyard. My sister later watched the first movie when it came out, she went out of the cinema demanding her money back because (I quote) she would rather listen to all of the Maggie Thatcher speaches than watch this shit of a movie… Pleease, sparkling vampires… God, it’s so pathetic…

  1678. Posted March 24, 2012 at 7:02 am

    I respect that you have an opinion and you have many valid points. I question your motive though. There are so many bad books out there why waste your time. Three quarters of the teenage girls in the world are mindless copies…let them be (I’d rather they existed so I could be so quirky*).

    I personally found Twilight watery, lacking any sort of ideological or social comment (general ‘moral of the story’) and practically begging for a devastating ending…on the other hand, I applaud Stephenie Meyer for succeeding. Bravo

  1679. Posted March 31, 2012 at 7:27 am

    On reason 65 you say Edward can’t read Bella’s mind because she doesnt have one… well in Twilight Saga New Moon (if you have ever watched it cause you seem a little obsested by writing about twilight ) Jane reads Bella’s mind. ;D and do do a few other people i cant be bothered to mention! ;0

  1680. Chopper-man
    Posted April 12, 2012 at 5:22 am

    Never read the books and only saw 2 of the movies. But, I do like Alice better than Bella and Jasper got me more interested than Edward.lol

    After learning that they didn’t get much attention and character development through out the whole series is a real disappointment :/ oh well…

  1681. Sapphire S-P
    Posted May 2, 2012 at 11:24 am

    Hmm, most of the reasons are valid. However, some reasons are totally lame:
    1. Bella is NOT a Mary-Sue. She is more of an Anti-Sue, which explains why she looks like a younger S. Meyer but isn’t exactly perfect.
    2. Ahem, SOME of us do not think we are Bella.
    3. Harry Potter vs Twilight? STOP! AVADA KEDAV- I mean, this is so CLICHE! HP is about wizards, Twilight is about quasi-vampires! These genres are UNRELATED!
    4. A normal Twilight fan can spell AND use correct grammar. Are you nuts?
    5. A judgmental Twilight fan DOES NOT threaten to attack with ‘cool vampire powers’; he or she ponders over the comment and does research!
    6. We applaud Stephenie Meyer. HAHAHA!!!

Leave a Reply